PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Endoscopes”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Transparent endoscopic sheath and rigid-rod endoscope used in endoscopic third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus in the presence of deformed ventricular anatomy.

OBJECT: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has been widely performed for the treatment of noncommunicating hydrocephalus. In cases of hydrocephalus in conjunction with deformed and complex ventricular anatomy, it is preferable to use a rigid-rod endoscope for ETV, because the excellent visibility provided by this instrument yields a smooth and correct orientation in the ventricle. The authors report on ETV procedures in which they used a transparent endoscopic sheath that has a common channel in which a rigid-rod endoscope and an instrument can be inserted. METHODS: In 15 cases of noncommunicating hydrocephalus, a transparent endoscopic sheath and a rigid endoscope were used for ETV. In 11 of the 15 patients, the diameter of the foramen of Monro and the width of the third ventricle were greater than 5 mm, and thus a transparent endoscopic sheath and a rigid endoscope could be smoothly introduced through the foramen of Monro and an ETV successfully performed. Four patients had congenital or acquired narrowing of the foramen of Monro and an anatomically deformed ventricular system. In three of the patients, opening of the narrowed foramen and an ETV were successfully performed using the transparent endoscopic sheath under direct visualization through the rigid-rod endoscope. CONCLUSIONS: A transparent endoscopic sheath increases safety by offering a corridor to the third ventricle. It also provides excellent visibility without troublesome bleeding from tissues surrounding the foramen of Monro during endoscopic procedures in which a rigid endoscope is used.

Adolescent↗

[Endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer: from Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) to Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)].

Surgery has been the traditional treatment for early gastric cancer, but it is known that the endoscopic treatment offers the same results with a lower mortality rate. The first endoscopic therapy used was the polypectomy in cases of pediculate tumors. However, in depressed or flat tumors, tissue-destructive methods are used together with sclerosant substances, laser or plasma argon; their disadvantage is that the procedure cannot be properly evaluated since the tissue is destroyed. On the other hand, the Endoscopic Mucous Resection (EMR) techniques, such as strip biopsy, the injecting and cutting technique, the transparent capsule or the varices ligation, does permit the evaluation of the results of the endoscopic treatment. Progresses in EMR are due to the use of the chromoscopy and the submucous injection of various substances (normal and hypertonic saline solution, hyaluronic acid, etc.). The problem of the EMR is local relapse, attributed to the resection in lesions fragments of more than 10 mm. To resolve this problem, the Endoscopic Submucous Dissection (ESD) has been developed, using the endoscopic scalpel or its modifications; such as the endoscopic scalpel with the isolated point (IT-Knife). The last ones require more operating time, better skills and have more complications. The efforts to make a better diagnosis and treatment of these lesions continue day by day, by using the magnification endoscopes, the endoscopes with multiple inflexions, etc.

Digestive System Surgical Procedures↗

The endoscopic transilluminator: an endoscopic device for identification of the proximal jejunum for transgastric endoscopic gastrojejunostomy.

BACKGROUND: Localization of the proximal jejunum is important for creation of gastrojejunal anastomosis to palliate gastric outlet obstruction or for treatment of obesity with gastric bypass. OBJECTIVE: To facilitate identification of the proximal jejunum during transgastric endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with the use of an endoscopic transilluminator (ET). DESIGN AND SETTING: Acute experiments in a live porcine model. INTERVENTIONS: The ET is a 3500-mm long, 6F radio-opaque tube with a fiberoptic core that lights up at its distal end. When situated in the intestinal lumen, it transilluminates the bowel wall. With the animal under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, a colonoscope was advanced to the proximal jejunum. A plastic tube (3500-mm long, 3.5 mm in diameter) was passed through the biopsy channel and placed into the small bowel. The colonoscope was withdrawn, leaving the tube in place. The ET was introduced into the jejunum through the tube. A gastric wall incision was made and the endoscope was advanced to the peritoneal cavity. The transilluminated loop of the proximal jejunum was identified and gastrojejunal anastomosis was made by use of a previously reported endoscopic technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Identification of the proximal jejunum. RESULTS: Eleven pigs (average weight 55 kg) had ET placement. In all of the pigs, placement of the ET was performed easily to the proximal small bowel, and the proximal jejunum was successfully localized by either direct visualization of the transilluminated loop only or with the aid of fluoroscopy. The tip of the ET was usually located about 50 to 70 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz. There were no complications related to the use of ET. LIMITATIONS: The device has not yet been evaluated in humans. CONCLUSIONS: The ET is a safe instrument and can be used to identify the proximal jejunum to facilitate endoscopic gastrojejunostomy.

Animals↗

Novel endoscopic therapies for gastrointestinal malignancies: endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic ablation.

Gastrointestinal malignancies are often detected at advanced stages when the prognosis is poor. Screening guidelines that vary accord-ing to the regional disease prevalence are needed. High-resolution endoscopy, magnification endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, light autofluorescence endoscopy, and optical coherence tomography are new technologies designed to improve endoscopic detection. Once detected, lesions must be accurately staged, including depth of mucosal penetration and lymph node involvement, to determine endoscopic resectability. Widely applicable, relatively safe, and minimally invasive alternatives to surgery are needed. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic ablation are potentially curative for malignancies limited to the mucosa, obviating the need for surgery in these patients.

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal↗

Endoscopic variceal ligation versus endoscopic variceal ligation and endoscopic sclerotherapy: a prospective randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) with a combination of EVL and endoscopic scelerotherapy (EST) in the secondary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding. METHODS: Fifty patients with esophageal varices due to cirrhosis of the liver (38), noncirrhotic portal fibrosis (7), or extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (5) were included in the study. These 50 patients were randomized to receive either EVL alone or a combination of EVL and EST for variceal eradication. Twenty-one patients received EVL alone (group A), and 23 patients received EVL and EST (group B). In group B, EVLs were performed until the varices were reduced to grade II size, and, subsequently, these patients underwent low-dose sclerotherapy with 1% polidocanol until variceal eradication was achieved. RESULTS: Combined EVL and EST treatment eradicated the varices in a significantly greater number of patients then EVL alone (87% vs. 24%; p < 0.05). However, significantly more endoscopic sessions were required with combined treatment than with EVL alone (5.87 +/- 2.32 vs. 4.28 +/- 1.82; p < 0.05). Rebleeding episodes before variceal eradication were similar in the two groups (19% vs. 22%). The complications were similar in both the EVL and the EVL-plus-EST group, ie., deep ulcers (16% vs. 20%), transient dysphagia (20% vs. 32%), and stricture (4% vs. 8%). CONCLUSION: Thus, combined EVL and EST treatment eradicates varices in a significantly larger number of patients than EVL alone, with no extra complications.

Adult↗

Inconsistencies in endoscope-reprocessing and infection-control guidelines: the importance of endoscope drying.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscope reprocessing is a multi-stepped process that renders a contaminated endoscope safe for reuse. Its steps include meticulous cleaning, complete immersion in a liquid chemical sterilant (LCS) or disinfectant to achieve high-level disinfection (or "liquid sterilization"), water rinsing, and proper handling and storage. Surveys and reports indicate that not all health-care facilities dry their endoscopes after reprocessing. Endoscope drying can be easily, quickly, and inexpensively achieved by flushing the endoscope's internal channels, and wiping its external surfaces, with 70-90% ethyl or isopropyl alcohol, to facilitate drying after reprocessing, followed by compressed or forced air. METHODS: The medical literature was reviewed to evaluate the importance of endoscope drying to the prevention of disease transmission. Several national and international endoscope-reprocessing and infection-control guidelines and a public health advisory were also reviewed and compared for consistency and to evaluate the emphasis each places on endoscope drying. If a guideline recommends endoscope drying, this study clarified whether this step is recommended after reprocessing throughout the day (i.e., between patient procedures), before storage, or both. These guidelines were also reviewed to determine whether any of them recommend reprocessing endoscopes before the first patient of the day. RESULTS: This review identified several published reports and clinical studies that demonstrate the significant contribution of endoscope drying to the prevention of disease transmission. This review also identified significant differences and inconsistencies regarding the emphasis different published guidelines and a public health advisory place on endoscope drying. Some guidelines recommend drying the endoscope after completion of every reprocessing cycle, both throughout the day and before storage, while others deemphasize its importance and recommend endoscope drying only before storage, if at all. Instead of recommending endoscope drying before storage, some guidelines recommend reprocessing endoscopes before the first patient of the day. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The finding that several guidelines are inconsistent with one another and that some are remiss and fail to recommend endoscope drying is of concern. Endoscope drying is as important to the prevention of nosocomial infection as cleaning and high-level disinfection (or "liquid sterilization"). Whereas wet or inadequately dried endoscopes pose an increased risk of contamination and have been associated with transmission of waterborne microorganisms and nosocomial infection, thoroughly dried (and properly cleaned and high-level disinfected) endoscopes have not been linked to nosocomial infection. Moreover, inconsistent guidelines can confuse reprocessing staff members and result in noncompliance, variations in the standard of care, and ineffective reprocessing. To minimize the risk of disease transmission and nosocomial infection, modification and revision of guidelines are recommended as required to be consistent with one another and to unconditionally recommend endoscope drying after completion of every reprocessing cycle, both between patient procedures and before storage, no matter the label claim of the LCS or disinfectant, the label claim of the automated reprocessing system, or the microbial quality of the rinse water. According to the medical literature, adoption of this recommendation may reduce the importance of not only monitoring the microbial quality of the rinse water, but also reprocessing endoscopes before the first patient of the day, both of which can be costly practices that a few guidelines recommend.

Cross Infection↗

[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and lithiasis of the common bile duct: prospective study on the importance of preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography].

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment of symptomatic gallstones. At present, no consensus has been reached on the diagnostic and therapeutic methods of concomitant common bile duct stones. Systematic preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography followed, if necessary, by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy during the same anesthetic procedure could be a diagnostic and therapeutic alternative for common bile duct stones making possible a laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative investigation of the common bile duct. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five patients underwent a prospective endoscopic ultrasonographic evaluation prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. Fourty-four patients (35%) had at least one predictive factor for common bile duct stones. Endoscopic ultrasonography and cholecystectomy were performed on the same day. Endoscopic ultrasonography was followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy by the same endoscopist in case of common bile duct stones on endoscopic ultrasonography. Patients were routinely followed up between 3 and 6 months and one year after cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Endoscopic ultrasonography suggested common bile duct stones in 21 patients (17%). Endoscopic ultrasonography identified a stone in 17 of 44 patients (38.6%) with predictor of common bile duct stones and only in 4 of 81 patients (4.9%) without predictor of common bile duct stone. Among these 21 patients, one patient was not investigated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography because of the high risk of sphincterotomy, 19 patients had a stone removed after sphincterotomy, one patient had no visible stone neither on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, nor on exploration of the common bile duct after sphincterotomy. Endoscopic ultrasonography was normal in 104 patients (83%). However, two patients in this group were investigated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography because endoscopic ultrasonography was incomplete in one case and because endoscopic ultrasonography was normal in the second case but a stone in the left hepatic duct was detected by ultrasonography. A stone was removed after endoscopic sphincterotomy in these two patients. In the group of 102 patients without stone, 91 out of 92, continued to be asymptomatic during a median follow-up of 8.5 months. One patient with symptoms one month after cholecystectomy underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy but no stone was found. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography followed, if necessary with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy is a diagnostic and therapeutic alternative for common bile duct stones making possible a laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative investigation of the common bile duct for all patients. This alternative is only justifiable in patients with predictor of common bile duct stones.

Adult↗

Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones: A prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation may be an alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of bile duct stones. However, there is a controversy as to the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-two patients with bile duct stones were enrolled and randomized to an endoscopic sphincterotomy or endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation group. The success rate for duct clearance as well as the frequency and types of complications were evaluated prospectively. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in a standard manner. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation was carried out with gradual inflation of a 4-, 6-, or 8-mm diameter balloon. RESULTS: Complete duct clearance was achieved in 100% in the endoscopic sphincterotomy group and 99.3% in the endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation group (not significant). Complications occurred in 11.8% of patients in the endoscopic sphincterotomy group and 14.5% of those in the endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation group (not significant). No complication was severe; there was no mortality. The frequency of acute pancreatitis was higher in the endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation group than the endoscopic sphincterotomy group (respectively, 10.9% vs. 2.8%; p < 0.045). Hemorrhage occurred only in the endoscopic sphincterotomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation were approximately equal in terms of successful clearance of bile duct stones. They were also similar with respect to overall complications. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation is an alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy as a treatment of bile duct stones.

Adult↗

Endoscope-assisted microneurosurgery for anterior circulation aneurysms using the angle-type rigid endoscope over a 3-year period.

INTRODUCTION: The use of the endoscope (fiberscope) to assist the microsurgical clipping of cerebral aneurysm was first reported by Fischer and Mustafa in 1994. The rigid endoscope has been increasingly used during aneurysm surgery in which structures around the aneurysm can be detected with high quality imaging. Our 3 years of its use now allows us to assess the endoscope's efficacy and limits in standard surgery with a pterional approach in aneurysms of the anterior circulation. The endoscope can carry out a supportive role in planning surgical manoeuvres and in verifying whether clipping has been performed correctly or not. In our view, among the aneurysms of the anterior circulation, the endoscope is particularly useful in those of the internal carotid and the anterior communicating arteries. In many cases of these aneurysms the posterior communicating artery, choroidal artery or one of the distal cerebral arteries is hidden behind the aneurysm dome. Dome retraction is often required in order to see these vascular structures with the microscope. Thus an endoscope with a 30 degrees view angle becomes very useful. The concealed areas are identified without retraction, which prevents the possibility of the aneurysm being ruptured and also reduces the use of temporary clipping. From its early use as a supportive measure that is sometimes useful in surgery for "easy" aneurysms, the endoscope has now become almost indispensable for the "difficult" aneurysms, including the large and giant ones before and after clipping. Thus, the endoscope should be kept ready for use in the operating theatre for any eventuality. OBJECTIVE: We assess the advantages and disadvantages of the use of the endoscope in the microsurgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: During our 3 years of experience, 52 patients with 48 ruptured and 10 unruptured aneurysms of the anterior circulation (including 6 cases of two-fold aneurysms) underwent clipping with endoscope support through a pterional approach. All ruptured aneurysms produced a Hunt and Hess Grade I or II subarachnoid haemorrhage. The endoscope was inserted before and after clipping in order to observe the conditions surrounding the aneurysm and to receive immediate confirmation that clipping had been performed correctly. RESULTS: In all cases general anatomy visualization was provided by the endoscope, and the correct clip positioning and vessel conditions were easily checked. In 4 cases the endoscope showed that the clip had been positioned incorrectly. Additional clipping was performed in these cases: in 2 cases the clip was re-applied correctly and in another case a clip was added. Only the fourth patient with a large communicating artery died (1.9%) of cerebral infarction. This was due to post-clipping stenosis of one distal cerebral artery in which it was not possible to re-position the clip correctly because of the presence of arteriosclerotic calcific plaque near the aneurysm neck. In 3 cases there was an intraoperative ruptured aneurysm dome that was not caused by the endoscope insertion. No further complications were caused by the endoscope. CONCLUSION: In certain cases endoscopic-assisted microsurgery is an exceptional aid to the surgeon and must become part of the operating theatre equipment and kept on hand ready for use. The endoscope is, in our opinion, particularly useful in certain aneurysm localisations (internal carotid artery-anterior communicating artery [ICA-ACOMA]).

Adult↗

Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the management of rectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: There is scant data about the clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in rectal carcinoma. This study was designed to determine the impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration on the staging and management of rectal carcinoma and to compare the staging accuracy of computed tomography scan, endoscopic ultrasound, and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. METHODS: The records of 60 consecutive patients diagnosed with rectal carcinoma referred for endoscopic ultrasound staging were reviewed. Computed tomography scans, endoscopic ultrasound imaging, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration staging, surgical pathology, and subsequent treatment were compared. RESULTS: Of 48 patients who underwent computed tomography scan imaging, the additional information provided by endoscopic ultrasound changed management in 38 percent of patients. Sixteen patients identified as having nonjuxtatumoral lymph nodes underwent fine-needle aspiration and the additional information obtained changed therapy in three (19 percent) of these patients. All five cases of recurrent rectal carcinoma were correctly diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration. Tumor staging accuracy was 45 percent (computed tomography) and 89 percent (endoscopic ultrasound; P<0.0001); nodal staging accuracy was 68 percent (computed tomography), 85 percent (endoscopic ultrasound), and 92 percent (endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration; P=not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic ultrasound imaging was better than computed tomography scanning at overall tumor staging, whereas endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration demonstrated a trend toward more accurate nodal staging. Preoperative staging with endoscopic ultrasound resulted in a change of management in 38 percent of patients. The addition of fine-needle aspiration changed the management in 19 percent of those who underwent nonjuxtatumoral lymph node sampling. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration accurately diagnosed 100 percent of those with recurrent rectal carcinoma. Clearly, endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration are important for the staging and management of rectal carcinoma and for detecting disease recurrence.

Biopsy, Fine-Needle↗

Comparison of endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy with sequential endoscopic band ligation plus low-dose sclerotherapy for secondary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy and band ligation both have certain limitations such as, respectively, esophageal complications and early recurrence of varices. METHODS: From February 1994 to March 1996, all consecutive patients with portal hypertension due to either cirrhosis or noncirrhotic portal fibrosis and a history of variceal bleeding were included in a prospective study and randomly assigned to receive either endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy alone or endoscopic variceal band ligation plus low-dose endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy. RESULTS: Of 69 patients, 34 were randomly assigned to receive endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy alone; 35 received endoscopic variceal band ligation plus endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy. Complete variceal eradication rates (85% vs. 80%) and the number of endoscopic sessions required for eradication (6.61 +/- 2.94 vs. 7.85 +/- 3.31) were similar in the endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy and endoscopic variceal band ligation plus endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy groups, respectively. The mean volume of sclerosant required in the combined group (54.94 +/- 33.74 mL) was significantly less than that in the endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy group (81.91 +/- 34.80 mL). The complication and recurrent bleeding rates were significantly higher in the endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy group than those in the combined group (20% and 16% vs. 3% and 3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy and endoscopic variceal band ligation plus endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy were comparable in eradicating varices but the combined technique was associated with significantly lower complication and recurrent bleeding rates.

Adult↗

Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy vs. endoscopic variceal ligation in arresting acute variceal bleeding for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and acute esophageal variceal bleeding have a very poor prognosis. To compare the efficacy and complications of sclerotherapy and banding ligation, patients with acute esophageal variceal bleeding and concomitant hepatocellular carcinoma were randomly allocated to receive either sclerotherapy (endoscopic injection sclerotherapy group, 27 patients) or banding ligation (endoscopic variceal ligation group, 30 patients). All patients received treatment within 24 h of index bleeding. Initial control of bleeding was achieved in 41% of the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy group and 87% of the endoscopic variceal ligation group (p < 0.001). The re-bleeding rates were 73% and 42%, respectively (p < 0.05). The amount of blood transfused during the week after treatment was significantly higher in the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy than in the endoscopic variceal ligation group (3.9 +/- 1.5 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.8 units, respectively) (p < 0.01). Major complications were more often encountered in the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy group (22%) than in the endoscopic variceal ligation group (3%) (p < 0.05). Twenty-three patients in the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy group and 25 patients in the endoscopic variceal ligation group have so far died. The mean survival was 25 +/- 16 days in the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy group and 49 +/- 14 days in the endoscopic variceal ligation group (p < 0.05). Variceal bleeding was the main cause of mortality in the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy group (70%), whereas in the endoscopic variceal ligation group, hepatic failure (48%), rather than variceal bleeding (28%), was the major cause.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute Disease↗

Endoscopic and endoscopic-assisted surgery for juvenile angiofibroma.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The mainstay treatment for juvenile angiofibromas is surgery. Endoscopic techniques have been applied to the resection of juvenile angiofibromas. The aim of the study is to establish the efficacy of endoscopic and endoscopic-assisted techniques for the removal of juvenile angiofibromas. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: Retrospective review was made of all patients with juvenile angiofibromas who were treated with endoscopic and endoscopic-assisted surgery from January 1994 to July 1999. RESULTS: Fifteen tumors in 13 patients were removed using endoscopic or endoscopic-assisted surgeries. In 11 patients, endoscopic surgery or endoscopic-assisted surgery (or both) was successful and the patients remained without evidence of disease at a median follow-up of 34 months. In two patients tumor persisted, which was detected during routine follow-up less than 6 months after the initial surgery. These tumors were managed with a second endoscopic or endoscopic-assisted surgery, and patients remained without evidence of disease. We encountered one postoperative complication, a progressive optic neuropathy that was successfully managed with endoscopic decompression. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic and endoscopic-assisted surgery is a feasible alternative or adjunct to traditional techniques.

Adolescent↗

Video-endoscope versus endoscope for paranasal sinus surgery: influence on stereoacuity.

A matter of debate is whether the use of a video-endoscope impairs visual orientation and manual precision in endonasal surgery. We investigated the influence of video-endoscopy compared to endoscopy on stereoacuity in a model of the nasal cavity. Twenty medical staff members were asked to touch defined points in a spatial model of the nasal cavity as quickly as possible and in correct order using 0 degree and 30 degrees endoscopes, looking directly through the endoscope or looking at a video monitor connected to a CCD camera on the endoscope. Time, number of omissions of points and faults in point sequence were recorded. Manipulations were significantly quicker when the "operative field" was seen directly through the endoscope compared to orientation from the monitor for both 0 degree endoscope 96 +/- 4.7 s. vs. 108 +/- 5.6 s. and 30 degrees endoscope 84 +/- 3.9 s. vs. 96 +/- 5.5 s. (+/- SEM). There was no difference in number of omissions and faults in sequence between "endoscope" and "video-endoscope." The fact that the use of a video-endoscope did not increase the number of faults in our experiment does not support the notion that performing endoscopic sinus surgery using a monitor is unsafe. In the hands of the participants who were experienced with the endoscope, however, the use of a video-endoscope slowed down manipulations to a significant degree. To which extent this may be due to the effect of training or to superiority of the endoscope per se will remain a matter of discussion until a group of experienced video-endoscopists will have repeated the study.

Endoscopy↗

Endoscopic sphincterotomy vs. endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for choledocholithiasis in patients with liver cirrhosis and coagulopathy.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether endoscopic papillary balloon dilation decreases the risk of hemorrhage without increasing the risk of acute pancreatitis, the results of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation were compared with those of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy in patients with cirrhosis and coagulopathy. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with liver cirrhosis with coagulopathy had endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for choledocholithiasis from January 2001 to September 2003. Twenty patients with cirrhosis and coagulopathy who underwent endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy from January 1998 to December 2000, served as a historical control group. RESULTS: The rate of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy related hemorrhage was 30% (6/20), whereas the rate for endoscopic papillary balloon dilation related hemorrhage was 0% (p=0.009). With regard to rates of hemorrhage in relation to Child-Pugh class, most (n=5) of the bleeding complications occurred in patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis; bleeding occurred in only one patient with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis. There was no significant difference between the endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy and the endoscopic papillary balloon dilation groups for procedure-related pancreatitis (10% vs. 4.7%, respectively; p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation may significantly reduce the risk of bleeding compared with endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy in patients with advanced cirrhosis and coagulopathy. In these patients, the substitution of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy is recommended for treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Adult↗

Deficiencies of automatic endoscopic reprocessors: a method to achieve high-grade disinfection of endoscopes.

BACKGROUND: We show that disinfection using the automatic endoscopic reprocessor is not complete and propose a method for high-grade disinfection of endoscopes. METHODS: We used an automatic endoscopic reprocessor, Pyser System 83, and 2% glutaraldehyde. After each endoscopic procedure, the endoscopes were divided into three groups. Endoscopes in group A were washed only by the reprocessor. Group B endoscopes were washed by the reprocessor after the connectors were soaked in glutaraldehyde for 5 minutes. The channels, valves, connecting sections of group C endoscopes, and the connectors of the machine were sprayed with glutaraldehyde before machine-washing. Swabs were taken from all 13 parts of each endoscope and machine for microbiologic culture. RESULTS: Six endoscopes were positive, cumulatively, for bacterial contamination in group A. Among group B endoscopes, one remained contaminated. No endoscope was positive in group C. The difference between group A and C was statistically significant (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Machine washing by automatic endoscopic reprocessors may not achieve complete disinfection. Additional procedures are necessary. High-grade disinfection of the connectors is critical. Disinfection of the interface between the connectors is important.

Disinfection↗

[Endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography performed during the same anesthesia session].

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility, results and importance of a diagnostic and therapeutic biliary and pancreatic exploration associating endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography during the same anaesthesia session. METHODS: From November 1997 to October 1998, 179 patients (83 males, 96 females), mean age 62 years (range 22 to 95 years), were investigated in our gastroenterology unit for biliary or pancreatic disorders. Two hundred and sixty two examinations were performed by a single physician for patients under general anaesthesia. In 87 cases (42%), endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography was performed immediately without prior endoscopic ultrasonography; these patients were not included. When endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography followed endoscopic ultrasonography, it was performed during the same anaesthesia session. RESULTS: In 118 cases, endoscopic ultrasonography was performed first, followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography 57 times (48%). The sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasonography was 96.5% and the success of therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography was 100%. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography was necessary for 83% of patients with angiocholitis, 60% with cholestasis, 45% with acute biliary pancreatitis and only 28% with common bile duct stone migration. CONCLUSION: To decrease the number of anaesthesia sessions, endoscopic ultrasonography--endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography during same anaesthesia session appears to be particularly interesting for the diagnosis and treatment of biliary and pancreatic disorders, in terms of cost, accuracy, morbidity and patient comfort.

Adult↗