PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Randomized, pilot study of intermittent pneumatic compression devices plus dalteparin versus intermittent pneumatic compression devices plus heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing craniotomy.

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin and the low molecular weight heparin, dalteparin, are used for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing craniotomy. These drugs were compared in a randomized, prospective pilot study comparing intermittent pneumatic compression devices plus dalteparin to intermittent pneumatic compression devices plus heparin. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing craniotomy were randomly allocated to receive perioperative prophylaxis with subcutaneous (SC heparin, 5000 units every 12 hours, or dalteparin, 2,500 units once a day, begun at induction of anesthesia and continued for 7 days or until the patient was ambulating. Entry criteria were age over 18 years, no deep vein thrombosis (DVT) preoperatively as judged by lower limb duplex ultrasound and no clinical evidence of pulmonary embolism preoperatively. Patients with hypersensitivity to heparin, penetrating head injury or who refused informed consent were excluded. Patients underwent a duplex study 1 week after surgery and 1 month clinical follow-up. All patients were treated with lower limb intermittent pneumatic compression devices. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in age, gender, and risk factors for venous thromboembolism. There were no differences between groups in intraoperative blood loss, transfusion requirements or postoperative platelet counts. Two patients receiving dalteparin developed DVT (one symptomatic and one asymptomatic). No patient treated with heparin developed DVT and no patient in either group developed pulmonary embolism. There were two hemorrhages that did not require repeat craniotomy in patients receiving dalteparin and one that did require surgical evacuation in a patient treated with heparin. Drug was stopped in two patients treated with dalteparin because of thrombocytopenia. None of these differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in postoperative hemorrhage, venous thromboembolism or thrombocytopenia between heparin and dalteparin. The results suggest that, given the small sample size of this trial, both drugs appear to be safe and the incidence of venous thromboembolism by postoperative screening duplex ultrasound appears to be low when these agents are used in combination with intermittent pneumatic compression devices.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Changes in femoral vein blood flow velocity by intermittent pneumatic compression: calf compression device versus plantar-calf sequential compression device.

Intermittent pneumatic compression has become widely used to prevent deep venous thrombosis potentially causing fatal pulmonary embolism. Although uniform compression has been commonly applied, a new method of sequential compression from plantar to calf has recently been developed. In this report, changes in maximum blood flow velocity in the femoral vein were compared with compression of only the calf uniformly and compression from plantar to calf sequentially in 10 healthy adult volunteers. A compression pressure of 60 mm Hg was applied for 5 min, and the velocity was measured before and after this treatment by ultrasound echography. There was no statistically significant difference in the change in maximum velocity between calf compression and plantar-calf sequential compression. The maximum velocity increased significantly with both compressions. However, plantar-calf sequential compression tended to have a greater effect. Although the results did not demonstrate an advantage of plantar-calf sequential compression compared with calf compression only, if the former compression is applied for a long time, it may have a greater effect.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

The effect of intermittent pneumatic compression devices on intraoperative blood loss during radical prostatectomy and radical cystectomy.

Intermittent pneumatic compression devices are a widely used, effective and presumed risk-free method of deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, presumably by increasing peak venous blood velocity, and stimulating local and systemic fibrinolysis. We investigated whether intermittent pneumatic compression devices had any effect on intraoperative blood loss or transfusion during radical pelvic urological surgery. To our knowledge no previous study has addressed these issues. Records were reviewed for patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy or radical cystectomy with diversion from 1985 to 1990. A total of 91 cases was reviewed: 38 radical retropubic prostatectomies and 53 radical cystectomies with diversion (34 male and 19 female patients). There were 59 patients with intermittent pneumatic compression devices (29 radical retropubic prostatectomies and 30 radical cystectomies with diversion) and 32 without intermittent pneumatic compression devices (9 radical retropubic prostatectomies and 23 radical cystectomies with diversion). Intraoperative blood loss and transfusions were calculated for each group with and without intermittent pneumatic compression devices. No clinically apparent lower extremity deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolus was diagnosed in any patient. For the group with intermittent pneumatic compression devices mean intraoperative blood loss was 2,541 ml. (range 700 to 8,850) versus 1,807 ml. (range 450 to 5,100) without a device, for a statistically significant difference of 734 ml. (p = 0.005). When 5 patients with excessive intraoperative blood loss (more than 5,000 ml.) were excluded the statistically significant difference was maintained. When comparing radical retropubic prostatectomy and radical cystectomy with diversion, with and without intermittent pneumatic compression devices, blood loss was greater for the group with a device for each procedure. Differences in intraoperative blood loss were independent of sex or tumor stage. Intraoperative transfusions were increased by approximately 0.6 units per patient with the device. Our study suggests that intermittent pneumatic compression devices may increase blood loss during a radical pelvic operation.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗
PubMed1994

Use of the intermittent pneumatic compression device in venous ulcer disease.

The intermittent pneumatic compression device is a relatively new treatment for patients with venous ulcers. With the advent of this therapy being used by the patient in the home setting, the nurse is the primary point of contact for patient questions, concerns, and patient education. Nurses need to know the optimal compression pressure, inflation time, and sequencing time cycles to advise patients in the proper use of this therapy and how to screen patients for its safe use. The major contraindication for this therapy is the presence of deep venous thrombi. A review of the literature is presented, concluding with a recommended scientific basis for optimal compression pressure, inflation time, and sequencing time cycle pattern for the intermittent pneumatic sequential compression device in the venous ulcer patient population. Patient education strategies and topics are discussed.

Bandages↗
PubMed2000

Optimising the performance of intermittent pneumatic compression devices.

OBJECTIVES: this study was designed to determine whether an intermittent pneumatic compression device (IPC) with an increased maximal inflation pressure, a decreased time to maximal pressure and a longer duration of compression would improve venous return compared to a standard IPC device. METHODS: thirty limbs in 15 volunteers without evidence of venous disease were studied using duplex scanning at rest and during the application of two different IPC devices with different compression parameters. The first device IPC-1 (SCD 5325, Kendall) has a six-chambered cuff applying 45 mmHg after 12 s, sequentially from ankle to thigh followed by 60 s of non-compression. The second device IPC-2 (Vena-Assist(R), ACI Medical) has a foot, ankle and calf cuff, applies a pressure of 80 mmHg, has a pressure rise time of 0.3 s, maintains inflation for 5.5 s, and has a cycling time of 1 min. Peak venous velocity and acceleration time were measured at rest and during the IPC application. Measurements were obtained in supine position from the common femoral vein 1 cm above the saphenofemoral junction to include the entire venous outflow from the limb. RESULTS: peak venous velocity at rest was significantly higher in the right limb than in the left limb (26+/-7.2 vs. 22+/-5.7 cm/s, p<0.01). Peak venous velocity was significantly increased by both IPC devices (p <0.0001). IPC-2 achieved significantly higher peak venous velocity than IPC-1 (55.1+/-17.8 vs. 37.4+/-6.9 cm/s, p<0.0001). Acceleration time was also found to be significantly shorter (370+/-93.4 vs. 560+/-83.5 ms, p<0.0001) in IPC-2 than in IPC-1, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: we have demonstrated that progressive inflation at the foot, ankle and calf, increasing maximal inflation pressure and decreasing time to maximal pressure result in increased venous return. These changes may improve the efficacy of IPC devices in the prevention of deep-venous thrombosis (DVT) formation.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

A miniature and mobile intermittent pneumatic compression device for the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after joint replacement.

The WizAir-DVT is a miniature, lightweight (690 g), battery-operated and mobile intermittent pneumatic compression device (ICD), which enables continuous intraoperative use and immediate patient mobilization postoperatively. We compared its efficacy with a commonly used ICD, the Kendall SCD. Peak femoral vein flow velocity was measured in 20 apparently healthy volunteers at rest and with each device: we found no significant differences between them. A second prospective, randomized, clinical trial was used to compare the efficiency of the device in preventing deep venous thrombosis (DVT) after joint replacement in 50 patients (n=25/group). None developed DVT. Doppler ultrasonography revealed no significant differences. The WizAir-DVT antithrombotic compression device is as safe and effective as the Kendall SCD.

Arthroplasty, Replacement↗
PubMed2005

[A case of deep vein thrombosis in spite of using an intermittent pneumatic compression device].

A 69-year-old male patient underwent subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer under sevoflurane anesthesia combined with epidural analgesia. According to the protocol for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in our hospital, only an intermittent pneumatic compression device (IPC) and elastic stockings were perioperatively used for prophylaxis of DVT although D-dimer level was slightly increased to 1.2 microg x ml(-1). On the 2nd post-operative day, a venous ultrasound examination was performed, because D-dimer level was suddenly increased up to 41.5 microg x ml(-1) without any signs of thrombus in the atrium and pleural cavity. Since DVT was detected with the right lower limb, the use of an IPC was stopped and an inferior vena cava filter was inserted through the right jugular vein with a continuous administration of heparin. An aggressive search should be performed if DVT is suspected by any clinical signs including an increase in D-dimer level. We should also keep in mind the possibility of DVT even if an IPC and elastic stockings are perioperatively used.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after head and spinal trauma: intermittent pneumatic compression devices versus low molecular weight heparin.

Although there are alternative methods and drugs for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE), it is not clear which modality is most suitable and efficacious for patients with severe (stable or unstable) head/spinal injures. The aim of this study was to compare intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPC) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for preventing VTE. We prospectively randomized 120 head/spinal traumatized patients for comparison of IPC with LMWH as a prophylaxis modality against VTE. Venous duplex color-flow Doppler sonography of the lower extremities was performed each week of hospitalization and 1 week after discharge. When there was a suspicion of pulmonary embolism (PE), patients were evaluated with spiral computed tomography. Patients were analyzed for demographic features, injury severity scores, associated injuries, type of head/spinal trauma, complications, transfusion, and incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and PE. Two patients (3.33%) from the IPC group and 4 patients (6.66%) from the LMWH group died, with their deaths due to PE. Nine other patients also succumbed, unrelated to PE. DVT developed in 4 patients (6.66%) in the IPC group and in 3 patients (5%) in the LMWH group. There was no statistically significant difference regarding a reduction in DVT, PE, or mortality between groups ( p = 0.04, p > 0.05, p > 0.05, respectively). IPC can be used safely for prophylaxis of VTE in head/spinal trauma patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

A combination of heparin and an intermittent pneumatic compression device may be more effective to prevent deep-vein thrombosis in the lower extremities after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of a combination of heparin and an intermittent pneumatic compression device on thrombogenesis and platelet activation in the upper and lower extremities after laparoscopy. METHODS: A blinded study was performed on 30 patients. Patients were randomly injected with either heparin or physiological saline solution (PSS) subcutaneously. The intermittent compression boot was used during surgery. Plasma D-dimer (D-D), a marker of thrombogenesis, and b-thromboglobulin (b-TG), a marker of platelet activation, were measured in the upper and lower extremities. RESULTS: In the heparin group, D-Ds in the upper and lower extremities increased significantly 24 h after surgery, but they were significantly lower than those of the PSS group. b-TG in the lower extremities of patients in the PSS group increased significantly 24 h after surgery. CONCLUSION: A combination of low-molecular-weight heparin and intermittent pneumatic compression may be more effective to prevent deep-vein thrombosis in the legs.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Effect of calf-thigh intermittent pneumatic compression device after total hip arthroplasty: comparative analysis with plantar compression on the effectiveness of reducing thrombogenesis and leg swelling.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two intermittent pneumatic compression devices as prophylaxis against intravascular coagulation and leg swelling following total hip arthroplasty. We studied 121 patients by assessing thrombogenesis using the D-dimer level before and after total hip arthroplasty. In addition, the patients' postoperative swelling was evaluated by measuring the thigh and lower leg circumference. Altogether, 58 patients were assigned to the calf-thigh pneumatic compression group, and the other 63 were assigned to the plantar compression group; the two pneumatic compression devices were compared to evaluate which was more effective for reducing thrombogenesis. At 7 days postoperatively, the mean D-dimer levels of the calf-thigh compression group and the plantar compression group were 8.86 and 9.26 microg/ml, respectively. There was no significant difference ( P = 0.697) between the two groups. However, the increased ratio of the circumference of the thigh, which was compared after arthroplasty, averaged 1.22% in the calf-thigh compression group and 3.19% in the plantar compression group, which was significantly different ( P << 0.01). Calf-thigh pneumatic compression was found to be more effective than plantar compression for reducing thigh swelling during the early postoperative stage.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Meta-analysis of effectiveness of intermittent pneumatic compression devices with a comparison of thigh-high to knee-high sleeves.

This meta-analysis used all original articles from 1966 to June 1996 that fit the preset inclusion criteria to examine the clinical effectiveness of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) devices in preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism and to compare the results of knee-high sleeves to thigh-high sleeves. IPC devices decreased the relative risk of DVT by 62 per cent when compared with placebo, 47 per cent compared with graduated compression stockings, and 48 per cent compared with mini-dose heparin. IPC devices significantly decreased the relative risk of DVT compared with placebo in high-risk patients such as neurosurgery and major orthopedic surgery patients and in modest risk patients such as general surgery patients. In major orthopedic surgery patients, the incidence of DVT was similar for IPC- and warfarin-treated patients; however, IPC was significantly better than warfarin at decreasing the incidence of calf only DVT, whereas warfarin seemed to be better at decreasing proximal DVT. IPC devices are effective in decreasing the incidence of DVT in patients at moderate to high risk and are probably more efficacious than graduated compression stockings or mini-dose heparin; however, IPC devices are not protective against pulmonary embolism. The data directly comparing the various methods of compression (knee-high versus thigh-high sleeves and graded-sequential versus uniform compression) are sparse and conflicting.

Bandages↗
PubMed2003

Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in trauma: improved compliance with a novel miniaturized pneumatic compression device.

OBJECTIVE: Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) devices prevent lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT) when used properly, but compliance remains an issue. Devices are frequently discontinued when patients are out of bed, and they are rarely used in emergency departments. Trauma patients are at high risk for LEDVT; however, IPCs are underused in this population because of compliance limitations. The hypothesis of this study was that a new miniaturized, portable, battery-powered pneumatic compression device improves compliance in trauma patients over that provided by a standard device. METHODS: This was a prospective trial in which trauma patients (mean age, 46 years; revised trauma score, 11.7) were randomized to DVT prophylaxis with a standard calf-length sequential IPC device (SCD group) or a miniaturized sequential device (continuous enhanced-circulation therapy [CECT] group). The CECT device can be battery-operated for up to 6 hours and worn during ambulation. Timers attached to the devices, which recorded the time each device was applied to the legs and functioning, were used to quantify compliance. For each subject in each location during hospitalization, compliance rates were determined by dividing the number of minutes the device was functioning by the total minutes in that location. Compliance rates for all subjects were averaged in each location: emergency department, operating room, intensive care unit, and nursing ward. RESULTS: Total compliance rate in the CECT group was significantly higher than in the SCD group (77.7% vs. 58.9%, P =.004). Compliance in the emergency department and nursing ward were also significantly greater with the CECT device (P =.002 and P =.008 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies have demonstrated that reduced compliance with IPC devices results in a higher incidence of LEDVT. Given its ability to improve compliance, the CECT may provide superior DVT prevention compared with that provided by standard devices.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Intermittent pneumatic compression devices -- physiological mechanisms of action.

There are many reports of how IPC is used effectively in the clinical setting; including the prevention of deep venous thrombosis, improvement of circulation in patients with lower extremity arterial diseases, reduction of lymphoedema, and the healing of venous ulcers. However, despite the widely accepted use of IPC, it is still unclear how IPC actually exerts its beneficial effects. The exact physiological mechanisms of action are unknown. The clinical utility of IPC and the putative mechanisms by which IPC could exert its therapeutic effect will be reviewed. The paper will examine the mechanical effects of IPC exerted on the lower extremity, and the subsequent biochemical changes in the circulation. In vitro studies of the effects of mechanical stress such as compressive strain and shear on cultured endothelial cells, and their clinical relevance to IPC will also be reviewed.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty.

We performed a meta-analysis of the English literature to assess the efficacy of four common regimes for thromboembolic prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty: aspirin, warfarin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and pneumatic compression. We reviewed 136 articles and abstracts published between January 1980 and December 1997. Papers not using routine venography and a lung scan or angiography to detect deep-venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary emboli (PE) respectively, were excluded. Of the 136 studies, 23 with 6,001 patients were selected. The incidence of DVT was 53% (1,701/3,214) in the aspirin group, 45% (541/1,203) in the warfarin group, 29% (311/1,075) in the LMWH group, and 17% (86/509) in the pneumatic compression device group. Intermittent pneumatic compression devices and LMWH were significantly better than warfarin (p < 0.0001) or aspirin (p < 0.0001) in preventing DVT. The incidence of asymptomatic PE was 11.7% in the aspirin group (222/1,901), 8.2% (101/1,229) in the warfarin group and 6.3% (24/378) in the pneumatic compression group. No studies with LMWH used routine lung scans. Warfarin and pneumatic compression were significantly better than aspirin in preventing asymptomatic PE (p < 0.05). The incidence of symptomatic PE was 1.3% (23/1,800) in the aspirin group, 0.4% (2/559) in the warfarin group, 0.5% (2/416) in the LMWH group and 0% (0/177) in the pneumatic compression group. No statistically significant difference was noted between the above prophylactic regimes due to the very small incidence of symptomatic PE. Prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease in TKA may have to include a combination of some of the above regimes to incorporate their advantages.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2001

Evaluation of intermittent pneumatic compression devices.

Venous blood flow rate in the lower extremity after applying different pneumatic compression devices was evaluated. Five healthy individuals, aged 21-35, were recruited for this study. The ability of six different pneumatic compression devices to increase femoral venous blood flow velocity was analyzed and compared to that of active and passive foot dorsiflexion. Baseline venous blood flow velocity was measured using an ATL Duplex Doppler before leg compression. Venous blood flow velocity was then monitored before, during, and after each compression cycle. Average peak venous velocity increased >200% on dorsiflexion of the ankle. Among the investigated devices, the increase in venous velocity varied significantly. Design of compression chambers enabling compression on the lateral and medial aspects of the calf produced an increase in venous velocity closest to active foot dorsiflexion. Foot compression devices produced the smallest increase in venous velocity. The relative effectiveness of pneumatic compression devices, particularly with respect to increasing venous blood flow in the lower extremity, may correlate well with how closely the device simulates the physiologic contraction of the calf muscles. Clinical trials are needed to further compare the effectiveness of these devices, as other less readily measured factors play a role in thromboprophylaxis.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Central and peripheral adverse hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic surgery and their reversal with a novel intermittent sequential pneumatic compression device.

OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of a novel intermittent sequential pneumatic compression device (Lympha-press) on the adverse cardiac and peripheral hemodynamic changes induced by positive-pressure pneumoperitoneum (PPPn) in laparoscopic surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Creation of PPPn is known to cause adverse central and peripheral hemodynamic changes. An intrasubject observational study was undertaken to quantitate these adverse changes and to assess the influence of an intermittent sequential pneumatic compression system on these adverse hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic surgery with PPPn. METHODS: The study involved 16 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery with PPPn of 12 mmHg and 30 degrees head-up tilt position. The following peripheral hemodynamic recordings were made using Doppler ultrasound: peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), and cross-sectional area of the femoral vein. Central monitoring included cardiac output and stroke volume by transesophageal Doppler, blood pressure, and pulse. The hemodynamic state based on these parameters was assessed before induction of PPPn with the anesthetized patient in the supine position, after induction of PPPn and head-up tilt position with Lympha-press off, and during PPPn and head-up tilt position with Lympha-press on, and after desufflation with the patient in the supine position under general anesthesia. RESULTS: Positive-pressure pneumoperitoneum and the head-up tilt position resulted in a 33% reduction in PSV, a 21% reduction in EDV, and a 29% increase in cross-sectional area of the femoral vein. This was associated with a 20% reduction in cardiac output and an 18% reduction in stroke volume. Activation of Lympha-press during PPPn and the head-up tilt position resulted in a 129% increase in PSV and a 55% increase in EDV by 55%. It also increased the cardiac output by 27% and stroke volume by 16%, with no effect on cross-sectional area. Compared with the pre-PPPn stage, there was no difference in cardiac output or stroke volume, but the PSV was higher by 78% and the EDV by 32%. After abdominal desufflation in the supine position, the cardiac output and stroke volume were restored to the pre-PPPn level, but persistent and significant elevations were observed during the period of study in PSV, EDV, and cross-sectional area. CONCLUSIONS: Significant and individually variable central and peripheral hemodynamic changes are encountered during laparoscopic surgery with PPPn and the head-up tilt position. These are reversed by intermittent sequential pneumatic compression using Lympha-press.

Adult↗