PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Forehead”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Repair of large defects in the forehead using a median forehead rotation flap and advancement lateral U-shaped flap.

BACKGROUND: The forehead is a large and highly expressive and dynamic cosmetic unit. Most forehead defects that cannot be closed primarily are reconstructed with laterally based advancement flaps. OBJECTIVE: A combination of median forehead rotation flap and advancement lateral U-shaped flap for repair of medium- to-large-size defects in paramedian and lateral forehead is described. METHODS: Technically, the design of median forehead rotation flap based on supratrochlear vessels used here is similar to the median forehead transposition flap used to reconstruct large defects of the nasal dorsum. The length and the movement of the flap are much smaller in this case. Approximately 2/3 of the closure of the defect is achieved by displacing the median forehead flap while the remaining 1/3 corresponds to the advancement of the lateral U-shaped flap. RESULTS: The flaps are simple to perform, have minimal complications, and have good cosmetic results. A representative case is presented with photographs. CONCLUSION: For selected medium- to large-size horizontal defects in the paramedian and the lateral forehead, the combination of a median forehead rotation flap and an advancement lateral U-shaped flap offers a simple, visually pleasing repair that preserves the forehead architecture.

Craniocerebral Trauma↗

[The arteries of the forehead as the basis of nasal reconstruction with forehead flaps].

For the reconstruction of nasal defects, paramedian forehead flaps with a small pedicel are used. The nutrition of these flaps depends on the presence of an arterial blood vessel in the pedicel. In constructing the flap it is absolutely necessary to know the position and the course of the vessles in the forehead. The branches of the ophthalmic artery - dorsal nasal artery, supratrochlear artery, and supraorbital artery - are responsible for the nutrition of the forehead. These arteries are connected with those lying next to them. Additionally, they all anastomose with the frontal branch of the superficial temporal artery. The branches of the ophthalmic artery, lying in a more lateral position, follow a diagonal course compared with those lying more medially. Considering all forehead vessels, the forehead branch of the dorsal nasal artery is widely unknown, although it is very important for the supply of the central part of the forehead. Together with the supratrochlear artery, which lies on a paramedian line passing through the medial angle of the eye, it represents the nutrition vessels of the forehead flap. In case of injury of the ophthalmic artery, the anastomosis of the angular artery with the dorsal nasal artery can be of great importance for the supply of the flap.

Adult↗

[The forehead cutaneo-musculo-aponeurotic unit and aging of the forehead. Anatomo-physiological considerations and surgical implications].

The occipitofrontalis muscle, as it is described in classical anatomy text books, does not exist. The epicranial aponeurosis or galea aponeurotica receives the occipitalis muscle on its deep surface and the frontalis muscle on its superficial surface. The frontalis muscle plays a fundamental role not only in forehead expression, but also in the support and elevation of the eyelids. This revised and corrected anatomy gives rise to the concept of the forehead cutaneomusculoaponeurotic unit, composed of skin, galea and frontalis muscle (forehead CMAU), resulting in a new forehead facelift which corrects forehead ageing, essentially related to recession of the forehead and relaxation of the galea.

Adult↗

The importance of the retaining ligamentous attachments of the forehead for selective eyebrow reshaping and forehead rejuvenation.

BACKGROUND: Forehead rejuvenation procedures can lead to excessive elevation of the medial brow, resulting in the "surprised look." Differential treatment of the medial and lateral brow allows more precise positioning. The purpose of this study was to determine whether retaining structures exist in the forehead that would permit this differential elevation. METHODS: Anatomical dissections were performed in the foreheads of 12 cadavers. Multiplanar dissections at the subperiosteal, subgaleal, and subcutaneous levels were performed on eight hemiforeheads. Clinical correlation for these findings was obtained during endoscopic and open brow-lift surgery. RESULTS: Four retaining structures of the brow were identified: three medial and one lateral. The superomedial attachment begins 13 mm from the midline and 10.8 mm above the supraorbital rim. The superolateral attachment begins 23 mm from the midline and 10.3 mm above the supraorbital rim. The inferomedial attachment begins 12.6 mm from the midline at the level of the supraorbital rim, just medial to the supraorbital nerve. These three structures were found to control the position of the medial brow. Laterally, brow position was controlled by a broad ligamentous attachment extending across the lateral aspect of the supraorbital rim. CONCLUSIONS: Medial retaining structures have been found to extend from the cranium into the forehead musculature. Release of the lateral broad ligamentous attachment was performed, followed by selective preservation of medial retaining structures. With this approach, we were able to gain control of the position of the medial brow and prevent overelevation and lateral spreading.

Dissection↗

Aesthetic refinements in use of forehead for nasal reconstruction: the paramedian forehead flap.

Historically, surgeons have avoided use of the forehead for nose reconstruction because they felt larger areas of tissue were required. As plastic surgery has evolved to achieve successful replacement of major nasal defects, the paramedian forehead flap has been refined as the best alternative. Judicious use of central forehead tissue will provide sufficient skin of excellent tint to allow total repair. Scars are almost always unobtrusive. The forehead flap covers fabricated composite flaps of intravasal lining and primary cartilage grafts that create the subsurface architecture of the external nose. The result is a nose with correct shape and color that appears normal.

Forehead↗

Expanded unilateral forehead flap (sail flap) for coverage of opposite forehead defect.

This report details our experience with five patients who had skin defects of their forehead that were covered with an expanded unilateral forehead flap from the contralateral side that we call the sail flap. Skin expansion provides an ideal thin flap for the forehead aesthetic unit. The viability of the sail flap is sufficient through expansion, and it is available in suitable size and shape for the defect. The donor site is minimal and well accepted because the scar coincides with the hairline.

Adult↗

Anatomy of the forehead muscles: the basis for the videoendoscopic approach in forehead rhytidoplasty.

The musculoaponeurotic system that performs mime for the upper third of the face is composed of the subcutaneous fascia and the occipitofrontalis, corrugator supercilii, and procerus muscles. Perfect understanding of the activity of these muscles provides for correction of horizontal furrows on the forehead, horizontal lines on the root of the nose, and glabellar frown lines. An anatomic gap in the deep layer of the subcutaneous fascia provides for the wide mobility of the scalp and forehead. A natural eyebrow lift is achieved by interrupting the restrictive forces of the corrugator supercilii and procerus muscles against the upward action of the occipitofrontalis muscle. The forehead rhytidoplasty through the endoscopic approach can achieve these results with small incisions and without skin resection.

Adult↗

A 10-year experience in nasal reconstruction with the three-stage forehead flap.

Because of its ideal color and texture, forehead skin is acknowledged as the best donor site with which to resurface the nose. However, all forehead flaps, regardless of their vascular pedicles, are thicker than normal nasal skin. Stiff and flat, they do not easily mold from a two-dimensional to a three-dimensional shape. Traditionally, the forehead is transferred in two stages. At the first stage, frontalis muscle and subcutaneous tissue are excised distally and the partially thinned flap is inset into the recipient site. At a second stage, 3 weeks later, the pedicle is divided. However, such soft-tissue "thinning" is limited, incomplete, and piecemeal. Flap necrosis and contour irregularities are especially common in smokers and in major nasal reconstructions. To overcome these problems, the technique of forehead flap transfer was modified. An extra operation was added between transfer and division.At the first stage, a full-thickness forehead flap is elevated with all its layers and is transposed without thinning except for the columellar inset. Primary cartilage grafts are placed if vascularized intranasal lining is present or restored. Importantly, at the first stage, skin grafts or a folded forehead flap can be used effectively for lining. A full-thickness skin graft will reliably survive when placed on a highly vascular bed. A full-thickness forehead flap can be folded to replace missing cover skin, with a distal extension, in continuity, to supply lining. At the second stage, 3 weeks later during an intermediate operation, the full-thickness forehead flap, now healed to its recipient bed, is physiologically delayed. Forehead skin with 3 to 4 mm of subcutaneous fat (nasal skin thickness) is elevated in the unscarred subcutaneous plane over the entire nasal inset, except for the columella. Skin grafts or folded flaps integrate into adjacent normal lining and can be completely separated from the overlying cover from which they were initially vascularized. If used, a folded forehead flap is incised free along the rim, completely separating the proximal cover flap from the distal lining extension. The underlying subcutaneous tissue, frontalis muscle, and any previously positioned cartilage grafts are now widely exposed, and excess soft tissue can be excised to carve an ideal subunit, rigid subsurface architecture. Previous primary cartilage grafts can be repositioned, sculpted, or augmented, if required. Delayed primary cartilage grafts can be placed to support lining created from a skin graft or a folded flap. The forehead cover skin (thin, supple, and conforming) is then replaced on the underlying rigid, recontoured, three-dimensional recipient bed. The pedicle is not transected. At a third stage, 3 weeks later (6 weeks after the initial transfer), the pedicle is divided. Over 10 years in 90 nasal reconstructions for partial and full-thickness defects, the three-stage forehead flap technique with an intermediate operation was used with primary and delayed primary grafts, and with intranasal lining flaps (n = 15), skin grafts (n = 11), folded forehead flaps (n = 3), turnover flaps (n = 5), prefabricated flaps (n = 4), and free flaps for lining (n = 2). Necrosis of the forehead flap did not occur. Late revisions were not required or were minor in partial defects. In full-thickness defects, a major revision and more than two minor revisions were performed in less than 5 percent of patients. Overall, the aesthetic results approached normal. The planned three-stage forehead flap technique of nasal repair with an intermediate operation (1) transfers subtle, conforming forehead skin of ideal thinness for cover, with little risk of necrosis; (2) uses primary and delayed primary grafts and permits modification of initial cartilage grafts to correct failures of design, malposition, or scar contraction before flap division; (3) creates an ideal, rigid subsurface framework of hard and soft tissue that is reflected through overlying skin and blends well into adjacent recipient tissues; (4) expands the application of lining techniques to include the use of skin grafts for lining at the first stage, or as a "salvage procedure" during the second stage, and also permits the aesthetic use of folded forehead flaps for lining; (5) ensures maximal blood supply and vascular safety to all nasal layers; (6) provides the surgeon with options to salvage reconstructive catastrophes; (7) improves the aesthetic result while decreasing the number and difficulty of revision operations and overall time for repair; and (8) emphasizes the interdependence of anatomy (cover, lining, and support) and provides insight into the nature of wound injury and repair in nasal reconstruction.

Esthetics↗

Growth of the fetal forehead and normative dimensions developed by three-dimensional ultrasonographic technology.

Sonographic imaging of the fetal face is important since a number of chromosomal aberrations are associated with facial malformations. In the past, imaging of the fetal forehead and diagnosis of frontal bossing had been based on subjective evaluation using two-dimensional ultrasonography. The purpose of this study was to evaluate quantitatively the fetal forehead using three-dimensional technology to generate normative data throughout gestation. This should allow the objective diagnosis of abnormal growth of the fetal forehead, such as frontal bossing. We also report a case of a fetus with frontal bossing in whom the generated nomogram was applied. A cross-sectional study was performed in 130 normal healthy singleton pregnancies between 16 and 38 weeks' gestation. Using three-dimensional ultrasonography, a line connecting the apex of the philtrum and the nasion was drawn across the anterior forehead, which delineated the area of the forehead for analysis. The forehead length, forehead height, and forehead area under the curve were measured and the forehead index was calculated. A second order polynomial growth function was noted throughout gestation for the forehead length (r = 0.93), forehead height (r = 0.97), and forehead area (r = 0.97). The fetal forehead index remained relatively constant throughout gestation. The results of this study provide normative data of fetal forehead length, width, and area using three-dimensional ultrasonographic technology. Normative dimensions of the fetal forehead developed and presented herein are expected to serve as a basis for the objective assessment of presumed fetal facial abnormalities and may facilitate the detection of the associated syndromes. This is demonstrated in our case report of an achondroplastic fetus in whom all forehead dimensions were above the 95th percentile.

Craniofacial Abnormalities↗

Secondary endoscopic forehead lift in patients with previous coronal brow lifts.

INTRODUCTION: The development of endoscopic surgical techniques has allowed an evolution from the standard coronal forehead lift to a minimally invasive one. Endoscopy avoids many of the undesirable results of the coronal approach while it remains very efficacious. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic forehead lift in patients who have previously undergone coronal brow lift. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on the medical records of 726 consecutive patients who had undergone endoscopic forehead lift between 1994 and 2004. Sixty-three patients were identified who had undergone prior coronal incision brow lift and then required subsequent elevation of the forehead using endoscopy. Those who had persistent low eyebrows and forehead wrinkles underwent the standard minimal incision endoscopic approach. Patients with severe brow ptosis and excessive height of the forehead underwent a biplanar endoscopic forehead lift. RESULTS: Of the 63 endoscopic forehead lifts performed, 49 used the minimal access technique, while 14 employed the biplanar approach. The subject population consisted of 58 female and 5 male patients whose average age was 57 years (range of 42 to 80 years). Eighty-seven percent of these brow lifts also had concomitant rhytidectomy, and 4% had blepharoplasty. Average follow-up was 21 months (range 1 to 7 years). Following the endoscopic procedure, none of the patients had frontal nerve injury, alopecia, or persistent glabellar wrinkle lines. Complications included 1 forehead dysesthesia, 1 forehead irregularity, 1 eyebrow malposition, 1 persistent horizontal forehead wrinkling, and 2 hematomas. Operative management was not required for any of these complications. CONCLUSION: The secondary endoscopic forehead lift is effective in rejuvenating the upper face in the patient who has had a previous coronal forehead lift. It elevates the eyebrows and reduces both transverse and vertical wrinkles while avoiding further displacement of the hairline. The low rate of complications is comparable to that of primary endoscopic forehead lifts. Finally, serial follow-up indicates that the results are effective at correcting brow ptosis and are long lasting.

Adult↗

Comparison of subperiosteal vs subgaleal elevation techniques used in forehead lifts.

OBJECTIVES: To compare eyebrow and forehead elevation and tension among the following 3 surgical techniques: subperiosteal dissection to the supraorbital rim, subperiosteal dissection with release (elevation, incision, and spread) of periosteum at the supraorbital rim, and subgaleal dissection to the supraorbital rim, and to determine the optimal method of elevation in an aesthetically accepted range for the endoscopic forehead lift. DESIGN: A randomized, self-controlled study using an open approach to the forehead in cadaver heads. Each half of head was compared with the other in the following 2 study groups: subperiosteal dissection without release vs subperiosteal dissection with release of periosteum (group 1) and subperiosteal dissection with release of periosteum vs subgaleal dissection. SETTING: Anatomy laboratory at a university medical center. SUBJECTS: Eight cadaver heads fixed with ethylene glycol in each group. INTERVENTION: Predissection distances in millimeters from fixed anatomic landmarks were measured. The forehead flaps were elevated using a coronal incision and divided with a midline incision for side-to-side comparison. Cadaver heads and side of surgical intervention were selected randomly. The flap tensions associated with incremental flap advancement of 0.5 and 1.0 cm were measured. Traction of 2.2 kg was then applied to each flap, and distances between the fixed landmarks were measured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean predissection and postdissection distance of brow and forehead elevation for each dissection type and mean distance and median tension of brow and forehead elevation within each group. RESULTS: The mean postdissection brow measurements at rest were significantly greater than the mean predissection measurements at most landmarks in all dissections for both groups (P<.05). The mean postdissection brow and forehead measurements with 2.2 kg of traction were significantly greater than the mean predissection measurements at all landmarks in all dissections for both groups (P<.05). The mean increase in distance from predissection to postdissection (at rest and with 2.2 kg of traction) did not significantly differ between the different dissection types (P>.05). For group 1, the median flap tension for subperiosteal dissection without release was greater than that for subperiosteal dissection with release (P>.05). For group 2, subperiosteal dissection with release had greater median flap tension than subgaleal dissection (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: All 3 methods of dissection significantly elevated the brow at rest for most landmarks. All 3 methods of dissection significantly elevated the brow and forehead when traction was applied to the flap. Brow and forehead elevation at rest and with 2.2 kg of traction did not significantly differ between the dissections. Subgaleal dissection was associated with less flap tension compared with the subperiosteal dissection with or without release. The data support the use of all 3 methods of forehead dissection for brow elevation and subgaleal forehead dissection as the optimal approach for the forehead lift, whether performed endoscopically or open.

Aged↗

Endoscopic forehead lift: review of technique, cases, and complications.

Endoscopy has provided a significant improvement in the surgical rejuvenation of the upper face. It offers a minimally invasive alternative that avoids many of the undesirable effects associated with the coronal approach. The standard minimal access forehead endoscopic procedure consists of a subperiosteal undermining through three small triangular prehairline incisions. To successfully elevate the eyebrows, it is essential to release the periosteum at the level of the supraorbital rims and ablate the brow depressor muscles of the glabella. Until the periosteum reattaches itself, elevation is maintained by a temporary suspension suture between staples at the incision sites and 5 cm posterior to the hairline. The transverse closure of the triangular skin incisions achieves some additional elevation. The biplanar approach adds a partial subcutaneous undermining of the forehead to the endoscopic technique and allows plication of the frontalis muscle and excision of excess forehead skin. It is offered to patients with very ptotic eyebrows, deep transverse wrinkles, or a high forehead. The prehairline incision is a disadvantage but is tolerated quite well in older patients. The medical records of 393 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic forehead lift from 1994 to 2000 were reviewed. Because seven patients had the endoscopic forehead lift repeated, the number of forehead endoscopies totaled 400. The complication rate was quite acceptable and did not markedly increase when a forehead lift was performed in combination with other facial procedures. The endoscopic forehead lift consistently attenuated the transverse forehead wrinkles, reduced the glabellar frown lines, and raised the eyebrows. It provided an appearance that was less tired and angry in addition to opening the area around the eyes. Long-term follow-up has shown that the endoscopic forehead lift produces lasting and predictable results.

Adolescent↗

Reconstruction of major forehead soft tissue defects with adjacent tissue and minimal scar formation.

Repair and reconstruction of soft tissue defects involving over 50% of the forehead using remaining forehead tissue has not been reported in the literature. The few existing reports mainly concern cases in which less than half of the forehead was involved. The forehead comprises one third of the face and with regard to its prominent position, it is one of the major contributing components to facial beauty. Considering the excellent color, thickness, and quality matching of the adjacent forehead skin, it is considered the ideal substitute for repair of forehead defects. Use of skin graft or free flaps for reconstruction of defects involving 50% or more of the forehead have not reported acceptable results because of the lack of similarity of the donor tissue with the remaining forehead tissue. In this study, we describe successful reconstruction of major forehead soft tissue defects of two thirds to three fourths of the forehead with use of a tissue expander and transverse supratrochlear pedicle flap in four patients who were diagnosed with giant hairy nevus. There were no serious complications such as hematoma, bleeding, infection, or flap necrosis. We recommend this technique for reconstruction of extensive forehead soft tissue defects.

Adolescent↗

Three-dimensional analysis of forehead wrinkles.

It is important to understand the anatomical characteristics of forehead wrinkles in order to perform a forehead lift. This study aimed to elucidate the mutual relationships among tissues composing the forehead using computer software that enables the stereoscopic observation of the tissues studied in arbitrary directions. The specimens were obtained from five cadavers and prepared in serial sagittal sections. Three-dimensional images were prepared by inputting the forehead wrinkle data obtained from serial sagittal sections. Consequently, the forehead skin was found to be fixed to the superficial galea aponeurotica through fibrous septa, suggesting that movement of the frontalis muscle would be transmitted to the skin, not through the fibrous septa alone, but from the superficial galea aponeurotica closely attached to the frontalis muscle through the fibrous septa. Since the forehead muscles exhibit a stereostructure where the corrugator supercilii muscle supports three superficial forehead muscles, including the frontalis muscle, the orbicularis oculi muscle, and procerus muscle on the periosteal side, it was presumed that a sufficient effect would not be attained unless the corrugator supercilii muscle was operated on concurrently in conjunction with these muscles during a procedure involving the superficial forehead muscles in a forehead lift. Based on the findings from the three-dimensional images obtained, effective tissue treatments could be achieved by performing (1) dissection between the superficial galea aponeurotica and the frontalis muscle, (2) dissection between the deep galea aponeurotica and the periosteum, and (3) a procedure incorporating the forehead muscles in order.

Aged↗

A new technique applying botulinum toxin in narrow and wide foreheads.

The use of botulinum toxin is becoming increasingly popular, and application details are being examined in an effort to achieve more satisfactory results with fewer side effects. In the forehead area, the main considerations are the effacement of forehead wrinkles to a desirable extent and the prevention of complications such as ptosis of the eyebrow and upper eyelid. The frontalis muscle necessitates chemodenervation by botulinum toxin at multiple points for the desired effect. The dimensions of foreheads, and thus the frontalis muscle, differ from patient to patient. The effectiveness and side effects change according to whether the forehead is narrow or a wide. Therefore, no single application technique is best for all patients. For this study, the glabella-hairline distance was measured in 90 healthy adults. Patients with a vertical forehead length exceeding 70 mm were regarded as having a wide forehead, and the botulinum toxin was applied in three vertical lines in two split doses. On the other hand, individuals with a vertical forehead length of less than 60 mm were regarded as having a narrow forehead, and the toxin was applied in two split doses in three horizontal lines. The authors have found that in cases of wide or narrow foreheads, the effectiveness of the toxin increased, whereas the side effects such as brow asymmetry and ptosis were not encountered. Thus, they recommend the use of this technique for patients with wide or narrow foreheads.

Adult↗

The forehead lift: endoscopic versus coronal approaches.

Rejuvenation surgery of the upper one-third of the face can be accomplished by a number of well-known techniques and approaches. The objectives of this study were to: (1) determine if endoscopic-assisted forehead lifts achieve the same degree of correction as the coronal/pretrichial forehead lifts, (2) to assess the effect of concurrent blepharoplasty on brow elevation, and (3) to evaluate long-term results of coronal/ pretrichial forehead lifts. The study was a retrospective blinded comparison of pre- and postoperative photographs of patients who underwent forehead lifts. In order to control for the differences in photographs, ratios of distances were measured utilizing standard anthropometric sites of the brow, medial canthus, and subnasale. All reviewed cases were operated on by the same surgeon (S.W. Perkins, M.D.). A total of 140 patients having undergone forehead lift procedures and with 12-month postoperative photographic documentation were included in the study. Of these 121 patients had coronal forehead lifts and 19 had endoscopic-assisted forehead lifts. Results revealed that at 1 year follow-up both methods achieved brow elevation without a significant difference in the approach. Concomitant blepharoplasty had no statistical effect on brow position. Additionally, long-term follow-up on the coronal/pretrichial lifts revealed a gradual drop in brow position over 5 years. We conclude that both endoscopic and coronal/pretrichial forehead lifts provide for comparable elevation at 1-year follow-up. Concomitant blepharoplasty has minimal to no significant effect on brow position. Brow elevation in coronal/pretrichial forehead lifts may be temporary.

Blepharoplasty↗

Forehead pulse oximetry: Headband use helps alleviate false low readings likely related to venous pulsation artifact.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether a tensioning headband that applies up to 20 mmHg pressure over a forehead pulse oximetry sensor could improve arterial hemoglobin oxygen saturation reading accuracy in presence of venous pooling and pulsations at the forehead site. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were studied breathing room air in supine and various levels of negative incline (Trendelenburg position) using the forehead sensor with the headband adjusted to its maximum and minimum recommended pressure limits. Saturation readings obtained from the forehead sensor with the subjects supine and the headband in place were used as a baseline to compare the effects of negative incline on reading accuracy when using and not using the headband. Occurrences of false low-saturation readings detected by forehead sensors were compared with those from digit sensors. RESULTS: No difference was observed between saturation readings obtained from the forehead sensor in supine and negative incline positions when the headband was applied. Forehead sensor readings obtained while subjects were inclined and the headband was not used were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than the supine readings. There was no statistically significant difference between the digit and forehead sensor in reporting false low-saturation readings when the headband was applied, regardless of body incline. CONCLUSIONS: Application of up to 20 mmHg pressure on the forehead pulse oximetry sensor using an elastic tensioning headband significantly reduced reading errors and provided consistent performance when subjects were placed between supine and up to 15 degrees head-down incline (Trendelenburg position).

Adolescent↗

Comparison of rectal, axillary, and forehead temperatures.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether axillary and forehead temperatures accurately reflect the rectal temperature (the criterion standard) DESIGN: Prospective study with calculation of paired axillary-rectal and forehead-rectal temperature differences and their SDs. SETTING: Referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 120 patients, with 20 patients in each of six age groups (ie, < 1 month, 1 to 5 months, 6 to 11 months, 12 to 23 months, 2 to 14 years, and adults) RESULTS: In newborns, the rectal temperature was equal to the axillary temperature plus 0.2 degrees C for each week of age up to 5 weeks; forehead strip thermometers gave inaccurate readings in this age group. In patients older than 1 month, the mean difference (SD) between the rectal and axillary temperatures was 1.04 degrees C (0.45 degrees C); thus the axillary temperature was adjusted by adding 1 degree C, and no adjusted axillary temperature differed from the rectal temperature by more than 1 degree C. The mean difference (SD) between the forehead temperature that was measured by the best forehead liquid crystal strip thermometer (FeverScan) and the rectal temperature was 0.14 degrees C (0.60 degrees C); 10 forehead temperatures differed from the rectal temperature by more than 1 degree C. CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies that have suggested that axillary and forehead temperatures do not provide a reliable guide to the rectal temperature have all used inappropriate methods of analysis (correlation coefficients or sensitivity and specificity); previous studies that have based their conclusions on the correct method of analysis (paired differences and their SDs) have all found that the axillary temperature gives a good indication of the rectal temperature. The axillary temperature can be measured safely at any age, and the axillary temperature plus 1 degree C is a good guide to the rectal temperature in patients older than 1 month. Forehead strip thermometers are easy to use, but they do not estimate the rectal temperature as accurately as the axillary temperature does.

Adolescent↗