PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DNA, Bacterial”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

DNA polymerase I: structure, activity, and function in bacterial DNA replication and repair.

Faithful replication and repair of the genome are essential processes for all life. Genome maintenance is coordinated by a complex suite of proteins, with bacteria evolving intricate systems despite their relatively simplistic genomes. DNA polymerases are a key class of proteins that mediate genome maintenance. DNA polymerases are all capable of extending nascent strands of DNA but contribute to DNA replication and repair in distinct ways depending on their active site and substrate specificity. The first discovered polymerase, bacterial DNA polymerase I (Pol I), has long been considered the primary enzyme responsible for Okazaki fragment maturation and resynthesis in many DNA repair pathways. These conclusions derive primarily from studies using the gram-negative bacterium, Escherichia coli. Given that some bacterial lineages diverged from E. coli over a billion years ago, these assumptions may not account for evolution in functional diversity. In this review, we examine the structural features of bacterial Pol I and discuss how each of its distinct enzymatic activities contribute to genome maintenance. Throughout, we introduce differences that have been discovered between gram-negative and gram-positive species and explore how activity differences may translate to functional adaptations in replication or repair. We focus on evidence from gram-positive bacteria, particularly Bacillus subtilis and Geobacillus stearothermophilus, that challenges the universality of Pol I's functions and reveals lineage-specific adaptations in replication and repair mechanisms. By synthesizing historical perspectives with recent discoveries, this review underscores both the importance of Pol I and the evolutionary diversification of Pol I in bacterial DNA metabolism.

Bacterial DNA replication↗
PubMed1975

Uptake of bacterial DNA by Chlamydomonas reinhardi.

Escherichia coli [3H]DNA supplied to vegetative cultures of wild-type (mt+) and CW15 (mt+;mutant lacking the cell wall) Chlamydomonas reinhardi could bind to the cell wall of the wild-type and to the cell membrane of CW15 mutant cells. The extent of this binding decreased with time and was to a large degree (over 90%) DNA-ase-sensitive. Nevertheless, about 0.01% of the bacterial DNA remained irreversibly associated with the cells when they reached stationary phase. The irreversible binding of the donor bacterial DNA to Chlamydomonas cells could be increased by treatment of the cultures with polycations such as DEAE-dextran, poly-L-lysine and poly-L-ornithine. Although the CW15 cells rapidly degraded bacterial DNA in the culture medium wild-type cells showed only a small effect on the molecular weight of the donor DNA. The acid-insoluble radioactivity irreversibly bound to WT (+) cells consisted mainly of oligonucleotides with a small proportion present as less depolymerized donor DNA. No radioactivity, however, was found to be associated with the recipient high molecular weight Chlamydomonas DNA. No labeled donor DNA could be recognized in the cells given bacterial [3H]DNA in early stationary phase. Instead, radioactivity found in Chlamydomonas DNA corresponded to reutilization of [3H]thymine derivatives released as a result of [3H]DNA degradation. No evidence for the integration of detectable amounts of donor DNA sequences into the host cell DNA was obtained.

Bacillus subtilis↗
PubMed1979

Bacterial DNA synthesized under phage control in a DNA-defective Salmonella-mutant and packaged into a special fraction of transducing particles of phage P22.

Lysates of P22 contain a small fraction of transducing particles with bacterial DNA replicated semiconservatively after the time of infection. It was demonstrated that the presence and relative amount of this class of transducing particles was unchanged, if infection of Salmonella occured under a condition nonpermissive for bacterial DNA replication. Analysis of particles with DNA fragments derived from different regions of the Salmonella chromosome indicated that the replication of the bacterial DNA carried by these transducing particles was not initiated specifically at the normal origin for bacterial chromosome replication.

DNA Replication↗
PubMed2025

Large Quantities of Bacterial DNA and Protein in Common Dietary Protein Source Used in Microbiome Studies.

Diet has been shown to greatly impact the intestinal microbiota. To understand the role of individual dietary components, defined diets with purified components are frequently used in diet-microbiota studies. Defined diets frequently use purified casein as the protein source. Previous work indicated that casein contains microbial DNA potentially impacting results of microbiome studies. Other diet-based microbially derived molecules that may impact microbiome measurements, such as proteins detected by metaproteomics, have not been determined for casein. Additionally, other protein sources used in microbiome studies have not been characterized for their microbial content. We used metagenomics and metaproteomics to identify and quantify microbial DNA and protein in a casein-based defined diet to better understand potential impacts on metagenomic and metaproteomic microbiome studies. We further tested six additional defined diets with purified protein sources with an integrated metagenomic-metaproteomic approach and found that contaminating microbial protein is unique to casein within the tested set as microbial protein was not identified in diets with other protein sources. We also illustrate the contribution of diet-derived microbial protein in diet-microbiota studies by metaproteomic analysis of stool samples from germ-free mice (GF) and mice with a conventional microbiota (CV) following consumption of diets with casein and non-casein protein. This study highlights a potentially confounding factor in diet-microbiota studies that must be considered through evaluation of the diet itself within a given study.

Animals↗
PubMed1975

On the question of the integration of exogenous bacterial DNA into plant DNA.

Extensive studies with pea, tomato, and barley failed to confirm the evidence presented by previous investigators for integration or replication of exogenously applied bacterial DNA in these plants. Labeled DNA of buoyant density in CsCl intermediate between that of high density donor bacterial DNA and of plant DNA was never observed with axenic plants. Intermediate peaks, similar to those used as evidence for recombination by earlier investigators, were observed only when the plants were contaminated with bacteria. Plant DNA prepared by a published procedure [Ledoux, L. & Huart, R. (1969) J. Mol. Biol. 43, 243-262] was found to be contaminated with unidentified impurities. Such DNA was partially protected from the action of DNase and produced aberrant banding patterns in CsCl after shearing. Much of the published evidence for integration of foreign DNA in plants is based upon experiments with plant DNA prepared by this procedure. We conclude that contamination is the likely explanation for what has been interpreted as evidence for integration.

Centrifugation, Density Gradient↗
PubMed1977

Transcription of bacterial DNA by isolated plant nuclei.

Plant nuclei prepared from protoplasts can be used as a cell-free system for testing their template activity of procaryotic DNA for plant polymerases. We were able to demonstrate that plant polymerases of Petunia hybrida are capable of transcribing linear bacterial DNA, whereas supercoiled DNA could not be used as a template.

Cell Nucleus↗