SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Defecography”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1999

[Defecography by spiral computed tomography].

PURPOSE: We investigated the possible role of helical CT defecography in pelvic floor disorders by comparing our results with those of conventional defecography. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our series consisted of 90 patients, namely 62 women and 28 men, ranging in age 24-82 years. They were all submitted to conventional defecography, and 18 questionable cases were also studied with helical CT defecography. The conventional examination was performed during the 4 standard phases of resting, squeezing, Valsalva and straining; we used a remote-control unit. The parameters for helical CT defecography were: 5 mm beam collimation, pitch 2, 120 KV, 250 mAs and 18-20 degrees gantry inclination to acquire coronal images of the pelvic floor. The rectal ampulla was distended with a bolus of 300 mL nonionic iodinated contrast agent (dilution: 3 g/cc). The patient wore a napkin and was seated on the table, except for those who could not hold the position and were thus examined supine. Twenty-second helical scans were performed at rest and during evacuation; multiplanar reconstructions were obtained especially on the sagittal plane for comparison with conventional defecographic images. RESULTS: An unquestionable diagnosis could be made in all the 18 patients submitted to helical CT defecography. The diagnosis was in agreement with proctology results and added new information in all cases. Sixteen patients had constipation and 2 fecal incontinence--one from rectal prolapse and the other from a rectovaginal fistula. In this latter case helical CT defecography permitted to confirm the fistula and suggest its course. One patient had a previously undetected ovarian cancer metastatic to the anterior rectal wall. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Coronal helical CT defecography images permitted to map the perineal floor muscles, while sagittal reconstructions provided information on the ampulla and the levator ani. To conclude, helical CT defecography performed well in the study of pelvic floor disorders and can follow conventional defecography especially in questionable cases.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Anterior rectocele: assessment with radiographic defecography, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examination.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to devise a measuring method for an anterior rectocele on standardized defecographies and magnetic resonance images (MRI) to quantify anterior rectocele and to test whether this could substantiate clinical decision making for operative treatment for anterior rectocele. METHODS: Quantitative analysis by the measuring method as proposed was compared with qualitative scores on defecographies and MRI from the same patients. Thirty-eight patients with symptoms compatible with an anterior rectocele were subjected to physical examination in the left decubitis position and supine position and to defecography. Findings on defecography were compared with findings on physical examination. Thirteen patients were examined before and after surgical correction of the anterior rectocele for a total of 51 qualitative and quantitative examinations. The group of operated patients was analyzed for treatment results. Nineteen controls were included. RESULTS: Sixty-six radiographs of 33 defecographies were qualified in three grading classes and quantified with the proposed method by two observers. The mean measured value of the anterior rectocele in the three subjective grading classes is significantly different (P < 0.001). Anterior rectoceles qualified as severe had a measured value of 20 mm or more in 96 percent of the radiographs. Lower gradings were never > 20 mm. On MRI severe anterior rectoceles were not scored and measured values did not correlate with qualitative scores. When findings on physical examination were compared with defecographic measurement, the coefficient of correlation (r) between the radiologic assessment and clinical examination in the left decubitis position is r = 0.87, for the examination in the supine position, r = 0.77. All 15 cases scored as severe anterior rectocele in the left decubitis position had a measured anterior rectocele of > or = 20 mm. In the 13 cases that received surgery, there was a significant reduction of the anterior rectocele (P < 0.001) and clinical improvement. Patients with small or moderate anterior rectocele on physical examination with a size > or = 20 mm on defecography were cured by surgical correction. None of the controls had an anterior rectocele on physical examination or an anterior rectocele > or = 20 mm on defecography. CONCLUSIONS: An anterior rectocele with a size of 20 mm or more corresponds with a qualitative score of "severe" on radiographic defecography. Physical examination for anterior rectocele in the left decubitis position corresponds best with quantitative radiographic assessment and anterior rectocele with a size > or = 20 mm on defecography is pathologic. Patients with complaints compatible with anterior rectocele can be assessed in objective and quantitative terms by radiography and can be successfully surgically treated, even if at physical examination the anterior rectocele is not classified as large, provided that dynamic defecography shows an anterior rectocele of > or = 20 mm. The potential of dynamic MRI with regard to anterior rectoceles presently seems absent.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Dynamic anal endosonography may challenge defecography for assessing dynamic anorectal disorders: results of a prospective pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The diagnosis of anorectal dynamic disorders and perineal insufficiency has been mainly based up to now on the use of defecography. Here, we performed a prospective blinded study to evaluate the accuracy of a new procedure, dynamic anorectal endosonography (DAE), by comparing it with defecography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 43 women (mean age 53), presenting with outlet obstruction, were prospectively enrolled in our study. The DAE was performed with a 7.5-Mhz linear probe (Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) with basal and straining recordings. None of the DAE or defecography operators was informed about the results of the respective other investigation. RESULTS: Defecography showed a descending perineum in 29 patients (68%), a rectocele in 25 patients (58%), and a rectal intussusception in eight patients (18%). The rate of concordance between the diagnosis of descending urinary bladder at DAE and descending perineum at defecography was 35/43 (80%), and that between the descending puborectal muscle at DAE and descending perineum at defecography was 40/43 (93 %). The rates of concordance between DAE and defecography for the diagnosis of rectocele and rectal intussusception were 27/43 patients (57%) and 34/43 patients (80%), respectively. In the last 15 patients, the DAE technique was adapted in order to improve the accuracy for diagnosing rectocele by filling the rectum with water. This improved sensitivity from 36 to 86% and accuracy from 57 to 87%. CONCLUSIONS: DAE is a new imaging approach to anorectal dynamic disorders, providing a highly reliable means of diagnosing perineal insufficiency as well as rectocele. DAE should be substituted for previous methods since it makes it possible at the same time to assess the anal sphincters and to avoid pelvic irradiation.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Dynamic MR defecography with a superconducting, open-configuration MR system.

PURPOSE: To evaluate dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) defecography performed with a superconducting, open-configuration system in diagnosis of defecation disorders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five healthy volunteers and 15 patients with defecation disorders were studied with MR defecography performed with a superconducting, open-configuration system; the patients also underwent fluoroscopic defecography. Before MR imaging, the rectum was filled with 300 mL of mashed potatoes mixed with 1.5 mL of gadopentetate dimeglumine. T1-weighted gradient-echo images were acquired every 2 seconds in the midsagittal plane with the patient at rest, at maximal contraction of the anal sphincter, during straining, and during defecation. RESULTS: MR defecography permitted analysis of the anorectal angle, anal canal, puborectal muscle, and descent of the pelvic floor. Owing to the high signal intensity of the intraluminal contrast material, the rectal walls were well demonstrated on the MR images, permitting visualization of intussusception and rectocele. Concomitant demonstration of structures surrounding the anorectal canal was helpful in assessment of spastic pelvic floor syndrome and descending perineum syndrome. MR defecography was superior to fluoroscopic defecography and allowed detection of all clinically relevant pathologic conditions except for one. CONCLUSION: Dynamic MR defecography is an attractive alternative for evaluation of defecation disorders.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

[Importance of defecography in the evaluation of genital prolapses].

OBJECTIVE: To determine the interest of defecography for the initial evaluation of genital prolapses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 125 patients who had undergone systematically a defecography for the initial evaluation of a genital prolapse. RESULTS: 10% of defecogaphies were normal. On clinical examination a rectocele was found in 94% of patients and an enterocele in 33%. At defecography, these abnormalities were seen only in 39% and 15% respectively. 39% of patients with radiological rectocele had an intussusception at defecography. CONCLUSION: Defecography is appropriate to diagnose and to assess constitutional abnormalities associated with genital prolapse (rectocele, enterocele) and other anomalies which interact with it (intussusception, sphincter and pubo-rectal dyskinesia). Most of women with genital prolapse showed abnormal defecograms. We observed a marked discordance between clinical and radiological evaluation, specially for rectocele. Defecography is of great interest in the evaluation of posterior genital prolapses, specially in women complaining of dyschesia. Defecography may be proposed in case of: posterior vaginal wall prolapse (rectocele, enterocele), dyschesia, post-operative prolapse and before a cervicopexy.

Defecography↗

PubMed1995

Four-contrast defecography: pelvic "floor-oscopy".

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the accuracy of physical examination (as judged by four-contrast defecography) for women with pelvic floor relaxation disorders. METHODS: Sixty-two women (mean age, 59 years) who had obstructed defecation or constipation, vaginal prolapse, urinary difficulty, or pelvic pain underwent four-contrast defecography. Oral, vaginal, bladder, and rectal contrast were administered selectively and fluoroscopy was performed. Radiographic findings were compared with physical examination diagnosis. RESULTS: Four-contrast defecography changed the diagnosis in 46 patients (75 percent); 26 percent of presumed cystoceles, 36 percent of enteroceles, and 25 percent of rectoceles were not present on defecography. Defecography also revealed unsuspected coexisting defects in addition to known abnormalities detected on physical examination. In contrast, when physical examination was negative for these defects, 63 percent of patients were found to have cystoceles, 46 percent to have enteroceles, and 73 percent to have rectoceles on four-contrast defecography. The discovery of Grade 2 or 3 unsuspected abnormalities was significant, especially so for enteroceles. For posterior vaginal eversions extending to or past the introitus, physical examination was accurate in only 61 percent. Physical examination of large anterior defects was more accurate, with 74 percent of patients being correctly diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: Physical examination diagnosis of pelvic floor relaxation disorders is frequently inaccurate, especially for large vaginal eversions. Four-contrast defecography improves diagnostic accuracy, helps to identify all pelvic floor defects before surgery, and can assist with planning the correct operative approach.

Defecation↗

PubMed1995

Simultaneous defecography and peritoneography in defecation disorders.

UNLABELLED: A number of physiologic and radiologic investigations are used in investigating defecation disorders. Defecography is one important part of these investigations. However, a correct diagnosis of an enterocele is sometimes difficult despite use of contrast media in the rectum, vagina, and small bowel. PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to ascertain if it was technically possible to perform simultaneous defecography and peritoneography in an effort to improve the diagnostic possibilities in patients with defecation disorders. METHODS: Twelve patients with defecation disorders and an unexplained widening of the rectovaginal space at defecography were investigated. Contrast medium was introduced intraperitoneally, after which conventional defecography was performed. RESULTS: All investigations were carried out without complications and demonstrated the peritoneal outline in all patients. Simultaneous defecography and peritoneography differentiated between an enterocele and a pathologically deep pouch of Douglas--a peritoneocele. Three types of peritoneocele were visualized: vaginal peritoneocele, septal peritoneocele, and rectal peritoneocele with or without enterocele. Combinations of the three types were also found. Eight of the 12 patients had rectal intussusception or rectal prolapse. All of these eight patients had a rectal peritoneocele. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous defecography and peritoneography can be performed without technical difficulties or complications. Peritoneal outlines and pouches can, therefore, be studied directly during the act of defecation. An unexplained widening of the rectovaginal space at defecography can be clarified as a peritoneocele, with or without an enterocele. Peritoneocele can be of three different types: rectal, septal, or vaginal.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Defecography in symptomatic older women living at home.

BACKGROUND: complaints of defecation disorders in older patients living at home is an emerging problem. Little is known about radiological examination of this population. OBJECTIVE: this study aimed to analyse the yield of defecography in women older than 75 years, living at home and complaining of defecation disorders. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: prospective study of patients referred to a radiology department in a tertiary-care medical centre in Rouen, France. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 52 women (mean age: 78, range: 75-93) complaining of constipation, faecal incontinence or pelvic pain underwent defecography. Defecography was performed after intake of a barium meal and vaginal opacification. Radiographs were analysed accordingly with the established criteria. RESULTS: defecography showed perineal descent in 27 patients, rectocele in 29, intussusception in 33 and enterocele in 14. A combination of abnormalities was found in 40 women. Only 3 studies were normal. There was no significant association between symptoms and pelvic disorders revealed by defecography. CONCLUSIONS: defecography in symptomatic women aged 75 years and over did not raise any technical difficulty. It revealed a 77% rate of abnormalities, but there was no relationship between the symptoms and the detected abnormalities.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Defecography: results in 55 patients and impact on clinical management.

We reviewed the medical records and defecograms in 55 consecutive patients to determine the impact of results of defecography on clinical management. Main indication for defecography was constipation, present in 40 (73%) of 55 patients. In the remaining 15 patients, indications included obstructed defecation (5), incontinence (5), and miscellaneous symptoms (5). Defecography evaluated pelvic floor motion by assessing changes in the anorectal angle (ARA) and anorectal junction (ARJ) during various maneuvers, extent of evacuation, and structural abnormalities. Patients were grouped based on results of defecography as being normal (26) or abnormal (29). Comparison of measurements of the ARA and ARJ with various maneuvers showed no significant differences between the two groups. Clinical impact was determined by analyzing therapy done following defecography and subsequent patient response. In the normal group, 15 patients were managed medically, seven surgically, and four lost to follow-up. Clinical improvement occurred in 13 (59%) of 22 patients, with similar results between medical (60%) and surgical (57%) therapy. In the abnormal group, 16 had medical management, seven surgical therapy, and six lost to follow-up. Clinical improvement occurred in 13 (57%) of 23 patients but surgical therapy showed more improvement. In conclusion, most standard measurements of the ARA and ARJ were of no value in determining abnormality. Results of defecography did not alter selection of medical or surgical therapy, and had little impact on patient response to therapy.

Anal Canal↗

PubMed2000

[Radiologic investigation of external rectal prolapse. Assessment in 48 patients with defecography, seven of them also with dynamic CT of the pelvis].

PURPOSE: To report our personal experience in 48 patients with external rectal prolapse examined with defecography, evaluating radiological signs and the indications for surgical treatment. We also report the results of 7 patients with severe prolapse submitted to dynamic CT of pelvis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The findings relative to 48 patients suffering from external prolapse, 27 women and 21 men, (mean age 58 years), were retrospectively reviewed. In our study protocol the patient is made to sit on a defecographic commode with the pelvis in lateral projection and radiographic images are acquired at rest, on contraction and on evacuation. Dynamic CT of pelvis with axial and coronal scans of the pelvic floor was carried out in 7 patients with severe prolapses. Twenty-six of 48 patients underwent rectopexy. RESULTS: The main symptoms were anorectal and perineal weight sensation (93%), perineal disturbance in the sitting position (91%) and anorectal pain extended to sacral area (83%). Manometry, which was performed in 36 cases, showed a rectoanal inhibitory reflex evokable at high volumes of air, especially in incontinent subjects. Defecography demonstrated external rectal prolapse in all cases; rectal intussusception in 32, mucosal prolapse in 30, abnormal widening of the anorectal angle in 24 (16 of them were incontinent), rectocele in 22 and perineal descent syndrome in 16 cases. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: External rectal prolapse is sometimes a dynamic progression of a rectal intussusception. In anorectal intussusceptions, the invaginatum involves the anal canal, thus causing the external prolapse. Defecography clearly shows the continuation of invagination out of the anus, with the formation of prolapse. Dynamic CT proved accurate in detecting the rectum morphology, but added no further information to defecography, except for the diastasis of anosphincterial muscles. Therefore, we conclude that defecography is the method of choice, though complementary to other instrumental techniques such as manometry, electromyography and endoscopy, in the diagnostic workup of these patients. Moreover, it can recognize other alterations, such as incontinence and rectocele, which can be submitted to surgical correction with rectopexy.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Role of defecography in predicting clinical outcome of rectocele repair.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of defecography in predicting clinical outcome of rectocele repair. METHODS: Between January 1988 and July 1994, 74 consecutive patients (median age, 54 (range, 35-81) years) with a rectocele and symptoms of obstructed defecation were studied prospectively. After preoperative evaluation by a standardized questionnaire, physical examination, and defecography, a combined transvaginal/transanal rectocele repair was performed. At follow-up, all patients had defecography. Long-term results were qualified by an independent observer after a median follow-up of 58 (range, 14-89) months as "excellent," "good," or "poor." RESULTS: Rectocele repair was considered excellent in 37 patients and good in 13 patients. Defecography six months after surgery did not show persistent or recurrent rectocele in any of the patients. Size of the rectocele, barium-trapping in the rectocele, internal intussusception, rectal evacuation, and perineal descent did not appear to influence clinical outcome. Radiologic evidence of anismus did not correlate with long-term results of rectocele repair. CONCLUSIONS: Combined transanal/transvaginal repair of rectocele is an efficient therapy in patients with obstructed defecation. Various defecographic parameters (size of rectocele, internal intussusception, rectal evacuation, perineal descent, radiologic signs of anismus) do not appear to influence clinical outcome of surgery. The main value of defecography is the objective demonstration of rectocele and any associated abnormalities such as an enterocele preoperatively and again in objective assessment of the postoperative results.

Defecation↗

PubMed2001

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography: a diagnostic alternative in the assessment of pelvic floor disorders in proctology.

PURPOSE: Standard diagnostic proctologic procedures in the assessment of pelvic floor disorders include clinical evaluation and endoscopy. Particular aspects of combined pelvic floor disorders, especially those involving more than one pelvic compartment, may remain undetected without additional technical diagnostic procedures such as videoproctoscopy, cinedefecography, or colpocystodefecography. The aim of the study was to review the potentials of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography to elucidate the underlying anatomic and pathophysiologic background of pelvic floor disorders in proctologic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography was performed in 20 Patients (13 females) with main diagnoses such as rectal prolapse or intussusception, rectocele, descending perineum, fecal incontinence, outlet obstruction, and dyskinetic puborectalis muscle after clinical evaluation. The investigation was performed on a 1.5 T-magnetic resonance imaging machine in supine position. The rectum was filled with Gd-DTPA enriched ultrasound gel. First a T1/T2 weighted investigation of the pelvis was performed, followed by defecography with evacuation of the rectum. Images were obtained in a sagittal plane in a frequency of 1 image/second (true FISP) at rest and during straining. The obtained magnetic resonance imaging video tapes were analyzed off-line with cinematographic evaluation of bladder base, uterus, and anal canal position in relation to the pubococcygeal line by a blinded radiologist. Investigation time was 20 minutes. RESULTS: In dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography of the pelvic floor, 12 patients with descending perineum, 10 rectoceles (10 females), 6 cystoceles (6 females), 4 enteroceles (4 females), 8 intussusceptions (5 females), and a dyskinetic puborectalis muscle in 3 males were detected. In 11 females and 3 males multifocal disorders were found, involving more than one compartment in females, whereas in males complex defects were restricted to the posterior compartment. Magnetic resonance imaging defecography revealed diagnoses consistent with clinical results in 77.3 percent and defects in addition to clinical diagnoses in combined pelvic floor disorders in 34 percent. CONCLUSIONS: In complex pelvic floor disorders, involving more than a single defect, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging represents a convenient diagnostic procedure in females and to a lesser extent in males, in particular in terms of dynamic imaging of pelvic floor organs during defecation. In addition to the clinical assessment, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging had clinical impact in proctologic and interdisciplinary treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Combined anorectal manometry and defecography in 50 consecutive adults with fecal incontinence.

Fifty consecutive patients presenting with fecal incontinence were evaluated prospectively with anorectal manometry, defecography, and other tests of anorectal function to assess the clinical utility of defecography in fecal incontinence. Leakage of contrast at rest and failure to narrow the anorectal angle with pelvic squeezing were specific but not sensitive predictors of decreased sphincter pressures as determined by manometry. Thus, after manometry, defecography provided no additional information regarding sphincter strength. Retention of contrast in large rectoceles or incomplete rectal evacuation at defecography had excellent correlation with the presence of clinical symptoms of outlet obstruction constipation (present concurrently with incontinence) and indicated an etiology of outlet obstruction symptoms. Defecography may provide useful information in incontinent patients with outlet obstruction constipation symptoms but has little additive value to anorectal manometry in incontinent patients without such symptoms.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Are interpretations of video defecographies reliable and reproducible?

Video defecography is a dynamic investigation which can influence surgical decision making in constipated patients. A study was therefore undertaken to assess the inter and intraobserver variability in video defecography. Specifically, we sought to assess the interpretation of video defecographies by a group of observers with the same training, guidelines and standards. To determine interobserver variation, four independent observers, two blinded to the patient's history, reviewed 100 randomly sequenced video defecographies performed in constipated patients. The presence or absence of sigmoidocele, rectocele, intussusception or prolapse was noted. Adequate or improper function of the puborectalis, anal canal opening, anorectal angle (ARA) and grade of emptying of the rectum were also assessed. Two weeks after the initial assessment, intraobserver variation was determined by a repeat blinded review of unlabelled randomly sequenced studies. The results of interobserver accuracy for sigmoidoceles, rectoceles, intussusception, rectal prolapse, rectal emptying, opening of the anal canal, puborectalis contraction and straightening of the ARA and rectal emptying were 89.5%, 46.0%, 87.5%, 97.5%, 86.5%, 88.5%, 83.0%, and 80.0%, respectively. The intraobserver variations were 88.5%, 83.8%, 80.5%, 94.5%, 77.0%, 84.8%, 80.5% and 85.5%, respectively. Prior knowledge of the patient's history did not significantly influence the outcome. In summery, video defecography has an overall accuracy of 83.3% and as such is a valid tool in assessing constipated patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Peritoneocele: visualization with defecography and peritoneography performed simultaneously.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of simultaneous defecography and peritoneography (defecoperitoneography) in patients with an unexplained widening of the rectovaginal space noted at defecography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with unexplained widening of the rectovaginal space noted at defecography were studied with defecoperitoneography. Defecoperitoneography was a combination of defecography and peritoneography with water-soluble contrast medium administered intraperitoneally. RESULTS: The outline and movements of the peritoneum and alterations in the pelvic peritoneal cavity could be visualized with defecoperitoneography during the dynamic act of defecation. Unexplained widening of the rectovaginal space was completely due to a peritoneocele in 14 patients and partially due to a peritoneocele in six patients. In two patients, there was no peritoneocele. Only nine of 22 patients had bowel in the unexplained widening (enterocele). Three patients had a rectal peritoneocele; six, a septal peritoneocele; one, a vaginal peritoneocele; and 10, a combination of these findings. CONCLUSION: Visualization of the pelvic floor with defecoperitoneography is improved compared with visualization with defecography alone.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

[A study of the defecography].

Defecography, the radiologic examination of the defecation function, has never been reported in Japan, whereas some reports have been published in western countries. However neither the methods nor the criteria for use have been fully established. The author carried out a radiologic study focusing on the maximum lower rectal width and the ano-rectal angle by means of defecography which is considered one of the most efficient methods to examine the morphology and function of defecation. Defecography was carried out in order to study the changes in maximum lower rectal the width and the ano-rectal angle during straining and at rest both with and without the spasmolytic agent, Buscopan. The effects of using different amount of barium sulfate suspension 120 ml and 50 ml were also studied. The maximum rectal width tended to be narrowed and the ano rectal angle to increase during straining as compared to the measurements at rest, while no significant changes, were observed concerning the presence or absence of Buscopan. In comparative studies between pathologic cases such as those with constipation incontinence hemorrhoids and post operative hemorrhoids, and a normal control group, a statistically significant difference was demonstrated only in the cases with hemorrhoids. No difference was demonstrated in any of the cases in association with the use of Buscopan. The length of the anal canal was shortened by straining and was longer in males than in females. Furthermore, by using a catheter with optic fiber, the internal pressure of the anal canal was measured before defecography and it was noted that pressure was lower in older patient and patients with constipation. In conclusion, defecography is one of the most important radiologic examination procedures related to the physio-pathology of defecation.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

[Defecography in rectal wall prolapse conditions].

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic floor and rectal prolapse conditions have greatly benefitted by new imaging and instrumental diagnostic approaches, and especially defecography, for both pathophysiological interpretation and differential diagnosis. We investigated the efficacy of defecography in the assessment of rectal prolapse, and in particular the role of videoproctography in diagnosing such dynamic disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We selected 224 patients with rectal prolapse from a series of 1,190 consecutive subjects with evacuation disturbances examined in the last 5 years with defecography combined with videoproctography. The patients were 176 women and 48 men ranging in age 32-79 years (mean: 48). Defecography was carried out with Mahieu's technique, but we changed the filter position slightly. Sixty-seven per cent of our patients had been submitted to sigmoidoscopy, but this examination does not usually show rectal intussusception. Occult blood test in feces and double contrast barium enema were carried out in 42% and 38% of cases, respectively, to exclude any organic conditions of colon. RESULTS: Mucosal prolapse was more frequent than intussusception (71% and 34%, respectively); rectal walls went out through the anus in 12 cases of anorectal intussusception and thus caused external rectal prolapse. Rectal prolapse was associated with other anorectal alterations, such as rectocele, perineal descent and puborectalis muscle syndrome, in 96 cases. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The dynamic changes of ampulla are well depicted by videoproctography, which showed anorectum normalization and spontaneous reduction of invagination after intussusception. Defecography exhibited good capabilities in showing rectal wall function abnormalities. Finally, some features of videoproctography such as low radiation dose, noninvasiveness and ease of execution, make the examination acceptable to patients with anorectal disorders and for the follow-up of rectal prolapse.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

[The value of defecography for diagnosis of rectocele and rectal prolapse].

The role of defecography with respect to rectoceles and to any grade of rectal prolapses has not been defined so far. Therefore, we studied 42 out of 45 patients that were submitted to a defecography between 1988 and 1992 for defecation disorders of unknown origin. In particular, we compared the diagnosis obtained by anamnestic data and the physical examination with the defecographic results and the definitive diagnosis with regard to the chosen therapies and the results. Rectocele and rectal prolapse were very frequent pathologies with 69% and 33% respectively. Of 23 patients with a clinically palpable rectocele, defecography was false negative in 4 and moreover, it did not provide any information about the functional relevance of the rectocele. Yet, it disproved the clinically diagnosed prolapses in 6 of 15 subjects, but revealed one in 5 of 27 patients that were presumed normal. On the other hand, a previously not diagnosed rectocele was detected in 6 out of 19 patients by means of defecography, but none of them proved to be of any clinical relevance. Of all rectoceles, only 48% were regarded responsible for the patients' symptoms and were therefore operated. Hereby, the indication for a surgical approach based more on anamnestic data and the proctological examination than on radiographic findings. Contrarily, the indication for a rectopexy--even if given only in 4 of those 14 patients with any grade of invagination--mainly based on the dynamics during defecation as documented by defecography.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗