SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Healthcare equity”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Utilisation and Perceived Value of Genetic Counsellors Within US Haemophilia Treatment Centres.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid advancement of molecular genetics has transformed the diagnosis, treatment, and management of individuals with hereditary bleeding disorders. To provide effective, up-to-date genetic counselling, navigate the complexity of these conditions, and select appropriate molecular testing, genetics expertise is required. AIM: This study assessed the provision of genetic counselling services, involvement of genetic counsellors (GCs), and the perceived value of GCs within haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) in the United States. METHODS: A survey was emailed to 396 HTC providers. Of these, 115 responses were received, representing 68 of 149 US HTCs (45.6% HTC participation rate). Responses were stratified by level of GC engagement. RESULTS: Although GCs have extensive training in genetics, genomics and counselling skills, nearly one-third of respondents (34.9%, n = 38) reported that a GC is not involved with the HTC nor are referrals made. Almost all GC-engaged respondents (98%, n = 22) and GC-referral respondents (95%, n = 20) agreed that 'GCs have a unique skill set that is highly valuable to an HTC clinic' compared to only 62% (n = 20) of non-GC-engaged respondents (p = 0.001). Additionally, respondents noted positive implications of integrating a GC within their HTCs, stating that GCs are 'ideal for optimal patient care'. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the value of a GC within an HTC. This signifies the need to reassess the role of GCs among HTCs to reduce inconsistencies in provision of genetic counselling and increase healthcare equity.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Ethical Governance of Open Data Across Biomedical Research, Healthcare, and Public Health: Privacy, Equity, Trust, and Controlled Access.

Open data has become central to biomedical research and public health, but health information is uniquely sensitive and difficult to share responsibly. In this narrative review, open data is considered as a spectrum of health-data sharing arrangements, ranging from public aggregate datasets to controlled-access repositories, federated analysis, and synthetic data. This narrative review synthesizes the scientific and societal rationale for greater openness with the ethical, legal, and governance constraints that shape what "open" can realistically mean in healthcare. We examine how data sharing supports reproducibility, machine learning, and more efficient research, while also enabling public health surveillance and learning health systems. Against these benefits, we analyze privacy and re-identification risks, consent challenges in large-scale secondary use, inequities including data colonialism, and tensions introduced by commercialization. We integrate lessons from prominent case examples spanning pandemic data sharing, genomic initiatives, population registries, patient-led rare disease infrastructures, and regional data spaces. Across these domains, experience suggests that durable progress depends less on unrestricted openness than on calibrated access, privacy-preserving architectures, clear accountability, and sustained public engagement. We conclude by proposing a pragmatic ethical orientation for healthcare open data: treat openness as a spectrum of controlled sharing arrangements, embed equity and reciprocity into governance, and institutionalize trust-building measures that can persist beyond emergencies and political cycles.

Data colonialism↗

PubMed2026

Availability and public reimbursement of early breast cancer care across European expert centres: a PORTRAIT from an EUSOMA initiative.

BACKGROUND: Cross-country disparities in access to guideline-recommended early breast cancer care persist across Europe. PORTRAIT is a clinician-reported, cross-sectional access study mapping availability and state reimbursement of key services across the early breast cancer pathway. METHODS: A 49-item survey covering diagnostics, pathology and genomics, systemic therapy, surgery, radiotherapy, and supportive care was emailed from June to September 2024 to multidisciplinary teams at one expert breast centre in 42 European countries. Respondents provided a consensus perspective on service availability and reimbursement. Descriptive proportions with full, partial, or no access were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-nine countries responded (93%). Core diagnostics were widely available, but gaps persisted: MRI-guided biopsy was absent in 29% of countries and vacuum-assisted biopsy was fully reimbursed in 66%. Genomic assays were unavailable in 14% and not fully reimbursed in 35%. Public funding gaps were reported for PARP inhibitors (33%) and CDK4/6 inhibitors (26%). Immediate implant-based reconstruction and biological meshes lacked reimbursement in 21% and 33%, respectively. Despite broad availability of hypofractionated radiotherapy, 38% of countries still used per-fraction reimbursement. Psycho-oncology was limited in 35%, fertility preservation in 46%, and patient-reported outcome measures absent in 43%. CONCLUSION: Basic services are nearly universal, but gaps persist in advanced imaging, molecular testing, targeted therapies, radiotherapy reimbursement, reconstructive/oncoplastic surgery, and survivorship care. PORTRAIT identifies practical targets for policy audit, reimbursement alignment, and resource stewardship. Findings reflect clinician perspectives from expert centres, potentially representing best specialist care rather than average national care, and are not population-representative estimates or direct measures of patient outcomes.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Artificial intelligence in healthcare and medicine: clinical applications, therapeutic advances, and future perspectives.

Healthcare systems worldwide face growing challenges, including rising costs, workforce shortages, and disparities in access and quality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool capable of addressing these issues by enhancing diagnostics, treatment planning, patient monitoring, and healthcare efficiency. AI's role in modern medicine spans disease detection, personalized care, drug discovery, predictive analytics, telemedicine, and wearable health technologies. Leveraging machine learning and deep learning, AI can analyze complex data sets, including electronic health records, medical imaging, and genomic profiles, to identify patterns, predict disease progression, and recommend optimized treatment strategies. AI also has the potential to promote equity by enabling cost-effective, resource-efficient solutions in low-resource and remote settings, such as mobile diagnostics, wearable biosensors, and lightweight algorithms. Successful deployment requires addressing critical challenges, including data privacy, algorithmic bias, model interpretability, regulatory oversight, and maintaining human clinical oversight. Emphasizing scalable, ethical, and evidence-driven implementation, key strategies include clinician training in AI literacy, adoption of resource efficient tools, global collaboration, and robust regulatory frameworks to ensure transparency, safety, and accountability. By complementing rather than replacing healthcare professionals, AI can reduce errors, optimize resources, improve patient outcomes, and expand access to quality care. This review emphasizes the responsible integration of AI as a powerful catalyst for innovation, sustainability, and equity in healthcare delivery worldwide.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

(Re)imagining the Future of Genetic Counseling: A Reflexive Qualitative Analysis of Sociopolitical Power, Cultural Safety, Systemic Racism, and Comparative Practice in the United Kingdom, Aotearoa New Zealand and, Australia.

Genetic counseling is undergoing a rapid transformation as genomic medicine becomes embedded within mainstream healthcare systems. At the same time, the profession is being challenged to respond to systemic racism, colonial legacies, technological change, and evolving expectations regarding equity and justice. Historically, genetic counseling emerged within twentieth-century medical genetics and was influenced by political, social, scientific, and medical forces that included eugenic ideology, values, and practices. The profession has since evolved substantially toward psychosocial, patient-centered, and non-directive models of care. Contemporary debates regarding "newgenics" or "neugenics" further demonstrate how concerns regarding equity, reproductive ethics, disability, and genomic stratification continue to shape genomic healthcare discourse. This qualitative reflexive practice paper explores how systemic racism, colonial legacy, cultural safety and structural power shape genetic counseling practice in the United Kingdom (UK), Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia, and how these forces continue to reshape the profession's future identity. A reflexive, narrative, and comparative qualitative approach was employed, grounded in the authors' lived professional experiences across UK and Australasian contexts and informed by purposively selected policy, professional and scholarly literature relating to cultural safety, dignity, anti-racism, and Human Rights-Based Decision-Making. Through iterative reflexive dialogue, comparative analysis, and thematic synthesis, four interrelated themes were developed examining sociopolitical context, systemic racism, cultural safety and technologization within contemporary genetic counseling practice. Comparative analysis identified substantial differences in how culturally responsive practice is conceptualized and operationalized across settings. In Aotearoa, cultural safety is strongly shaped by Te Tiriti o Waitangi, bicultural accountability, and Māori sovereignty frameworks. In Australia, culturally safer genomic care has increasingly developed through Indigenous-led initiatives and workforce reform, including the Australian Alliance for Indigenous Genomics (ALIGN). In contrast, UK practice remains largely situated within equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) frameworks that may insufficiently address systemic racism and structural power within increasingly diverse populations. Reflexive clinical examples demonstrated how inequities may emerge through undocumented patient values, standardized pathways, assumptions regarding autonomy, and misinterpretation of culturally specific communication styles. Re-imagining the future of genetic counseling requires more than just technological advancement. It requires reflexive engagement with dignity, inequity, and the sociopolitical realities of the populations served. These insights re-imagine a culturally grounded, socially responsive future for genetic counseling in an era shaped by genomic mainstreaming, digital transformation, artificial intelligence and workforce reform and one in which the profession remains ethically anchored, relationally attuned, and committed to justice-oriented practice.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Determinants of private health insurance uptake and its association with healthcare utilization in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: a systematic review.

All Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries have a multi-payer healthcare system that comprises governmental health coverage (GHC), funded by the government, and private health insurance (PHI), mainly sponsored by employers and purchased by individuals. Both are expected to influence healthcare utilization and contribute to system efficiency and patient well-being. This systematic review explored the determinants of PHI uptake and its association with healthcare service utilization in the presence of GHC in GCC countries. We systematically searched CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for peer-reviewed studies published between January 2012 and October 2022. Study quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists for both quantitative and qualitative studies, following PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Determinants of PHI uptake were mapped to Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use (BMHSU) and categorized into (1) predisposing factors (sex, age, marital status, and education), (2) enabling factors (employment/income and health system-related factors such as access and perceived service quality), and (3) need factors (health status, including chronic noncommunicable diseases). PHI uptake was positively associated with being male, married, highly educated, employed with a high income, and having chronic diseases. PHI was positively associated with healthcare utilization, particularly routine check-ups, preventive services, and the use of prescribed medicines. In GCC countries, PHI uptake is influenced by sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics, health status, and perceived service quality. PHI is also associated with higher healthcare utilization, underlining the need for evidence-informed policies that enhance equity and expand coverage.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Global vaccine readiness: equity-by-design in pandemic preparedness and response.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 showed that rapid vaccine development and roll-out, while lifesaving, can still yield large, avoidable harms when equity is not considered from the outset. Disparities in vaccine timing and coverage, especially in low-resource settings, amplified health and economic burdens, highlighting the need for preparedness frameworks that combine speed with fairness. AREAS COVERED: We synthesize evidence from literature and policy reports regarding global vaccine roll-out, focusing on avertable mortality under alternative sharing scenarios, procurement design, pooled mechanisms such as COVAX, and the role of distributed manufacturing and delivery capacity. We also examine how transparent data-sharing, effective public communication, genomic surveillance, adaptive trial designs, and modeling hubs can support more responsive and equitable vaccine deployment. Across six reflection points, we translate these lessons into practical priorities for future pandemic readiness, including strengthening healthcare infrastructure, equitable procurement, data transparency, and safeguarding public health decision-making from political and commercial distortion. EXPERT OPINION: We argue that equity-by-design is essential if vaccine innovation is to deliver equitable public health impact. This requires geographically distributed manufacturing, transparency, equity-conditioned advance purchase agreements, and pre-agreed, epidemiology-triggered allocation of vaccines. We recommend institutionalizing disaggregated reporting, standardized data-sharing, greater pathogen genomic sequencing capacity, and communication strategies that support public health protection while countering misinformation.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Systems Factors Contributing to Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Maternal Health: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Despite ongoing efforts to reduce adverse maternal outcomes, including maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity, racial/ethnic disparities in outcomes persist in high-income countries, including the United States (US) and Canada. Limited research has examined hospital-level factors that may drive disparities and contribute to adverse outcomes. This systematic review summarizes factors within the health system contributing to adverse outcomes and racial/ethnic disparities in the US and Canada to inform future policies and practices. METHOD: We searched SCOPUS, PubMed, EBSCOhost, and ProQuest Healthcare Administration for studies that reported hospital-level factors contributing to adverse maternal outcomes and racial/ethnic disparities. The review followed a two-stage screening process. The risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The System Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) 2.0 framework guided the identification and categorization of factors. RESULTS: Of 2441 studies retrieved, 30 met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-eight studies were conducted in the US, and 2 were conducted in Canada. The review included 16 qualitative, 11 quantitative, and 3 mixed-methods studies. We identified 60 factors associated with different system components, including person(s) (12%), tasks (28%), tools and technology (7%), internal environment (10%), organization (28%), and external environment (15%). Shortage of resources, including staffing, poor care coordination, and discriminatory organizational practices, were key factors described in the studies. CONCLUSION: Addressing health system factors in addition to broader societal factors is important to reduce adverse outcomes and promote equity for all women and birthing persons.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Disparities in guideline-adherent cardiovascular preventive care for people with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines offer guidance on delaying the progression of cardiovascular disease in people living with diabetes. We sought to determine whether guideline-recommended cardiovascular preventive care for people living with diabetes differs according to sociodemographic indicators, globally. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies that compared the sociodemographic characteristics of people diagnosed with type 1 or 2 diabetes who received cardiovascular preventive care as recommended by guidelines to those who did not. Sociodemographic predictors were defined by PROGRESS+ (an equity framework). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and APA PsychInfo from 2010 to January 21, 2026. Studies were screened independently by two people. One person assessed the risk of bias and extracted data, and another verified. We pooled results using a random-effects model and assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included. Meta-analyses showed female, Black, and Hispanic individuals had slightly lower odds of receiving guideline-recommended prescriptions for lipid-lowering medication compared to Male, and White individuals, respectively (OR:0.89, 95%CI:0.79,1.00, moderate certainty; OR:0.78, 95%CI:0.74,0.81, high certainty; OR:0.86, 95%CI:0.59,1.26, low certainty). Individuals aged 18-45 years had moderately lower odds (OR:0.33, 95%CI:0.19,0.57, moderate certainty), no observed association for Asian individuals. Asian individuals had moderately lower odds of antihypertensive medication prescription (OR:0.42, 95%CI:0.38,0.46, high certainty). Evidence suggests likely no association between HbA1c testing and sex/gender or between sex/gender and lipid panel testing. CONCLUSIONS: Some disparities in guideline-recommended cardiovascular preventive care among people living with diabetes were found. These results are consistent with previous reviews and highlight the need to ensure guidelines consider equity and with improved dissemination.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Digital healthcare solutions in preoperative care: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Active participation in preoperative anesthesia preparation is crucial to ensure safe and efficient care. Compliance with preoperative instructions improves clinical outcomes, enhances patient satisfaction and optimizes use of healthcare resources. As digital communication becomes increasingly integrated into healthcare, interactive digital tools such as smartphone applications and Short Message Service (SMS) reminders may offer a valuable means of engaging patients in their own care. In this review, we evaluated the role of digital tools in guiding patients during their preoperative care pathway for anesthesia. METHODS: Following registration (CRD420250655119), we conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating the use of smartphone applications or SMS reminders designed to support preoperative preparation for anesthesia or procedural sedation in adult patients undergoing elective procedures. The primary outcome was compliance with preoperative instructions. Secondary outcomes included rate of late cancellations, patient satisfaction and cost-effectiveness. Studies were eligible if they reported at least one of these outcomes. RESULTS: Ten studies (1 RCT and 9 observational studies), including 11501 participants, were identified. Compliance with preoperative instructions was assessed in 8 studies, most of which reported higher compliance in patients receiving digital interventions across multiple instruction domains, although statistical significance was not consistently observed. Evidence suggested a beneficial effect on reducing late cancellations and improving patient satisfaction. However, results varied across study designs, and data on cost-effectiveness were limited. CONCLUSIONS: Digital tools for preoperative anesthesia guidance were associated with higher compliance and showed potential reduction of late cancellations and increase of patient satisfaction. However, the current evidence is predominantly observational and heterogeneous, limiting the strength of conclusions. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: With healthcare systems under pressure, digital technologies may offer a scalable and patient-centered care solution to support preoperative anesthesia preparation. Nonetheless, further high-quality research is needed to evaluate their long-term clinical, economic and equity implications.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Recruiting participants to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is challenging. Identifying effective recruitment strategies would benefit health research: poor recruitment leads to underpowered trials, reducing the reliability of findings and increasing the risk of wasted resources, ethical concerns, and trial failure. Evidence to inform recruitment strategies is increasingly generated through Studies Within A Trial (SWATs), which are methodological studies embedded within host RCTs. This is an update of a review last published in 2018. OBJECTIVES: Primary: to quantify the effects of strategies to improve recruitment of participants to RCTs. Secondary: to evaluate recruitment strategies' cost-effectiveness and impact on retention, and the equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) characteristics of recruited participants. SEARCH METHODS: We used MEDLINE, Embase, and six other databases to identify the studies included in the review. We also sought unpublished recruitment SWATs through social media and targeted email dissemination to trial methodology networks. The latest search date was 16 February 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised SWATs evaluating trial recruitment strategies embedded in healthcare and non-healthcare trials. We excluded quasi-randomised, hypothetical, questionnaire-only, retention-only, or clinician incentive studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Primary outcome: proportion of eligible participants or centres recruited. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: cost-effectiveness, retention rates, and EDI characteristics of included participants. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis for strategies evaluated in at least two studies; otherwise, we synthesised results narratively. We reported effects as risk differences (RDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and assessed between-trial heterogeneity. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for the primary outcome. We expressed cost-effectiveness as the incremental cost per additional participant recruited in pounds sterling (GBP). MAIN RESULTS: We identified 91 eligible studies (53 new to this update), providing 94 comparisons and involving at least 176,747 participants. Eighty-one studies involved strategies aimed at trial participants, while 10 evaluated strategies aimed at recruiters. All were healthcare studies. We found 65 recruitment strategies; 49 were evaluated in a single study. Only five strategies were supported by high-certainty evidence according to GRADE criteria, and we focus on these strategies in the summary below. Open-label trials versus blinded, placebo trials. Open-label trials recruited more participants than blinded trials (RD 10%, 95% CI 8% to 12%; 3 studies, 9004 participants), corresponding to approximately 10 additional participants per 100 approached. The studies involved mostly women in the UK and Estonia. No cost or retention data were reported. Telephone reminder versus no telephone reminder. Telephone reminders to people who did not respond to an initial postal invitation boosted recruitment by 6% (95% CI 3% to 9%; 2 studies, 1450 participants), in trials with low underlying recruitment (we are less certain for trials with over 10% recruitment). The studies involved people with a mean age of 58 years in Canada and Norway. No cost or retention data were reported. Recruitment primer letter versus no letter. Pre-recruitment letters and leaflets designed to encourage participation made little or no difference to recruitment (absolute improvement 1%, 95% CI -1% to 2%; 2 studies, 5376 participants), and were associated with increased costs compared to not sending a primer (incremental cost: GBP 2.08). The studies involved mostly older white people in the UK and Ireland. Multimedia information via a digital link/QR code plus paper participant information leaflet (PIL) versus paper PIL alone. This made little or no difference to recruitment (absolute improvement 0%, 95% CI -1% to 1%; 7 studies, 11,612 participants) and retention (absolute improvement 0%, 95% CI -2% to 3%; 5 studies, 7403 participants), and increased costs compared to not including multimedia information (incremental cost: GBP 0.78). The studies involved people in the UK. Optimised, user-tested PIL versus standard PIL. Optimising participant information leaflets (e.g. through user-testing the leaflet with the target population to shape its content, format, and appearance) made little or no difference to recruitment: absolute improvement was 0% (95% CI 0% to 1%; 6 studies, 27,805 participants). The studies involved people in the UK. Only one study reported EDI data; participants were mostly older women. No cost or retention data were reported. We had moderate-certainty evidence for 13 other strategies; confidence was often reduced because the results came from single studies. Seven strategies involved changes to how potential participants received information; four involved changes to trial conduct; one targeted the recruiter or recruitment site; and one tested non-monetary incentives. We had much less confidence in the other 47 comparisons because the studies had design flaws, were single studies, or had very uncertain results. Costs were reported in only 17 of 91 studies. Strategy impact on retention was reported in 15 studies. All but one study (99%) were from high-income countries. The most reported demographics were age (49 studies), sex (32 studies), gender (27 studies), and education level (16 studies). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence on strategies to improve trial recruitment remains broad but lacks depth. Of 65 strategies evaluated, only five were supported by high-certainty evidence. Open-label trial designs and telephone reminders to non-responders increased recruitment, while optimised participant information leaflets, recruitment primer letters, and multimedia information provided alongside a paper participant information leaflet had little or no effect. Reporting of participant characteristics was poor, limiting assessment of equity, diversity, and inclusion across most studies. Evidence is heavily skewed toward high-income countries. Future research must prioritise evaluations in low-to-middle-income settings and consistently report cost, retention, and EDI outcomes. We strongly urge the methodology research community to strengthen the evidence base by prioritising replications of existing strategies over the development and testing of new ones. FUNDING: National Institute for Health and Care Research (Advanced Fellowship, Adwoa Parker, reference:NIHR302256). Health Research Board, Republic of Ireland, Evidence Synthesis Ireland (grant ESI-2021-001) REGISTRATION: This review updates an earlier Cochrane review, which was first published in 2002 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2010, and 2018. Previous versions of the review and their protocols are available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub2 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub3 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub4 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub5 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub6.

Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2026

Leading with Innovation: Maternal Health Transformation in New York City Health + Hospitals.

New York City's (NYC) maternal health crisis drew close attention in the late 2010s, driven by alarming data: Approximately 30 women died annually during childbirth in NYC, Black non-Hispanic women were 12 times more likely to die than white women, and more than 3,000 women experienced life-threatening birth complications each year. In response, NYC committed $12.8 million in July 2018 to reduce maternal mortality and eliminate racial disparities.NYC Health + Hospitals (H+H)-the nation's largest public health system, serving 1.1 million patients annually with roughly 15,000 births per year-became the primary vehicle for this initiative. With 80 percent of the system's deliveries covered by Medicaid and a patient population that is 51.2 percent Hispanic and 27.1 percent Black, H+H is uniquely positioned to lead the fight against maternal health inequity.Three flagship programs anchor H+H's response to the city's maternal mortality rate. The OB Simulation Program, launched in 2012 and expanded in 2018, was the first in the nation to use mannequins of color to train thousands of providers in obstetric emergencies. The Maternal Home Program, piloted at H+H's Kings County Hospital in 2019 and scaled system-wide by 2021, has served more than 10,341 patients, generating more than 33,000 referrals for social, behavioral health, and community resources. The Cardio-Obstetrics Program located at Kings County Hospital targets cardiovascular disease-the leading cause of maternal death among Black women-through screening, education, and community outreach. These programs are a health equity imperative, made more urgent by impending federal Medicaid cuts resulting from the H.R.1 One Big Beautiful Bill Act (passed on July 4, 2025).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Latin American consensus on the medical oncologic management of early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer: Addressing regional disparities in Spanish-speaking countries.

PURPOSE: Substantial disparities persist in managing early-stage hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer across Spanish-speaking Latin America, including limited access to genomic testing, systemic therapies, and fertility preservation. The Latin American Breast Cancer Association (LABCA) convened an expert panel to produce the first consensus tailored to Spanish-speaking countries. METHODS: A literature review (Embase, PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalKey, LILACS; 2014-2025), informed by ESMO/ASCO/NCCN/SEOM guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024565706), supported statement development. A steering committee of three experts of Spanish nationality supervised the process. Twenty-one specialists from 11 countries participated in a modified Delphi process; 31 items were voted in Round 1 and 25 statements were retained within scope. Consensus was pre-defined as ≥80% agreement (or median 7-9), with a mean/outlier rule reported alongside. RESULTS: Applying the ≥80% rule, 22 of 25 statements (88%) reached full consensus; three (1.3, 2.4, 3.3; 75-76%) were near-consensus and retained with caveats. Recommendations integrated clinicopathologic and molecular factors to guide risk stratification; genomic assays were reserved for selected scenarios and discouraged in very low-risk tumors or ≥4 positive lymph nodes. Consensus also covered ovarian suppression plus endocrine therapy, fertility preservation, sexual-health and genetic evaluation, and adjuvant CDK4/6 and PARP inhibitors when accessible. Marked heterogeneity in access was documented by country and sector. CONCLUSION: This consensus provides the first region-specific, evidence-based, resource-adapted recommendations for early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer in Spanish-speaking Latin America, aiming to reduce disparities and strengthen equitable oncology care.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Pilot Evaluation of a Digital Pretest Education Platform for Genomic Counseling: Perspectives of Health Care Providers and Patients.

Traditional in-person consultations for genetic services create access barriers. We hypothesized that the Genetics Adviser platform-a web-based digital platform delivering clinical genomic services-could reduce these barriers. Focusing on pretest education and counseling, we tested a pilot version of the platform in medical genetics and pediatric endocrinology group practices. The multimethod design consisted of quantitative patient and caregiver surveys, Google Analytics data, and qualitative healthcare provider interviews. Surveys included validated measures of acceptability and empowerment. Transcribed interviews were thematically coded and analyzed using NVivo. Of the 102 patients and caregivers targeted for this study, 85/102 (83%) accessed the platform, 71/102 (70%) proceeded beyond the landing page, and 60/102 (59%) completed the post-module survey. Users expressed high confidence in genetic understanding and empowerment (Genomics Outcome Scale [GOS]: 77/100), and providers noted potential benefits and highlighted technological and content-related limitations. Further research is needed to validate effectiveness across diverse populations and to evaluate long-term impacts on patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

IMPROVE kidney care: perspectives from marginalised people with CKD and risk factors for CKD on access to, and experience of, kidney care services: a cross-sector collaborative exploration, employing qualitative approaches.

BACKGROUND: Access to, and experience of, chronic kidney disease (CKD) care is inequitable-with barriers to accessing quality care for marginalised groups. We conducted an exploratory study employing qualitative approaches to understand the factors that influence access to, and experience of, healthcare services for marginalised people with CKD and at risk of CKD. METHODS: An exploratory study employing qualitative approaches was conducted as a cross-sector collaboration between kidney care services and an activist, antiracist community-based research and social justice organisation (Mabadiliko Community Interest Company (CIC)). Two groups were recruited: 1) those with risk factors for CKD or early-stage CKD, and 2) people who presented late to kidney care services. Semi-structured interviews were co-designed with people with lived experience and conducted by Mabadiliko CIC. Thematic analysis was undertaken, with themes refined by participants. RESULTS: Twenty interviews were undertaken with a diverse cohort of participants. Knowledge and awareness of CKD was limited, and compounded by a lack of delivery of accessible, culturally congruent information. Significant barriers to accessing kidney care exist for marginalised people, including people who are from global majority ethnic backgrounds, Disabled people, and/or people experiencing material hardship. These barriers are compounded by interpersonal discrimination and paternalistic power dynamics within healthcare interactions. CONCLUSION: This study captures the experiences of marginalised people at different stages of their journey with CKD, in accessing and engaging with kidney care services. Participants faced a complex array of challenges, highlighting opportunities for multi-level intervention. We outline recommendations to address these issues, co-developed with participants.

chronic kidney disease↗

PubMed2026

Neighborhood Deprivation and Screening Mammography Utilization: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Access to screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality disparities. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a validated measure of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage linked to adverse health outcomes. There is limited data evaluating mammography utilization among patients residing in areas of higher deprivation. This study evaluated the association between ADI and screening mammography utilization within an accountable care organization (ACO) affiliated with a multicenter academic medical center in the Upper Midwest. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included women aged 40-85 years attributed to the ACO in 2022, based on Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality criteria. The primary outcome was receipt of screening mammography within two years. The primary exposure was ADI, analyzed by decile (ordinal) and as low (deciles 1-5) versus high (deciles 6-10) deprivation. The logistic regression models evaluated associations between ADI and screening, unadjusted and adjusted for age, race, ethnicity, and preferred language. RESULTS: Among 7463 participants with geographic data, 74.4% completed screening. Screening rates were 75.7% in low-deprivation areas versus 66.2% in high-deprivation areas. Increasing ADI decile was associated with reduced screening in unadjusted (OR 0.891, 95% CI 0.87-0.91, p<0.001) and adjusted analyses (OR 0.897, 95% CI 0.88-0.92, p<0.001). Black participants (OR 0.444, p<0.001) and individuals preferring non-English languages (OR 0.333, p<0.001) had lower screening odds after adjustment. CONCLUSION: Higher neighborhood deprivation is independently associated with lower screening mammography utilization. Targeted, equity-focused interventions addressing neighborhood, racial, and language-related barriers are needed to reduce screening disparities.

Area deprivation Index↗

PubMed2026

Updated ENIGMA recommendations for reporting germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes and their translation into twenty languages.

Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility underpins precision cancer prevention and care. Gaps in the healthcare providers' genetic literacy and an ambiguous lexicon for variant description may hinder proper delivery and clinical application of consistently trustworthy test results. The Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) international consortium supports controlled terminology and recommends a framework for reporting germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes, using breast cancer as an exemplar. Moving forward towards terminological coherence across disciplines and borders, the ENIGMA Clinical Working Group launched a multinational effort to release consortium-approved translations of the published recommendations. The herein reported Vocabulary Translation Project offered an opportunity to reappraise and align the reference text to the recent BRCA1 and BRCA2 specifications to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology rules by the ENIGMA Variant Curation Expert Panel and to highlight country-specific differences in breast cancer risk assessment and management. The updated recommendations and their 20 translations are now provided as easy to handle documents, covering 11 of the most widely spoken languages in the world. They will contribute to minimised erroneous inferences, more informed decision-making, improved health outcomes and equity in the use of genetic testing for cancer predisposition and in translational oncology.

Humans↗