SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “In re Spring”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Constitutional law--right to refuse medical treatment--decisions to terminate life-prolonging treatment for incompetent patients--In re Spring, No. 2030 (Mass. order of Jan. 14, 1980).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Re-reading Silent Spring.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Medical ethics in the courtroom: the need for scrutiny.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Right to die (second of two parts): a set of fact sheets.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminally ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part II.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Little anthelmintic drenching required for lambs finished over winter and spring on annually re-established irrigated pasture on the Highveld of Gauteng Province, South Africa.
As part of a trial to test the profitability of finishing weaner lambs over winter and spring on the Highveld of Gauteng province, an investigation was carried out over 4 consecutive years as to whether or not worm control was necessary while the lambs were on irrigated, improved pastures. Pastures that had not been grazed by sheep or other livestock for at least 5 years were planted to annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflora) that was ploughed under and replanted annually. Weaner lambs were randomly divided into either 2 (A and B) or 3 (A, B and C) groups and finished from April/May to November/December on a separate pasture per group. While Group A lambs were dewormed before being placed on pasture, those in Groups B and C were not. Faecal egg counts were performed at irregular intervals, and when the lambs were sold at the conclusion of each year's trial, the gastrointestinal tracts of 4-5 lambs per trial group were processed for worm recovery. Haemonchus contortus was the dominant worm species, while Trichostrongylus colubriformis, Ostertagia circumcincta and Trichuris spp. were encountered sporadically. From the results obtained it seems unlikely that there is appreciable 'carry-over' of the various worm species from year to year on pastures that are ploughed and replanted annually; thus it is improbable that there will be a build-up of anthelmintic-resistant worms. While on pasture, no drenching was required for the Group A lambs (dewormed before placing on the pasture), nor in 2 of the 4 years in Groups B or B+C that were not drenched and were lightly infected at the start. In the remaining 2 years Groups B or B+C were drenched once only during the course of each trial. Thus, under the conditions as in this study, little worm control is necessary, provided faecal worm egg counts are done to gauge the levels of infection before the lambs are placed on pasture, and to guard against the possibility of an increase in worm burdens thereafter in some years. Also, because of the apparent lack of carry-over between years, anthelmintic treatment at the time of introduction of the lambs or during the period of finishing should be safe as regards progressive selection for anthelmintic resistance. It is also likely to be cost-effective, considering the low cost of anthelmintics in relation to the price of lambs, to counter the possibility of a loss in production if lambs were to harbour relatively heavy worm burdens when introduced.
Medical decisions for incompetent adults: the Spring case II.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Termination of life support systems in the elderly: Legal issues: the cases of Brother Fox and Earle Spring.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Death, dying, and the courts: the travesty and tragedy of the Earle Spring case.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In Matter of Spring. 21 Dec 1979.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The case of Earle Spring: terminating treatment on the senile.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Vox clamantis in deserto: do you really mean what you say in Spring?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The Spring case and the importance of interdisciplinary dialogue.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In the matter of Earle Spring: some thoughts on one court's approach to senility.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.