PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DIVERTICULITIS, COLONIC”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1988

Acute colonic diverticulitis.

Colonic diverticulosis is truly a disease of the 20th century. A direct correlation is thought to exist between the incidence of diverticular disease and the amount of dietary fiber. Acute colonic diverticulitis occurs in approximately 25 per cent of the patients with diverticula, and 20 per cent of the patients with diverticulitis will ultimately require surgical intervention. Because of the often virulent nature of the disease in younger patients and the prevalence in the geriatric population, an aggressive approach is advocated. Primary resection of the involved segment of colon is advocated in all cases requiring operation. A primary anastomosis can be constructed in stage I and some cases of stage II disease. This results in lower morbidity and mortality rates as well as fewer days of hospitalization and disability. Newer techniques such as diagnostic CT scanning, percutaneous drainage of diverticular abscess, and greater application of surgical stapling devices have done much to improve the ultimate outcome of colonic diverticulitis.

Abdomen, Acute↗
PubMed2005

Differentiating colonic diverticulitis from colon cancer: the value of computed tomography in the emergency setting.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to establish practical diagnostic criteria to differentiate colonic diverticulitis from colon cancer by computed tomography (CT) in the emergency department (ER). METHODS: Helical CT scans of 40 patients admitted to the ER with the clinical diagnosis of diverticulitis and 14 patients diagnosed with colon cancer were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 18 imaging parameters were analyzed and were compared between the 2 groups of patients. RESULTS: Thirteen parameters were found to be statistically significant for the diagnosis of colonic diverticulitis in excluding colon cancer: pericolic infiltration (p < 0.001); presence of lymph nodes (p < 0.001); inflamed diverticula (p = 0.001); non-inflamed diverticula (p = 0.001); degree of enhancement (p = 0.001); intestinal obstruction (p = 0.001); involved wall thickness (p = 0.005); lymph node size (p = 0.007); fascial thickening (p = 0.009); pattern of enhancement (p = 0.012); involved length (p = 0.014); free air (p = 0.035); and abscess formation (p = 0.042). Among these parameters, the most valuable imaging findings for diverticulitis were the presence of non-inflamed diverticulum, inflamed diverticulum, mild degree of enhancement, and small lymph node size. Three were found to have high specificity but low sensitivity: target enhancement pattern; abscess formation; and free air. When colonic obstruction is present, colon cancer is more likely than diverticulitis. CONCLUSION: Specific CT criteria help to differentiate colonic diverticulitis from colon cancer. CT scan with intravenous contrast administration would be the best noninvasive imaging modality in the ER for the accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of such disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Computed tomography in the imaging of colonic diverticulitis.

Colonic diverticulitis occurs when diverticula within the colon become infected or inflamed. It is becoming an increasingly common cause for hospital admission, particularly in western society, where it is linked to a low fibre diet. Symptoms of diverticulitis include abdominal pain, diarrhoea and pyrexia, however, symptoms are often non-specific and the clinical diagnosis may be difficult. In addition, elderly patients and those taking corticosteroids may have limited findings on physical examination, even in the presence of severe diverticulitis. A high index of suspicion is required in such patients in order to avoid a significant delay in arriving at the correct diagnosis. Imaging plays an important role in establishing an early and correct diagnosis. In the past, contrast enema studies were the principal imaging test used to make the diagnosis. However, such studies lack sensitivity and have limited success in identifying abscesses that may require drainage. Conversely computed tomography (CT) is both sensitive and specific in making a diagnosis of diverticulitis. In addition, it is the imaging technique of choice in depicting complications such as perforation, abscess formation and fistulae. CT-guided drainage of diverticular abscesses helps to reduce sepsis and to permit a one-stage, rather than two-stage, surgical operation. The purpose of this review article is to discuss the role of CT in the imaging of diverticulitis, describe the CT imaging features and complications of this disease, as well as review the impact and rationale of CT imaging and intervention in the overall management of patients with diverticulitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Emergency surgery of complicated colonic diverticulitis.

Colon diverticular disease is an increasingly frequent disorder especially in Western populations characterized by high living standards. In 30-40% of subjects over 60 years of age barium enema detects the presence of diverticula in the sigma. 10-20% of patients affected by colon diverticular disease develop complications such as inflammation or haemorrhage and 20-30% of these patients undergo surgery (60% of patients aged less than 40). Emergency surgery is performed in 50% of cases and it is currently burdened by high mortality rates. We decided to review our cases history to clarify the indication for emergency surgery, the appropriateness to resect the diseased bowel tract and to perform colic anastomosis at the time of emergency resection.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

[Sonography in the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis].

Acute colonic diverticulitis is mainly diagnosed clinically, as endoscopy or coloncontrast enema might be dangerous. In this study diagnostic criteria and typical sonographic findings of acute diverticulitis are summarized. The comparison of these findings - in stadium IIa of diverticulitis - to other sonographic colon findings shows high sensitivity (0.96), specificity (0.98) and predictive values (pV +0.85, pV -0.99) for sonographic findings of acute colonic diverticulitis. Thus sonography can improve diagnostic and follow-up controls of acute diverticulitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Surgical treatment of colonic diverticulitis].

BACKGROUND: Colonic diverticulitis is a serious disease that may require surgical treatment. Early diagnosis and management are necessary to reduce the rates of morbidity-mortality. PURPOSE: This review article was performed in order to discuss the most recent advances in the diagnosis and management of colonic diverticulitis. RESULTS: Patients with acute diverticulitis should be categorized based upon the presence or absence of complications. Patients with complicated diverticulitis should be further categorized into I) pericolonic abscess, II) distant abscess (retroperitoneum or pelvis), III) purulent peritonitis, and IV) fecal peritonitis. In the absence of complications, elective treatment is mainly indicated in patients with recurrent episodes of diverticulitis. In complicated diverticulitis, the surgical alternatives will depend upon the clinical category. The current tendency is to attempt a percutaneous drainage of the abscess, followed by a semi-elective resection. In patients operated upon on emergency basis, resection with a diverting colostomy, with or without anastomosis, is the most widely used procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment for acute diverticulitis should be based upon the presence of complications and their clinical category.

Abdominal Abscess↗
PubMed1991

Early water-soluble contrast enema in the diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis.

Acute colonic diverticulitis is usually suspected by typical clinical findings supported by laboratory tests. Investigations of the colon are usually delayed 1 to 2 months until the acute situation is resolved. We studied 53 patients with an initial clinical diagnosis of acute diverticulitis by performing early water-soluble contrast enema of the colon. The initial diagnosis proved to be uncertain, as 26 patients (49%) had acute colonic diverticulitis as their final diagnosis. There were ten patients who had diverticulosis of the colon, but without radiologic signs of acute diverticulitis. Four of these patients had some other disease responsible for their symptoms. Thirteen patients had normal findings at early water-soluble contrast enema. Three colonic carcinomas and one ischaemic colitis were diagnosed. There were no complications related to the radiologic studies. We conclude that early water-soluble contrast edema of the left colon is safe and useful in investigating patients with suspected acute colonic diverticulitis. If the finding is normal, investigations can be directed elsewhere without undue delay.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Right colon, sigmoid colon, and transverse colon diverticulitis in the same patient: report of a case.

Although sigmoid colon diverticulitis is frequently seen, right colon and transverse colon diverticulitis remain rare forms of the disease. This case report examined the disease course of a 46-year-old female who first presented to our institution in 1990 with perforated right-sided diverticulitis. During the next 11 years, she developed sigmoid colon diverticulitis and then transverse colon diverticulitis. The right and sigmoid colon diverticulitis were treated with surgery and the transverse colon diverticulitis was managed conservatively. This is the first reported case of a single patient who had separate episodes of diverticulitis in the right, transverse, and sigmoid colon. The evaluation and management of this patient has mirrored a trend in the literature and clinical practice.

Colon, Sigmoid↗
PubMed1999

Transverse colon diverticulitis: successful nonoperative management in four patients. Report of four cases.

PURPOSE: Diverticulitis of the transverse colon is a rare disorder and is often confused with other conditions. Previously reported cases of transverse colon diverticulitis were diagnosed and treated by surgical exploration. Four cases are presented that were successfully managed with a nonsurgical approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: Review of the literature in English disclosed 31 cases of transverse colon diverticulitis. The clinical characteristics and management of these patients are reviewed and compared with the current series of patients. The utility of computerized tomography in the diagnosis of diverticulitis is discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Medical therapy with bowel rest and antibiotics is appropriate for transverse colon diverticulitis when free perforation and peritoneal signs are absent and the inflammation is contained, as shown by computerized tomography. Operative exploration should be reserved for patients with diffuse peritonitis or those where perforated colon cancer cannot be excluded.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

[Sonography in the diagnosis and follow-up of colonic diverticulitis].

17 patients with colonic diverticulitis of various degree were examined by conventional abdominal ultrasound in comparison to either colonoscopy or operation. The sonography of the inflammated region showed an echo-poor enlargement of the colonic wall (normal less than 3 mm) ranging from 5 to 15 mm (mean 7.8 mm) over a short distance. In cases with bowel wall enlargement of more than 11 mm a spontaneous evacuation of pus from the diverticles was endoscopically seen. A sonographic enlargement of the colonic wall of more than 15 mm is very suspicious to be a peridiverticulitis or a beginning abscess. In two patients we were able to show single inflammated diverticula by sonography. Thus ultrasonography seems to be an important noninvasive method to diagnose diverticulitis including the complications (perforation, abscess or fistulation) as well as to control the success of conservative treatment.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Sonographic features of acute colonic diverticulitis: the "dome sign".

PURPOSE: This study was performed to clarify the sonographic features of acute colonic diverticulitis to enable its differentiation from appendicitis. METHODS: Of 119 patients who were referred to our hospitals for lower abdominal pain between June 1997 and December 1998 and underwent sonography, 12 patients had a definitive diagnosis of acute colonic diverticulitis and 4 patients a tentative diagnosis. Seventy-eight patients were diagnosed as having acute appendicitis, confirmed by appendectomy. In the 16 patients with diagnoses of diverticulitis, the sonographic and clinical features of acute colonic diverticulitis were studied. RESULTS: Among the 12 patients with definitive diagnoses of acute colonic diverticulitis, sonographic findings included localized thickening of the colonic wall (100%) and a hemispheric mass (the "dome sign") protruding at the thickened colonic wall (100%) and consisting of a hypoechoic wall (100%) and a central echogenic area (66%). The presence of diverticula was confirmed by barium-enema x-ray study in all 12 patients. The 4 patients with tentative diagnoses of acute colonic diverticulitis all had colonic wall thickening but no dome sign. Colonoscopy revealed colitis in 3 of these patients. All 16 patients recovered with conservative treatment, without laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Sonography was useful for differentiating acute colonic diverticulitis from appendicitis. The sonographic finding of the dome sign seems to be specific for acute colonic diverticulitis.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed1992

Surgical management of right colon diverticulitis.

The infrequent occurrence of right colon diverticulitis in the developed West has led to a controversy in the management of this disease. In Singapore, we continued to avoid colectomy whenever possible because this disease is usually nonprogressive. We reviewed 68 patients treated by conservative surgery to evaluate the effectiveness of this treatment policy. Almost 70 percent of our patients were below 40 years of age, and the clinical presentation was indistinguishable from acute appendicitis. Diverticulectomy was done only for inflamed and perforated diverticula (25 cases), while the nonperforated diverticulum was left alone (40 cases). The inflammation invariably responded to antibiotic therapy. Only three patients had colonic resection since a malignant neoplasm could not be excluded. There were no adverse sequelae over a mean follow-up period of three and one-half years, except for one patient who had recurrent attacks of right colon diverticulitis necessitating colectomy. With this policy of management we encountered no mortality, and morbidity was acceptable.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Surgical treatment of acute colonic diverticulitis. Personal experience].

BACKGROUND: Colonic acute diverticulitis presents in patients that suffered from colonic diverticula in 10-25% of cases higher percentage in the elder patient. Colonic acute diverticulitis mortality leads high rates in over 70 years old patients with a value a upper than 75-80%. Perforation and diffuse peritonitis are the more serious complications. Accurate clinical staging followed by correct surgical option are the base of the therapeutical success. METHODS: Between january 1995 and june 2000 we studied by a retrospective analysis 56 patients (34M/22F), mean age 67, hospitalized cause acute perforate colonic diverticulitis, all patients were recorded in order their clinical conditions APS score and Hinchey staging of the disease. At the time of the recovery all patients underwent at clinical examination, abdominal ultrasound, plane X-ray, and bloody tests. Surgical operations performed were: PRA; PRA and protective colostomy; Hartmann procedure. In the patients with APS score > 6-10 and aged > 70 Hartmann procedure was performed. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 9% (5 pazienti), overall morbility was 40%. On the basis of the I and II Hinchey stage mortality rate was 0%. In the III stage was recorded mortality of 4% and 33% in IV stage. Complication were: 6 anastomotic lekage; 7 infections of the laparotomic wound; 1 incisional hernia; 2 lekeages of the stomoa; 3 stomatitis; 5 proctitis. CONCLUSION: Therapeutical choise treatment has to consider Hinchey stage and APS score. Hartmann procedure is indicated in stage III-IV with score APS > 8-10. For the other patients primary resection anastomosis and if is necessary associated colostomy is the treatment recommended.

Acute Disease↗