PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “French Revolution”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1993

[History of professionalization of modern clinical pharmacist (2): reformation of medical systems before and after the French Revolution].

Paradoxically the medical reformation at the French Revolution is based on two concepts; one was the free medical and pharmaceutical practices without professional licence and another was the nationalistic centralization. The newborn nationalistically centralized institution was applied simultaneously in the field of politics and modern medicine. The physicians of "Société Royale de Médecine" started to investigate the epidemic diseases all over France in 1778. After the French Revolution, it soon developed into a larger public organization that represented the knowledge of medicine and the collegiate mind of the Société shared among the practicioners.

Clinical Medicine↗
PubMed1993

[History of professionalization of modern clinical pharmacist (1): pharmaceutical practices in hospice before the French Revolution].

The times around the French Revolution, as E. H. Ackerknecht pointed out, were especially epochmaking in that "the clinical medicine" or 'medicine in the hospital' was born and bred through the days by discarding the medicine of court physicians and the metaphysical medicine that had been dominant for centuries until then. This change is, therefore, very important from the viewpoints of sociopolitical, cultural and medical histories. The medicine practised and taught mainly in Paris in those days based politically on the newborn nationalistic centralization; technically on pathologicoanatomy and biostatistics; and conceptually on the modern medical epistemologoy that made it possible to abstract and see a 'disease' from the sick by observation, description and classification of their common signs and symptoms, and then to ignore a suffering specific to each individual patient instead. Thus those who could believe in the être (entity) of a 'disease' the clinical medicine made it 'visible' were trained for medical professionals such as modern physicians, surgeons and clinical pharmacists, which finally realized the professional monopolization of the medicine. The aim of this paper is to report and analyze the historical process how there came out the modern clinical pharmacist who was permitted by the nation as the only occupation to deal in ethical drugs in the hospital, while excluding many other people who had been treating 'traditional medicines' from the modern pharmacies of hospitals.

Clinical Medicine↗
PubMed1997

[The French Revolution and mental troubles 1789-1799].

Are wars and political strife factors in the cause of mental diseases? For instance what do we know about the French Revolution? Contemporary writers of memoirs are untrustworthy, whether opponents or supporters. We have neither morbiditiy nor mortality statistics nor accurate diagnostics, for the patients in public hospitals or private mental homes. A few cases are described for some mystical or political lunatic women, and some Jacobin leaders. The "psychiatrists" of that time have not noticed any increasing of insanity: a revolution is not enough to provoke mental disease, but it may reveal it.

Civil Disorders↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Pierre-François Nicolas (1743-1816), apothecary, physician, chemistry teacher on the eve of the French Revolution].

Pierre-François Nicolas, was born in Saint-Mihiel in 1743, studied in this town and in St-Nicolas-de-Port near Nancy. At first he has been a military apothecary during the "Guerre de Sept-Ans". Then he studied pharmacy in Nancy and was received in 1768 at the "Maîtrise de pharmacie". With the physician Henri Michel du Tennatar, he created a teaching of chemistry for medicine students and became the professor of chemistry of the Faculty of Medicine in 1781. During these years, he published some research results about hydrology, distillery, biochemistry (phosphorus in bone), toxicology, dyeing... At the end of 1783, he succeeded in the realization of a balloon and he played an important part in Nancy during the French Revolution. Professor at the "Ecole de médecine" in Strasbourg for some weeks, then in Nancy at the "Ecole centrale" and at the "Société de santé", he left Nancy towards the mid-1798. Staying in Paris for two or three years he probably worked with Fourcroy and perhaps Chaptal and Berthollet. In the early years of the nineteenth century he was appointed professor in the "Ecole centrale" du Calvados" and some years after at the "Faculté des sciences" in Caen. His latest significant work with Gueudeville was devoted to the detection of sugar in the urine of diabetic patients. Retired in 1811 Pierre-François Nicolas died in Caen in 1816.

Chemistry↗
PubMed1992

Ophthalmology in Europe in the days of the French Revolution.

The authors highlight the political and scientific landmarks in 18th century France; the Revolution of 1789 had positive effects, in that it marked the accession of the French middle-class to political power and enabled the promotion of young scientists without consideration of social class or fortune; it had negative effects, in that France lost the scientific edge it had gained when all existing chairs in ophthalmology were abolished. The status of ophthalmology and of physiological optics in the 18th century are discussed, with a brief mention of the most important innovators in the field.

Europe↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Priesthood and pharmacy in France after the French Revolution].

Contrary to Tournier's assertion (thesis of 1938), the law of germinal (the seventh month of the eleventh year of the French Republican Calendar) had not been respected by the regular/secular priesthood because it was so ambiguous that they could seize the opportunity to carry on practising the art of medicine or manufacturing and selling drugs. In fact there were three reasons for the lack of steadiness of authorities: the practice of charity, financial concerns and the rise of the science which incited to illegal practice of pharmacy although professionals protested against. On the other hand, the priesthood officials tardily took the decision of forbidding the practice of medicine, surgery and pharmacy until 1936 when it was anew forbidden after a meeting of French cardinals and bishops. In 1941, with the agreement of all concerned persons the problem came to its end.

Clergy↗