SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “E-cigarette use”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

E-cigarette product characteristics and packaging features and interest in e-cigarette use: Results from a randomized within-person trial nested in three prospective cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Product characteristics and packaging may be key targets for regulation to reduce e-cigarette use among youth, but existing data are limited. METHODS: Data are from an experimental study (2018-2020) nested within three prospective cohorts (age 14-26) in southern California (N = 3565). Participants were shown five e-cigarette (e-liquid) packages in a random order that varied in flavor (sweet vs. tobacco), flavor name (descriptive ["blueberry cheesecake"] vs. concept ["smurf cake"] vs. none [number only]), and cartoon image on package (yes/no). For each stimuli, survey items assessed the following outcomes: product appeal (self-enjoyment, others' enjoyment; Likert scale [1-5]), susceptibility to use (use if friends offered, curiosity; 4 ordered responses [definitely not-definitely yes]), peer acceptability (definitely not-definitely yes), and perceived harm (definitely not-definitely yes). Mixed effects proportional odds models evaluated within-person effects of each factor (flavor, flavor name, cartoon) with each outcome. RESULTS: Participants reported greater appeal, susceptibility, and peer acceptability (OR range=3.7-16.9; ps<0.05), and lower perceived harm (OR=0.61; 95%CI=0.53, 0.70) for sweet (vs. tobacco-flavored) e-cigarettes; effects were progressively stronger for younger cohorts. The descriptive flavor name rated higher than the concept flavor (OR range=1.13-2.02; ps<0.05) or number only (OR range=1.18-1.69; ps<0.05) for appeal and susceptibility measures; no differences for concept vs. number were found. The cartoon image rated higher for appeal, curiosity, and peer acceptability (OR range=1.24-1.51; ps<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sweet flavors, descriptive flavor names, and cartoon images may increase the appeal of e-cigarettes among youth and young adults with no history of e-cigarette use, and are key targets for regulation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effectiveness of Embedded Social Media Content on E-cigarette Attitudes and Behaviors: Results from a Randomized Control Trial.

BACKGROUND: This longitudinal randomized controlled trial examined the effects of anti-vaping social media content on e-cigarette attitudes and intentions among U.S. young adults (ages 18-24; n=3,400). METHODS: Targeted content was embedded directly into participants' social media feeds, with varying levels of impressions. RESULTS: Results indicate that increased exposure to anti-vaping messages significantly elevated perceived risk of harm (β=0.11, 95% CI: 0.03-0.20, p < .01) and social unacceptability of e-cigarette use (β=0.10, 95% CI: 0.03-0.18, p < .01), while decreasing intentions to vape (RRR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.36-0.97, p < .05). Notably, these attitudinal shifts occurred even with relatively low ad exposure and over an extended intervention period, while controlling for the e-cigarette use status (never, former, or current) of participants. Discussion These findings support the effectiveness of digital media campaigns in influencing health-related behaviors and attitudes among young adults. Specifically, embedding anti e-cigarette content directly in the feed of young adults is shown to be effective in shifting attitudes in a space where these young adults are already engaged. Limitations include limited ad impressions and minimal change in ad awareness recall, suggesting future research should explore longer interventions and broader nicotine product messaging.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Patterns and implications of co-use between vaping and hallucinogens: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The co-occurrence use of e-cigarettes and hallucinogens has become increasingly common, particularly among youth and young adults. However, evidence regarding the association between these behaviors remains limited and fragmented. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize current evidence, examining the correlation between hallucinogen use and the likelihood of being an e-cigarette user. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to June 2025. Eligible studies measured both hallucinogen and e-cigarette use and reported quantitative associations between these behaviors. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments were performed independently by three reviewers using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random-effects model (REML). Certainty of evidence was evaluated with the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 247,904), and seven were included in the meta-analysis (n = 217,478). The pooled analysis demonstrated that hallucinogen users had 4.47 times higher odds of being e-cigarette users (OR: 4.47, 95% CI 2.72 to 7.34; p < 0.001; I2 = 95.7%, n = 7). The certainty of evidence was rated as low. CONCLUSIONS: Hallucinogen use is directionally and strongly associated with e-cigarette use across diverse populations. Although the direction of association was consistent across studies, the magnitude of effect was heterogeneous. These behaviors likely share psychosocial and environmental determinants, although alternative explanations, including shared genetic liability, recall bias, and residual confounding, cannot be excluded. Further longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the underlying mechanisms of this association and establish temporality. The findings also support integrating hallucinogen-use screening into e-cigarette prevention and harm-reduction programs targeting youth and young adults.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Transcranial Photobiomodulation Variables Assessment Battery: Development and Validation.

Transcranial photobiomodulation (tPBM) response variability is partly driven by biophysical characteristics such as skin tone and hair properties that attenuate photon penetration, and by lifestyle factors including sleep quality, alcohol use, and nicotine consumption that disrupt the mitochondrial and vascular pathways on which tPBM acts. To date, no validated self-report tool exists to capture these moderators systematically. To address this gap, the tPBM Variables Assessment Battery was developed and psychometrically evaluated. It integrates adapted versions of established measures (Brief Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, E-cigarette Dependence Scale, Hair Scale Assessment PRO, Monk Skin Tone Scale, and Heaviness of Smoking Index), validated wellbeing evaluators (Ryff's Psychological Wellbeing), and custom measures (Hairstyle Classification, Hair Color Classification). Face and content validity met recommended expert thresholds, internal consistency was acceptable across adapted subscales, and criterion validity analyses confirmed meaningful associations between the lifestyle components and PROMIS-10 global health outcomes. The battery is low-burden, digitally deployable, and psychometrically defensible, offering a practical tool for characterizing the variables most likely to moderate tPBM response in home-use studies.

Humans↗