PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1991

[Effects of urapidil on the cardiovascular response to intratracheal intubation].

The effects of urapidil on the haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation were compared to that of placebo in two groups of 25 patients scheduled for general surgery. Normal saline solution or 0.4 mg.kg-1 urapidil were injected 3 min before induction of anaesthesia with 3 micrograms.kg-1 fentanyl, 0.3 mg.kg-1 etomidate and 0.1 mg.kg-1 vecuronium. Blood pressure (Pasys, Padia, Pa) and heart rate were measured continuously by servoplethysmomanometry before giving the test drug (T0), at the time when the lowest blood pressure was recorded during the three minute period between giving the drug and induction (T1), at the time when the lowest blood pressure was recorded during the three minute period between induction and endotracheal intubation (T2), at the time when the highest blood pressure was recorded immediately after intubation (T3), three minutes after intubation (T4), five minutes after intubation (T5), and at the time when the lowest blood pressure was recorded after surgery had been started (T6). It was planned to give a 25 mg urapidil dose to any patient, from either group, who had a Pasys greater than 200 mmHg for more than 60 sec. Giving urapidil lowered Pasys (T1) by 16%, whilst heart rate increased by 12%. The blood pressure peak due to endotracheal intubation was lower in those patients who had been given urapidil than in the placebo group (T3; p less than 0.05). Six patients in the latter group required the 25 mg urapidil dose, versus 2 in the urapidil group. The preventive effects of urapidil seem to be similar to those obtained with other antihypertensive agents.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1991

[A rare cause of difficult intratracheal intubation: Langenbeck's disease].

A case of difficult tracheal intubation due to insufficient mouth opening once anaesthesia had been induced is described. At the pre-anaesthetic visit, the 47-year-old female patient had painless restricted mouth opening (two fingers' breadth), dental malpositions, and slight lateral mandibular deviation. Cervical spine movements were normal. She was ranked 3 on the Mallampati scale. The anaesthetic technique preserved spontaneous breathing (induction with propofol 1.5 mg.kg-1 and alfentanil 15 micrograms.kg-1). Manual ventilation was impossible. An oral cannula could not be inserted. As intubation by the normal route was impossible, the retromolar approach had to be used. Several attempts were required for successful intubation by this route. At the end of surgery, the patient was extubated without any difficulties. Postoperative investigations revealed hypertrophic coronoid processes. In this condition, the mandible is jammed by hitting the maxilla, especially when mandibular lifting manoeuvres are used to facilitate manual ventilation and tracheal intubation. Clinical and paraclinical predictors of difficult tracheal intubation seem to be unreliable in such dynamic abnormalities of mouth opening.

Female↗
PubMed1991

[Intratracheal intubation using a fiberoptic laryngoscope].

Experience with a new type of laryngoscope (Bullard) is reported. It weighs 1,200 kg, and has fiberoptic fibers both for lighting and viewing. Angle of vision is about 55 degrees. Endotracheal intubation with this device requires a semi-rigid stylet to bend the tracheal tube at 90 degrees just above its cuff, so as to reproduce the curvature of the laryngoscope blade. Intubation is carried out in five steps: 1) introducing the laryngoscope blade, and visualising the vocal cords through its lens; 2) introducing the tube with its stylet, just above the laryngoscope blade; 3) placing the tube between the vocal cords under fiberoptic vision; 4) adjusting tube position in the trachea, the stylet still in place; 5) removing both stylet and laryngoscope. The use of this apparatus in an obese patient with reduced mobility of the cervical spine, who was ranked 4 on the Mallampati scale, is reported. The Bullard laryngoscope enabled easy tracheal intubation (duration 1 min 30 s), whereas direct laryngoscopy and the use of a Huffman prism were unsuccessful. The fiberoptic laryngoscope may be of help in case of difficult intubation.

Female↗
PubMed1996

[Changes in intraocular pressure during anesthesia with intratracheal intubation or laryngeal mask].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA), and the tracheal tube (TT) insertion on intra-ocular pressure (IOP) in eye surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective non-randomized study. PATIENTS: Eighty patients scheduled for eye surgery under general anaesthesia were allocated into either a LMA group (n = 37) or a TT group (n = 43). METHODS: After induction of anaesthesia with propofol, vecuronium and phenoperidine, either a TT or a LMA were inserted. IOP, heart rate (HP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured before (TO) and after induction (T1), after TT or LMA insertion (20 s:T2, 6 min:T3), and before extubation (T4). RESULTS: The HR, MAP and IOP increased significantly at T2 (compared to T1 but not to T0) in the TT group, for a short time, whereas no significant changes occurred in the LMA group. CONCLUSION: LMA insertion does not elicit significant haemodynamic or IOP changes. Conversely, the TT increases HR, MAP and IOP. These changes can be deleterious in case of emergency surgery for perforating eye injuries. The LMA can be recommended as an alternative to TT in eye surgery, provided security rules are followed, because of the risk of displacement of LMA during surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[Intratracheal intubation without muscle relaxant with the use of remifentanil-propofol].

OBJECTIVES: To assess tracheal intubation conditions after induction of anaesthesia with remifentanil and propofol, using itemized scoring criteria. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical, prospective, open, non comparative trial. PATIENTS: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing surgery not requiring muscle relaxation, during the study period extended over 12 months. METHODS: After premedication with lorazepam (2 mg) the day before and hydroxyzine (100 mg) one hour before surgery, anaesthesia was induced with remifentanil administered continuously with a syringe pump at a rate of 1.20 +/- 0.06 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 and propofol (3 mg.kg-1 IV bolus). The trachea was intubated two minutes later and mouth opening, glottis exposure, glottis opening, movements, additional anaesthetic agents and chest rigidity were recorded. RESULTS: Intubation conditions were excellent in 87% of patients, and the tube was inserted rapidly, within two minutes. However in 38% of patients the cuff inflation caused cough. In 13%, glottis opening was delayed and intubation required three minutes. A major decrease of arterial pressure and heart rate was recorded in 9 and 6% of patients respectively. CONCLUSION: Induction of anaesthesia using remifentanil and propofol allows satisfactory tracheal intubation without a muscle relaxant. However this technique is contraindicated: a) in patients with a full stomach, as intubation is not always successful at the first attempt; b) in patients scheduled to undergo neurosurgery or ophthalmic surgery, as tracheal intubation may elicit cough, increasing intra-cranial and intra-ocular pressure; c) in patients in poor circulatory status, as it decreases significantly arterial pressure and heart rate.

Anesthesia, Intravenous↗