PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DNA Replication Timing”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1988

Regulation of mouse satellite DNA replication time.

The satellite DNA sequences located near the centromeric regions of mouse chromosomes replicate very late in S in both fibroblast and lymphocyte cells and are heavily methylated at CpG residues. F9 teratocarcinoma cells, on the other hand, contain satellite sequences which are undermethylated and replicate much earlier in S. DNA methylation probably plays some role in the control of satellite replication time since 5-azacytidine treatment of RAG fibroblasts causes a dramatic temporal shift of replication to mid S. In contrast to similar changes accompanying the inactivation of the X-chromosome, early replication of satellite DNA is not associated with an increase in local chromosomal DNase I sensitivity. Fusion of F9 with mouse lymphocytes caused a dramatic early shift in the timing of the normally late replicating lymphocyte satellite heterochromatin, suggesting that trans-activating factors may be responsible for the regulation of replication timing.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Precise switching of DNA replication timing in the GC content transition area in the human major histocompatibility complex.

The human genome is composed of long-range G+C% (GC%) mosaic structures thought to be related to chromosome bands. We previously reported a boundary of megabase-sized GC% mosaic domains at the junction area between major histocompatibility complex (MHC) classes II and III, proposing it as a possible chromosome band boundary. DNA replication timing during the S phase is known to be correlated cytogenetically with chromosome band zones, and thus the band boundaries have been predicted to contain a switch point for DNA replication timing. In this study, to identify to the nucleotide sequence level the replication switch point during the S phase, we determined the precise DNA replication timing for MHC classes II and III, focusing on the junction area. To do this, we used PCR-based quantitation of nascent DNA obtained from synchronized human myeloid leukemia HL60 cells. The replication timing changed precisely in the boundary region with a 2-h difference between the two sides, supporting the prediction that this region may be a chromosome band boundary. We supposed that replication fork movement terminates (pauses) or significantly slows in the switch region, which contains dense Alu clusters; polypurine/polypyrimidine tracts; di-, tri-, or tetranucleotide repeats; and medium-reiteration-frequency sequences. Because the nascent DNA in the switch region was recovered at low efficiency, we investigated whether this region is associated with the nuclear scaffold and found three scaffold-associated regions in and around the switch region.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1994

Allele specificity of DNA replication timing in the Angelman/Prader-Willi syndrome imprinted chromosomal region.

DNA replication within chromosome 15q11-q13, a region subject to genomic imprinting, was examined by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Asynchronous replication between homologues was observed in cells from normal individuals and in Prader-Willi (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) patients with chromosome 15 deletions but not in PWS patients with maternal uniparental disomy. Opposite patterns of allele-specific replication timing between homologous loci were observed; paternal early/maternal late at D15S63, D15S10 and the gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor beta 3 subunit gene (GABRB3); and maternal early/paternal late at the more distal gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor alpha 5 subunit gene (GABRA5). At the most distal locus examined, D15S12, both patterns of allele-specific replication timing were detected.

Alleles↗
PubMed1995

Models of DNA replication timing in interphase nuclei: an exercise in inferring process from state.

Patterns of spots, produced by fluorescence in situ hybridization, can be used to infer the order and timing of replication of DNA sequences in S-phase nuclei, sampled randomly from asynchronous cell populations. We describe statistical models that provide estimates of replication timings and completion rates and of their standard errors. By applying the technique to experimental data from diploid cell lines, we show how it can be used to compare the replication timings either of different sequences on the same chromosome, or of the same sequence on a pair of homologous chromosomes.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Delineation of DNA replication time zones by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization has been used to visualize specific genomic DNA sequences in interphase nuclei. In normal diploid cells, unreplicated DNA segments give singlet hybridization signals while replicated loci are characterized by doublets. The distribution of these two patterns in unsynchronized cell populations can be used to determine the S phase replication time of any DNA sequence. The validity of this approach was established by analyzing genes whose replication profiles in expressing and non-expressing cells had been determined previously by conventional methods. Using this technique it has been possible to map the replication timing topography of the DNA within and flanking the cystic fibrosis (CF) gene locus on chromosome 7. The gene itself is located within a defined time zone which is approximately 500 kb in length and is under developmental control. It is early replicating in cells which express CF but late replicating in other cell types. These time zones probably represent basic units of chromosome structure.

Bromodeoxyuridine↗
PubMed2001

Developmental regulation of DNA replication timing at the human beta globin locus.

The human beta globin locus replicates late in most cell types, but becomes early replicating in erythroid cells. Using FISH to map DNA replication timing around the endogenous beta globin locus and by applying a genetic approach in transgenic mice, we have demonstrated that both the late and early replication states are controlled by regulatory elements within the locus control region. These results also show that the pattern of replication timing is set up by mechanisms that work independently of gene transcription.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

DNA replication timing: random thoughts about origin firing.

Regions of metazoan genomes replicate at defined times within S phase. This observation suggests that replication origins fire with a defined timing pattern that remains the same from cycle to cycle. However, an alterative model based on the stochastic firing of origins may also explain replication timing. This model assumes varying origin efficiency instead of a strict origin-timing programme. Here, we discuss the evidence for both models.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Modulation of chromosome damage localization by DNA replication timing.

PURPOSE: Non-random occurrence of induced chromosome breakpoints (BP) has been repeatedly reported. DNA synthesis and chromatin remodeling may influence chromosome BP localization. The CHO9 X chromosome exhibits an early replicating short euchromatic arm (Xpe) and a late replicating long heterochromatic arm (Xqh). We investigated the role played by DNA replication and related chromatin remodeling processes on BP distribution in eu/heterochromatin using the CHO9 X chromosome as a model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BP induced by etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, as well as by the S-dependent clastogens ultraviolet-C light (UV-C) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) were mapped to CHO9 X chromosome arms. The base analogue 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdUrd) was pulse-added immediately after UV-C irradiation or during etoposide and MMS treatments (40 min) to identify cells in early S-phase (Xpe labeled) or late S-phase (Xqh labeled) after indirect BrdUrd immunodetection in metaphase spreads using primary anti-BrdUrd and secondary fluorochrome-tagged antibodies. RESULTS: During early S-phase, BP induced by etoposide and MMS mapped preferentially to Xpe while BP produced by UV-C localized randomly. BP induced by all agents during late S-phase clustered in Xqh. CONCLUSIONS: Results obtained suggest that replication time of eu/heterochromatin as well as chromatin remodeling may determine BP localization on the CHO9 X chromosome.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Paternal imprints can be established on the maternal Igf2-H19 locus without altering replication timing of DNA.

Genomic imprinting in mammals marks the parental alleles in gametes, resulting in differential gene expression in offspring. A number of epigenetic features are associated with imprinted genes. These include differential DNA methylation, histone acetylation and methylation, subnuclear localization and DNA replication timing. While DNA methylation has been shown to be necessary both for establishment and maintenance of imprinting, the connections with the other types of epigenetic marking systems are not clear. Specifically, it is not known whether the other marking systems, either on their own or in conjunction with DNA methylation, are required for imprinting. Here we show that in the mouse mutant Minute (Mnt) the Igf2-H19 locus acquires a paternal methylation imprint in the maternal germline. DNA methylation of the H19 DMR is established in oogenesis, maintained during postzygotic development on the maternal allele, and erased in primordial germ cells. The fact that a paternal type methylation imprint can also be established in the maternal germline indicates that trans-acting factors that target methylation to this imprinted region are likely to be the same in both germlines. Surprisingly, however, asynchrony of DNA replication of the locus is maintained despite the altered expression and methylation imprint of Igf2 and H19. These results show clearly that replication asynchrony of this region is neither the determinant factor for, nor a consequence of, epigenetic modifications that are critical for genomic imprinting. Replication asynchrony may thus be regulated differently from methylation imprints and have a separate function.

Alleles↗
PubMed1994

DNA replication time accounts for tumor growth variation induced by dietary fat in a breast carcinoma model.

Female Fischer rats were pair-fed on diets containing either safflower oil (SO) or fish oil (FO) for 6 weeks. Implanted breast 13762 MAT tumors had a doubling times of 35.4 and 55.5 h in SO and FO rats, respectively (P < 0.001). Proliferation kinetics were measured in vivo by bromedeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) labeling and bivariate DNA/BrdUrd analysis by flow cytometry. After 1 h of pulsing, the labeling index was similar in both groups. However, 6 h later, tumor cells from FO rats had significantly lower relative movement of BrdUrd-labeled cells (0.78 vs. 0.91, P < 0.001). These results reflected a significantly longer S phase duration (15.0 vs. 9.1 h, P < 0.001) in FO rats and accounted for all the difference in tumor growth rates. This mechanism, which has not previously been reported, implies a significant role for fatty acids in DNA replication.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

ATR and ATM regulate the timing of DNA replication origin firing.

Timing of DNA replication initiation is dependent on S-phase-promoting kinase (SPK) activity at discrete origins and the simultaneous function of many replicons. DNA damage prevents origin firing through the ATM- and ATR-dependent inhibition of Cdk2 and Cdc7 SPKs. Here, we establish that modulation of ATM- and ATR-signalling pathways controls origin firing in the absence of DNA damage. Inhibition of ATM and ATR with caffeine or specific neutralizing antibodies, or upregulation of Cdk2 or Cdc7, promoted rapid and synchronous origin firing; conversely, inhibition of Cdc25A slowed DNA replication. Cdk2 was in equilibrium between active and inactive states, and the concentration of replication protein A (RPA)-bound single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) correlated with Chk1 activation and inhibition of origin firing. Furthermore, ATM was transiently activated during ongoing replication. We propose that ATR and ATM regulate SPK activity through a feedback mechanism originating at active replicons. Our observations establish that ATM- and ATR-signalling pathways operate during an unperturbed cell cycle to regulate initiation and progression of DNA synthesis, and are therefore poised to halt replication in the presence of DNA damage.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

DNA replication-timing analysis of human chromosome 22 at high resolution and different developmental states.

Duplication of the genome during the S phase of the cell cycle does not occur simultaneously; rather, different sequences are replicated at different times. The replication timing of specific sequences can change during development; however, the determinants of this dynamic process are poorly understood. To gain insights into the contribution of developmental state, genomic sequence, and transcriptional activity to replication timing, we investigated the timing of DNA replication at high resolution along an entire human chromosome (chromosome 22) in two different cell types. The pattern of replication timing was correlated with respect to annotated genes, gene expression, novel transcribed regions of unknown function, sequence composition, and cytological features. We observed that chromosome 22 contains regions of early- and late-replicating domains of 100 kb to 2 Mb, many (but not all) of which are associated with previously described chromosomal bands. In both cell types, expressed sequences are replicated earlier than nontranscribed regions. However, several highly transcribed regions replicate late. Overall, the DNA replication-timing profiles of the two different cell types are remarkably similar, with only nine regions of difference observed. In one case, this difference reflects the differential expression of an annotated gene that resides in this region. Novel transcribed regions with low coding potential exhibit a strong propensity for early DNA replication. Although the cellular function of such transcripts is poorly understood, our results suggest that their activity is linked to the replication-timing program.

Cell Differentiation↗
PubMed2019

Replication timing networks reveal a link between transcription regulatory circuits and replication timing control.

DNA replication occurs in a defined temporal order known as the replication timing (RT) program and is regulated during development, coordinated with 3D genome organization and transcriptional activity. However, transcription and RT are not sufficiently coordinated to predict each other, suggesting an indirect relationship. Here, we exploit genome-wide RT profiles from 15 human cell types and intermediate differentiation stages derived from human embryonic stem cells to construct different types of RT regulatory networks. First, we constructed networks based on the coordinated RT changes during cell fate commitment to create highly complex RT networks composed of thousands of interactions that form specific functional subnetwork communities. We also constructed directional regulatory networks based on the order of RT changes within cell lineages, and identified master regulators of differentiation pathways. Finally, we explored relationships between RT networks and transcriptional regulatory networks (TRNs) by combining them into more complex circuitries of composite and bipartite networks. Results identified novel trans interactions linking transcription factors that are core to the regulatory circuitry of each cell type to RT changes occurring in those cell types. These core transcription factors were found to bind cooperatively to sites in the affected replication domains, providing provocative evidence that they constitute biologically significant directional interactions. Our findings suggest a regulatory link between the establishment of cell-type-specific TRNs and RT control during lineage specification.

Cell Differentiation↗
PubMed1991

The nuclear membrane determines the timing of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts.

We have exploited a property of chicken erythrocyte nuclei to analyze the regulation of DNA replication in a cell-free system from Xenopus eggs. Many individual demembranated nuclei added to the extract often became enclosed within a common nuclear membrane. Nuclei within such a "multinuclear aggregate" lacked individual membranes but shared the perimeter membrane of the aggregate. Individual nuclei that were excluded from the aggregates initiated DNA synthesis at different times over a 10-12-h period, as judged by incorporation of biotinylated dUTP into discrete replication foci at early times, followed by uniformly intense incorporation at later times. Replication forks were clustered in spots, rings, and horseshoe-shaped structures similar to those described in cultured cells. In contrast to the asynchronous replication seen between individual nuclei, replication within multinuclear aggregates was synchronous. There was a uniform distribution and similar fluorescent intensity of the replication foci throughout all the nuclei enclosed within the same membrane. However, different multinuclear aggregates replicated out of synchrony with each other indicating that each membrane-bound aggregate acts as an individual unit of replication. These data indicate that the nuclear membrane defines the unit of DNA replication and determines the timing of DNA synthesis in egg extract resulting in highly coordinated triggering of DNA replication on the DNA it encloses.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

A deletion at the mouse Xist gene exposes trans-effects that alter the heterochromatin of the inactive X chromosome and the replication time and DNA stability of both X chromosomes.

The inactive X chromosome of female mammals displays several properties of heterochromatin including late replication, histone H4 hypoacetylation, histone H3 hypomethylation at lysine-4, and methylated CpG islands. We show that cre-Lox-mediated excision of 21 kb from both Xist alleles in female mouse fibroblasts led to the appearance of two histone modifications throughout the inactive X chromosome usually associated with euchromatin: histone H4 acetylation and histone H3 lysine-4 methylation. Despite these euchromatic properties, the inactive X chromosome was replicated even later in S phase than in wild-type female cells. Homozygosity for the deletion also caused regions of the active X chromosome that are associated with very high concentrations of LINE-1 elements to be replicated very late in S phase. Extreme late replication is a property of fragile sites and the 21-kb deletions destabilized the DNA of both X chromosomes, leading to deletions and translocations. This was accompanied by the phosphorylation of p53 at serine-15, an event that occurs in response to DNA damage, and the accumulation of gamma-H2AX, a histone involved in DNA repair, on the X chromosome. The Xist locus therefore maintains the DNA stability of both X chromosomes.

Acetylation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Maintaining transcriptional states through DNA replication.

The timing of DNA replication has been implicated in gene regulation based on observations that actively transcribed genes generally replicate earlier in S-phase than their inactive counterparts. However, we recently showed that differentiation-induced gene silencing in lymphocytes does not generally result in silenced genes switching from early to late replication, but instead alters the onset of separation of newly synthesised sister-chromatids. Our findings may provide novel insights into the mechanisms that allow inactive chromatin structure to be propagated through DNA replication.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

DNA replication: telling time with microarrays.

A long-standing hypothesis about eukaryotic DNA replication is that the late-replicating regions are transcriptionally inert and that repressing transcription delays replication initiation. But do contrasting results from yeast and a recent study in Drosophila imply that replication timing and transcriptional activity are differentially regulated in yeast and higher eukaryotes?

Animals↗