PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Donepezil”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Donepezil improves cognition and global function in Alzheimer disease: a 15-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Donepezil Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Donepezil hydrochloride (Aricept) is a selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor developed for the treatment of Alzheimer disease. This phase 3 study was 1 of 2 pivotal trials undertaken to establish the efficacy and safety of using donepezil in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer disease. OBJECTIVES: To further examine the efficacy and safety of using donepezil in the treatment of patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer disease. To examine the relationships between plasma donepezil concentrations, inhibition of red blood cell acetylcholinesterase activity, and clinical response. METHODS: This was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial with a 3-week single-blind washout. Outpatients at 23 centers in the United States were randomized to receive placebo, 5 mg of donepezil hydrochloride, or 10 mg of donepezil hydrochloride (5 mg/d during week 1 then 10 mg/d thereafter) administered once daily at bedtime. Primary efficacy was measured using the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) and Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change including caregiver information (CIBIC plus). RESULTS: A total of 468 patients entered the study, more than 97% of whom were included in the intention-to-treat (end point) analyses. The use of donepezil produced statistically significant improvements in ADAS-cog, CIBIC plus, and Mini-Mental State Examination scores, relative to placebo. The mean drug-placebo differences, at end point, for the groups receiving 5 mg/d and 10 mg/d of donepezil hydrochloride were, respectively, 2.5 and 3.1 units for ADAS-cog (P<.001); 0.3 and 0.4 units for CIBIC plus (P< or =.008); and 1.0 and 1.3 units for Mini-Mental State Examination (P< or =.004). On the CIBIC plus scale, 32% and 38% of patients, respectively, treated with 5 mg/d and 10 mg/d of donepezil hydrochloride demonstrated clinical improvement (a score of 1, 2, or 3) compared with placebo (18%). The mean (+/-SEM) donepezil plasma concentrations at study end point were 25.9 +/- 0.7 ng/mL and 50.6 +/- 1.9 ng/mL in the groups receiving dosages of 5 mg/d and 10 mg/d, respectively. Corresponding mean (+/-SEM) percentages of inhibition of red blood cell acetylcholinesterase activity were 63.9% +/- 0.9% and 74.7% +/- 1.2% for these 2 dosages, respectively. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between plasma concentrations of donepezil and acetylcholinesterase inhibition; the EC50 (50% effect) was obtained at a concentration of 15.6 ng/mL. A plateau of inhibition (80%-90%) was reached at plasma donepezil concentrations higher than 50 ng/mL. The correlations between plasma drug concentrations and both ADAS-cog (P<.001) and CIBIC plus (P = .006) were also statistically significant, as were the correlations between red blood cell acetylcholinesterase inhibition and change in ADAS-cog (P<.001) and CIBIC plus (P = .005). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events with both dosages of donepezil (68%-78%) was comparable with that observed with placebo (69%). The use of 10 mg/d of donepezil hydrochloride was associated with transient mild nausea, insomnia, and diarrhea. There were no treatment-emergent clinically significant changes in vital signs or clinical laboratory test results. More important, the use of donepezil was not associated with the hepatotoxic effects observed with acridine-based cholinesterase inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Donepezil hydrochloride (5 and 10 mg) administered once daily is a well-tolerated and efficacious agent for treating the symptoms of mild to moderately severe Alzheimer disease.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer's disease: results of a US Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. The Donepezil Study Group.

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of donepezil in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease, and examined the relationships between plasma donepezil concentration, red blood cell acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity and clinical response. The trial was of a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group design and patients were randomised to once-daily treatment with either donepezil (1, 3 or 5 mg) or placebo. The 12-week double-blind phase was followed by a 2-week single-blind placebo washout. 161 patients (55-85 years of age) entered the study and 141 completed treatment. Patients treated with donepezil showed dose-related improvements in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale score (ADAS-cog) and in MMSF scores. The improvements in ADAS-cog were statistically significantly greater with donepezil 5 mg/day than with placebo. There was a 50% reduction in the percentage of patients showing clinical decline with donepezil at 5 mg/day (11%) relative to placebo (20%). In addition, a statistically significant correlation between plasma concentrations of donepezil and AChE inhibition was demonstrated. A plateau of inhibition (76-84%) was reached at plasma donepezil concentrations > 50 ng/ml. The correlation between plasma drug concentrations and ADAS-cog (p = 0.014), MMSE (p = 0.023) and patient quality of life scores, assessed by the patient (p = 0.037) were also statistically significant, as was the correlation between AChE inhibition and change in ADAS-cog (p = 0.008). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events with all three dosages of donepezil (64-68%) was comparable to that observed with placebo (65%). Donepezil had no clinically significant effect on vital signs, haematology or clinical biochemistry tests. Importantly, donepezil was not associated with any hepatotoxicity, as observed with acridine-based cholinesterase inhibitors.

Acetylcholinesterase↗
PubMed1998

A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Donepezil Study Group.

The efficacy and safety of donepezil as a treatment for patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) was investigated in a multicenter, double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with placebo (n = 162), 5 mg/d donepezil (n = 154), or 10 mg/d donepezil (n = 157) for 24 weeks followed by a 6-week, single-blind placebo washout. The primary efficacy measures were the cognitive portion of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog) and the Clinician's Interview Based Assessment of Change-Plus (CIBIC plus), with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of the Boxes (CDR-SB), and patient rated Quality of Life (QoL) used as secondary measures. Cognitive function, as measured by the ADAS-cog, was significantly improved in the 5- and 10-mg/d donepezil groups as compared with the placebo group at weeks 12, 18, and 24. Clinician's global ratings on the CIBIC plus also improved in both the 5- and 10-mg/d donepezil groups relative to placebo. At the end of the 6-week placebo washout phase, ADAS-cog scores and CIBIC plus ratings were not significantly different for the three groups. Significant treatment benefits were also observed consistently in both the 5- and 10-mg/d groups on the MMSE and the CDR-SB, but there was no consistent effect on the patient-rated QoL. Cholinergic side effects (primarily diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting) were reported more often in the 10-mg/d group than either the 5-mg/d or placebo groups. Side effects were transient and generally mild in severity. These data indicate that donepezil is a well-tolerated drug that improves cognition and global function in patients with mild to moderate AD.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of donepezil HCl following evening administration.

AIMS: The primary objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single daily doses of donepezil (5 and 10 mg) each evening for 28 consecutive days. A secondary objective was to measure the plasma protein binding of donepezil at steady state. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, multiple-dose study in healthy male (n=13) and female (n=3) volunteers. Subjects were randomized to receive, once daily, either oral doses of 5 mg donepezil for 28 days or doses of 5 mg donepezil for 7 days followed by 10 mg donepezil for 21 days. All doses were administered in the evening. Donepezil concentrations and protein binding in plasma were determined by HPLC with UV detection and equilibrium dialysis, respectively. Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity in red blood cell (rbc) membranes was assessed using a specific radioenzyme assay. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of donepezil were linear, dose proportional and stationary over the course of the study. Mean Cmax, tmax, AUC(0-24), t1/2 and Vlambda(z)/F at steady state were 34.1 ng ml(-1), 3.0 h, 634.8 ng h ml(-1), 72.7 h, and 11.81 kg(-1), respectively, for the 5 mg group and 60.5 ng ml(-1), 3.9 h, 1127.8 ng h ml(-1), 73.5 h and 11.61 kg(-1), respectively, for the 10 mg group. Accumulation of the drug was observed for 14-21 days, until steady state was achieved. A direct consistent relationship was observed between donepezil plasma concentration and percentage rbc-AChE inhibition during each 24 h evaluation period, indicating no hysteresis in donepezil pharmacodynamics. The pharmacodynamic parameters, Emin, Emax and Ess, were 62.2%, 71.8% and 65.3%, respectively, for the 5 mg donepezil dose, and 74.7%, 83.6% and 77.8%, respectively, for the 10 mg donepezil dose. Donepezil was 95.6% bound to plasma protein at steady state. The binding was high capacity and low affinity, and neither concentration nor time dependent. Both dosage regimens were well tolerated; no clinically significant changes in laboratory or vital sign parameters were observed in any subject. CONCLUSIONS: The measured pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters for both 5 and 10 mg day(-1) donepezil administered in the evening are in good agreement with previous results obtained with morning administration, indicating no time of dosing effect.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

Concurrent administration of donepezil HCl and ketoconazole: assessment of pharmacokinetic changes following single and multiple doses.

AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics of donepezil HCl and ketoconazole separately, and in combination, following administration of single and multiple oral doses. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, three-period crossover study in healthy volunteers (n=21). During each treatment period, subjects received single daily doses of either donepezil HCl (5 mg), ketoconazole (200 mg), or a combination of both drugs for 7 consecutive days. Pharmacokinetic comparisons were made between treatment groups for the day 1 and day 7 profiles. Each treatment period was followed by a 3-week, drug-free washout period. RESULTS: On both day 1 and day 7, a statistically significant difference was observed between the donepezil and the donepezil + ketoconazole treatment groups in terms of Cmax and AUC(0-24) of donepezil. The concurrent administration of both drugs resulted in a 12% greater Cmax (9.5 ng ml(-1) versus 8.4 ng ml(-1); P=0.01) and a 12% greater AUC(0-24) (135.2 ng h ml(-1) versus 118.7 ng h ml(-1); P=0.001) than donepezil alone on day 1, and a 26.8% greater Cmax (37.7 ng ml(-1) versus 27.6 ng ml(-1); P < 0.0001) and a 26.4% greater AUC(0-24) (680.9 ng h ml(-1) versus 501.0 ng h ml(-1); P<0.0001) than donepezil alone on day 7. In contrast, ketoconazole plasma concentrations were unaffected by the concurrent administration of donepezil, and there were no statistically significant differences in ketoconazole pharmacokinetics when ketoconazole administered alone was compared with ketoconazole administered with donepezil. CONCLUSIONS: The concurrent administration of ketoconazole and donepezil produces no change in ketoconazole plasma concentrations, but a statistically significant change in donepezil plasma concentrations. These observed changes, which are smaller than those produced by ketoconazole for other agents sharing the CYP-3A4 pathway, are most likely the result of donepezil also being metabolized by CYP-2D6, as well as its slow rate of clearance from plasma.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Donepezil for psychotropic-induced memory loss.

BACKGROUND: Donepezil is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor marketed for treatment of memory loss and behavioral deterioration associated with the acetylcholine deficit of Alzheimer's disease. We investigated the utility and tolerability of donepezil in nongeriatric affective illness for treatment of psychotropic-induced memory loss, dry mouth, and constipation. METHOD: Nondemented outpatients with stabilized DSM-IV affective illness took 5 mg/day of donepezil for 3 weeks and then increased to 10 mg/day in open trials. Self-rating scales of target symptoms were completed by patients before and 3 to 4 weeks after starting each dose condition. Patients who chose to continue donepezil therapy returned for clinical monitoring every 4 to 8 weeks. RESULTS: Eleven women and 11 men (mean +/- SD age = 45.4+/-8.5 years) completed donepezil trials. Nineteen patients with memory loss rated improvement while taking 5 mg/day of donepezil (p<.001); subsequently, 6 rated further improvement with 10 mg/day (p = .057). Donepezil, 5 mg/day, also reduced ratings of dry mouth (N = 16; p<.001) and constipation (N = 11; p<.05). Side effects included insomnia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea; surprisingly, 2 bipolar patients became manic within hours of starting donepezil. Sixteen patients (72%) continued donepezil for an average of 7 months. Consideration of family histories suggested that donepezil response in affective illness may be an early indicator of vulnerability to dementia of the Alzheimer's type. CONCLUSION: (1) Donepezil can reduce memory loss, dry mouth, and constipation in nongeriatric affective patients, but may trigger mania; and (2) long-term follow-up will reveal the predictive value for dementia of donepezil's memory restoration in nongeriatric subjects.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of donepezil HCl following single oral doses.

AIM: The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of donepezil HCl, a chemically distinct and specific acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, following administration of single oral doses. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, single-dose, placebo-controlled, sequential-group, ascending-dose study in healthy male volunteers (n = 48). Six dose levels were investigated, ranging from 0.3 to 6.0 mg. Donepezil concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC with UV detection. Pharmacodynamic activity was determined by the radioenzymatic measurement of erythrocyte membrane acetylcholinesterase (rbc-AChE) inhibition. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic disposition of donepezil was observed to be both linear and dose proportional following single-dose administration. The mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of donepezil was observed at 4.1+/-1.5 h. The mean terminal disposition half-life was 81.5+/-22.0 h. The post-absorption phase of the plasma concentration-time curves for the 4.0 mg and 6.0 mg doses appeared to be biphasic, but the rate of donepezil clearance was independent of dose. Plasma concentrations for the 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9 mg dose groups were generally below the level of HPLC detection (2.0 ng ml(-1)), preventing accurate characterization of these doses. A direct correlation was observed between plasma donepezil concentrations and extent of AChE inhibition. For the 4.0 and 6.0 mg donepezil dose groups, maximal AChE inhibition (Emax) ranged from 33% to 35% and there was significant correlation between AChE inhibition and donepezil plasma concentration (P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of donepezil were found to be linear and dose proportional following the administration of single doses to healthy volunteers. A direct correlation was also observed between plasma donepezil concentrations and AChE inhibition. The extended half-life of donepezil makes it suitable for once-daily dosing.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of donepezil HCl following multiple oral doses.

AIM: The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of donepezil HCl, a new, chemically distinct and specific acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, following multiple-dose administration. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study in healthy male volunteers (n=27). Three dose levels were investigated in sequential order: 1, 3 and 5 mg. Each dose was administered orally, once a day, for 21 consecutive days. Donepezil concentrations in plasma were quantified by HPLC. Pharmacodynamic activity was determined by the radioenzymatic measurement of erythrocyte membrane acetylcholinesterase (rbc-AChE) inhibition. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic disposition of donepezil was observed to be dose proportional. The mean terminal disposition half-life was 79.5+/-19.0 h which resulted in a slow approach to steady state (14-21 days). A four- to sixfold increase in donepezil plasma concentration was observed during this time; however, no further increase was evident after achievement of steady state. The mean donepezil plasma concentration at steady state (Css) was 14.2 ng ml(-1). Neither the rate of accumulation nor the rate of clearance was dose dependent. Inhibition of rbc-AChE was directly correlated with donepezil concentration over a wide concentration range, with the higher concentrations showing the expected hyperbolic relationship. Donepezil was well tolerated by all subjects with no clinically significant changes in laboratory or physical parameters observed at any dose. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of donepezil were found to be dose proportional following the administration of multiple doses to healthy volunteers. A predictable relationship was also observed between plasma donepezil concentrations and rbc-AChE inhibition. The half-life of donepezil makes it suitable for once-daily dosing.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

Donepezil: an anticholinesterase inhibitor for Alzheimer's disease.

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, drug interactions, and dosage and administration of donepezil are reviewed. Donepezil is a synthetic noncovalent reversible inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) for the treatment of mild to moderate dementia associated with Alzheimer's disease. In contrast to tacrine hydrochloride, the only comparable agent currently approved by FDA, donepezil exhibits a relatively high degree of selectivity for neuronal AChE as opposed to butyrylcholinesterase. It has a half-life of 60 hours in young adults and 104 hours in elderly patients. In clinical trials, donepezil has been associated with significant improvements in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale and Clinical Interview-Based Impression of Change scores. The most common adverse effects associated with donepezil are nausea, diarrhea, anorexia, and vomiting, which are most likely to occur during dose initiation or adjustment. Hepatotoxicity, a dose-limiting adverse effect that sometimes requires discontinuation of tacrine, has not been reported with donepezil. Donepezil does not appear to interact with theophylline, cimetidine, warfarin, or digoxin. Ketoconazole and quinidine inhibit the metabolism of donepezil in vitro, but there is a lack of clinical data showing that these drugs decrease the clearance of donepezil. The initial recommended dosage is 5 mg daily before bedtime, with a dosage increase to 10 mg after four to six weeks according to the patient's response and tolerance. Donepezil appears to be preferable to tacrine as the initial agent for patients with mild to moderate dementia associated with Alzheimer's disease.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Metabolism and elimination of 14C-donepezil in healthy volunteers: a single-dose study.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the metabolism and elimination of donepezil HCl in humans, following the administration of a single 5 mg (liquid) oral dose containing a mixture of unlabelled and 14C-labelled donepezil. METHODS: This was an open-label, non-randomized study in healthy male volunteers (n = 8). Characterization of donepezil metabolism and elimination was performed by analysing blood, urine and faecal samples collected over a 10-day period following drug administration. Each collected sample was assayed for total radioactivity, and aliquots from specified time-points and/or pooled samples were assayed for the presence of donepezil metabolites by thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Donepezil concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC. RESULTS: Recovery of radioactivity in subject samples averaged 72% of the administered dose. Recovery of the administered dose in urine (57%) was significantly greater than that recovered in faeces (15%). Unchanged donepezil accounted for the largest component of the recovered dose in each matrix. Three metabolic pathways were identified: (i) O-dealkylation and hydroxylation to metabolites M1 and M2, with subsequent glucuronidation to metabolites M11 and M12; (ii) hydrolysis to metabolite M4; and (iii) N-oxidation to metabolite M6. In plasma, the parent compound accounted for about 25% of the dose recovered during each sampling period, as well as of the cumulative dose recovered. The recovered residue showed higher levels of the hydroxylated metabolites M1 and M2 than of their glucuronide conjugates M11 and M12, respectively. In urine, the parent compound accounted for 17%, on average, of the dose recovered from each pooled sample, as well as of the total recovered dose. The major metabolite was the hydrolysis product M4, followed by the glucuronidated conjugates M11 and M12. In faeces, the parent compound also predominated, although it accounted for only 1%, of the recovered dose. A large percentage of the radioactivity in faeces consisted of unidentified very polar metabolites, which were retained at the TLC origin. Of the extracted metabolites, the hydroxylation products M1 and M2 were the most abundant, followed by the hydrolysis product M4 and the N-oxidation product M6. CONCLUSIONS: Donepezil is hepatically metabolized and the predominant route for the elimination of both parent drug and its metabolites is renal, as 79% of the recovered dose was found in the urine with the remaining 21% found in the faeces. Moreover, the parent compound, donepezil, is the predominant elimination product in urine. The major metabolites of donepezil include M1 and M2 (via O-dealkylation and hydroxylation), M11 and M12 (via glucuronidation of M1 and M2, respectively), M4 (via hydrolysis) and M6 (via N-oxidation).

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Effect of donepezil hydrochloride (E2020) on basal concentration of extracellular acetylcholine in the hippocampus of rats.

The effects of oral administration of the centrally acting acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors, donepezil hydrochloride (donepezil: E2020: (+/-)-2-[(1-benzylpiperidin-4-yl)methyl]-5,6-dimethoxy-indan-1-one monohydrochloride), tacrine (9-amino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroacridine hydrochloride) and ENA-713 (rivastigmine: (S)-N-ethyl-3-[(1-dimethyl-amino)ethyl]-N-methyl-phenylcarbamate hydrogentartrate), which have been developed for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, on the extracellular acetylcholine concentration in the hippocampus of rats were evaluated by using a microdialysis technique without adding cholinesterase inhibitor to the perfusion solution. We also compared the inhibition of brain AChE and the brain concentrations of these drugs. Donepezil at 2.5 mg/kg and tacrine at 5 mg/kg showed significant effects for more than 6 h. At these doses, the maximum increases were observed at about 1.5 h after administration of donepezil, and at about 2 h with tacrine, and were 499% and 422% of the pre-level, respectively. ENA-713 produced significant effects at doses of 0.625, 1.25 and 2.5 mg/kg, which lasted for about 1, 2 and 4 h, respectively. The maximum increases produced by these doses at about 0.5 h after administration were 190, 346 and 458% of the pre-level, respectively. The time courses of brain AChE inhibition with donepezil at 2.5 mg/kg, tacrine at 10 mg/kg and ENA-713 at 2.5 mg/kg were mirror images of the extracellular acetylcholine-increasing action at the same doses. The time courses of the brain concentrations of drugs after oral administration of donepezil at 2.5 mg/kg and tacrine at 10 mg/kg were consistent with those of brain AChE inhibition at the same doses, and there was a linear relation between these parameters. Brain concentration of ENA-713 at 2.5 mg/kg was below the limit of quantification at all time points measured. These results suggest that oral administration of donepezil, tacrine and ENA-713 increases acetylcholine concentration in the synaptic cleft of the hippocampus mostly through AChE inhibition, and that donepezil has a more potent activity than tacrine and a longer-lasting effect than ENA-713 on the central cholinergic system.

Acetylcholine↗
PubMed1999

A comparative study in rats of the in vitro and in vivo pharmacology of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitors tacrine, donepezil and NXX-066.

The in vitro and in vivo effects of the novel acetylcholinesterase inhibitors donepezil and NXX-066 have been compared to tacrine. Using purified acetylcholinesterase from electric eel both tacrine and donepezil were shown to be reversible mixed type inhibitors, binding to a similar site on the enzyme. In contrast, NXX-066 was an irreversible non-competitive inhibitor. All three compounds were potent inhibitors of rat brain acetylcholinesterase (IC50 [nM]; tacrine: 125 +/- 23; NXX-066: 148 +/- 15; donepezil: 33 +/- 12). Tacrine was also a potent butyrylcholinesterase inhibitor. Donepezil and tacrine displaced [3H]pirenzepine binding in rat brain homogenates (IC50 values [microM]; tacrine: 0.7; donepezil: 0.5) but NXX-066 was around 80 times less potent at this M1-muscarinic site. Studies of carbachol stimulated increases in [Ca2+]i in neuroblastoma cells demonstrated that both donepezil and tacrine were M1 antagonists. Ligand binding suggested little activity of likely pharmacological significance with any of the drugs at other neurotransmitter sites. Intraperitoneal administration of the compounds to rats produced dose dependent increases in salivation and tremor (ED50 [micromol/kg]; tacrine: 15, NXX-066: 35, donepezil: 6) with NXX-066 having the most sustained effect on tremor. Following oral administration, NXX-066 had the slowest onset but the greatest duration of action. The relative potency also changed, tacrine having low potency (ED50 [micromol/kg]; tacrine: 200, NXX-066: 30, donepezil: 50). Salivation was severe only in tacrine treated animals. Using in vivo microdialysis in cerebral cortex, both NXX-066 and tacrine were found to produce a marked (at least 30-fold) increase in extracellular acetylcholine which remained elevated for more than 2 h after tacrine and 4 h after NXX-066.

Acetylcholinesterase↗
PubMed1998

Concurrent administration of donepezil HCl and cimetidine: assessment of pharmacokinetic changes following single and multiple doses.

AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics of donepezil HCl and cimetidine separately, and in combination, following administration of multiple oral doses. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, three-period crossover study in healthy male volunteers (n=19). During each treatment period, subjects received single daily doses of either donepezil HCl (5 mg), cimetidine (800 mg), or a combination of both drugs for 7 consecutive days. Pharmacokinetic comparisons were made between groups for the day 1 and day 7 profiles. Each treatment period was followed by a 3-week, drug-free washout period. RESULTS: On both day 1 and day 7, a statistically significant difference was observed between the donepezil and the donepezil + cimetidine groups in terms of the Cmax and AUC(0-24) values for donepezil. The combination group had an 11-13% greater Cmax and a 10% greater AUC(0-24) than the donepezil-only group. No significant difference was observed between the tmax of the two treatment groups on day 1, and no significant differences in tmax, t1/2 or the rate of drug accumulation (RA) were observed between the groups on day 7. Cimetidine pharmacokinetics were essentially unchanged by co-administration of the two drugs. The donepezil + cimetidine treatment group had a 20% greater maximum cimetidine concentration (Cmax) than the cimetidine-only group (P= 0.001) on day 1, but not on day 7, and no difference was observed in any of the other pharmacokinetic parameters examined. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of donepezil HCl (5 mg) and cimetidine (800 mg) did not produce clinically significant changes in the pharmacokinetic profiles of either drug.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

An evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of donepezil HCl in patients with impaired hepatic function.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of donepezil HCl (5 mg) in patients with impaired hepatic function, following the administration of single oral doses. METHODS: This was an open-label, non-randomized study comparing the pharmacokinetic profile of donepezil in male volunteers with chronic compensated cirrhosis of the liver (n = 10) to that in healthy age- and sex-matched controls (n = 10). Each subject received a single 5 mg oral dose of donepezil. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analyses were taken at specified intervals up to 120-h post-dose. Concentrations of donepezil in plasma were determined by HPLC with UV detection. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in donepezil pharmacokinetics were observed between hepatically impaired patients and normal subjects, with the exception of Cmax. The hepatically impaired patients showed a statistically significant, but not clinically significant, higher mean Cmax value of 6.6 ng ml(-1) compared with the control group, which had a mean Cmax value of 4.8 ng ml(-1) (P=(0.022). This represented an increase of 37.5%. The observed changes in AUC values were smaller and not statistically different. The AUC(0-120) and AUC(0-infinity) were 7% and 21% larger in the hepatically impaired patients than in the normal subjects, respectively, although clearance and volume of distribution were almost identical in the two groups. The t1/2 increased by 20%, but this change was also not statistically significant. Donepezil was equally well tolerated by all subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that compromised hepatic function does not produce clinically significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of donepezil following single-dose administration. These results suggest that the administration of donepezil to patients with hepatic disease in clinical practice should not require any dosing modifications.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Economic evaluation of donepezil for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Donepezil is a new drug recently approved in the United States and Canada for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We estimated the cost-effectiveness of donepezil 5 mg daily as an adjunct to usual care in the management of persons with mild-to-moderate AD defined as a Mini-Mental Health State Examination (MMSE) score in the range 10 to 26. METHODS: Treatment effect data as MMSE change-over-baseline scores were obtained from a 30-week placebo-controlled trial of donepezil. MMSE scores beyond observed trial data were estimated using a Markov model with 10 cycles of 24 weeks based on the placebo MMSE progression observed in the trial. Data from AD subjects in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging were used to estimate costs of nursing home care, community services, medications, and caregiver time as a function of MMSE score. A clinic-based cohort study from Alberta was used to estimate the distribution of AD patients by MMSE score presenting for treatment. The effectiveness measure for the economic model was expected time (over 5 years) spent with nonsevere AD (MMSE > or = 10). RESULTS: Over 5 years of treatment, donepezil is predicted to reduce health care costs by CA$929 per patient but increase caregiver time costs by CA$48 per patient for an overall cost saving to society of CA$882 per patient. Patients not receiving donepezil are predicted to spend 2.21 years of the 5 years in nonsevere AD compared with 2.41 years for treated patients (a gain of just over 2 months). Sensitivity analysis reveals that cost savings per patient increase if more AD patients are assumed to survive to 5 years; however, if donepezil treatment continues when patients' MMSE score falls below 10, the incremental cost is higher for treatment at CA$1554 per patient. CONCLUSION: Based on the limited available data, our model predicts that the use of donepezil for mild-to-moderate AD in Canada is associated with lower 5-year costs and less time spent with severe AD when compared with the alternative of usual care with no donepezil therapy. As more reliable long-term data become available, these predictions should be confirmed and/or updated.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Concurrent administration of donepezil HCl and digoxin: assessment of pharmacokinetic changes.

AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics of donepezil HCl and digoxin separately, and in combination, following administration of single oral doses. Changes in cardiac conduction parameters following drug administration were also assessed. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, three-period crossover study in healthy male volunteers (n=12). During each treatment period, subjects received a single dose of either donepezil HCl (5 mg), digoxin (0.25 mg), or a combination of both drugs. Each treatment period was followed by a 2-week, drug-free washout period. RESULTS: All 12 volunteers completed the study without incident. No statistically significant differences in donepezil pharmacokinetics (Cmax, tmax, AUC(0-120), AUC(0-infinity) or t1/2) were observed when donepezil administered alone was compared with donepezil administered in combination with digoxin. Similarly, no statistically significant differences in digoxin pharmacokinetics were observed when digoxin was administered alone or in combination with donepezil. No clinically relevant changes in cardiac conduction (lead II ECG) were observed in any subject during any treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of single doses of donepezil HCl (5 mg) and digoxin (0.25 mg) produced no changes in the pharmacokinetic profile of either drug. In addition, co-administration produced no changes in cardiac conduction parameters during the 24 h of telemetry monitoring following drug administration.

Administration, Oral↗