PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Ezetimibe, Simvastatin Drug Combination”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Ezetimibe + simvastatin (Merck/Schering-Plough).

Merck/Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals has developed and launched ezetimibe + simvastatin (Vytorin), a fixed combination tablet of Schering-Plough's cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimebe (Zetia), and Merck's HMG CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin (Zocor), for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. The drug had been launched in Germany and Mexico by April 2004, and, in July 2004, was approved in the US, with expected launch late in 2004.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Effect of ezetimibe and/or simvastatin on coenzyme Q10 levels in plasma: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors ('statins') have been associated with a decrease in ubidecarenone (ubiquinone) levels, a lipophilic enzyme also known as coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), due to inhibition of mevalonate synthesis. There is speculation that a decrease in CoQ10 levels may be associated with statin-induced myopathy. The cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe increases endogenous cholesterol synthesis. The purpose of this study was to examine (i) the effects of ezetimibe and simvastatin on plasma CoQ10 levels and (ii) whether ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin abrogates the suggested statin-induced decrease in the CoQ10 plasma levels. METHODS: Seventy-two healthy male subjects were enrolled in a single-centre, randomised, parallel-group study with three arms. Subjects received ezetimibe 10 mg/day, simvastatin 40 mg/day or the combination of ezetimibe 10 mg/day plus simvastatin 40 mg/day for 14 days. RESULTS: Baseline CoQ10 (0.99 +/- 0.30 mg/L) levels for the combined groups remained unchanged in the ezetimibe group (0.95 +/- 0.24 mg/L), and significantly decreased in the simvastatin and combination groups (0.82 +/- 0.18 mg/L, p = 0.0002 and 0.7 +/- 0.22 mg/L, p < 0.0001, respectively). There was a correlation between the percentage change in the levels of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and the percentage change in CoQ10 levels in all treatment groups (correlation coefficient [R] = 0.67, p < 0.0001). The ratios of CoQ10 levels to LDL-C levels were significantly increased in all treatment groups (p < 0.0001). CoQ10 level was independent of cholesterol synthesis or absorption markers. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin and the combination of simvastatin and ezetimibe significantly decrease plasma CoQ10 levels whereas ezetimibe monotherapy does not. There is a significant correlation between the CoQ10 level decrease and the decrease in total and LDL-C levels in all three treatment groups, suggesting that the CoQ10 decrease may reflect the decrease in the levels of its lipoprotein carriers and might not be statin-specific. The statin-associated CoQ10 reduction is not abrogated through ezetimibe coadministration. Changes of CoQ10 levels are independent of cholesterol synthesis and absorption.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Lipid-altering efficacy of the ezetimibe/simvastatin single tablet versus rosuvastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the lipid-altering efficacy and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin single tablet product compared with rosuvastatin at the approved usual starting, next highest, and maximum doses. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Double-blind, multicenter, 6-week, parallel-group study in hypercholesterolemic patients (n = 2959). Patients were randomized based on stratification by low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to ezetimibe/simvastatin or rosuvastatin, respectively, at the usual starting (10/20 or 10 mg/day), the next highest (10/40 or 20 mg/day), and maximum doses (10/80 or 40 mg/day). RESULTS: At all doses and across doses, ezetimibe/simvastatin reduced LDL-C levels significantly more (52-61%) than rosuvastatin (46-57%; p < or = 0.001). Significantly greater percentages of all patients (p < 0.001) and high risk patients (p < or = 0.005) attained LDL-C levels < 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) following ezetimibe/simvastatin treatment compared with rosuvastatin at the prespecified doses and across doses. Ezetimibe/simvastatin also produced significantly greater reductions in total cholesterol (p < 0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.001), lipid ratios (p < or = 0.003), and apolipoprotein B (p < 0.05). Reductions in triglycerides were significantly greater with ezetimibe/simvastatin than rosuvastatin at the usual starting (p = 0.004) and next highest (p = 0.006) doses, and across all doses (p < 0.001). Increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and decreases in high sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) were similar between treatment groups. Safety profiles were comparable for both treatments; however, the percent of patients with proteinuria was significantly higher following rosuvastatin treatment than ezetimibe/simvastatin, respectively at 10 mg versus 10/20 mg/day (p = 0.004) and 40 mg versus 10/80 mg/day (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Ezetimibe/simvastatin was more effective than rosuvastatin in LDL-C lowering, and provided greater or comparable improvements in other lipid measures and hsCRP at the approved usual starting, next highest, and maximum doses in hypercholesterolemic patients. Although the doses compared in this study were not equivalent on a milligram basis, the results provide clinically relevant information regarding the use of these drugs for initial therapy and for subsequent use at higher doses when appropriate. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated; however, this study was not powered nor of sufficient duration to assess the prevalence of rare clinical adverse effects. Overall, ezetimibe/simvastatin offers an effective and tolerable treatment option for lipid management. An assessment of its full clinical benefit awaits evaluation in longer-term clinical studies.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed2006

Ezetimibe/simvastatin single tablet versus rosuvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Recent guidelines recommend strict goals for low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (70-100 mg/dL; 1.8-2.6 mmol/L). These goals were set following the publication of several trials. In the current issue of the journal, a study compares different doses of the combination tablet (ezetimibe/simvastatin) with statin monotherapy (rosuvastatin). In keeping with previous literature, the combination therapy was more effective in achieving LDL-C goals. This editorial comments on the potential disadvantages of using monotherapy with high-dose statins and considers the issue of statin-induced proteinuria. Combination therapy may need to be increasingly used to achieve the LDL-C targets set by recent guidelines.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Striated muscle safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin (Vytorin).

Despite the excellent benefit/risk profile of statins, their use is limited by a dose-related risk of adverse events, particularly those related to muscle toxicity. Ezetimibe/simvastatin (Vytorin) is a cholesterol-lowering therapy that inhibits the intestinal absorption (ezetimibe) and synthesis (simvastatin) of cholesterol. This analysis compared the muscle safety profiles of ezetimibe/simvastatin and simvastatin monotherapy. We reviewed muscle-related adverse event (AE) data from 17 randomized, blinded clinical trials (13 base and 4 extension studies), in which ezetimibe and simvastatin were either co-administered as separate entities or given as a combination tablet to 4,558 patients. The following AE categories were summarized: incidence of musculoskeletal or connective-tissue AEs (all and drug related); discontinuations due to musculoskeletal or connective-tissue AEs (all and drug related); incidence of AEs reported under the term "myalgia" (all and drug related); discontinuation due to myalgia (all and drug related); incidence of "myopathy" (all and drug related); increases in creatine kinase to 3 to < 5, 5 to < 10, and > or = 10 times the upper limit of normal. For all AE categories examined, the incidence of muscle-related clinical and laboratory AEs or discontinuations due to muscle-related AEs was no more common in patients taking ezetimibe/simvastatin than in those taking simvastatin alone. Thus, the clinical trial experience with ezetimibe/simvastatin suggests that ezetimibe does not enhance or aggravate the muscle effects of simvastatin.

Azetidines↗
PubMed2007

The effect of simvastatin, ezetimibe and their combination on the lipid profile, arterial stiffness and inflammatory markers.

OBJECTIVE: Arterial stiffness and highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) serum level predict the risk for cardiovascular events. The most commonly used drugs for lowering cholesterol levels, the statins, also have anti-inflammatory effects and can decrease arterial stiffness. Ezetimibe is the first drug of a new class of cholesterol absorption inhibitors in common use and, to date, its effect on arterial stiffness has not yet been studied. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of simvastatin and ezetimibe, both singly and in combination, on arterial stiffness and hsCRP serum concentration in hypercholesterolemic patients. METHODS: Forty hypercholesterolemic patients were studied. Group1 comprised previously untreated patients, who received simvastatin at doses of 40 mg/day during the study; group 2 comprised patients previously treated with simvastatin at 40 mg/day, who received simvastatin at 80 mg/day during the study; group 3 consisted of patients previously untreated, who received ezetimibe at doses of 10 mg/day during the study; group 4 comprised patients previously treated with simvastatin at 40 mg/day, who received simvastatin at 40 mg/day and ezetimibe at 10 mg/day during the study. Arterial stiffness expressed as the Augmentation Index (AIx) (assessed by pulse wave analysis), the lipid profile and the hsCRP level were measured at baseline and after 3 months of treatment. RESULTS: The reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) after treatment was significantly greater in groups 1 and 4 (39.9 and 35.7%) than in groups 2 and 3 (17.7 and 16.9%; p = 0.005). The AIx decreased significantly only in group 1 patients, from 30.2 +/- 8.3% before treatment to 21.6 +/- 6.5% after treatment (p < 0.001). Changes in hsCRP paralleled the changes in AIx, with a significant decrease in patients in group 1 only, from 2.8 +/- 2.5 mg/L before treatment to 1.6 +/- 1.5 mg/L after treatment (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Ezetimibe as a monotherapy had no effect on arterial stiffness or hsCRP, while the administration of simvastatin at 40 mg per day improved arterial stiffness and CRP. However, increasing the dose of simvastatin or administering ezetimibe in combination with simvastatin had no beneficial effects on arterial stiffness.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Simvastatin plus ezetimibe: combination therapy for the management of dyslipidaemia.

Hyperlipidaemia is a pivotal risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic disease. A large number of studies have demonstrated that the treatment of abnormalities in lipoprotein levels reduces the risk for myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, carotid artery disease, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality. Despite the development of multiple drug classes to treat dyslipidaemias and the promulgation of clearly defined guidelines for the management of lipid disorders, dyslipidaemia tends to be undertreated in the majority of patients at risk for cardiovascular disease. A part of the reluctance to treat different lipoprotein fractions to goal levels is attributable to physician- and patient-related concerns over the increasing toxicity of available therapies, as their dosages are increased. The risks of hepatotoxicity, myalgia, and rhabdomyolysis are fairly well characterised in patients receiving statins, fibrates and niacin. Another issue affecting treatment success rates is the fact that many patients with complex dyslipidaemias are inadequately responsive to single-agent therapy. As the epidemics of obesity, metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus continue to worsen, physicians will encounter severe, mixed dyslipidaemias more frequently. Many of these patients will require combinations of drugs to address the various metabolic derangements causing changes in multiple lipoprotein fractions. Although the need for combination therapy is well-established in the management of disorders, such as hypertension and diabetes, it is less often used for the treatment of dyslipidaemias. The development of safe, cost-effective, and efficacious combination dyslipidaemic therapy is an important goal in cardiovascular medicine. Simvastatin plus ezetimibe has recently been combined as a fixed dose therapy, which offers clinicians the opportunity to simultaneously inhibit two key pathways in cholesterol metabolism: hepatic cholesterol biosynthesis and the absorption of cholesterol at the level of the proximal jejunum. This dual mechanism of inhibition substantially increases the capacity to decrease serum levels of atherogenic low-density lipoproteins and increase high-density lipoprotein, compared with that observed when either drug is used alone. This combination increases the likelihood of therapeutic success in patients with dyslipidaemia.

Azetidines↗
PubMed2002

Pharmacodynamic interaction between the new selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe and simvastatin.

AIMS: The primary aims of these two single-centre, randomized, evaluator-blind, placebo/positive-controlled, parallel-group studies were to evaluate the potential for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe 0.25, 1, or 10 mg and simvastatin 10 mg (Study 1), and a pharmacodynamic interaction between ezetimibe 10 mg and simvastatin 20 mg (Study 2). Evaluation of the tolerance of the coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin was a secondary objective. METHODS: Eighty-two healthy men with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >or=130 mg dl-1 received study drug once daily in the morning for 14 days. In Study 1 (n=58), five groups of 11-12 subjects received simvastatin 10 mg alone, or with ezetimibe 0.25, 1, or 10 mg or placebo. In Study 2 (n=24), three groups of eight subjects received simvastatin 20 mg alone, ezetimibe 10 mg alone, or the combination. Blood samples were collected to measure serum lipids in both studies. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and its beta-hydroxy metabolite were evaluated in Study 1 only. RESULTS: In both studies, reported side-effects were generally mild, nonspecific, and similar among treatment groups. In Study 1, there were no indications of pharmacokinetic interactions between simvastatin and ezetimibe. All active treatments caused statistically significant (P<0.01) decreases in LDL-C concentration vs placebo from baseline to day 14. The coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin caused a dose-dependent reduction in LDL-C and total cholesterol, with no apparent effect on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) or triglycerides. The coadministration of ezetimibe 10 mg and simvastatin 10 mg or 20 mg caused a statistically (P<0.01) greater percentage reduction (mean -17%, 95% CI -27.7, -6.2, and -18%, -28.4, -7.4, respectively) in LDL-C than simvastatin alone. CONCLUSIONS: The coadministration of ezetimibe at doses up to 10 mg with simvastatin 10 or 20 mg daily was well tolerated and caused a significant additive reduction in LDL-C compared with simvastatin alone. Additional clinical studies to assess the efficacy and safety of coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin are warranted.

Administration, Oral↗