SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Disease modifying”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1992

Clinical research in osteoarthritis: design and results of short-term and long-term trials with disease-modifying drugs.

Putative disease-modifying drugs are usually clinically used in osteoarthritis with two main aims: not only stopping or reducing the cartilage degenerative process after a long-term treatment, but also controlling the symptoms of the disease within a few days or weeks, thus avoiding or diminishing the use of symptomatic medications. Due to the difficulties of implementing the first aim, the latter aim was more often investigated, even if most often with inadequate study design and insufficient numbers of patients. We have recently carried out three double-blind, controlled, parallel groups, randomized, 4-6 week trials of glucosamine sulphate versus placebo or the NSAID ibuprofen on a total of 606 gonarthrosic out-patients. Movement limitation and pain were scored according to the Lequesne index, and the efficacy goals were strictly pre-determined. Access to other medications was not allowed. Glucosamine was significantly more effective than placebo, while no difference was detected in comparison with the NSAID (p < 0.025 and p = 0.77, respectively: Fisher's two-tailed exact test). On the other hand, glucosamine was as well tolerated as placebo, while the percentage of patients suffering adverse drug reactions was higher in the ibuprofen group (37% vs 7%: p < 0.001). Long-term trials are in progress and several aspects are to be considered in their design: they must be double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, continued for a period of years and (most importantly) with the careful use of imaging and biochemical techniques capable of generating objective evaluation criteria.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2026

Large-scale AI analysis reveals missed opportunities in albuminuria testing and disease-modifying therapy implementation.

AIMS: Albuminuria is a key diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of chronic kidney disease (CKD), associated with adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Despite guideline recommendations, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) testing is infrequently performed in cardiology. This study assessed the uptake of UACR testing, the estimated prevalence of undiagnosed albuminuria, and the use of disease-modifying therapies in patients with cardio-kidney-metabolic (CKM) disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adults seen at the cardiology department of a tertiary referral centre between 2019 and 2024. Data were extracted using CTcue, an AI-driven platform. Albuminuria was defined as UACR ≥30 mg/g. A weighted logistic regression model estimated albuminuria prevalence in untested patients. Among 77 351 patients (44.8% female, mean age 64.4 years), only 8.9% had a recorded UACR, of whom 46.4% had albuminuria. Testing rates were low across high-risk groups: 29.9% in diabetes, 21.7% in heart failure, and 13.7% in hypertension. In untested patients, the predicted prevalence of albuminuria was 36.6%, and highest in those with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 (70.0%), heart failure (47.8%), or diabetes (46.8%). Use of disease-modifying therapies was low, even among patients with confirmed albuminuria. In patients with documented vs. predicted albuminuria, 43.0% vs. 39.1% received renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, 12.8% vs. 5.7% received SGLT2 inhibitors, and <1% in both groups received finerenone. CONCLUSION: Albuminuria is substantially underdetected in cardiology practice, possibly contributing to underuse of effective CKM therapies. Systematic UACR screening with structured treatment protocols may help close this gap and improve outcomes for patients with CKM disease.

Humans↗

PubMed1992

Double blind, placebo controlled study of metronidazole as a disease modifying agent in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Anecdotal reports suggest that metronidazole may have disease modifying activity in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. To assess possible beneficial effects a double blind, comparative trial of metronidazole and placebo was performed. Fifty patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were randomly allocated to receive active drug (n = 24) or placebo (n = 26) and reviewed at weeks 0, 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24. Detailed assessment of drug safety, biochemical and haematological parameters, and efficacy was made at these dates. Dose regimen was 400 mg twice daily from weeks 0 to eight, increasing to 400 mg three times a day from weeks nine to 24 provided that no adverse effects were recorded. Most patients were unable to tolerate metronidazole because of side effects or lack of efficacy, with only five (21%) continuing to take the drug at 24 weeks. For those patients attaining 12 weeks of treatment an overall improvement in articular index and morning stiffness was found. No improvement in laboratory indices of disease activity was seen, however. In this study metronidazole did not have disease modifying properties and was unacceptably toxic.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: gold, penicillamine, antimalarials, and sulfasalazine.

In the assessment of the effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, three or four clinical measurements supported by the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and sometimes radiographs, are generally agreed to be correct. Some advocate functional assessments also, or even alternatively. Several studies compared gold, penicillamine, antimalarials, and sulfasalazine either with each other or with placebo, and occasionally with methotrexate. No important differences between the general performance of the four drugs were found. More work was reported on sulfasalazine than on the other three drugs; the data support that it has a place in our armamentarium. Several important contributions concerned strategies of treatment. It is considered that disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs should be used earlier and more aggressively in rheumatoid arthritis. This aspect was perhaps the key note of the 1990 literature on this topic. As part of the new strategies, combination therapy is urged by some rheumatologists, whereas others urge caution on the grounds that we do not yet know enough about the effects of combinations, or by how much the risks of adverse effects are increased in combination.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed1990

Double blind placebo controlled trial of pulse treatment with methylprednisolone combined with disease modifying drugs in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether monthly treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone enhances or accelerates the effect of disease modifying drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: A 12 month double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre trial in which patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were randomly allocated to receive pulses of either methylprednisolone or saline every four weeks for six months. At the start of the pulse treatment all patients were started on penicillamine or azathioprine. SETTING: Four rheumatology departments in Denmark. PATIENTS: 97 Patients (71 women, 26 men) aged 23-84 (mean 60) who had active rheumatoid arthritis of at least four weeks' duration despite treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Monthly clinical recording of morning stiffness, number of tender and swollen joints, blinded observers' evaluation of therapeutic effect, and patients' self assessed condition. Concomitant laboratory measurements of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and concentrations of C reactive protein and haemoglobin. Radiography to determine the number of erosions at the start of treatment and after 12 months. RESULTS: 57 Patients completed the trial, taking the same disease modifying drug throughout. Evaluation four weeks after each pulse treatment and at 12 month follow up showed no significant differences between the methylprednisolone and placebo groups in any of the clinical or laboratory variables. Radiography showed the same degree of progression of erosions in both groups. Evaluation of the total data on 97 patients and on the 57 who completed the trial showed the same lack of significance between the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous pulse treatment with steroids can be recommended only for rapid temporary relief of flares of disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The response is short lived. Repeated pulses of methylprednisolone at four week intervals do not improve the results of treatment with drugs that induce remission such as penicillamine and azathioprine.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Disease-modifying agents and experimental treatments of rheumatoid arthritis.

The pharmacologic management of the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient involves the use of various classes of therapeutic agents to induce symptomatic relief and reduce disease activity. Aspirin and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are used initially to lessen the degree of pain and swelling associated with the inflammatory disease process. The addition of a heterogeneous class of compounds, "second-line" therapy (previously known as disease-modifying antiinflammatory rheumatic drugs), is advocated to modify the disease course itself. Second-line treatments include antimalarials, gold salts, D-penicillamine, azathioprine, and methotrexate. Randomized placebo-controlled trials ahve demonstrated the efficacy of these compounds in RA. Improvement in standard parameters of disease activity including the number of painful and swollen joints, duration of morning stiffness, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate has been noted with these second-line drugs. Whether they modify roentgenographic progression is under rigorous study. These agents alone or in combination rarely induce complete disease remission. Therefore, newer therapies are under intensive investigation and include sulfasalazine, cyclosporin A, and combination therapy.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Treatment with immunosuppressive and disease modifying drugs during pregnancy and lactation.

Active rheumatic disease may necessitate the treatment of pregnant and lactating patients with disease modifying (DMARD) or immunosuppressive drugs. This review summarizes data from the literature, and attempts to give some recommendations. Possible teratogenic effects of gold, penicillamine, and chloroquine are still disputed. As long as the issue is not settled, it seems prudent to stop using these agents as soon as pregnancy is diagnosed. Hydroxychloroquine has been used by some rheumatologists for treating pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) without malformations detected in the neonates. Sulphasalazine does not increase the rate of congenital abnormalities. Selected case reports have not shown any teratogenicity of cyclosporine A so far. However, the drug may cause fetal retardation. The use of standard doses of azathioprine does not increase the risk of congenital anomalies. By contrast, the antitumor agents cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, and methotrexate are possibly teratogenic when given during early pregnancy, but may be less harmful in late pregnancy. Data on the excretion of DMARD and the cytostatic drugs are sparse. Because of insufficient data, breast feeding is not recommended in patients on antimalarials, penicillamine, cyclosporine A, and cytostatic drugs. Intramuscular gold and sulphasalazine seem to impose no major risk on the nursing infant.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗

PubMed2026

Characteristics of early-onset, rapidly progressive scoliosis in spinal muscular atrophy type I treated with disease-modifying therapy -a multicenter retrospective study conducted in Japan.

In the era of disease-modifying therapy (DMT), almost all patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type I treated after onset, but before 6 months of age, develop early-onset, rapidly progressive scoliosis by 2 years of age, despite improvements in their motor function. Seven symptomatic patients with SMA type I who were treated before the age of 6 months were included in this retrospective observational study. Scoliosis had developed in all patients by 27 months of age. Among them, the patients who could stand with support or independently (standing patients; n = 3) tended to present with more progressive scoliosis than the sitters (n = 4). All standing patients demonstrated thoracic hyperkyphosis before or at the time of their scoliosis diagnosis. Despite receiving DMT, these patients continued to show residual key manifestations of SMA type I. Chronic difficulty maintaining posture due to trunk muscle weakness in the lying, sitting, or standing position was considered to be the main contributor to the development and progression of the scoliosis. The development and progression of such scoliosis, which begins in infancy, may be related to inappropriate postural management, which is not currently recognized as such by clinicians, caregivers, or guardians. In this population, it is important to closely monitor patients for such scoliosis from soon after the diagnosis of SMA. As this type of scoliosis progresses rapidly during the early developmental stage, when surgery is not possible, it is necessary to establish a proactive non-surgical management strategy for it.

Humans↗

PubMed1990

Analysis of improvement in individual rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, based on the findings in patients treated with placebo. The Cooperative Systematic Studies of Rheumatic Diseases Group.

A composite index for estimating improvement in individual rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients during trials of slow-acting, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) was developed by analyzing the responses of 130 placebo-treated participants in Cooperative Systematic Studies of Rheumatic Diseases studies. If responses in 4 of 6 selected measures were required for improvement (by greater than or equal to 20% for morning stiffness, Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate, joint pain/tenderness score, and joint swelling score, and by greater than or equal to 2 grades on a 5-grade scale, or from grade 2 to grade 1 for patient's and physician's overall assessments of current disease severity), few placebo-treated patients qualified as improved, whereas significantly more DMARD-treated patients demonstrated improvement. The proposed index appears to be useful in estimating the probability that an RA patient will improve if taking a placebo during a DMARD trial, and may be a useful tool for analysis of DMARD studies.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗

PubMed1990

Rational use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

The currently available, most frequently used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) include auranofin, azathioprine, D-penicillamine, gold sodium thiomalate, hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate (amethopterin) and sulphasalazine. Controlled trials of these agents are reviewed to compare their relative efficacy and tolerability. Tender joint counts decreased with all drugs, as did joint swelling (measured as the percentage of patients with greater than or equal to 50% improvement in joint swelling). Tender joint count decreased by 8 to 57% in drug-treated patients, compared with 3 to 30% (1 study exceeded this degree of placebo response) in the placebo groups. The ratio of drug to placebo improvement usually averaged greater than 2. A 50% improvement in joint swelling occurred in between 15 and 65% of drug-treated patients. Time to onset of response varied from 6 weeks (with methotrexate) to as long as 18 months (some patients on hydroxychloroquine). The remission rate was inconsistent and unusual in controlled studies (5 to 7%), but very high in some open studies (e.g. 43%). While up to 8% of patients on DMARDs stopped therapy secondary to unsatisfactory therapeutic response (with 1 exception) up to 43% of placebo patients discontinued therapy for this reason. The ratio of dropouts for unsatisfactory therapeutic response for DMARD compared to placebo was less than 1 in 16 of 22 studies, and it was usually less than 0.5. Laboratory data examined include ESR, rheumatoid factor (RF), immunoglobulins and radiographic data. Ratios of decreases in ESR, comparing drug and placebo, were usually greater than 2. ESRs decreased from 3.6 to 27 mm/h, with gold sodium thiomalate, auranofin and methotrexate being most effective relative to placebo. RF decreased by greater than or equal to 2 tube dilutions in 15 to 53% of the DMARD groups but also decreased in up to 26% of placebo patients, with ratios of drug: placebo usually greater than 2. Immunoglobulins tended to decrease with DMARDs but the data are fragmentary. Radiographic evidence that a drug slows the rate of bony damage is strong evidence that it is a DMARD. These data, however, are not easily available because measurements of bony damage is insensitive and difficult. The best evidence of radiographic efficacy exists for gold, although the data are not uniform even here. Studies with other DMARDs suffer from lack of convincing control populations, methodological failures or small numbers, although trends exist showing that azathioprine and D-penicillamine (and perhaps sulphasalazine and methotrexate) may also slow bony deterioration. The other side of efficacy, of course, is tolerability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗

PubMed1992

Mechanisms of action of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs.

The relationship between the biologic activities of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and their therapeutic effects are complex. Some DMARD are prodrugs, e.g., azathioprine; others may act in combination with endogenous substances, e.g., D-penicillamine and copper salts. Gold compounds, antimalarials, sulfasalazine, azathioprine and methotrexate affect various phagocytic cell functions. Most DMARD inhibit the immune responses of monocytes and of T and B lymphocytes. Gold, sulfasalazine, D-penicillamine also affect fibroblast and/or endothelial cell proliferation. Many DMARD inhibit responses to, or production of, cytokines. Several DMARD have overlapping biologic effects but differ in their therapeutic efficacy in individual patients for unknown reasons.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Regulation of in vitro anti-DNA antibody production by a novel disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug, Lobenzarit.

Lobenzarit (CCA) is a novel disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug. Although CCA has been shown to prevent the development of the autoimmune disorders in NZB/W F1 mice and in MRL/l mice, the precise mechanism of its action has not yet been clarified. The current study examined the effect of CCA on the in vitro production of anti-DNA antibody, a hallmark of the autoimmune disorders. In vitro anti-DNA antibody production was induced from highly purified B cells of normal human individuals by stimulation with Staphylococcus aureus and CD4+ T cells or with immobilized anti-CD3 activated CD4+ T cells. CCA suppressed the production of anti-DNA antibody as well as IgM at pharmacologically obtainable concentrations (10-50 micrograms/ml). CCA did not inhibit the initial stages of B cell activation in either culture system, but rather suppressed the maturation of previously activated B cells. Although CCA suppressed IL2 production by immobilized anti-CD3 activated CD4+ T cells, its suppressive effects on B cells were not overcome by the addition of IL2 or factors generated from mitogen activated T cells (TF). CCA did not suppress IL6 production by immobilized anti-CD3 activated CD4+ T cells nor that by B cells activated with SA+ IL2. These results indicate that CCA suppresses the production of anti-DNA antibody by directly inhibiting activated B cells. The data therefore suggest the possible efficacy of CCA in suppressing the function of activated B cells in human SLE patients.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Toxicity profiles of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis.

The toxicity profiles of 7 disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) (hydroxychloroquine, intramuscular (im) gold, D-penicillamine, oral gold, methotrexate (MTX), azathioprine and cyclophosphamide) were evaluated in 2,479 patients with rheumatoid arthritis consecutively enrolled at 5 centers in the Arthritis, Rheumatism and Aging Medical Information System (ARAMIS) program. Incidence rates for side effects are reported as events/1000 patient-years. Our descriptive study revealed an individual profile of prevalent toxicities for each drug. Oral gold was characterized by substantial lower gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (diarrhea 391 events/1000 patient-years, loose bowel movement 148, lower abdominal pain 76), MTX by hepatotoxicity (47) while D-penicillamine had the only clinically significant incidence of altered taste (40). MTX users reported the most mucosal ulcers (87), followed by oral gold (76), im gold (55) and D-penicillamine (38). Rash was frequently seen with gold compounds and D-penicillamine, while upper GI toxicity was common with immunosuppressive agents. Cyclophosphamide had 48% discontinuations within 6 months. MTX had the lowest discontinuation rate in the first 6 months, but then showed little difference from im gold. A preliminary similarity index was developed to compare the toxicity profiles of various DMARD. Close similarities were found between toxicity profiles of im gold and D-penicillamine, and between azathioprine and MTX. Oral gold had a unique toxicity pattern. Knowledge of these different toxicity patterns can enable more appropriate selection of agents for particular patients.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed1990

Biologic properties of romazarit (Ro 31-3948), a potential disease-modifying antirheumatic drug.

The biologic effects of a new potential disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, romazarit (Ro 31-3948, 2-[[2-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-methyl-5-oxazolyl]methoxy]-2-methylpropio nic acid), have been investigated. In a 5-day adjuvant arthritis model, romazarit inhibited the development of hindpaw inflammation with a minimum effective dose of 30 mg kg-1. Plasma levels of the acute phase reactants seromucoid and haptoglobulin were also significantly reduced. Romazarit was equally effective in adrenalectomized animals, indicating that the compound is not acting via stimulation of the pituitary/adrenal axis. When the developing adjuvant arthritis was extended to 15 days romazarit showed dose-related improvements of all the symptoms of arthritis with a minimum effective dose of 25 mg kg-1. Romazarit caused a dose-dependent (range 20-250 mg kg-1) reduction in both the inflammatory and bony changes occurring during collagen arthritis in the rat, without any significant effect on anticollagen antibody titers except at the highest dose. Collagenase and prostaglandin E2 production in cultures of talus bones taken from rats with collagen arthritis were reduced by romazarit. In vitro romazarit was an extremely weak inhibitor of prostaglandin synthetase activity in both sheep seminal vesicle (IC50 6500 microM) and rat renal medulla (IC50 greater than 300 microM) cell-free preparations. Romazarit showed little or no activity in models of acute inflammation such as rabbit skin edema, carrageenan pleurisy or UV-induced erythema. In both acute and chronic tests romazarit displayed no ulcerogenic potential. In comparison with the structurally similar compound clobuzarit, hepatic changes such as increases in catalase and peroxisome proliferation-associated 80,000 mol.wt. protein were markedly less with romazarit. Clinical studies with romazarit are currently in progress.

Animals↗

PubMed2026

Disease-modifying therapy uptake in a pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis population, British Columbia, Canada.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is evolving as disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) undergo pediatric clinical trials. However, most DMTs remain off-label in children resulting in barriers to access and variability in treatment patterns across jurisdictions. The aim of this study was to describe trends in DMT uptake in POMS in British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: We utilized linked clinical and administrative datasets to identify MS with onset <18 years-of-age and assess DMT uptake from dispensed prescriptions between January 1, 1996 and March 1, 2020 in British Columbia, Canada. RESULTS: Of 173 POMS cases (median follow-up = 11.5 years), 32 (18%) filled a DMT prescription <18 years-of-age; 76 (44%) did so at any age. Moderate-efficacy therapies (beta-interferons/glatiramer acetate/teriflunomide/dimethyl fumarate) were the initial DMT in 60 cases (79%) overall, however by the end of follow-up a high-efficacy therapy was the most recent DMT dispensed for 52/76 cases (68%). After 2016, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies became the most common DMT class dispensed. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-efficacy therapies were the more common initial DMT dispensed for individuals with POMS, but more than two-thirds eventually received a high-efficacy therapy. Only a minority of POMS cases were first dispensed a DMT under age 18 years.

Disease modifying therapies↗

PubMed1992

Regulation of B cell function by lobenzarit, a novel disease-modifying antirheumatic drug.

OBJECTIVE: Lobenzarit (disodium 4-chloro-2,2'-iminodibenzoate [CCA]) is a novel disease-modifying drug for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although its clinical efficacy has been demonstrated, its mechanism of action remains unclear. We therefore examined the effects of CCA on in vitro IgM and IgM rheumatoid factor (IgM-RF) production by human B cells. METHODS: IgM and IgM-RF production was induced from highly purified B cells from 8 healthy donors by stimulation with Staphylococcus aureus Cowan 1 (SAC) plus factors generated from mitogen-activated T cells (TCF) or with immobilized anti-CD3-activated CD4+ T cells. RESULTS: CCA suppressed the production of IgM-RF as well as IgM at concentrations of 25-50 micrograms/ml (therapeutic serum concentrations of the drug), although the IgM-RF production induced by SAC plus TCF was suppressed at lower concentrations of CCA (1-3 micrograms/ml). Whereas CCA suppressed interleukin-2 (IL-2) production by anti-CD3-activated CD4+ T cells, its suppressive effects on B cells were not overcome by addition of IL-2 or TCF. CCA did not inhibit the initial stages of B cell activation in either culture system, but rather, suppressed the maturation of previously activated B cells. Cell cycle analysis by acridine orange staining indicated that CCA-mediated inhibition of B cell responsiveness induced by anti-CD3-activated CD4+ T cells was the result of a block at the G1-S interphase. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that CCA suppresses the production of IgM and IgM-RF by directly inhibiting activated B cells. Thus, one of the actions of CCA in RA may be the suppression of the function of activated B cells.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed1976

Cyclophosphamide, gold and penicillamine--disease-modifying drugs in rheumatoid arthritis--tailored dosage and ultimate success.

Gold appears to be the disease-modifying drug of first choice for two reasons: response and absence of long-term toxicity. Although cyclophosphamide produces results as good or better than gold, the possible long-term toxicity outweighs the clinical benefit except in the unusual case. Penicillamine appears to be an acceptable drug of second choice.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗

PubMed1992

Variations among rheumatologists in prescribing and monitoring of disease modifying antirheumatoid drugs.

One hundred consultant rheumatologists were sent a questionnaire on their prescribing pattern, and dose and monitoring schedules of four disease modifying antirheumatoid drugs (DMARDs). Seventy-five completed questionnaires were received. Sulphasalazine was the most popular first choice DMARD. There was general agreement on dose schedules which were similar to those recommended in the data sheets although for each drug a minority used different dose schedules. There was, however, marked variation among respondents in what was accepted as an adequate trial of therapy, in monitoring schedules and in the interpretation of results of toxicity monitoring. In many cases these practices differed significantly from the data sheet recommendations. These differences in stated practice could have financial and medicolegal as well as clinical implications.

Antimalarials↗