SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Fluvastatin”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Influence of CYP2C9 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics and cholesterol-lowering activity of (-)-3S,5R-fluvastatin and (+)-3R,5S-fluvastatin in healthy volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: In vitro data indicate that biotransformation of the synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor fluvastatin is catalyzed by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme 2C9. The consequences of CYP2C9 genetic polymorphisms on fluvastatin pharmacokinetics and on its efficacy have not been investigated in humans thus far. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy heterozygous or homozygous carriers of the CYP2C9 variants Arg144Cys (*2) and Ile359Leu (*3) and 2 individuals with the deficient CYP2D6 genotype *4/*4 took 40 mg racemic fluvastatin daily for 14 days. All subjects had also been genotyped for CYP2C8, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 polymorphisms. Pharmacokinetics was analyzed after the first fluvastatin administration. Serum lipid concentrations were measured before fluvastatin intake and on day 15. Plasma concentrations of (+)-3R,5S-fluvastatin and of (-)-3S,5R-fluvastatin were quantified by enantiospecific HPLC. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics of both enantiomers showed statistically significant differences according to the number of CYP2C9*3 alleles (P <.0001, F test). Mean (and SD) values for area under the curve of the active (+)-3R,5S-fluvastatin in carriers of the genotype CYP2C9*1/*1, *1/*3, and *3/*3 were 173 (85) micro g. L(-1). h, 231 (85) micro g. L(-1). h, and 533 (120) micro g. L(-1). h, respectively. The corresponding values for area under the curve of (-)-3S,5R-fluvastatin were 227 (133) micro g. L(-1). h, 360 (103) micro g. L(-1). h, and 1126 (311) micro g. L(-1). h for CYP2C9*1/*1, *1/*3, and *3/*3, respectively. The CYP2C9*2 variant did not have any significant influence on fluvastatin kinetics, nor did the CYP2C8*3 allele, which was tightly linked with CYP2C9*2. Total serum cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations decreased significantly during the 14-day treatment period (P <.001), but no correlation with the CYP2C9 genotype was found. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of both enantiomers of fluvastatin depended on the CYP2C9 genotype, with a 3-fold group mean difference in the active enantiomer and even greater differences in the inactive enantiomer, but differences in plasma concentrations were not reflected in cholesterol lowering after 14 days of fluvastatin intake in healthy volunteers.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of fluvastatin for prevention of restenosis after successful coronary balloon angioplasty; final results of the fluvastatin angiographic restenosis (FLARE) trial.

BACKGROUND: The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors competitively inhibit biosynthesis of mevalonate, a precursor of non-sterol compounds involved in cell proliferation. Experimental evidence suggests that fluvastatin may, independent of any lipid lowering action, exert a greater direct inhibitory effect on proliferating vascular myocytes than other statins. The FLARE (Fluvastatin Angioplasty Restenosis) Trial was conceived to evaluate the ability of fluvastatin 40 mg twice daily to reduce restenosis after successful coronary balloon angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS: Patients were randomized to either placebo or fluvastatin 40 mg twice daily beginning 2-4 weeks prior to planned PTCA and continuing after a successful PTCA (without the use of a stent), to follow-up angiography at 26+/-2 weeks. Clinical follow-up was completed at 40 weeks. The primary end-point was angiographic restenosis, measured by quantitative coronary angiography at a core laboratory, as the loss in minimal luminal diameter during follow-up. Clinical end-points were death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery or re-intervention, up to 40 weeks after PTCA. RESULTS: Of 1054 patients randomized, 526 were allocated to fluvastatin and 528 to placebo. Among these, 409 in the fluvastatin group and 427 in the placebo group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, having undergone a successful PTCA after a minimum of 2 weeks of pre-treatment. At the time of PTCA, fluvastatin had reduced LDL cholesterol by 37% and this was maintained at 33% at 26 weeks. There was no difference in the primary end-point between the treatment groups (fluvastatin 0.23+/-0.49 mm vs placebo 0.23+/-0.52 mm, P=0.95) or in the angiographic restenosis rate (fluvastatin 28%, placebo 31%, chi-square P=0.42), or in the incidence of the composite clinical end-point at 40 weeks (22.4% vs 23.3%; logrank P=0.74). However, a significantly lower incidence of total death and myocardial infarction was observed in six patients (1.4%) in the fluvastatin group and 17 (4.0%) in the placebo group (log rank P=0.025). CONCLUSION: Treatment with fluvastatin 80 mg daily did not affect the process of restenosis and is therefore not indicated for this purpose. However, the observed reduction in mortality and myocardial infarction 40 weeks after PTCA in the fluvastatin treated group has not been previously reported with statin therapy. Accordingly, a priori investigation of this finding is indicated and a new clinical trial with this intention is already underway.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

PubMed2000

Effect of combined fluvastatin-fenofibrate therapy compared with fenofibrate monotherapy in severe primary hypercholesterolemia. French Fluvastatin Study Group.

This double-blind study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of fluvastatin-fenofibrate combination therapy compared with fenofibrate monotherapy in severe primary hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol > or =190 mg/dl [4.9 mmol/L], triglycerides < or =350mg/dl [3.9 mmol/l]). After a 10-week placebo and dietary baseline period, 102 patients were randomized to receive micronized fenofibrate 200 mg, fluvastatin 20 mg plus micronized fenofibrate 200 mg, or fluvastatin 40 mg plus micronized fenofibrate 200 mg. At week 16, fenofibrate 200 mg alone lowered LDL cholesterol from baseline by 21% compared with 32% for fluvastatin 20 mg plus fenofibrate 200 mg and 41% for fluvastatin 40 mg plus fenofibrate 200 mg (p <0.001). Triglycerides decreased by 29% with fenofibrate 200 mg alone, 39% with fluvastatin 20 mg plus fenofibrate 200 mg, and 40% with fluvastatin 40 mg plus fenofibrate 200 mg (p <0.05). Safety was assessed by recording adverse events and measuring clinical laboratory parameters. The adverse event profile was similar for the 3 treatment groups. One patient withdrew due to an increase in transaminase levels. No significant increase in creatine phosphokinase levels was observed with combination therapy. In conclusion, the addition of fluvastatin to micronized fenofibrate results in substantial improvement in atherogenic plasma lipids and is well tolerated.

Aged↗

PubMed1995

Efficacy of fluvastatin, a totally synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor. FLUENT Study Group. Fluvastatin Long-Term Extension Trial.

The Fluvastatin Long-Term Extension Trial (FLUENT) was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of fluvastatin over a prolonged period of time. In this way, FLUENT represents a clinical scenario that is closer to office-based chronic treatment of hyperlipidemic patients. A total of 918 patients with severe primary hypercholesterolemia (mean baseline low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], 227 mg/dL) were enrolled into the study and received open-label fluvastatin, 20 or 40 mg daily, depending on response. Results of the first year of treatment have been published previously and showed statistically significant changes in LDL-C (-30.7%), total cholesterol (-21.9%), and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C; +3.5%). Of the original number of patients completing the 1-year study, 761 completed a second year of evaluation; the results are presented here. Any patient who did not achieve LDL-C levels of < or = 130 mg/dL could receive cholestyramine (usually 8 g/day) or fluvastatin up to 80 mg/day. At the end of the 2-year period there were significant changes in LDL-C with fluvastatin (20 mg/day, -25.4%; 40 mg/day, -30.6%; 80 mg/day, -33.7%; p < 0.001 vs baseline for all values). The combination of fluvastatin and cholestyramine changed LDL-C by -34.6%. Similar dose-response results were seen with reductions in total cholesterol and the LDL-C: HDL-C ratio. There were no unexpected or severe adverse events or laboratory abnormalities. In conclusion, fluvastatin offers a range of LDL-C reduction (25-34%) similar to other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, that conforms with guideline recommendations for over 90% of hypercholesterolemic patients.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Comparison of fluvastatin versus pravastatin treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia. French Fluvastatin Study Group.

Following a 6-week placebo period, 134 patients with low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > or = 160 mg/dL and plasma triglyceride < or = 400 mg/dL, despite following a standard lipid-lowering diet, were randomized to double-blind, double-placebo treatment with fluvastatin (22 women, 46 men; age 21-71 years) or pravastatin (25 women, 41 men; age 19-76 years). Fluvastatin at 40 mg and pravastatin at 20 mg were given for the first 4 weeks, both once daily with the evening meal. For the following 12 weeks, fluvastatin at 40 mg twice daily and pravastatin at 40 mg once daily were given with the evening meal. Both drugs were equally effective in lowering LDL-C after 4 weeks of treatment (-24.0% with fluvastatin, -24.1% with pravastatin) but, after 16 weeks, LDL-C reduction was -30.4% with fluvastatin and -26.6% with pravastatin. This further lowering of LDL-C between week 4 and week 16 was significant (p < 0.001) for fluvastatin but not pravastatin. Adverse events were reported by 23 fluvastatin patients and 22 pravastatin patients: 3 patients in each group withdrew from the study because of these. No notable abnormalities in levels of alanine or aspartate aminotransferase values (defined as > 3 times the upper limit of normal on 2 consecutive occasions) or of creatine phosphokinase (defined as > 10 times the upper limit of normal on any occasion) were observed in either treatment group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Effects of fluvastatin and bezafibrate combination on plasma fibrinogen, t-plasminogen activator inhibitor and C reactive protein levels in coronary artery disease patients with mixed hyperlipidaemia (FACT study). Fluvastatin Alone and in Combination Treatment.

AIM OF THE STUDY: We studied the effects of fluvastatin and bezafibrate in monotherapy and in combination on plasma fibrinogen, t-plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) and C reactive protein (CRP) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and mixed hyperlipidaemia. DESIGN: In this randomised, double blind, multicentre trial 333 patients with stable angina pectoris or previous myocardial infarction or coronary revascularisation and mixed hyperlipidaemia (LDL-cholesterol 135-250 mg/dl and triglycerides (TG) 180-400 mg/dl) were randomised to fluvastatin 40 mg, bezafibrate 400 mg, fluvastatin 20 mg + bezafibrate 400 mg or fluvastatin 40 mg + bezafibrate 400 mg treatments for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Plasma fibrinogen significantly decreased after treatment with the combinations fluvastatin+bezafibrate (-14 and -16%) and with bezafibrate monotherapy (-9%). No significant reduction was observed after fluvastatin monotherapy (-4%). No significant changes were observed in PAI-1 and CRP plasma levels. Combination therapy significantly decreased both LDL-C and TG, and significantly increased HDL-C. CONCLUSIONS: The combined effects on fibrinogen and plasma lipids achieved by fluvastatin and bezafibrate combination treatment might be more useful than the simple reduction of cholesterol in preventing ischaemic cardiovascular disease.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Efficacy and safety of a combination fluvastatin-bezafibrate treatment for familial hypercholesterolemia: comparative analysis with a fluvastatin-cholestyramine combination.

PURPOSE: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) carries a markedly increased risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). Reduction of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to the normal range may prevent premature atherosclerosis and usually requires a combination of cholesterol-lowering drugs. The major objective of this study is to compare two different drug combinations for the treatment of heterozygous FH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The current investigation is a short-term, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of fluvastatin when combined with cholestyramine (group 1) or with bezafibrate (group 2) in 38 patients with heterozygous FH. RESULTS: After 6 weeks of combination treatment, in comparison to a drug-free baseline (patients receiving single-blind placebo during the lead-in period of an earlier study, ie, before ever receiving fluvastatin), the combination of 40 mg/d of fluvastatin with 400 mg/d of bezafibrate in group 2 reduced plasma LDL-C levels by 35% as compared with 32% in group 1, and reduced the LDL-C/high-density cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio by 46%, compared to 37% in group 1 (a non-significant difference for both comparisons). When compared to an intermittent 6-week open-label administration of 40 mg fluvastatin monotherapy, the addition of cholestyramine or bezafibrate each reduced LDL-C by an additional 13% (P < 0.01 for both regimens). CONCLUSIONS: Fluvastatin-bezafibrate is superior to a fluvastatin-cholestyramine combination for lowering serum triglycerides and elevating HDL-C serum levels in patients in conjunction with a significant lowering of LDL-C/HDL-C ratios, and may be an effective synergistic therapy for heterozygous FH. No episodes of myositis were seen in this short-term study, a finding that is in agreement with most of the reported studies on statin-fibrate combinations reviewed here.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Changes in plasma apolipoprotein B-containing lipoparticle levels following therapy with fluvastatin and cholestyramine. European Fluvastatin Study Group.

Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that apolipoprotein (apo) B-containing lipoparticles (LpE:B, LpC-III:B) are associated with the risk of coronary artery disease whereas apo A-1-containing lipoparticles (LpA-I) are protective against coronary artery disease. The effect on lipoparticle levels of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor fluvastatin, in combination with cholestyramine, was assessed in a double-blind randomized study. A total of 144 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia were recruited, who had successfully completed an original study comparing the effects of fluvastatin and cholestyramine on plasma lipoparticle levels. All subjects fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels > 160 mg/dL, with premature coronary artery disease and 2 associated risk factors; or LDL-C > 190 mg/dL, no coronary artery disease, and triglycerides < 300 mg/dL, after a lipid-lowering diet. Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 combination therapy groups: fluvastatin 20 mg/day plus cholestyramine 4 g/day; fluvastatin 20 mg/day plus cholestyramine 8 g/day; and fluvastatin 20 mg/day plus cholestyramine 16 g/day. The study length was 6 weeks and patients were examined at 3-week intervals. Fluvastatin plus cholestyramine produced a significant (p < 0.001), dose-dependent reduction in levels of cholesterol (range, -29 to -34%), LDL-C (range, -30 to -44%), apo B (range, -23 to -34%), and apo E (range, -33 to -43%). LpE:B levels were also reduced (range, -19 to -26%), but not significantly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

PubMed1994

Efficacy of a low dose-range of fluvastatin (XU 62-320) in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia. A dose-response study in 431 patients. The French-Dutch Fluvastatin Study Group.

1. In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the efficacy of four dosages of fluvastatin (2.5, 5, 10 and 20 mg day-1) were assessed in 431 patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia recruited in 17 centres. 2. Following an 8-week dietary stabilisation phase and a 6-week placebo phase, the patients were randomised to receive placebo or fluvastatin 2.5, 5, 10 or 20 mg once daily at night for a period of 6 weeks. 3. Total cholesterol, beta-quant LDL-C, and the beta-quant LDL-C/HDL-C ratio were significantly reduced by all doses of fluvastatin, and HDL-C was significantly increased by the 10 mg and 20 mg doses. Fluvastatin 20 mg day-1 also significantly decreased TG and Lp(a):B levels. 4. Fluvastatin was well tolerated during the study, and relatively few biochemical or haematological abnormalities occurred. 5. Of the dosages tested, 20 mg fluvastatin day-1 is the optimal hypolipidaemic dose.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Fluvastatin reduces levels of plasma apo B-containing particles and increases those of LpA-I. European Fluvastatin Study Group.

Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated an association between apolipoprotein (apo) B-containing particles (lipoprotein [Lp] E:B; LpC-III:B) and an inverse association between LpA-I and the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). The effect of 6 weeks of treatment with fluvastatin (20 and 40 mg/day in the evening), a novel competitive inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, on lipoparticle levels was studied in 423 patients with hypercholesterolemia after 14 weeks of standard dietary therapy. The combined data of the European double-blind controlled studies were used for the analysis. Two independent groups of hypercholesterolemic patients receiving fluvastatin (20 and 40 mg every evening) for 6 weeks were compared with a placebo group. For inclusion, patients had to fulfill the following criteria: plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels > 160 mg/dL and premature CAD and/or two associated risk factors; LDL cholesterol > 190 mg/dL and no CAD; triglycerides < 300 mg/dL. All measurements were performed at the Pasteur Institute Central Laboratory, LpE:B and LpC-III:B were measured by double-site ELISA. Lipoprotein A-I and LpA-I:A-II were determined by differential electroimmunodiffusion. Treatment with 20 and 40 mg of fluvastatin was associated with reductions in plasma apo B (median change: -19.3% and -22.8%, respectively; p < 0.001), LpE:B (-12.5% and -22.6%, respectively; p < 0.001), and LpC-III:B (-3.6% and -36.8%, respectively; p < 0.001) particles compared with placebo. Significant increases in plasma apo A-I (1.7% and 4.8%, respectively; p < 0.001) and antiatherogenic LpA-I (2.3% and 6.9%, respectively; p < 0.001) were also observed. Levels of LpA-I:A-II were not affected by fluvastatin treatment. In conclusion, 6-week treatment with fluvastatin is associated with beneficial antiatherogenic changes in lipoparticle profiles in hypercholesterolemic patients.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1994

Long-term treatment of hypercholesterolemia with fluvastatin: a 52-week multicenter safety and efficacy study. French-Dutch Fluvastatin Study Group.

In this long-term (52-week) open-label extension to an earlier randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial, 381 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia received fluvastatin at increasing doses of 10 to 40 mg/day to achieve plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol normalization, according to the European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines. The aim of the extension study was to assess the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fluvastatin. After 52 weeks of therapy, 75% of patients were receiving fluvastatin at 40 mg/day (mean dose: 36 +/- 8 mg/day). The mean percent change in LDL-cholesterol levels from baseline was -24.8% (p < 0.001), and 82.6% of patients achieved an LDL-cholesterol reduction of > or = 15%. In patients in the lowest baseline quintile, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels were significantly (p < 0.001) increased by 8.8% whereas, in the highest baseline quintile, triglycerides were significantly (p < 0.001) reduced by 15.3%. Plasma lipoparticle (a) [Lp(a)]:B levels were also significantly reduced (-38.6%; p < 0.001). Fluvastatin was considered to be well tolerated by the majority of patients by both patients and investigators. The most frequently reported adverse event was abdominal pain. Notable biochemical abnormalities were rare. In conclusion, the results of this extension study indicate that fluvastatin at dosages of 20-40 mg/day is effective and well tolerated in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and is accompanied by no particular problems of safety.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Long-term efficacy with fluvastatin as monotherapy and combined with cholestyramine (a 156-week multicenter study). French-Dutch Fluvastatin Study Group.

Fluvastatin monotherapy up to 40 mg/day over 52 weeks in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia decreased plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 28%, with varying decreases in plasma triglycerides and increases in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Patients completing the 52-week study participated in a further trial to assess whether the efficacy of fluvastatin (20-40 mg/day), either as monotherapy or in combination with cholestyramine (CME; 4-16 g/day), taken at least 4 hours prior to fluvastatin, is sustained for up to 3 years. Patients were assessed every 12 weeks on average for safety and efficacy, the latter being calculated as a percent change from baseline of lipids or lipoproteins. During the second year (endpoint up to week 104), 147 patients received monotherapy (estimated mean dose, 30.2 mg/day) and 127 received additional CME (38.1 mg/day fluvastatin plus 10.1 g/day CME). During the third year (endpoint up to week 156), 140 patients received monotherapy (32.5 mg/day) and 67 received additional CME (39.3 mg/day fluvastatin plus 10.3 mg/day CME). Statistically significant reductions in mean total cholesterol and LDL-C and increases in mean HDL-C were achieved in both treatment groups and maintained throughout the study. A significant reduction in triglyceride levels was only observed at the second year endpoint in patients receiving monotherapy (-10.0%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

PubMed1994

Effect of fluvastatin on plasma apolipoprotein-B-containing particles, including lipoprotein(a). European Fluvastatin Study Group.

Epidemiological studies have demonstrated an association between apolipoprotein-(apo)-B containing particles [lipoprotein (Lp) (a), LpE:B; LpC-III:B] and coronary heart disease (CHD). The effect of fluvastatin, a novel competitive inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, on these plasma lipoprotein levels was studied in patients with hypercholesterolaemia after 14 weeks of standard dietary therapy. The results of a placebo-controlled, dose-response study and of the combined data of the European double-blind, controlled studies on the effect of fluvastatin are presented. The patients were selected according to the following criteria of inclusion: plasma low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels > 160 mg dL-1 and premature CHD and/or two associated risk factors, or LDL cholesterol > 190 mg dL-1 and no CHD, plus triglycerides < 300 mg dL-1. All measurements were performed at the Pasteur Institute Central Laboratory. Lp(a), LpE:B and LpC-III:B particles were measured by double-site ELISA. In the placebo-controlled, dose-response study, 429 subjects were randomly assigned to one of the following treatment groups: placebo, fluvastatin 2.5 mg q.p.m., 5 mg q.p.m., 10 mg q.p.m. and 20 mg q.p.m. Treatment with fluvastatin for 6 weeks was associated with a dose-dependent reduction of LDL cholesterol, apoB, LpE:B and LpCIII:B levels. In addition, treatment with fluvastatin 5 mg and 20 mg q.p.m. was associated with a significant reduction in median Lp(a) concentrations (3.2%, P < 0.05 and 6.4%, P < 0.05 respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Fluvastatin for the prevention of restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty: angiographic and methodological background of the fluvastatin angioplasty restenosis trial.

Luminal renarrowing (restenosis) is the major limitation of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), and the search for a 'magic bullet' to prevent this apparent biological healing response to vessel injury has thus far been unsuccessful. Large clinical trials using serial quantitative coronary angiography have, however, provided some valuable insight into this area. In particular, the restenosis process may be measured as the loss in minimal luminal diameter from post-PTCA to follow-up angiography, and is essentially ubiquitous and normally distributed. The angiographic outcome of clinical trials can thus be appropriately evaluated using a continuous rather than a categorical approach, which also considerably reduces the number of patients required. Fluvastatin, a synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, has been shown experimentally to reduce the neointimal proliferative response after PTCA, independent of its lipid-lowering action. The FLuvastatin Angioplasty REstenosis trial was designed to evaluate whether fluvastatin 40 mg twice daily, commencing at least 2 weeks before planned PTCA, can reduce luminal loss by 30% from successful PTCA to follow-up angiography at 26 +/- 2 weeks in 730 evaluable patients.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

PubMed2001

Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of fluvastatin extended-release and immediate-release formulations in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: A new extended-release (ER) formulation of fluvastatin 80 mg has been developed for once-daily treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the lipid-lowering efficacy and tolerability of fluvastatin ER (80 mg once daily) versus fluvastatin immediate-release (IR) (40 mg once or twice daily). METHODS: Following a 4-week placebo/dietary run-in period, patients with primary hypercholesterolemia type IIa or IIb (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ILDL-C] > or = 160 mg/dL and triglycerides [TG] < or = 400 mg/dL) were randomized (2:1:1) to receive fluvastatin ER 80 mg once daily at bedtime (QPM), fluvastatin IR 40 mg QPM, or fluvastatin IR 40 mg BID for 24 weeks. Patients who had homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia; type I, III, IV, V, or secondary hyperlipoproteinemia; diabetes; or evidence of liver or renal impairment were excluded. At weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 of the active-treatment period, levels of LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), TG, and total cholesterol (TC) were measured. RESULTS: Of the 1183 patients enrolled, 695 were randomly assigned to treatment--346 to fluvastatin ER 80 mg QPM, 174 to fluvastatin IR 40 mg QPM, and 175 to fluvastatin IR 40 mg BID. Patients were well matched between groups, with a mean age of approximately 56 years and body mass index of 27 kg/m2; 56.0% of patients (389/695) were female and 97.7% (679/695) were white. Fluvastatin ER 80 mg QPM lowered LDL-C levels significantly more than did fluvastatin IR 40 mg QPM (33.7% vs 24.4%; P < 0.001) and as effectively as fluvastatin IR 40 mg BID (33.9%). More than half of the patients administered fluvastatin ER 80 mg QPM and IR 40 mg BID achieved reductions in LDL-C levels of > or = 35%; more than half of those administered fluvastatin IR 40 mg QPM experienced reductions in LDL-C levels of > or = 25%. The mean reductions in LDL:HDL ratio, TC, and apolipoprotein B levels in the fluvastatin ER 80 mg QPM group were significantly greater than the reductions in the IR 40 mg QPM group (P < 0.001). In patients with mixed dyslipidemia, fluvastatin ER 80 mg reduced triglycerides by 21.8% (median 28%) and increased HDL-C by 14.5%. Fluvastatin ER 80 mg QPM was well tolerated, with incidences of clinically notable elevations in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and creatine kinase levels and musculoskeletal adverse events comparable to those in the IR 40 mg QPM group. CONCLUSION: The ER 80-mg formulation of fluvastatin is effective and well tolerated as a once-daily starting and maintenance treatment for primary hypercholesterolemia.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Comparison of treatment with fluvastatin extended-release 80-mg tablets and immediate-release 40-mg capsules in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: According to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines, hypercholesterolemic patients with greater risk for cardiovascular heart disease require more aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Numerous studies have demonstrated that despite these guidelines, patients often do not reach their target levels, and that physicians frequently do not titrate the drug beyond the starting dose. For these patients, it may be more suitable to initiate treatment with a higher starting dose of statin. With the immediate-release (IR) formulation of fluvastatin, the maximal dose of 80 mg is recommended to be administered in divided doses (40 mg BID). An extended-release (ER) formulation of fluvastatin at a higher dose (fluvastatin ER 80 mg) was designed to provide greater LDL-C lowering with QD dosing. Use of this formulation should bring more patients into compliance with target LDL-C levels. OBJECTIVE: This analysis compared the efficacy and tolerability of fluvastatin ER 80 mg QD and fluvastatin IR 40 mg QD in lowering total cholesterol, LDL-C, triglyceride, and apolipoprotein (apo) B levels and raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apo A-I levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia over a 12-week treatment period. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled study Patients with primary hypercholesterolemia who qualified for lipid-lowering drug therapy based on NCEP ATP II guidelines were randomized to fluvastatin ER 80 mg QD or fluvastatin IR 40 mg QD, and treated for 12 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were randomized to treatment: 86 to the fluvastatin ER 80-mg group and 87 to the fluvastatin IR 40-mg group. Compared with fluvastatin IR 40 mg, fluvastatin ER 80 mg produced greater mean reductions in LDL-C (32% vs 22%, respectively; P < 0.001). For each of the 3 coronary heart disease (CHD) risk groups (defined by the NCEP), as well as for the total population studied, more patients from the fluvastatin ER 80-mg group than the IR 40 group achieved NCEP ATP II target LDL-C levels (79% vs 47%, respectively [P = NS], for patients with < 2 risk factors; 58% vs 15%, respectively [P < 0.001], for patients with > or = 2 risk factors; and 40% vs 14%, respectively [P = 0.012], for patients with CHD). The 80-mg ER dose of fluvastatin provided 9.1% greater LDL-C lowering than the 40-mg IR dose. The incidence of elevations in transaminase levels was low and similar for both doses, with 1 patient in each of the treatment groups being discontinued due to repeated elevation of transaminases > 3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN). Clinically relevant elevations in creatine kinase (ie, > or = 10x ULN) were not observed with either dose. Nine patients (5 in the fluvastatin ER group and 4 in the fluvastatin IR group) discontinued because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with fluvastatin ER 80 mg resulted in greater reductions in LDL-C, total cholesterol, and apo B levels compared with fluvastatin IR 40 mg, with clinically equivalent reduction in triglyceride levels and elevation of HDL-C levels. Furthermore, there were few tolerability concerns of clinical relevance with either formulation and no clinically meaningful difference in the tolerability parameters between the 2 formulations. For patients with higher baseline LDL-C levels, and for patients who require greater LDL-C lowering, it may be appropriate to initiate therapy with fluvastatin ER 80 mg. Use of the higher starting dose likely would bring a greater proportion of high-risk patients into compliance with NCEP ATP II target LDL-C levels and would provide LDL-C lowering that is in the same range that has been proved in clinical trials to be associated with reductions in CHD event rates.

Anticholesteremic Agents↗

PubMed2001

Clinical pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin.

Fluvastatin, the first fully synthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, has been shown to reduce cholesterol in patients with hyperlipidaemia, to prevent subsequent coronary events in patients with established coronary heart disease, and to alter endothelial function and plaque stability in animal models. Fluvastatin is relatively hydrophilic, compared with the semisynthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, and, therefore, it is extensively absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. After absorption, it is nearly completely extracted and metabolised in the liver to 2 hydroxylated metabolites and an N-desisopropyl metabolite, which are excreted in the bile. Approximately 95% of a dose is recovered in the faeces, with 60% of a dose recovered as the 3 metabolites. The 6-hydroxy and N-desisopropyl fluvastatin metabolites are exclusively generated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and do not accumulate in the blood. CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP2C8 and CYP2D6 form the 5-hydroxy fluvastatin metabolite. Because of its hydrophilic nature and extensive plasma protein binding, fluvastatin has a small volume of distribution with minimal concentrations in extrahepatic tissues. The pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin are not influenced by renal function, due to its extensive metabolism and biliary excretion; limited data in patients with cirrhosis suggest a 30% reduction in oral clearance. Age and gender do not appear to affect the disposition of fluvastatin. CYP3A4 inhibitors (erythromycin, ketoconazole and itraconazole) have no effect on fluvastatin pharmacokinetics, in contrast to other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors which are primarily metabolised by CYP3A and are subject to potential drug interactions with CYP3A inhibitors. Coadministration of fluvastatin with gastrointestinal agents such as cholestyramine, and gastric acid regulating agents (H2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors), significantly alters fluvastatin disposition by decreasing and increasing bioavailability, respectively. The nonspecific CYP inducer rifampicin (rifampin) significantly increases fluvastatin oral clearance. In addition to being a CYP2C9 substrate, fluvastatin demonstrates inhibitory effects on this isoenzyme in vitro and in vivo. In human liver microsomes, fluvastatin significantly inhibits the hydroxylation of 2 CYP2C9 substrates, tolbutamide and diclofenac. The oral clearances of the CYP2C9 substrates diclofenac, tolbutamide, glibenclamide (glyburide) and losartan are reduced by 15 to 25% when coadministered with fluvastatin. These alterations have not been shown to be clinically significant. There are inadequate data evaluating the potential interaction of fluvastatin with warfarin and phenytoin, 2 CYP2C9 substrates with a narrow therapeutic index, and caution is recommended when using fluvastatin with these agents. Fluvastatin does not appear to have a significant effect on other CYP isoenzymes or P-glycoprotein-mediated transport in vivo.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Reduced susceptibility of low density lipoprotein (LDL) to lipid peroxidation after fluvastatin therapy is associated with the hypocholesterolemic effect of the drug and its binding to the LDL.

Increased plasma cholesterol concentration in hypercholesterolemic patients is a major risk factor for atherosclerosis. The impaired removal of plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) in these patients results in the presence of their LDL in the plasma for a long period of time and thus can contribute to its enhanced oxidative modification. In the present study we analyzed the effect of the hypocholesterolemic drug, fluvastatin, on plasma and LDL susceptibilities to oxidation during 24 weeks of therapy. Fluvastatin therapy (40 mg/day for 24 weeks) in 10 hypercholesterolemic patients resulted in 30%, 34% and 22% decrements in plasma levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides, respectively. This effect has been achieved after only 4 weeks of therapy. We next studied the effect of fluvastatin therapy on LDL susceptibility to oxidation in vivo and in vitro. 2.2-Azobis, 2-amidinopropane hydrochloride (AAPH, 100 mM)-induced plasma lipid peroxidation was decreased by 70% and 77% after 12 weeks and 24 weeks of fluvastatin therapy respectively. The lag time required for the initiation of CuSO4 (10 microM)-induced LDL oxidation was prolonged by 1.2- and 2.5-fold, after 12 and 24 weeks of fluvastatin therapy respectively. We next analyzed the in vitro effect of fluvastatin on plasma and LDL susceptibilities to oxidation. Preincubation of plasma or LDLs that were obtained from normal subjects with 0.1 microgram/ml of fluvastatin, caused 20% or 57% reduction in AAPH-induced lipid peroxidation, respectively. Similarly, a 1.6- and 2.7-fold prolongation of the lag time required for CuSO4-induced LDL oxidation was found following LDL incubation with 0.1 and 1.0 microgram/ml of fluvastatin, respectively. To find out possible mechanisms that contribute to this inhibitory effect of fluvastatin on LDL oxidizability, we analyzed the antioxidative properties of fluvastatin. Fluvastatin did not scavenge free radicals and did not inhibit linoleic acid peroxidation. Fluvastatin also did not act as a chelator of copper ions. However, fluvastatin was shown to specifically bind mainly to the LDL surface phospholipids and this interaction altered the lipoprotein charge as evident from the 38% decrement in the electrophoretic mobility of fluvastatin-treated LDL, in comparison to nontreated LDL. The inhibitory effect of fluvastatin therapy on LDL oxidation probably involves both its stimulatory effect on LDL removal from the circulation, as well as a direct binding effect of the drug to the lipoprotein. We thus conclude that the antiatherogenic properties of fluvastatin may not be limited to its hypocholesterolemic effect, but could also be related to its ability to reduce LDL oxidizability.

Adult↗