PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “General dermatology”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Serum thyroid hormone concentrations and thyrotropin responsiveness in dogs with generalized dermatologic disease.

Fifty-eight dogs with generalized dermatologic disease that had not been given glucocorticoids systemically or topically within 6 weeks of entering the study were evaluated for thyroid function by use of the thyrotropin-response test. Dogs were classified as euthyroid or hypothyroid on the basis of test results and response to thyroid hormone replacement therapy. Baseline serum thyroxine (T4), free T4 (fT4), and triiodothyronine (T3) concentrations were evaluated in the 58 dogs. Serum T4, fT4, and T3 concentrations were evaluated in 200 healthy dogs to establish normal values. Hormone concentrations were considered low if they were less than the mean -2 SD of the values for control dogs. Specificity of T4 and fT4 concentrations was 100% in predicting hypothyroidism; none of the euthyroid dogs with generalized skin disease had baseline serum T4 or fT4 concentration in the low range. Sensitivity was better for fT4 (89%) than for T4 (44%) concentration. Significant difference was not observed in serum T4 and fT4 concentrations between euthyroid dogs with generalized skin disease and healthy control dogs without skin disease. Serum T3 concentration was not accurate in predicting thyroid function; most of the euthyroid and hypothyroid dogs with skin disease had serum T3 concentration within the normal range.

Animals↗

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy for cutaneous malignant melanoma between general dermatology, plastic surgery and pigmented lesion clinics.

BACKGROUND: Since the 1980s there have been dedicated pigmented lesion clinics (PLCs) in the U.K. Important considerations when comparing the efficacy of the PLC with other referral clinics include diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVES: To compare the false-negative rate of clinical diagnosis (FNR) in the PLC with that in the other clinics of primary referral of malignant melanoma (MM) in the same geographical area. We have previously shown that certain clinical features are risk factors for diagnostic failure of MM. A further aim of this study was to correct for any differences in frequency of these factors in the melanoma populations between clinics and to estimate the false-positive diagnostic rate (FPR) in the PLC. METHODS: To compare the FNR between clinics, the case notes of all patients presenting with histologically proven cutaneous MM in Leicestershire between 1987 and 1997 were examined retrospectively. A false-negative diagnosis was defined as documentation of another diagnosis and/or evidence in the case notes that the diagnosis was not considered to be MM. The FNR was estimated as the number of false-negative clinical diagnoses/number of true-positive histological diagnoses. To estimate the diagnostic FPR, which was defined as the number of false-positive clinical diagnoses of MM/total number of positive clinical diagnoses, in the PLC, the outcome of 500 consecutive patients attending the PLC was surveyed. RESULTS: The case notes of 731 patients were available, of whom approximately two-thirds initially attended the PLC, one-fifth the General Dermatology clinics (D) and the remainder were divided approximately equally (one-twentieth each) between Plastic Surgery clinics (P), other clinics (O) and the surgery of the general practitioner (GP). The last was regarded as the primary referral clinic if the lesion were excised there prior to any referral. The FNR was lowest for the PLC, at 10%, compared with 29% (D), 19% (P), 55% (O) and 54% (GP) (P < 0.0001). Lesions with risk factors for diagnostic failure were under-represented in the PLC (P < 0.0001), the mean frequencies of the risk factors being 20% (PLC), 25% (D), 22% (P), 31% (O) and 30% (GP). Differences were not large but still could partially explain the lower FNR of the PLC. However, when the FNR was estimated for lesions exhibiting each of these risk factors, the PLC was found to have the lowest rate in every case (PLC vs. all clinics combined, P = 0.04 to P < 0.0001). The mean FNR for the risk factors combined was 18% (PLC), 45% (D), 50% (P), 68% (O) and 71% (GP). Also on logistic multivariable analysis of the PLC vs. all the other clinics on FNR and the above factors, the higher FNR of the other clinics retained significance (odds ratio 5.9, P < 0.0001). In the 500 patients surveyed separately in the PLC, the MM pick-up rate on biopsy was 32% and the diagnostic FPR was 41%. CONCLUSIONS: The FNR of MM was lower in the PLC than in the other clinics, while the pick-up rate for MM on biopsy and the FPR were acceptably low.

Aged↗

Allergic contact dermatitis from the preservative 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one (1,2-BIT; Proxel): a case report, its prevalence in those occupationally at risk and in the general dermatological population, and its relationship to allergy to its analogue Kathon CG.

Occupational contact allergy to 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one (1,2-BIT, Proxel) is analysed. This compound is widely used in industry as a preservative in water-based solutions such as pastes, paints and cutting oils. The optimal concentration for patch testing proved to be 0.4 g/l (0.04%) in water. In 4 out of 17 patients (23%) at occupational risk (painters, paper-hangers), contact allergy to 1,2-BIT was found. Of 556 consecutive dermatological patients without clear occupational risk, 10 (1.8%) showed positive patch tests to 1,2-BIT; in 3 patients 1,2-BIT contact allergy was related to domestic paper-hanging. Although the chemical structure of 1,2-BIT shows some analogy with the preservative Kathon CG, true cross-sensitivity was found to be unlikely.

Adult↗

Dermoscopy in general dermatology.

Dermoscopy improves the diagnostic accuracy in the clinical evaluation of pigmented skin lesions, but it is also useful for the assessment of vascular structures that are not visible to the naked eye. As a consequence, dermoscopy has been employed more and more for the differential diagnosis of nonpigmented skin disorders, including tumors but also inflammatory and infectious diseases. This article provides a review of the dermoscopic features seen in various nonpigmented tumoral and nontumoral skin lesions as well as the dermoscopic criteria used for monitoring skin reactions to various treatments.

Algorithms↗

General dermatologic use of hydroxamic acid.

Fifty clinic patients with mild to moderately severe dermatoses were treated for three weeks with bufexamac, a hydroxamic acid compound with anti-inflammatory properties. Half the patients had either contact or seborrheic dermatitis; the remaining 25 were distributed among five other diagnostic categories. Evaluation and grading of signs and symptoms were done at initial visit; changes resulting from topical treatment with bufexamac cream were monitored at weekly intervals. Forty-three (86%) patients had a good or very good response; seven were treatment failures. In terms of weighted response scores, those of patients with seborrheic, contact, or solar dermatitis were above the median for all scores, with lesser intensity of efficacy in the remaining diagnostic groups. Clinical cures were noted in 20 patients by week 2, in 17 by week 3, and six by the fourth or fifth week. No side effects were reported.

Adolescent↗

Dermatology in general practice.

A significant percentage of the workload of a general practitioner is dermatological. This study has analysed the cases seen by one partner in a semirural practice over a 5-year period. Of a total of 11,191 patients seen, 2386 had a dermatological diagnosis (21%). There was a preponderance of females (1604, 67%) and the most common skin diseases seen were viral warts, eczema and benign tumours. Surgical intervention was carried out in 707 cases, an atypical situation for most general practitioners. It was only because of additional training as a hospital practitioner in dermatology that the partner treated both benign and malignant tumours where she felt confident to do so. The incidence of skin cancer was 3% and 22 patients were referred to a dermatology outpatient department.

Eczema↗