PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Dander”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1986

Immunotherapy with partially purified and standardized animal dander extracts. I. Clinical results from a double-blind study on patients with animal dander asthma.

Forty-one patients (21 adults and 20 children) with cat dander-or dog dander-induced asthma were selected for immunotherapy with standardized and partially purified cat- or dog-dander extracts by use of a double-blind protocol. Based on sex, age, clinical history, results of bronchial challenge, and crossed radioimmunoelectrophoresis studies, the patients were stratified in matched pairs, and the treatment alternatives were distributed randomly among the pairs. Twenty-two patients treated with allergen (15 with cat allergen and seven with dog allergen) and 17 patients receiving placebo therapy completed the first year of treatment. In the cat allergen-treated group, the bronchial sensitivity toward cat and histamine decreased (p less than 0.001 and p less than 0.05, respectively). Measured by bronchial challenge, the cat allergen-treated patients could tolerate 11 times more allergen at the end than at the start of the study, and they also demonstrated a tendency toward less pronounced symptoms after exposure to cat and dog allergens. No significant changes were observed in the dog allergen treated- or placebo-treated groups. The adverse effects in general were negligible except for some systemic side effects during rush hyposensitization, especially among the children, but these were mild and responded promptly to treatment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

Immediate hypersensitivity skin reactions to human dander in atopic dermatitis. Partial purification and characterization of human dander allergens.

Using high-speed gel filtration chromatography, an aqueous extract of human dander was divided into four fractions (fractions I to IV). Scratch tests with the crude human dander extract and each fraction were performed in 147 patients with atopic dermatitis and 100 control subjects. The crude extract provoked positive reactions in 61.9% (91/147) of patients with atopic dermatitis and 6% (6/100) of control subjects. The most potent allergenic component was present in fraction II, which induced positive reactions in 61.2% (90/147) of patients with atopic dermatitis. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis demonstrated that fraction II contained two proteins with molecular weights of 10,000 and 13,000, respectively.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1977

The human dander atopy. II. human dander, a complicating factor in the study of the relationship between house dust and dermatophagoides allergens.

Besides describing some pitfalls frequently ignored in investigations on the house dust Dermatophagoides allergen problem, the author demonstrates that skin reactions due to the very small amount of "residual allergen activity" in house dust can be explained by the fact that house dust always contains a small percentage of human dander.

Dust↗
PubMed1996

Role of animal danders as inhalant allergens in bronchial asthma in India.

The etiological significance of animal danders in Indian patients with nasobronchial disorders has not yet been investigated. In the present study, the role of animal danders in the etiology of bronchial asthma was studied. Extracts of danders from 6 animals along with guinea pig whole pelt were prepared. Intradermal and bronchial provocation tests with these extracts were performed on (i) 68 asthmatics and (ii) 20 nonallergic healthy volunteers. In patients, significant positive skin reactions (2+ to 4+) ranged from 1.4% each with guinea pig whole pelt and ox dander to 8.8% with dog dander extracts. None of the healthy volunteers elicited such a response. On bronchial provocation, 20% and 53.8% of the tests were positive in asthmatics showing 1+ and 2+ skin reactivity, respectively. All the patients as well as controls eliciting negative intradermal responses demonstrated uniformly negative bronchial provocation tests to different dander extracts. Analysis of various clinical features of asthmatics with respect to skin positivity to dander/pelt extract was also carried out. Radioallergosorbent tests (RASTs) were performed to estimate dander-specific IgE levels in the sera of patients showing different grades of skin response to dander extracts of dog, horse, and goat. Sixty percent of sera from the patients showing 2+ to 4+ skin reactivity to various animal dander extracts showed positive RASTs. RAST positivity as well as RAST ratio increased with increase in the intensity of skin response. All the patients with positive cutaneous as well as positive bronchial responses also showed positive RASTs. Similarly, all the patients with positive skin and positive RASTs showed positive bronchoprovocation tests. These results suggested that animal danders play an important role in the etiology of bronchial asthma. Some of the clinical characteristics of asthmatics, such as (i) early age at onset of asthma, (ii) positive family history, and (iii) asthma with associated allergies, have significant bearing on the cutaneous response to various dander extracts.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Detection of IgE antibodies specific for allergens in cow milk and cow dander.

Sera from patients with cow milk protein allergy (n = 6) and cow dander allergy (n = 5) were analyzed for reactivity of IgE antibodies specific for allergens derived from milk and cow dander. The cow milk- and cow dander-allergic patients exhibited elevated specific IgE levels to milk and to cow dander, respectively, as determined by RAST. IgE immunoblot analysis revealed that cow milk-allergic patients exhibited IgE binding to the milk allergens casein, beta-lactoglobulin, alpha-lactalbumin and bovine serum albumin. Four of six cow milk-reactive patients also exhibited IgE binding to cow dander proteins with molecular weights of 20, 22, 36, 50 and > 200 kD. IgE from the sera of cow dander-allergic patients reacted with the major allergens of cow dander (20 and 22 kD) and with other proteins with molecular weights of 24, 36, 42, 50 and 70 kD. Only one out of five of these sera displayed IgE reactivity with cow milk proteins with molecular weights of 69, 92 and > 200 kD. Inhibition studies revealed the cross-reactive nature of the IgE antibodies. Preincubation of cow milk-positive sera with cow milk and subsequent immunoblotting led to complete blocking of IgE binding to cow dander proteins and to cow milk proteins. Preincubation of cow milk-positive sera with cow dander extract led to blocking of IgE binding only to defined cow milk proteins: these could be identified in 2 cases as casein and in 1 case as beta-lactoglobulin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

False-positive skin prick test responses to commercially available dog dander extracts caused by contamination with house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) allergens.

BACKGROUND: In an outpatient population, a high frequency of positive skin prick test responses to dog dander was found in the absence of detectable IgE to dog dander in the RAST. The majority of these patients were sensitized to house dust mites (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) and had no obvious dog-related allergic symptoms. These findings prompted us to investigate whether dog dander skin test preparations are contaminated with house dust mite allergens in amounts sufficient to cause false-positive skin prick test responses in patients sensitized to house dust mites. METHODS: Antigen detection assays with monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies were used to determine concentrations of the major allergen Can f 1 from dog dander and the major allergens Der p 1 and Der p 2 from house dust mites in five commercially available dog dander skin prick test preparations (A to E). RESULTS: Can f 1 concentrations varied for the different extracts (A: 170 micrograms/ml, B: 11.1 micrograms/ml, C: 13.3 micrograms/ml, D: 3.8 micrograms/ml, and E: 59.4 micrograms/ml). Der p 1 was detectable in all extracts (A: 33.4 ng/ml, B:5.1 ng/ml, C:29.6 ng/ml, D: 0.4 ng/ml, and E: 1.9 ng/ml), and Der p 2 was detectable in some of the commercially available dog dander skin prick test preparations tested (A: 31.3 ng/ml, B: 3.0 ng/ml, and C: 7.5 ng/ml). The median house dust mite threshold in the skin prick test was found to be 5.8 ng/ml, of Der p 1 (range, 3.5 to 20.8 ng/ml) in nine patients tested. CONCLUSION: Contamination of commercially available dog dander skin prick test preparations with the major allergens (Der p 1 and Der p 2) of the house dust mite (D. pteronyssinus) was demonstrated. These contaminations cause false-positive responses to skin prick tests with dog dander in patients sensitized to house dust mite.

Allergens↗
PubMed1996

Occupational asthma due to deer dander.

BACKGROUND: The literature on allergy to deer is limited. The allergenic component remains to be identified. METHODS: We report a case of occupational asthma and rhinitis caused by deer dander. A 44-year-old male farmer had raised three red deer on his farm for 2 years, prior to occurrence of asthmatic symptoms. Dander extract was prepared from the patient's deer. RESULTS: Skin-prick test elicited positive reactions to dander extracts from goat, sheep, camel, and cow as well as to deer dander extract. Bronchoprovocation test with deer dander extract elicited an early asthmatic response. Serum-specific IgE antibody to the deer dander extract was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and immunoblot analysis showed five IgE binding components (110, 72, 59, 45, and 21 kilodalton) within the deer dander extract. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that deer dander can induce occupational asthma through an IgE-mediated mechanism in a farmer raising deer.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Characterization of cat dander-specific T lymphocytes from atopic patients.

Fel d I, the major cat dander allergen, is recognized by serum IgE of more than 80% of all cat-allergic patients. Because IgE synthesis by B lymphocytes is under the control of T lymphocytes, we studied the specificity and lymphokine production profiles of cat dander-specific T lymphocytes. Polyclonal cat dander-specific T cell lines were found to react with purified Fel d I, but not with cat albumin, the only other characterized cat allergen. Similarly, within a panel of CD4+ T lymphocyte clones (TLC) that was generated from these cat dander-specific T cell lines, 5 of 16 TLC were found to react with Fel d I, and 0 of 16 with cat albumin. The remaining 11 TLC were shown to recognize at least two different proteins. In general, the TLC had a high IL-4/IFN-gamma production ratio, and could recognize the cat dander extract in an HLA-DR, HLA-DQ, or HLA-DP restricted manner. In addition, five distinct T cell epitopes of Fel d I were identified by using a panel of overlapping synthetic peptides of both chains of Fel d I. The data presented here indicate that, even though multiple proteins in cat dander extract are recognized by T lymphocytes of allergic patients, Fel d I, the major IgE binding allergen, is also important in T cell activation. The fact that the cat-specific TLC are Th2-like indicates that these cells may play an important role in the pathophysiology of allergic responses to cat allergens. However, the diversity of HLA-class II restriction of cat dander- and Fel d I-specific TLC and the presence of multiple T cell epitopes in the allergen may complicate future immunotherapies.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Occupational allergy caused by cow dander: detection and identification of the allergenic fractions.

We describe two cases involving cow farmers, both males, one aged 28 and the other 45, who attended our center because his presented symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma with 18 months and 4 year of evolution respectively, related to this laboral environment. The study included the following tests: skin tests (prick tests) to inhalant allergens (mites, pollens, moulds, dog and cat epithelium), foods, cow epithelium-dander, cow serum, beef and milk proteins. We determined the total seric IgE, specific IgE (RAST-CAP System) to cow meat and cow dander. Nasal provocation test with freeze-dried biological standardized extract of cow epithelium-dander were carried out. We observed the symptoms and realized control with a previous active computerized rhinomanometry. Cow dander proteins used for the provocation test were separated by means of SDS-PAGE or isoelectric focusing (IEF). The allergenic component were identified by immunoblotting with the patients' serum. The skin tests were positive to cow dander, and negative to the other allergens tested, including cow serum, cow milk and beef. The seric IgE were 383 and 477 kU/L, and the RAST was positive to cow dander, 20.10 and 36.4 kU/L (class 4). The provocation test were positive with a concentration of 500 SBU. We observed that the IgE of the two patients reacted with the same allergens: 3 major bands were identified with MW of 11, 15, 62.3 kDa. All these bands correspond to protein with acid pl.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Monkey dander asthma.

We recently cared for two patients who experienced acute asthma with exposure to dander of the cotton top tamarin, a species of New World monkey. Both patients had serologic evidence for an IgE antibody to monkey dander as determined by RAST and a positive immediate skin test response to an extract prepared from monkey dander. Furthermore, by RAST we were able to determine that cotton top tamarin urine and newborn cotton top tamarin dander had antigens that reacted with IgE in the serum of the affected patients. Thus we report two patients with asthma to monkey dander that appears to be mediated by an IgE mechanism. We also found that serum from a subject exposed to another species of New World monkey, the capuchin, yielded a positive RAST to the cotton top tamarin, suggesting that allergenic cross-reactivity may exist between the two species.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1982

Staphylococcal and human dander IgE antibodies in superinfected atopic dermatitis.

Ten patients (Group 1) with Staphylococcus aureus superinfected atopic dermatitis (SAD) were compared with three control groups without SAD. One control group (Group 2) was comprised of ten atopic patients with total IgE levels of greater than 1000 u/ml, another control group, of six atopic patients (Group 3) with total IgE levels of less than 1000 u/ml and a third group, of ten non-atopics (Group 4), five of whom were infected with Staphylococcus aureus. Total and specific anti-staphylococcal IgE levels and anti-human dander IgE were high in Group 1. Specific IgE levels to S. aureus were slightly increased in some Group 2 patients but were normal (less than 7%) for Group 3. No specific IgE to human dander antigen was detected in either Group 2 or Group 3. In the non-atopic control group (Group 4), six out of ten patients had both low total, and specific IgE antibodies to both staphylococcal, and human dander antigens. Two had increased total IgE and specific anti-staphylococcal IgE antibodies, and two more with a severe, chronic infection, also had anti-staphylococcal IgE antibodies. In SAD patients, a good correlation was seen between cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity and high specific IgE antibodies against staphylococcal and human dander allergens. Delayed type hypersensitivity reactions to staphylococcal antigen were negative or poorly positive in the SAD group by comparison to controls. A paradoxical anaphylactic type of response to the offending bacterial agent in SAD patients, associated with 'auto-atopy' to human dander, is discussed.

Antibodies, Bacterial↗
PubMed2007

Detection of an allergen in dog dander that cross-reacts with the major cat allergen, Fel d 1.

BACKGROUND: A considerable proportion of animal-allergic patients are sensitized to both cat and dog allergens but knowledge about cross-reactive allergens in cat and dog dander is limited. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether dog dander contains an allergen that cross-reacts with the major cat allergen, Fel d 1. METHODS: Recombinant Fel d 1 with the same immunological properties as natural Fel d 1 was used for quantitative (CAP) IgE competition experiments performed with sera obtained from cat-allergic patients (n=36). A Fel d 1 cross-reactive dog allergen was characterized by one- and two-dimensional immunoblotting using rFel d 1 for IgE inhibition experiments and with monospecific, polyclonal rabbit anti-recombinant Fel d 1 antibodies. RESULTS: In 25% of Fel d 1-reactive cat-allergic patients, more than 50% inhibition of IgE reactivity to dog allergens was achieved with recombinant Fel d 1. An Fel d 1 cross-reactive 20 kDa allergen with a pI of approximately 3.4 was detected in dander extracts of several different dog breeds. CONCLUSION: This is the first report demonstrating the presence of an Fel d 1-like allergen in dog dander extracts, which may be responsible for double positivity to cat and dog in serology. However, the clinical relevance of this cross-sensitization needs to be confirmed. These results are important for the diagnostic and therapeutic use of dog dander allergen extracts.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Allergy to storage mites or cow dander as a cause of rhinitis among Finnish dairy farmers.

The role of storage mites Acarus siro, Lepidoglyphus destructor, and Tyrophagus putrescentiae, compared with that of cow dander, as a cause of allergic rhinitis was studied by nasal challenges in a population of 106 non-smoking dairy farmers. Thirty-six of the subjects were challenged with storage mites alone, each with only one of the three species in consecutive order, 43 with cow dander alone, and 27 with both. Thus mite challenges were performed on 63 farmers and cow dander challenges on 70. Challenges with any one of the storage mite species were positive in 18% and with cow dander in 20% of farmers with allergic rhinitis. All challenges to asymptomatic farmers were negative. Five of the eight positive reactions to storage mites were due to Lepidoglyphus destructor, and three to Tyrophagus putrescentiae. Acarus siro was not responsible for any of the positive reactions. The results indicate that, among dairy farmers, storage mites are as common as cow dander as a cause of allergic occupational rhinitis.

Allergens↗
PubMed1980

Dog dander allergens. Specificity studies based on the radioallergosorbent technique.

Cat allergen-specific serum IgE antibodies were detected in 27 (71%) of a group of 38 dog dander-sensitive patients. In 4 (44%) of the cases the dual reaction could be explained by the presence of IgE antibodies to cross-reacting serum proteins. In a larger group the binding of dog dander-specific IgE antibodies could be inhibited by cat epithelium allergens. Two allergenic components of dog dander were separated by chromatography on Sephadex G-75. One of the allergens was closely related to a purified major cat epithelium allergen. The other allergen was apparently dog-specific and showed no cross-reactivity with cat allergens. Both components were present in the dander of dachshund, Airedale terrier, poodle and boxer. The dog dander is the preferable source of dog epithelium allergens provided that the existence of relations to other animals is considered.

Allergens↗
PubMed1997

Immediate and delayed skin allergy from cow dander.

BACKGROUND: Cow dander is the most common cause of occupational contact urticaria in Finland. Occasionally cow dander also causes allergic contact dermatitis, which can be revealed by patch testing with cow dander. OBJECTIVE: A patient with a combined type I and type IV allergy to cow dander is the subject of this report. RESULTS: She had intense pruritus, whealing, and severe dermatitis, but no respiratory symptoms. Skin tests and radioallergosorbent test indicated that she had both type I and type IV allergy to cow dander. CONCLUSION: Increasing numbers of cases with both type I and type IV allergy are reported, but the mechanism is not clear. In our clinic, we classify immediate reactions as contact urticaria if the clinical picture involves whealing, and as protein contact dermatitis if dermatitis dominates the clinical picture. If delayed allergic patch test results are obtained, we consider it allergic contact dermatitis.

Allergens↗
PubMed1996

Complementary DNA cloning of the predominant allergen of bovine dander: a new member in the lipocalin family.

BACKGROUND: A number of allergenic proteins in animal danders have been characterized at the molecular level, but little is known of their biologic functions. We have found that the prevalence of IgE antibodies among patients with cattle-associated asthma is highest against a dander protein referred to as BDA20. OBJECTIVE: The study was performed to characterize the molecular structure of BDA20,* the predominant allergen in bovine dander. METHODS: Clones encoding allergens were identified and isolated from a complementary DNA library by immunoblotting and DNA hybridization and sequenced. Recombinant proteins were produced in Escherichia coli. Immunoreactivity of the recombinant proteins and amino acid sequences of peptides obtained from native BDA20 after Lys-C cleavage were used to identify clones coding for BDA20. RESULTS: In this article we report the cDNA and amino acid sequences of BDA20. Homology comparisons showed that BDA20 belongs to the family of lipocalins. CONCLUSIONS: The results link a dander allergen to a group of functionally important proteins. Lipocalins are present in various body fluids and secretions of several animal species in which they function as carriers of small hydrophobic molecules, such as retinoids and pheromones. If allergenicity proves to be a property shared by lipocalins, our results will have considerable implications for allergen research.

Allergens↗
PubMed2003

Animal danders.

Animals release proteins into their surroundings through secretions, as excretions, or as dander. The quantity of dander that is dispersed by cats, dogs, or humans is sufficient to supply food for dust mites and to supply easily measurable quantities of proteins in dust. Fel d 1, Can f 1, and human IgA or IgG can be found in microgram quantities in dust samples. Allergens also can accumulate from the urine of wild or pet rodents. For cats and dogs, the accumulation of dander particles is not related to the cleanliness of the animals. All animals, including humans, provide a fully adequate supply of organic material for bacterial growth in a carpet, provided conditions are sufficiently humid. The authors' preliminary results in Virginia do not find a significant difference in endotoxin between homes with or without animals. The likely explanation for the nonallergic IgG and IgG4 response to cat, dog, or rat allergens is high exposure to proteins from these animals. If the highest levels of cat allergen in a home can result in immunologic tolerance, it is unlikely that primary avoidance would be successful at reducing exposure. The data showing that 80% of Swedish children with cat allergies never had lived with a cat imply that the concentrations of cat allergen in schools or in houses without a cat are sufficient to cause sensitization. Primary prevention would be possible only on a community basis, which is unlikely to occur. Sensitization to cat, rat, dog, or mouse allergens consistently is associated with asthma. In symptomatic children with positive skin test results, there is a strong case for allergen avoidance and a clear need for controlled trials. Controlled trials of avoidance should include houses without cats and schools. Controlling exposure to cat allergens with the cat in situ requires aggressive measures, such as removing reservoirs, washing the cat, and air cleaning. Many allergic or symptomatic children who live with a cat do not have positive skin test results or positive IgE antibodies to cats. Avoidance measures related to animals should be recommended only for individuals with positive skin test results. Increasing evidence shows that exposure to cats, dogs, rats, and other animals can induce a form of immunologic tolerance without causing allergic disease, and it is important to understand why this change occurs with dander allergens rather than with all allergens. The most probable explanations are related to the form and quantity of airborne allergens.

Air Pollution, Indoor↗