PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Emergency general surgery”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Redefining the future of trauma surgery as a comprehensive trauma and emergency general surgery service.

BACKGROUND: Dwindling operative opportunities in trauma care may have a detrimental impact on career satisfaction among trauma surgeons and on career attractiveness to surgical trainees. Addition of emergency general surgery may alleviate some of these concerns. STUDY DESIGN: The trauma service at our institution incorporated nontrauma emergency general surgery over a 3-year period. The institution's trauma registry and hospital perioperative database were queried. The changes in operative caseload are described. Current trauma faculty anonymously completed a Web-based questionnaire about the addition of emergency general surgery to the trauma service. RESULTS: Operations for trauma decreased in 2002 compared with 1999, despite a higher number of penetrating injuries and total trauma contacts. Nontrauma general surgery operations performed by trauma faculty increased in proportion to coverage provided by the trauma service. In 2002, 57% of all cases performed by trauma surgeons were emergency general surgery, which accounted for 32% to 74% of an individual surgeon's caseload. In anonymously completed Web-based questionnaires, current trauma faculty expressed satisfaction with the combined trauma and emergency general surgery model. CONCLUSIONS: The combined trauma and nontrauma surgery service increased operative caseloads and improved satisfaction of trauma surgeons. A comprehensive trauma and emergency general surgery service may be an attractive model for the future of trauma surgery and provide logistical and medical advantages to the emergency general surgery patient population.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2004

Integrating emergency general surgery with a trauma service: impact on the care of injured patients.

BACKGROUND: There has been considerable discussion on the national level on the future of trauma surgery as a specialty. One of the leading directions for the field is the integration of emergency general surgery as a wider and more attractive scope of practice. However, there is currently no information on how the addition of an emergency general surgery practice will affect the care of injured patients. We hypothesized that the care of trauma patients would be negatively affected by adding emergency general surgery responsibilities to a trauma service. METHODS: Our institution underwent a system change in August 2001, where an emergency general surgery (ES) practice was added to an established trauma service. The ES practice included emergency department and in-house consultations for all urgent surgical problems except thoracic and vascular diseases. There were no trauma staff changes during the study period. Trauma registry data (demographics, injuries, injury severity, and procedures) and performance improvement data (peer-review judgments for all identified errors, denied days, audit filters, and deaths) were abstracted for two 15-month periods surrounding this system change. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and t tests provided between-group comparisons. RESULTS: The trauma staff evaluated a total of 5,874 patients during the 30-month study. There were 1,400 (51%) trauma admissions in the pre-ES group and 1,504 (48%) in the post-ES group, of which 1,278 and 1,434, respectively, met severity criteria for report to our statewide database (Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study [PTOS]). There were 163 (12.7% of PTOS) deaths in the pre-ES group compared with 171 (11.9% PTOS) deaths in the post-ES group (p = not significant [NS]). There was one death determined to be preventable by the peer review process for the pre-ES group, and none in the post-ES group. Both groups had 10 potentially preventable deaths, with the remaining mortalities being categorized as nonpreventable (p = NS). Unexpected deaths by TRISS methodology were 36 (2.8%) and 41 (2.9%) for the two groups, respectively (p = NS). There was no difference in the number of provider-specific complications between the groups (23, [1.8%] vs. 19 [1.3%], p = NS). The addition of emergency surgery has resulted in an additional average daily workload of 1.3 cases and 1.2 admissions. CONCLUSION: Despite an increase in trauma volume over the study period, the addition of emergency surgery to a trauma service did not affect the care of injured patients. The concept of adding emergency surgery responsibilities to trauma surgeons appears to be a valid way to increase operative experience without compromising care of the injured patient.

Emergency Service, Hospital↗
PubMed1984

Does dihydroergotamine potentiate the thromboprophylactic effect of dextran 70? A controlled prospective study in general and hip surgery.

In a prospective randomized controlled study on postoperative thromboembolism, 259 patients undergoing elective general surgery, emergency general surgery, total hip replacement or hip fracture surgery were given thromboembolic prophylaxis with either a combination of dextran 70 and dihydroergotamine (DHE) or with dextran 70 alone. 500 ml dextran 70 was infused twice on the day of operation, once on postoperative days 1 and 3, and also on day 5 if the patient was still confined to bed. 0.5 mg DHE was given s.c. twice daily starting before operation and continued for 3 or 5 postoperative days. In hip fracture patients prophylaxis was started as soon as the diagnosis was made. 500 ml dextran 70 was given every other day before operation. DHE was given twice daily if so indicated from randomization. The patients were screened for deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) with the 125I-labelled fibrinogen test for 8 days and followed for one month postoperatively. In hip fracture surgery the incidence of DVT was significantly reduced by the combination of dextran 70 and DHE compared to dextran 70 alone (1/32 vs. 11/36, P = 0.003). However, this synergistic effect of DHE could not be detected in the other patient groups. Fatal pulmonary embolism did not occur. No severe side effects attributable to prophylaxis were noted in either group.

Aged↗
PubMed2026

Interhospital transfer and outcomes after robotic emergency general surgery: a national analysis.

The outcomes of patients transferred to receiving centers who subsequently undergo robotic EGS remain uncharacterized at a national level. We aimed to quantify the association between transfer and outcomes among adults undergoing robotic EGS. We performed a retrospective cohort study of the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016-2019) including adult nonelective admissions undergoing robotic EGS. Interhospital transfer versus direct admission was the exposure. Survey-weighted logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for clinical outcomes; generalized linear models with gamma family and log link estimated adjusted mean ratios (aMR) for length of stay (LOS) and cost. Average marginal effects provided adjusted risks/means and absolute differences. Among 26,869 unweighted robotic EGS admissions, representing an estimated 46,517 admissions nationally, 246 unweighted admissions were interhospital transfers, representing an estimated 444 transfers (1.0%) nationally. Transfers were older, more comorbid, and more severely ill and were treated predominantly at large, teaching hospitals. After adjustment, transfer was associated with a higher risk of postprocedural complications (8.0% vs. 3.5%; aRR 2.26, 95% CI 1.25-3.27), non-home discharge (31.2% vs. 18.9%; aRR 1.65, 95% CI 1.38-1.92), longer LOS (11.49 vs. 5.53 days; AMR 2.08, 95% CI 1.78-2.42), and higher cost ($43,340 vs. $21,821; AMR 1.99, 95% CI 1.68-2.35). The association with postprocedural complications was attenuated after additional adjustment for APR-DRG Severity of Illness, whereas associations with non-home discharge, LOS, and cost persisted. Among patients undergoing robotic EGS, interhospital transfer is independently associated with higher complication burden and greater resource use. Transferred patients represent a small but distinctly high-risk subgroup whose worse outcomes may reflect drivers that extend beyond the choice of surgical approach.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Creating an emergency general surgery service enhances the productivity of trauma surgeons, general surgeons and the hospital.

BACKGROUND: Several models that integrate trauma and emergency general surgery (EGS) have been proposed to provide a diverse and challenging operative practice for trauma surgeons and improve recruitment. In July 2002, our institution established a 24/7 EGS consult service, staffed primarily by critical care/trauma surgeons (CCTS). The objective of this report was to evaluate the impact of this new service on CCTS, general surgeons (GS) and the hospital. METHODS: All admissions to CCTS and GS from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2003 were reviewed by querying hospital and physician databases for demographics, diagnoses, operative intervention(s), and resource utilization. Data were analyzed using nonparametric methods. RESULTS: [See ]. 9,405 admissions were identified, with GS and EGS admissions increasing over time. In July 2002, EGS became a separate service and captured 26% of GS admissions. Hospital-wide trauma admissions remained stable despite a slight decrease in trauma admissions to CCTS. A decrease in trauma operations by CCTS was offset by an increased EGS operative volume. EGS included "bread and butter" GS procedures including appendectomies and cholecystectomies and complex surgical procedures. EGS patients were often sicker with more than 50% requiring ICU admission compared with GS admissions of which only 10% required ICU care.(Table is included in full-text article.) CONCLUSIONS: Departmental restructuring to include an EGS service: 1) increased CCTS volume despite decreased CCTS trauma admissions and operations; 2) increased elective GS volume; 3) generated increased use of ICU and operating room resources; and 4) demonstrated that CCTS with broad operative GS backgrounds and critical care knowledge can effectively staff an EGS service.

Delivery of Health Care, Integrated↗
PubMed2004

Emergency general surgery and the implications for specialisation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To examine the overall spectrum of emergency general surgical admissions and operations in Edinburgh, to identify the influence of an Accident and Emergency (A&E) department and observe the current practice of sub-specialisation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data for all general surgical admissions and operations in the two main Edinburgh hospitals are recorded prospectively using the Lothian Surgical Audit system. These data were examined for 1999. RESULTS: 5346 patients were admitted to the two hospitals with acute surgical conditions. Head injuries (n = 1069, 20%) and Non Specific Abdominal pain (NSAP) (n = 855, 16%) made up a third of all emergency surgical admissions. The most common single category of operations were those done on the appendix (n = 348, 15%). The Royal Infirmary, with the only A&E department had more acute surgical admissions (n = 4071) than the Western General Hospital (n = 1275), surgeons in the Royal Infirmary also operated on a much lower percentage of patients (30% v 55%). In the Royal Infirmary, upper gastrointestinal surgeons treated a significantly higher proportion of patients with upper gastro-intestinal and hepatobiliary/pancreatic conditions than either the general or colorectal surgeons and, similarly, the colorectal surgeons treated a higher proportion of patients with colorectal conditions than either the general or upper gastro-intestinal surgeons. CONCLUSION: The spectrum of emergency admissions and operations in Edinburgh is consistent with previously published data. An A&E department alters the spectrum of diagnoses and, therefore, the overall workload. Specialisation in emergency surgery is already quite advanced. These results all have important implications in future healthcare planning.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2005

Protocol for bedside laparotomy in trauma and emergency general surgery: a low return to the operating room.

Bedside laparotomy (BSL) was introduced as a heroic procedure in trauma patients too unstable for safe transport to the operating room (OR). We hypothesize a BSL protocol would maintain patient safety while reducing OR use. Patients were prospectively entered into a BSL protocol from July 2002 to June 2003 and retrospectively reviewed. Protocol indications for BSL were abdominal compartment syndrome, decompensation due to hemorrhage, washout/closure, and sepsis in a patient too unstable for safe transport to the OR. Primary outcomes were mortality, emergent return to OR, and primary fascial closure (PFC). Trauma operating room charges and OR time were analyzed. One hundred thirty-three BSL were performed on 60 patients with an overall mortality of 23.3 per cent (14/60). There was an average of 2.2 BSL per patient (range 1-8). Indications for BSL were 1) explore/washout (n = 100, 75.2%), 2) decompression (n = 14, 10.5%), 3) infection/abscess (n = 12, 9.0%), 4) hemorrhage (n = 7, 5.3%). Five of 133 BSL (5.8%) were emergently returned to the OR because of perforation or compromised bowel. Trauma OR charges were dollar 5,300 per cases with 2.12 hours per cases. The protocol standardized the conduct of BSL procedure to allow for a low return to OR rate of 5.8 per cent and had an overall in-hospital mortality rate of 23.3 per cent. Primary fascial closure of the abdomen had a significantly reduced hospital stay. BSL allowed trauma OR charges of dollar 5,300 per cases with 2.12 hours per cases savings.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2026

Impact of PerioperAtive LidocAine Infusions on Enhanced Recovery After Noncardiac Surgery (IMPALA-ERAS) in an inpatient setting: rationale, design and protocol for a sequential, repeated crossover trial.

INTRODUCTION: Multimodal analgesic strategies designed to minimise perioperative opioid exposure are fundamental components of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways. Despite widespread implementation of ERAS protocols, the optimal analgesic regimen remains undefined, as the individual contributions of specific agents to overall analgesic efficacy and opioid-sparing effects are not fully elucidated. Intravenous lidocaine, a widely utilised local anaesthetic, possesses both analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties and has been associated with improved gastrointestinal recovery. This study seeks to pragmatically evaluate the impact of incorporating perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion into established ERAS pathways on postoperative functional recovery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Impact of PerioperAtive LidocAine Infusions (IMPALA) on ERAS trial is a single-centre, pragmatic, cluster-randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. A total of 2290 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, emergency general surgery, urology, ventral hernia repair, surgical oncology or spine surgery will be randomly assigned to receive either intraoperative and postoperative intravenous lidocaine infusions (administered for up to 48 hours) or placebo as part of a standardised multimodal analgesic regimen integrated into established ERAS pathways. The primary outcome is case mix index-adjusted resource length of stay, defined as the time interval from surgical initiation to hospital discharge adjusted for case mix index. The primary outcome is total inpatient opioid consumption within the first 72 hours, reported in oral morphine milligram equivalents. Secondary outcomes include various in-hospital clinical endpoints derived from the electronic health record. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol and accompanying statistical analysis plan outline the study design, primary and secondary endpoints and analytic methodology. The IMPALA-ERAS trial has received ethical approval from the Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board (IRB: 250617). The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national conferences. Results from this trial are expected to inform evidence-based practices regarding perioperative lidocaine infusion and its potential contributions to enhanced postoperative recovery in surgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07224711.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

Trauma and emergency surgery: an evolutionary direction for trauma surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The success of nonoperative management of injuries has diminished the operative experience of trauma surgeons. To enhance operative experience, our trauma surgeons began caring for all general surgery emergencies. Our objective was to characterize and compare the experience of our trauma surgeons with that of our general surgeons. METHODS: We reviewed records to determine case diversity, complexity, time of operation, need for intensive care unit care, and payor mix for patients treated by the trauma and emergency surgery (TES) surgeons and elective practice general surgery (ELEC) surgeons over a 1-year period. RESULTS: TES and ELEC surgeons performed 253 +/- 83 and 234 +/- 40 operations per surgeon, respectively (p = 0.59). TES surgeons admitted more patients and performed more after-hours operations than their ELEC colleagues. Both groups had a mix of cases that was diverse and complex. CONCLUSION: Combining the care of patients with trauma and general surgery emergencies resulted in a breadth and scope of practice for TES surgeons that compared well with that of ELEC surgeons.

Elective Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed2001

Emergency surgery: atavistic refuge of the general surgeon?

A prospective audit of emergency soft-tissue surgery for an eight-week period revealed that general surgical emergency operations were more than twice as common as those undertaken in other soft-tissue specialties. The audit reveals that emergency general surgery needs an increase in resources, an increase in available staff and an increase in the role of the consultant general surgeon on call. An alternative solution would be to admit soft-tissue emergencies by specialty and develop specialist emergency services.

Emergencies↗
PubMed1979

[Our experience in laparoscopic diagnosis in general and emergency surgery (author's transl)].

After a brief review of the history of laparoscopy starting from the first endoscope, the authors remark on the great usefulness, ease, and essential harmlessness of the procedure. They list all the possible uses of laparoscopy in general and emergency surgery, exemplifying their claims with the illustration of personal cases and recommending widespread use of the method in surgery.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Emergency surgery for generalized peritonitis caused by cytomegalovirus colitis in a patient with AIDS.

Cytomegalovirus infection of the colon is a late and severe complication in human immunodeficiency virus patients. Despite availability of medical treatment, occasional life-saving emergency surgery must be performed. The controversial surgical aspects of treatment are discussed based upon an unusual case of aseptic generalized peritonitis without perforation. The feasibility and value of limited resection are emphasized.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2005

What price for general surgery?

BACKGROUND: This study aims to determine the cost-benefit analysis of adding a full emergency general surgery (EGS) arm to a trauma/critical care (TCC) service with limited EGS activity in a Level I trauma center. METHODS: Data on the composition, activity, and billings of a TCC were collected and compared before (January 1, 2002-June 30, 2003) and after (July 1, 2003-December 31, 2003) it assumed the care of all unassigned EGS patients. These included patient volume and demographics, service, procedures, on-call/service activity, and professional billings and collections. Data are means +/- SD or percentages. Intergroup comparisons were performed by using t test or chi2 as appropriate; significance was assumed for values of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Deploying an EGS arm increased coverage weeks (+52 weeks) and necessitated additional staffing (pre-EGS, n = 5; post-EGS, n = 6). Trauma operative volume remained constant (8.2 vs. 10.3 per month), EGS and elective case load increased (28.7 vs. 60 per month; p < 0.01), and the EGS case/consult ratio decreased from 0.81 to 0.64 (p < 0.01). This expanded activity was associated with reduced on-call nonclinical hours, from 3.2 +/- 0.9 to 1.1 +/- 0.8 (p < 0.01), and increased outpatient visits (68.6 vs. 91.1 per month; p < 0.01) and off-service time used for elective operations (22.3 vs. 76%; p < 0.01). Billings significantly increased in each arm compared with the pre-EGS study period (operating room, +44.8; intensive care unit, +12.5; outpatient, +48.7%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Integrating a full EGS into a TCC service encumbers increased nontrauma unscheduled clinical activity in the operating room, clinic, and floors, which resulted in enhanced billings. These beneficial effects were accrued at the expense of individual time and investment in recruiting additional faculty.

Connecticut↗
PubMed2006

Structure of surgical critical care and trauma fellowships.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical critical care (SCC) and trauma fellowships have developed in a variety of formats. Although SCC fellowships must meet specific requirements for accreditation by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, trauma fellowships do not. As the American Board of Surgery is considering combining SCC, trauma, and emergency surgery into "acute care surgery" fellowship training, a better understanding of current program structures is needed. METHODS: The Education Committee of the Surgery Section of the Society of Critical Care Medicine sent surveys by e-mail to all SCC program directors. The survey included questions regarding the content of the fellowship, specifically, subspecialty rotations, trauma content, and operative experience. If they offered a trauma fellowship, the survey queried its structure also. RESULTS: A total of 39 of 82 surveys were returned. About one third of the programs have only SCC fellowships, one third combine SCC/trauma in 1-yr programs, and the remainder combine SCC/trauma in 2 yrs. Of the programs, 79% provided operative experience: 15% on a separate rotation and 39% on call during intensive care unit coverage. About half of the operative experiences were related to trauma and one quarter to emergency general surgery. The great majority of rotations were in general surgical or trauma intensive care units. CONCLUSION: SCC programs already include meaningful trauma and emergency general surgery operative experience. Surgical subspecialty intensive care unit and operative rotations may contribute to optimal training of the "acute care surgeon."

Critical Care↗
PubMed2006

Are resident work-hour limitations beneficial to the trauma profession?

In July 2003, work-hour restrictions were implemented by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to limit resident duty hours. Attending surgeon work-hours have not been similarly reduced, and many trauma services have added emergency general surgery responsibilities. We hypothesized that trauma attending/resident work-hour disparity may disincentivize residents from selecting trauma careers and that trauma directors would view ACGME regulations negatively. We conducted a 6-month study of resident and in-house trauma attending self-reported hours at a level I trauma center and sent a questionnaire to 172 national level I trauma directors (TDs) regarding work-hours restrictions. TD survey response rate was 48 per cent; 100 per cent of 15 residents and 6 trauma faculty completed work-hour logs. Attending mean hours (87.1/ wk), monthly calls (5), and shifts > 30 hours exceeded that of all resident groups. Case volume was similar. Residents viewed their lifestyle more favorably than the lifestyle of the trauma attending (Likert score 3.6 +/- 0.5 vs Likert score 2.5 +/- 0.8, P = 0.0003). Seventy-one per cent cited attending work hours and lifestyle as a reason not to pursue a trauma career. Nationally, 80 per cent of trauma surgeons cover emergency general surgery; 40 per cent work greater than 80 hours weekly, compared with < 1 per cent of surgical trainees (P < 0.0001). Most TDs feel that residents do not spend more time reading (89%) or operating (96%); 68 per cent feel patient care has suffered as a result of duty-hours restrictions. Seventy-one per cent feel residents will not select trauma surgery as a career as a result of changes in duty hours. Perceived trauma attending/ resident work-hour disparity may disincentive trainees from trauma career selection. TDs view resident duty-hour restrictions negatively.

Follow-Up Studies↗