PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “HERNIA”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Outcome of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in correlation with obesity, type of hernia, and hernia size.

BACKGROUND: The morbidity and overall recovery time of ventral hernia repair can vary significantly depending on the hernia type or size and on other factors, such as the body mass index (BMI). The purpose of our study was to investigate the effects of type of hernia, hernia size, and BMI on the outcome of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. METHODS: Fifty patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair were retrospectively reviewed and stratified according to hernia type (incisional, IVH/primary, PVH), hernia size, and BMI. These subgroups were compared in regard to operative time, resumption of diet, hospital stay, pain control, and complication rate. RESULTS: Laparoscopic IVH repair was associated with a longer operative time (143 vs. 98 minutes, p = .02) and length of stay (2.2 vs. 0.6 days, p = .03) than PVH repair. The narcotic requirements were higher in the IVH group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Larger hernias were associated with a longer operative time (p = .04) and increased narcotic requirement (p = .03). The morbidity of the laparoscopic repair was not significantly affected by the hernia type or size. The BMI did not significantly alter any of the parameters examined. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repair of incisional and larger hernias is a technically demanding procedure that requires a longer operative time. In contrast to PVH repair, laparoscopic IVH repair usually cannot be performed on an outpatient basis. Surgeons need not be discouraged from recommending the laparoscopic approach for patients with large IVHs or with severe obesity because the morbidity remains low.

Body Mass Index↗
PubMed1991

Association of hiatus hernia with postero-lateral diaphragmatic hernia (Bochdalek's hernia).

A boy with hiatus hernia following the repair of the left postero-lateral diaphragmatic hernia (Bochdalek's hernia) was reported. At the age of one month, the repair of Bochdalek hernia was performed with transabdominal approach. At that time the stomach was located in the normal position. Eight days after the repair he developed vomiting and hiatus hernia was revealed by barium esophagram. Antireflux surgery was required because there was no response to the conservative management for two months. Esophageal pH study and manometric study were very useful for the diagnosis of hiatus hernia or GER and the evaluation of antireflux surgery.

Abnormalities, Multiple↗
PubMed2002

A massive hiatal hernia that mimics a congenital diaphragmatic hernia. An unusual presentation of hiatal hernia in childhood: report of a case.

A massive hiatal hernia containing the colon, intestine, and stomach with organoaxial volvulus is an uncommon entity in childhood. This clinical form of a hiatal hernia may mimic congenital diaphragmatic hernia and chest pathologies. In this paper, we describe a patient who presented with a massive hiatal hernia that mimicked a congenital diaphragmatic hernia, and discuss the pitfalls in diagnosing this clinical entity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

When a hernia is not a hernia: the evaluation of inguinal hernias in the cirrhotic patient.

Herniorrhapy in patients with advanced portal hypertension and ascites should be approached with caution, and treated conservatively whenever possible. Cirrhosis increases the risk of significant perioperative complications such as infection, recurrence, and ascites leak. This paper reports two patients operated on for suspected inguinal hernias. The first patient was referred for elective repair of a presumed inguinal hernia before liver transplantation. The second patient presented with a history of an incarcerated inguinal hernia that was previously reduced in the emergency center. After examination by residents and senior faculty the patients were scheduled for elective herniorrhaphy. Intraoperatively no inguinal hernia could be identified in either patient. However, massively dilated veins (1.5-2.0 cm in diameter) were noted entering with the spermatic cord at the internal inguinal ring. In both cases the veins were clamped, transected, and suture ligated at the internal ring. Given the unusual presentation of these dilated veins in both patients we advocate the use of preoperative Doppler ultrasound in patients with cirrhosis and suspected inguinal hernias.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

"Suture hernia": identification of a new type of hernia presenting as a recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

After laparoscopic repair of ventral or incisional hernias, the recurrence rates reported are around 4%. Different mechanisms for the recurrences have been identified. We report two cases in which the patients were operated on laparoscopically for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. In both cases, the site of the recurrent hernia was situated at the transfascial fixation sutures. Patients were treated by laparoscopy with a larger intraperitoneal mesh covering the new hernia and the old mesh.

Aged, 80 and over↗
PubMed2001

Use of the prolene hernia system for inguinal hernia repair: retrospective, comparative time analysis versus other inguinal hernia repair systems.

No data are available for the duration of surgery for the various procedures currently used in hernia repair. This retrospective study was undertaken to determine the time required for the surgical repair of unilateral primary inguinal hernias using currently available procedures and to show specifically that the duration of surgery using the PROLENE Hernia System (PHS) was equal to or less than the duration of surgery using a plug-and-patch device. Data were collected from 1032 sequential hernia procedures performed by 16 surgeons at a community hospital between 1997 and 1999. To gain more accurate information to compare the PHS and plug-and-patch procedures data from four surgeons who had performed at least five of each procedure were used as the primary analysis database. The two most frequently used devices were the PHS (35.9%) and plug and patch (41.0%). The average times of surgery for these procedures were not significantly different (25.4 vs 27.2 minutes, respectively; P = 0.236). A significant variability was observed between surgeons in the duration of surgery and there was evidence for an inverse relationship between the duration of surgery and the number of procedures a surgeon had performed. Both procedures take approximately the same time to perform.

Female↗
PubMed1997

[Abdominal wall hernias (inguinal hernia, incisional hernia)].

Within the range of treatment of inguinal hernias, the paper concentrates on the following procedures: Shouldice, the "tension-free" repairs of Lichtenstein, Rutkow, TIPP, and the laparoscopic procedures TAPP and TEP. An individual, selective approach tailored to the type of hernia, as well as the age and profession of the patient is recommended. A multicenter study comparing these procedures would be useful. Conventional repair of incisional hernias (simple closure, Mayo) has a depressing recurrence rate of 30%-40%. Better results are obtained by using a synthetic prosthesis, which can be implanted using the sublay inlay, or onlay technique.

Cicatrix↗
PubMed2005

Inguinal Hernia: classification, diagnosis and treatment--classic, traumatic and Sportsman's hernia.

Inguinal hernia repair is performed in more than 600,000 cases every year in the United States. However, the true prevalence may be even higher. Many groin hernias are not diagnosed, e.g., Sportmans' hernia, or are asymptomatic. The etiology of classic inguinal hernia, Sportsman's hernia or traumatic hernia may be different. The hernia repair is performed in agreement with a classification of the hernia, e.g., Nyhus classification. According to recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses open-mesh repair demonstrates several advantages in comparison to laparoscopic procedures. Laparoscopic procedures require more time and cost more, show a potential for serious complications and may be followed by an increased rate of recurrence. There may be a faster reconvalescence after laparoscopic procedures. However, there may be also a selection bias. Laparoscopic procedures are associated with specific complications, e.g., pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax, gas extravasation, trocar injuries, intraabdominal adhesions, bowel obstruction, which are rarely or never seen in open-mesh repair. In the United States we could observe an uncoupling of hernia repair from classification. In more than 90% of cases the treatment was open-mesh. In many hernia studies the hernias were classified as direct or indirect, primary or recurrent. The existing classifications are based on anatomical findings in relation to the development of the hernia: posterior floor integrity, enlarged interior ring and size of the hernia. However, the size of the hernia may not always be associated with the severity of the hernia and it may be difficult to estimate. The outcome of hernia repair may be influenced by other factors. There may be differences in the presentation of the hernia to the surgeon based on the damage done to the surrounding tissue in the inguinal canal, e.g., external ring, aponeurosis of the external oblique, inguinal ligament, which is most often accompanied by severe adhesions. Further factors influencing outcome of hernia repair may be patient-related factors, e.g., constipation, ASA classification, diabetes, smoking. A classification should be simple to use and easy to remember: (A) indirect hernia, (B) direct hernia, (C) scrotal or giant hernia, (D) femoral hernia. A and B can be classified as (0) uncomplicated, (1) posterior floor defect, (2) posterior floor defect plus defect in the anterior part of the inguinal canal. All four types (A-D) may be either primary or recurrent. In this classification combined femoral, indirect and/or direct hernias can be categorized by using the types A, B, C, or D as in a modular construction system. The category "other" is reserved for rare types of hernia, e.g., obturator hernia, Spieghelian hernia. Aggravating factors are included: Diabetes, obesity, age above 65, constipation, ASA III or more and cigarette smoking. This classification may be helpful to evaluate outcome of hernia repair with regard to patient related factors and the increased demands for the surgeon and the staff. In some health care systems the general belief is that all hernias are equal and be managed equally. However, groin hernias may be complex and need individual treatment.

Athletic Injuries↗
PubMed2006

Occult hernias and bilateral endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: is there a need for prophylactic repair? : Results of endoscopic extraperitoneal repair over a period of 10 years.

BACKGROUND: An advantage of the endoscopic total extraperitoneal approach over the conventional hernia repair is detection of an unsuspected, asymptomatic hernia on the contralateral side. A high incidence of occult contralateral hernias has been reported in the literature. However, few studies have examined the incidence of development of a hernia on the healthy side evaluated previously during an endoscopic unilateral hernia repair. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of development of a contralateral hernia after a previous bilateral exploration. The need for a prophylactic contralateral repair is also addressed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of 822 endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repairs done in 634 patients over a period of 10 years from May 1993 to 2003. Incidence of hernia undetected clinically and during previous contralateral repair was assessed over a follow up period ranging from 10 to 82 months. RESULTS: About 7.97% of bilateral hernias were clinically occult hernias. Only 1.12% of unilateral hernia repairs (who had undergone a contralateral evaluation at surgery) subsequently developed a hernia on the other side. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic approach to inguinal hernia repair is an excellent tool to detect and treat occult contralateral hernias. The incidence of hernia occurring at the contralateral side after a previous bilateral exploration is low, hence a prophylactic repair on the contralateral side is not recommended on a routine basis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Association of hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux: correlation between presence and size of hiatal hernia and 24-hour pH monitoring of the esophagus.

OBJECTIVE: The relationship of hiatal hernia to gastroesophageal reflux disease remains controversial. Previous endoscopic and radiologic studies of hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis have shown that hiatal hernia is a poor predictor of the presence of endoscopic esophagitis, especially for smaller hernias. Similar correlations with 24-hr pH monitoring have not been done. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a correlation between the presence and size of hiatal hernias and gastroesophageal reflux using 24-hr pH monitoring as a measure of the degree of reflux. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the barium esophagograms and the results of pH monitoring of the esophagus in 319 patients (161 women and 158 men; mean age, 51 years). The presence and size of hiatal hernia were determined from the radiographic examination; size was categorized as "minimal" or "larger" (> or = 2 cm axial length). An abnormal result of pH monitoring was defined as a pH less than 4 for 6% or more of the 24-hr observation time. RESULTS: Abnormal results of pH monitoring were found in 61 (31%) of 199 patients with hiatal hernia compared with 21 (18%) of 120 patients without hiatal hernia (p < .05). Abnormal findings of pH monitoring were present in 33 (35%) of 95 patients with a larger hiatal hernia versus 28 (27%) of 104 patients with a minimal hiatal hernia (p > .05); a significant difference (p < .05) was observed when patients without hiatal hernia were compared with those with a larger hiatal hernia. CONCLUSION: Most patients in this study had normal results of pH monitoring of the esophagus regardless of the presence or absence of hiatal hernia. However, patients with larger hiatal hernias were more likely to have abnormal findings on pH monitoring; hiatal hernias of minimal size were a poorer predictor of the presence of abnormal gastroesophageal reflux.

Esophagus↗