SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DISSECTION”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1992

[Acute non-opacified dissection of the ascending thoracic aorta--significance of retrograde dissection and re-dissection].

Thirteen cases of acute aortic dissection with non-opacified false lumen of the ascending aorta were examined by CT and other imaging modalities. On the basis of the initial CT findings, these cases were classified into two types; one was pure non-opacified dissection not associated with opacified false lumen (Type N, n = 7), the other was non-opacified dissection of the ascending aorta associated with opacified false lumen of the following aorta (Type N+O, n = 6). On examining the relation between the entry site and the false lumen in Type N+O, the dissection of the ascending aorta was considered to be retrograde. Retrograde dissection seemed to be an important factor in the development of the non-opacified dissection of the ascending aorta. During the follow-up period, re-dissection in the ascending aorta occurred in four of the 13 cases (Type N = 3, Type N+O = 1). The re-dissection occurred within the first four weeks in all of them, and the diagnosis of re-dissection was possible at its early stage. In one case, ulcerlike projection (ULP) was detected by aortography. In another case, ULP was identified by cine-MR imaging. Contrast CT also revealed enlargement and small opacification of the false lumen. In two other cases, similar CT findings were observed. Three of the four patients recovered by surgical treatment. One died the day after the diagnosis of re-dissection. Early diagnosis and earliest possible surgical intervention for re-dissection were considered necessary to save the patients with re-dissected false lumen in the ascending aorta. Close observations with several imaging modalities, mainly CT examination, should be paid in the patients with non-opacified dissection of the ascending aorta for at least four weeks after the onset of dissection.

Aged↗

PubMed2007

The impact of alternating dissection on student performance in a medical anatomy course: are dissection videos an effective substitute for actual dissection?

The way in which anatomy is taught to first year medical students at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill was recently changed, so that first year students are now divided into two groups that dissect alternately. The effect of this change on both written and practical test performance was analyzed by comparing grades from 2004 with those from the previous year (2003), when students performed all the dissections. A statistically significant decrease (P < or = 0.05) from 2003 was noted on three of the four written test scores in 2004, while practical examination scores in 2004 fluctuated from lower to higher than those in 2003, depending on the unit of material being covered. However, the number of students failing each of the examinations (written and practical combined) was statistically greater on only one of the four examinations in 2004. Scores of the two groups dissecting alternately in 2004 were essentially the same on the practical examinations. There was no difference in the number of questions answered incorrectly between these two groups in the two practical examinations where comparisons were made. Furthermore, students who dissected a particular structure did not score significantly better on practical questions concerning that structure than students who had not dissected it. The effect of the availability of step-by-step dissection videos on student practical examination scores is also discussed. We conclude that the change in the curriculum had a significant impact on the students' written examination performance, given the same material in the course. The reasons for this include student course load, increased need for self-study, and a loss of a learning opportunity in the dissection laboratory, all of which affect student comprehension and retention of the material and their ability to use it in problem solving.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

What price dissection? Dissection literally dissected.

Hamlet: Has this fellow no feelings of his business, that he sings at grave-making? Horatio: Custom hath made it in him a property of easiness. (Hamlet Act V, scene i) Hamlet is appalled by the gravedigger's insensitivity towards death and corpses. Horatio explains that the gravedigger is so accustomed to such things that he no longer shares Hamlet's seriousness. We contend that human dissection may make in medical students and doctors the "property of easiness" in dealing with death and the human body, and that this may have negative consequences for medics and patients. It is perhaps worth emphasising at the outset what this essay is NOT about. We do not wish to call into question the value of dissection in medical education; to charge dissection with being an inefficient or ineffective means of teaching and learning human anatomy is not our intent. Instead, we explore, through the medium of literature, experiences of dissection, and what kind of student and doctor may be encouraged or produced by the dissection room; what price might be paid for a practical, first-hand experience of human anatomy.

Anatomy↗

PubMed1994

Coronary stenting for acute coronary dissection after coronary angioplasty: implications of residual dissection.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the implications of residual coronary dissections after stenting. BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting is currently used in selected patients with coronary dissection after angioplasty. However, in some patients the total length of the dissection may not be completely covered with the device. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients (mean [+/- SD] age 58 +/- 11 years; 39 men, 3 women) undergoing stenting for a major coronary dissection after angioplasty were studied. RESULTS: Thirty (67%) coronary dissections were small (< or = 15 mm), and 29 (64%) were occlusive (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade < or = 2). In 3 patients, coronary stenting was unable to open large occlusive dissections, but a good angiographic result was obtained in 39 patients (93%). After stenting, 22 of these patients (56%) had no visible residual dissections, and 13 (33%) had small and 4 (10%) had large residual dissections. These residual dissections were stable and did not compromise coronary flow. In a repeat angiogram (24 h later) the stent was patent in all 39 patients. However, two patients experienced a subacute stent occlusion. Of the remaining 37 patients, 36 (97%) had a late angiogram after stenting. Quantitative angiography revealed a reduction in minimal lumen diameter at the stent site (2.6 +/- 0.4 vs. 2 +/- 0.7 mm, p < 0.05) and a trend toward improvement in vessel diameter at the site of the previous residual dissection (1.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.9 +/- 0.5 mm, p < 0.1). The angiographic image of residual dissection disappeared in all patients. These factors provided a rather smooth angiographic appearance at follow-up. The four patients with large residual dissections after stenting did not have restenosis and were asymptomatic at last visit. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary stenting is effective in the management of acute coronary dissections after angioplasty. In this setting, small residual dissections are frequently seen but have a good outcome and disappear at follow-up. Large residual dissections may have a good outcome if coronary flow is not impaired and no residual stenosis is visualized.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1995

Lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Two- and 3-field lymph node dissection.

Patients' records were analyzed to evaluate the effect of lymph node dissection on the survival of patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Patients who underwent incomplete resection of the tumor were excluded from this study. A conventional lower mediastinal and abdominal lymph node dissection (conventional 2-field dissection) had been performed in 410 patients. A complete dissection of the upper mediastinal nodes was performed in addition in 121 patients (extended 2-field dissection). Sixty-four patients underwent a further dissection of the cervical periesophageal lymph nodes through the thoracic cavity (super-extended 2-field dissection). A cervical, mediastinal, and abdominal lymph node dissection was carried out in another 100 patients (3-field dissection). Background factors in the latter three groups were similar. Mean numbers of dissected lymph nodes in extended 2-field, super extended 2-field, and 3-field dissections were 32, 57, and 77, respectively. Operative mortality rates were 11%, 9%, and 3%, respectively. The five-year survival rates for patients who underwent extended 2-field or 3-field dissection were 43% and 61%; the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.000113). The four-year survival rate for super-extended 2-field dissection was 53%. Among those patients who underwent 3-field dissection, 58 (58%) had histologically positive lymph nodes. Their five-year survival rate was 47%. The patients' survival has been improved by increasing the field of lymph node dissection without deterioration of operative mortality.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2002

[Retrograde type A dissection after endovascular stent grafting of type B dissection].

Acute aortic dissection is a disease with high mortality. Whereas acute dissection of the ascending aorta (Standford type A) is treated surgically, acute dissection of Stanford type B (descending aorta) is principally treated conservatively, but surgically in case of complications. Recently, another therapeutical option for the treatment of type B dissection has been developed using endovascular stent-grafts. We report on a 64-year-old woman with typical signs of acute aortic dissection. Computer tomography and transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated Stanford type B dissection. The patient was treated with an endovascular stent-graft, because of malperfusion of the right leg and chest pain. After successful closure of the entry by the stent, the patient developed acute right-sided hemiplegia one day after the intervention due to retrograde dissection into the aortic arch and ascending aorta. Upon immediate operation, the origin of the initially type B dissection was still sufficiently occluded by the endovascular stent-graft; however, there was another entry between the innominate artery and the left carotic artery near one proximal end of the stent's strut. Using deep hypothermia and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion, the ascending aorta and proximal arch were replaced with a 28 mm Dacron-Velour tube and the aortic root was remodelled with a tongue-shaped Dacron graft preserving the valve cusps according to a modified Yacoub procedure. After the operation, neurological symptoms diminished and the patient could walk on the ward on day eleven. This case demonstrates retrograde type A dissection as a complication after interventional treatment of type B dissection using an endovascular stent-graft. The reason for this delayed complication is speculative. Aortic wall damage during stent inserting could be a possible cause. It is also likely that the patient initially had type B dissection with retrograde dissection of the distal part of the aortic arch. Therefore, one of the straight struts of the proximal end of the stent may have caused additional damage to the vulnerable dissected aortic wall in the arch, leading to retrograde type A dissection. Careful patient selection, detailed diagnosis of the aortic arch, improved stent designs and materials, especially regarding the stent's ends and careful insertion of the stent into the aortic arch, could contribute to prevention of the described problems.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2002

Cervical artery dissections: evidence for redissection in previously dissected arteries: report of three cases.

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: Among patients with spontaneous internal carotid artery (ICA) or vertebral artery dissections, there is a small but significant risk of development of dissection in an uninvolved ICA or vertebral artery at some time in the future. Recurrence of dissection in a previously dissected and healed ICA or vertebral artery is very rare. We retrospectively reviewed more than 400 cases of cervical artery dissections in our cerebrovascular records for 1970 through 2000. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: Three patients with recurrence of dissection in previously dissected and presumably healed ICAs were identified. All three patients were women. Their ages at the time of the initial dissection were 42, 38, and 31 years. Initial ICA dissections were bilateral in all cases, occurring simultaneously in one case and 1 year apart in the other two cases. All dissections were spontaneous. Redissection of a previously dissected and healed ICA in these three patents occurred 11, 6, and 12 years later, respectively. Two patients had fibromuscular dysplasia. CONCLUSION: Our experience with these three cases, from among more than 400 cases of cervical artery dissections treated at our institution, and the very limited number of reported cases in the literature indicate the rarity of recurrence of dissection in previously dissected and healed cervical arteries. An underlying arteriopathy may be suspected in many of these cases. Management requires medical and sometimes surgical approaches.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Laparoscopic lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery for cancer in the lower sigmoid colon and rectum: is D3 lymph node dissection with preservation of the left colic artery feasible?

BACKGROUND: When we perform laparoscopic lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), we preserve the left colic artery (LCA) to maintain the blood supply to the proximal sigmoid colon. In this study, we present our laparoscopic D2 and D3 lymph node (LN) dissection technique and evaluate its applicability and safety. METHODS: We performed LN dissection on 23 rectal and lower sigmoid colon cancer cases from April 2002 to December 2004. For D3 LN dissection, the incision to the mesosigmoid extends to just before the root of the IMA, which is exposed with an ultrasonic cutting and coagulating surgical device to avoid bleeding. Then, the arterial wall is exposed with a dissecting electrocautery spatula down to the LCA, at least 2 cm of which is exposed. Adipose tissue surrounding the IMA and inferior mesenteric vein is dissected. For D2 LN dissection, we partially expose the IMA to confirm the location of the LCA. RESULTS: The mean times taken for D2 and D3 LN dissections were 36.2 and 68.2 min, respectively. Both procedures took longer in male patients. There was a trend for the procedure overall to take less time in female patients. However, D2 dissection took significantly longer in male than female patients (p < 0.05). In women, D3 dissection took significantly longer than D2 (p < 0.05), but this trend was not seen in men. Increased experience among surgeons with this procedure was associated with significantly faster LN dissections in men (p < 0.05), but not in women (p = 0.493). Pearson product moment analysis identified a relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the time taken for D2 LN dissection (r = 0.765), but not D3 LN dissection (r = 0.158). There was no treatment-related morbidity with this technique. CONCLUSIONS: This method was safe and feasible for all patients in this series, but takes longer to perform in male patients.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

[Endografting for refractory aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the safety and feasibility of endograft repair in refractory aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm. METHODS: The clinical data of 13 refractory cases of aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm, 11 males and 2 females, aged 52 (38-82), out of the 68 consecutive patients with aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm who underwent endograft repair from Jan 2001 to Oct 2004, were analyzed. Nine of the 13 cases were diagnoses as with aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm of Stanford type A, 3 of which had tears in the ascending aorta (DeBakey type I), 3 had tears in aortic arch, and 3 had tears on the distal aortic arch with ascending aorta involved; and the other four out of the 13 cases were diagnosed as Stanford type B, one with Marfan's syndrome. Eight of the 13 cases had more than 2 entries, 3 of which had suffered from shock and hemathorax due to rupture preoperatively. Follow-up ranging 2 months to 3 years was carried out after the operation. RESULTS: Transluminal placement of stentgratf was technically successful in all patients. Three patients with DeBakey type I dissections received stent-grafts introduced through the left common carotid or right femoral artery, of which one case died from gastrointestinal hemorrhage 1 month postoperatively. For the patients with tears in aortic arch preliminary Y type bypass from ascending aorta to left common carotid artery and left subclivian artery was performed in 2 cases, and carotid-carotid artery bypass was performed in one case, and then stent-grafts were deployed through right femoral artery. The 3 cases with tears in the distal arch and ruptured aneurysm, received stent-grafts implantation through the femoral artery emergently, and closed thoracic drainage and anti-shock treatment, one of which died from another aneurysm rupture 27 hours postoperatively. Out of the 4 cases with Stanford type B dissection with multiple tear entries, 3 underwent multiple stent-grafts repair and 1 underwent emergent abdominal-bilateral iliac arteries Y-type graft bypass due to rupture of iliac dissecting aneurysm. During the follow-up CT, MRI and color Doppler sonography showed that all 11 patients remained healthy with the former tears well closed and thrombosis in the false lumen. CONCLUSION: Endograft repair for refractory aortic dissecting aneurysm is feasible and technically successful, especially for the patients with tears in the ascending aorta or aortic arch.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Post-operative morbidity following paediatric tonsillectomy; a comparison of bipolar diathermy dissection and blunt dissection.

In a prospective study of 76 children aged between 18 months and 13 years, 40 children underwent tonsillectomy using the traditional blunt dissection technique with bipolar diathermy to establish haemostasis while 36 children underwent tonsillectomy where bipolar diathermy alone was used to dissect out the tonsils. Blood loss was significantly reduced in the diathermy dissection group (10.5 ml +/- 2.05, diathermy dissection, 33.56 ml +/- 1.95, blunt dissection, P < 0.05). More analgesia was required in the diathermy dissection group prior to hospital discharge (P = 0.01). The diathermy dissection group took a significantly longer period of time to re-establish a normal diet (7.07 days +/- 0.44, diathermy dissection, 5.15 days +/- 0.36, blunt dissection, P = 0.001). Fifteen percent of children in the blunt dissection group and 31% in the diathermy dissection group were taken to the general practitioner between days 3-10 because of sore throat, poor oral intake or otalgia. Twenty two point four percent of children overall were prescribed antibiotics. This recently described technique of bipolar diathermy dissection could be a useful technique in selected cases such as the very small or those with a bleeding diathesis but is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and requires good postoperative analgesia.

Acetaminophen↗

PubMed1997

Aortic dissection decades following internal carotid artery dissection--report of two cases.

Recurrent dissections involving carotid, vertebral, or renal arteries have been described in patients with spontaneous cervical artery dissections, with a maximal interval between dissections of fourteen years. The authors describe 2 patients in whom aortic dissections developed twenty-five and forty years, respectively, following carotid artery dissections. These 2 patients constituted 8% of the total number of patients from Rochester, Minnesota, who were diagnosed with aortic dissection between 1987 and 1992. The first patient, a forty-five-year-old woman, presented in 1948 with right neck pain and headache, associated with several episodes of transient numbness of the right face and numbness and clumsiness of the left upper and lower extremities. Examination showed right miosis. Angiography showed a stenosis of the extracranial right internal carotid artery beginning several centimeters from the bifurcation. She died at age eighty-five from an aortic dissection. The second patient, a thirty-eight-year-old man, noted left orbital and frontotemporal headaches and drooping of the left eyelid in 1962. Examination showed left oculosympathetic palsy. Angiography showed stenosis and an aneurysm in the midportion of the extracranial left internal carotid artery. He died at age sixty-three from an aortic dissection. These cases suggest that following a carotid artery dissection the risk of a recurrent arterial dissection may remain elevated for a prolonged period of time and the recurrent dissection may involve the aorta.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes with 2 donor dissection methods for Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative, nonrandomized case series. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred thirty consecutive transplants, 114 with manually dissected and 216 with microkeratome-dissected donor tissue. METHODS: Donor posterior stroma/endothelium was transplanted, after stripping recipient Descemet's membrane/endothelium and dissecting the donor tissue by hand or with a microkeratome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidences of donor perforation and donor detachment were compared for all eyes. Visual and refractive outcomes were compared for the first 100 consecutive eyes in each group. RESULTS: Visual recovery was faster with microkeratome-dissected donor tissue, as evidenced by statistically better best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (VA) in that group 1 month after surgery (P = 0.015). Best spectacle-corrected VA was statistically comparable for the 2 groups preoperatively and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Best spectacle-corrected VA was not correlated significantly with postoperative central corneal thickness (P = 0.25). Corneal thickness was significantly higher in the microkeratome group (690+/-77 mum, compared with 610+/-62 mum after hand dissection; P<0.0001). Mean refractive astigmatism was 1.5 diopters (D) preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively in both groups. Spherical equivalent refraction did not change in the microkeratome group (P = 0.64) but increased by 0.66 D in the hand dissection group (P = 0.0007). Methods designed to remove fluid from the donor/recipient graft interface ultimately reduced the detachment rate to <1% (1 in the last 140 cases). No donor perforations occurred in 216 microkeratome dissections, compared with 5 in 114 hand dissections (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Microkeratome dissection reduced the risk of donor tissue perforation, provided faster visual recovery after DSEK, and did not alter the refractive outcome.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of cold dissection versus bipolar diathermy dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether bipolar dissection tonsillectomy is associated with a higher post-operative haemorrhage rate than cold dissection tonsillectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Otolaryngology department of a teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and forty-five patients undergoing elective tonsillectomy between July 2002 and November 2004. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to either bipolar dissection or cold dissection (with bipolar haemostasis). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Post-operative haemorrhage rates, management (conservative or surgical) and blood transfusion requirements were recorded. The grade of surgeon and history of quinsy were also recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-one patients (58 per cent) were randomized to the bipolar dissection and 104 (42 per cent) to the cold dissection groups. Seventeen patients (12.1 per cent) in the bipolar dissection group and eight patients (7.7 per cent) in the cold dissection group suffered haemorrhage (p = 1.0; degrees of freedom (Df) 0.0; 95 per cent confidence intervals (CI) -0.1 to 0.0). The haemorrhage rates for procedures conducted by senior house officers, specialist registrars and consultants were 11.4 per cent, 10.3 per cent and 5.0 per cent, respectively. Two patients required surgical intervention, both from the bipolar dissection group. No patients required blood transfusion. A history of quinsy was not associated with an increased haemorrhage rate. CONCLUSION: The difference in haemorrhage rates between groups and surgeon grades did not reach statistical significance. Nonetheless the trend towards a greater incidence of haemorrhage in the bipolar group and in procedures conducted by more junior surgeons during the trial raised concerns. The results of the National Prospective Tonsillectomy Audit and our interim results have led us to abandon the trial and disallow the use of bipolar dissection in tonsillectomies performed by junior staff members.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

[Endovascular stent-graft exclusion on aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm].

OBJECTIVE: To study the techniques and therapeutic effects of endovascular stent-graft exclusion in aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm. METHODS: The clinical data of 20 cases with aortic dissection and(or) dissecting aneurysm were analysed. Stanford A dissection was found in 2 cases, in which one had a tear entry on ascending aorta. Stanford B dissection was found in 18 cases. Five patients had two or more tear entries in different sites. Endovascular polyester-covered stent-graft exclusion was performed in all cases, of which, one case was also given fenestration and graft replacement and one subjected to Y graft bypass from ascending aorta to the left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery before endovascular stent-graft exclusion. RESULTS: No one died in operation. One patient died of heart infarction on the third day after operation. During the followup of 1 - 20 months, 19 patients were alive well (95%). The aortic dissections and(or) dissecting aneurysms of all the patients disappeared without endoleaks and organ or limb ischemia. CONCLUSION: Endovascular stent-graft exclusion with high successful rate, low mortality and high survival rate, is simple, safe and effective in treating aortic dissection and dissecting aneurysm.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Does information from axillary dissection change treatment in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer? An algorithm for assessment of impact of axillary dissection.

OBJECTIVE: The authors assessed the impact of axillary dissection on adjuvant systemic therapy recommendations in patients with breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: With increasing use of systemic therapy in node-negative women and the desire to reduce treatment morbidity and cost, the need for axillary dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer has been challenged. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-two women with clinically negative axillae were analyzed using a model treatment algorithm. Systemic therapy was assigned with and without data from axillary dissection. Treatment shifts based on axillary dissection data were scored. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of clinically node-negative women had pathologically positive nodes. Eight percent of T1a and 10% of T1b tumors had positive nodes and would have been undertreated without axillary dissection. Seven percent of premenopausal women with tumors < 1 cm and 13% with tumors > or = 1 cm had treatment changed by axillary dissection. For women 50 to 60 years of age, 10% with tumors < 1 cm, 17% with tumors 1 to 2 cm with positive prognostic features, and 4% with poor prognostic features had significant treatment shifts after axillary dissection. For clinically node-negative women older than 60 years of age not eligible for chemotherapy, only 3% of those with tumors < 1 cm and none of those with tumors > or = 1 cm had their treatment changed by findings at axillary dissection. Treatment shifts based on axillary dissection were larger if the treatment algorithm allowed for more varied or more aggressive treatment options. CONCLUSIONS: Data obtained from axillary dissection will alter adjuvant systemic therapy regimen in a significant number of clinically node-negative women younger than 60 years of age and for older women eligible to receive chemotherapy.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection.

BACKGROUND: Extracranial internal carotid artery dissection can lead to occlusion of the artery and hence cause an ischemic stroke. It is the underlying stroke mechanism in approximately 2.5% of all strokes, and the second leading cause of stroke in patients younger than 45 years of age. Antithrombotic agents (heparin, oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs) may prevent arterial thrombosis in eICAD, but these benefits may be offset by increased bleeding. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether antithrombotic drugs (antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulation) are effective and safe in treatment of patients with extracranial internal carotid artery dissection, and which is the better treatment. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group specialised Trials Register for relevant randomised trials and controlled clinical trials. In addition, we performed comprehensive searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE and checked reference lists of all relevant papers for additional eligible studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials assessing the efficacy of antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants in the treatment of extracranial carotid artery dissection. For non-randomised trials, case series (studies), that reported on antithrombotic treatment with at least 4 patients, were eligible. All trials and studies were assessed for eligibility. Data from all eligible studies were extracted independently by two reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on the primary outcome measures were extracted systematically. These were: all deaths, vascular deaths, and disability. Secondary outcomes were: first stroke occurrence, stroke recurrence, any stroke during reported follow-up, extracranial haemorrhage, and intracranial haemorrhage. The first choice treatment was taken for analyses. MAIN RESULTS: No randomised trials and 49 case series (including 683 treated patients) were identified. No reliable comparisons of antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants with control were available. 24 eligible studies including 286 patients (who either received antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants) were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in odds of death comparing antiplatelet drugs with anticoagulants, odds ratio (OR) 2.41, 95% CI 0.27-21.80). There was also no significant difference in the odds of being alive but disabled (OR 1.65, 95% CI 0.50-5.42). Few major haemorrhages were reported. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There were no randomised trials comparing either anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs with control. There is, therefore, no evidence to support their routine use for the treatment of extracranial internal carotid artery dissection. There were also no randomised trials, that directly compared anticoagulants with antiplatelet drugs, and the reported non-randomised studies did not show any evidence of a significant difference between the two. We suggest that a randomised trial including at least 1000 patients in each treatment arm with this condition is clearly needed.

Anticoagulants↗

PubMed2004

Long-term results of 100 consecutive comprehensive neck dissections: implications for selective neck dissections.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal surgical procedure for the neck in patients with squamous head and neck cancers is controversial. Selective neck dissections have replaced modified radical neck dissections as the procedure of choice for the clinically negative (N0) neck and are now being considered for patients with early-stage neck disease. We report the long-term local recurrence rates in 100 consecutive patients undergoing a radical or modified radical neck dissection for clinically positive (N+) and N0 neck disease and review comprehensively the literature reporting and comparing regional control rates for both neck dissection types. PATIENTS: The clinical records of 100 consecutive patients who underwent a comprehensive neck dissection (levels I-V) for squamous head and neck cancers with a minimum of a 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed for primary site of disease, clinical and pathologic neck status, histopathologic grade, neck dissection type, and the site and time of recurrence. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 97 patients on whom 99 neck dissections were performed. Three patients died from unknown causes. Seventy-six patients with N+ disease underwent a therapeutic neck dissection, while 24 patients with clinically N0 disease underwent an elective dissection. The overall neck recurrence rate in patients with controlled primary disease was 7%. The neck or regional failure rate for patients completing the recommended adjuvant radiotherapy was 4%. Six (25%) of 24 patients with clinically N0 disease had occult metastases. The recurrence rate for this group was 4%. CONCLUSION: Further study is needed to determine the optimal surgical management of the N0 and limited N+ neck.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Importance of dissection in learning anatomy: personal dissection versus peer teaching.

Two studies or approaches to time savings in teaching gross anatomy were implemented and tested. Personal dissection vs. peer teaching of the upper and lower extremities revealed subtle effects of dissection on examination performance. Although peer teaching was generally successful, students preferred to dissect for themselves, lacking confidence in being taught by other students. ANOVA and multiple range tests carried out on the examination means indicated no difference between each student's scores on upper and lower extremity questions. However, subtle effects were reflected in significant differences (P < 0.05) in both ratio (upper%/lower%) and difference (upper%-lower%) between each student's percent scores on upper extremity and lower extremity questions, indicating enhanced performance on the extremity dissected. Students dissecting both extremities were intermediate in both ratio and difference, and not significantly different from either the "upper" or "lower" extremity groups. A questionnaire indicated that students who dissected only one extremity would have preferred to have dissected both extremities, and, contrary to overall examination performance, disagreed that they had learned both extremities at a satisfactory level. Although documenting adequate learning with time savings, the results are consistent with the contention that hands-on dissection enhances learning and confidence in the subject matter, because examination performance as well as personal satisfaction was enhanced on the extremity that was dissected.

Anatomy↗