SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “EIDETIC IMAGERY”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1976

The incidence of eidetic imagery as a function of age.

Many theorists suggest that eidetic imagery is important in early child development, but there have been few systematic attempts to test whether eidetic imagery varies inversely with age. A sample of 280 students, ranging in age from 5 to 18 years, was tested for eidetic imagery by methods designed to minimize the probability of confusion between eidetic imagery and visual memory imagery of any other type. As expected, the youngest age groups showed the highest frequency of eidetic imagery, and beyond age 7, the incidence did not vary systematically. The results are interpreted as indicating the plausibility of a theory which affords eidetic imagery a role in the early cognitive development of the child.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1982

Evidence for the uniqueness of eidetic imagery.

This research examined the performance of eidetic subjects, classified by the standard self-report criteria, on a set of objective and subjective measures. Eidetic subjects were statistically superior to controls on an 'accuracy of report' test and a superimposition task, but these differences were not so large as to provide compelling evidence for the uniqueness of eidetic imagery. Further experiments investigated the effects of stimulus manipulations--type of interference and level of illumination--on, respectively, visual retention and duration of phenomenal image. The pattern of effects differed markedly between eidetic subjects and a control group matched on a measure of capacity for visual memory. These findings provide converging evidence for a qualitative distinction between eidetic imagery and visual memory that does not rely on differences in storage capacity. Eidetic imagery appears to be a long-lasting, percept-like experience which varies considerably in clarity and definition; its duration is critically dependent on level of illumination and its contents are easily disrupted by after-coming visual stimuli.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1979

Accuracy of recall as a function of eidetic imagery.

90 subjects (45 boys and 45 girls) from Grades 3, 4, 5 were screened for eidetic imagery. Using Haber's criteria, 12 subjects were identified as having eidetic imagery. These subjects were randomly divided into two groups of six each with one group designated the experimental group and the other, the control group. Eidetic imagery was evoked in all subjects to the same stimuli. Members of the experimental group were tested for accuracy of recall while maintaining the images and those of the control group were tested for accuracy of recall after blinking their eyes and turning their heads to erase the images. Significantly more correct responses were given by the experimental than by the control group. Also, eidetic images were not always erased by blinking the eyes and turning the head, and eidetic images did not necessarily last longer than afterimages, as Haber has reported.

Child↗

PubMed1976

Frequency of eidetic imagery among hydrocephalic children.

A sample of 75 mentally retarded children, including 14 with arrested hydrocephalus, 39 with other diagnoses of brain damage, and 22 familial cases, was tested for eidetic imagery, in order to clarify the relationship between eidetric imagery and neuropathology. The hypotheses tested were that the frequency of eidetic imagery is higher among hydrocephalics than among other brain-damaged children and higher among hydrocephalics than among familials. The data confirmed the hypotheses and are interpreted as supporting a theory in which particular structural impairments in the visual system may delay neural development and result in a persistance of eidetic imagery.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1977

Eidetic imagery: longitudinal results in brain-damaged children.

There have only been a few attempts to assess whether eidetic imagery is inversely related to age. A sample of 15 known eidetikers from a previous study, having particular forms of brain damage, were retested after a lapse of 20 months. The hypothesis of the study was that older children are most likely to lose their capacity for seeing eidetic images over a period of 20 months than are younger children. The data confirmed the hypothesis and was interpreted as supporting the theory that eidetic imagery is a developmental process that decreases in importance over the course of a child's development.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1976

Eidetic imagery in two subjects after 46 years.

Two quantitative experiments involving eidetic imagery, performed in 1928-29 on two girls, ages 11 and 15 years, respectively, were repeated in every detail in 1974 on the same two persons. It was found that minor changes (perhaps unreliable) had occurred in the precision of eidetic projection, and that both Ss retained their ability to project a seen circle onto a target square and compare the two for "goodness of fit."

Adolescent↗

PubMed1977

Short-term treatment of phobia through eidetic imagery.

This paper presents a relatively new approach to the treatment of phobia. The technique is based on the special attributes of eidetic images. A discussion of relevant eidetic concepts and eidetic methodology is followed by two case histories that illustrate the therapeutic use of eidetic imagery.

Adult↗

PubMed1962