[On hysterotomy scars in the cervical isthmus wall (A hysterographic study of 479 cases after vaginal hysterotomy)].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors that are associated with the development of scar endometriosis after obstetric hysterotomies. The hypothesis is that early hysterotomy in pregnancy (before 22nd week) is the main risk factor for the development of scar endometriosis. METHODS: The authors conducted a case-control study between April 2000 and June 2003. A total of 117 women were selected, including 39 cases and 78 controls. Exposure and confounding variables were measured by a standardized questionnaire, which included sociodemographic characteristics, reproductive/physiologic history, past pathological history, history of obstetric surgeries, family history, and social history. The odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using bivariate analysis for each possible risk factor. These estimates were obtained by multivariate analysis using unconditional logistic regression. Tests were made to assess the fit of the final model. RESULTS: In the multivariate analysis, positive associations were observed between scar endometriosis and hysterotomy type (early versus late: OR = 42.99; CI 8.77-210.81), amount of the menstrual blood flow (heavy versus light/normal: OR = 11.97; CI 2.35-60.82), and alcoholic consumption (yes versus no: OR = 5.31; CI 1.22-23.11). Negative association was observed between scar endometriosis and parity (OR = 0.61; CI 0.31-1.23), however it was not statistically significant (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Early hysterotomy in pregnancy is the main risk factor for scar endometriosis. Increased menstrual flow and alcohol consumption are also risk factors, while high parity may be a protecting factor.
BACKGROUND: Placental site trophoblastic tumor is an unusual variant of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia that is usually confined to the uterus, although 10% of patients have metastases. Because this tumor occurs in women of reproductive age, preservation of fertility may be relevant. Therefore, local excision of placental site trophoblastic tumor by hysterotomy may have a place in management. CASE: A 25-year-old woman, gravida 1, para 1, presented with irregular bleeding. Uterine curettage revealed intermediate trophoblasts that on immunostaining were positive for hCG and human placental lactogen, consistent with placental site trophoblastic tumor. Endovaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated tumor localized to the anterior fundal myometrium. The patient underwent local excision of the tumor by hysterotomy followed by uterine reconstruction. Pathologic examination confirmed that the surgical margins were free of tumor. The patient has had no recurrence. Two subsequent pregnancies resulted in two spontaneous abortions. A third pregnancy was carried to term. The patient was delivered by cesarean because of the hysterotomy. The hysterotomy scar was intact at cesarean. CONCLUSION: Hysterectomy has been recommended by most authors for treatment for placental site trophoblastic tumor. In some patients with localized placental site trophoblastic tumor who desire preservation of fertility, more conservative surgical therapy may be considered.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether hysterotomy and selective removal of an acardiac twin could improve the outcome of the "pump" twin. STUDY DESIGN: A literature and case review of the outcome of the acardiac twin malformation was performed. When an acardiac malformation was diagnosed at 19 weeks' gestation the patient was monitored with weekly ultrasonographic examinations. At 23 weeks' gestation, no blood flow could be demonstrated to the acardiac twin and it was thought that the continued presence of the acardiac twin posed a risk to the "pump" twin. A midtrimester hysterotomy was performed and the acardiac twin was delivered. RESULTS: After the midtrimester hysterotomy, the pregnancy progressed to term and a healthy female infant was delivered by elective cesarean section at 37 weeks' gestation. CONCLUSION: Midtrimester hysterotomy may be a useful intervention in cases of twinning when one fetus is a threat to the health of the other.
This study was designed to evaluate the haemostatic suture as a means of preventing haemorrhage from the hysterotomy in mares after caesarean section. At 2 university hospitals 1982-1994, 48 mares had caesarean section for dystocia, 10 as an elective, and 8 mares concurrently with colic surgery. The haemostatic suture was used in 31 of 66 mares (47%) and surgery period was significantly (P<0.05) shorter when it was not applied. Anaemia (PCV<30%) was recorded in 13 (22%) of 58 mares, excluding the colic group, and the haemostatic suture did not after this proportion of mares that had anaemia. Anaemia was 5 times more probable following caesarean section than vaginal delivery, evidence that bleeding from the hysterotomy is a serious and common complication of caesarean section in mares. Severe uterine haemorrhage was recorded in 3 mares that had an haemostatic suture (10%) and in 2 mares that did not (6%). The latter two mares died of haemorrhage. The suture, therefore did not eliminate post operative anaemia and severe uterine haemorrhage. If omitted, the hysterotomy should be closed with a full thickness pattern that is sufficiently tight to compress vessels in the uterine wall.
OBJECTIVE: To compare endoscopic coverage of myelomeningocele with a maternal split-thickness skin graft in utero to definitive neurosurgical closure through a hysterotomy. METHODS: Four fetuses with isolated myelomeningocele underwent endoscopic coverage of the defect with a maternal split-thickness skin graft in a CO(2) environment at 22-24 weeks' gestation. Subsequently, 4 fetuses underwent standard neurosurgical closure of their myelomeningoceles at 28-29 weeks' gestation. RESULTS: The mean operating time for the endoscopic procedures was 297 +/- 69 min. Two fetal losses occurred as a result of chorioamnionitis and placental abruption, respectively. A third baby delivered at 28 weeks' gestation after prolonged disruption of the membranes. The 2 survivors required standard closure of the myelomeningocele after delivery. The mean operating time for the hysterotomy procedures was 125 +/- 8 min. No mortality occurred, and all the infants delivered between 33 and 36 weeks with well-healed myelomeningocele scars. At present, the functional levels of all infants approximate the anatomical levels of the lesions. CONCLUSION: With current technology, in utero repair of congenital myelomeningocele through a hysterotomy appears to be technically superior to procedures performed endoscopically.
A series of 100 therapeutic abortions by vaginal hysterotomy is reported. This method of vaginal hysterotomy with a transverse low segment incision just above the internal os of the cervix was first described by Fuchs in 1939. The important advantage of this method is complete avoidance of the uterine cervix. With this method a therapeutic abortion after the tenth week of gestation and in a few cases, up to the 20th week of gestation can be accomplished by a fast one stage technique with few side effects. The method is considered to be superior to the injection methods and the two stage procedures. With skill in vaginal operative techniques, this method can be used in any gynaecological department as a routine method. In this series, 28 cases had concomitant tubal ligations. There were two subsequent pregnancies. Complications were one uterine perforation during the curettage requiring laparotomy and suture. There was one laceration of the trigon of the bladder requiring suture. There were 2 cases of hemorrhage. There were 6 inflammatory reactions in the perimetria of which two required administration of antibiotics. There was superficial thrombophlebitis in one case. And there was a severe coagulation defect in one case of a missed abortion at 5 months gestation.
The management of late gestational trophoblastic disease recurrence is challenging. We present a case of a 16-year-old woman who was diagnosed with a gestational trophoblastic neoplasia 14 months after her hydatidiform mole pregnancy. A staging was performed revealing only an intramural lesion, which resembled a myoma, in the fundus of the uterus. Despite two course of methotrexate, the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) level increased slowly. The presentation was highly suggestive for a placental site trophoblastic tumor. A local resection of the tumor by hysterotomy was performed. Pathologic examination revealed a choriocarcinoma with tumor-free surgical margins. Subsequently, the patient received three cycles of EMA-CO (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine). At present, 89 months after the hysterotomy, the patient is well, with no sings of recurrence. This report illustrates that it is mandatory to have a histologic diagnosis of chemoresistant gestational trophoblastic neoplasia before performing definitive surgery.
BACKGROUND: Angular placentation may be a cause of retained placenta and may require hysterotomy. CASE: A 33-year-old woman with a prior cesarean section underwent an uncomplicated vaginal delivery, had a retained placenta with postpartum hemorrhage and required hysterotomy because the placenta was inaccessible due to its angular location. CONCLUSION: Antepartum ultrasound diagnosis may be possible in some cases of angular placentation.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of the Auto Suture Poly CS-57 disposable surgical stapler to determine if the device offers any advantages over suture closure of the uterus. METHODS: A matched case-control study design was used. Operative time, estimated blood loss, change in hematocrit, incidence of postoperative endometritis, length of stay, and total patient costs were compared. Patients were recruited from a university hospital setting and a private practice. RESULTS: There were 288 patients in the study, 144 in the staple group and 144 matched patients in the standard hysterotomy control group. Patients did not differ in age, parity, gestational age, number of primary or repeat operations, anesthesia, infant weights, or outcomes. Comparing the patients in the staple group and the control group, there was no significant difference in operative time (63.7 +/- 22.9 versus 62.0 +/- 22.3 minutes, staple group versus controls, respectively), estimated blood loss (822 +/- 338 versus 879 +/- 318 mL), change in hematocrit (-5.9 versus -6.5 volume percent), incidence of postoperative endometritis (15 versus 20%), length of stay (4.1 +/-1.3 versus 4.0 +/- 2.2 days), or total cost ($4490 +/- 1544 versus $3997 +/- 1117). Comparing patients operated upon by residents in the university to those operated upon by the private attending physicians, there were no significant differences noted in the above-mentioned variables between stapled and sutured patients. CONCLUSION: Compared with the usual suture technique for cesarean delivery, the uterine stapling device used in this study was not associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of postoperative anemia, infection, length of hospital stay, or cost. This device appears to offer no advantage over traditional hysterotomy and repair.
Despite contraceptive advice, a high proportion of patients who have had a pregnancy terminated by hysterotomy became pregnant again within a short space of time. Fifty-three such pregnancies have been studied, and a substantial risk of rupture of the uterus was demonstrated in 14 cases where the scar was thin. Rupture, impending rupture, or presumptive rupture occurred in three of these cases. Nevertheless successful vaginal delivery occurred in about 80% of cases. The infants so produced were often small for dates. Due weight should be given to the risks of subsequent early pregnancy and uterine rupture before terminating a pregnancy by the operation of hysterotomy without sterilization.
The acardius syndrome is a rare complication of monozygotic twin pregnancies, occurring once in 35,000 births. The outcome is invariably fatal for the acardiac twin and for 50-75% of the normal twins. We present a surgical approach to the treatment of this problem involving hysterotomy and selective delivery of the acardiac twin, which we have used in five cases. In the first case, placental abruption shortly after the procedure led to fetal death. The next two cases resulted in cesarean delivery of the remaining healthy singleton at 35 weeks' gestation. The fourth and fifth cases were delivered at 27 and 28 weeks' gestation, respectively, the first because of preterm rupture of membranes 2 weeks after the procedure and the second because of partial placental abruption 8 weeks after surgery; both of these infants are now doing well. There were no residual maternal complications. We conclude that hysterotomy has direct applicability in the management of these high-risk pregnancies.
Hysterotomy and focal ectomy were performed on 25 patients with malignant trophoblastic tumor during 1979-1991, owing to the patients and their husbands desiring strongly to have reproductive function preserved. Each of the foci of malignant trophoblastic tumor was found to be single nodule with 1-4 cm in diameter and located within the myometrium. The incision of uterus was sutured interuptly with "2-0" catgut. The pregnant rate was 80% among the patients who had received this surgical therapy. The results showed that hysterotomy and focal ectomy were an effective management for some patients without children.
BACKGROUND: Entrapment of the aftercoming head after mentum anterior rotation is a life-threatening complication of vaginal breech delivery. Few options exist when rotation and flexion from this position cannot be performed successfully either transabdominally or with vaginal maneuvers. CASE: A term primigravida presented with a singleton breech in advanced labor. The fetal torso and arms delivered vaginally, but the aftercoming head became extended and was entrapped in a mentum anterior position. The fetal head could not be rotated and flexed, either vaginally or transabdominally with suprapubic pressure. Laparotomy and hysterotomy were performed, and vaginal delivery of a live fetus was accomplished after rotation and flexion of the fetal head through this incision. CONCLUSION: Hysterotomy is a safe and effective maneuver for delivery of the entrapped fetal head with mentum anterior rotation after standard procedures have failed.
Clinicians have debated whether women who request permanent sterilization when they undergo elective abortion should have the two operations done concurrently. Moreover, if the procedures are performed concurrently, the appropriate surgical approach is unknown. To evaluate the latter issue, we identified all concurrent abortion-sterilization deaths in the United States in the period 1972 to 1978 from the Centers for Disease Control's nationwide surveillance of abortion mortality and divided them into two groups: those who had hysterotomy with tubal ligation or hysterectomy (H/H) and those who had curettage or instillation procedures, with tubal ligation by laparoscopy or laparotomy (other procedures). We then used data from the Joint Program for the Study of Abortion (JPSA/CDC) to estimate the number of procedures done in the United States in the period 1972 to 1978 and calculated death-to-case rates for each group. We found that the risk of dying from a concurrent abortion-sterilization procedure was 3.3 times higher if done by H/H. The relative risk for this group was highest during the first 12 weeks of gestation (4.6) and lowest at 13 weeks or later (1.3), regardless of the presence or absence of preexisting medical conditions. Except in the rare instances where the woman has an indication for hysterectomy other than fertility control, the performance of hysterectomy or hysterectomy for concurrent abortion-sterilization, particularly at less than 13 weeks' gestation, does not appear justified.
BACKGROUND: We describe a case of cesarean delivery by posterior hysterotomy in a woman with uterine torsion secondary to a blocked retroverted uterus. CASE: At 28 weeks of gestation this patient's fetus was found to have club feet, initially suspected to be secondary to sacculation of the posterior uterine segment. At cesarean delivery, intraoperative inspection revealed the uterus to be twisted 180 degrees without evidence of posterior sacculation. The uterine incision was performed on the posterior aspect of the lower uterine segment. CONCLUSION: Fixed uterine retroversion with torsion is associated with fetal abnormalities and may require a posterior uterine incision.
A 7-year-old Brahman cow was diagnosed as suffering from chronic foetal mummification of unknown aetiology, concurrent cystic ovarian disease, prolapse of the 2nd cervical ring and chronic cervicitis. Repeated treatment with prostaglandin F2alpha and oestrogen failed to resolve the mummification. A hysterotomy was performed via an incision in the dorsolateral vaginal wall. Good exposure of the uterine horn was achieved and mild post-operative complications were observed. Colpotomy can be regarded as an alternative surgical approach to the moderately enlarged bovine uterus.
We describe 2 cases of uterine compression suture without hysterotomy, only described once in the literature previously (Hayman et al. 2002). We consider in detail the suture material used for this technique and show photos of the compression suture at laparoscopy 4 weeks after insertion to demonstrate why it is inappropriate to use a non-absorbable suture. Modified compression sutures are being used increasingly and a wide variety of suture materials are being chosen, including vicryl, PDS and nylon (verbal communications). We feel it important to report our findings so that others can avoid the use of non or slowly absorbable sutures.