[PROTEINS IN EXUDATES, TRANSUDATES AND BLOOD SERUM. NEW TESTS FOR THE DIFFERENTIATION OF TRANSUDATES FROM EXUDATES].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the serum-ascites albumin gradient to the exudate-transudate concept in the classification of ascites. DESIGN: Prospective collection of ascitic fluid data from patients with well-characterized causes of ascites. SETTING: Hepatology inpatient and outpatient ward and consult service of a large, urban hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 901 paired serum and ascitic fluid samples were collected from consecutive patients with all forms of ascites. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The utility of the serum-ascites albumin gradient and the old exudate-transudate concept (as defined by ascitic fluid total protein concentration [AFTP]) were compared for their ability in discriminating the cause for ascites formation. RESULTS: The albumin gradient correctly differentiated causes of ascites due to portal hypertension from those that were not due to portal hypertension 96.7% of the time. The AFTP, when used as defined in the old exudate-transudate concept, classified the causes of ascites correctly only 55.6% of the time. This resulted in part because the AFTP of most spontaneously infected samples (traditionally expected to be exudates) was low, and the AFTP of most cardiac ascites samples (traditionally expected to be transudates) was high. CONCLUSIONS: The exudate-transudate concept should be discarded in the classification of ascites. The serum-ascites albumin gradient is far more useful than the AFTP as a marker for portal hypertension, but the latter remains a useful adjunct in the differential diagnosis of ascites.
The sesquiterpene lactone fraction of Saussurea lappa roots was evaluated for its effect on the transudative, exudative and proliferative phases of inflammation using the cotton pellet granuloma assay in rats. The fraction (25-100 mg/kg, p.o.) showed significant dose-dependent inhibition of the increase in wet weight of the cotton pellet at 3 h (transudative phase), leakage of dye from the bloodstream around granuloma at 24 h (exudative phase) and increase in dry weight of the cotton pellet on day 6 (proliferative phase). It significantly lowered the elevated biochemical parameters such as alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase, gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase and significantly elevated the lowered albumin concentration in serum. The studies suggest that the antiinflammatory activity of the sesquiterpene lactone fraction of S. lappa may, in part, be due to stabilization of lysosomal membranes and an antiproliferative effect.
In this study, 80 cases with pleural effusion hospitalized at the departments of Chest Diseases and Internal Medicine in the Medical School of Selcuk University, and 30 healthy people as control group were studied. Regarding to the diagnosis, pleural fluids were classified into two groups as follows; transudates and exudates. Difference between the mean pleural pseudocholinesterase levels of transudates and exudates was statistically significant (p< 0.001). Similar significance was also obtained in the mean pleural fluid/serum pseudocholinesterase ratios of the groups (p< 0.001). In determination of exudative fluids both sensitivity and specificity of the pleural fluid pseudocholinesterase level was 100%. Sensitivity and specificity of the pleural fluid/serum pseudocholinesterase ratio were 90 and 87%, respectively. We have concluded that pleural pseudocholinesterase level and pleural fluid/serum pseudocholinesterase ratio can be used as a parameter with high diagnostic efficiency in discrimination of pleural effusions as exudates and transudates.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The differentiation of pleural effusions as being either transudate or exudate is the first step in the diagnosis of pleural effusions. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of the various biochemical parameters to the traditional criteria of Light et al., for differentiating exudates from transudates. Ninety-three pleural fluid and sera specimens were obtained and classified as transudates or exudates on the basis of their diagnosis. Of the 93 pleural fluids, 21 were transudates, 72 were exudates. The efficiencies of different parameters for detection of exudates were as follows: The criteria of Light 96%; effusion cholesterol concentration 77%; serum-fluid albumin gradient 67%, pleural/serum alkaline phosphatase ratio 83%; effusion creatine kinase levels 91%; pleural/serum creatine kinase ratio 83%, and effusion uric acid 71%. Pleural/serum uric acid ratio was insignificant for the purpose of this study.
AIMS: To investigate whether cholesterol and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) measurements in fluids are more sensitive and specific markers for differentiating between exudates and transudates, as confirmed clinically, than the measurement of fluid total protein concentrations alone. PATIENTS/METHODS: Serum, pleural fluid, and ascitic fluid from 61 unselected patients were analysed retrospectively for LDH, cholesterol, and total protein. Clinical classification of transudate or exudate was reached independently by reviewing clinical details and laboratory data. RESULTS: Of 54 samples (40 pleural fluid and 14 ascitic fluid), 30 were classified clinically as exudates and 24 as transudates. Fluid LDH and fluid to serum protein ratio measurements were equally good at differentiating between exudates and transudates, with a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 79%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 84%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 86%. A combination of these parameters improved sensitivity to 100% and NPV to 100%, but lowered the specificity to 71% and PPV to 81%. This combination achieved a higher efficiency than Light's criteria. CONCLUSION: Routine measurement of fluid LDH values and the calculation of fluid to serum total protein ratios will aid in differentiating exudates from transudates.
Marbofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antimicrobial drug used in cattle for the treatment of respiratory infections. In this investigation the pharmacokinetics (PK) of marbofloxacin were determined after intravenous and intramuscular dosing at a dosage of 2 mg/kg. In addition the ex vivo pharmacodynamics (PD) of the drug were determined in serum and three types of tissue cage fluid (transudate, inflammatory exudate generated by carrageenan and exudate generated by lipopolysaccharide). Marbofloxacin PK was characterized by a high volume of distribution after dosing by both routes (1.28 L/kg intravenous and 1.25 L/kg intramuscular). Corresponding area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and elimination half-life (t(1/2)el) values were 9.99 and 10.11 microg h/mL and 4.23 and 4.33 h, respectively. Values of AUC for carrageenan-induced exudate, lipopolysaccharide-induced exudate and transudate were, respectively, 8.28, 7.83 and 7.75 microg h/mL after intravenous and 8.84, 8.53 and 8.52 microg h/mL after intramuscular dosing. Maximum concentration (Cmax) values were similar for the three tissue cage fluids after intravenous and intramuscular dosing. For in vivo PK data values of AUC: minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (AUIC) ratio for serum were 250 and 253, respectively, after intravenous and intramuscular dosing of marbofloxacin against a pathogenic strain of Mannheimia haemolytica (MIC=0.04 microg/mL). For all tissue cage fluids AUIC values were >194 and >213 after intravenous and intramuscular dosing, and Cmax/MIC ratios were 9 or greater, indicating a likely high level of effectiveness in clinical infections caused by M. haemolytica of MIC 0.04 microg/mL or less. This was confirmed by both in vitro (serum) and ex vivo (serum, exudate and transudate) measurements, which demonstrated a concentration-dependent killing profile for marbofloxacin against M. haemolytica. Ex vivo, after 24-h incubation, virtually all bacteria were killed (<10 cfu/mL) in all samples collected up to 9 h (serum), 24 h (carrageenan-induced exudate and transudate) and 36 h (lipopolysaccharide-induced exudate). Application of the sigmoid Emax equation to the ex vivo antibacterial data provided, for serum, AUIC24 h values of 37.1 for bacteriostasis, 46.3 for bactericidal activity and 119.6 for elimination of bacteria. These data may be used as a rational basis for setting dosing schedules which optimize clinical efficacy and minimize the opportunities for emergence of resistant organisms.
The aim of this study was to investigate the capability of Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRI to differentiate between exudative and transudative pleural effusions. An MRI examination was performed on 22 patients with different types of pleural effusion (10 transudative and 12 exudative effusions). T1-weighted SE images were obtained before and 20 min after administration of Gd-DTPA (0.1 mmol/kg). The degree of enhancement of pleural effusions was evaluated both by visual assessment and by quantitative analysis of images. None of 10 transudative effusions showed significative enhancement, whereas 10 of 12 exudative effusions showed enhancement (sensitivity 83 %, specificity 100 %, positive predictive value 100 %). The postcontrast signal intensity ratios (SIRs) of exudates were significantly higher than corresponding precontrast ratios (P = 0. 0109) and the postcontrast SIRs of exudates were significantly higher than those of transudates (P = 0.0300). Exudative pleural effusions show a significant enhancement following administration of Gd-DTPA. We presume that this may be caused by increased pleural permeability and more rapid passage of a large amount of Gd-DTPA from the blood into the pleural fluid in case of exudative effusions. In our limited group of patients, signal enhancement proved the presence of an exudative effusion. Absence of signal enhancement suggests a transudate, but does not exclude an exudate.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In a previous study we concluded that the pleural fluid/serum (PF/S) ratio of cholinesterase was the most useful parameter to discriminate between exudates and transudates. The objective of the present study was to confirm these findings in a prospective series of patients with pleural effusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 177 patients, consecutively studied at two institutions, with the diagnosis of pleural effusion were included in this study. Thirty-six (20.3%) effusion were transudates and 141 (79.7%) exudates; of these, 73 and 68 were of malignant and benign origin, respectively. Both PF/S cholinesterase and Light's criteria were compared. RESULTS: The PF/S cholinesterase ratio incorrectly classified 12 pleural effusions (6.8%). These included 7 out the 36 transudates (19.4%) and 5 out of the 141 exudates (3.5%), the latter of malignant etiology. Following Light's criteria, four (2.2%) exudates were misclassified, all of them transudates. The higher accuracy of Light's criteria was statistically significant (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In this series of patients, Light's criteria were more accurate than PF/S cholinesterase ratio to discriminate between transudates and exudates. From these results, the use of the PE/S cholinesterase ratio parameters is no longer recommended.
UNLABELLED: The differentiation between exudates and transudates is the initial step in the analysis of pleural effusions as it often gives an indication of the underlying pathophysiologic process, the differential diagnosis, and the need for further investigations. Four classifications have been suggested in the literature: Light's criteria, serum-effusion albumin gradient, effusion cholesterol concentration, and pleural/serum bilirubin concentration. AIM OF STUDY: To compare the various biochemical parameters used to identify exudates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A study was carried out from February 1993 to March 1994 at Tygerberg Hospital, South Africa. Five hundred pleural effusions and serum specimens were analyzed. After discharge, the hospital records of all patients were reviewed for a diagnosis. RESULTS: A reliable diagnosis could be made in 393 cases (270 exudates and 123 transudates). Using the criteria of Light and associates 93% of the effusions were correctly classified, yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 98% and 83%, respectively, to detect exudates. The serum-effusion albumin gradient at a cutoff level of 12 g/L yielded the following results: accuracy, 89%; sensitivity, 87%; and specificity, 92%. Using a cutoff level of 1.55 mmol/L, the effusion cholesterol concentration yielded results of 70%, 54%, and 92%, respectively. The results improved at lower cutoff levels for effusion cholesterol level. Use of the pleural/serum bilirubin ratio as a means for identifying exudates produced results of 75%, 81%, and 61%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The criteria of Light et al remain the best method for distinguishing exudates from transudates. The serum-effusion albumin gradient is useful when patients are receiving concurrent diuretic therapy.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of modifying Light's criteria for the separation of pleural transudates from exudates. DESIGN: Retrospective review of patients who underwent a diagnostic thoracentesis during a 2-year period. SETTING: Community teaching hospital in Lleida, Spain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical records and pleural fluid characteristics of 230 consecutive patients with pleural effusion underwent a detailed review. Thirty-five of these patients were excluded from the analysis. As suggested recently by Romero et al, different cutoff levels for the criteria of Light et al were applied and their accuracies were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (20%) pleural effusions were transudates and 156 (80%) were exudates. The accuracy of the criteria of Light et al for identifying exudates was 94.7% (confidence interval, 91.6 to 97.9) in comparison to our own modified criteria (93.1%; confidence interval, 89.5 to 96.7) and the criteria suggested by Romero et al (92.6%; confidence interval, 88.9 to 96.3). These differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Changing the classic Light's criteria with different cutoff points offers no advantages for discriminating between transudative and exudative pleural effusions.
OBJECTIVE: We compared the ascitic fluid to serum bilirubin ratio with three other ways of classifying ascitic fluid to the categories of exudate or transudate: the serum-ascites albumin gradient, the total protein concentration of the fluid, and the adaptation of Light's criteria for the detection of pleural fluid exudate, i.e., fluid to serum protein or LDH ratio or fluid LDH concentration. (Recently it has been reported that the pleural fluid to serum bilirubin ratio is statistically equivalent to Light's criteria.) Also, we evaluated whether the addition of the bilirubin ratio to the other criteria increases their diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Eighty-one specimens of ascitic fluid from 81 different patients were obtained. They were analyzed prospectively by SMA12, whereas the category of the fluid was determined according to the clinical diagnosis. The diagnostic accuracy of each criterion alone and in combination with the bilirubin ratio, with reference to the contended etiology, were evaluated. RESULTS: The best criterion is the albumin gradient (overall accuracy = 0.84). The bilirubin and LDH ratio criteria had equivalent overall accuracy (0.815 and 0.802, respectively). The addition of the bilirubin ratio to any criterion did not improve its predictive or overall accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Ascitic fluid to serum bilirubin ratio is an additional marker for the distinction of transudate from exudate. A ratio > 0.6 has a statistically significant association with exudate.
Physicians have a staggering variety of diagnostic tests available for directing their diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Technologic advances in laboratory science have increased the sophistication of new tests and accelerated their rate of adoption into clinical practice. Unfortunately, studies that report the value of new diagnostic tests often fail to follow accepted methodologic standards for unbiased test assessment or provide clinicians with sufficient information for the intelligent evaluation of a test's performance and applicability. The following review of pleural fluid tests that discriminate between exudative and transudative effusions serves to highlight important methodologic considerations in the assessment of diagnostic tests.
Previously established criteria were used to classify 253 pleural effusions as transudates (65 cases), neoplastic exudates (67 cases), tuberculous exudates (65 cases), or miscellaneous exudate (56 cases). The parameters pleural LDH (PLDH), pleural LDH/serum LDH ratio (P/SLDH), and pleural protein/serum protein ratio (P/SPROT) were compared with pleural cholesterol (PCHOL) and the pleural cholesterol/serum cholesterol ratio (P/SCHOL) with regard to their usefulness for distinguishing between pleural exudates and transudates. The PCHOL values determined were 28.5 +/- 12.8 mg/dl for transudates, 88.1 +/- 30 mg/dl for neoplastic exudates, 96.5 +/- 28 mg/dl for tuberculous exudates, and 88 +/- 35.9 mg/dl for the miscellaneous group; the differences between the transudate group and the others are statistically significant (p less than 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of P/SPROT for diagnosis of exudates were both 89 percent; the sensitivity of PLDH was 67 percent and its specificity was 95 percent; the sensitivity and specificity of P/SLDH were both 84.6 percent. Using Light's three criteria as a battery, the sensitivity was 94.6 percent and its specificity was 78.4 percent. All the transudates and 17 (9 percent) of the 188 exudates had PCHOL values below 55 mg/dl, so that with this threshold, PCHOL had a sensitivity of 91 percent and a specificity of 100 percent for diagnosis of exudates. With a threshold of 0.3, P/SCHOL had a sensitivity of 92.5 percent and a specificity of 87.6 percent. The number of misclassifications by PCHOL was less than with any other of the parameters, with statistically significant differences with respect to PLDH (p less than 0.001) and P/SLDH (p less than 0.01). We conclude that determination of PCHOL and P/SCHOL is of great value for distinguishing between pleural exudates and transudates, and should be included in routine laboratory analysis of pleural effusions.