PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Fees and Charges”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Methods of charging and the fees charged for dental hygiene services in traditional and nontraditional settings.

The information presented in this paper was obtained as part of an ongoing longitudinal study of 1982 dental hygiene graduates. This portion of the study was contracted by the American Dental Hygienists' Association and investigated the methods of charging for dental hygiene services and the fees charged for these services. In September 1986, mail questionnaires were sent to a cohort of 1,008 dental hygienists who graduated in 1982. Responses were received from 766 subjects--a 76% response rate overall and a 77% response rate from subjects with valid addresses and who had received the questionnaires. Data were analyzed for clinical dental hygienists in traditional and nontraditional settings. Results showed that the methods of charging for services and the fees charged were similar in both settings. Although most hygienists provided many services, only one fee for these services was charged in most settings. The mean prophylaxis fee for child patients at traditional settings was $23.52, and $23.38 at nontraditional settings. The mean prophylaxis fee for adult patients at traditional settings was $31.23, and $32.61 at nontraditional settings.

Adult↗

Survey of dental fees charged by dentists in Singapore.

A survey on dental fees was conducted among all private dental clinics registered with the Medical Audit and Accreditation Unit of the Ministry of Health in Singapore. Replies were received from 74 dental clinics. Analysis of results showed that there was a general increase in the median of fees charged in 1998 compared to the fees listed in the Minimum Fee Schedule issued by the Singapore Dental Association in 1994. 93% of the respondents indicated that there is a need to revise the Minimum Fee Schedule.

Fee Schedules↗

Fees charged to a consulting population in general practice.

OBJECTIVES: information generated by the computer systems of thirty-five general practitioners was examined to determine their fee structure during the study period. METHODS: copies of the general medical services (GMS) claims and patient fees were examined to determine whether patients had been charged the doctor's regular fee or an amount greater or less than this. RESULTS: information on 97,869 consultations was collected. A regular fee was charged to patients in 47% of cases, a greater or less than normal fee was charged in 7.5% of the consultations, and no fee to the patient was made in 22.5% of cases. Consultations charged to the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) comprised 17.5% of the study data. Maternity cases comprised the remaining 5.5%. Nineteen doctors provided information on 6511 out of hours or home visit consultations. In 44.3% of these cases no charge was made to the patient. This proportion was higher among beneficiaries (58.9%) than for any other group. CONCLUSION: all of the contributing doctors appear to exercise discretion in their charging policies rather than to maintain a rigid pricing structure for their services.

Adult↗