PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Hemodiafiltration”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1993

A prospective comparative study of continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration in critically ill patients.

We have prospectively studied and compared two consecutive groups of critically ill patients treated with either continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration (CAVHD) (n = 28) or continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHD) (n = 25) to establish the technique of choice. The two groups were comparable in mean age (59 v 58 years), mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (29.6 v 27.4, P = NS), requirements for inotropic drugs, and mean number of failing organs (2.9 v 3.2). CVVHD led to a greater amount of hourly ultrafiltrate (mean, 590 v 424 mL; P < 0.001), but urea and creatinine clearances were not significantly different with the two techniques. Twelve patients survived in the CAVHD group (42.8%) and 13 in the CVVHD group (52%; P = NS). The major advantage for CVVHD use was the substantial decrease in the number of access-related complications (2 v 10; P < 0.025). We conclude that while CVVHD does not offer a significant increase in solute clearance, it significantly minimizes vascular access-related morbidity and should therefore be regarded as the therapeutic modality of choice.

Chi-Square Distribution↗
PubMed2003

Change from three times a week on-line hemodiafiltration to short daily on-line hemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND: Daily dialysis has shown excellent clinical results because a higher frequency of dialysis is more physiologic. On-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is a HDF technique that combines diffusion with high convection in which the dialysis fluid itself is used as a reinfusion solution. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the beneficial effect of the more effective dialysis schedule (daily dialysis) with the dialysis modality that offers the highest uremic toxin removal (on-line HDF). METHODS: Eight patients, six males and two females, on standard 4 to 5 hours three times a week OL-HDF (S-OL-HDF) were switched to daily OL-HDF (D-OL-HDF) 2 to 21/2 hours six times per week. Dialysis parameters were identical during both periods and only frequency and dialysis time of each session were changed. Tolerance, uremic toxin removal, urea kinetics, biochemical and anemia profiles, blood pressure, and left ventricular hypertrophy were evaluated. RESULTS: D-OL-HDF was well accepted and tolerated. The disappearance of postdialysis fatigue was rapidly reported by patients. Patients mantained the same [time average concentration (TAC) and weekly single-pool Kt/V (spKt/V)] throughout the study. However, equivalent renal urea clearance (EKR), standard Kt/V and weekly urea reduction ratio (URR) were increased during D-OL-HDF. Weekly urea, creatinine, osteocalcin, beta2-microglobulin, myoglobin, and prolactin reduction ratios were improved with D-OL-HDF. There was a significant decrease in predialysis plasma levels of urea, creatinine, acid uric, beta2-microglobulin and homocysteine over 6 months. Phosphate binders were reduced and antihypertensive drugs were stopped. A 30% regression of left ventricular mass was observed. CONCLUSION: The change from S-OL-HDF to D-OL-HDF was well tolerated. Disappearance of postdialysis fatigue, better dialysis adequacy, a higher removal of middle and large molecules, a reduction of phosphate binders, improvement of status nutritional, and an important reduction of cardiovascular risk factors were observed.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Clinical cross-over comparison of mid-dilution hemodiafiltration using a novel dialyzer concept and post-dilution hemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have indicated that the improved elimination of middle molecules by convective renal replacement procedures might be associated with a better outcome in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). On-line mid-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) with the Nephros OLpur MD 190 hemodiafilter represents a novel extracorporeal renal replacement therapy concept to increase the removal of middle molecules. METHODS: In a prospective cross-over study in 10 ESRD patients, this technique was compared to on-line post-dilution HDF with a conventional synthetic high-flux dialyzer, operated at its technical limit, concerning small and middle molecular solute removal. Each patient was treated 3 times for 4.0 +/- 0.4 hours with both filters. Blood flow was 400 mL/min, substitution flow (Q(S)) during mid-dilution HDF 200 mL/min, and during post-dilution HDF 100 mL/min, and effective dialysate flow of 700 - Q(S) mL/min. Instantaneous clearances, reduction ratios (RR), and middle molecule mass transfer in continuously collected dialysate were determined. RESULTS: While urea and creatinine clearances were significantly lower (6.4% and 3.9%, respectively), middle molecule removal was much more efficient in mid-dilution HDF over the whole range of investigated proteins: compared to post-dilution HDF, beta(2)-microglobulin (11.8 kD) clearance (165.8 +/- 26.59 vs. 201.9 +/- 20.63 mL/min; P < 0.001), RR (80.0 +/- 5.4% vs. 82.2 +/- 5.7%; P < 0.001), and dialysate mass transfer (53% higher; P < 0.001) were significantly higher. For the larger middle molecules, cystatin C (13.4 kD) and retinol-binding protein (21.2 kD), mid-dilution HDF resulted in an even more superior performance, indicated by significantly higher values of all investigated parameters. CONCLUSION: On-line mid-dilution HDF with the Nephros OLpur MD 190 hemodiafilter appears to be a true technologic step ahead in terms of improved middle molecule removal. This efficient procedure gives hope to play a role in preventing or at least retarding dialysis-related long-term complications, such as beta(2)m amyloidosis, in ESRD patients, and may contribute to a more adequate dialysis therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

On-line hemodiafiltration as routine treatment of end-stage renal failure: why pre- or mixed dilution mode is necessary in on-line hemodiafiltration today?

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is a well-recognized treatment modality that offers a way of optimizing renal replacement therapy efficacy of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. On-line production of substitution fluid by the 'cold sterilization' process (ultrafiltration) gives access to an unlimited amount of sterile and non-pyrogenic IV grade solution. This advantageous low-cost solution may therefore be employed to develop various forms of high-flux HDF modalities (ol-HDF). High-flux post-dilutional HDF (post-HDF) has mainly been used in clinical practice since it offers the most efficient and best compromise between diffusive and convective clearances. Nowadays, the new targets in anemia correction have created hemorheological conditions that render high filtration rate more difficult to achieve and/or at the expense of higher transmembrane pressure. To overcome this new challenging condition and keeping the same concept, it has been proposed to develop alternative modalities with various sites of fluid substitution (predilution, mixed pre-post with various percentages) in HDF. In this presentation we discuss the benefits of using pre-HDF and show how to match performances with post-HDF. Potential advantages of new ol-HDF options (pre-, mixed and mid-dilution) that are advocated have to be demonstrated in clinical trials. On-line HDF is a multipurpose treatment method that is employed to improve care and outcomes of ESRD patients. Due to its versatility, ol-HDF should be considered as a technical platform permitting to personalize and tailor treatment to patients' needs. The mode of substitution (post-, pre-, mixed or mid-dilution) should be established according to hemorheological conditions of the individual patient.

Dialysis Solutions↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Full protein alimentation and nitrogen equilibrium in a renal failure patient treated with continuous hemodiafiltration: a case report of 67 days of continuous hemodiafiltration.

Standard care for patients with renal failure while in an intensive care unit involves traditional hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis and protein restriction. We present a case of a patient with renal failure supported with continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration with dialysis (CAVH-D) who was given full protein alimentation. Total daily urea clearance was measured from the CAVH-D output. Protein load was 196 +/- 34 g/day while receiving total parenteral nutrition and 164 +/- 30 g/day while receiving enteral alimentation. Serum blood urea nitrogen was controlled between 40 and 75 mg/dL, except during septic episodes. Nitrogen balance was estimated based upon known alimentation protein load and measurable and estimated nitrogenous losses. The patient was potentially in nitrogen equilibrium during most of the dialysis period. The cumulative nitrogen balance was positive by 5.2 g after 67 days of dialysis. Volume of alimentation was 3.49 +/- 0.7 liters/day. With CAVH-D, the renal failure patient can receive full alimentation without volume or protein load limitations. Furthermore, nitrogen balances can be estimated easily while the patient is on CAVH-D.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed1994

Urea removal during continuous hemodiafiltration.

OBJECTIVE: To compare urea nitrogen removal by continuous hemodiafiltration vs. functional native kidneys in critically ill, septic patients receiving > 2 g of amino acids/kg body weight per day. DESIGN: Prospective, comparative, unblinded study. SETTING: Trauma critical care units of a Level I adult trauma hospital. PATIENTS: Fifteen septic patients with multiple organ failure including renal failure who were receiving continuous hemodiafiltration; 11 septic patients with multiple organ failure without renal failure (control group). Ages of patients ranged from 18 to 60 yrs. INTERVENTIONS: Collection of effluent (dialysate + ultrafiltrate) from hemodiafilters. Collection of urine from control patients. MEASUREMENTS: Urea nitrogen and creatinine concentrations in blood, urine, and the hemodiafiltration effluent, measured every 24 hrs for 6 days. Effluent and urine volumes were measured. MAIN RESULTS: Hemodiafilters were operational for 21.8 +/- 3.0 hrs/day. Mean urea nitrogen removal in the renal failure group was 28 +/- 10 g/day. Blood urea nitrogen was stable over the 6-day study period. In control subjects, urea nitrogen removal was 27 +/- 9 g/day, which was not significantly different from the continuous hemodiafiltration group. Blood urea nitrogen concentrations in control patients increased over the 6-day study period (p < .05). Urea nitrogen removal correlated moderately well with amino acid intake in the control group (r2 = .30), but not in the continuous hemodiafiltration group (r2 = .0004). In patients receiving continuous hemodiafiltration, effluent volume was most significantly correlated with urea nitrogen removal (r2 = .69). CONCLUSIONS: The technique of continuous hemodiafiltration can remove substantial amounts of urea nitrogen, similar to that of normal native kidneys. In addition, at amino acid intake rates of > 2 g/kg body weight/day, urea nitrogen removal during continuous hemodiafiltration remains a function of effluent volume, so there is no need to restrict amino acid intake in acute renal failure patients supported with continuous hemodiafiltration.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed2003

On-line mixed hemodiafiltration with a feedback for ultrafiltration control: effect on middle-molecule removal.

BACKGROUND: Increased middle-molecular uremic toxin removal seems to favorably influence survival in dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to verify if, in on-line mixed hemodiafiltration, solute removal by convection may be enhanced by forcing the ultrafiltration rate (QUF) and optimizing the infusion technique in order to achieve the highest possible filtration fraction (FF). METHODS: Removal of beta2-microglobulin (beta2-m), urea, creatinine, and phosphate were compared in 20 patients randomly submitted to one dialysis session (A), one postdilution hemodiafiltration session (B), and three sessions of mixed hemodiafiltration (C, D, and E) at different infusion rates (QS). In mixed hemodiafiltration, a newly developed feedback system automatically maintained the transmembrane pressure (TMP) within its highest range of safety (250 to 300 mm Hg) at constant QUF, while ensuring the maximum FF by splitting infusion between pre- and postdilution. RESULTS: A mean QS of 134 +/- 20 mL/min (mean FF = 0.65) was attained in post-HDF, and up to 307 +/- 41 mL/min (mean FF = 0.69) in mixed hemodiafiltration. The mean dialysate clearances (KDQ) for all tested solutes and urea eKt/V were significantly higher in all hemodiafiltration sessions than in dialysis. Only in the case of urea did the infusion mode have no significant effect. KDQ for beta2-m was maximal in session D and significantly higher than in session B (90.2 +/- 11 mL/min vs. 77.5 +/- 11 mL/min; P = 0.02). KDQ for beta2-m significantly correlated with QS and the plasma water flow rate (QPW). The highest KDQ for beta2-m was found at values of QS approximately QPW. Beyond this value KDQ decreased. CONCLUSION: The mixed infusion mode in hemodiafiltration, controlled by the TMP-ultrafiltration feedback, seems to improve the efficiency of hemodiafiltration by fully exploiting the convective mechanism of solute removal. The feedback automatically adjusted the infusion rate and site to the maximum FF taking into account flow conditions, internal pressures, and hydraulic permeability of the dialyzer and their complex interactions.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

A comparison of on-line hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis: a prospective clinical study.

Some of the morbidity associated with chronic hemodialysis is thought to result from retention of large molecular weight solutes that are poorly removed by diffusion in conventional hemodialysis. Hemodiafiltration combines convective and diffusive solute removal in a single therapy. The hypothesis that hemodiafiltration provides better solute removal than high-flux hemodialysis was tested in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomized to either on-line postdilution hemodiafiltration or high-flux hemodialysis. The groups did not differ in body size, treatment time, blood flow rate, or net fluid removal. The filtration volume in hemodiafiltration was 21 +/-1 L. Therapy prescriptions were unchanged for a 12-mo study period. Removal of both small (urea and creatinine) and large (ss(2)-microglobulin and complement factor D) solutes was significantly greater for hemodiafiltration than for high-flux hemodialysis. The increased urea and creatinine removal did not result in lower pretreatment serum concentrations in the hemodiafiltration group. Pretreatment plasma beta(2)-microglobulin concentrations decreased with time (P< 0.001); however, the decrease was similar for both therapies (P = 0.317). Pretreatment plasma complement factor D concentrations also decreased with time (P<0.001), and the decrease was significantly greater with hemodiafiltration than with high-flux hemodialysis (P = 0.010). The conclusion is that on-line hemodiafiltration provides superior solute removal to high-flux hemodialysis over a wide molecular weight range. The improved removal may not result in lower pretreatment plasma concentrations, however, possibly because of limitations in mass transfer rates within the body.

Anemia↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Nutritional effect of continuous hemodiafiltration.

Continuous arterial-venous and veno-venous hemodiafiltration are reliable methods of renal replacement therapy and are particularly suited to critically ill patients in acute renal failure. Fluid and uremic toxin removal from continuous hemodiafiltration is sufficient to allow unrestricted nutrition support. However, the hemodiafilter cannot discriminate between uremic toxins and nutrients. Therefore, the potential exists for significant nutrient loss during continuous hemodiafiltration. Amino acid loss during continuous hemodiafiltration is approximately 10-15 g/day, although in individual cases > or = 30 g/day can be lost. Neither lipids nor intact proteins are lost to any appreciable degree during continuous hemodiafiltration. Small amounts of glucose are lost if dextrose-free dialysate is used for dialysis. If dextrose-containing dialysate is used, significant amounts of glucose can be absorbed (35-45% of the infused glucose). Fluid replacement with dextrose-containing electrolyte solutions can also lead to significant infusion of glucose. Vitamin and mineral losses during continuous hemodiafiltration are not known; neither are the vitamin requirements for patients receiving continuous hemodiafiltration. Effects of continuous hemodiafiltration on vitamin and mineral loss and status remain an important research question.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed2003

Inflammatory response to cardiac bypass in ewe fetuses: effects of steroid administration or continuous hemodiafiltration.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the effectiveness of glucocorticoid administration or continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration on endothelin and corticotropin-releasing factor release or clearance during prolonged fetal cardiac bypass and on the overall performance of fetuses. METHODS: Circulating endothelin 1, 2, and 3 and corticotropin-releasing factor levels were measured in fetal ewes during a 60-minute cardiac bypass period performed with an inline axial flow pump. Blood samples were collected before, during, and 90 minutes after cardiac bypass. Animals were divided into 4 groups. The betamethasone group (n = 6) received maternal treatment with 12 mg of betamethasone 1 and 2 days before the experiment. The methylprednisolone group (n = 5) received fetal treatment with 40 mg/kg intravenous methylprednisolone at the beginning of cardiac bypass. The continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration group (n = 4) underwent continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration with a 0.3-m(2) polysulfone filter during cardiac bypass. The final group was the control group (n = 4). RESULTS: Maternal steroid pretreatment failed to decrease endothelin or corticotropin-releasing factor production when compared with levels in the control animals. Fetal treatment with methylprednisolone produced a significant decrease in endothelin 2 production during cardiac bypass (P <.02) and endothelin 1 production at the end of the experiment (P <.02). Continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration blocked completely the increase of endothelin and corticotropin-releasing factor levels during cardiac bypass (P <.02), which was maintained 90 minutes after cardiac bypass. Acid-base balance was preserved during cardiac bypass by the continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration but worsened after disconnection of the extracorporeal circuit, whereas animals treated with methylprednisolone had better pH, Paco(2), and bicarbonate levels by the end of the experiment. The overall tolerance of the procedure was better in the continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration group during cardiac bypass and in the methylprednisolone group at the end of the experiment. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration provides sustained stability of endothelin levels during fetal cardiac bypass. This technique might help, in association with fetal steroid treatment, to contain the inflammatory response leading to postbypass placental dysfunction.

Acid-Base Equilibrium↗
PubMed2001

Usefulness of plasma exchange plus continuous hemodiafiltration to reduce adverse effects associated with plasma exchange in patients with acute liver failure.

OBJECTIVE: To efficiently remove middle-molecular-weight substances such as hepatic toxins and minimize adverse effects associated with plasma exchange implementation, we have performed plasma exchange slowly in combination with continuous hemodiafiltration. This study was designed to determine the usefulness of plasma exchange with continuous hemodiafiltration in reducing the adverse effects associated with implementation of plasma exchange alone. DESIGN: A retrospective clinical study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: The study involved 90 patients with liver failure who had been treated with plasma exchange in our department over the past 12 yrs. We examined these patients by dividing them into two groups (48 patients treated with plasma exchange alone and 42 patients treated with plasma exchange plus continuous hemodiafiltration at the time of plasma exchange implementation). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline blood Na+ concentration, HCO3- concentration, and colloid osmotic pressure were followed after implementation of plasma exchange to compare the frequency of development of three adverse effects (hypernatremia, metabolic alkalosis, and sharp decrease in colloid osmotic pressure) in the two groups. Hypernatremia was found in 26.7% of treatments in the group with plasma exchange alone and 3.3% in the group of plasma exchange plus continuous hemodiafiltration, and metabolic alkalosis was found in 30.6% of treatments in the group with plasma exchange alone and 4.9% in the group of plasma exchange plus continuous hemodiafiltration; both percentages were significantly higher in the group with plasma exchange alone (p <.001). A sharp decrease in colloid osmotic pressure occurred in 13.3% of treatments in the group with plasma exchange alone but was not observed at all in the patients treated with plasma exchange plus continuous hemodiafiltration. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that adverse effects associated with plasma exchange for artificial liver support for liver failure can be alleviated with use of plasma exchange plus continuous hemodiafiltration instead of plasma exchange alone.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of solute clearance during continuous hemofiltration, hemodiafiltration, and hemodialysis using a polysulfone hemofilter.

The clearance of urea, creatinine, amino acids, vancomycin, and phenytoin was measured in vivo in a small animal model during continuous venovenous (CVV) hemofiltration, CVV hemodiafiltration, and CVV hemodialysis using a 0.25 m2 polysulfone hemofilter. Six domestic piglets (weighing 6-11.8 kg) each received 1 hr of all three techniques in random order. Blood flow was 50 ml/min. During CVV hemofiltration, filtrate production was 500 ml/hr and dialysate flow was zero. During CVV hemodiafiltration, filtrate production was 250 ml/hr and dialysate flow was 250 ml/hr. During CVV hemodialysis, net filtrate production was zero and dialysate flow was 500 ml/hr. The ratio of concentration of solute in filter effluent to concentration in whole plasma was derived for each solute during each of the three techniques. Mean (SD) effluent:plasma ratio for urea during CVV hemofiltration was 0.957 (0.038), CVV hemodiafiltration 0.876 (0.109), and CVV hemodialysis 0.754 (0.123); creatinine 0.942 (0.05), 0.934 (0.056), and 0.814 (0.057); amino acids 0.996 (0.344), 0.904 (0.196), and 0.778 (0.18). For small unbound solutes, there is a decrease in clearance of 6% from CVV hemofiltration to CVV hemodiafiltration and a further decrease of 14% from hemodiafiltration to hemodialysis. The effluent:plasma ratio for vancomycin during CVV hemofiltration was 0.739 (0.082), CVV hemodiafiltration 0.643(0.063), and CVV hemodialysis 0.509 (0.081), corresponding to a decrease of 30% from CVV hemofiltration to CVV hemodialysis. The effluent:plasma ratio for phenytoin was 0.302 (0.028) during CVV hemofiltration and was not significantly different during CVV hemodiafiltration or CVV hemodialysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amino Acids↗
PubMed1994

The outcome of critically ill elderly patients with severe acute renal failure treated by continuous hemodiafiltration.

OBJECTIVES: To study the outcome of critically ill elderly patients with severe acute renal failure managed by continuous hemodiafiltration. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Intensive Care Unit of tertiary institution PATIENTS: Seventy-two consecutive critically ill patients of 65 years or older admitted to the ICU with severe acute renal failure. Seventy similar control patients of age < 65 years. INTERVENTION: Treatment of all patients with continuous hemodiafiltration. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Safety and effectiveness of therapy were assessed. Main outcome measures were duration of oliguria, of ICU stay, and hospital stay for survivors, and survival to ICU discharge and to hospital discharge. Mean APACHE II score on admission was 29.8 (95% confidence interval: 28.5 to 31.1) and mean organ failure score prior to initiation of continuous hemodiafiltration was 3.9 (95% confidence interval: 3.6 to 4.2). Sepsis was present in 51 cases (70.8%) and bacteremia or fungemia in 24 (33.3%). Fifty-three (73.6%) required mechanical ventilation for > 3 days. Vasopressor drugs were used in 65 (90.2%). Continuous hemodiafiltration controlled azotemia in all patients and was only associated with minor complications. Thirty-four patients (47.2%) survived to ICU discharge and 30 (41.6%) to hospital discharge. Among survivors, duration of oliguria was 11.6 days (95% confidence interval: 9.1 to 14.1), mean duration of ICU stay 8.6 days (95% confidence interval: 6.1 to 11.) and mean duration of hospital stay 33.1 days (95% confidence interval: 28.8 to 37.4). No statistically significant difference in survival was found when these patients were compared to a control group of similar but younger patients who also received ICU care and continuous hemodiafiltration for the treatment of severe acute renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: A greater than 40% survival was achieved in critically ill elderly patients with severe acute renal failure by the use of continuous hemodiafiltration. These patients had an in hospital survival comparable to that of younger patients. These findings support an aggressive renal replacement approach in such patients and suggest that continuous hemodiafiltration may be ideally suited to their management.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed2006

Resistance to intercompartmental mass transfer limits beta2-microglobulin removal by post-dilution hemodiafiltration.

Although clearance of beta(2)-microglobulin is greater with hemodiafiltration than with high-flux hemodialysis, beta(2)-microglobulin concentrations after long-term hemodiafiltration are only slightly less than those obtained with high-flux hemodialysis. Resistance to beta(2)-microglobulin transfer between body compartments could explain this observation. beta(2)-Microglobulin kinetics were determined in patients receiving on-line post-dilution hemodiafiltration for 4 h with 18 l of filtration. Plasma beta(2)-microglobulin concentrations were measured during and for 2 h following hemodiafiltration and immediately before the next treatment. The filter clearance of beta(2)-microglobulin was determined from arterial and venous concentrations. The beta(2)-microglobulin generation rate was calculated from the change in the plasma concentration between treatments. The intercompartmental clearance was obtained by fitting the observed concentrations to a two-compartment, variable volume model. The plasma clearance of beta(2)-microglobulin by the filter was 73 +/- 2 ml/min. Plasma beta(2)-microglobulin concentrations decreased by 68 +/- 2% from pre- to post-treatment (27.1 +/- 2.2-8.5 +/- 0.7 mg/l), but rebounded by 32+/-3% over the next 90 min. The generation rate of beta(2)-microglobulin was 0.136 +/- 0.008 mg/min. The model fit yielded an intercompartmental clearance of 82 +/- 7 ml/min and a volume of distribution of 10.2 +/- 0.6 l, corresponding to 14.3 +/- 0.7% of body weight. Hemodiafiltration provides a beta(2)-microglobulin clearance of similar magnitude to the intercompartmental clearance within the body. As a result, intercompartmental mass transfer limits beta(2)-microglobulin removal by hemodiafiltration. This finding suggests that alternative strategies, such as increased treatment times or frequency of treatment, are needed to further reduce plasma beta(2)-microglobulin concentrations.

Adult↗