SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Ifosfamide”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Randomized phase II evaluation of 6 g/m2 of ifosfamide plus doxorubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) compared with 12 g/m2 of ifosfamide plus doxorubicin and G-CSF in the treatment of poor-prognosis soft tissue sarcoma.

PURPOSE: The relative value of increasing ifosfamide dose in combination chemotherapy for patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin with high-dose (HD) ifosfamide or standard-dose (SD) ifosfamide in patients with STS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with STS were randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and either SD ifosfamide (1.5 g/m(2)/d, days 1 through 4) or HD ifosfamide (3.0 g/m(2), days 1 through 4) every 21 days. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of metastatic disease. End points were overall survival (OS), 1-year disease-free survival (DFS), and toxicity. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 79 patients (52 patients with localized disease and 27 patients with metastases). Both groups were well-balanced with respect to known prognostic factors. There was no significant difference in 1-year DFS comparing SD ifosfamide with HD ifosfamide (55% v 52%; P = .81). For SD ifosfamide, 2- and 3-year OS were 73% and 52% versus 57% and 49% for HD ifosfamide (P = .34). The incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were 49%, 23%, and 10%, respectively, on the SD ifosfamide arm, compared with 88%, 58%, and 63%, respectively, on the HD ifosfamide arm. There were five early deaths, all on the HD ifosfamide arm. CONCLUSION: When combined with doxorubicin, HD ifosfamide did not improve 1-year DFS and OS. Toxicity was clearly greater with the HD ifosfamide arm, and lack of outcome differences might be explained by toxicities with HD ifosfamide. These results suggest that HD ifosfamide combination regimens should not be used as first-line therapy for patients with STS.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Cyclophosphamide versus ifosfamide: to use ifosfamide or not to use, that is the three-dimensional question.

Ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide are alkylating agents that are extensively used in the clinical treatment of cancer. However, the continued use of ifosfamide has been questioned with the suggestion that cyclophosphamide be used exclusively. One response to this proposal is based upon the fact that both cyclophosphamide and isfosfamide are chiral and are administered as racemic (50:50) mixtures of the two isomers. Studies of the clinical pharmacology, metabolism and disposition of these agents indicate that stereochemistry plays a minor role in the efficacy and toxicity of cyclophosphamide but is a major factor in neurotoxicity associated with ifosfamide administration. Studies have demonstrated that the use of a single ifosfamide enantiomer, (R)-ifosfamide would retain the unique antitumor efficacy of this agent, while eliminating the major source of the observed ifosfamide-associated neurotoxicity, (S)-ifosfamide.

Animals↗

PubMed1982

[Ifosfamide versus ifosfamide + CCNU in the treatment of inoperable small cell carcinoma of the lung. A clinical study].

55 selected patients with inoperable small cell carcinoma of the lung have been induced in a randomized prospective trial in order to compare the efficacy of ifosfamide monotherapy with the combination of ifosfamid + CCNU. Initially a control group, treated with symptomatic therapy only, was also included but preliminary analysis revealing that results were unfavourable in comparison to those of the chemotherapy group; this treatment arm was omitted. 53 of 55 patients were evaluable. In group 1 (symptomatic therapy) results were better as to patients' quality of life, but no tumor remissions have been observed and survival times were significantly shorter (15 to 122 days; geometric mean 42.35 days). In group 2 (ifosfamide monotherapy) one total remission (lasting 15 months) and 2 partial remissions (lasting from 3 weeks to 4 months) have been achieved; in this group survival was 3 to 473 days (geometric mean 110.15 days). In group 3 (ifosfamide + CCNU) 7 partial remissions have been observed (3 weeks to 4 months), survival was 17 to 477 days (geometric mean 107.32 days). The combination of ifosfamide with CCNU did not reveal any advantage in comparison to ifosfamide monotherapy.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

Fractionated ifosfamide therapy produces a time-dependent increase in ifosfamide metabolism.

1. Fifteen patients received 1.5 g m-2 of ifosfamide intravenously over 0.5 h every day for 5 days. Twenty-one courses of treatment were studied. Plasma was assayed for ifosfamide by gas liquid chromatography and plasma alkylating activity was measured using the nitrobenzylpyridine (NBP) reaction. 2. A pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a significant decrease in the median (range) elimination half-life of ifosfamide from 7.2 (2.8-14.2) h on day 1 to 4.6 (2.3-7.7) h on day 5 (P less than 0.001, Wilcoxon's test) with a concomitant significant increase in the median (range) clearance from 66 (31-148) ml min-1 on day 1 to 115 (52-381) ml min-1 on day 5 (P less than 0.001). There was no significant change in the volume of distribution on day 5 compared with day 1. 3. There was a highly significant 223% increase in the median (range) plasma nitrobenzylpyridine alkylating activity area under the curve on day 1 from 16 (0.6-105) nmol nor nitrogen mustard equivalents ml-1 h to 52 (13-238) nmol nor nitrogen mustard equivalents ml-1 h on day 5. 4. During five courses of treatment (in five patients in the group) 24 h urine samples were collected on days 1 and 5. The median (range) renal clearance of ifosfamide on day 1 was 6.8 (1.3-16.2) ml min-1 compared with 5.7 (1.3-15.3) ml min-1 on day 5. This difference was not significant. The median (range) metabolic clearance of ifosfamide in these five patients on day 1 was 78.6 (39.9-141.2) ml min-1 and 132.6 (54.6-149.5) ml min-1 on day 5.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Female↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Comparative study of the acute nephrotoxicity from standard dose cisplatin +/- ifosfamide and high-dose chemotherapy with carboplatin and ifosfamide.

The nephrotoxic effects of different platinum compounds based combination chemotherapies were compared. Chemotherapy consisted of either cisplatin fractionated over 5 days (5 x 20 mg/m2) or given as a single-day infusion (1 x 50 mg/m2) plus ifosfamide (4 g/m2) or high-dose chemotherapy was applied including carboplatin (3 x 500 mg/m2) and ifosfamide (3 x 4 g/m2) fractionated over three consecutive days. Conventional parameters such as serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as well as urinary protein excretion of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG)) and alpha 1-micro-globulin were assessed in 52 patients. Fractionation over 5 days without adding other nephrotoxic agents, i.e. ifosfamide, prevented decreases in GFR following cisplatin, whereas the combination of conventional dose cisplatin and ifosfamide, given as a single-day infusion, and high-dose carboplatin/ifosfamide yielded a pronounced fall of GFR. All groups showed increases in the urinary excretion levels of serum derived proteins and NAG, but with significant differences; about 2 to 3-fold for 5-days cisplatin, 3 to 5-fold for single-day cisplatin/ifosfamide, and 20 to 35-fold for high-dose chemotherapy. Thus, conventional approaches can reduce but not prevent the nephrotoxicity of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. In particular, high-dose chemotherapy regimens including carboplatin and ifosfamide are associated with comparable or even higher nephrotoxicity to single-day cisplatin/ifosfamide. In the light of the long-term consequences of persistent renal damage prevention of nephrotoxicity should be further improved.

Acetylglucosaminidase↗

PubMed1997

In vitro studies of the hyperthermic enhancement of activated ifosfamide (4-hydroperoxy-ifosfamide) and glucose isophosphoramide mustard.

PURPOSE: To study the effect of hyperthermia on the cytotoxicity of glucose isophosphoramide mustard (D-19575), a derivative of ifosfamide, which does not require activation and preclinically demonstrates less nephrotoxicity and myelosuppression than ifosfamide. METHODS: In vitro studies (using a crystal violet cell survival assay) of the interaction of hyperthermia with D-19575, as well as the activated form of ifosfamide (4-hydroperoxy-ifosfamide, D-18851), were performed using L929 and OVCAR-3 cell lines held at various temperatures (i.e. 37 degrees C (control), 40.5 degrees C, 41.8 degrees C, 42.5 degrees C, and 43 degrees C) for 65 min. RESULTS: The following thermal enhancement ratios (TER) were demonstrated: D-19575 in L929 1.2, 2.0 and 2.3 at 40.5, 41.8 and 42.5 degrees C, respectively; for D-18851 in L929 1.7 at 41.8 degrees C; for D-19575 in OVCAR-3 2.1, 3.2 and 3.3 at 40.5, 41.8 and 42.5 degrees C, respectively; for D-18851 in OVCAR-3 4.6 at 41.8 degrees C. CONCLUSION: The significant observed increase in cytotoxicity of D-19575 caused by hyperthermia taken together with its known preclinical toxicity profile, encourage its further preclinical and ultimately clinical testing, including its use with whole body and regional hyperthermia.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2004

Prophylactic treatment of known ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy for chemotherapy with high-dose ifosfamide?

We report about a case of advanced Ewing sarcoma in a 30-year-old woman. Initial treatment was started according to the Euro-Ewing 99 protocol. During the initial therapy, an ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy occurred as status epilepticus. Because of cerebral toxicity, the following chemotherapies went without ifosfamide. During final radiotherapy multiple lung metastasis were diagnosed. After two cycles of chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and topotecan (no response), left thoracotomy, and palliative pneumectomy, the patient was transferred to our ward for further treatment. Undergoing two cycles of chemotherapy with ifosfamide 4 g/m(2) intravenously for 3 consecutive days followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) according to the ICE-regimen (ifosfamide 2 g/m(2), carboplatin 200 mg/m(2), and etoposide 2 x 100 mg/m(2) intravenously for 6 consecutive days), and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), complete remission was achieved. Under preventive therapy with methylene blue, thiamin, and glucose 5% infusions, no encephalopathy occurred.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

A prospective randomized phase III study in non-small-cell lung cancer comparing cisplatin, ifosfamide, vinblastine (VIP) versus cisplatin, ifosfamide and etoposide (VIP-16). Hellenic Co-Operative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: It was recently reported that when ifosfamide was added to cisplatin and vinblastine the response rate was increased but not the survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility of increased responses and survival with use of the combination of cisplatin, ifosfamide, etoposide (VIP-16) in comparison to the combination of cisplatin, ifosfamide, vinblastine (VIP) in non-operable NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred twelve patients with histologically confirmed diagnoses of NSCLC were randomized into two groups: group A received cisplatin 100 mg/ m2, vinblastine 6 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 3 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 every 3 weeks; group B received the same regimen except that etoposide 120 mg/m2 was substituted for vinblastine on days 1, 2, and 3. Patients were well balanced for age, sex, performance status (PS), stage, grade, histology and sites of disease, and the relative dose intensity was similar in both groups. RESULTS: One hundred one patients were evaluable for response in group A and 99 in group B. The overall response rates were 29% in group A (5CR) and 25% in group B (3CR). The median time to progression was 7.51 (2-35) months for group A and 7.7(1-28) months for group B (P = 0.34). The median survival was 8.49 (0.33-37.44) months for group A and 9.38 (0.43-36.59) for group B (P = 0.39). Multivariate Cox stepwise analysis showed stage to be the only significant prognostic factor for survival (P = 0.0114). Toxicity was not remarkable and not different between the two groups except for alopecia which was much more common in the patients who received etoposide. CONCLUSION: VIP and VIP-16 combination chemotherapies are equally active in NSCLC with acceptable toxicity. Stage proved to be the most significant prognostic factor for survival in this study.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

The addition of bleomycin and dose-escalated ifosfamide to the combination of cisplatin plus ifosfamide does not improve survival in advanced or recurrent cervical carcinoma.

Twenty patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer were treated with bleomycin 30 U, ifosfamide 5 g/m2, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 (BIP) every 28 days in a phase II trial. The primary purpose of this study was to compare response rate, survival, and toxicity of this regimen with results obtained in a similar group of patients treated with cisplatin 1 mg/kg per week for six courses followed by cisplatin, 20 mg/m2, plus ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2 daily for 3 days every 28 days. Four of 17 evaluable patients (23.5%) treated with BIP demonstrated a response to therapy (complete response 11.7%; partial response 11.7%). The median duration of response was 8.5+ months (range, 6+ to 24 months). These data do not differ significantly (P = 0.76) from a response rate of 27.5% among patients treated with cisplatin plus ifosfamide (PI). A significant (P = 0.003) increase in myelotoxicity was observed among patients treated with BIP versus those treated with PI. The median survival of patients treated with BIP of 13.5+ months (range, 8+ to 24 months) does not differ significantly from the median survival of 9+ months (3 to 26+ months) among patients treated with PI. The addition of bleomycin and dose-escalated ifosfamide did not significantly improve response rate or survival among patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer and resulted in a significant increase in myelotoxicity.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

High-dose ifosfamide: circumvention of resistance to standard-dose ifosfamide in advanced soft tissue sarcomas.

PURPOSE: The study was designed to assess the toxicity and activity of high-dose ifosfamide (HDI) administered by continuous infusion at a dose of 4 g/m2/d over 3 days every 4 weeks in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (ASTS) pretreated with doxorubicin and/or a standard-dose ifosfamide (SDI)-containing regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1991 and November 1993, 40 patients with progressive ASTS were entered onto the study. Twenty-eight patients had been pretreated with a multidrug regimen that contained SDI and were classified as follows: SDI-refractory (n = 21), SDI-resistant (n = 2), and indeterminate SDI-sensitive (n = 5). Patients were treated until progression or major toxicity. RESULTS: One hundred forty-seven cycles of HDI were administered. Neutropenia was dose-limiting, with 100% of patients experiencing grade 3 to 4 toxicity and 12 admissions for febrile neutropenia (30% of patients). Neurotoxicity (17% of patients) was significantly associated with acute renal failure (n = 4) (P < .001), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (P < .01) and febrile neutropenia (P = .048). Chronic renal toxicity (n = 4) was significantly associated with retroperitoneal masses and/or prior nephrectomy (P = .008). Partial responses (PRs) were observed in 12 of 36 assessable patients (33%) and eight patients (22%) experienced disease stabilization. All but one response occurred in patients pretreated with SDI, with five PRs among SDI-refractory patients. Leiomyosarcomas appear resistant to HDI. The median response duration was 8 months (range, 6 to 13+) and the median overall survival time was 12 months. CONCLUSION: The activity of HDI in these pretreated ASTS patients and the apparent circumvention of SDI resistance suggest a real dose-response relationship for ifosfamide and deserve further evaluation. Although toxic, this treatment appears feasible and manageable using routine clinical support. Since prophylaxis of ifosfamide-induced renal damage remains unknown, frequent monitoring of renal and tubular functions during therapy is highly recommended.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comparing paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin with ifosfamide and cisplatin followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: the SNAP01 (Studio Neo-Adjuvante Portio) Italian Collaborative Study.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may represent an alternative to irradiation in locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer. Aims of this study were to compare a three-drug (paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin [TIP]) with a two-drug (ifosfamide and cisplatin [IP]) regimen and to assess the prognostic value of pathologic response on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 219) were randomly assigned to ifosfamide 5 g/m(2) during 24 hours plus cisplatin 75 mg/m(2), or paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) plus ifosfamide 5 g/m(2) during 24 hours and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for three courses. RESULTS: Grades 3 to 4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were more frequent with TIP. We recorded four deaths related to toxicity. The optimal pathologic response (OPT) rate (residual disease < 3 mm stromal invasion) was higher with TIP than with IP (48% v 23%; odds ratio, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.69 to 5.88; P = .0003). At a median follow-up of 43.4 months, 79 women experienced disease progression or died (46 in the IP arm, 33 in the TIP arm). Patients receiving TIP experienced a treatment failure rate 25% less than those receiving IP, but this difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.17; P = .20). Sixty-one patients died (37 in the IP arm, 24 in the TIP arm), and the HR of death was in favor of TIP, although not significantly (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.10; P = .11). In patients assessable for response (n = 189), the average death rates were higher in the group that did not achieve OPT (HR, 5.88; 95% CI, 2.50 to 13.84; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The TIP regimen is associated with a higher response rate than the IP regimen, without a statistically significant effect on overall survival. OPT was a prognostic factor for survival.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine and cisplatin versus ifosfamide+gemcitabine followed by vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine and cisplatin followed by ifosfamide and gemcitabine in stage IIIB-IV non small cell lung carcinoma: a prospective randomized phase III trial of the Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale.

PURPOSE: we carried out a phase III randomized trial to compare vinorelbine-cisplatin regimen to gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen, and to a sequential administration of gemcitabine-ifosfamide followed by vinorelbine-cisplatin or the opposite sequence of vinorelbine-cisplatin followed by ifosfamide-gemcitabine according to the 'worst drug rule' hypothesis in patients with locally advanced unresectable stage IIIB or metastatic stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. The primary endpoint was survival parameters, while secondary endpoints included analysis of response rates and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: patients were randomized to receive: (a) gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 plus ifosfamide 1500 mg/m(2) on days 8-12 with mesna uroprotection (GI regimen) followed by vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 (GI --> VC regimen); (b) the opposite sequence (VC --> GI); (c) vinorelbine plus cisplatin as above described (VC regimen); or (d) gemcitabine 1400 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 8 (GC regimen). All regimens were given every 4 weeks. All patients were chemotherapy naive and had a ECOG PS 0-2. RESULTS: 400 patients were enrolled into the trial. Interim analysis after inclusion of 243 patients showed that ORR were 19% in the GI --> VC arm, 32% in the inverse sequence arm (CV --> GI), 42% in the VC arm, and 30% in the GC arm. The VC arm was statistically superior over the GI --> VC arm (p = 0.0074), but not over the other regimens. Median TTP was 3.1 months in the GI --> VC arm versus 5.0 months in the VC --> GI arm (p = 0.014). For these reasons the GI --> VC and VC --> GI arm were closed since the 'worst drug rule' hypothesis was rejected. Accrual in the VC and GC arms continued up to 140 and 138 patients respectively. Final ORR were 44% for the VC regimen (4 CR), and 34% for the GC regimen (1 CR). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.032). OS was 9.0 and 8.2 months, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. The 1-year survival rate was 24 and 20%, respectively for VC and GC regimens. As expected the incidence of phlebitis was higher in the VC arm, while thrombocytopenia, flu-like syndrome and asthenia were more frequent in the GC arm. CONCLUSIONS: the results of this trial indicate that the combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin and that of gemcitabine and cisplatin are equivalent in terms of median TTP and OS, although the vinorelbine-cisplatin regimen is associated with a higher ORR. Both regimens may be considered as reference treatments for future studies. Moreover, our data reject the 'worst drug rule' hypothesis of sequential treatments in NSCCL at least with the combination used in this study.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1986

Comparative studies on biological activity of /+/R and /-/S enantiomers of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide. II. Antiproliferative activity of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide enantiomers.

The present studies on antiproliferative activity of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide /+/R and /-/S enantiomers followed the earlier described differences in their antitumour activity. P-388 leukemic cells in LCFU (Leukemic Colony Forming Units) assay and Lewis lung cells in experimental metastasis assay were used as models of tumour cells. Bone marrow stem cells were applied as models of normal proliferating cells in NCFU-(Normal Colony Forming Units) and RPNCFU (Rapidly Proliferating Normal Colony Forming Units) tests. In all four models /-/S enantiomers exerted higher antiproliferative effect, than their counterparts. Antiproliferative activity of /+/RS cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide appeared to be exactly intermediate between /+/R and /-/S forms. These data, precisely differentiating the effect of /+/R, /-/S and / +/- /RS forms, confirmed the earlier described, higher antitumour effect of /-/S enantiomers of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Pharmacokinetics of ifosfamide, 2- and 3-dechloroethylifosfamide in plasma and urine of cancer patients treated with a 10-day continuous infusion of ifosfamide.

The cytotoxic drug ifosfamide is subject to an extensive metabolism. This study reports the results of a pharmacokinetic study of the parent drug and the two dechloroethylated metabolites in 22 patients on a 10-day continuous infusion of ifosfamide. Ifosfamide causes a substantial induction of the enzymes responsible for its metabolism, resulting in a two-fold increase of the clearance. The maximal IF concentration is reached after 24 h, after which the concentration decreases to a steady-state. The dechloro-ethylated compounds can be detected in the plasma about 8 h after the start of the infusion with plasma half-lives longer than for IF. Urinary excretion studies revealed that at least a quarter of the IF dose is excreted as inactive compounds.

Adult↗

PubMed1988

Disposition of ifosfamide in patients receiving ifosfamide infusion therapy for the treatment of cervical carcinoma.

The disposition of ifosfamide was investigated in nine patients receiving a total of 23 72-h infusions. There was no linear relationship between steady-state plasma concentrations and either vomiting or CNS toxicity. The steady-state plasma concentrations were reproducible within patients, but there was a wide variation between patients. The progress of the disease did not affect the disposition of ifosfamide.

Female↗

PubMed1993

Comparative pharmacokinetics of ifosfamide, 4-hydroxyifosfamide, chloroacetaldehyde, and 2- and 3-dechloroethylifosfamide in patients on fractionated intravenous ifosfamide therapy.

The initial metabolism of the oxazaphosphorine cytostatic ifosfamide (IF) consists of two different pathways: ring oxidation at carbon-4 forms the cytostatically active metabolite 4-hydroxyifosfamide (4-OH-IF, "activated ifosfamide"), whereas side-chain oxidation with liberation of the presumably neurotoxic compound chloroacetaldehyde (CAA) that may also be responsible for IF-associated nephrotoxicity results in the formation of the cytostatically inactive metabolites 2-dechloroethylifosfamide (2-DCE-IF) and 3-dechloroethylifosfamide (3-DCE-IF). The pharmacokinetics of IF and its metabolites were investigated in 11 patients with bronchogenic carcinoma receiving IF on a 5-day divided-dose schedule (1.5 g/m2 daily). Blood samples were drawn on days 1 and 5 for up to 24 h after the start of the IF infusion. IF, 2-DCE-IF, and 3-DCE-IF were simultaneously quantified by gas chromatography (GC) with an NIP flame-ionization detector (NPFID), CAA was determined by GC with an electron-capture detector (ECD), and the highly unstable compound 4-OH-IF was measured using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay with fluorometric detection of 7-OH-quinoline, which is formed by the condensation of 4-OH-IF-derived acrolein with m-aminophenol. As compared with the values obtained on day 1, on day 5 the terminal half-life and AUC values determined for IF were reduced by 30% (6.36 vs 4.06 h and 1781 vs 1204 nmol h ml-1, respectively), whereas the maximal concentration (Cmax) values were not affected significantly (199.1 vs 181.1 nmol ml-1). This known phenomenon is explained by autoinduction of hepatic IF metabolism and was paralleled by increased metabolite levels. The mean Cmax values determined for 4-OH-IF, CAA, 3-DCE-IF, and 2-DCE-IF (on day 1/on day 5) were 1.51/2.59, 2.69/4.85, 12.9/26.5, and 8.6/16.7 nmol ml-1, respectively. The corresponding AUC values were 11.3/16.5, 30.3/34.3, 146/354, and 111/209 nmol h ml-1, respectively. As calculated by intraindividual comparison, the mean Cmax (day 5): Cmax (day 1) ratios for 4-OH-IF, CAA, 3-DCE-IF, and 2-DCE-IF were 1.94*, 2.05*, 2.52*, and 2.33*, respectively; the corresponding AUC (day 5): AUC (day 1) ratios were 1.51*, 1.29, 2.34*, and 2.23*, respectively (* P < 0.05). These data reveal that during fractionated-dose IF therapy the cancerotoxic effect of the drug increases. If the assumed role of CAA in IF-associated neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity is a dose-dependent phenomenon, the probability of developing these side effects would also increase during prolonged IF application.

Acetaldehyde↗

PubMed2005

Cerebral formation in situ of S-carboxymethylcysteine after ifosfamide administration to mice: a further clue to the mechanism of ifosfamide encephalopathy.

The clinical use of the alkylating oxazaphosphorine ifosfamide is hampered by a potentially severe encephalopathy. S-carboxymethylcysteine (SCMC), a metabolite of ifosfamide (IF), activates the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)/kainate receptor, causes neuronal acidification, and could thus be responsible for the encephalopathy. Since the presence of SCMC in brain has not been documented following administration of IF, SCMC was measured in the brain of mice following both the individual i.p. administration of IF and SCMC. SCMC was found in a concentration of 108.2 +/- 29.7 nmol/g following IF, but was detectable at much lower levels following the administration of SCMC (21.1 +/- 21.2 nmol/g). Together with the observation that the concentration of SCMC was 10-fold higher in liver than in brain 1h after administration of SCMC, these findings suggest that the SCMC found after IF was formed in the brain in situ. The concentration of glutamic acid was similar in IF and SCMC treated animals. Methylene blue, which is used clinically to treat and to prevent IF encephalopathy, did not decrease the formation of SCMC in brain. By inhibiting monoamine oxidase activity it did, however, markedly increase the concentration of serotonin in brain which could modulate the effects of SCMC on AMPA/kainate receptors. Thus, SCMC is present in brain following the administration of IF and could contribute to the IF-associated encephalopathy by activation of AMPA/kainate receptors.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Randomized phase II trial comparing two chemotherapy combinations for non-small cell lung cancer. Mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin versus vindesine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin.

Two chemotherapy regimens for advanced NSCLC given on an outpatient basis were evaluated in a prospective phase II trial: mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (MIP) vs vindesine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VIP). This study included 100 patients. Prognostic factors were well balanced between the arms. Objective response rates (CR: MIP 0%, VIP 4%; PR: MIP 24%, VIP 18%) and survival (median time: 7 months in both arms) were in the standard range usually reported. Subjective and symptomatic improvement have been assessed. Toxicity was moderate, manageable, and mostly reversible. We believe that investigation for new ambulatory schemes must continue.

Adult↗