PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Gestodene--side effects”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Multicenter trial of two monophasic oral contraceptives containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol and either desogestrel or gestodene in Thai women.

The efficacy and acceptability of two third generation oral contraceptives in Thai women were evaluated in a prospective, open, group-comparative, randomized, multicenter trial of women asking for contraception. In six Family Planning Centers and Outpatient Gynaecological Clinics in urban areas in Thailand, 783 healthy women who were at risk for pregnancy and did not have contraindications to oral contraceptive use were randomly allocated to one of the two study groups. An oral contraceptive containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol and 150 mcg desogestrel was given to 394 women and an oral contraceptive with the same amount of ethinylestradiol and 75 mcg gestodene to 389 women during 6 cycles. Criteria of cycle control, side effects and the presence and severity of acne vulgaris were assessed and blood pressure and body weight measured at pretreatment and after cycles 1, 3 and 6. Furthermore, the efficacy was evaluated after the last cycle. No pregnancies occurred with either of the contraceptives. The incidences of irregular bleeding and minor side effects in both groups were very low and decreased after an initial increase in the first cycle. Acne improved in both groups. Blood pressure and body weight remained unchanged. The two oral contraceptives were found to be effective and acceptable in Thai women. Compared to Caucasian women, the incidences of irregular bleeding and side effects were apparently lower in these Asian women. Furthermore, the effects of both oral contraceptives were comparable.

Adult↗

An open prospective study on the effects on carbohydrate metabolism of an oral monophasic contraceptive containing gestodene (WL-70).

The effects of a monophasic oral contraceptive (gestodene 75mcg + ethinylestradiol 30 mcg) on plasma glucose (PG) and insulin (IRI) responses to an oral glucose load (OGTT) and on glycosylated haemoglobin Alc (HbAlc), fructosamine (Fr), total cortisol (FT) and transcortin (CBG) were studied in 30 healthy women. Blood samples were taken before treatment and after 6 and 12 cycles. After 6 and 12 months, OGTT-PG and IRI levels showed substantially unchanged values; for HbAlc and Fr the same behaviour was seen with the exception of the latter between 6 and 12 months; FT and CBG showed significant rises. All recorded values were in the normal range. The basal and dynamic PG and IRI behaviour failed to show any significant variations between pre-treatment values and those after 6 and 12 months of OC administration. Other data showed a substantial neutrality for this oral contraceptive containing gestodene.

Adolescent↗

Six-month carbohydrate metabolism studies in women using oral contraceptives containing gestodene and ethinyl estradiol.

Twenty-five women had their carbohydrate metabolism prospectively evaluated during the six months that they used a gestodene and ethinyl estradiol monophasic oral contraceptive. Serum glucose and insulin levels were measured during a 75-gram three-hour oral glucose tolerance test. At the six-month test, the three-hour glucose and the fasting and three-hour insulin values were significantly elevated. The literature on carbohydrate metabolism during gestodene oral contraceptive use is also reviewed.

Adult↗

Open prospective multicenter trial with a new monophasic contraceptive combination containing gestodene.

In a large and open prospective multicenter trial of 12,250 cycles from 2,378 women, contraceptive efficacy, clinical tolerance and acceptability of a new monophasic contraceptive combination containing 75 mcg gestodene (delta-5-levonorgestrel) and 30 mcg ethinyl oestradiol were studied. The objective was to assess efficacy, safety, side effects and cycle control of this oral contraceptive on healthy women using no other additional birth control methods. Two women became pregnant (0.016%) during the trial; both were patient failures. There was no effect on systolic or diastolic pressures. An average weight increase of 0.3 kg was noted. Cycle control was excellent with 95% of the cycles free of spotting and 98% free of breakthrough bleeding after six cycles. No serious complications occurred. There was an overall incidence of 14% reported side effects (after six cycles), indicating that the hormonal combination is well tolerated. It should be noted that 41.4% of the patients had some complaint before starting the treatment. For all complaints, a highly significant improvement was seen during the treatment.

Adolescent↗

Ultrasound evaluation of ovarian activity under oral contraceptives.

The trend towards changing the composition of the contraceptive pill in order to decrease side effects might lead to increased ovarian activity. This may decrease reliability. Therefore, a non-invasive method for monitoring the suppressive effect of the pill on ovarian function is warranted. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether or not diagnostic ultrasound might be the method of choice for studying residual ovarian activity during pill use. In 89 women on a low-dose oral contraceptive (30 mcg ethinyl-estradiol (EE)/75 mcg gestodene), the first two months of pill-intake were monitored extensively with diagnostic ultrasound. The study revealed that only one ultrasound investigation was needed during the first week of pill intake to discover all relevant cases of residual ovarian activity. Follow-up investigations are needed to quantify this activity more specifically.

Contraceptives, Oral↗

[Clinical effectiveness of Marvelon].

Clinical results of a new contraceptive pills--Marvelon (Organon) were studied. 32 women, ages 30 +/- 5 years, participated in the study during at least 6 cycles. Marvelon was good tolerated and subjective side-effects were very low. The cycles were regular, duration of withdrawal bleeding was 3-5 days and the amount of the blood lost were unchanged or milder. Marvelon didn't affect body weight and blood pressure. Favourable lipid profile--increased a mean level of HDL-Cholesterol and decreased a mean level of LDL-Cholesterol were noticed. Pearl Index was 0,0.

Adult↗

The influence of thrombotic risk factors when oral contraceptives are prescribed. A control-only study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess preferential prescribing of OC according to different thrombotic risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The control group in an ongoing Danish case-control study on stroke and OCs collected in 1994 and 1995 underwent a control-only analysis concerning the occurrence of thrombotic risk factors among users of different types of OC. Specific attention was given to differences between OCs with second and third generation progestagens. The association between specific risk factors and the pill types was assessed crude and after multivariate analysis with confounder control for age and other risk factors, in order to identify risk factors, which after these corrections still had a significant confounding influence on the prescribing of OC. RESULTS: Users of OCs with third generation progestagens had a significantly higher proportion of familial thrombotic disposition (23.1%) than users of OCs with second generation progestagens (7.1%) (p = 0.01). After correction for age and other risk factors this difference was still highly significant (p = 0.002). Among users of third generation pills the proportion of short time users (< 1 year) (22.4%) was significantly higher than the per cent among users of OCs with second generation progestagens (5.5%) (p < 0.001). This difference was still significant after correction for age and other risk factors (p < 0.001). Smoking, years of schooling, migraine, and body mass index did not differ significantly between the two pill groups. CONCLUSION: In Denmark, women with familial thrombotic disposition are four times more likely being prescribed OCs with third versus second generation progestagens compared with women without such a disposition. At the same time users of OCs with third generation progestagens include significantly more short time users than users of OCs with second generation progestagens. For thrombotic diseases where familial disposition or duration of use of OCs play a role for the pill-associated risk, these differences may significantly influence the thrombotic risk measures in case-control studies and non-randomized cohort studies unless confounder control is conducted for this selection.

Adolescent↗

Comparison of two triphasic oral contraceptives containing either gestodene or norethindrone: a randomized, controlled trial.

Two triphasic oral contraceptives containing either gestodene or norethindrone as the progestogenic compound combined with ethinyl estradiol were compared in a randomized clinical trial to assess their contraceptive reliability, clinical tolerance and cycle control. Both preparations were effective in preventing pregnancy. The gestodene preparation proved significantly superior regarding cycle control and general tolerance.

Acne Vulgaris↗

Gestodene-containing contraceptives.

As GSD is the most potent progestogen used in oral contraceptives, the doses of GSD can be lower than those of other progestogen components. The monophasic (30 micrograms EE + 75 micrograms GSD) and the triphasic formulation (30 micrograms EE + 50 micrograms GSD/40 micrograms EE + 70 micrograms GSD/30 micrograms EE + 100 micrograms GSD) suppress gonadotropin release and ovarian function profoundly and inhibit ovulation reliably. The strong anti-estrogenic and progestogenic effectiveness of GSD is based on the high GSD serum concentrations achieved during daily intake. Because of the weak androgenic properties of GSD, both formulations can be characterized as estrogen-dominant with respect to their hepatic effects. Except for the first cycles, both formulations afford good cycle control, and the rate of side effects is similar to that with comparable low-dose oral contraceptives. The levels of total and free androgens and androgen precursors, as well as of peripheral androgen activity, are significantly reduced, resulting in a reduced incidence of acne. The concentrations of SHBG and other serum-binding globulins are elevated considerably, and thyroid function is almost unaffected. The estrogen-dominant effect on hepatic metabolism of both formulations also is reflected by a significant increase in the levels of triglycerides and VLDL, HDL, and some apolipoproteins, while LDL-CH and total CH remain unchanged. Similar to other low-dose oral contraceptives, the GSD-containing preparations cause a slight impairment of glucose tolerance that does not appear to be of clinical relevance. However, a significant increase exists in pro-coagulatory and fibrinolytic activity that leads to a considerable stimulation of fibrin turnover. In predisposed women, this may contribute to an elevated risk of venous and arterial thromboembolic diseases.

Carbohydrate Metabolism↗