PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Geriatric Assessment”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Medicare reimbursement for geriatric assessment: report of the American Geriatrics Society Ad Hoc Committee on Geriatrics Assessment.

This ad hoc committee report from the American Geriatrics Society proposes the prompt initiation of Medicare reimbursement for geriatric assessment (GA) services (also termed comprehensive geriatric assessment or geriatric evaluation and management services). Despite an extensive body of literature documenting the effectiveness of GA for improving health care outcomes in many settings for identifiable groups of frail elderly patients, no explicit Medicare reimbursement mechanisms currently exist to cover GA services provided by either hospital or physician. We believe that new physician reimbursement codes specific for geriatric assessment should be established in the Current Procedural Technology (CPT-4) manual and that reimbursement for GA should be specifically provided under Part B of Medicare. Further, we believe that hospital reimbursement within the Medicare prospective payment system should be modified to encourage GA during inpatient stays for appropriate patients. This paper summarizes the background for these recommendations. It defines the major content of GA at three levels of intensity--screening, intermediate, and comprehensive. It describes the major sites for conducting GA--hospital, office, home, nursing home. Finally, it proposes criteria for targeting patients most likely to benefit from GA.

Aged

Geriatric assessment teams.

In geriatric care, a form of teamwork is the recommended modality because of the complex biopsychosocial needs of the patient. The goal of geriatric assessment programs is to establish an intensive assessment of older adults which requires the competencies of several coordinated disciplines. Not only do teams have the capacity to assess patients in much greater depth but also patients share different information with different providers. The composition of the team is dictated by the needs of the patient population in accordance with resources available. Next, one must identify a method of team practice in order for interactions to take place. The method of functioning determines what kind of team it is, ranging from independent functioning with minimal formal interfacing to interdependent activity interspersed with formal and informal interactions. In initiating a geriatric assessment program, one needs to determine which tasks demand interdisciplinary collaboration, which require interdisciplinary consultation, and which can be performed using a matrix or extended team model. In this model, the core team is supplemented by other disciplines as determined by the team, predicated on patient problems. Teams can profit from training, which can help with choosing an appropriate model, establishing a manual of procedure, and managing interactive issues and problems. This can occur early in the team's formation, or when a team takes on new members. The minimal level of team development would include establishing program goals, delineating professional responsibilities and roles, and implementing a system for exchanging and documenting information about patient plans. Saving input to share only in team meeting is inefficient, so health care teams need to recognize the importance of informal interchanges. It is still a matter of conjecture about what team works best with which patients under what circumstances or conditions. Multiple randomized clinical trials with teams will give us more information in this regard. In the meantime, organizers of geriatric assessment programs will have to make decisions based on clinical practice in the team development field and extrapolations from related health care team studies.

Aged

The emergence of geriatric assessment units. The "new technology of geriatrics".

Previous studies have suggested that geriatric assessment units may provide important benefits to the care of elderly persons. In early 1985 we surveyed personnel at 104 (91%) of the existing 114 geriatric assessment units associated with medical schools and Veterans Administration medical centers for information on the units' development and operation. Although almost 80% of the units were hospital based, most (61%) provided care for outpatients. Nearly half (47%) began operation in 1983 or later; of those in existence before 1983, two thirds have increased their capacity since then. The types of personnel and their training differed substantially among units. Fifty percent of the physicians had had no formal training in geriatrics. Of the 104 units, 99 (95%) did routine assessment. The estimated time spent per new patient in outpatient units was 2.7 +/- 2.1 (SD) hours. These data suggest that geriatric assessment units are proliferating rapidly, have differing structures, and consume substantial resources. Further efforts are needed to define their optimal structure, targets, and function.

Geriatrics

Comprehensive geriatric assessment: toward understanding its efficacy.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) offers health care professionals a technique for multidimensional diagnosis of frail elderly people to plan medical, psychosocial, and rehabilitative care. In the present paper, we provide a brief history of geriatric assessment, a description of the varied organization of geriatric assessment programs (GAPs), and a review of published effectiveness studies of programs worldwide performing comprehensive geriatric assessment. Program diversity has complicated drawing conclusions about the efficacy of CGA from a literature reporting generally positive, but not uniformly significant, results. We suggest that sample size limitations explain much of the variability in findings. Using the techniques of meta-analysis, we evaluate the effect of GAPs on mortality when all controlled trials are considered cumulatively. Meta-analysis of six-month mortality demonstrates a statistically significant 36% reduction of mortality for inpatient CGA programs (odds ratio = 0.64; 95% confidence interval = 0.50 to 0.83), and a 32% mortality reduction for all CGA programs (odds ratio = 0.68; 95% confidence interval = 0.57 to 0.80). Further use of meta-analytic techniques can be employed to clarify the effect of GAPs on other important outcomes (e.g., reduced hospital and nursing home use, improved functional status), and to identify program characteristics best promoting these benefits.

Aged

A prospective evaluation of the Geriatric Depression Scale in an outpatient geriatric assessment center.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) in cognitively intact and impaired patients undergoing outpatient geriatric assessment. SUBJECTS: One hundred ninety-four geriatric patients evaluated in a 1-year period. SETTING: The outpatient Geriatric Assessment Center of the University of Nebraska Medical Center. MEASUREMENTS: The 30-item GDS was completed by all patients. The patients were then evaluated by one of three geriatric psychiatrists who were blind to the GDS results. The prospective clinical diagnosis of major depression was compared to the GDS results. Patients were categorized as cognitively impaired or intact on the basis of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Data were analyzed using ROC curves. An optimal cutoff was identified which was the total score on the GDS with the highest combined sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: ROC curve analyses showed good agreement between the clinical diagnosis and the GDS in both cognitively intact and impaired subjects. Cognitively intact, euthymic patients reported a mean of 8.4 symptoms, while cognitively impaired, euthymic patients, reported a mean of 8.7. Cognitively intact, depressed patients reported a mean of 14.7 symptoms, while cognitively impaired, depressed patients reported a mean of 15.0. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides further evidence that the GDS is as accurate a screening test for depression in cognitively impaired as in intact patients.

Aged

An acute inpatient geriatric assessment and treatment unit.

The inpatient geriatric assessment unit (GAU) is an important component of the Geriatric Assessment and Treatment Centre (GATC) at the Royal Jubilee Hospital in Victoria, British Columbia. The Centre attempts to accomplish the following: to provide, at the request of the attending physician, diagnostic, treatment, and management services where it best suits the patient (ie, at home, in the outpatient service, or following admission to the ward); and to provide, if necessary, follow-up service after discharge to help prevent readmission to the acute hospital or any part of the geriatric service.

Aged

Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment techniques by community physicians.

BACKGROUND: Research has shown that comprehensive assessment techniques have several clinical benefits for geriatric patients. The purpose of this study was to determine how frequently community practitioners used comprehensive geriatric assessment techniques to identify factors related to use of those techniques. METHODS: The study group included 54% of the 100 community-based family physician preceptors who participate in the University of Mississippi's family medicine training programs. On-site interviews were conducted in each physician's office to measure the percentage of physicians who performed comprehensive geriatric assessment. RESULTS: The majority of physicians employed some selected age-related assessment techniques, but less than 25% performed functional assessment techniques considered unique to the geriatric patient, such as mental status assessment and evaluation of activities of daily living. Most physicians' personal and practice characteristics were unrelated to the use of assessment techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Although many physicians use some techniques of geriatric assessment, most practicing physicians do not perform comprehensive assessment of geriatric patients.

Adult

Consultative geriatric assessment for ambulatory patients. A randomized trial in a health maintenance organization.

Previous studies have shown that comprehensive geriatric assessment and follow-up can improve the health of hospitalized elderly patients. To evaluate the effectiveness of consultative geriatric assessment and limited follow-up for ambulatory patients, we randomized 600 elderly patients who were enrolled in a health maintenance organization into three groups: (1) consultation by a geriatric assessment team, (2) consultation by a "second opinion" internist, and (3) only traditional health maintenance organization services (control patients). The geriatric assessment team identified previously unrecognized problems in 35% of patients and advised changes in medication regimens for more than 40%. Nevertheless, patients who received assessment achieved only a small benefit in cognitive function after 3 months, which was not sustained for 1 year. There was no difference among groups in other measures of health status. Consultative geriatric assessment with limited follow-up did not benefit most older ambulatory patients in a health maintenance organization; if such care can be used effectively for ambulatory patients, it will require either additional targeting or continuing care or both.

Aged

Outpatient geriatric assessment: associations between referral sources and assessment findings.

A review of 431 outpatient geriatric assessments conducted over 2 years examined the associations of referral problems, assessment diagnoses, and therapeutic recommendations with the source of patient referral, as well as that referral source's diagnostic accuracy in identifying the referral problems. Families referred 52% of patients, primarily for problems of memory and behavior, whereas social service agencies made 32.9% of all referrals, primarily for bladder control problems or safety-related concerns. Physicians made only 6% of referrals in this setting. Referral source was found not to be associated with any of the seven categories of medical diagnoses resulting from the assessment process and was associated with only two of the functional diagnostic categories. Therapeutic recommendations were also broadly distributed among referral sources, though social service agencies did refer more patients who required urgent nursing home placement, financial representation, or adult protective service involvement. The performance of family referral sources in accurately referring patients with dementia and psychiatric impairment was comparable to that of physicians, though all referral sources frequently missed patients with incontinence. Non-physician referral sources appear to serve as important and quite valid case-finders for outpatient geriatric assessment.

Aged

The Senior Care Study. Does inpatient interdisciplinary geriatric assessment help the family caregivers of acutely ill older patients?

Comprehensive geriatric assessment has emerged as an effective strategy for improving outcomes for frail older patients in the hospital setting. Attention, however, has not been given to determining whether this process has any effect on their family caregivers. As part of a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to test the efficacy of early interdisciplinary geriatric assessment for acutely ill hospitalized patients 75 years of age or older, their family caregivers were studied to determine if the process had a positive effect on caregivers' self-reported health and emotional well-being. One hundred forty-two caregivers were approximately evenly distributed between experimentals (n = 69) and controls (n = 73). By three months after the patients' hospitalization, experimental caregivers were more likely to report good general health (81% vs 63%, P = .049) than were controls. The positive effect persisted after statistical adjustment for confounding variables. Experimental caregivers were not significantly more likely to have good emotional health at follow-up than were controls (65% vs 58%, P = .43), even after statistical adjustment. Although the findings are modest, they suggest that the acute hospital setting may be an ideal place to develop interventions designed to enhance family caregivers' well-being during the early months following hospitalization. This may be particularly true when the interventions with caregivers are coupled with a geriatric assessment and care plan process.

Aged

A randomized, controlled trial of a geriatric assessment unit in a community rehabilitation hospital.

We conducted a randomized trial in a community rehabilitation hospital to determine the effect of treatment in a geriatric assessment unit on the physical function, institutionalization rate, and mortality of elderly patients. Functionally impaired elderly patients (mean age, 78.8 years) who were recovering from acute medical or surgical illnesses and were considered at risk for nursing home placement were randomly assigned either to the geriatric assessment unit (n = 78) or to a control group that received usual care (n = 77). The two groups were similar at entry and were stratified according to the perceived risk of an immediate nursing home placement. After six months, the patients treated in the geriatric assessment unit had significantly more functional improvement in three of eight basic self-care activities (P less than 0.05). Those in the lower-risk stratum had significantly more improvement in seven of eight self-care activities. Both six weeks and six months after randomization, significantly more patients treated in the geriatric assessment unit than controls (79 vs. 61 percent after six months) were residing in the community. During the year of follow-up, the control patients had more nursing home stays of six months or longer (10 vs. 3; P less than 0.05). However, there was no difference between the groups in the mean number of days spent in health care facilities (acute care hospital, nursing home, or rehabilitation hospital). Survival analysis showed a trend toward fewer deaths among the patients treated in the geriatric assessment unit, and mortality was significantly reduced in the patients considered to be at lower risk of immediate nursing home placement (P less than 0.05). We conclude that the treatment of selected elderly patients in a specialized geriatric rehabilitation unit improves function, decreases the risk of nursing home placement, and may reduce mortality. The beneficial effects on mortality and function appear greatest for patients at a moderate rather than high risk of nursing home placement.

Follow-Up Studies

Geriatric assessment programs in the United States. Their growing role and impact.

Geriatric assessment programs have become a growing component of the health care delivery system for the elderly in the United States. They generally provide interdisciplinary assessment, treatment planning, case management, and often rehabilitation for frail elderly persons and are especially important for persons suspected of needing long-term institutional care. Their development here stems from long experience with geriatric assessment in the United Kingdom and increasing evidence of their effectiveness in North American settings. Among their demonstrated benefits are better diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning, more appropriate placement decisions with less referral to nursing homes, and improved patient functional status, general well-being, and survival. This article provides, in addition to an overview of geriatric assessment programs and their effectiveness, practical guidelines for their establishment in the hospital setting.

Aged

The Senior Care Study. A controlled trial of a consultative/unit-based geriatric assessment program in acute care.

Successful models of inpatient geriatric assessment have often involved long hospital stays, specialized interdisciplinary care, and prolonged follow-up, which are difficult to achieve within a prospective payment system. A randomized clinical trial was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy (maintenance or improvement in mental, emotional, and physical function) of using a geriatric assessment process in acute hospital care without increasing hospital charges or lengths of stay. Four hundred thirty-six patients greater than or equal to 75 years of age were randomly allocated to treatment (n = 221) or control (n = 215) conditions. Patients in the treatment group were admitted to a special unit and evaluated on admission by an interdisciplinary team, which developed a care plan. Although primary care was provided by the patient's own physician, the team followed the patients as consultants on the unit in the hospital, and by telephone for 2 months after discharge. The control group was placed on other units and received usual hospital care. The treatment and control groups were similar at study entry. At follow-up, there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to lengths of stay, hospital charges, mortality, change in physical function, or change in mental function. The treatment group changed more often in measured emotional function (chi 2 = 6.213, P = .045). This study indicates that it is feasible to implement consultative interdisciplinary team care in the acute-care hospital, but that its efficacy may be limited when applied to an unselected group of older patients.

Activities of Daily Living

Geriatric assessment: an overview of its impacts.

Geriatric assessment programs of various types have become an increasingly important component of the geriatric health care delivery system in the United States. Such programs provide interdisciplinary assessment, treatment planning, case management, and, often, rehabilitation for frail elderly persons and are especially important for those suspected of needing long-term institutional care. A growing body of literature, summarized in this chapter, documents many proven benefits to health care outcomes. Among these benefits are better diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning, more appropriate placement decisions with less referral to nursing homes, improved patient functional and mental status, prolonged patient survival, and lower overall use of costly institutional care services.

Aged

Cognitive function testing in comprehensive geriatric assessment. A comparison of cognitive test performance in residential and clinic settings.

Tests of cognitive function are frequently used in geriatric assessment, but the effect of test setting has rarely been explored. To determine the effect of testing site on the performance of elderly patients undergoing a comprehensive geriatric assessment, we administered the Mini-Mental State Exam to 116 geriatric patients in the clinic and at their residence. Their cognitive abilities varied from normal to severely impaired. The patients' scores were 1.5 +/- 3.6 (mean +/- SD) higher at their residence. The clinical importance of a difference in score of 1.5 is not clear. For this reason a second analysis was performed in which a difference in scores of five points or greater between settings was considered clinically meaningful. Twenty-five percent (29 of 116) differed by five points or more. Of these 29 patients, 22 (76%) tested better in the residential setting. These differences were statistically significant (P = .001). We conclude that the testing site may affect test performance and that in-home assessment may reveal the optimal cognitive function of geriatric patients.

Aged

Caregiver burden should be evaluated during geriatric assessment.

This study examines the relationship between caregiver burden and use of long-term care services following geriatric assessment. One hundred nine older subjects underwent comprehensive assessment, which included a questionnaire completed by the primary caregiver to assess the sense of burden in providing care. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of service use at 12 months. Among measures of the older person's cognitive and physical abilities, only activities of daily living predicted increased use of services. When the measure of caregiver burden was added, it also entered as an independent predictor, which significantly improved the prediction of service use (chi 2 = 5.9, P less than .02). In a separate analysis, caregiver burden predicted both the use of home services and nursing-home placement. During longitudinal follow-up, the measure of burden decreased over 12 months for the sample, with the greatest reduction in burden occurring for caregivers whose relative was placed in a nursing home. The fact that caregiver burden was the most important factor in determining who would use formal services suggests that burden should be evaluated as part of geriatric assessment.

Activities of Daily Living

Monitoring regional geriatric assessment teams: analysis of client flows and outcomes.

The Commonwealth Government funding of the Geriatric Assessment Program began in 1984. The Program included an evaluation component, and this paper reports findings for three Regional Geriatric Assessment Teams (RGATs) in Victoria focusing on (1) the identification of different starting points in the flow of clients to the RGATs, (2) the relationships between different starting points and (3) recommended care plans, and the relationships between (2) and final outcome, particularly whether or not this involved admission to nursing home care. The role performed by RGATs is reviewed in the context of introducing mandatory assessment, the success of which will depend on the effectiveness of RGATs not only in differentiating need for and securing admission to nursing home care but also in assessing for, accessing and initiating alternative services.

Aged