SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Equivalence Trial”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1992

General design issues in efficacy, equivalency and superiority trials.

Critical discussion is offered of design issues pertinent to three categories of clinical trials: efficacy trials, in which an experimental intervention is compared to an inert control, and equivalency and superiority trials, in which an experimental intervention is compared to an active control. The issues discussed are sample-size determination and power, problems in designing and analyzing multicenter trials, broad versus concentrated sampling of patients, the need (or not) for a placebo control group in an active control trial, the possible appropriateness of crossing patients over from one regimen to another, various methods of randomization, the intention-to-treat principle in repeated measurements studies, and possible logical conflicts between inferences from superiority trials and inferences from equivalency trials.

Drug Evaluation↗

PubMed1992

Low-dose radiation therapy and reduced chemotherapy in childhood Hodgkin's disease: the experience of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology.

PURPOSE: With the aim of decreasing undesirable side effects of therapy, we investigated the reduction of both chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) in children with Hodgkin's disease, and compared Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Farmitalia Carlo Erba, Rueil-Malmaison, France), bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) alone to mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP) and ABVD in favorable cases and assessed the effectiveness of low-dose RT (20 Gy) after good response to chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A French national study began in 1982 that included 238 pediatric patients with Hodgkin's disease. Initial staging was clinical and without laparotomy. In patients with localized disease (IA-IIA), an equivalence trial compared the effectiveness of four cycles of ABVD with two cycles of ABVD that were alternated with two cycles of MOPP. Patients with more advanced disease (IB-IIB-III-IV) received three courses of MOPP that was alternated with three courses of ABVD. All of the patients who achieved a good remission after chemotherapy were administered 20 Gy RT, which was limited to the initially involved areas for localized disease, and encompassed the paraaortic nodes and the spleen as well for more advanced stages. When a good remission was not obtained, 40 Gy RT was administered. RESULTS: At the completion of chemotherapy, 227 patients (97%) were considered good responders, whereas 11 did not achieve a good remission. With a median follow-up of 6 years, the 6-year actuarial survival was 92% and the disease-free survival was 86%. The relapse-free survival in favorable stages was 90% in the ABVD arm and was 87% in the MOPP and ABVD arm. In June 1987, inclusion of stage IV patients was discontinued because of poor results. CONCLUSIONS: Present findings indicate that (1) in favorable stages, ABVD alone and alternating MOPP and ABVD are equivalent, and (2) chemotherapy followed by 20 Gy RT represents a valid therapeutic approach in the vast majority of children with Hodgkin's disease.

Actuarial Analysis↗

PubMed2026

Acetate- Versus Lactate-Buffered Crystalloids for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in Patients Without Access to Rectal NSAIDs: A Multicentre Double-Blind Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Aggressive peri-procedural intravenous fluid (IVF) therapy with lactated Ringer's solution (LR) reduces the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), but the standard 8-h protocol is impractical in outpatient settings and the optimal fluid type remains uncertain. We compared LR with an acetate-buffered balanced crystalloid (AC) using a symptom-guided 4-h aggressive IVF protocol. METHODS: This multicentre, double-blind, randomized superiority trial was conducted at three academic hospitals in Korea where rectal NSAIDs are unavailable. Adults with native papillae and moderate-to-high PEP risk were randomized to receive LR or AC. The IVF protocol comprised 10 mL/kg boluses before and after ERCP, followed by 3 mL/kg/h for 4 hours and extended to 8 hours if abdominal pain developed or worsened. The primary outcome was PEP incidence; secondary outcomes included early post-ERCP pain and adverse events. RESULTS: Of 813 patients (404 LR, 409 AC), PEP occurred in 12.4% of the LR group and 11.5% of the AC group (relative risk [RR] 0.93; 95% CI, 0.64-1.35; P = 0.70). Rates of mild (7.9% vs. 7.1%) and moderate (4.5% vs. 4.4%) PEP were similar, and no severe PEP or fluid overload occurred. Among the 68.3% of patients who remained asymptomatic at 4 hours and required only 4-h IVF, PEP occurred in 7.4%, with no cases of severe PEP. CONCLUSION: In this superiority trial, acetate-buffered crystalloid did not reduce PEP compared with lactated Ringer's solution, and no significant safety differences were observed between the two agents. Lactated Ringer's remains the recommended first-line crystalloid for aggressive hydration when rectal NSAIDs are unavailable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05832047).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Treatment of OSA using mandibular advancement versus CPAP in improving cardiovascular health.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea is a significant risk factor for hypertension. We assessed the relative effectiveness of mandibular advancement device (MAD) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in reducing 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and other health-related outcomes over 12 months. METHODS: In a randomized, non-inferiority trial, 321 participants with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk were recruited for polysomnography. Of these, 220 with moderate-to-severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15 events/hour) were randomized to MAD or CPAP (1:1). We report the final outcomes at the 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 180 participants (MAD: 89; CPAP: 91) completed the 12-month follow-up. Median usage for MAD and CPAP was 5.5 and 4.9 h per night, respectively. Compared to baseline, the 24 h mean arterial BP at 12 months decreased by 2.3 mmHg (P = 0.200) in the MAD group and by 1.0 mmHg (P = 0.999) in the CPAP group. The difference between-groups was -0.6 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -2.53 to 1.39, non-inferiority P < 0.019). The MAD group demonstrated a larger reduction in asleep BP compared to the CPAP group. The prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness in the MAD group decreased from 30.3% at baseline to 10.1% at 12-month follow-up (P = 0.001), and from 38.5% to 7.7% in the CPAP group (P < 0.001). The between-group difference was 10.6% (P = 0.097). No significant within-group or between-group differences were observed in the prevalence of arrhythmias and plasma levels of cardiac biomarkers. CONCLUSION: At 12-month, MAD is non-inferior to CPAP for reducing 24 h mean arterial BP in participants with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04119999.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Optimizing prostate biopsy decision making - (MUSIC-screen): A 1:1 randomized controlled trial comparing micro-ultrasound versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Micro-ultrasound (microUS) represents a potential alternative to multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMRI) in guiding prostate biopsy, with level 1 evidence demonstrating non-inferiority to detect Grade Group ≥2 (GG ≥ 2) prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men. However, a critical gap remains in the screening pathway, in which imaging is needed to identify men at risk and determine whether biopsy is warranted. METHODS: MUSIC-Screen is a phase 3, open-label, noninferiority 1:1 randomized controlled trial evaluating microUS as an alternative imaging compared to mpMRI for determining the need for prostate biopsy in biopsy- and imaging- naïve men at risk for GG ≥ 2. A total of 1284 men will be randomized to undergo either microUS or mpMRI. Men with PRI-MUS 3-5 or PI-RADS 3-5 lesion will undergo targeted and systematic biopsy. Men with negative imaging and PSA density ≥ 0.15 will undergo systematic biopsy, while those with PSA density < 0.15 will defer biopsy. RESULTS: The primary outcome is GG ≥ 2 detection in each study arm. The primary hypothesis is that microUS is non-inferior to mpMRI for screening and detection of GG ≥ 2. Secondary objectives include comparison of GG ≥ 2 detection rates in targeted cores among patients with PRI-MUS or PI-RADS scores of 3-5, proportion of men who defer biopsy but are diagnosed with GG ≥ 2 within 8 years, assessment of the negative predictive value of each imaging modality, and health economic analyses. CONCLUSION: MUSIC-Screen will determine whether microUS can be used as an imaging modality to inform biopsy decision making that is non-inferior to mpMRI for GG ≥ 2 prostate cancer detection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06626022.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome in Practice: A Randomized Trial of 0/1-Hour vs 0/3-Hour Troponin Testing.

BACKGROUND: For suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS), guidelines recommend using high-sensitivity troponins (hs-cTn) in accelerated diagnostic pathways (ADPs) with 0/1-hour recommended over 0/3-hour ADP. However, implementation of these ADPs, with universal use of hs-cTns, has not been directly compared in randomized trials OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the efficiency and safety of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1-hour and a 0/3-hour ADP when implemented in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This pragmatic, randomized, noninferiority implementation trial compared the safety and efficiency of clinician decision making using these 2 pathways. To prevent incorporation bias, an independent hs-cTnI was used for formal adjudication using the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (MI). Efficiency was judged by the proportion of patients discharged within 4 hours. The safety endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 30 days (adjudicated index or representation type 1 MI, cardiovascular death, and urgent coronary revascularization) for those who were considered not to have ACS and discharged. The noninferiority margin, for absolute difference in sensitivity, between the ESC 0/1-hour and the 0/3-hour ADP was set at 3%, assessed with a 1-sided 97.5% CI. RESULTS: From December 2021 to July 2024, of 13,983 screened 3,543 individual patients with suspected ACS were recruited and consented from 2 major emergency departments in North-West England, with 100% follow-up achieved for all representations to any national hospital. The median age was 60 years (IQR: 49.5-70.5 years), 53% were men, 6.7%, and 7.6% had adjudicated index type 1 MI and MACE within 30 days, respectively. The turnaround time from sample to result for central laboratory hs-cTnT was 81 minutes (IQR: 69-101 minutes). The proportion of patients discharged within 4 hours was relatively low and did not differ substantially (21.8% vs 19.2%, P = 0.07). In addition, the 0/1-hour pathway was noninferior for safety, in patients discharged, compared with the 0/3-hour pathway, absolute difference in sensitivity was +4.2% (1-sided 97.5% CI: -2.5) in favor of the 0/1-hour pathway. The calculated sensitivities were 93.7% (95% CI: 88.4%-97.1%) vs 89.5% (95% CI: 82.7%-94.3%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the ESC 0/1-hour pathway failed to discharge significantly more patients within 4 hours of presentation compared with the 0/3-hour ADP. In addition, The ESC 0/1-hour was noninferior to the 0/3-hour hs-cTn pathway for safety of discharge, although safety for both pathways was less than that imputed by observational studies. This trial demonstrates that perceived benefits to emergency department efficiency of a reduced sampling interval are mitigated by central laboratory turnaround times as well as system constraints. (Pragmatic Randomised Trial of the ESC 0/1 Versus 0/3 Hour Troponin Pathway [MACROS2]; NCT05322395).

Acute Coronary Syndrome↗

PubMed2026

A multi-center, open-labelled, randomized controlled extended phase III non-inferiority clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity and tolerability of poliomyelitis vaccine (Vero cells), inactivated, Sabin strains administered with or without routine infant vaccines.

BACKGROUND: Oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) has been reported to cause vaccine-derived poliovirus and vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis, and the limited global supply of conventional IPV has led many countries to rely on fractional-dose IPV regimens alongside OPV. The current study aims to assess the sIPV safety and immunogenicity when given concurrently with or in a staggered manner with routine immunization. METHODS: A multi-country, multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled, extended phase III non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted with 1442 healthy infants aged 6-8 weeks from Bangladesh and Pakistan enrolled and randomized into four groups, i.e., co-administration group 1 (group C1), co-administration group 2 (group C2), staggered administration group 1 (group S1) and staggered administration group 2 (group S2). Antibody levels were determined using the collected sera for immunogenicity evaluation. The difference in seroconversion rates between the coadministration group and the staggered administration group is compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel χ2 (CMH-χ2) test, stratified by study site. Non-inferiority is concluded if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the rate difference (coadministration group minus staggered administration group) is greater than -10%. The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05850364), and the protocol and statistical analysis plan are available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05850364. The trial is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: The post-vaccination seroconversion rates for PV I were 90.3% (306/339) in group C1 and 87.0% (261/300) in group S1, for PV II, 91.7% (311/339) in group C1 and 91.3% (274/300) in group S1 and for PV III, 86.4% (293/339) in group C1 and 92.3% (277/300) in group S1. Among adverse reactions (ARs) reported within 7 days of vaccination, the incidence was similarly high in both the co-administration and staggered vaccination groups (92.8% vs. 95.5%). INTERPRETATION: Our results demonstrated favorable safety and immunogenicity of co-administration of sIPV with other routine infant vaccines according to a 3-dose primary immunization schedule.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Artificial intelligence-assisted detection and optical differentiation of colorectal lesions in Lynch syndrome surveillance (CADLY2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled superiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer-aided detection (CADe) systems improve adenoma detection in average-risk colorectal cancer screening. Meanwhile, evidence in Lynch syndrome surveillance is sparse and inconsistent. We assessed the effect of CADe on adenoma detection during Lynch syndrome surveillance. Computer-aided optical diagnosis (CADx) performance for optical differentiation of colorectal lesions was evaluated as a secondary aim. METHODS: CADLY2 was an international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled superiority trial at nine specialised hereditary cancer surveillance centres in Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain. Adults aged 18 years or older with genetically confirmed Lynch syndrome scheduled for surveillance colonoscopy were randomly assigned (1:1) to high-definition white-light (HD-WL) colonoscopy alone or to HD-WL colonoscopy with computer-aided assistance from CAD EYE (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). CAD EYE was used for CADe during withdrawal and for CADx after lesion detection. Randomisation was done centrally through a secure web-based system using Pocock's minimisation algorithm with a stochastic component and was stratified by centre, sex, previous colorectal cancer, underlying pathogenic variant, and interval since previous colonoscopy. Allocation concealment was ensured through the centralised web-based system. Patients were masked to group allocation until the start of withdrawal in procedures with mild sedation, or until completion of the procedure in procedures with propofol-based sedation. Endoscopists were not masked. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate, defined as the proportion of patients with at least one histopathologically confirmed adenoma, analysed in the full analysis set (defined as all randomly allocated patients with available data for the primary outcome). The diagnostic performance of the CADx system was evaluated as a secondary outcome. The safety analysis set comprised all randomly allocated patients who underwent a study colonoscopy. This study is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00030695, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between May 9, 2023, and Oct 30, 2025, 757 patients were randomly allocated to HD-WL colonoscopy (377 patients) or to AI-assisted colonoscopy (380 patients); 733 patients were included in the full analysis set (369 HD-WL and 364 AI-assisted). The median age was 49 years (IQR 38-59) in the HD-WL group and 50 years (38-59) in the AI-assisted group; 213 (58%) were female and 156 (42%) male in the HD-WL group, and 207 (57%) were female and 157 (43%) male in the AI-assisted group. The adenoma detection rate was 30·9% (114 of 369 patients) with HD-WL versus 33·8% (123 of 364 patients) with CADe assistance (odds ratio 1·14 [95% CI 0·83-1·57], p=0·41). For CADx differentiation of neoplastic versus non-neoplastic lesions in the paired lesion-level analysis, with histopathology as the reference standard and sessile serrated lesions and traditional serrated adenomas classified as non-neoplastic, CADx sensitivity was 85·9% (95% CI 82·0-89·1) and specificity was 91·4% (89·4-93·0). Three adverse events occurred in the AI-assisted group: two mild post-polypectomy bleedings and one serious pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis unrelated to the procedure. No adverse events occurred in the HD-WL group. INTERPRETATION: CADe-assisted colonoscopy did not show the absolute improvement in adenoma detection rate that was assumed in the prespecified sample-size calculation. CADx did not clearly improve lesion differentiation beyond expert optical diagnosis in expert Lynch syndrome surveillance settings. FUNDING: Third-party research funding of the National Center for Hereditary Tumor Syndromes, University Hospital Bonn.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Moxifloxacin Versus Azithromycin for the Treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium: The FARTHEST Study.

BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) is increasingly characterized by high rates of macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance. International guidelines recommend resistance-guided therapy; however, access to genotypic testing is limited, and randomized trial evidence is lacking. We assessed the efficacy of moxifloxacin and azithromycin without resistance assays. METHODS: This monocentric, open-label, superiority, randomized controlled trial enrolled adults with MG infection detected by multiplex PCR, randomized 1:1 to receive moxifloxacin 400 mg daily for 10 days or azithromycin 500 mg daily for 6 days. A test of cure was performed ≥28 days after treatment completion. The primary endpoint was microbiological cure in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations. Subgroup analyses assessed symptomatic versus asymptomatic infections, doxycycline exposure, re-treatment, and sexual behavior. RESULTS: Among 358 randomized participants, 87.0% of those treated with moxifloxacin and 61.2% of those treated with azithromycin achieved microbiological cure in the ITT analysis (absolute risk difference 25.8%, 95% CI 16.5, 35.2). The superiority of moxifloxacin was confirmed in the ITT and PP populations. Moxifloxacin remained superior across most subgroups, whereas azithromycin showed comparable efficacy only among heterosexual individuals. Doxycycline coadministration did not improve outcomes. Both regimens were well tolerated, with only one case of discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin demonstrated superior efficacy compared to azithromycin for treating MG infection in the absence of resistance testing. These randomized data support the use of moxifloxacin as a first-line option when resistance assays are unavailable and may inform treatment strategies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

MIS-TLIF Versus Open TLIF in Combined Lumbar Stenosis and Low-Grade Spondylolisthesis : Of Discharge Timing and Treatment Pricing.

STUDY DESIGN: An open-label, randomized, noninferiority clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of the MIS-TLIF over the O-TLIF in patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis combined with low-grade spondylolisthesis by comparing the clinical efficacy and safety. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In patients with combined lumbar spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis, it remains uncertain whether minimally invasive fusion surgery is noninferior to the open approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an open-label, noninferiority trial involving patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis combined with low-grade spondylolisthesis. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either MIS-TLIF or open TLIF surgery. The primary endpoint was the reduction in the Oswestry disability index (ODI) score from baseline to three months postsurgery, with a noninferiority margin of 12 points. Secondary outcomes included three-month changes from baseline in back and leg pain, neuropathic pain, satisfaction with treatment, intraoperative data, and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: In the modified intention-to-treat population, the mean difference was 0.4, with the corresponding 90% CI of -5.7 to 6.5, having a lower bound below the noninferiority margin of 12. Similar results were obtained by analysis of the per-protocol population. 82.8% of patients achieved the MCID for the ODI. Results for secondary outcomes (clinical scales, complications) showed no significant differences between the treatment groups (all P >0.05). Although the open TLIF group had a hospital stay that was 1.5 days longer ( P =0.005) and required additional analgesia more frequently ( P =0.026), direct costs were 10.5% higher in the MIS-TLIF group ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first high-quality study comparing open TLIF and MIS-TLIF with a validated primary endpoint. Among patients with combined lumbar degenerative stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis, MIS-TLIF resulted in clinical outcomes at three months that were noninferior to those with open TLIF.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of Elagolix Versus Dienogest for Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Endometriosis Pain: A Phase III, Multicentric, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Non-Inferiority Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of elagolix with dienogest in women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. DESIGN: A multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel-group, active-controlled, non-inferiority phase III study. SETTING: Nineteen clinical centres across India. STUDY POPULATION: Women (18-49 years) diagnosed with endometriosis and experiencing moderate-to-severe pain. METHODS: Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive oral elagolix (150 mg once daily) or dienogest (2 mg once daily) for 24 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in endometriosis-related pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) from baseline to Day 85. Secondary outcomes included changes in NRS (Day 169), dysmenorrhoea, non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) scores (Days 85 and 169), rescue medication use, patient global impression of change (PGIC), adverse events and bone mineral density. RESULTS: Of 340 patients screened, 230 were randomised (115 per group). At Day 85, both arms showed similar reductions in NRS pain scores with a treatment difference of 0.04 (95% CI: -0.3, 0.37) [p = 0.9747] demonstrating non-inferiority as upper 95% CI was below pre-specified margin of 1.5. At Day 169, both arms showed comparable improvements in overall pain, dysmenorrhoea and NMPP from baseline (p = 0.9372, p = 0.8884, and p = 0.9616, respectively). Rescue medication use and PGIC were comparable between treatment arms. Adverse event incidence was similar (elagolix: 14.8%; dienogest: 19.1%), with no serious TEAEs or discontinuations. No significant bone mineral density changes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Elagolix demonstrated non-inferiority to dienogest with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, supporting its use in managing endometriosis-associated pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: CTRI/2023/01/049292.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Short-term safety of dual versus single antiplatelet therapy in flow diversion for distal intracranial aneurysms: results from the DART trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow diverters (FDs) have become one of the primary treatments for intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, their use in distal IA has been associated with higher complication rates compared with other techniques. The development of coated FDs, in combination with novel antiplatelet regimens, offers promising strategies to improve the safety profile of FDs in this context. This trial aimed to compare mono antiplatelet therapy (MAPT) using prasugrel versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and prasugrel for the treatment of distal IA using the p48 MW HPC FD (WallabyPhenox). METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, single-blind, non-inferiority randomized trial. Between February 2021 and February 2025, 140 patients were enrolled. After excluding 11 patients, 129 were included in the final analysis. The primary endpoint was the absence of new neurological deficits, defined as no shift in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of any stroke. RESULTS: At the 30-day follow-up, 66 patients (98.5%) in the MAPT group and 59 patients (95.2%) in the DAPT group showed no new neurological deficits. With a predefined non-inferiority margin of 5%, the difference of 3.35% confirmed the non-inferiority of MAPT compared with DAPT (p=0.002). The incidence of any stroke was 4/67 (5.9%) in the MAPT group and 6/62 (9.6%) in the DAPT group (p=0.431). CONCLUSION: Prasugrel monotherapy for the treatment of distal IAs using the p48 MW HPC was non-inferior to DAPT within the first 30 days following treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-3q9zb73. UTN code: U1111-1290-2489. Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital das Clínicas de Ribeirão Preto - Universidade de São Paulo. CAAE number: 29848720.0.1001.5440.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A two-center randomized clinical superiority trial of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: SASSY study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass is a novel metabolic bariatric surgery intended to enhance metabolic outcomes and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. Although preliminary outcome data for single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass are promising, evidence from adequately powered, randomized head-to-head comparisons is scarce. This trial compares the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in patients with class II obesity (body mass index = 35.0-39.9 kg/m²) with at least one obesity‑related comorbidity or class III obesity (body mass index ⩾40.0 kg/m²). METHODS: This two-center randomized clinical superiority trial enrolls patients eligible for metabolic bariatric surgery at two specialized Norwegian centers. Included patients are randomly assigned (1:1) to either single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass or sleeve gastrectomy with standardized perioperative treatment and care. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in change in body mass index from baseline to 2 years after single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy. Secondary endpoints include additional weight loss outcomes, the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, surgical and postoperative complications, obesity-related comorbidities, nutritional status, bone mineral density, gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, and rates of revisional and conversion surgery. All endpoints will be evaluated at 2 and 5 years after surgery. Statistical analyses utilize linear mixed models and analysis of covariance within an intention-to-treat framework. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide high-level evidence with robust and comparative outcome data on single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, aiming to clarify the clinical utility of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass and inform surgical practice. Findings will address gaps in medium- and long-term evidence regarding weight loss, safety, comorbidity resolution, and quality of life following single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comparison of a Modified Regimen of Prophylactic Phenylephrine Boluses Versus Variable Rate Infusion During Elective Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Noninferiority Randomized Double-Blind Study.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic phenylephrine boluses have been found to be as effective as variable rate infusions during elective cesarean delivery but require a higher number of physician interventions to maintain blood pressure near baseline values. Therefore, there is a need to find a feasible regimen of bolus administration that is equally efficacious to the infusion regimen while at the same time requires a comparable number of physician interventions and is thus non-inferior to the infusion regimen. METHODS: Healthy pregnant women with term, uncomplicated, singleton pregnancies undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups. The Bolus group received a phenylephrine bolus 100 μg immediately after spinal anesthesia and then at every systolic blood pressure value <90% of the baseline. The infusion group received a prophylactic variable-rate infusion of phenylephrine beginning at 50 μg/min and titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure at 90-99% of baseline. The primary outcome was the number of physician interventions needed to maintain the target systolic blood pressure; the secondary outcomes included phenylephrine requirements, incidence of hypotension/hypertension/bradycardia, umbilical arterial and venous blood gas analysis, Apgar scores, and maternal complications. The primary outcome was analyzed in terms of non-inferiority using a non-inferiority margin of two interventions. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included in the study. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) number of physician interventions was 6 (5-8) in the infusion group and 3 (2-4) in the bolus group (P < .001). The difference of medians (95% confidence interval [CI]) between the two groups was -3 (-4 to -2). Phenylephrine requirements were higher in the infusion group (630 [426-765] μg) compared to the bolus group (300 [200-400] μg; P < .001). Blood pressure was higher at certain time points in the infusion group, but overall accuracy of blood pressure control was not different between the groups. Incidence of hypotension, hypertension, and bradycardia, neonatal outcomes, and maternal complications did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The modified regimen of prophylactic boluses is non-inferior to variable rate prophylactic phenylephrine infusion in terms of physician interventions needed to maintain systolic blood pressure within the target range and maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Craniotomy versus Endoscopic Membranectomy in the Treatment of Non-Homogeneous Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Pilot Randomized Parallel-Group Active-Controlled Trial (EMiT CSDH 2).

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a prevalent neurosurgical condition with persistent challenges related to recurrence. Endoscopic membranectomy (EM) has shown promising results in managing symptomatic non-homogenous (SNH)-CSDH, but comparative evidence against craniotomy with membranectomy (CM) is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of EM versus CM in managing SNH-CSDH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pilot randomized parallel-group active-controlled open- labeled superiority trial from September 2023 to November 2024 at Government Kilpauk Medical College, Chennai, India. Sixty patients with SNH-CSDH were randomized into EM and CM groups. Recurrence was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included operative time, complications, radiological indices, pain, hospital stay, and functional recovery. All patients were followed for six months. RESULTS: No recurrence was observed in either group at six months. Two CM patients required reoperation on postoperative day one ( P = 0.15). EM was associated with shorter operative time ( P = 0.02), lower incidence of post-operative subdural residual fluid ( P = 0.015), better early hematoma reduction/subdural space reduction index ( P = 0.008), midline shift/symmetry improvement index ( P = 0.001), and lesser surgical site swelling ( P < 0.001). All patients were ambulant and had a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) 15 at discharge and at six months (including reoperated patients). Pain scores and functional recovery were comparable. EM patients had shorter hospital stays ( P = 0.004) and no significant complications. CONCLUSION: EM demonstrated favorable early radiological outcomes, fewer complications, and comparable functional recovery and recurrence versus CM in SNH-CSDH. Independent reproduction and larger multicentric trials are needed for validity and generalizability.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Pedagogical Efficacy of LLM-Generated Synthetic Data Versus Real-World Clinical Records: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.

BACKGROUND: Expert-reviewed clinical cases generated by large language models (LLMs) may supplement case resources in medical education, but their short-term educational performance relative to real-case-derived teaching materials remains uncertain. We compared immediate post-training test performance after teaching with the two types of case materials and assessed non-inferiority against a prespecified margin. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, parallel-group, randomized non-inferiority trial. Through the Wenjuanxing online platform, participants were randomized 1:1 to learn with either real-case-derived teaching cases compiled by clinicians and reviewed by experts or AI-generated clinical cases produced by Gemini 3.0 Pro from fully de-identified matched real cases and reviewed by three senior general surgery specialists with full-professor rank. The primary outcome was the total score on an independent 10-item immediate post-training test (0-10 points), with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of -0.5 points. Secondary outcomes included the training-phase performance score, learning efficiency index, single-item mental effort rating, case realism, and case-source judgment. RESULTS: A total of 403 participants were randomized, of whom 386 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis: 192 in the real-case group and 194 in the AI-generated case group. The mean post-training test score was 4.95 (SD, 3.35) in the real-case group and 4.61 (SD, 3.35) in the AI-generated case group. The mean difference (AI-generated minus real-case group) was -0.335 points (95% CI, -1.006 to 0.337). Because the lower bound of the confidence interval was below the prespecified non-inferiority margin of -0.5 points, non-inferiority was not demonstrated (one-sided P = 0.314). No significant between-group differences were observed in the training-phase performance score, learning efficiency index, or single-item mental effort rating. AI-generated cases received lower realism ratings for Level 3 cases. The proportion of participants with at least one high-confidence completely incorrect response was 1.6% in the real-case group and 2.1% in the AI-generated case group. CONCLUSIONS: In this short-term, text-based online case-learning setting, no statistically significant between-group difference was observed in immediate post-training test performance; however, non-inferiority of AI-generated clinical cases relative to real-case-derived teaching materials was not demonstrated.

Humans↗

PubMed1992

General issues in efficacy, equivalency, and superiority trials: clinical considerations.

The design of clinical trials aimed at treating different types of periodontal diseases must take into account the prevalence of the disease in the population and the relationship of various descriptors, which may vary from disease to disease. For screening purposes, patients should be selected with disease in the high-severity range, in order to maximize the likelihood of detecting a therapeutic effect. Subsequent trials may be designed around a more representative group of subjects. Therapies must be evaluated on the basis of actual clinical changes, rather than their effect on presumed etiologic factors. The observed changes must be of clinical as well as statistical significance. The distribution of periodontal diseases within a dentition may affect as few as one or as many as over one hundred sites. Strategies are needed to correlate events observed at sites within the dentition, i.e. tooth surface-based measurements or scores, with events that are subject-based, e.g. concentration of blood or salivary components.

Dental Plaque↗

PubMed2026

Quality-of-life assessment in the randomized JBCRG-M06/EMERALD study of eribulin plus dual HER2 blockade in HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although taxanes are a mainstay treatment for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (LABC/MBC), they often impair quality of life (QoL). Treatments that avoid taxane-related QoL deteriorations would be valuable. METHODS: The JBCRG-M06/EMERALD trial (NCT03264547, UMIN000027938) compared eribulin with a taxane, each combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab, in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive LABC/MBC. QoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Module C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) version 3.0. QoL deterioration was defined as a decrease in the Global Health Status (GHS) score by ≥ 10 points (minimum clinically important difference), disease progression, or death. RESULTS: QoL data were available for 210 (of 224 randomized) and 205 (of 222 randomized) patients in the eribulin and taxane groups, respectively. The median (95% confidence interval) time to QoL deterioration was 7.16 (6.28-8.34) months in the eribulin group versus 4.57 (4.17-6.14) months in the taxane group, with a hazard ratio of 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.65-0.98; log-rank P = 0.08). QoL was maintained at 6 and 12 months in greater proportions of the eribulin group (62.7% and 30.5%) compared with the taxane group (43.5% and 25.5%). GHS scores remained stable over time in the eribulin group. GHS deteriorated between weeks 9 and 27 in the taxane group (i.e. during treatment) with subsequent recovery toward baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Eribulin could help avoid the early deteriorations in QoL that occur during taxane therapy and maintain QoL for longer in patents with HER2-positive LABC/MBC receiving trastuzumab and pertuzumab.

Adult↗