PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Fluvoxamine”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide compared with fluvoxamine in depressive disorder (DSM III). A French/Swiss double-blind trial.

The efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide and fluvoxamine, two new types of antidepressant agents, were compared in a multicentre, double-blind prospective study of patients with a diagnosis of major depressive episode (DSM III). Patients were randomized to receive either moclobemide (150 mg) or fluvoxamine (50 mg) twice daily for 7 days, immediately following a washout period of at least 1 week. Dosages were increased where necessary on day 8, to a maximum of moclobemide 450 mg or fluvoxamine 200 mg and in most cases were maintained at these levels for the remainder of the study period (4-6 weeks). Both treatment groups showed a marked antidepressant effect. While both treatments were well tolerated, moclobemide showed a more favourable side-effect profile than fluvoxamine. Of the 126 patients eligible for evaluation, 34 withdrew from therapy, 22% in the moclobemide group and 30% in the fluvoxamine group. Adverse events were reported in 41.8% of patients treated with moclobemide compared to 60.3% of patients in the fluvoxamine group. Reports of dry mouth and other anticholinergic effects were more frequent among those treated with fluvoxamine. A greater number of gastrointestinal complaints, especially nausea, also occurred in the fluvoxamine-treated patients.

Adult

Fluvoxamine does not interact with alcohol or potentiate alcohol-related impairment of cognitive function.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether fluvoxamine alters the pharmacokinetics of alcohol or potentiates alcohol-related impairment of cognitive function. METHODS: The study design required partially "blinded" balanced crossover studies, each involving 12 healthy male volunteers who each received a 40 gm dose of intravenous or oral alcohol after single and multiple doses of 50 mg fluvoxamine. Main outcome measures for pharmacokinetics were venous blood alcohol and plasma fluvoxamine. Main outcome measures for pharmacodynamics were word recall, simple and choice reaction time, number vigilance, memory scanning, and word recognition. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of intravenous alcohol were not affected by concomitant administration of fluvoxamine. Compared with placebo-alcohol, alcohol slightly increased the rate of fluvoxamine absorption, but the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours at steady state was unchanged. As expected, alcohol significantly impaired cognitive function in volunteers. However, fluvoxamine did not potentiate the effects of alcohol and in some instances appeared to reverse the effects or reduce their duration. Fluvoxamine was well tolerated: only mild adverse effects were reported, and none of those required intervention. CONCLUSION: Fluvoxamine does not interact significantly with alcohol or potentiate alcohol-related impairment of cognitive function.

Administration, Oral

Response to total sleep deprivation before and during treatment with fluvoxamine or maprotiline in patients with major depression--results of a double-blind study.

To test the hypothesis that the antidepressant effects of total sleep deprivation (TSD) are linked to the serotonergic and/or noradrenergic system the authors carried out a double-blind study (fluvoxamine versus maprotiline) in 42 inpatients with endogenous depression (ICD). Patients were randomized to a four-week treatment with either fluvoxamine (100-300 mg/day) or maprotiline (100-300 mg/day). In addition, patients underwent a TSD procedure before and after one week of antidepressant medication. There was a statistically significant reduction of depression ratings (HDRS) in both the fluvoxamine and maprotiline group. The day-1 response to TSD before antidepressive medication was not associated with a clear relationship to the outcome after four weeks of treatment with either fluvoxamine or maprotiline. On the other hand, the day-2 response to TSD was significantly correlated with a good outcome to subchronic treatment with maprotiline. Furthermore, the results of the authors' data suggest that a favorable short-term outcome of TSD may be connected to antidepressants enhancing the serotonergic neurotransmission. The global comparison between fluvoxamine and maprotiline revealed that the group of patients treated with fluvoxamine had a significantly higher efficiency index (CGI) than the maprotiline group; fluvoxamine was rated to be tolerated excellently in 70% of the patients whereas this percentage was only 43% in the maprotiline group. There was also significantly more vertigo and dry mouth in the maprotiline group whereas the fluvoxamine group was rated to have significantly more sleep disturbances during the trial.

Adult

A review of fluvoxamine and its uses in depression.

Fluvoxamine is a potent and specific 5-HT reuptake inhibitor which has been available since 1983 and is estimated to have been given to two and a half million patients since it was first investigated in patients with depression in the late 1970s. The effectiveness of fluvoxamine in depression is therefore analysed in this review, on the basis of ten years experience. Results from 10 international double-blind placebo-controlled trials, the large majority of which included a positive control (usually imipramine), have shown that fluvoxamine is as effective as the older tricyclic antidepressants and significantly more effective than placebo. In the majority of twenty direct comparative studies against other antidepressants, fluvoxamine has been found to be as effective and well-tolerated as the reference drug. Effectiveness in the elderly depressed and support for the use of fluvoxamine in tricyclic-resistant depression is discussed. Clinical trials of fluvoxamine conducted in anxiety states and obsessive-compulsive disorder, both of which commonly co-occur with depression, are reviewed, and the efficacy of fluvoxamine in the depressed obese and patients with bulimia nervosa is examined. Reports of adverse experiences, both from clinical trials and clinical practice are discussed, and the overall risk-benefit for fluvoxamine treatment in depression is critically assessed.

Depressive Disorder

Fluvoxamine, a specific 5-hydroxytryptamine uptake inhibitor.

1. On the basis of both in vitro and in vivo experiments fluvoxamine has been characterized as a potential anti-depressant drug with almost exclusively 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) uptake inhibiting properties. 2. Fluvoxamine is effective in inhibiting 5-ht uptake by blood platelets and brain synaptosomes. Due to inhibition of the membrane pump the compound prevents 5-HT depletion by the tyramine-derivatives H 75/12 and H 77/77. As a result of the interference with the neuronal re-uptake mechanism for 5-HT, fluvoxamine produces a decreased 5-HT turnover in the brain. Effects of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) are potentiated in mice and in combination with pargyline, fluvoxamine induces 5-HT-like behavioural effects. 3. In contrast to tricyclic antidepressants, noradrenaline uptake processes are either unaffected or only slightly inhibited by fluvoxamine. The noradrenaline depleting effects of tyramine derivates are not influenced by fluvoxamine. Reserpine effects, such as ptosis are affected only at very high doses of the test compound. The antagonism by fluvoxamine of the reserpine-induced lowering of the pentamethylenetetrazole convulsive threshold can be regarded as due to an effect upon 5-HT uptake. In contrast to the effects of desmethylimipramine and imipramine, no stimulatory effects are found in rats when rapidly acting reserpine-like compounds are given following a dose of fluvoxamine.

5-Hydroxytryptophan

A placebo-controlled inpatient comparison of fluvoxamine maleate and imipramine in major depression.

Fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, was investigated in a 6-week double-blind study among severely ill inpatients with DSM-III major depression. All but 1 patient also fulfilled criteria for melancholia. Following a 3-day placebo wash-out patients were randomly assigned to fluvoxamine, imipramine or placebo. Sixty of 81 patients completed at least 2 weeks following wash-out and were evaluated for efficacy. Analysis of covariance (controlling for baseline scores) showed significant (p less than 0.05) differences on CGI severity and BPRS total and a similar trend (p = 0.08) on the Hamilton Depression Scale. Fluvoxamine was superior (p less than or equal to 0.02) to both placebo and imipramine on these measures. Fluvoxamine's most common adverse effects were nausea and agitation. The number of fluvoxamine patients withdrawn for side-effects was less than imipramine and not significantly different than placebo. Fluvoxamine was not associated with significant changes in vital signs, ECG or laboratory tests. The results therefore indicate that fluvoxamine is a safe and highly effective treatment for hospitalized patients with major depression.

Adolescent

Chronic treatment with fluvoxamine, clovoxamine, and placebo: interaction with digoxin and effects on sleep and alertness.

The influence of 17 days of administration of fluvoxamine or clovoxamine, two new antidepressant agents, on the kinetics of a single intravenous dose of digoxin, and on self-rated parameters of sedation, mood, and sleep, was evaluated in a series of healthy volunteers. In the fluvoxamine study, subjects received fluvoxamine, 100 mg daily, or matching placebo for 17 consecutive days in a crossover design. For the clovoxamine study, subjects received clovoxamine, 150 mg daily, or placebo for 17 days. All treatments were double blind. At the end of each treatment, digoxin kinetics were evaluated following a single 1.25 mg intravenous dose. Compared to the placebo condition, fluvoxamine had no significant influence on digoxin elimination half-life (57 vs 47 hours), volume of distribution (10.5 vs 10.3 liters/kg), total clearance (2.4 vs 3.0 ml/min/kg), or 72 hour urinary excretion (33 vs 37 percent of the dose). Likewise clovoxamine did not alter digoxin elimination half-life (39 vs 40 hours), volume of distribution (10.7 vs 10.2 liters/kg), or total clearance 3.4 vs 3.4 ml/min/kg). 72 hour urinary excretion of digoxin was slightly increased by clovoxamine (41 vs 50 percent of the dose, P less than .05). Self-ratings indicated a sedating effect of fluvoxamine, with reports of difficulty attaining morning alertness. These effects were not reported with clovoxamine. Thus clovoxamine and fluvoxamine appear to have differential effects on sleep and alertness in healthy volunteers. However, neither have an important influence on the kinetics of digoxin.

Adult

Fluvoxamine in the treatment of the older depressed patient; double-blind, placebo-controlled data.

Fluvoxamine was given in placebo-controlled trials to 33 severely depressed patients of between 60 and 71 years, 29 received imipramine and 14 placebo. At week 4 of treatment fluvoxamine and imipramine were superior to placebo on the HAMD and CGI scales (P less than 0.05). There was indication of an earlier onset of antidepressant activity in the fluvoxamine group. There was no evidence of systematic changes in laboratory variables in any treatment group. Fluvoxamine and placebo had similar effects on heart rate and blood pressure. Imipramine was associated with significant postural falls in mean systolic pressure. The most frequent unwanted symptom with fluvoxamine was mild nausea, with imipramine, dry mouth. Toxic confusion was the major reason for dropout in the imipramine (n = 4) and nausea (n = 3) in the fluvoxamine-treated group.

Aged

Fluvoxamine and imipramine: results of a long-term controlled trial.

Following a multicentre double-blind controlled trial comparing the effects of fluvoxamine and imipramine in depressed inpatients (M.D.E.) 39 patients continued on longer term treatment with maintenance of double-blind conditions (17 on fluvoxamine, 22 on imipramine). The results regarding the reasons for premature interruption of treatment show a slight advantage in favour of fluvoxamine. There were several significant differences in favour of fluvoxamine at the 20th week. The most common side-effects were hot flushes with imipramine and dizziness with fluvoxamine. Overall, despite the small number of patients, the results show a greater clinical tolerance to fluvoxamine than to imipramine.

Antidepressive Agents

Treatment of alcoholic organic brain syndrome with the serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluvoxamine: a preliminary study.

The chronic effects of fluvoxamine (200 mg per day for 4 weeks) were studied in ten alcoholic organic brain syndrome patients in a double-blind cross-over design. Complete neuropsychological evaluation was performed as well as measurement of neurochemical changes in CSF. Fluvoxamine produced a small but significant improvement in memory performance. An analysis of fluvoxamine minus placebo difference scores showed a significant correlation between memory functioning and CSF 5HIAA levels. Alcohol amnestic syndrome patients who had the highest blood levels of fluvoxamine demonstrated the largest changes in CSF 5HIAA and improvement in memory performance under fluvoxamine. These findings implicate a role of serotonergic mechanisms in alcoholic organic brain syndrome and suggest that with individual titration of the drug dose, fluvoxamine might be a clinically useful agent in the treatment of this syndrome.

Aged

Fluvoxamine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in depressive illness.

Fluvoxamine is a new antidepressant which potently and specifically inhibits neuronal reuptake of serotonin. In the absence of other major pharmacological effects it appears that its antidepressant activity stems from facilitation of serotoninergic neurotransmission as a result of reuptake inhibition. Studies suggest that fluvoxamine has overall therapeutic efficacy comparable with that of imipramine and clomipramine in depressive illness. It causes fewer anticholinergic-type and cardiovascular side effects than the tricyclic antidepressants but it is associated with a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting. Elderly patients also respond well to fluvoxamine. Studies are now required to compare fluvoxamine with other second generation antidepressants and to establish whether some types of depressive illness respond more readily to fluvoxamine than other agents. Thus, in patients with depressive illness, fluvoxamine offers a suitable alternative to tricyclic antidepressants and may be especially valuable in patients with concomitant cardiovascular disease, and those unresponsive to or unable to tolerate tricyclic antidepressants.

Animals

[The status of fluvoxamine among the antidepressive agents].

Fluvoxamine was administered in an open trial of 50 hospitalized patients with major depression of the melancholic type (DSM-III-R) for an average period of 24.56 days in mean minimal and maximal daily doses of 100-311 mg orally after a wash-out interval of 1-14 days. Treatment achieved complete improvement in 54% and partial improvement in 16% of the patients, significantly more frequently in women than in men. The antidepressant effect of fluvoxamine was confirmed also by a statistically significant reduction of the global HAMD and FKD score, starting on the 7th day of the trial. The therapeutic effect was clinically apparent during the second week of treatment. The best therapeutic effect was achieved in anxiety depressions (65%), to a lesser degree inhibitory depressions (50%) and atypical ones (46%), as apparent from the value of Náhunek's antidepressive index 0.88 which suggests a significant anxiolytic effectiveness of fluvoxamine. Fluvoxamine had a positive effect on the majority of HAMD and FKD items, incl. a depressive mood, anxiety, feelings of guilt, anhedonia, reduced interest and ability, obsession, depressive thoughts and suicidal tendencies. Reduced motor activity, loss of appetite, insight, somatic symptoms, paranoidity and hypochondria were less influenced. At the onset of treatment the preparation did not reduced insomnia and thus in 72% patients hypnotics were added. In the course of fluvoxamine therapy no suicidal attempts were observed although 34 (68%) of the patients initially admitted had suicidal thoughts. Fluvoxamine is well tolerated by patients; as to side-effects gastrointestinal complaints were most frequent (in 28% of the patients).

Adult

Some central effects of repeated treatment with fluvoxamine.

We investigated the effect of repeated treatment with fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin uptake inhibitor, on behavioral effects of dopaminomimetics and methoxamine and on the animal behavior in the "behavioral despair" test. A repeated treatment with fluvoxamine (twice daily for 14 days) potentiated in mice and in rats (weaker) the amphetamine-induced hyperactivity. The hyperactivity induced by nomifensine in mice remained unaffected by fluvoxamine. The stimulation of locomotor activity by intracerebroventricularly administered methoxamine was not affected by repeated treatment with fluvoxamine. Given three times fluvoxamine had no effect on the immobilization time in the "behavioral despair" test in rats. The results indicate that fluvoxamine given repeatedly acts differently than citalopram, another selective serotonin uptake inhibitor, and differs also from other antidepressant drugs.

Animals

Efficacy of fluvoxamine in obsessive-compulsive disorder. A double-blind comparison with placebo.

A six- to eight-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial of the potent and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluvoxamine was conducted in 42 patients with primary obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Approximately one half of the patients also had symptoms of major depression. Fluvoxamine was significantly better than placebo on all measures of obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Nine of 21 patients were responders ("much improved") with fluvoxamine compared with no responders with placebo, and fluvoxamine was effective in patients with OCD both with and without secondary depression. Response of OCD was not correlated with severity of baseline depression. These data lend partial support to the serotonin hypothesis of OCD. However, since a number of patients failed to respond to fluvoxamine, the role of other neurochemical systems in this disorder needs to be explored.

Adult

Specificity of serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Comparison of fluvoxamine and desipramine.

To evaluate whether serotonin reuptake inhibition is critical to the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder, 40 outpatients with a principal diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder were randomized in a double-blind fashion to 8 weeks of treatment with either the serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluvoxamine maleate (n = 21) or the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor desipramine hydrochloride (n = 19). Fluvoxamine was significantly better than desipramine in reducing the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms, as measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale and by the global response rate ("responder" equaling "much improved"). Eleven of 21 patients were responders with fluvoxamine compared with 2 of 19 patients with desipramine. Fluvoxamine, but not desipramine, was also effective in reducing the severity of "secondary" depression. Fluvoxamine-induced improvement in symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder was not correlated with the severity of baseline depressive symptoms. This study provides additional evidence that the acute serotonin reuptake properties of a drug are predictive of its anti-obsessive-compulsive efficacy. It is hypothesized that the mechanism of action of serotonin reuptake inhibitors in obsessive-compulsive disorder may be related to chronic treatment-induced adaptive changes in presynaptic serotonin receptor function (eg, autoreceptor desensitization) and/or indirect influences on dopaminergic function (eg, in the basal ganglia).

Adult

Bioavailability of fluvoxamine given with and without food.

The influence of concomitant food intake on plasma concentrations of the antidepressant drug fluvoxamine maleate was investigated in a two-way, crossover study design. Eight male and four female healthy, young volunteers received a single oral dose of fluvoxamine maleate (50 mg, tablet) on two occasions: after an overnight fast and immediately after a breakfast. Food did not affect maximum fluvoxamine plasma levels (Cmax), or the time to reach Cmax (tmax). The plasma AUC of fluvoxamine was on average 7 per cent lower in the fed than in the fasted state. It is concluded that the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of fluvoxamine is negligible.

Adolescent

The influence of acute and subchronic administration of various antidepressants on early morning melatonin plasma levels in healthy subjects: increases following fluvoxamine.

The influence of various antidepressants on the morning levels of plasma melatonin was studied in human volunteers after acute and subchronic administration in weekly increasing doses over a period of three weeks. Two monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors (tranylcypromine: irreversible type A and B; pirlindole: reversible type A), two reuptake inhibitors (maprotiline: selective for noradrenaline; fluvoxamine: selective for serotonin) and an alpha 1/alpha 2-adrenergic and serotonin S2-receptor antagonist (mianserin) were administered to groups of 4 to 7 healthy volunteers each. Two hours after a single oral dose at 9 a.m., at the end of each week and one week after the last dose, morning levels of melatonin were measured using a radioimmunological method. In addition, platelet MAO activity and the uptake of 14C-5-HT into platelets were determined. Plasma melatonin concentrations at 9 a.m. were significantly increased after the intake of 150 mg fluvoxamine the night before; whereas, administration of the same dose in the morning did not lead to increases in melatonin during the day. Following subchronic administration, plasma melatonin levels were significantly increased after the 1st (50 mg/day), 2nd (100 mg/day) and 3rd (150 mg/day) week of fluvoxamine intake in comparison to pre-drug levels. No changes in early morning levels of plasma melatonin were measured in the subjects receiving the other antidepressants, after acute as well as after subchronic administration. The results seem to indicate that following fluvoxamine intake at night, the early morning decline of melatonin is delayed. It is suggested that the underlying mechanism leading to a rise in morning melatonin levels cannot be explained solely on the basis of an inhibition of 5-HT reuptake and that other pharmacological properties of fluvoxamine may be involved.

Adult

Serotonin function in panic disorder: a double blind placebo controlled study with fluvoxamine and ritanserin.

In order to evaluate serotonin (5-HT) function in panic disorder, a double blind placebo controlled study was conducted with ritanserin, a specific 5-HT2 receptor antagonist, and fluvoxamine, a selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor, in 60 patients with panic disorder. Patients were treated for 8 weeks with 150 mg fluvoxamine, 20 mg ritanserin or placebo; these dose levels were reached after 1 week. In addition, as an index of 5-HT function in panic disorder, plasma concentration of beta-endorphin, cortisol and 5-hydroxyindolacetic-acid (5-HIAA) were measured. Furthermore, 5-HT uptake in blood platelets was assessed. Noradrenergic function was assessed by measuring plasma MHPG concentration. In addition, plasma melatonin concentration was measured. Treatment with fluvoxamine resulted in a profound reduction in the number of panic attacks, followed by a decrease in avoidance behavior. Treatment with ritanserin appeared to be ineffective. During treatment no significant changes were observed in plasma concentrations of beta-endorphin, cortisol, 5-HIAA and MHPG. With respect to 5-HT kinetics in blood platelets, a substantial increase in Km was observed after treatment with fluvoxamine, whereas Vmax decreased. After treatment with fluvoxamine, plasma concentration of melatonin was significantly increased, which suggests that melatonin synthesis is in part under serotonergic control. The findings of the present study do not support the hypothesis that 5-HT2 receptors are supersensitive in patients suffering from panic disorder, but allow no conclusions about the involvement of other 5-HT receptor subtypes.

Adult