PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

The GASTER project: building a computer network in digestive endoscopy: the experience of the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Application for Standards in Telecommunication, Education and Research.

Digestive endoscopy is currently the main diagnostic procedure for investigation of the digestive tract whenever a digestive disease is suspected. From 1970 to 1985, digestive endoscopy was performed with endoscopes equipped with fiberoptic bundles, whereas the last decade was marked by the development of electronic endoscopes, characterized by the presence of a CCD (charge coupled device) at the tip of the endoscope. Thus the physician looks at a TV screen to control the procedure and examine in detail the gut wall. Endoscopes examine the foregut until the duodenum and the hindgut, up to the three last intestinal loops. When the endoscopic workstation comprises a computer, it is possible to acquire electronic images during the endoscopy and use these images as support of the information about the results of the procedure. These numeric images can then be stored in databases containing text attached to them. Starting with these images, one may expect many developments in the near future that will change the management of the patient with digestive diseases. Physicians will become able to exchange images and text related to one patient or one procedure, although they are equipped with different workstations. Therefore, it is obvious that the information exchanged must be written in a standard format that makes it understandable by all systems. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a scientific society that groups most of the gastroenterologists in Europe. This society has initiated a research program to develop standards for the exchange of images and text. The Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Applications for Standards in Telecommunication, Education, and Research (GASTER) project intends to implement a multimedia database of endoscopic images based on a standard format of images and a standard terminology for descriptive terms. These standards must be validated by use in different endoscopy units. The database will collect images from these centers that will be linked to the coordinating center through a network based on an integrated services digital network (fast electronic connection). This database will then be used for the development of computer applications. The output of the GASTER project will bring advances at three levels: (1) The physicians will be able to exchange images about the procedures their patients have undergone and will thus obtain more complete information, improving quality of care. They will also benefit from help-to-decision applications based on validated reference images from the database. (2) At the patient level, the quality of care will be improved through a better dissemination of information between the physicians in charge of the patient, thus there is better follow-up of the patient and a decrease in redundant examinations. (3) At the level of national health care systems, the benefit will be a decrease in cost of care due to a better follow-up of the patients, a decrease in redundant examinations, and a faster decision made to treat the patient. The possibility of consulting a database of a scientifically validated images used as reference material will also improve quality control in digestive endoscopy.

Computer Communication Networks↗
PubMed2000

Preventing nosocomial infections from gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Gastrointestinal procedures have been associated with a wide range of infectious complications, including bacterial endocarditis. Although the rate of bacteremia from the patient's own flora is quite high after some procedures, only a few cases of endocarditis caused by gastrointestinal instrumentation have been reported. Because of the severity of the illness, however, antibiotic prophylaxis has been recommended for patients who are categorized as high risk for some procedures. Bacteremia and other infections, such as colitis, may also originate from a contaminated endoscope. To prevent such an occurrence, high-level disinfection has been recommended for gastrointestinal endoscopes. High-level disinfection includes manual cleaning of the endoscope, flushing of internal channels with a liquid chemical sterilant, and thorough rinsing and drying of internal lumens.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗
PubMed1998

Guidelines of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (E.S.G.E.) antibiotic prophylaxis for gastrointestinal endoscopy. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

There are two situations when antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended. The first is associated with procedures known to be followed by high rates of bacteraemia, involving organisms prone to cause endocarditis. These include oesophageal dilatation, variceal sclerotherapy and laser therapy in the upper gastrointestinal tract. As bacteraemia following these procedures is usually harmless in average risk patients antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended only for a patient with a lesion susceptible to endocarditis or one who is at increased risk of symptomatic bacteraemia due to neutropenia or immunosuppression. In most cases parenteral amoxycillin and gentamicin is recommended plus metronidazole for neutropenic patients. Vancomycin or teicoplanin replace amoxycillin in a case of allergy. The second situation concerns procedures with a high incidence of local infection or which may lead to serious sepsis. These include therapeutic retrograde cholangiopancratography and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy where antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended even in average risk patients. Several antibiotics are recommended including oral ciprofloxacin or parenteral gentamicin or quinolone for ERCP and amoxycillin for PEG or cephalosporin or ureidopenicillin for both.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Antibiotic prophylaxis for gastrointestinal endoscopy. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

This is one of a series of statements discussing the practice of gastrointestinal endoscopy in common clinical situations. It is intended to aid endoscopists in determining the appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. Guidelines for the appropriate practice of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus. Controlled clinical studies are needed to clarify aspects of this statement, and revision may be necessary as new data appear. Clinical consideration may justify a course of action at variance from these recommendations. Recommendations on prophylaxis against infective endocarditis were developed in conjunction with the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis and Kawasaki Disease of the Council of Cardiovascular Disease in the Young of the American Heart Association.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗
PubMed2000

The clinical significance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in gastrointestinal vasculitis related to scrub typhus.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Scrub typhus is an acute febrile illness caused by Rickettsia tsutsugamushi-induced vasculitis, which is common in Asia and the Pacific islands and is sometimes encountered in Western countries because of increased travel and economic changes spurred by world globalization. Skin rash and eschar are typical physical findings on the trunk and extremities, but endoscopic mucosal changes have not been described in the gastrointestinal tract until now. We aimed to describe different endoscopic characteristics of the gastrointestinal manifestation of scrub typhus, to ascertain the necessity for endoscopy, and to determine correlations between the degrees of endoscopic lesion and clinical severity, including cutaneous manifestation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1993 and October 1998, out of 256 scrub typhus patients, we applied esophagogastroduodenoscopy to 58 patients who complained of gastrointestinal symptoms but had no past history of these symptoms. We categorized clinical severity into four grades according to the degree of six clinical indicators of systemic complications, and endoscopic findings were graded from I to IV (I, normal, nonspecific hyperemia; II, distinct hyperemia, petechiae, purpura; II, superficial hemorrhage, erosion; IV, ulcer, active bleeding). RESULTS: Endoscopic findings of scrub typhus were characterized by petechiae, superficial hemorrhage, erosion, ulcers, and vascular bleeding (grade I, 14 patients; grade II, 11 patients; grade III, 16 patients; grade IV, 17 patients). In 83.3% of patients there was multiple occurrence of lesions without any predilection sites. Clinical severity was graded (grade I, 7 patients; grade II, 23 patients; grade III, 22 patients; grade IV, 6 patients). There was a correlation between clinical severity and endoscopic findings (P < 0.01). The grade of lesion was high in patients with cutaneous lesions (r(s) 0.359, P < 0.01). In two cases of gastric vascular bleeding, complete hemostasis was achieved by endoscopic hemoclipping. CONCLUSIONS: The major endoscopic features that can develop in scrub typhus are superficial mucosal hemorrhage, multiple erosions and ulcers without any predilection sites, and unusual vascular bleeding. The endoscopic features are related to cutaneous lesions and severity of the disease. Endoscopy is useful for diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal vasculitis related to scrub typhus.

Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal↗
PubMed2006

Use of sedation for routine diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey of National Endoscopy Society Members.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Sedation rates may vary among countries, depending on patients' and endoscopists' preferences. The aim of this survey was to investigate the rate of using premedication for routine diagnostic upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy in endoscopy societies, members of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). METHODS: We evaluated a multiple-choice questionnaire which was e-mailed to representatives of national endoscopy societies, which are members of the ESGE. The questionnaire had 14 items referring to endoscopy practices in each country and the representatives' endoscopy units. RESULTS: The response rate was 76% (34/45). In 47% of the countries, less than 25% of patients undergo routine diagnostic UGI endoscopy with conscious sedation. In 62% of the responders' endoscopy units, patients are not asked their preference for sedation and do not sign a consent form (59%). Common sedatives in use are midazolam (82%), diazepam (38%) or propofol (47%). Monitoring equipment is not available 'in most of the endoscopy units' in 46% (13/28) of the countries. Though they were available in 91% of the national representatives' endoscopy units, they are rarely (21%) used to monitor unsedated routine diagnostic UGI endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: In about 50% of ESGE-related countries, less than 25% of patients are sedated for routine diagnostic UGI endoscopy. Major issues to improve include availability of monitoring equipment and the use of a consent form.

Procedural Sedation↗