PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “HMMR”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

miR-9-5p/HMMR regulates the tumorigenesis and progression of clear cell renal cell carcinoma through EMT and JAK1/STAT1 signaling pathway.

BACKGROUND: The most common malignant type of kidney cancer is clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The expression levels of hyaluronan-mediated motility receptor (HMMR) in many tumor types are significantly elevated. HMMR is closely associated with tumor-related progression, treatment resistance, and poor prognosis, and has yet to be fully investigated in terms of its expression patterns and molecular mechanisms of action in ccRCC. Further research is imperative to elucidate these aspects. METHODS: We used The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database to preliminarily investigate HMMR expression and function in ccRCC and the data for 19 samples from the NCBI GEO database (GSE207493) for single-cell analysis. We assessed the differential expression level of HMMR between ccRCC cancerous tissues and their matched non-tumor tissues. Subsequently, a series of in vivo and in vitro experiments were designed to elucidate the biological function of HMMR in ccRCC, including Transwell assays, CCK-8 assays, clone formation assays and subcutaneous xenograft experiments in nude mice. Through bioinformatics analysis, we identified potential microRNAs (miRNAs) that may regulate HMMR, as well as the possible signaling pathways involved. Finally, we conducted a series of cellular functional experiments to validate our hypotheses regarding the HMMR axis. RESULTS: HMMR expression was significantly up-regulated in tumor tissues of ccRCC patients, and elevated HMMR expression level showed a strong correlation with ccRCC progression and adverse prognoses of patients. Knocking down HMMR inhibited the proliferative and migratory abilities of ccRCC cells, while its overexpression amplified these oncogenic properties. In nude mice model, reduced HMMR expression inhibited ccRCC tumor proliferation in vivo. Furthermore, overexpression of an upstream transcriptional regulator, miR-9-5p, effectively downregulated HMMR expression and thus impeded ccRCC cells proliferation and migration. HMMR might influence ccRCC growth via the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) pathway and the Janus Kinase 1/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 1 (JAK1/STAT1) pathway. CONCLUSIONS: HMMR is overexpressed in ccRCC, and there is a significant link between high HMMR expression and tumor progression, as well as poor patient prognosis. Specifically, HMMR could be targeted and inhibited by miR-9-5p and might modulate the tumorigenesis and progression of ccRCC through both EMT and JAK1/STAT1 signaling pathway.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell

An oxidative stress - and immunotherapy-related six-gene signature defines immune subtypes and predicts prognosis and immunotherapy response in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress and the tumor immune microenvironment jointly shape hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progression and response to immunotherapy, yet integrated biomarkers linking these processes are lacking. METHODS: Transcriptomic and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets were used to identify oxidative stress- and immunotherapyrelated differentially expressed genes (OSIRDEGs). Functional enrichment, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and LASSO-Cox regression were used to construct a prognostic signature. Consensus clustering, TIDE, CIBERSORT and ssGSEA characterized immune phenotypes. Somatic mutation, copy-number and drug-response data were integrated to assess genomic alterations and drug sensitivity. Expression of model genes was validated by qRT-PCR and western blotting in HCC cell lines. RESULTS: We identified 24 OSIRDEGs enriched in cell-cycle and mitotic pathways. WGCNA intersection yielded 18 module genes, from which a six-gene signature (BUB1B, CDKN2A, CENPE, HMMR, PTTG1, SPP1) was derived. The signature robustly stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups with significantly different progression-free and disease-free survival in both TCGA-LIHC and GSE14520. Based on signature expression, two molecular subtypes were defined, exhibiting distinct survival, immune landscapes and predicted immunotherapy responsiveness. Model genes harbored recurrent alterations and showed significant correlations with anticancer agents. All six genes were upregulated at mRNA and protein levels in metastatic HCC cell lines versus normal hepatocytes. CONCLUSIONS: We systematically explored the landscape of OSIRDEGs in HCC, and proposed a validated six-gene signature that refines prognostic stratification, delineates immunerelevant HCC subtypes and highlights candidate biomarkers for therapeutic selection and mechanistic investigation.

Humans

Reanalysis of BRCA1/2 negative high risk ovarian cancer patients reveals novel germline risk loci and insights into missing heritability.

While up to 25% of ovarian cancer (OVCA) cases are thought to be due to inherited factors, the majority of genetic risk remains unexplained. To address this gap, we sought to identify previously undescribed OVCA risk variants through the whole exome sequencing (WES) and candidate gene analysis of 48 women with ovarian cancer and selected for high risk of genetic inheritance, yet negative for any known pathogenic variants in either BRCA1 or BRCA2. In silico SNP analysis was employed to identify suspect variants followed by validation using Sanger DNA sequencing. We identified five pathogenic variants in our sample, four of which are in two genes featured on current multi-gene panels; (RAD51D, ATM). In addition, we found a pathogenic FANCM variant (R1931*) which has been recently implicated in familial breast cancer risk. Numerous rare and predicted to be damaging variants of unknown significance were detected in genes on current commercial testing panels, most prominently in ATM (n = 6) and PALB2 (n = 5). The BRCA2 variant p.K3326*, resulting in a 93 amino acid truncation, was overrepresented in our sample (odds ratio = 4.95, p = 0.01) and coexisted in the germline of these women with other deleterious variants, suggesting a possible role as a modifier of genetic penetrance. Furthermore, we detected loss of function variants in non-panel genes involved in OVCA relevant pathways; DNA repair and cell cycle control, including CHEK1, TP53I3, REC8, HMMR, RAD52, RAD1, POLK, POLQ, and MCM4. In summary, our study implicates novel risk loci as well as highlights the clinical utility for retesting BRCA1/2 negative OVCA patients by genomic sequencing and analysis of genes in relevant pathways.

Adult

A model of cellular proliferation and mitochondrial biogenesis predicts prognosis and immunotherapy response in lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), which is the leading subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), poses considerable difficulties in accurate prognostic assessment and targeted therapeutic options. Cell proliferation-related genes (CPGs) and mitochondrial biogenesis-related genes (MBGs) play critical roles in tumor metabolic reprogramming; however, their prognostic value and molecular mechanisms in LUAD are poorly understood. This study aims to construct a CPG/MBG-based prognostic risk model for LUAD, evaluate its clinical utility in predicting prognosis and immunotherapy response, and experimentally validate the functional role of key model genes in LUAD progression. METHODS: By utilizing The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-LUAD and GSE72094 datasets, this investigation formulated a risk scoring model through differential expression screening combined with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression analysis. The molecular characteristics and clinical implications of the risk model were investigated via immune microenvironment evaluation, genomic alteration analysis, and drug sensitivity prediction. The functional contributions of key genes were further substantiated using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), commercial assay kits, the JC-1 fluorescent probe, the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), Transwell invasion assays, and wound healing assays. RESULTS: A risk model based on seven CPGs and MBGs (PLK1, HMMR, CYP27A1, LDHA, NPAS2, KRT17, CIDEC) showed reliable predictive performance in both GSE72094 and the TCGA-LUAD cohorts. Enhanced tumor heterogeneity and an immunosuppressive microenvironment were observed in the high-risk group. Drug sensitivity analysis indicated that the risk model could guide personalized treatment strategies; for instance, high-risk patients showed increased susceptibility to agents such as docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil. In vitro experiments demonstrated that the key gene CIDEC exhibited upregulated expression in LUAD tissues and cells. Knockdown of CIDEC led to enhanced cellular energy metabolism and increased mitochondrial membrane potential, while also effectively suppressing cell invasion, proliferation, and migration. CONCLUSIONS: The established MBGs/CPGs prognostic model provides a novel tool for stratified treatment planning in LUAD, underscoring the crucial roles of cellular proliferation and mitochondrial biogenesis in tumor progression. Functional validation of CIDEC offers experimental support for the development of potential therapeutic strategies.

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD)