SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “International Normalized Ratio”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1998

Comparison of a portable capillary whole blood coagulation monitor and standard laboratory methods for determining international normalized ratio.

The international normalized ratio (INR) is the current standard for monitoring anticoagulation therapy. Although simple to determine, it normally requires venipuncture and extensive laboratory resources for specimen handling and analysis. The portable capillary whole blood coagulation monitor is an alternative to laboratory venipuncture. Its promoted advantages are: it obtains a blood sample by finger-stick versus venipuncture; rapid turnaround time for results; resultant dosage adjustments (as appropriate) performed in minutes versus hours or days after testing; relative ease of use by nonlaboratory personnel; and potential for home monitoring. This project compared the results of INRs obtained through the venipuncture/laboratory process to INRs obtained by the portable monitoring process at the National Naval Medical Center. A correlation coefficient of 0.97 was determined. The difference in the mean INR results of the two testing methods was not clinically significant (p = 0.269). The portable monitor was determined to be a viable alternative to laboratory testing.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

The value of plasma calibrants in correcting coagulometer effects on international normalized ratios. An international multicenter study.

A study of lyophilized plasma calibrants in correcting for coagulometer effects on International Normalized Ratios (INR) has been conducted in an international survey. Prothrombin times were performed with the calibrants on 2 "common" thromboplastins and in-house thromboplastins in 3 brands of coagulometer at 37 centers. The International Sensitivity Indices (ISI) of 95 local systems with the calibrants were derived. The "true" INR of 10 test plasmas from warfarin-treated patients were established centrally using thromboplastin International Reference Preparations (IRP). International Normalized Ratios of these plasmas for each center were calculated using both the manufacturers' stated and the local ISI. The mean deviation of the 95 systems from the "true" INR of the warfarin plasmas was +14.4% with the manufacturers' ISI, but reduced to +1.04% with the local ISI. Local ISI determination with the calibrants avoids many of the difficulties of conventional thromboplastin calibrations. Plasmas from patients on warfarin and parallel manual PT with thromboplastin IRP are not required.

Blood Coagulation Tests↗

PubMed1996

Calibration verification of the International Normalized Ratio.

The International Normalized Ratio (INR) system for reporting the prothrombin time (PT) is essentially a calibration activity intended to standardize PT reporting across various reagent/instrument systems. However, complete standardization of PT reporting through the INR has been difficult to achieve for a variety of reasons, including inaccurate assignment of thromboplastin International Sensitivity Indexes (ISIs) and specific (local) reagent/instrument effects. Until now, the individual laboratory has not been able to easily verify the accuracy of its INR. Using standard lyophilized plasmas with INR values assigned against IRP RBT/90 rabbit thromboplastin, the authors present a method that allows a laboratory to locally verify its range of accuracy for the INR. The method is illustrated on a single coagulometer with two thromboplastin lots of differing sensitivity (Pacific Hemostasis Thromboplastin-DS and Thromboplastin-D from rabbit sources, with respective International Sensitivity Indexes of 1.20 and 1.97). In this illustration of the method, the accuracy of Thromboplastin-DS was superior to that of Thromboplastin-D. Interpretation of the data and cautions regarding the use of standard plasmas for calibration verification are discussed. Using this method, a reportable range of accuracy at a given error tolerance can be established locally for INR measurements within a laboratory. Laboratories of any size can apply this method to study the accuracy of their INR reagent/instrument systems, thus performing calibration verification. When used in conjunction with assessments of assay precision, this method can help laboratories to select better reagent/instrument systems and thereby produce more accurate and more clinically meaningful INR results.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

The influence of the reference mean prothrombin time on the international normalized ratio.

The International Normalized Ratio (INR) is a mathematical transformation of the prothrombin time (PT). The transformation requires a laboratory to compute the geometric mean of its own reference population. In this paper, the authors examine how the reference mean PT influences the INR accuracy and precision using a validated probabilistic model. The variance of the geometric mean of reference populations in three laboratory settings was determined. Because the variance of an individual laboratory geometric mean is not directly determinable by simple parametric equations, its variance is estimated using bootstrap analysis. The geometric mean is compared to the computationally simpler arithmetic mean for effects on accuracy and precision of the resulting INR. The study shows mathematically and empirically that using the arithmetic mean biases INR determinations so that patients tend to be over-anticoagulated. However, in the laboratory settings examined, the amount of bias was both statistically and clinically insignificant. An analysis of the effect on the INR of errors in estimating the geometric mean reference PT also is performed. For large biases in estimating the reference mean, the INR can be significantly affected and can trigger inappropriate clinical actions in patients. The authors demonstrate empirically and mathematically that biases in the geometric mean reference PT do not affect the INR coefficient of variation. However, they produce significant differences in confidence intervals for INR determinations. Laboratories must exercise care in determining specific reference means to ensure that biases do not occur in geometric mean reference PT determinations. This can be achieved by circumspection in the selection of normal subjects for the reference population, carefully reviewing the data, and performing the proper calculations on the data.

Female↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Quality control of the prothrombin time and international normalized ratios. National and international schemes.

The international normalized ratios (INR) system allows valid comparisons in results and quality of performance to be made between users of different thromboplastin reagents. In the international quality control surveys currently over 80% of the 53 countries participating report INR. Stated local international sensitivity index (ISI) values show fair agreement with values calculated from quality control returns obtained with local and reference reagents. The coefficient of variations (CV) of the INR in these surveys are between 11-22% depending upon INR values. In comparison, CV of the UK national scheme are currently 7-13%. However, analysis of UK results has shown high CV with high ISI reagents. This is due to the ISI effect as CV of INR is CV of prothrombin ratio (PR) multiplied by the ISI. Ideal thromboplastins should show good precision of PR and a low ISI to prevent this apparent deterioration when PR results are transformed into the INR scale. Instrumentation has a further effect on the INR result. Unfortunately, the effect is not uniform even within instrument type and model or even between normal and therapeutic results. Local instrument adjustment or local calibration is therefore necessary. Thus, quality control surveys continue to highlight problems in prothrombin time standardization.

Automation↗

PubMed1996

Reliability of the international normalized ratio for monitoring the induction phase of warfarin: comparison with the prothrombin time ratio.

The International Normalized Ratio (INR) was introduced to reduce the variability of prothrombin time (PT) reporting. One potential problem with the use of the INR is the assumption that its reliability is reduced when it is used to monitor patients during the induction phase of treatment. This shortcoming arises because the model used to establish the INR system is based on the use of pooled plasma from patients stabilized on warfarin for at least 6 weeks. Because the prolongation of the PT by warfarin during the induction phase mainly reflects reduction in factor VII levels (whereas the prolongation of the PT after 6 weeks of stabilization reflects reductions in factors X, II, and VII), there exists a potential for loss of accuracy of the INR during warfarin induction. To overcome this potential problem, it has been suggested that the PT ratio should be used to report results during the induction phase of treatment and that the INR system should be reserved for reporting results after the patient has been stabilized. This approach is confusing to the clinician. In addition, the validity of this approach has never been demonstrated in a clinical study. To address this issue, we studied 43 patients for the first 5 days after they started warfarin therapy. We measured the PT in the same plasma samples from each patient with five different commercial thromboplastins. The variance in the PT ratios among the five thromboplastins was compared with the variance obtained with the INR values derived from the PT ratios when using the international sensitivity indexes provided by the manufacturer. Our results indicate that, even during the induction phase, there is less variance with the INR system than with the PT ratio system.

Anticoagulants↗

PubMed1994

Assessing random error in the international normalized ratio.

Changes in the international normalized ratio (INR) following warfarin administration may be explained not only by the attendant anticoagulant effect but also, in part, by random errors normally associated with laboratory assays. Thus, a patient's true INR will differ from the reported value by some random error related to the variability in the prothrombin time (PT) assay. By employing a statistical technique known as the delta method, the error expected in an INR for a particular institution can be estimated by taking the product of the international sensitivity index (ISI) and the coefficient of variation (CV) for the PT assay.

Drug Monitoring↗

PubMed1996

Prothrombin time in liver failure: time, ratio, activity percentage, or international normalized ratio?

Prothrombin time (PT) is a universal indicator of liver disease severity. However, variability in thromboplastin reagents leads to large interlaboratory differences in PT results. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of the international normalized ratio (INR) or other modes of expression might achieve PT standardization in patients with liver failure. PT was measured with seven thromboplastin reagents with different sensitivities in plasmas from 27 patients with miscellaneous chronic and acute liver failure and, as a control population, 29 patients on oral anticoagulation therapy. PT was expressed in seconds, ratio, activity percentage, and INR. In patients with liver failure, only activity percentage expression eliminated variability in PT results obtained with the seven thromboplastins while INR, seconds, and ratio values remained significantly different (P < .01). In patients on oral anticoagulant therapy, only INR normalized PT results. We conclude that, in patients with liver failure, INR fails to yield a PT expression independent of the thromboplastin used and only activity percentage expression may provide a common international scale of PT reporting.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1997

Effect of citrate concentration in specimen collection tubes on the International Normalized Ratio.

PROBLEM: Does citrate concentration in specimen collection tubes affect the International Normalized Ratio? METHODS: The International Normalized Ratio was determined on quadruplicate plasma specimens from 32 patients treated long term with oral anticoagulants-two from tubes with 3.2% citrate and two with 3.8% citrate. Two laboratories, using two different coagulometers, tested the specimens. RESULTS: International Normalized Ratios of plasma from tubes with 3.8% citrate were significantly higher than those from tubes with 3.2% citrate when tested with either coagulometer. Patients given adequate anticoagulation on the basis of the International Normalized Ratio at one concentration of citrate appeared either overanticoagulated and at risk of bleeding or underanticoagulated and at risk of thromboembolism at the other concentration of citrate. CONCLUSION: Results emphasize the need for using a single concentration of citrate for prothrombin time testing. We recommend 3.2% citrate.

Anticoagulants↗

PubMed1990

Evaluation of international normalized ratios by a controlled field survey with 4 different thromboplastin reagents.

A nationwide survey has been performed in Japan involving 75 laboratories to assess the relative reliability of different methods of reporting prothrombin time results in anticoagulant control. The interchangeability of results using prothrombin time, prothrombin activity percentage, prothrombin ratio and international normalized ratios (INR) were compared with four different thromboplastin reagents and a range of coagulometers. A secondary batch of reference thromboplastin of human brain origin (BCT/454) was used to calibrate the local thromboplastins and for comparison of methods of reporting. The study revealed the closest agreement of the results between BCT and the other reagents, and the regression lines of these reagents were almost identical, when the results were reported as INR. Box-Whisker plot analysis showed that the distribution of the results was large with the more deficient plasmas with all methods of reporting. It was found by this analysis that the interchangeability of the results was greatest when the results were expressed by INR, because the mean values obtained of each plasma using different thromboplastin reagents gave the lowest CV and the frequency of the far-out data was least, compared with the other methods of expression. On the other hand, the type of coagulometer had almost as much effect as the thromboplastin reagent on the prothrombin time, even if INR was used. Interchangeability of INR would be further improved by providing ISI values for each reagent/instrument combination.

Humans↗

PubMed1997

Using the international normalized ratio to standardize prothrombin time.

The international normalized ratio, or INR, was introduced in 1983 by the World Health Organization, or WHO, Committee on Biological Standards to more accurately assess patients receiving anticoagulation therapy. The INR mandates the universal standardization of prothrombin time. This article describes the method used to calculate INR, as well as its clinical relevance to the practice of dentistry.

Anticoagulants↗

PubMed1998

A cross-Canada survey of prothrombin time testing: Does the establishment of local ISI values improve the accuracy of international normalized ratio reporting? Thrombosis Interest Group of Canada.

The international normalized ratio (INR) was established as a means of standardizing the prothrombin time regardless of the thromboplastin used in the individual laboratories. The INR is the prothrombin time ratio of the sample raised to the power of the International Sensitivity Index (ISI). Traditionally, the ISI is determined by using a manual clotting technique by comparing the test thromboplastin with a World Health Organization international reference thromboplastin with results from 60 patient samples standardized on warfarin, and 20 samples from normal volunteers. Most laboratories no longer perform prothrombin time testing by a manual technique but instead automate the procedure by using a variety of coagulation instruments. Thromboplastin ISI values have the potential to be modified considerably by instrumentation, and as a consequence, they, may result in INRs that are unreliable when compared to those obtained by the traditional manual method. It has been proposed that the use of calibrant plasmas tested with the laboratory's thromboplastin and instrument may overcome this problem and a local ISI value could be established. Our study objective was to determine whether a local ISI calibration with the plasma calibrants could reduce the variation of the INR over a wide range of thromboplastin/ instrument combinations. A total of 58 laboratories from across Canada, including community hospitals, private laboratories, and large tertiary care units, participated. The findings indicate that the use of calibrant plasmas to calculate the local ISI does improve the accuracy of INR reporting in the majority of thromboplastin/instrument combinations.

Autoanalysis↗

PubMed1998

The effect of recombinant factor VIIa (NovoSeven) in healthy volunteers receiving acenocoumarol to an International Normalized Ratio above 2.0.

Vitamin K antagonists are most commonly used in long-term thrombosis prophylaxis and the use in patients with cardiovascular disease seems to be increasing. By interfering with the normal hemostatic mechanism, an increased risk of bleeding will arise and administration of human plasma or prothrombin complex concentrates may be necessary. It can be difficult to normalize hemostasis using plasma and prothrombin complex concentrates, because these may be associated with thromboembolic side-effects. The level of factor VII, one of the vitamin-K-dependent coagulation factors, decreases during oral anticoagulant therapy and the administration of recombinant factor VIIa normalizes the prolonged prothrombin time in warfarin-treated rats. After administration of acenocoumarol (International Normalized Ratio > 2), decreased levels of factor X and factor IX (19-46%), protein C (2-20%) and factor VII (4-17%) were found in 28 healthy volunteers. After one dose of recombinant factor VIIa (5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 120, 160, 240, or 320 microg/kg) the International Normalized Ratio and prothrombin time normalized, which may imply an effect on bleeding in individuals receiving oral anticoagulant therapy. The lowest dose (5 microg/kg) normalized the International Normalized Ratio for 12 h and doses > 120 microg/kg normalized it for 24 h. Fragment 1+2 stayed within its normal range in all dose groups, indicating that no systemic coagulation occurred.

Acenocoumarol↗

PubMed1995

Temporary discontinuation of warfarin therapy: changes in the international normalized ratio.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the rate of decrease of the international normalized ratio (INR) after temporary discontinuation of warfarin therapy. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of an outpatient cohort. SETTING: University medical center anticoagulation clinic. PATIENTS: 22 patients receiving a fixed evening dose of warfarin for whom temporary discontinuation of therapy was deemed safe. MEASUREMENTS: Serial plasma samples were drawn for INR measurements approximately 20, 65, 115, and 185 hours after patients received the last dose of warfarin. In five patients, INR was measured twice daily for 5 days. RESULTS: For patients with a mean steady-state INR of 2.6, the mean INR 65 hours (2.7 days) after discontinuation of warfarin therapy was 1.6 (range, 1.11 to 2.16); 20 of 22 patients (91%) had an INR greater than 1.2. The mean INR 115 hours (4.7 days) after discontinuation of warfarin therapy was 1.1; 5 of 22 patients (23%) had an INR of 1.2 or greater. In 5 patients studied in detail, the INR decreased exponentially and had a half-life that ranged from 0.52 to 1.2 days; the onset of maximal decrease began 24 to 36 hours after discontinuation of warfarin therapy. In the total cohort, age was a significant (P < 0.005) independent predictor of smaller decreases in the INR between day 1 and day 3 (regression coefficient = -6.8% +/- 2%/2 days per decade of age; R2 = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: By simulating preoperative discontinuation of warfarin therapy, we found that the INR decreases exponentially, with wide interpatient variation in the rate of decrease. Age is associated with a slower rate of decrease. To be certain that the INR at the time of the surgery is less than 1.2, warfarin should be withheld for 96 to 115 hours (4 doses) in patients with a steady-state INR between 2.0 and 3.0. For patients with a higher steady-state INR, a longer wait is necessary.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

The international normalized ratio (INR) for monitoring warfarin therapy: reliability and relation to other monitoring methods.

OBJECTIVE: To enhance understanding of the reliability of the international normalized ratio (INR) for monitoring warfarin therapy and its relation to other monitoring techniques. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A university hospital. PATIENTS: 79 patients attending an anticoagulation clinic. MEASUREMENTS: International normalized ratios obtained with a portable capillary monitor (Coumatrak) and the following from a simultaneous plasma sample: INRs from prothrombin times done with six thromboplastins, prothrombin-proconvertin (P&P) test activity, specific prothrombin activity, and native prothrombin antigen. RESULTS: Converting to INRs failed to standardize prothrombin time results obtained with high- and low-sensitivity thromboplastins. Coumatrak INRs correlated best with INRs obtained with high-sensitivity thromboplastins. The INR range of 2.0 to 3.0 corresponded to a P&P range of 30% to 13%, a native plasma prothrombin antigen range of 56 to 24 micrograms/mL, and a specific prothrombin activity range of 43% to 21%. CONCLUSIONS: Low-sensitivity thromboplastins may give erroneously high INRs in the upper therapeutic range. Plasma prothrombin times should be done with a high-sensitivity thromboplastin, particularly in patients maintained at the upper limit of the therapeutic range. An INR so obtained correlated well with an INR obtained with a portable capillary blood monitor.

Autoantigens↗

PubMed1997

International Normalized Ratio determination using calibrated reference plasmas.

We have compared the conventional method of International Normalized Ratio (INR) determination with an alternative method involving extrapolation from a calibration curve using freeze-dried 'reference' plasmas. The latter approach does not require the determination of a mean normal prothrombin time (MNPT) or local system International Sensitivity Index (ISI). Calibration curves were constructed by plotting local prothrombin time (PT) against assigned INR values for a normal plasma and either two plasma pools from patients on oral anticoagulants or two artificially depleted plasmas. Six laboratories determined the INR of a freeze-dried test plasma and frozen patient plasma samples using the conventional method and by extrapolation. Similarities in the results with the freeze-dried test plasma and the frozen plasmas were encouraging for the projected use with fresh plasma samples. INR values by the conventional method for the test plasma gave an overall mean of 2.73 and inter-laboratory variability (gcv%) of 8.92%, whereas estimates by extrapolation against the normal and patient plasmas or the normal and artificially depleted plasmas gave identical overall mean INR values of 2.70 with inter-laboratory variability (gcv%) of 3.44% and 4.92% respectively. The results indicate that INR determination by extrapolation is associated with reduced interlaboratory variability.

Blood Coagulation Tests↗

PubMed1988

The reliability of international normalized ratios during short-term oral anticoagulant treatment.

The reliability of the international normalized ratios (INR) system in the induction phase of coumarin administration has been studied in 15 serial patients over the first 7-40 days of treatment (mean 13.1). The INR results obtained with a variety of thromboplastin reagents have been compared with those obtained with the WHO second primary IRP, BCT/253. A wide divergence of INR values was observed with the various thromboplastins on each day of testing. INR values cannot therefore be relied upon with some of these reagents in the early days of anticoagulant treatment. This probably arises from the difference in responses of the thromboplastins to depression of vitamin K-dependent clotting factors. Consistent deviations from the IRP suggested that additional error may be due to inaccurate calibration of their products by the manufacturers. When the slopes of the sensitivity of the individual reagents to clotting factors II, VII and X were compared, however, results overall more closely approximated to those of the IRP when the INR were substituted for simple prothrombin ratios.

Acenocoumarol↗

PubMed1991

Determination of the mean normal prothrombin time for assessment of international normalized ratios. Usefulness of lyophilized plasma.

To report a Prothrombin Time (PT) as International Normalized Ratio in controlling oral anticoagulant therapy, the Mean Normal PT (MNPT) is required. To correct for methodological differences in performing the PT test, each laboratory should determine its own MNPT for each batch of reagent using fresh blood samples from a large number of normal individuals. This would be a laborious procedure. Two models for simplified assessment of MNPT were investigated by two laboratories in a collaborative study. According to the models, the MNPT of a new batch of reagent is calculated, using the PT of a lyophilized control plasma measured with the new batch and a reference batch, as well as the MNPT of the reference batch obtained with fresh samples. Experimental results were obtained with 19 batches of bovine thromboplastin, 4 lyophilized normal control plasmas and fresh blood samples of 40 normal individuals. The PTs of the 4 lyophilized normal control plasmas were not identical to the MNPT of the fresh normal samples and also different from each other. Therefore, the uncorrected PTs of these control plasmas cannot be used as MNPT. In general, there was good agreement between measured and calculated MNPT, although some control plasmas gave better results than others. There were no significant differences between the results obtained by both calculation models.

Freeze Drying↗