PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Enoxaparin”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1994

Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin to prevent deep venous thrombosis after hip replacement surgery. Enoxaparin Clinical Trial Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most effective and safe dose of enoxaparin to prevent deep venous thrombosis in high-risk surgical patients. DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial. SETTING: Private, university, and government hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: 572 patients having elective hip replacement surgery, 568 of whom received study medication and had efficacy data available for evaluation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to one of three subcutaneous enoxaparin regimens: 10 mg once daily (161 patients); 40 mg once daily (199 patients); and 30 mg every 12 hours (208 patients). Treatment was initiated within 24 hours after surgery and continued for as long as 7 days. Treatment with 10 mg enoxaparin once daily was discontinued prematurely after an interim analysis showed an increased deep venous thrombosis incidence in this treatment group. MEASUREMENTS: Efficacy was determined by bilateral lower extremity venography, noninvasive vascular imaging methods, or clinical evidence on day 7 of treatment or earlier if clinically indicated. RESULTS: Deep venous thrombosis occurred in 25% (40 of 161) of the patients who received 10 mg of enoxaparin once daily; in 14% (27 of 199) of those receiving 40 mg of enoxaparin once daily; and in 11% (22 of 208) in those receiving 30 mg of enoxaparin every 12 hours. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis was significantly higher in patients who received 10 mg of enoxaparin once daily compared with those who received 40 mg of enoxaparin once daily (P = 0.02) or those who received 30 mg of enoxaparin every 12 hours (P < 0.001). The difference between the patients who received 40 mg once daily and those who received 30 mg every 12 hours was not significant. Only two cases of pulmonary embolism were diagnosed, one in patients receiving 40 mg of enoxaparin and one in those receiving 10 mg once daily. The incidence of hemorrhagic complications differed significantly between patients who received 10 mg of enoxaparin once daily (5%, 8 of 161 patients) and those who received 30 mg of enoxaparin every 12 hours (13%, 26 of 208; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: After surgery, enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily or 30 mg every 12 hours, is more effective than a regimen of 10 mg once daily to prevent deep venous thrombosis in patients having elective hip replacement surgery. The regimens of 40 mg once daily and 30 mg every 12 hours provided prophylaxis similar to the most effective drug treatments previously reported. The incidence of hemorrhagic episodes with the regimens of 40 mg once daily and 30 mg twice daily was higher than that observed with 10 mg once daily; however, major hemorrhage occurred in only 4% to 5% of patients receiving the higher-dose regimens. The risk-to-benefit ratio supports the use of enoxaparin as a therapeutic agent to prevent deep venous thrombosis in these patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement. Enoxaparin Clinical Trial Group.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing hip or knee joint replacement are at risk for venous thromboembolic complications for up to twelve weeks postoperatively. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a prolonged post-hospital regimen of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, in this patient population. METHODS: Following elective total hip or knee replacement, 968 patients received subcutaneous enoxaparin (30 mg twice daily) for seven to ten days, and 873 were then randomized to receive three weeks of double-blind outpatient treatment with either enoxaparin (40 mg once daily) or a placebo. The primary efficacy end point was the prevalence of objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism or symptomatic pulmonary embolism during the double-blind phase of treatment. RESULTS: Of the 873 randomized patients, 435 underwent elective total hip replacement and 438 underwent elective total knee replacement. Enoxaparin was superior to the placebo in reducing the prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients treated with hip replacement: 8.0% (eighteen) of the 224 patients treated with enoxaparin had venous thromboembolism compared with 23.2% (forty-nine) of the 211 patients treated with the placebo (p < 0.001; odds ratio, 3.62; 95% confidence interval, 2.00 to 6.55; relative risk reduction, 65.5%). Enoxaparin had no significant benefit in the patients treated with knee replacement: thirty-eight (17.5%) of the 217 patients treated with enoxaparin had venous thromboembolism compared with forty-six (20.8%) of the 221 patients treated with the placebo (p = 0.380; odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.76 to 2.02; relative risk reduction, 15.9%). Symptomatic pulmonary embolism developed in three patients, one with a hip replacement and two with a knee replacement; all had received the placebo. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of hemorrhagic episodes or other types of toxicity between the enoxaparin and placebo-treated groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonging enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis following hip replacement for a total of four weeks provided therapeutic benefit, by reducing the prevalence of venous thromboembolism, without compromising safety. A similar benefit was not observed in patients treated with knee replacement.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Use of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, and unfractionated heparin for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis after elective hip replacement. A clinical trial comparing efficacy and safety. Enoxaparin Clinical Trial Group.

A randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial (the physicians, patients, and staff were not blinded with regard to the regimen that had been used) was conducted, between December 1988 and September 1990, to compare the safety and efficacy of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, with the safety and efficacy of unfractionated heparin for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis after elective hip replacement. Six hundred and ten patients were randomized, and 607 patients received one of the study medications. The evaluations of efficacy included contrast-media venography, non-invasive vascular examination, and clinical examination. Data on efficacy were available for 604 patients, who had been assigned to one of three treatment groups: thirty milligrams of enoxaparin every twelve hours (194 patients), forty milligrams of enoxaparin once daily (203 patients), or 5000 units of unfractionated heparin every eight hours (207 patients). All drugs were administered subcutaneously. Dosages were not adjusted on the basis of the results of coagulation tests or the body weight of the patient. Treatment was initiated within twenty-four hours after the operation and continued for a maximum of seven days. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of bleeding episodes. An intent-to-treat patient analysis revealed that deep venous thrombosis occurred in nine (5 per cent) of the 194 patients who received thirty milligrams of enoxaparin every twelve hours, thirty (15 per cent) of the 203 patients who received forty milligrams of enoxaparin once daily, and twenty-four (12 per cent) of the 207 patients who received unfractionated heparin. The rate of deep venous thrombosis was significantly lower in the group that received thirty milligrams of enoxaparin every twelve hours than in the group that received unfractionated heparin (p = 0.03) and in the group that received forty milligrams of enoxaparin once daily (p = 0.0002). No clinically symptomatic pulmonary embolism was observed during the treatment or follow-up phase of this study in the group that received thirty milligrams of enoxaparin every twelve hours. Analysis of evaluable patients revealed a marked reduction in the rate of deep venous thrombosis in the group that received thirty milligrams of enoxaparin every twelve hours (eight [6 per cent] of 136 patients) compared with the group that received heparin (twenty-one [15 per cent] of 145 patients) (p = 0.10); however, this difference was not significant because of the small number of patients included in this analysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Safety of concomitant therapy with eptifibatide and enoxaparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Coronary Revascularization Using Integrilin and Single bolus Enoxaparin Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess whether use of enoxaparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) increased bleeding compared with unfractionated heparin, in addition to background therapy with eptifibatide. BACKGROUND: Data supporting the benefits of enoxaparin and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide evolved in parallel. Information on combining these two classes of medications is limited. METHODS: A total of 261 patients undergoing elective or urgent PCI were randomized to either eptifibatide plus enoxaparin or eptifibatide plus unfractionated heparin. RESULTS: The primary end point of the study, the bleeding index (change in hemoglobin corrected for blood transfusions), was 0.8 in the patients randomized to enoxaparin and 1.1 in patients randomized to unfractionated heparin (p = 0.15). The rate of vascular access site complications was 9.3% in the enoxaparin arm versus 9.8% in the unfractionated heparin arm (p = NS). The rate of bleeding complications was not significantly different between the two arms of the study, including in those patients who received vascular closure devices. The rate of angiographic complications was 6.3% in the enoxaparin group and 6.2% in the unfractionated heparin group (p = NS). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization at 48 h or 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with unfractionated heparin plus eptifibatide, the combination of enoxaparin plus eptifibatide is not associated with an excess of bleeding or vascular complications, including in those receiving closure devices. Despite no monitoring of anticoagulation activity with enoxaparin, there was no apparent increase in angiographic or clinical complications.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Randomized double-blind safety study of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with tirofiban and aspirin: the ACUTE II study. The Antithrombotic Combination Using Tirofiban and Enoxaparin.

BACKGROUND: In comparison with treatment with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and aspirin (ASA), both tirofiban administered with UFH and ASA, and enoxaparin plus ASA have shown superiority in reducing cardiac ischemic events in patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Replacing UFH with enoxaparin when tirofiban is administered to patients may offer further therapeutic benefit, but could also increase bleeding. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to provide estimates of the frequency of bleeding complications, as defined by means of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction(TIMI) group, and collect data on clinical efficacy of the combination of tirofiban with enoxaparin plus ASA. METHODS: Five hundred twenty-five patients with UA/NSTEMI were treated with tirofiban coadministered with ASA and randomized to receive either UFH (n = 210) or enoxaparin (n = 315). Therapy was administered for 24 to 96 hours. Bleeding incidences were assessed until 24 hours after trial therapy was discontinued; other clinical outcomes were assessed for as long as 30 days. RESULTS: The total bleeding rate (TIMI major + minor + loss-no-site) for the UFH group versus the enoxaparin group was 4.8% vs 3.5% (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, CI 0.6-3.4). The TIMI major and minor bleeding rates for the UFH versus the enoxaparin groups were 1.0% versus 0.3% (OR 3.0, CI 0.3-33.8) and 4.3% versus 2.5% (OR 1.7, CI 0.7-4.6). There was an increase in nuisance cutaneous and oral bleeds (<50 mL of blood loss) in the enoxaparin group. Death or myocardial infarction occurred with similar frequency in the 2 groups (9.0% vs 9.2%). However, refractory ischemia requiring urgent revascularization and rehospitalization because of unstable angina occurred more frequently in the UFH group (4.3% vs 0.6% and 7.1% vs 1.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with tirofiban plus enoxaparin appears safe, relative to therapy with tirofiban plus UFH.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Economic assessment of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndrome patients: results from the ESSENCE randomized trial. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q wave Coronary Events [unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction].

BACKGROUND: In the ESSENCE trial, subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) reduced the 30-day incidence of death, myocardial infarction, and recurrent angina relative to intravenous unfractionated heparin in 3171 patients with acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction). No increase in major bleeding was seen. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 936 ESSENCE patients randomized in the United States, 655 had hospital billing data collected. For the remainder, hospital costs were imputed with a multivariable linear regression model (R2=.86). Physician fees were estimated from the Medicare Fee Schedule. During the initial hospitalization, major resource use was reduced for enoxaparin patients, with the largest effect seen with coronary angioplasty (15% versus 20% for heparin, P=.04). At 30 days, these effects persisted, with the largest reductions seen in diagnostic catheterization (57% versus 63% for heparin, P=.04) and coronary angioplasty (18% versus 22%, P=.08). All resource use trends seen in the US cohort were also evident in the overall ESSENCE study population. In the United States, the mean cost of a course of enoxaparin therapy was $155, whereas that for heparin was $80. The total medical costs (hospital, physician, drug) for the initial hospitalization were $11 857 for enoxaparin and $12620 for heparin, a cost advantage for the enoxaparin arm of $763 (P=.18). At the end of 30 days, the cumulative cost savings associated with enoxaparin was $1172 (P=.04). In 200 bootstrap samples of the 30-day data, 94% of the samples showed a cost advantage for enoxaparin. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute coronary syndrome, low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) both improves important clinical outcomes and saves money relative to therapy with standard unfractionated heparin.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in patients with acute medical illnesses who may be at risk for venous thromboembolism have not been determined in adequately designed trials. METHODS: In a double-blind study, we randomly assigned 1102 hospitalized patients older than 40 years to receive 40 mg of enoxaparin, 20 mg of enoxaparin, or placebo subcutaneously once daily for 6 to 14 days. Most patients were not in an intensive care unit. The primary outcome was venous thromboembolism between days 1 and 14, defined as deep-vein thrombosis detected by bilateral venography (or duplex ultrasonography) between days 6 and 14 (or earlier if clinically indicated) or documented pulmonary embolism. The duration of follow-up was three months. RESULTS: The primary outcome could be assessed in 866 patients. The incidence of venous thromboembolism was significantly lower in the group that received 40 mg of enoxaparin (5.5 percent [16 of 291 patients]) than in the group that received placebo (14.9 percent [43 of 288 patients]) (relative risk, 0.37; 97.6 percent confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.63; P< 0.001). The benefit observed with 40 mg of enoxaparin was maintained at three months. There was no significant difference in the incidence of venous thromboembolism between the group that received 20 mg of enoxaparin (43 of 287 patients [15.0 percent]) and the placebo group. The incidence of adverse effects did not differ significantly between the placebo group and either enoxaparin group. By day 110, 50 patients had died in the placebo group (13.9 percent), 51 had died in the 20-mg group (14.7 percent), and 41 had died in the 40-mg group (11.4 percent); the differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic treatment with 40 mg of enoxaparin subcutaneously per day safely and effectively reduces the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with acute medical illnesses.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Randomized trial of low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus unfractionated heparin for unstable coronary artery disease: one-year results of the ESSENCE Study. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q Wave Coronary Events.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether the observed benefits of enoxaparin were maintained beyond the early phase; a one-year follow-up survey was undertaken for patients enrolled in the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) study. BACKGROUND: We have previously reported a significant benefit of low molecular weight as compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the 14- and 30-day incidence of a composite end point of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or recurrent angina in patients with unstable angina or non-Qwave MI. METHODS: The study recruited 3,171 patients with recent-onset rest angina and underlying ischemic heart disease. All patients received oral aspirin daily and were randomized to receive enoxaparin subcutaneously every 12 h or UFH (intravenous bolus followed by continuous infusion) in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion for a median of 2.6 days. RESULTS: The incidence of the composite triple end point at one year was lower among patients receiving enoxaparin as compared with those receiving UFH (32.0% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.022), with a trend toward a lower incidence of the secondary composite end point of death or MI (11.5% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.082). At one year, the need for diagnostic catheterization and coronary revascularization was lower in the enoxaparin group (55.8% vs. 59.4%, p = 0.036 and 35.9% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unstable angina or non-Qwave MI, enoxaparin therapy significantly reduced the rates of recurrent ischemic events and invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the short term with sustained benefit at one year.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin for prevention of deep venous thrombosis after elective knee arthroplasty. Enoxaparin Clinical Trial Group.

This study was a randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, and unfractionated heparin to prevent deep venous thrombosis after elective total knee arthroplasty. Four hundred fifty-three patients were randomized and received study medications. The primary efficacy evaluation was unilateral contrast venography done at the end of study or earlier if clinically indicated. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of bleeding episodes. Patients were assigned to 1 of 2 postoperative treatment groups: Enoxaparin 30 mg subcutaneous every 12 hours (228 patients), or unfractionated heparin 5000 units subcutaneous every 8 hours (225 patients). The incidence of proximal and distal deep venous thrombosis in the Enoxaparin group was 24.6% (56/228), and in the heparin group 34.2% (77/225). Three major hemorrhagic episodes were observed in each treatment group. Two cases of pulmonary embolism occurred in patients receiving heparin (1 fatal); no cases occurred in patients receiving Enoxaparin. This study showed that Enoxaparin administered postoperatively 30 mg every 12 hours is more effective and as safe as unfractionated heparin prophylaxis to prevent deep venous thrombosis in patients having elective total knee arthroplasty.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

A novel point-of-care enoxaparin monitor for use during percutaneous coronary intervention. Results of the Evaluating Enoxaparin Clotting Times (ELECT) Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to discern a target range of anticoagulation for enoxaparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as measured by the Rapidpoint ENOX (Pharmanetics Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina), a new point-of-care test. BACKGROUND: In the U.S., enoxaparin has been used in only a small proportion of PCI procedures, partly because a rapid enoxaparin-specific assay was unavailable. METHODS: We analyzed data from 445 enrolled patients receiving subcutaneous or intravenous enoxaparin in a prospective, multicenter study. Serial anticoagulation measurements and clinical outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: The in-hospital composite occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, and urgent target vessel revascularization was 5.4%, and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding, minor bleeding, and any reported bleeding occurred in 0.2%, 1.3%, and 7.9% of patients, respectively. No significant association between procedural ENOX times and ischemic events was observed (p = 0.222), although the event rate was 4.0% among those with ENOX times between 250 to 450 s versus 7.2% for those outside this range (p = 0.134). Increasing ENOX time at sheath removal was correlated with any bleeding (p = 0.010) with a 1% increase for every approximately 30-s rise. CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic events were infrequent, and the rate appeared lowest in the mid-range of ENOX times. Bleeding events increased with increasing ENOX times. These observations, combined with a suggested procedural anti-Xa level of 0.8 to 1.8 IU/ml, translate into a recommended ENOX time range of 250 to 450 s for PCI and <200 to 250 s for sheath removal.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Decrease of total hemorrhage with reduced doses of enoxaparin in high risk unstable angina. ENHNFAI study. (Enoxaparin vs non-fractionated heparin in unstable angina). Preliminary report].

UNLABELLED: In this prospective, randomized and controlled study, we compare complications in 2 groups of patients: group 1, enoxaparin 0.8 mg/kg, subcutaneous every 12 hours during 5 days, and group 2, intravenous unfractionated heparin during 5 days, by infusion treated to activate partial tromboplastin time 1.5-2 the upper limit of normal. Blood samples were obtained at 4, 12, 24 hours and at day 5 of treatment, to measure anti-Xa levels, and also, evaluated end points at 30 days, between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed with clinical and angiographic variables between groups, with p < 0.05. RESULTS: 203 consecutive patients, average age of 60.5 +/- 11.2 years, and 80% men, were included. There were no differences in clinical and angiographic characteristics. All patients with enoxaparin had therapeutic levels of anti-Xa, of 0.5 to 0.67 U/mL. There was increasing risk of total bleeding in group 2 (18.7%) than in group 1 (5.6%), with RR = 1.72 (95% CI 1.29, 2.29), p = .003. Also, there was 33.3% of MACE in group 2, and only 17.8% in group 1, with RR = 1.88 (CI 95% 1.29, 2.29), p = .011. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Low doses of enoxaparine achieve therapeutic levels, since the first 4 hours of treatment. 2) A significant reduction of total bleeding occurred with the low doses of enoxaparin, with the same efficacy to reduce MACE during follow-up.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Enoxaparin and dalteparin in unstable angina: new indication. Enoxaparin: a reference treatment. Dalteparin: no better than unfractionated heparin.

(1) Enoxaparin and dalteparin are the only low-molecular-weight heparins so far approved for the treatment of unstable angina and non Q-wave myocardial infarction. (2) In two trials involving over 7,000 patients with unstable angina or non Q-wave myocardial infarction, the enoxaparin + aspirin combination was more effective than the unfractionated heparin + aspirin combination in reducing the risk of death, myocardial infarction or angina relapse. (3) In the same indication another trial showed no significant difference between the dalteparin + aspirin combination and the unfractionated heparin + aspirin combination on the basis of the same end point. (4) The dose must be calculated precisely according to bodyweight, as there is a severe risk of bleeding if the recommended dose is exceeded. (5) Continued enoxaparin therapy after clinical stabilisation has no supplementary benefit compared with aspirin alone.

Angina, Unstable↗
PubMed1996

A multicenter randomized double-blind study of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolic disease in elderly in-patients bedridden for an acute medical illness. The Enoxaparin in Medicine Study Group.

A multicenter, randomized double-blind study compared in two parallel groups the efficacy and safety of a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin 20 mg once daily, with unfractionated heparin (UFH) 5000 IU twice daily, administered subcutaneously for 10 days, in the prevention of venous thrombosis disease in 442 hospitalized elderly patients bedridden for an acute medical illness. The main efficacy endpoint was defined as the occurrence of venous thrombosis, diagnosed by a daily fibrinogen uptake test, and/or documented clinical pulmonary embolism. Intention-to-treat analysis of efficacy showed that the incidence of venous thromboembolic events was low: 4.8% (10/207) in the LMWH group (9 episodes of isotopic venous thrombosis and one of scintigraphic pulmonary embolism), and 4.6% (10/216) in the UFH group (10 episodes of isotopic venous thrombosis). The two treatments were equivalent, where equivalence was defined as a maximum difference of 7% between the two groups (p = 0.0005). There were no significant differences in terms of safety between the 216 patients in the LMWH group and the 223 patients in the UFH group who received at least one injection of the randomized treatment. During the study period, 15 patients (3.4%) died (7 in the LMWH group and 8 in the UFH group): 2 sudden deaths, one in each group including one case in which pulmonary embolism could not be excluded since no autopsy was performed, and 13 others deaths unrelated to the study treatments. Six patients (1.4%) presented a bleeding complication: 2 (0.9%) in the enoxaparin group (one major and one minor hemorrhage), and 4 (1.8%) in the UFH group (2 major and 2 minor hemorrhages). These results indicate that subcutaneous enoxaparin 20 mg once daily for 10 days is as effective and well tolerated as subcutaneous UFH 5000 IU twice daily in the prevention of venous thromboembolic disease in bedridden elderly in-patients presenting an acute medical illness.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1991

Low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) vs dextran 70. The prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. The Danish Enoxaparin Study Group.

A prospective randomized study compared the thromboprophylactic efficacy and safety of a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), enoxaparin (40.6 mg subcutaneously once daily), with a standard regimen of dextran 70 in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. Deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed by bilateral ascending phlebography 7 to 11 days after operation. Two hundred forty-six patients were included and 219 were eligible for analysis. Deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed in seven of 108 patients in the LMWH group and in 24 of 111 patients in the dextran group. Clinical symptoms of pulmonary embolism did not develop in any patients during the study. In the postoperative period, patients receiving LMWH had a lower blood loss in drains and required fewer blood transfusions than patients receiving dextran, although no significant differences were noted between the groups with respect to the total number of blood transfusions required. Bleeding events and adverse events did not differ between the groups. None of the patients died in hospital during the study. One patient in the LMWH group died at home 15 days after the operation. Three patients receiving dextran had development of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis after hospital discharge. In conclusion, enoxaparin was a more effective thromboprophylactic than a standard regimen of dextran in patients undergoing total hip replacement. The two regimens were equally safe under the clinical conditions.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

The Essence Trial: Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Unstable Angina and Non-Q-Wave MI: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study Comparing Enoxaparin and Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin: Methods and Design.

Antithrombotic therapy reduces the risk of recurrent ischemic events in patients with unstable angina. The primary aim of the ESSENCE trial is to evaluate the efficacy of enoxaparin (low molecular weight heparin) versus unfractionated heparin, plus aspirin, in patients with rest angina or non-Q-wave infarction. This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 3180 patients comparing enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg sc bid, with unfractionated heparin via continuous iv infusion to maintain the aPTT at 2 x control. Patients within 24 hours of the onset of acute myocardial ischemia without ST elevation are eligible, and trial therapy is administered for a minimum of 48 hours to a maximum of 8 days. Primary endpoints analyzed are death, myocardial infarction (MI), or recurrent angina at 14 days. Currently 3019 patients have been randomized in 10 countries. The mean age is 64 years, 33% are female, and 46% have had a prior MI. The overall event rates at 14 days are 1.7% mortality, 5.9% subsequent MI, and 17% recurrent angina. The composite triple endpoint rate is 23.6%. Recruitment should be complete by June 1996. The methods and design of the study are presented in this article.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1999

Thrombocytosis after prophylactic administration of enoxaparin: unexpected findings in a Polish prospective multicenter trial on the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin in the prevention of postoperative thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-related thrombocytopenia is a common complication of heparin administration and therefore platelet count was monitored in our study. METHODS EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Prospective multicentre study. SETTING: 14 Departments of General, Thoracic or OrthopaedicSurgery, Poland. PATIENTS: 290 patients--150 general or thoracic surgery patients aged above 40 years, and 140 orthopaedic surgery patients aged between 18 and 60 years. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received 20 mg (general and thoracic surgery) or 40 mg of enoxaparin (orthopaedic surgery) once daily subcutaneously both before surgery and during postoperative immobilisation. MEASURES: Platelet count was evaluated prior to surgery and on the 5th, 7th, 11th and 15th day following the operation. RESULTS: There was neither thrombocytopenia nor heparin-induced thrombosis. Paradoxically, postoperative platelet count in most cases increased slightly but statistically significantly, but in some however, even above 600 G/l, nevertheless in these patients no thrombotic complications occurred. Postoperative thrombocytosis was greater in patients with neoplasms as well as those with excessive perioperative blood loss and transfusions. CONCLUSIONS: As platelet count was not the main topic of our study, the presented data should be regarded only as preliminary. Further investigations to resolve the cause of the observed phenomenon of thrombocytosis are therefore necessary.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Bleeding complications with enoxaparin for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis.

The safest and most efficacious method of deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis remains controversial. With the use of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, becoming ubiquitous in many institutions, we specifically examined bleeding complications related to its use. A case-control study was conducted on consecutive patients receiving enoxaparin prophylaxis after primary or revision total knee or total hip arthroplasty or hip hemiarthroplasty. Matched controls receiving no pharmacologic anticoagulation were identified. Patient and operative characteristics, hematologic values, and timing of enoxaparin dosing were analyzed as related to major and minor bleeding complications. A total of 152 procedures with enoxaparin and an equal number of control cases were included for a total of 304 patients. The enoxaparin group had a 23.7% total complication rate compared to 16.5% for the control group (P = .11). The power of the test was .35 and indicated that approximately 970 patients would need to be reviewed to have at least an 80% chance of finding a statistically significant difference. Major complications occurred in 5 patients (3.3%) in the enoxaparin group and 2 (1.3%) in the control group (P = .25, power = .21). Minor complications in the enoxaparin group were slightly higher but not significant at 20.4% versus 15.1% in the control group (P = .23). There were significantly fewer minor complications in the enoxaparin group after primary single-joint procedures (16.50%) than all other procedures (32.4%). Patients receiving the first dose of enoxaparin 10 hours or more postoperatively had significantly fewer complications (P = .05). The postoperative hematocrit drop was significantly greater for the enoxaparin group for all procedures (P = .003) as well as for primary single procedures (P = .0005). The postoperative transfusion requirement was significantly greater after primary single procedures (P = .02) in the enoxaparin group. One patient with an epidural catheter and receiving enoxaparin postoperatively developed an epidural hematoma. Although there were not significantly more complications with enoxaparin, there was evidence of significantly increased postoperative bleeding. The low-power analysis reveals that a large number of patients (970-1,700) are required to show a statistically significant difference in bleeding complications between the 2 groups. To minimize complications, a short period to allow initial hemiostasis postoperatively is recommended, as is preferential use of enoxaparin for primary single-joint replacements. Enoxaparin used in conjunction with an indwelling epidural catheter is not recommended.

Aged↗