PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “IBDV”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Studies on interferon induction by infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). II. Interferon production in White Leghorn chickens infected with an attenuated or pathogenic isolant of IBDV.

Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) isolants that differed in virulence for chickens, were compared as to: 1) induction of interferon in serum and tissues; and 2) stimulation of IBDV serum antibody. Specific-pathogen-free chickens were infected at one day and four weeks of age by the subcutaneous and intranasal routes of inoculation. The pathogenic isolant induced a more generalized interferon response than the attenuated isolant, independent of age or route of inoculation. Pathogenic IBDV stimulated interferon in serum, kidney, lung, thymus, spleen, and bursa of Fabricius. The attenuated virus induced interferon only in the bursa. The serum interferon response was greater following inoculation with pathogenic IBDV than with the attenuated virus. Serum interferon titers peaked 2-3 1/2 days after inoculation. The pathogenic and attenuated viruses stimulated similar IBDV-neutralizing antibody responses, which occurred after peak serum interferon activity.

Animals↗
PubMed2025

IBDV-SSA, a novel molecular approach for the recovery of infectious bursal disease virus whole genomes from FTA cards.

Infectious bursal disease (IBD), a highly contagious viral disease in young chickens, poses significant economic losses due to high mortality and immunosuppression. While IBD virus (IBDV) virulence is influenced by multiple genes, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of IBDV is crucial for defining the strain pathotype and clinical profile. Flinders Technology Associates (FTA) cards are convenient for field sample collection, but their filter paper matrix can hinder nucleic acid recovery, impacting sequencing efficiency. This study evaluated two enrichment strategies, single primer amplification (SPA) and IBDV segment-specific amplification (SSA), coupled with short-read (Illumina) and long-read (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, ONT) sequencing platforms, to optimize IBDV whole-genome recovery from FTA cards. Illumina sequencing produced comparable raw read counts for both methods, yet IBDV-SSA samples achieved significantly higher genome mapping rates (76%) than IBDV-SPA (12%). Genome coverage analysis revealed that IBDV-SSA provided uniform read distribution across both genomic segments, ensuring complete coverage, while IBDV-SPA exhibited significant bias, with most reads mapping to segment B, and limited coverage of segment A. Importantly, IBDV-SSA also proved compatible with ONT long-read sequencing, providing complete genome coverage. Notably, IBDV-SSA coupled with short-read sequencing successfully characterized coinfections in two samples. This optimized approach using IBDV-SSA enables efficient and comprehensive WGS of IBDV from FTA cards, facilitating strain characterization, virulence prediction, and epidemiological investigations.IMPORTANCEThis research tackles a significant problem for poultry farmers: a virus called infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) that harms young chickens, causing high death rates and economic losses. To fight it effectively, scientists need to analyze its complete genetic makeup. Traditionally, collecting and preserving IBDV field samples was challenging. Flinders Technology Associates (FTA) cards have simplified this process, but getting usable genetic material from them has been difficult. This study introduces a new genome enrichment method, IBDV segment-specific amplification (IBDV-SSA), which successfully allows for IBDV complete genome recovery from FTA cards. By using this improved approach, scientists can accurately identify virus strains, assess how harmful they are, and monitor their spread. This, in turn, helps to improve vaccines and protect flocks. IBDV-SSA is a powerful tool for outbreak surveillance, supporting the poultry industry and ensuring a stable food supply.

Infectious bursal disease virus↗
PubMed2025

Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) as a novel oncolytic virotherapy in glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive form of cancer of the central nervous system. Despite advances in immunotherapies and standard-of-care treatments for GBMs, clinical outcomes remain limited-owing to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and the intrinsic resistance of GBM to conventional approaches. As a result, there is growing interest in rational combination strategies, particularly those pairing oncolytic viruses with immune-based therapies or established treatment modalities. Oncolytic viruses, by displaying conditionally enabled tumor cell-restricted replication, while stimulating antitumor immune responses and leaving healthy tissue unharmed, have the potential to reshape the therapeutic landscape in GBM and aid in achieving more durable benefits for patients. This study investigates the use of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) as a potential virotherapy for GBM. METHODS AND RESULTS: In vitro, IBDV infects and replicates within murine GBM cells and patient-derived GBM stem cells, inducing direct oncolysis and activating proinflammatory gene expression programs. IBDV also enhances the cytolytic activity of temozolomide (TMZ) in treated GBM cells, complementing TMZ chemotherapeutic activity. In vivo, treatment with IBDV in CT-2A GBM-bearing syngeneic mice significantly reduced tumor growth and improved survival compared with control mice. Intratumoral administration of IBDV induces a deep remodeling of the tumor immune microenvironment, reducing immunosuppressive M2-like macrophages and increasing the ratio of CD8+T cells to regulatory T cells. This reversion of immunosuppression linked to monocyte-derived macrophages has been confirmed on experimental ex vivo infections of explants derived from human GBM donors. CONCLUSION: These findings support further consideration of IBDV as a novel virotherapeutic agent for GBM.

Oncolytic Virotherapy↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Response to several avian respiratory viruses as affected by infectious bursal disease virus.

After being inoculated with the infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) at one day of age, specific-pathogen-free chickens were inoculated with either Newcastle disease virus (NDV), infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), or infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV). Their immunity was challenged 2-3 weeks later with homologous virus, and antibody titers were determined for ILTV and IBV. Several studies were made to determine the effects of IBDV on the development of persistent or chronic virus infections. Chickens susceptible to IBDV were exposed to IBDV at one day and inoculated at two weeks of age with either NDV, IBV, or ILTV. Two, three, four, and five weeks postinoculation with the respiratory viruses, tracheal swabbings were collected for virus isolations. The birds were challenged with homologous virus at five weeks postinoculation. The results show that early (1-day) infections with IBDV affect the response of young birds to several avian respiratory viruses, as indicated by lowered resistance to challenge and humoral antibody levels for birds inoculated with ILTV and NDV. Birds infected with IBV and IBDV withstood IBV challenge but were much more prone to persistent infections than were birds not exposed to IBDV. High death rates and decreased weights in all IBDV-inoculated groups demonstrated the damaging effects of early IBDV infection.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Experimental infection of turkeys with infectious bursal disease virus.

Commercial turkey poults 3 to 6 weeks old were infected experimentally by eyedrop with an infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) inoculum obtained from chickens experiencing clinical IBD. The IBDV was passed 6 successive times in poults in an attempt to increase its pathogenicity for turkeys. Regardless of passage level, the IBDV infection in poults was subclinical, with no morbidity, mortality, or gross lesions observed. The bursae of Fabricius from infected poults, however, displayed various degrees of microscopic degeneration and IBDV specific fluorescence at 3, 4, and 5 days postinfection (PI). Infected turkeys also developed low levels of virus-neutralizing antibodies against IBDV at 12 days PI. Uninoculated poults kept in the same unit with infected poults also displayed microscopic changes and IBDV specific fluorescence 7 days after their appearance in inoculated poults. The IBDV was isolated from infected poults only after 5 successive passages of bursal material from infected poults in 9-day-old chick embryos. The IBDV from infected embryos was inoculated into susceptible 3-week-old chickens and 5-week-old poults and produced IBDV fluorescence and microscopic pathology in the bursae of infected poults and clinical IBD in infected chickens.

Animals↗
PubMed1979

Effects of early infectious bursal disease virus infection on immunity to Newcastle disease in adult chickens.

Experimental infection with infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) at hatching or at 3 weeks of age in White Leghorn chickens without maternally derived antibodies to IBDV resulted in a depression in the antibody response of chickens to Newcastle disease vaccination (NDV) at 4 weeks of age and increased the susceptibility of those birds to challenge with virulent NDV. Infection of non-IBDV immune chickens with IBDV at hatching, but not at 3 weeks of age, also depressed the antibody response of chickens vaccinated at 18, 30, or 42 weeks of age, but had no effect on the susceptibility of those birds to challenge with virulent NDV. Prior exposure to IBDV did not alter disease resistance afforded a bird by NDV vaccination at 18, 30, or 42 weeks of age. However, IBDV infection at hatching did render chickens that were not vaccinated against ND more susceptible to challenge with virulent NDV at 21, 33, or 45 weeks of age than unvaccinated birds which were not infected with IBDV or unvaccinated chickens infected with IBDV at 3 weeks of age.

Age Factors↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Response of susceptible versus immune chicks to killed, live-modified, and wild infectious bursal disease virus vaccines.

Modified infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) administered ocularly to either susceptible or passively immune chicks did not induce protection against bursal atrophy by wild IBDV, while intramuscular (IM) or intrabursal (IB) injection protected susceptible chickens. No protection was obtained in passively immune chickens vaccinated IM or IB. Susceptible and passively immune chickens vaccinated with a single dose of killed-virus suspension (KVS) did not become resistant to wild IBDV challenge. A killed-virus multiple emulsion (KVME) induced partial protection (3/5) against challenge 28 days after subcutaneous vaccination of three-day-old susceptible chickens. At 35 and 42 days old, all susceptible chickens were protected by KVME. Protection by passive antibodies was observed in unvaccinated, KVS-, and KVME-vaccinated chickens challenged at 10 and 17 days of age. Protection was only partial in passively immune chickens vaccinated with KVME after passive antibodies were no longer protective to unvaccinated and KVS-vaccinated chicks. Modified IBDV was detected two days post-IB inoculation only in the bursa of Fabricius of susceptible chickens, while wild IBDV was found also in the thymus, spleen, and blood. No evidence of virus was found in immune chickens inoculated IB with modified IBDV. The growth of wild IBDV was limited to the bursa of Fabricius in immune chickens. Furthermore, the intensity of fluorescence, as well as the number of positive bursa cells, was low when compared with fluorescence in the bursa of susceptible chickens infected with wild IBDV.

Animals↗
PubMed1978

Interaction between infectious bursal disease virus and Newcastle disease virus in chickens.

The Australian strain of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV), 002/73, affected the response of chickens to Newcastle disease virus (NDV). The titre of serum antibodies to NDV in chickens infected with IBDV was significantly lower than that of birds infected with NDV alone. It also appeared that IBDV affected NDV excretion from chickens as NDV was more frequently isolated from chickens infected with IBDV, IBDV infection did not alter the pathogenicity of NDV in chickens. This Australian strain of IBDV therefore appeared to be immunodepressive in one-day-old chickens.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

An infectious bursal disease virus outbreak in 14- and 15-week-old chickens.

Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) observed in a flock of 14- and 15-week-old chickens was typical of the acute symptomatic IBDV infections more common in younger birds. High flock morbidity was indicated by a marked decrease in feed consumption, although deaths were not excessive. At necropsy, affected birds had small hemorrhages in thigh muscles, creamy-yellow-colored bursae of Fabricius with prominent longitudinal striations, and swollen mottled kidneys. Histopathologic examination revealed bursal lesions typical of IBDV infection. One of six sera from necropsied birds was positive for antibody to IBDV in the agar-gel precipitin (AGP) test, and one week later all 35 samples tested were positive. Bursae were homogenized and found to contain IBDV as evidenced by precipitation, with antibody to IBDV, in the AGP test.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2026

MARK1 suppresses infectious bursal disease virus replication via phosphorylating VP3.

Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) of the Birnaviridae family is a non-envelope, double-stranded RNA virus that encodes a VP3 protein with multiple functions, which controls viral genome replication, IFN-β production, and virus traffic in infected cells. Posttranslational modifications (PTMs), such as ubiquitination, of VP3 have been demonstrated for affecting its function and stability. To clarify the mechanism by which VP3 is regulated in IBDV infected cells, we focused on the phosphorylation of VP3. Mass spectrometry analysis identified that microtubule-affinity regulating kinases 1 (MARK1) was a kinase interacting protein of VP3. Inhibitory function of MARK1 in affecting viral replication was validated. We describe the phosphorylation event at the serine 130 (S130) and serine 163 (S163) residues of VP3 mediated by MARK1 via mass spectrometry analysis. Alanine replacement of the phosphorylation sites in VP3 significantly enhanced its RNA-binding activity. Additionally, the mutation of two serine residues led to remarkably improved in its polymerase-enhancing function. We then incorporated the two mutations to rescue recombinant IBDV. Viral growth curve analysis revealed that replication of mutant IBDV was significantly enhanced relative to wild type (WT) virus. In conclusion, we found that VP3 functions are specifically regulated by MARK1 mediated phosphorylation at S130 and S163 and that this regulation suppresses IBDV replication ultimately.

Infectious bursal disease virus↗
PubMed1977

Effect of infectious bursal disease on the severity of Eimeria tenella infections in broiler chicks.

A study was initiated to determine whether prior exposure to infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) influenced the susceptibility of young broiler chicks to Eimeria tentella infections. When one-day-old chicks infected with IBDV were subsequently challenged with E. tenella at 7 days of age, they suffered significantly higher mortality and lesion scores than their hatchmates which were not exposed to IBDV. Initial exposure to IBDV also had an effect on the development of E. tenella induced hemorrhaging. Hemorrhaging commenced late on the third day following E. tenella inoculation in chicks infected with both IBDV and E. tenella, while bleeding did not occur in the E. tenella alone group until late on the fourth day post-coccidial challenge. No significant differences in weight gains at 7 or 14 days after E. tenella infection were observed between chicks receiving the double infection and those given only E. tenella.

Animals↗
PubMed1978

Vaccination against infectious bronchitis and the immunosuppressive effects of infectious bursal disease.

An immunosuppressive effect was demonstrated in chickens which were infected with infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) early in life and prior to or shortly after vaccination with infectious bronchitis virus (IBV). This effect was evident by an increased susceptibility to respiratory tract infection with IBV and reduced virus-serum neutralizing antibody levels. Chickens which were hatched from dams susceptible to infectious bursal disease (IBD) were less responsive to IBV immunization attempts, if exposed to IBDV, than were those individuals hatched from IBD immune dams. However, in some cases, chickens from IBD immune dams were also more susceptible to IBV challenge when they had been exposed to IBDV and when compared to birds unexposed to IBDV but vaccinated against IB. An effect of cyclophosphamide on the bursa of Fabricius also had an immunosuppressive action on IBV immunity which was similar to the results from IBDV exposure. The data engendered from these trials may explain the unsatisfactory immunity sometimes observed under field conditions when broilers and replacement pullets are vaccinated at an early age.

Animals↗
PubMed1976

Immunodeficiency in the chicken. IV. An immunological study of infectious bursal disease.

Chickens inoculated orally with infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) 1 day after hatching subsequently showed a 50% incidence of immunodeficiency but little mortality. Antibody responses against IBDV and to immunization with sheep red blood cells (SRBC) or human serum albumin (HSA) were suppressed. Serum IgG concentration was decreased while IgM occurred exclusively in its 7S monomeric form (mIgM). An allotypic marker of chicken IgM (Mla) was lacking in mIgM derived from IBDV-infected birds. The loss of Mla occurred gradually in several birds between 3 and 12 weeks after perinatal infection. Inoculation of IBDV into chickens 3 weeks after hatching resulted in 50% mortality level but little immunodeficiency. Paradoxically, the serum IgG concentration was elevated, in comparison with normal birds. Histology of the bursa showed permanent hypo- or aplasia of follicles irrespective of the age of infection. The results suggest that bursal but not peripheral B cells are targets for IBDV, and immunodeficiency results from impaired peripheral seeding of B cells in infected juvenile chickens.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1977

Effect of infectious bursal disease on the response of chickens to Mycoplasma synoviae, Newcastle disease virus, and infectious bronchitis virus.

At 35 days of age, chickens which as 1-day-old chicks were inoculated with the infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) had significantly lower antibody titers against Mycoplasma synoviae, Newcastle disease virus, and infectious bronchitis virus than did those never inoculated with IBDV. The IBDV also had a marked effect on the development of air-sac lesions. Birds infected with IBDV that were later inoculated with M synoviae (day 14), Newcastle disease virus (days 14 and 28) experienced an increased incidence and greater seversity of airsacculitis than did chicks which were not exposed to IBDV.

Air Sacs↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Growth of infectious bursal disease virus with plaque formation in chick embryo fibroblast cell culture.

The WA69 isolant of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) induced cytopathic effects and plaque formation in chick embryo fibroblast (CEF) cultures after serial passages in embryonated eggs and then in CEF cultures. The plaque-forming agent was cloned (designated WA69 clone) and identified as IBDV on the basis of serologic response in inoculated birds and its antigenic relationship to other known IBDV isolants. The WA69 clone replicated rapidly in CEF cultures, reaching peak titers at 48 hours postinoculation, and the virus caused only minimal histologic lesions of the bursa when inoculated into 3-week-old chicks from a specific-pathogen-free flock. The growth of IBDV in CEF cultures with plaque formation may provide a simple in vitro system for virological and serological studies of IBDV.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Experimental induction of hemorrhagic-aplastic anemia in chickens. I. Etiology.

Exposure to infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) at 1 day old followed by inclusion body hepatitis virus (IBHV) inoculation at 36 days produced typical lesions of hemorrhagic-aplastic anemia syndrome (HAS). The lesions included severe anemia, widespread hemorrhages, and dermatitis. HAS could not be induced in the first 4 weeks of life in chickens inoculated at one day old with IBHV alone or in combination with IBDV. It was concluded that the immunosuppressive effects of IBDV failed to alter the pathogenicity of IBHV in chicks less than 4 weeks old. This resistance was considered to be age-related. Subcutaneous inoculation of day-old chicks with IBDV produced a more severe infection than did oral exposure. Serial passage of IBHV in day-old chicks had no significant effect on the viral pathogenicity.

Adenoviridae Infections↗
PubMed1979

Morphologic changes in the bursa of fabricius of chickens after inoculation with infectious bursal disease virus.

Sequential morphologic changes in the bursa of Fabricius were studied after oral inoculation of 1-day-old chicks with infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). The epithelial surface morphology was studied by scanning electron microscopy, whereas the IBDV replication was sequentially followed by immunofluorescence and transmission electron microscopy. The earliest detectable changes in the bursal epithelium were evident at postinoculation hour (PIH) 48. They were characterized by reduction in numbers and size of microvilli on the epithelial cells accompanied by gradual involution of the button-like bursal follicles. At PIH 96 some specimens showed localized surface erosions due to loss of epithelial cells. As the damage progressed, the infolding of the buttomlike follicles became more pronounced and the surface erosions became more extensive. Loss of surface epithelium exposed the underlying damaged bursal follicles which appeared to be bounded by columnar epithelium. Some follicles had lost almost all the lymphocytes and macrophages and appeared as empty craters. Intrafollicular replication of IBDV was detectable as early as PIH 24 by immunofluorescence technique. Viral replication primarily took place in the lymphoid follicles. Regeneration of the follicles was not seen up to postinoculation day 12, suggesting that the IBDV-induced bursal damage could be permanent.

Animals↗