PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Irritable Bowel Syndrome”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Altered gastric emptying in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome is the most frequent functional disorder of the digestive system. Patients with irritable bowel syndrome have motor disorders not only in the colon, but also in other parts of the digestive tract such as the oesophagus and small intestine; however, it is not known whether the stomach is also involved. We used a radiolabelled mixed solid-liquid meal (technetium-99m for the solid component, indium-111 for the liquid component) to study gastric emptying of solids (GES), liquids (GEL) and indigestible solids (GER) in 50 patients diagnosed as having irritable bowel syndrome (30 with predominant constipation and 20 with predominant diarrhoea). GER was measured by counting the number of indigestible solids remaining in the stomach 4 h after they were swallowed. In patients with irritable bowel syndrome, GES and GEL were slower than in control subjects (P<0.05). GER was normal in all patients except for two women. Thirty-two patients (64%) showed delayed GES, 29 (58%) delayed GEL, and 2 (4%) delayed GER. Among patients with irritable bowel syndrome, GES was slower in those with predominant constipation than in those with predominant diarrhoea (P<0.05); GEL and GER were similar in both groups. Gastroparesis was found in a large proportion of patients with irritable bowel syndrome, suggesting the presence of a more generalised motor disorder of the gut.

Adult↗

Food hypersensitivity and irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome is a common condition but its pathophysiology remains poorly understood. Many irritable bowel syndrome patients give a history of food intolerance, but data from dietary elimination and re-challenge studies are inconclusive. Multiple aetio-pathological mechanisms have been postulated. The gut has an extensive immune system but current understanding of processing of food antigens in health and disease is limited. There is no clinically useful marker available to test for food hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome. Researchers have employed both skin tests and serum immunoglobulins (IgG and IgE) as markers of food hypersensitivity in various disorders including irritable bowel syndrome, but published data are equivocal. In this article, the evidence for the role of food hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome is reviewed and, based on the available data, a possible pathophysiological hypothesis has been formulated.

Allergens↗

Childhood sexual abuse and psychosomatic symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome is characterized by chronic gastrointestinal symptoms without a demonstrable physical cause. In a subgroup of patients, irritable bowel syndrome may be part of a cluster of psychosomatic symptoms related to childhood sexual abuse. To investigate this possibility, the Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule (DDIS), the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) and the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) were administered to 105 subjects with either irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis), or other gastrointestinal disorders. The subjects in the three groups did not differ on the DES, the SCL-90 or most sections of the DDIS. However, subjects with irritable bowel syndrome reported much higher rates of childhood sexual abuse and psychosomatic symptoms.

Adult↗

Histopathological alterations in irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome is a common disorder defined by a symptom complex including abdominal pain and altered bowel habit. The etiopathogenesis appears to be multifactorial and to involve altered gastrointestinal motor function, enhanced perception of visceral stimuli and psychosocial factors. More recently a role for mucosal immune activation has been suggested. Routine histologic examination reveals no mucosal abnormality in the majority of cases but quantitative histological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analyses reveal subtle morphologic changes involving lymphocytes, mast cells, enterochromaffin cells and enteric nerves. The recent appreciation of these changes has led to new hypotheses linking central and enteric nervous systems to immune processes. This review highlights the spectrum of morphologic changes that occur in irritable bowel syndrome, examines their relationship to the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome and considers their relevance to daily pathology practice.

Humans↗

Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome affects 10 to 15 percent of the U.S. population to some degree. This condition is defined as abdominal pain and discomfort with altered bowel habits in the absence of any other mechanical, inflammatory, or biochemical explanation for these symptoms. Irritable bowel syndrome is more likely to affect women than men and is most common in patients 30 to 50 years of age. Symptoms are improved equally by diets supplemented with fiber or hydrolyzed guar gum, but more patients prefer hydrolyzed guar gum. Antispasmodic agents may be used as needed, but anticholinergic and other side effects limit their use in some patients. Loperamide is an option for treatment of moderately severe diarrhea. Antidepressants have been shown to relieve pain and may be effective in low doses. Trials using alosetron showed a clinically significant, although modest, gain over placebo, but it is indicated only for women with severe diarrhea-predominant symptoms or for those in whom conventional treatment has failed. Tegaserod has an advantage over placebo in constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome; it is indicated for up to 12 weeks of treatment in women. However, postmarketing reports of severe diarrhea and ischemic colitis further limit its use. Herbal therapies such as peppermint oil also may be effective in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Therapies should focus on specific gastrointestinal dysfunctions (e.g., constipation, diarrhea, pain), and medications only should be used when nonprescription remedies do not work or when symptoms are severe.

Adult↗

[Differences in definitions of irritable bowel syndrome].

Irritable bowel syndrome is inconsistently defined. The resulting difference in study populations may impede general application of results from one study to another. The aim of this study was to evaluate the consistency of various definitions. At a follow-up of a sex-and age-stratified randomly selected cohort, participants filled in a questionnaire about abdominal symptoms. Questions categorized the participants according to five different definitions of irritable bowel syndrome:1) two Manning criteria,2) Rome criteria,3) consensus report by Drossman,4) definition by Talley and 5) definition by Kay. The participation rate was 64.4%. Manning and Rome criteria were consistent with a kappa value of 0.72. Consistency was also present comparing definitions of Drossman. Tallay and Kay (kappa values of 0.60-0.66) All other comparisons had kappa values below 0.42. It is concluded that variations in study population selected by different definitions of Irritable Bowel Syndrome are so large that they impede general application of any results. There is a need for an international agreement on a definition of irritable bowel syndrome.

Abdominal Pain↗

Transrectal ultrasonography: relationship with anorectal manometry, electromyography and sensitivity tests in irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome is the most frequently diagnosed disorder in gastroenterology. It has been demonstrated with specialized motility studies that these patients compared to healthy subjects show changes in rectoanal electrical and mechanical activity and in rectoanal sensitivity. However, until now no report has been published on morphological alterations in the rectum or the internal anal sphincter. Twenty-five consecutive patients with irritable bowel syndrome (mean age 32, range 17-47 years; 24 females) were evaluated prospectively by transrectal ultrasonography, rectal sensitivity studies, and recordings of both electrical and mechanical activity of the distal rectum and internal anal sphincter during a 2-h inter-digestive period. Ten healthy volunteers (mean age 34.5, range 19-50 years) served as a control group. Paired and non-paired Student's two-tailed t test and linear regression analysis were used. It was shown that muscle thickness of the rectum during rest (4.7 +/- 0.1 mm) was correlated neither with its rectal spike amplitude (0.73 +/- 0.1 mV) nor with rectal spike frequency (17.06 +/- 3.6 spike/2 h). In addition, the diameter of the internal anal sphincter (1.2 +/- 0.1 mm) was correlated neither with its resting pressure, nor with frequency (17.1 +/- 3.2/2 h), duration (14.9 +/- 1.5 s), or amplitude (14.1 +/- 1.9 mmHg), of inhibition of the spontaneous rectoanal inhibitory reflex. No correlation was found between ultrasonographic parameters and rectal distension variables (r = 0.03). This study demonstrates for the first time morphological anorectal changes in patients with irritable bowel syndrome compared to healthy subjects, in addition to showing that morphological changes are independent of physiological ones. Therefore both transrectal ultrasonography to determine anorectal morphology and electromanometry to assess anorectal function are important measures in the evaluation of patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

Adolescent↗

Pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is defined as chronic-recurrent abdominal pain in absence of organic lesions. The crucial pathogenetic point is to establish whether pain is related to enhanced sensitivity of the patient or to an abnormal peripheral stimulus originating from the bowel. We can subdivide the patients with abdominal pain into two main groups: the first comprehends those patients with an abnormal response to a normal stimulus (i.e. an enhanced motor response to a meal) (irritable bowel syndrome) and second those patients who have a normal response to an abnormal stimulus (i.e. alimentary factors, laxatives, bile acids) (irritated bowel syndrome). On the basis of our knowledge we can say that the pathogenesis of IBS is complex and not yet completely defined. The crucial point is represented by our capability to discriminate between the "irritable" and "irritated" colon.

Abdominal Pain↗

Management of irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome is the most common functional disorder of the gastrointestinal tract and is frequently treated by family physicians. Despite patients' worries about the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome, it is a benign condition. The diagnosis should be made using standard criteria after red flags that may signify organic disease have been ruled out. An effective physician-patient relationship is vital to successful management. Episodes of diarrhea are best managed with loperamide, while constipation often will respond to fiber supplements. Antispasmodics or anticholinergic agents may help relieve the abdominal pain of irritable bowel syndrome. Refractory cases are often treated with tricyclic antidepressants. Newer agents such as tegaserod and ondansetron target neurotransmitter receptors in the gastrointestinal tract Some forms of psychologic treatment may be helpful, and gastroenterology consultation is occasionally needed to reassure the patient. Comorbid conditions such as depression or anxiety should be investigated and treated.

Abdominal Pain↗

Adequate relief as an endpoint in clinical trials in irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome is characterized by recurrent abdominal pain and altered bowel function. In designing studies to evaluate new treatments for this disease, however, it is difficult to select appropriate endpoints to reflect improvement in the range of symptoms of the syndrome. In the present study we evaluated the parameter of adequate relief of abdominal pain and discomfort, as perceived by the patients, as a key endpoint for efficacy in the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Abdominal pain and bowel function data were collected daily from 370 patients with the disease during treatment with placebo or a novel potent 5HT3 receptor antagonist. Once every 7 days adequate relief of pain and discomfort was assessed. Quality-of-life data were collected using self-administered questionnaires. The endpoint of adequate relief was significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with improvement in pain severity scores, percentage of pain-free days, percentage of days with urgency, improvement in stool frequency and consistency, and quality-of-life parameters. Adequate relief of pain and discomfort is significantly correlated with changes in multiple parameters associated with irritable bowel syndrome and can be used as an endpoint for assessing response to therapy in these patients.

Abdominal Pain↗

Physiological correlates of colonic motility in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome is frequently encountered in clinical practice, and it has been repeatedly suggested that abnormal colonic motor activity is one of the major pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the origin of symptoms in such disorder. If this statement is true, then high-amplitude propagated colonic contractions (HAPCs), i.e. the mass movements, may play an important role. To test this hypothesis, we conducted an investigation by recording colonic motility for a prolonged (24 h) period in 25 patients with irritable bowel syndrome and in 18 healthy volunteers, to compare the number of mass movements over 24 h in patients (constipation-predominant, alternating bowel habits) and controls. The overall amount of motility was also assessed in twelve patients and 13 controls. We also looked for the possible changes in mass movements and motility which may occur with defecation and after a meal. The results showed that 1) with respect to HAPCs and motility index, neither group was significantly different from controls; 2) HAPCs and the motility index were significantly reduced during sleep in all groups tested; 3) HAPCs were significantly more common before as compared to after defecation and after as compared to before meals; 4) HAPCs are not independent from the segmental contractile activity; 5) the motility index/24 h was lower in the constipation-predominant group of patients with respect to controls. We conclude that in patients with irritable bowel syndrome colonic motility per se may play a pathophysiological role in the genesis of the symptoms, although other mechanisms are likely to concur, or to be responsible for the complaints of these patients. However, colonic prolonged recordings are very useful for studying physiological and pathophysiological correlates of sleep, eating, and defecation.

Adult↗

Drug treatment of the irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is defined as a functional bowel disorder in which abdominal pain is associated with defecation or a change in bowel habit, and with features of disordered defecation and distension. The irritable bowel syndrome occurs in 10 to 20% of people worldwide and is very commonly encountered in clinical practice. This has encouraged the pharmaceutical industry to search for effective drug therapy. So far, a universally effective agent has not been found, and since this is a chronic, benign disorder, beginning in youth, long term drug use should be avoided. Nevertheless, if a specific IBS symptom, such as constipation or abdominal pain dominates, a specific drug may be helpful. However, tests and treatment should be minimised or even avoided in order to do no harm. A largely nonpharmaceutical approach to IBS should be taken. This approach employs drugs sparingly and then only targeted at specific and resistant symptoms.

Analgesics↗

Irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome is a common gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain and a change in bowel habits. It is estimated to occur in 9% to 22% of the US population, and is more often diagnosed in women than in men. There are no diagnostic markers for irritable bowel syndrome and no evidence of organic disease. Moreover, the pathophysiology is not completely understood; however, abnormal gastrointestinal motility, altered sensory activity, central neural dysfunction, psychological disturbances, and luminal factors have been proposed. Treatment requires a multifaceted approach. Education, dietary measures, fiber supplementation, and pharmacological and psychological interventions have been used in the management of this disorder.

Antidiarrheals↗

Intestinal motor function in irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome is widely considered to be associated with disordered gastro-intestinal motility. The evidence for a motor disorder in the colon and small intestine of patients with irritable bowel syndrome is reviewed. Results of myoelectric, motility and transit studies in both the colon and small intestine are inconsistent. Difficulties in interpreting colonic motility have led investigators to address the small intestine as a possible site of dysmotility. An increase in the number of clustered contractions in the proximal small intestine has been reported by some, but not all investigators. Methodological differences as well as patient selection, symptom severity and fluctuation may all contribute to discrepancies between the results of different studies. Motility disturbances may be present which are currently unrecognised due to an inadequate understanding of the propagation of colonic contractions, and of small intestinal contractions during phase II and postprandially. Whether the reported motor disturbances arise locally in the gut or originate from higher centres in the central nervous system has not been established.

Colon↗

Medical and psychological aspects of irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome is a disease process commonly encountered by primary care providers. Although the cause of this illness is unknown, much is known about the pathophysiology and strong psychosocial influences. Medical practitioners often are aware of the medical aspects of managing irritable bowel syndrome but are not familiar with specific psychologic options. Long-term care of these patients may be aided by collaboration with mental health professionals.

Algorithms↗

[Irritable bowel syndrome].

Irritable bowel syndrome is a functional disease with highly variable symptoms and difficult to diagnose. The clinical picture is fundamental to reach a correct diagnosis and discard other gastrointestinal diseases. It etiology is not well known; psychological problems and stress probably play an important role in the development of the disease. Irritable bowel syndrome impairs the quality of life of patients and is a frequent cause of consultation in primary care. Its therapy is basically symptomatic and requires psychological support. The physician must warn his/her patients that immediate results are rarely obtained and that a prolonged clinical follow up may be necessary.

Colonic Diseases, Functional↗

New drugs in the management of the irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) continues to provide a major therapeutic challenge to clinicians and those involved in drug development. It seems unlikely from the data before us that this multisymptom syndrome with peripheral and central components is likely to respond reliably in all patients to the same single agent. There is still a lack of well designed, appropriately powered, randomised clinical trials and the problems of dealing with the high placebo response rate in this group of patients remains a dilemma for trial designers. There are, however, some new ideas, particularly those relating to the role of hyperalgesia in IBS. For many patients, abdominal pain and bloating are the most distressing symptoms of this disease and the new drugs targeted at pain control, such as kappa agonists and serotonin antagonists (5-HT3) and possibly 5-HT4), may eventually find a place in the clinical management of this syndrome. Other candidates include somatostatin analogues and antidepressants, the latter predominantly for their effects on increasing pain threshold. More speculative new drugs for IBS include cholecystokinin antagonists such as loxiglumide and the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue, leuprorelin (leuprolide). The results of on-going randomised clinical trials are still awaited for some of these newer agents. The irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common gastrointestinal condition encountered by general practitioners and is reported to account for up to 50% of the work of gastroenterologists in secondary care. However, most people with the symptoms of IBS (60 to 75%) do not consult a doctor. Its cause is unknown, its development is poorly understand and, perhaps not surprisingly, no universally agreed approach to treatment exists.

Adult↗

Review article: irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome is a disease that can be diagnosed positively on the basis of an established series of criteria and limited exclusion of organic disease. It is the most common disease diagnosed by gastroenterologists and affects about 20% of all people at any one time. Symptoms fluctuate, and the overall prevalence rate is relatively constant in Western communities. Ten per cent of patients present to their physicians; the illness has a large economic impact on health-care utilization and absenteeism. Irritable bowel syndrome is a biopsychosocial disorder in which three major mechanisms interact: psychosocial factors; altered motility; and/or sensory function of the intestine. Management of patients is based on positive diagnosis of the symptom complex, limited exclusion of underlying organic disease and institution of a therapeutic trial. If patient symptoms are intractable, further investigations are needed to exclude significant motility or other disorders. Symptomatic treatment includes fibre for constipation, loperamide for diarrhoea and low-dose antidepressants or infrequent use of antispasmodics for pain; novel pharmacological agents, psychotherapy and hypnotherapy are being evaluated.

Colonic Diseases, Functional↗