PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Infection Control Practitioners”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Results of CHICA-Canada survey of long term care infection control practitioners.

Recognizing the unique and varied needs of infection control practitioners (ICPs) in long term care (LTC) facilities across Canada, CHICA-Canada established a task group to explore this area of practice and to determine the needs that could be met by CHICA-Canada. In March 1992 surveys were sent to CHICA-Canada members practicing in LTC facilities. Surveys were also sent to LTC associations in each province for distribution to their member agencies. A copy of the survey was published in The Canadian Journal of Infection Control in Summer 1992. As of August 31, 1992, 271 surveys have been returned from both members and nonmembers. The findings of the survey depict the special needs, unique practice settings and varied roles of ICPs in LTC facilities.

Canada

Physician and infection control practitioner HIV/AIDS reporting characteristics.

We surveyed a random sample of South Carolina physicians and infection control practitioners about the reporting of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) cases. Of physicians surveyed, 79% indicated that HIV infection as well as AIDS should be reported by name. The following characteristics were associated with those physicians who do not report AIDS cases: not feeling responsible for reporting, not reporting a case perceived to have been reported in another state, believing that information required for reporting is not on the chart, and residing in an urban setting. Targeted education can address these underreporting factors.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

The nonexistent problem.

Effective assessment of problems is essential for the infection control practitioner to function optimally. Today's infection control practitioner not only learns problem solving on the job but is trained in both individual and participatory problem solving techniques. Correct response to a potential problem requires careful investigation and identification of causal relationships. Most literature, however, is directed at solving problems that exist. The phenomenon of nonexistent problems exists when the presented problem is not real but exists only in the perception of the presenter. In some cases, the nonexistent problem may partially represent a real problem, but the relationship may not be readily apparent. Time spent by infection control practitioners responding to nonexistent problems is significant. Without the ability to distinguish between nonexistent and existent problems, needless and ineffective actions may be taken. It is essential that the infection control practitioner understand both the dynamics resulting from the presentation of nonexistent problems and their characteristics.

Hospitals

Study of the definition of nosocomial infections (SDNI). Research Committee of the Association for Practitioners in Infection Control.

If nosocomial infections are to be used as clinical indicators of quality, their definitions must be accurate. To assess validity and reliability of definitions of nosocomial infection, a study was conducted in two groups of U.S. hospitals. Group A consisted of a stratified, random sample of 715 hospitals and excluded those that are part of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. The 112 NNIS hospitals were surveyed separately in group B. Both groups used the same instrument, consisting of 36 case studies simulating patients' charts. Content and construct validity were formally tested and demonstrated. Six case studies were presented for each of the four major NI sites and for community-acquired or no infection. The pooled hospital response was 48% (396/827). The pooled number of individual responders whose data were used in the analysis was 469. Their overall mean score was 84%, and the score for correctly identifying any NI was 83%. Both groups were best at identifying urinary nosocomial infections (Group A = 92%, Group B = 93%) and poorest for no infection (Group A = 62%, Group B = 75%). Group A responders had significantly higher scores if they were certified, had a baccalaureate or higher degree, had taken a formal infection control course, had worked in infection control for greater than or equal to 2 years, or had worked full time in infection control in a greater than or equal to 200-bed hospital that was affiliated with a medical school (all p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.

Impact on knowledge and practice of a multiregional long-term care facility infection control training program.

BACKGROUND: Few affordable training opportunities are specifically designed for the long-term care facility infection control practitioner. There is also little evidence of the success of training in improving infection control practices. The Nebraska Infection Control Network developed a 2-day basic skills training program for Midwestern long-term care facility infection control practitioners that was later disseminated to eastern and western training sites. In this study we examined the effectiveness of the training program in terms of trainee knowledge and practice. METHODS: From 1986 to 1990, a total of 17 courses conducted at the three sites were attended by a total of 266 infection control practitioners. Trainees completed a 40-item multiple choice test before and after training to evaluate their knowledge gain. Implementation of eight key infection control practices and time devoted to infection control duties were measured before training and at 3 and 12 months after training. Implementation of infection control practices was also evaluated in a second study, with infection control practitioners randomly assigned to trained and wait-control conditions. RESULTS: Significant increases after training were found at each site for both knowledge and implementation measures. These increases were maintained at 12 months follow-up. Time devoted to infection control duties increased significantly at the midwest and western sites but not at the eastern site. In the second study, significant differences were found between the trained and the wait-control group in use of infection control practices, providing evidence for a causal relationship between training and increased use of practices. CONCLUSIONS: The training program was effective in producing improvements in knowledge and implementation of recommended infection control practices in long-term care facilities. These improvements were consistent across three diverse geographic areas. There were some specific geographic differences.

California

Consensus paper on the surveillance of surgical wound infections. The Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America; The Association for Practitioners in Infection Control; The Centers for Disease Control; The Surgical Infection Society.

A Surgical Wound Infection (SWI) Task Force was convened by The Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America (SHEA) to evaluate how SWI surveillance should be done and to identify where more information is needed. The Task Force reached consensus in the following areas. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) definitions of SWI should be used for routine surveillance because of their current widespread acceptance and reproducibility. The CDC definitions have been clarified in an accompanying article ("Report From the CDC"). Direct observation of wounds and traditional infection control surveillance techniques are acceptable methods of case finding for hospitalized patients. The optimal method for case finding postdischarge or after outpatient surgery is unknown at this time. SWI rates should be stratified by surgical wound class plus a measure of patient susceptibility to infection, such as the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class, and duration of surgery. Surgeon-specific SWI rates should be calculated and reported to individual surgeons.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a questionnaire survey of 75 long-term care facilities in western New York.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of recognition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as an infection control problem and its prevalence among long-term care facilities, and to evaluate whether certain long-term care facility characteristics such as bed size, ownership, level of infection control activity, and frequency of resident transfers to acute care hospitals are related to the recognition or prevalence of MRSA in this setting. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey. SETTING: Seventy-five long-term care facilities in the 8 counties of western New York. RESULTS: Seventy-five of 81 (92.6%) long-term care facilities returned a completed questionnaire. Seventy-nine percent were considered to have a "limited" level of infection control activity (part-time infection control practitioner who spent less than 10 hours a week on infection control activities). The larger the long-term care facility, the more time was spent on infection control activities (p = .01). Seventy-two percent of the long-term care facilities screened new admissions for MRSA by reviewing culture reports; 69% of the long-term care facilities had a specific infection control policy for MRSA. Sixteen of the 75 (21%) facilities felt they had an infection control problem with MRSA. By univariate analysis, the only characteristic significantly associated with this recognition was use of nurse practitioners or physician assistants by a facility (p < .05). Eighty-one percent of the 75 long-term care facilities had identified one or more patients with MRSA in the year prior to the survey. By univariate analysis, the only characteristics that were significantly associated with the number of residents with MRSA were the monthly average number of residents transferred to acute care facilities (p = .034) and facility bed size (p = .022); there was also a trend toward increasing intensity of infection control activities (p = .085). However, facility bed size and the average number of resident transfers per month to acute care facilities were strongly associated (p = .0002). By stepwise logistic regression analysis, only bed size was an independent predictor of the number of residents with MRSA. Many long-term care facilities had tried to eradicate MRSA; ciprofloxacin was most commonly used to eradicate MRSA. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of the 75 long-term care facilities in the 8 counties of western New York have identified patients with MRSA, although only a minority (21%) of them actually believed that an infection control problem existed. Facility size (a surrogate for the monthly average number of resident transfers to acute care facilities) seems to be an important factor in determining the number of residents with MRSA in long-term care facilities in our geographic region. The major longitudinal studies of MRSA in such facilities have so far been done only in Veterans Affairs facilities. Further studies are needed in freestanding long-term care facilities, the largest group of long-term care facilities in the United States, to determine the epidemiology of MRSA in this setting and to develop practical and valid infection control methods for residents with MRSA.

Health Facility Size

A hospital-based education programme for infection control in Australia.

Fremantle Hospital, a 400-bed teaching hospital has offered an infection control course for registered nurses since 1984. The number of nurses practising infection control in the state of Western Australia has increased from seven in 1984 to over 100. Country areas now have access to appropriate advice. The course is hospital-based and multidisciplinary and is constantly evolving. It lasts for two weeks, is economic and wastage is low due to careful selection of candidates. Basic infection control standards have improved, but teaching of medical and allied health staff and line managers has not yet been addressed. Nurses from overseas are now applying for the course and a regional network of infection control practitioners is a major aim.

Curriculum

Patient-care directives and infection control: the potential conflict of interest during epidemics in long-term care facilities.

Patient-care directives in long-term care facilities ensure that the aggressiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions accurately reflects the desires of the patient. The results of our investigation of two outbreaks of fatal respiratory illness in long-term care facilities illustrate how patient-care directives may have delayed response to the outbreaks. Despite a cluster of deaths in each facility, staff delayed collection of laboratory specimens until patients with no directives restricting the medical workup became ill. Directives focus on the needs of the individual patient and family, but when an outbreak occurs, they may conflict with community needs. The challenge for the infection control practitioner is to recognize when community needs outweigh individual desires so that appropriate laboratory investigations can identify the cause of the illness.

Advance Directives

Education programmes for infection control in Canada.

Formal educational programmes for infection control personnel in Canada are limited and most courses have been directed at infection control practitioners (ICPs). Most ICPs report that their preparation comes from in-post training. Although there have been several short, non-credit courses available in the past, the only course available for ICPs at the present time is an intensive 1-week course. Surveys of nurses and ICPs suggest that they prefer flexibly scheduled university credit courses which will not only prepare them for their positions but also enable them to meet entry-to-practice requirements as recommended by the board of the Canadian Nurses Association. The future development of courses for ICPs must endeavour to meet these needs. Moreover, the educational needs of physicians and other health professionals working in this field have not been well identified or addressed and it is clear that educational programmes must also be developed for these health professionals.

Canada

Computerized identification of patients at high risk for hospital-acquired infection.

Surveillance for hospital-acquired infections is required in U.S. hospitals, and statistical methods have been used to predict the risk of infection. We used the HELP (Health Evaluation through Logical Processing) Hospital Information System at LDS Hospital to develop computerized methods to identify and verify hospital-acquired infections. The criteria for hospital-acquired infection are standardized and based on the guidelines of the Study of the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control and the Centers for Disease Control. The computer algorithms are automatically activated when key items of information, such as microbiology results, are reported. Computer surveillance identified more hospital-acquired infections than did traditional methods and has replaced manual surveillance in our 520-bed hospital. Data on verified hospital-acquired infections are electronically transferred to a microcomputer to facilitate outbreak investigation and the generation of reports on infection rates. Recently, we used the HELP system to employ statistical methods to automatically identify high-risk patients. Patient data from more than 6000 patients were used to develop a high-risk equation. Stepwise logistic regression identified 10 risk factors for nosocomial infection. The HELP system now uses this logistic-regression equation to monitor and determine the risk status for all hospitalized patients each day. The computer notifies infection control practitioners each morning of patients who are newly classified as being at high risk. Of 605 hospital-acquired infections during a 6-month period, 472 (78%) occurred in high-risk patients, and 380 (63%) were predicted before the onset of infection. Computerized regression equations to identify patients at risk of having hospital-acquired infections can help focus prevention efforts.

Cross Infection

A survey of hospital infection control policies and employee measles cases during Los Angeles County's measles epidemic, 1987 to 1989.

BACKGROUND: Between December 1987 and December 1989, 74 adults employed in Los Angeles County acute care hospitals were found to have measles. To investigate measles infection control policies in Los Angeles County and to gain information on employee measles cases, two surveys were performed. METHODS: A survey of all infection control practitioners (N = 102) of acute care hospitals was conducted in July 1989. Reported employee measles cases were surveyed after initial case reports were reviewed. RESULTS: The survey of acute care hospitals revealed that only 17% had mandatory measles infection control policies requiring written proof of past measles vaccination, disease, or seropositivity. Only 4% of hospitals had policies affecting students or volunteers. A second survey of hospital employees with confirmed measles revealed that 46% (34/74) were working in hospitals without measles infection control policies, 43% (32/74) were born before 1957, and 31% (21/67) were working in jobs not traditionally considered to provide a high risk of measles exposure. One third of the sick employees were hospitalized. The standard of either birth date before 1957 or oral history of measles illness or vaccination would have classified 93% (39/42) of the employees with measles as immune. CONCLUSIONS: Effective infection control policies against measles and rubella should be adopted and enforced. Those policies should only allow written documentation as proof of measles immunity and should address all employees, regardless of age or job description.

Adult