PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Health Status Indicators”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

A comparison of three health status indicators.

Interest in health status indicators has produced measures of widely varying applicability. We were interested in the use of such indices to establish mean recovery curves for groups of similar patients undergoing acute hospital treatment. A longitudinal study relating resource usage to these recovery curves had been intended but there were difficulties in finding suitable indicators. Firstly, two published indicators relying on patient interviews were tested for consistency. Poor correlations were found among those scorers unfamiliar with the patients and it seems unlikely that these indicators could be used in a routine system. Different parts of the indices presented difficulties to the different professions involved in scoring, and a multidisciplinary approach may be needed in assessing full health. The indicators tested included no assessment of prognosis. Those parts of the indices which had produced significant correlations were retained in subsequent work and were supplemented by further measures designed to overcome the earlier difficulties. A new trial of this indicator was undertaken where staff, familiar with the patients, scored data recorded by the Problem Oriented Medical Record system. This produced improved correlations but some problems remain.

Disability Evaluation↗

Consensus set of health status indicators for the general assessment of community health status--United States.

Healthy People 2000 establishes a framework for the development of an explicit prevention program for the nation (1); the Year 2000 Health Objectives Planning Act* provides legislative support for such a program. To address both the requirements of that act and Objective 22.1 of Healthy People 2000, a consensus set of 18 health status indicators has been developed to assist communities in assessing their general health status and in focusing local, state, and national efforts in tracking the year 2000 objectives. Priority in selecting the indicators was given to measures for which data are readily available and that are commonly used in public health.

Aged↗

Demographic and health status indicators to guide health promotion for Hispanic and Anglo rural elderly.

Naturally occurring differences rather than simple breakdowns by ethnic category are being used to tailor strategies in a three year senior community health worker-delivered health promotion intervention. A survey conducted of persons 60 and over in a rural southwestern U.S. community identified New Anglos (recent settlers, n = 264), Old Anglos (long-time residents, n = 298) and Hispanics (n = 236) for a total of 798 persons. Significant demographic differences included less education, poorer health status and more chronic conditions among Hispanics. Low rates of screening were the norm but especially severe among Old Anglos. Patterned differences in health practices, as well as group variations in use of resources and sources of information, revealed New Anglos used a larger variety of services and media. Generally, adjustments being made are related to Hispanic culture, cosmopolitan orientation of the New Anglos, and long-term isolation from information and services for Old Anglos.

Aged↗

CDC's consensus set of health status indicators: monitoring and prioritization by state health departments.

A survey assessed the extent to which state health departments monitor and prioritize the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's consensus set of health status indicators. A response rate of 100% was obtained. Although mortality indicators are often monitored, only 75.5% of the states monitor work-related injury deaths. Most states monitor the incidence of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, measles, tuberculosis, and syphilis. Low birthweight, births to adolescents, and lack of prenatal care are monitored in nearly all states and are considered high-priority problems. Only 46.9% of states are monitoring poor air quality, and only 58.8% are monitoring childhood poverty. Survey results suggest a need for standardized assessment of indicators for policy development and program planning.

Adolescent↗

Trends in racial and ethnic-specific rates for the health status indicators: United States, 1990-98.

The Health Status Indicators (HSIs) were developed as part of the Healthy People 2000 process to facilitate the comparison of health status measures at national, State,and local levels. In this report national trends in racial and ethnic-specific rates for 17 HSIs are examined for the period from 1990-8. One of three overarching goals of Healthy People 2000 was to reduce health disparities. Examination of trends in the HSIs indicates that rates for most racial/ethnic groups improved. Rates for American Indian or Alaska Natives did not improve for six of the HSIs. An index of disparity, a summary measure of disparity among race/ethnic-specific rates, was used to measure changes in disparity between 1990 and 1998. The index of disparity decreased for 12 of the HSIs. Based on this index, racial/ethnic disparity in the percent of low birthweight infants declined by 19 percent, disparity in the percent of children under 18 years of age in poverty and in the syphilis case rate declined by 13 percent, and disparity in the stroke death rate declined by 11 percent. The index declined by less than 10 percent for eight other indicators. The index of disparity increased between 1990 and 1998 for the other five HSIs examined here. The index of disparity increased by more than 10 percent for work-related injury death rates, motor vehicle crash death rates, and suicide death rates. While rates for the HSIs have improved, not all groups have benefited equally and substantial differences among racial/ethnic groups persist.

Accidents, Occupational↗

Health status indicators among community-dwelling elders with arthritis: the Bambuí health and aging study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of arthritis with health status indicators among elders living in Bambuí, Brazil. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1606 elders using baseline data from the Bambuí Health and Aging Study, a population based cohort study of older adults. Arthritis was self-reported and defined as a physician diagnosis of arthritis or rheumatism, and/or chronic hand and knee symptoms. Health status indicators, defined a priori as the main independent variables, were self-rated health, psychological distress (based on the General Health Questionnaire), report of sleep complaints, disability in activities of daily living (ADL), "2-week" disability, mobility disability, and 2 composite indexes of mental health problems and physical disability problems. Logistic regression compared health status indicators among elders reporting arthritis (N = 833) and non-arthritis subjects. RESULTS: After controlling for sociodemographics and chronic conditions, all measures were found to be associated with arthritis: sleep complaints (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.43-1.92), fair (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.62-2.90) and poor self-rated health (OR 3.48, 95% CI 2.46-4.94), ADL disability (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.02-2.87), mobility disability (OR 2.65, 95% CI 2.06-3.41), 2-week disability (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.35-2.57), 2 mental health problems (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.67-3.04), and one (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.91-3.16) and 2 physical disability problems (OR 4.19, 95% CI 2.02-8.59). CONCLUSION: Considering the paucity of similar studies addressing the impact of arthritis in developing nations, these findings may be applied to similar communities and support better planning of resource allocations to minimize the effects of arthritis among the elderly.

Aged↗

Year 2000 health status indicators: a profile of California.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the health status of Californians using a set of 18 health status indicators (HSIs) corresponding to goals set forth in Healthy People 2000 and to develop a health status profile for use in research and surveillance, policy development program planning, and program evaluation. METHODS: Federal, state, and county data were used to evaluate California's performance on 18 indicators of health status related to mortality, disease incidence, and health risks. RESULTS: By 1994, California had achieved Year 2000 objectives associated with seven HSIs and significant declines in mortality associated with two other HSIs. Nationally, California was ranked among the states with the lowest rates for infant mortality, lung cancer, female breast cancer, and syphilis but among states with the highest rates for homicide, AIDS, measles, tuberculosis, late prenatal care, childhood poverty, and poor air quality. CONCLUSIONS: California's experience may provide a useful model for other state and local health agencies monitoring the health status of populations using HSIs associated with Year 2000 objectives.

Adolescent↗

Longitudinal relationships between lifestyle and cardiovascular and bone health status indicators in males and females between 13 and 27 years of age; a review of findings from the Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study.

UNLABELLED: The Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study is longitudinal co-hort study on 181 males and females initially aged 13 years, with follow-up measurements at ages 14, 15, 16, 21 and 27 years. METHODS: Anthropometrical, biological and lifestyle parameters, and age 27 also bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine (L2-L4), were measured repeatedly. Adolescent dietary intake and physical activity was related to adult cardiovascular and bone health status indicators by MLR; longitudinal relationships between physical activity and dietary intake, and cardiovascular health status indicators were assessed hy GEE-analysis. RESULTS: Adolescent physical activity was not related to most of the indicators of adult cardiovascular health status, with the exception of a positive relationship with the waist-to-hip in females; in males 'energetic' adolescent physical activity contributed significantly to adult BMD; both in males and females, when taking the entire longitudinal period into account, peak strain physical activity was a relatively more important predictor of adult BMD than 'energetic' physical activity; calcium intake during adolescence was not a significant predictor of bone health status measured at age 27, both in males and females; a consistent significant positive longitudinal relationship was found between physical activity and serum HDL-cholesterol and significant negative longitudinal relationships were found with the subscapular skinfold and with body fat mass; a positive longitudinal relationship was found between serum total cholesterol (TC) and cholesterol intake, saturated fat (SFA) intake and the Keys-score; a negative longitudinal relationship was found between TC and polyunsaturated fit and total energy intake; for HDL a positive longitudinal relationship was found with SFA intake; low tracking was found for physical (in-) activity and dietary intake variables.

Adolescent↗

Healthy People 2000: an assessment based on the Health Status Indicators for the United States and each state.

The Health Status Indicators (HSIs) were developed as part of the Healthy People 2000 process to facilitate the comparison of health status measures at national, State and local levels. In this report, the number of HSIs where the national target has been attained and the number of HSIs that have improved significantly are enumerated for the United States, the District of Columbia, and each State. Based on data for 1998, the United States had attained targets for 6 of the 17 HSIs with national targets. Twenty-three States had attained targets for 9 or more of the HSIs and 37 States had either attained the target for, or had made significant progress on, at least 12 of the indicators. Substantial progress has therefore been made since the Healthy People 2000 National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives were published in 1991.

Forecasting↗

Health status indices and access to medical care.

This paper examines the uses of some health status indices in measuring equity of access to medical care. Empirical examples are provided using data from national surveys of the U.S. population conducted from 1964 through 1976. A simple indicator, mean number of physician visits, suggests that between 1963 and 1976 the poor improved their position relative to the rest of the population and, indeed, currently enjoy the highest level of access. However, a second measure, the use-disability ratio indicates that the poor may still receive less care relative to their need. A third measure, the symptoms-response ratio suggests how norms of appropriate behavior might be incorporated into an access measure.

Disability Evaluation↗

A strategy for developing environmental health indicators for rural Canada.

Our understanding of and ability to describe rural health conditions can be considerably enhanced by the use of rural health indicators which allow us to compare rural and nonrural areas or areas differentially located on the urban-rural continuum in terms of various health conditions. However, while health indicators abound, there are very few that can be used to describe the health conditions of rural Canada. This paper discusses the concepts of health in a rural context and adopts a broad definition of health that goes beyond the mere absence of disease or impairment. We propose five broad categories of health indicators: health status indicators, health determinant indicators, health behaviour indicators, health resource indicators, and health service utilization indicators. The most commonly used health indicators in Canada and the datasets from which they are derived are examined in order to assess their applicability to "communities" or "regions". This review highlights the strengths and limitations of various datasets and indicators and their applicability to the "community" and "regional" scale for rural environments. Finally, challenges in data availability and use are discussed as they relate to rural health indicator development.

Canada↗

Health status indicators for the year 2000: projections for Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.

A consensus set of health status indicators was released in July 1991 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for use by public health officials at the Federal, State, and local levels in identifying and monitoring issues of public health importance. These health status indicators have been projected for the Year 2000 in Allegheny County, PA, with linear regression analyses of historical data. Indications are that mortality rates for black infants, breast cancer mortality, suicide, lung cancer mortality, incidence of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, and the number of measles cases likely will not meet the year 2000 targets in Allegheny County. These data will prove useful in monitoring progress towards the year 2000 objectives and provide comparative data for other geographic areas of the United States with similar demographic characteristics.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗