PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD)”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

[A case of schizophreniform disorder in frontotemporal dementia (FTD)].

The concept of frontotemporal lobar degeneration comprises a heterogenous group of cortical dementias, including frontotemporal dementia, as the major clinical variant. Because of their highly variable clinical presentation, to establish the diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia could be a diagnostic challenge for the clinician. Here we report a 53 years old caucasian male patient who was admitted for hospitalization due to acute severe schizophrenia-like symptoms. The leading symptomatology comprised acoustic and bizarre optical hallucinations with euphoria and self-overestimation. Remission of the psychotic symptoms demasked the clinical picture of a rapidly progressive frontotemporal dementia with marked apathy, indifference, emotional blunting, loss of insight, change of personality and typical cognitive impairment. The diagnosis was supported by the results of cerebral MRI and FDG-18 PET. This first clinical manifestation of a schizophrenia-like syndrome in the 6th life decade implicates frontotemporal dementia as an important differential diagnosis of schizophrenic disorders in late life. In addition of basically thinking about frontotemporal dementia, a detailed medical history, cognitive testing, neuroimaging and eventually the evaluation of the further disease course are necessary to establish a diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia.

Acute Disease↗

Chromosome 3 linked frontotemporal dementia (FTD-3).

BACKGROUND: The authors have identified and studied a large kindred in which frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait. The trait has been mapped to the pericentromeric region of chromosome 3. METHODS: The authors report on the clinical, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, and pathologic features in this unique pedigree collected during 17 years of study. RESULTS: Twenty-two individuals in three generations have been affected; the age at onset varies between 46 and 65 years. The disease presents with a predominantly frontal lobe syndrome but there is also evidence for temporal and dominant parietal lobe dysfunction. Late in the illness individuals develop a florid motor syndrome with pyramidal and extrapyramidal features. Structural imaging reveals generalized cerebral atrophy; H2 15 O-PET scanning in two individuals relatively early and late in the disease shows a striking global reduction in cerebral blood flow affecting all lobes. On macroscopic pathologic examination, there is generalized cerebral atrophy affecting the frontal lobes preferentially. Microscopically, there is neuronal loss and gliosis without specific histopathologic features. CONCLUSIONS: FTD-3 shares clinical and pathologic features with other forms of FTD and fulfills international consensus criteria for FTD. There is involvement of the parietal lobes clinically, radiologically, and pathologically in FTD-3 in contrast to some forms of FTD. This more diffuse involvement of the cerebral cortex leads to a distinctive, global pattern of reduced blood flow on PET scanning.

Autopsy↗

Diagnostic patterns of regional atrophy on MRI and regional cerebral blood flow change on SPECT in young onset patients with Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia and vascular dementia.

OBJECTIVES: Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and vascular dementia (VaD) are the three most common causes of young onset dementias. Most neuroimaging studies of these disorders have involved comparisons with normal controls. The aims of this study were to examine the clinical diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (in combination and in isolation) in the differentiation of one form of dementia from another from amongst a group of AD, FTD and VaD. METHODS: T1 weighted MRI images and 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT images were obtained from consecutive patients with FTD (n=21), AD (n=23) and VaD (n=20) and rated visually by experienced neuroradiologists and nuclear medicine physicians. RESULTS: Asymmetrical atrophy was seen only in FTD. Frontotemporal dementia patients were the most atrophic whereas severe atrophy was rarely observed in VaD. Severe frontal atrophy (unilaterally or bilaterally) and/or asymmetrical atrophy on MRI is highly diagnostic (sensitivity 0.71, specificity 0.93, LR 10.24) of FTD from within a group of FTD and non-FTD (AD, VaD) patients. Mild or severe parietal atrophy with severe reduction in parietal regional cerebral blood flow on SPECT is diagnostic (sensitivity 0.71, specificity 0.76, LR 3.02) of AD from within a group of AD and non-AD (VaD, FTD) patients. CONCLUSION: Anatomical (MRI) and functional (SPECT) imaging provide different information and a combination of these modalities improves diagnostic specificity.

Aged↗

Frontotemporal dementia.

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is an uncommon but important form of degenerative disease. It may make up 50% of dementia cases presenting before age 60. The symptoms are related to the anatomic areas affected. Neary divided the clinical syndromes into "frontotemporal dementia," "progressive nonfluent aphasia," and "semantic dementia." However, the pathology may extend beyond the frontal and temporal lobes and additional symptoms may be found. Although most cases are sporadic, some cases are genetic. The best-known genetic mutation causing FTD is frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism, linked to the microtubule-associated protein tau on chromosome 17. There are other known genes and chromosome loci related to FTD. The most common pathology found is frontotemporal degeneration with ubiquitin inclusions. In contrast, FTD with Pick bodies is rare. Although there are strategies to help patients and their families, there is no known treatment for the disease.

Aphasia, Primary Progressive↗

A novel mutation at position +12 in the intron following exon 10 of the tau gene in familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD-Kumamoto)

Exonic and intronic mutations in the tau gene cause familial frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17. Here, we describe a new mutation, consisting of a C-to-T transition at position +12 of the intron following exon 10 of the tau gene in the Kumamoto pedigree, showing frontotemporal dementia. The mutation caused a marked reduction in melting temperature of the tau exon 10-splicing regulatory element RNA and a large increase in exon 10-containing transcripts. Brain tissue from affected individuals showed an abnormal preponderance of exon 10-containing transcripts that was reflected at the protein level by an overproduction of tau isoforms with four microtubule-binding repeats. Immunostaining revealed the presence of tau aggregates in degenerating neurons and glial cells. Isolated tau filaments had a twisted ribbon-like morphology and were made of hyperphosphorylated four-repeat tau isoforms. The additional mutation located dose to the splice-donor site of the intron following exon 10 of the tau gene supports the view that intronic mutations exercize their pathogenic effect by destabilizing RNA secondary structure.

Brain↗

A systematic review of neurotransmitter deficits and treatments in frontotemporal dementia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate neurotransmitter deficiencies and neurotransmitter-based treatments for frontotemporal dementia (FTD). METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of the literature on the mechanism and treatment of FTD and a meta-analysis of treatment studies of antidepressants for the behavioral symptoms of FTD. RESULTS: Patients with FTD show deficiencies in the serotonin and dopamine neurotransmitter systems, while the acetylcholine system appears relatively intact. Antidepressant treatment significantly improves behavioral symptoms in FTD, but most studies are small and uncontrolled. Serotonergic treatments appear to improve the behavioral but not cognitive symptoms of FTD. CONCLUSIONS: Studies of neurotransmitter deficiencies in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) can be helpful in developing treatments. Treatment studies on FTD are scarce, given the prevalence and severity of this illness. Larger, well-controlled treatment studies are required to reach more definitive conclusions about treatment efficacy. Multicenter studies are likely the best way to complete treatment studies in a timely manner.

Antidepressive Agents↗

Which neuropsychiatric and behavioural features distinguish frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease?

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of changes in mood, personality, and behaviour in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) and hence, which features reliably distinguish between them. To establish whether the frontal and temporal variants of FTD are characterised by different behavioural changes. METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to assess a wide range of neuropsychiatric changes; it incorporated features reported in previous studies of FTD and components of the neuropsychiatric inventory.(1) This was completed by 37 carers of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 33 patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), comprising 20 with temporal variant FTD (tv FTD) or semantic dementia and 13 with frontal variant FTD (fv FTD). An exploratory principal components factor analysis and discriminant function analysis was applied. RESULTS: Factor analysis showed four robust and meaningful symptom clusters: factor 1-stereotypic and eating behaviour; factor 2-executive dysfunction and self care; factor 3-mood changes; factor 4-loss of social awareness. Only stereotypic and altered eating behaviour and loss of social awareness reliably differentiated AD from FTD with no effect of disease severity. By contrast, executive dysfunction, poor self care, and restlessness showed a significant effect of disease severity only, with the more impaired patients scoring more highly. Changes in mood were found to be equally prevalent in the three patient groups. Analysis of individual symptoms showed increased rates of mental rigidity and depression in the patients with semantic dementia compared with those with fv FTD. Conversely, the latter group showed greater disinhibition. Discriminant function analysis correctly classified 71.4% overall and 86.5% of the patients with AD. CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire disclosed striking differences between patients with FTD and AD, but only stereotypic behaviour, changes in eating preference, disinhibition, and features of poor social awareness reliably separated the groups. The patients with fv FTD and semantic dementia were behaviourally very similar, reflecting the involvement of a common network, the ventral frontal lobe, temporal pole, and amygdala. Dysexecutive symptoms and poor self care were found to be affected by the severity of the disease, reflecting perhaps spread to dorsolateral prefrontal areas relatively late in the course of both FTD and AD. This questionnaire may be of value in the diagnosis and the monitoring of therapies.

Aged↗

A large Calabrian kindred segregating frontotemporal dementia.

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) displays significant neuropathological and genetic heterogeneity among and within affected families. An early diagnosis is often difficult because cognitive symptoms are manifest only at a late stage of the disease. We have been studying a large pedigree segregating frontotemporal dementia (FTD) to which belong 34 identified affected persons, 11 of whom were personally examined. The kindred has been genealogically reconstructed; all FTD patients have been linked to the same ancestors who lived in the early 18(th) century (11 generations before the present one). Autosomal dominant transmission was evident. Clinical features were uniform within the kindred and met the Lund-Manchester criteria. Personality changes with absence of insight, lack of empathy and of social awareness manifested up to 5 years before medical advice was sought. Loss of fluency was the earliest neuropsychological sign, in the absence of memory, orientation and praxis deficits, which evolved late, together with hyperorality. Akinesia was observed early, rigidity appeared late, tremor was absent. Two patients showed myoclonus late in their evolution. No ALS signs were observed in this kindred. Mutations of the MAPt gene, coding for the Tau protein, were not detected in affected family members. Linkage studies excluded chromosomes 3 and 9 and gave indeterminate results that were model dependent for chromosome 17.

Adult↗

Rate of progression differs in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease.

OBJECTIVE: To compare survival and rates of cognitive and functional decline in patients with autopsy-confirmed frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer disease (AD) in a large multicenter study. BACKGROUND: Despite advances in the clinical characterization of FTD, little is known about its rate of progression. Characterizing survival and rate of decline in FTD is important because it can provide prognostic guidelines and benchmarks to use in the evaluation of disease-modifying drugs. METHODS: Seventy patients with FTD and 70 patients with AD who were followed by seven Alzheimer disease research centers until confirmation of diagnosis at autopsy were matched for overall age, education, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score at initial evaluation. Survival and rates of cognitive and functional decline were compared. RESULTS: Patients with FTD had significantly shorter survival from initial evaluation to death than patients with AD (FTD = 4.2 years, AD = 6.0 years; log-rank test = 5.17, p < 0.05), and they declined significantly faster over one year on the MMSE (mean annual rate of change: -6.7 points for FTD vs -2.3 points for AD). A significantly greater proportion of patients with FTD were impaired in basic activities of daily living (ADLs) at initial evaluation, and lost the capacity for independent or minimally-assisted ADLs over the subsequent year. CONCLUSIONS: The results are consistent with shorter survival and faster rates of cognitive and functional decline in patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) compared to those with Alzheimer disease (AD). This suggests that FTD follows a more malignant disease course than AD once dementia is clinically recognized.

Activities of Daily Living↗

[Neuropsychology of frontal type dementia].

The clinical conceptual change in frontal type dementia is reviewed in discussing its relationships to several related concepts such as Pick's disease, frontotemporal dementia (FTD), semantic dementia (SD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. We analyzed frontal type dementia selected from a consecutive series of our outpatients as to the details of neuropsychological symptoms, psychiatric symptoms, and abnormal behaviors. In our series of 143 patients with primary degenerative dementia, there were 16 cases of FTD and 6 cases of SD. Patients with two types of FTD and patients with SD were not distinguishable by neuropsychological examinations, behavioral abnormalities and psychiatric symptoms assessed with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory except for aphasia. The clinical picture of frontal type dementia involves frontal lobe symptoms such as disinhibition, apathy and stereotypy. Semantic memory loss for words, objects or faces suggestive of temporal lobe involvement developed only in patients with SD, and not in patients with FTD. Certain behavioral symptoms seen in frontal type dementia may respond to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. In care for patients with frontal type dementia, behavioral disturbances can be diminished and the quality of life can be improved by using their preserved procedural memory, pathological stereotypic behavior and stimulus-bound behavior such as utilization behavior and environmental dependency syndrome.

Dementia↗

Clinicopathologic analysis of frontotemporal and corticobasal degenerations and PSP.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between early clinical features, pathologies, and biochemistry of the frontotemporal lobar degenerations (FTLDs), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and corticobasal degeneration (CBD). METHODS: The authors conducted pathologic reexamination with the most recent immunohistochemistry of all cases diagnosed with FTLD, PSP, and CBD between 1970 and 2004. The authors also reviewed the early clinical features for clinical diagnosis and application of published research criteria. RESULTS: Of 127 cases analyzed, 57 had a pathologic diagnosis of FTLD, 49 PSP, and 21 CBD. Of these, 38 were clinically reclassified as frontal variant frontotemporal dementia (FTD), 13 as progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA), 21 as CBD-like, 33 as PSP-like, and 13 with frontotemporal dementia with coexisting motor neuron disease (FTD-MND). The authors were unable to classify nine cases. All cases of FTD-MND were tau-negative and had pathologic evidence of motor neuron degeneration. All cases classified as PSP-like or CBD-like had tau-positive pathology. Of the 13 cases with PNFA, PSP and CBD accounted for almost 70% of the cases, while FTD was almost equally divided between tau-positive and tau-negative diseases. CONCLUSION: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration, corticobasal degeneration (CBD), and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) have overlapping clinical features. The prediction of tau-positive pathology from a CBD or PSP-like presentation is good, while the frontotemporal dementia (FTD)-motor neuron disease syndrome almost certainly predicts motor neuron degeneration. Surprisingly, PSP and CBD accounted for most cases classified as progressive non-fluent aphasia. Frontal variant FTD is an unpredictable disease in terms of its biochemistry.

Aged↗

Familial frontotemporal dementia with ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative inclusions.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical features, neuropathology, and genetic studies in a family with autosomal dominant frontotemporal dementia (FTD). BACKGROUND: Clinical Pick's disease, or FTD with parkinsonism, has been described in several families linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17). Most of these have shown tau protein mutations. The clinical and pathologic variations in these families resemble the spectrum of sporadic FTD or "Pick complex." METHODS: Clinical and behavioral analysis of the affected members with extensive histochemical and neuropathologic description of three cases, genetic analysis of three clinically affected members and seven at risk members to assess linkage to chromosome 17, and sequencing of the tau gene in two patients were performed. RESULTS: The clinical pattern shows a highly stereotypic disinhibition dementia with late extrapyramidal features, progressive mutism, and terminal dysphagia in three generations of affected individuals. Neuropathology showed frontotemporal atrophy, and microscopically tau- and synuclein-negative and ubiquitin-positive neuronal inclusions, in the background of superficial cortical spongiosis, neuronal loss, and gliosis. Tau expression was restricted to oligodendroglia. All exons and surrounding introns of the tau gene were sequenced, and no mutation or disease-related polymorphisms were detected in either of two affected pedigree members. CONCLUSION: This family with autosomal dominant frontotemporal dementia (FTD) shows no tau expression in neurons. The ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative inclusions have been described before in FTD with and without motor neuron disease, but not in a familial form. The clinical and some pathologic features are similar to those of several of the families included in descriptions of FTD with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17, but the linkage to tau has been excluded. The defect in this family, however, could be functionally related to tau mutations.

Adult↗

Variations in regional SPECT hypoperfusion and clinical features in frontotemporal dementia.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the presenting clinical features for frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and contrast them with the degree of frontal and temporal hypoperfusion on SPECT imaging. METHODS: The authors evaluated 74 patients who eventually met Consensus Criteria for the FTD form of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (excluding primary progressive aphasia and semantic dementia) on 2-year follow-up. On first presentation, these patients had undergone both an FTD Inventory for 12 features based on core and supportive Consensus Criteria and SPECT imaging. The initial clinical diagnostic features were contrasted with variations in regional SPECT hypoperfusion. RESULTS: The patients with FTD had more hypoperfusion in the right frontal lobe than in other regions; the subgroup of 25 patients who met Consensus Criteria from the first presentation had the most right frontal hypoperfusion. Frontal lobe involvement was associated with significant apathy, whereas temporal lobe involvement was associated with hypomania-like behavior. Right frontal lobe hypoperfusion further predicted loss of insight, environmental dependency, and stereotyped behaviors. Other associations included left frontal hypoperfusion with a decline in personal hygiene and left temporal hypoperfusion with compulsions and mental rigidity. CONCLUSIONS: On first presentation, frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is disproportionately a right frontal disease evident on behavioral measures and on SPECT. Nonetheless, patients with FTD can initially present with further regional differences in clinical diagnostic features, such as apathy with bifrontal hypoperfusion and hypomania-like behaviors with anterior temporal involvement.

Brain↗

Frontotemporal dementia and tauopathy.

The presence of abundant neurofibrillary lesions made of hyperphosphorylated tau proteins is the characteristic neuropathology of a subset of neurodegenerative disorders classified as "tauopathies." The discovery of mutations in the tau gene in frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17) constitutes convincing evidence that tau proteins play a key role in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders. Moreover, it now is known that the most common form of sporadic frontotemporal dementia (FTD), which is characterized by frontotemporal neuron loss, gliosis, and microvacuolar change, also is a tauopathy caused by a loss of tau protein expression. Thus, these discoveries have begun to change the classification and the neuropathologic diagnosis of FTD and tauopathies, as well as current understanding of the disease mechanisms underlying them. Although transgenic mice expressing wild-type human tau or variants thereof with an FTDP-17 mutation result in tau pathologies and brain degeneration similar to that seen in human tauopathies, the precise mechanisms leading to the onset and progression of neurodegenerative disorders remain incompletely understood. Here, we review current understanding of human neurodegenerative tauopathies and prospects for translative recent insights about these into therapeutic interventions to prevent or ameliorate them.

Dementia↗

Comprehensive cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light across FTD spectrum disorders.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic development for frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is hindered by the lack of biomarkers that inform susceptibility/risk, prognosis, and the underlying causative pathology. Blood glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) has garnered attention as a FTD biomarker. However, investigations of GFAP in FTD have been hampered by symptomatic and histopathologic heterogeneity and small cohort sizes contributing to inconsistent findings. Therefore, we evaluated plasma GFAP as a FTD biomarker and compared its performance to that of neurofilament light (NfL) protein, a leading FTD biomarker. METHODS: We availed ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) study resources to conduct a comprehensive cross-sectional and longitudinal examination of the susceptibility/risk, prognostic, and predictive performance of GFAP and NfL in the largest series of well-characterized presymptomatic FTD mutation carriers and participants with sporadic or familial FTD syndromes. Utilizing single molecule array technology, we measured GFAP and NfL in plasma from 161 controls, 127 presymptomatic mutation carriers, 702 participants with a FTD syndrome, and 67 participants with mild behavioral and/or cognitive changes. We used multivariable linear regression and Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for co-variates to examine the biomarker utility of baseline GFAP and NfL concentrations or their rates of change. RESULTS: Compared to controls, GFAP and NfL were elevated in each FTD syndrome but GFAP, unlike NfL, poorly discriminated controls from participants with mild symptoms. Similarly, both baseline GFAP and NfL were higher in presymptomatic mutation carriers who later phenoconverted, but NfL better distinguished non-converters from phenoconverters. We additionally observed that GFAP and NfL were associated with disease severity indicators and survival, but NfL far outperformed GFAP. Nevertheless, we validated findings that the GFAP/NfL ratio may discriminate frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau versus TDP-43 pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Our head-to-head comparison of plasma GFAP and NfL as biomarkers for FTD indicate that NfL consistently outmatched GFAP as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for participants with a FTD syndrome, and as a susceptibility/risk biomarker for people at genetic risk of FTD. Our findings underscore the need to include leading biomarkers in investigations evaluating new biomarkers if the field is to fully ascertain their performance and clinical value.

Humans↗

Tau protein in frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 3 (FTD-3).

Recent work on frontotemporal dementia (FTD) has revealed the existence of at least 3 genetically distinct groups of inherited FTD: FTDP-17, FTD and motor neuron disease linked to chromosome 9, and FTD linked to chromosome 3 (FTD-3). Tau, on chromosome 17, is the only gene where mutations have been identified and its involvement in FTD has been firmly established. The genes on chromosome 9 and chromosome 3 associated with familial forms of FTD remain to be identified. Abnormal aggregates of tau protein characterize the brain lesions of FTDP-17 patients and ubiquitin inclusions have been found in FTD with motor neuron disease linked to chromosome 9. In this study the frontal cortices of 3 FTD-3 patients from a unique Danish family were examined for characteristic neuropathological features. In these brains tau inclusions were present in neurons and some glial cells in the absence of beta-amyloid deposits. The presence of filamentous tau protein in the frontal cortex of these patients suggests a possible link between tau and the genetic defect present on chromosome 3 and associated with FTD-3, although the limited amount of tau deposits observed makes it difficult to define this as a tauopathy.

Aged↗

Hypoperfusion in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease by arterial spin labeling MRI.

OBJECTIVES: To test if arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI could detect a pattern of hypoperfusion in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) vs cognitively normal (CN) control subjects; to determine the regional difference of perfusion between FTD and Alzheimer disease (AD); and to determine whether hypoperfusion in FTD correlates with cognitive impairment. METHODS: We included 21 patients with FTD, 24 patients with AD, and 25 CN subjects in this cross-sectional MRI study. All subjects had MRI scans including T1-weighted structural images and ASL-MR images. RESULTS: ASL-MRI detected a pattern of hypoperfusion in right frontal regions in patients with FTD vs CN subjects, similar to PET and SPECT. FTD had higher perfusion than AD in the parietal regions and posterior cingulate. Frontal hypoperfusion in FTD correlated with deficits in judgment and problem solving. Adding frontal perfusion to gray matter (GM) atrophy significantly improved the classification of FTD from normal aging to 74%, and adding parietal perfusion to GM atrophy significantly improved the classification of FTD from AD to 75%. Combining frontal and parietal lobe perfusion further improved the classification of FTD from AD to 87%. CONCLUSION: Frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease display different spatial distributions of hypoperfusion on arterial spin labeling MRI. With further development and evaluation, arterial spin labeling MRI could contribute to the differential diagnosis between frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease.

Adult↗

Polymorphisms in the tau gene in sporadic frontotemporal dementia and other neurodegenerative disorders.

The tau gene on chromosome 17 is fundamental in the pathogenesis of a number of neurodegenerative disorders. Mutations in tau are found in familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and the A0/A0 genotype associated with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). This study investigates the hypothesis that polymorphisms in the tau gene are associated with sporadic FTD. Western Australian populations of patients with sporadic frontotemporal dementia, PSP, Alzheimer's disease (AD), Huntington's disease (HD) and normal controls were studied. A new method was developed using fluorescently labelled probes to determine polymorphisms in the GT repeat region of intron 9. The A0/A0 genotype was found in 95% of PSP patients (n=20), 58.3% of FTD patients (n=48), 60.8% of AD patients (n=52), 75% of HD patients (n=40), and 75% of normal controls (n=40). None of these differences in genotype frequency were found to be significant by the Fisher exact test (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the frequencies of A0/A3 and A0/A1 haplotypes. We have not observed a significant increase in the A0/A0 genotype frequency in sporadic frontotemporal dementia suggesting that this polymorphism is unlikely to be related to the development of this condition. Furthermore, we have observed an increase in the A0/A0 genotype in PSP which did not reach statistical significance, suggesting that there may be population differences in the role of genetic factors in conferring risks to neurodegenerative disorders. Our work does not exclude that tau may interact with other genetic factors.

Age Factors↗