PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “FDI criteria”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Clinical performance evaluation of single-shade versus multi-shade composite resins in non-carious cervical lesions: a 36-month randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Composite resins are widely used as the material of choice for definitive restorations due to their ability to integrate functional and aesthetic aspects in dental rehabilitation. Recently, one-shade composite resins have been introduced to simplify the clinical workflow. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of a "chameleon effect" composite resin with that of a multi-shade composite resin in non-carious cervical lesions after 36 months of follow-up. METHODS: This study was a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with an equivalence design using a split-mouth approach. The sample consisted of 60 patients presenting at least two non-carious cervical lesions, totaling 120 restorations. Restorations were performed using two materials from the same commercial brand: Vittra Unique (one-shade group) and Vittra APS (multi-shade group). The clinical performance of the restorations was longitudinally evaluated according to the FDI criteria. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test, while other clinical parameters were compared using the chi-square test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: At baseline, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the evaluated biological, functional, and aesthetic parameters (p > 0.05). Both materials demonstrated clinically acceptable performance according to the FDI criteria, with no significant differences between them. CONCLUSIONS: After 36 months, no significant differences were observed between the one-shade and the multi-shade composite resins in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This 36-month randomized clinical trial demonstrates that single-shade composite resins achieve structural durability and aesthetic integration equivalent to traditional multi-shade layering when restoring non-carious cervical lesions. This evidence validates a simplified, single-shade restorative workflow, significantly reducing chairside time and operator-dependent variables without compromising the clinical longevity.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Versus Incremental Composite Placement Approaches in Vital Posterior Teeth: A 24 Months Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Composite resin placement technique may influence marginal integrity, polymerization stress distribution, and long-term clinical performance of posterior restorations. This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the 24-month clinical performance of four different placement techniques in Class I posterior composite restorations. METHODS: Fifty patients aged 20-35&#x2009;years presenting with four occlusal carious lesions each were enrolled, resulting in 200 restorations. Cavities (4-5&#x2009;mm depth) were prepared according to caries extension. Restorations were randomly allocated into four equal groups (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;50) according to placement technique: stamp technique, snowplow technique, modified incremental "pizza" technique, and bulk-fill technique. All materials were applied following manufacturers' instructions. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline and after 6, 12, and 24&#x2009;months using FDI criteria. Functional (fracture/retention, marginal adaptation), esthetic (marginal staining, anatomical form), and biological (postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries) properties were assessed by two calibrated evaluators. Statistical analysis was performed at a significance level of &#x3b1;&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with a total of 152 restorations were evaluated at the end of the 24&#x2009;months in line with FDI at the end of the study with 76% recall rates. No statistically significant differences were observed among groups regarding fracture/retention or secondary caries (p&#x2009;>&#x2009;0.05). Marginal adaptation and marginal staining demonstrated minor deterioration over time across all groups, with statistically significant intergroup differences found (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05). Postoperative sensitivity was minimal and transient in all groups with no significant difference (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.181). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this 24-month follow-up, the four placement techniques demonstrated comparable clinical performance in Class I posterior composite restorations. Selection of technique may therefore be guided by clinical preference and procedural efficiency rather than differences in short-term clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07415317.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Clinical performance of two lithium disilicate CAD/CAM materials in posterior Class II inlay restorations: A 48-month randomised split-mouth clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical performance of Amber Mill (AM) and IPS e.max CAD (EM) lithium disilicate computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials in posterior Class II inlay restorations and characterise their baseline properties. METHODS: Thirty-four adults received paired AM and EM posterior Class II inlays (68 restorations) in a triple-blind randomised split-mouth trial followed for 48 months. Restorations were evaluated at baseline and annually using revised World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria, with fracture and retention as the primary endpoint. Baseline characterisation included flexural strength, shear bond strength, translucency parameter, and scanning electron microscopy. McNemar, Wilcoxon signed-rank, Friedman, one-way analysis of variance, Tukey post hoc, and inter-rater agreement analyses were used. RESULTS: At 48 months, 18 paired participants were available for primary analysis. Failures occurred in 2 of 18 AM restorations and in 3 of 18 EM restorations, corresponding to success rates of 88.9% and 83.3%, respectively, with no significant between-material difference (McNemar p = 1.000). No catastrophic bulk ceramic fracture was observed. Secondary FDI scores remained mostly within the clinically acceptable range; marginal staining deteriorated over time in both groups (p < .001) without significant between-material differences. Baseline material testing showed significant material- and translucency-dependent differences in flexural strength, shear bond strength, and translucency. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the 48-month follow-up and the tested Class II inlay indication, AM showed clinical performance comparable to EM. Observed clinical complications were related to retention or marginal/interface behaviour. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: For posterior Class II lithium disilicate CAD/CAM inlays, medium-term complications were mainly retention/interface-related, suggesting adhesive-interface durability may be as important as baseline ceramic strength.

Humans↗
PubMed1976

[The possibility of a standardization of clinical trials concerning materials for root canal obturation].

Clinical trials constitute epidemiologic experiments, in comparable groups of human populations designed to assess the preventive of curative effects of agents or measures. International organizations (FDI, WHO, CIOMS, ISO) have been instrumental in creating uniform methods, so that the findings from different sources can be validly compared. The need for a standardization of clinical trials in dentistry is particularly felt: - by the dental profession in order to make the choice of materials with the best clinically proven qualities - by the manufacturers in order to develop materials of improved clinical quality - by the public health administrators (or social security agencies), in order to either evaluate the benefit of instituted preventive and curative measure or to ascertain the best possible services A centennial history of efforts is shown to have resulted today in a broad international understanding (Table III). 1. The first chapter of this paper presents a review of the principal requirements for controlled clinical trails [8] such as officially adopted by FDI (Table V). 2. The second chapter offers a first-hand apercu of impending recommendations proposed by COMIET in two protocols [11] for the uniform conduct and evaluation of clinical trials of restorative techniques and materials. 2.1 Three standardized forms (A, B: Table IX, and C) serve to uniformly record data of the operative procedures. 2.2 The proposed standardized criteria (Tables X, XI) for the clinical appraisal of distinct materials give the advantage of having been tested already very extensively. 3. A critical review of the proposed protocols [11] reveals the necessity of: 3.1 referring to and coordinating with the already adopted principal requirements for controlled clinical trials. 3.2 generally adopting the excellent guidelines for the conduct of the study and the evaluation of observations (Tables X, XI) 3.3 taking advantage of the possibilities for reducing the recommended sample of 100 paired restorations (200 cavities)--difficult to implement in many countries--by certain measure such as preliminary in-vitro experiments, consideration of results already reported in the literature and a more systematic use of a standardized photographic serial documentation, a topic which will be the object of an ensuing paper.

International Cooperation↗