PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Expert opinion”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Expert opinion elicitation for assisting deep learning based Lyme disease classifier with patient data.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing erythema migrans (EM) skin lesion, the most common early symptom of Lyme disease, using deep learning techniques can be effective to prevent long-term complications. Existing works on deep learning based EM recognition only utilizes lesion image due to the lack of a dataset of Lyme disease related images with associated patient data. Doctors rely on patient information about the background of the skin lesion to confirm their diagnosis. To assist deep learning model with a probability score calculated from patient data, this study elicited opinions from fifteen expert doctors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first expert elicitation work to calculate Lyme disease probability from patient data. METHODS: For the elicitation process, a questionnaire with questions and possible answers related to EM was prepared. Doctors provided relative weights to different answers to the questions. We converted doctors' evaluations to probability scores using Gaussian mixture based density estimation. We exploited formal concept analysis and decision tree for elicited model validation and explanation. We also proposed an algorithm for combining independent probability estimates from multiple modalities, such as merging the EM probability score from a deep learning image classifier with the elicited score from patient data. RESULTS: We successfully elicited opinions from fifteen expert doctors to create a model for obtaining EM probability scores from patient data. CONCLUSIONS: The elicited probability score and the proposed algorithm can be utilized to make image based deep learning Lyme disease pre-scanners robust. The proposed elicitation and validation process is easy for doctors to follow and can help address related medical diagnosis problems where it is challenging to collect patient data.

Humans

[The forensic-psychiatric expert opinion on offenders under the influence of alcohol. Structure and problems].

The authors recommend and comment on the following structure for forensic-psychiatric expert opinion on offenders under the influence of alcohol. (I) Statement as to the presence of psychopathological impairment apart from acute intoxication, and, if present, what impairment. (II) Assessment of the actual impairment due to intoxication at the time of the offence. (III) The interaction of the factors set out in (I) and (II). (IV) Assessment of personal responsibility for the state of intoxication.

Alcoholic Intoxication

[Expert opinion on headache after accidents (author's transl)].

If a patient suffers headaches as a result of cranial trauma, the medical expert must first of all clear up the cause of these subjective complaints. A precise diagnosis of the primary lesion and possible posttraumatic complications is a prerequisite. The differential diagnosis must take into consideration non-traumatic diseases which are also associated with headache. In the majority of cases, non-traumatic factors such as a low level of intelligence, hysterical, hypochondriacal and psychopathic personality structures and the particular conditions of the accident give rise to the development of persistent headaches after cranial injury. Difficulties in estimating the duration of headache due to trauma for the purposes of private accident insurance are pointed out and finally questions of impaired healing conditions (delayed recompensation) and "psychic" pain are dealt with.

Craniocerebral Trauma

[Results of blood group evaluations in terms of expert opinion in disputes over paternity].

The author evaluates the results of control blood group estimations in the sense of supreme expertise in paternity cases as performed during 7966 through 1974. As ensues from the analysis, the percentage of unconfirmed eliminating conclusions remains to be high, i. e. 5,5%. Different findings as occurring in various group systems have been encountered in 284 cases. Therefore revision of eliminating couclusions cannot be abandoned.

Blood Group Antigens