SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Ivabradine”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Rationale and design of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ivabradine in patients with stable coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: the morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I(f) inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction (BEAUTIFUL) study.

BACKGROUND: Raised resting heart rate (HR) is associated with increased cardiovascular and total mortality. Ivabradine is a new specific HR-reducing agent, which has been shown to have antianginal and anti-ischemic properties in patients with stable angina. Because patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction are at high risk of cardiac events and death, we hypothesized that they could derive particular benefit from a specific HR-lowering agent such as ivabradine. METHODS: BEAUTIFUL is a multicenter, randomized, international, double-blind placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the superiority of ivabradine over placebo in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction < or = 39%). The primary end point is the composite of cardiovascular mortality and hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction or new onset or worsening of heart failure. This event-driven study will randomize 9650 patients and continue until 950 primary end points have occurred, providing 90% power to detect a 19% reduction in relative risk. In approximately 660 centers, men and women aged > or = 55 years if nondiabetic and > or = 18 years if diabetic are randomized to placebo or oral ivabradine (5 mg twice daily for 2 weeks then target dose of 7.5 mg twice daily). Follow-up is expected to last between 18 and 36 months. RESULTS: The first patient was randomized in January 2005. CONCLUSION: BEAUTIFUL will be the first major outcome trial of a specific HR-reducing agent. The study results are expected in 2008.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Novel If current inhibitor ivabradine: safety considerations.

Ivabradine is a novel heart-rate-lowering agent that acts specifically on the sinoatrial node by selectively inhibiting the I(f) current, which is the current predominantly responsible for the slow diastolic depolarization of pacemaker cells. Unlike many rate-lowering agents, ivabradine reduces heart rate in a dose-dependent manner both at rest and during exercise without producing any negative inotropic or vasoconstrictor effect. The bradycardic effect of ivabradine is proportional to the resting heart rate, such that the effect tends to plateau. Thus, extreme sinus bradycardia is uncommon. Less than 1% of patients withdrew from therapy because of untoward sinus bradycardia. The QT interval is expectedly prolonged with the reduction in heart rate, but after appropriate correction for heart rate and in direct comparisons of the QT interval when the influence of the heart rate was controlled by atrial pacing, no significant effect of ivabradine on ventricular repolarization duration was demonstrated. Consequently, ivabradine has no direct torsadogenic potential, although, for obvious reasons, the specific bradycardic drug should not be administered with agents which have known rate-lowering and/or QTprolonging effects. Ivabradine has little effect on the atrioventricular node and ventricular refractoriness, but because of its effect on the sinus node, it should be avoided in patients with sick sinus syndrome. The physiological significance of upregulation of the I(f) current in the His-Purkinje system and ventricular myocardium due to ionic remodeling in pathophysiological conditions, such as end-stage heart failure, and the effects of ivabradine have yet to be explored. Because ivabradine also binds to hyperpolarization voltage-gated channels which carry the I(h) current in the eye, transient, dose-dependent changes of the electroretinogram resulting in mild to moderate visual side effects (phenomes) may occur in approximately 15% of patients exposed to ivabradine. Ivabradine does not cross the blood-brain barrier and therefore, has no effect on the I(h) current in central nervous system neurons. The safety of ivabradine has been assessed in a development program that enrolled over 3,500 patients and 800 healthy volunteers in 36 countries from Europe, North and South America, Africa, Asia and Australia, 1,200 of whom were exposed to ivabradine for over 1 year. Ivabradine has been associated with a good safety profile during its clinical development and its safety will be further assessed by postmarketing surveillance and during on-going clinical trials.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2005

Efficacy of ivabradine, a new selective I(f) inhibitor, compared with atenolol in patients with chronic stable angina.

AIMS: Ivabradine, a new I(f) inhibitor which acts specifically on the pacemaker activity of the sinoatrial node, is a pure heart rate lowering agent. Ivabradine has shown anti-ischaemic and anti-anginal activity in a placebo-controlled trial. The objective of this study was to compare the anti-anginal and anti-ischaemic effects of ivabradine and the beta-blocker atenolol. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a double-blinded trial, 939 patients with stable angina were randomized to receive ivabradine 5 mg bid for 4 weeks and then either 7.5 or 10 mg bid for 12 weeks or atenolol 50 mg od for 4 weeks and then 100 mg od for 12 weeks. Patients underwent treadmill exercise tests at randomization (M(0)) and after 4 (M(1)) and 16 (M(4)) weeks of therapy. Increases in total exercise duration (TED) at trough at M(4) were 86.8+/-129.0 and 91.7+/-118.8 s with ivabradine 7.5 and 10 mg, respectively and 78.8+/-133.4 s with atenolol 100 mg. Mean differences (SE) when compared with atenolol 100 mg were 10.3 (9.4) and 15.7 (9.5) s in favour of ivabradine 7.5 and 10 mg (P<0.001 for non-inferiority). TED at M(1) improved by 64.2+/-104.0 s with ivabradine 5 mg and by 60.0+/-114.4 s with atenolol 50 mg (P<0.001 for non-inferiority). Non-inferiority of ivabradine was shown at all doses and for all criteria. The number of angina attacks was decreased by two-thirds with both ivabradine and atenolol. CONCLUSION: Ivabradine is as effective as atenolol in patients with stable angina.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2004

Selective reduction of heart rate by ivabradine: effect on the visco-elastic arterial properties in rats.

BACKGROUND: The heart rate (HR) reduction obtained by ivabradine is associated in rats with a decrease in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean blood pressure (MBP), and with an increased pulsatile carotid arterial diameter. OBJECTIVE: To determine, in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats, whether acute reductions of the HR in response to ivabradine induced changes in the carotid visco-elastic behavior, as assessed by echo-tracking techniques. METHODS: The hysteresis of the carotid diameter/pressure curve was used to determine the dissipated energy per cardiac cycle, a classical index of arterial viscosity. Four doses of 1 mg/kg intravenous ivabradine were repeated in anesthetized rats to obtain subsequent HR reductions. RESULTS: In WKY, repeated administration of ivabradine produced reduction of MBP, DBP and HR, without change of systolic blood pressure (SBP). In SHR, ivabradine produced a higher reduction in DBP, SBP and HR than in WKY rats, but the increase in pulse pressure was similar in both strains. In SHR and WKY rats, ivabradine did not modify the incremental elastic modulus-stress curves, and shifted the distensibility-pressure curves through changes in blood pressure, indicating no modification in isobaric carotid stiffness. In both strains, ivabradine produced an identical increase of the energy dissipated per cardiac cycle. CONCLUSION: In WKY rats and SHR, acute ivabradine reduces MBP and DBP and increases pulse pressure, but without change in arterial stiffness. In both strains, the HR reduction due to ivabradine induces an identical increase of the energy dissipation of the arterial wall.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Heart rate lowering by specific and selective I(f) current inhibition with ivabradine: a new therapeutic perspective in cardiovascular disease.

Resting heart rate is associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, and the mortality benefit of some cardiovascular drugs seems to be related in part to their heart rate-lowering effects. Since it is difficult to separate the benefit of heart rate lowering from other actions with currently available drugs, a 'pure' heart rate-lowering drug would be of great interest in establishing the benefit of heart rate reduction per se. Heart rate is determined by spontaneous electrical pacemaker activity in the sinoatrial node. Cardiac pacemaker cells generate the spontaneous slow diastolic depolarisation that drives the membrane voltage away from a hyperpolarised level towards the threshold level for initiating a subsequent action potential, generating rhythmic action potentials that propagate through the heart and trigger myocardial contraction. The I(f) current is an ionic current that determines the slope of the diastolic depolarisation, which in turn controls the heart beating rate. Ivabradine is the first specific heart rate-lowering agent to have completed clinical development for stable angina pectoris. Ivabradine specifically blocks cardiac pacemaker cell f-channels by entering and binding to a site in the channel pore from the intracellular side. Ivabradine is selective for the I(f) current and exerts significant inhibition of this current and heart rate reduction at concentrations that do not affect other cardiac ionic currents. This activity translates into specific heart rate reduction, which reduces myocardial oxygen demand and simultaneously improves oxygen supply, by prolonging diastole and thus allowing increased coronary flow and myocardial perfusion. Ivabradine lowers heart rate without any negative inotropic or lusitropic effect, thus preserving ventricular contractility. Ivabradine was shown to reduce resting heart rate without modifying any major electrophysiological parameters not related to heart rate. In patients with left ventricular dysfunction, ivabradine reduced resting heart rate without altering myocardial contractility. Thus, pure heart rate lowering can be achieved in the clinic as a result of specific and selective I(f) current inhibition. Two randomised clinical studies have shown that ivabradine is an effective anti-ischaemic agent that reduces heart rate and improves exercise capacity in patients with stable angina. Ivabradine was shown to be superior to placebo in improving exercise tolerance test (ETT) criteria (n = 360) and, in a 4-month, double-blind, controlled study (n = 939), ivabradine 5 and 7.5mg twice daily were shown to be at least as effective as atenolol 50 and 100mg once daily, respectively, in improving total exercise duration and other ETT criteria, and reducing the number of angina attacks. Experimental data indicate a potential role of pure heart rate lowering in other cardiovascular conditions, such as heart failure.

Benzazepines↗

PubMed2003

Electrophysiological effects of a single intravenous administration of ivabradine (S 16257) in adult patients with normal baseline electrophysiology.

INTRODUCTION: Ivabradine is a heart rate-lowering agent that selectively inhibits the pacemaker current, I(f), in the sinoatrial node. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a single intravenous administration of ivabradine on cardiac electrophysiological parameters in patients with normal baseline electrophysiology. The safety profile of ivabradine was also investigated. STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label, single-dose, non-controlled study conducted at one centre. Patients received a single dose of ivabradine (0.2 mg/kg) intravenously as a slow bolus over 15 seconds. Electrophysiological investigations, after catheter ablation for cardiac dysrhythmia, were performed at baseline and 30 minutes and 1 hour after drug administration. Electrode catheters were introduced and advanced to the right atrium, the bundle of His and the right ventricular apex of the heart. Electrophysiological parameters assessed included heart rate, QT interval, corrected QT interval (QTc), PR interval, sinoatrial conduction time, sinus node recovery time, and right atrial and ventricle refractory periods. Changes in electrophysiological parameters over time were assessed using one-way analysis of variance. In the case of a significant time effect, the Newman-Keuls procedure was used for comparison. PATIENTS: A total of 14 patients, 12 male and 2 female, aged 18-75 years were included in the study. The arrhythmia requiring catheter ablation was atrioventricular (AV) excitation in seven patients, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in five patients, atrial fibrillation and flutter in one patient, and cardiac dysrhythmia in one patient. All patients had normal electrophysiology at baseline. RESULTS: Mean heart rate decreased significantly with ivabradine by 12.9 beats/min at 30 minutes and 14.1 beats/min at 1 hour. The mean QT interval increased but QTc showed no significant change from baseline. The PR and QRS intervals were unchanged. The right atrial and right ventricle refractory periods showed no significant change from baseline. The measured QT interval and the sinus node recovery time were increased. There were no clinically relevant changes in any other major electrophysiological parameters. Ivabradine was well tolerated and no serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: A single intravenous dose of ivabradine had a significant heart rate-lowering effect, observed at 30 minutes and 1 hour after administration. Ivabradine did not prolong QTc or modify conductivity and refractoriness of the atrium, AV node, His-Purkinje system and ventricles, or repolarisation duration. These results confirm the action of ivabradine as a specific heart rate-lowering agent.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Current-dependent block of rabbit sino-atrial node I(f) channels by ivabradine.

"Funny" (f-) channels have a key role in generation of spontaneous activity of pacemaker cells and mediate autonomic control of cardiac rate; f-channels and the related neuronal h-channels are composed of hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channel subunits. We have investigated the block of f-channels of rabbit cardiac sino-atrial node cells by ivabradine, a novel heart rate-reducing agent. Ivabradine is an open-channel blocker; however, block is exerted preferentially when channels deactivate on depolarization, and is relieved by long hyperpolarizing steps. These features give rise to use-dependent behavior. In this, the action of ivabradine on f-channels is similar to that reported of other rate-reducing agents such as UL-FS49 and ZD7288. However, other features of ivabradine-induced block are peculiar and do not comply with the hypothesis that the voltage-dependence of block is entirely attributable to either the sensitivity of ivabradine-charged molecules to the electrical field in the channel pore, or to differential affinity to different channel states, as has been proposed for UL-FS49 (DiFrancesco, D. 1994. Pflugers Arch. 427:64-70) and ZD7288 (Shin, S.K., B.S. Rotheberg, and G. Yellen. 2001. J. Gen. Physiol. 117:91-101), respectively. Experiments where current flows through channels is modified without changing membrane voltage reveal that the ivabradine block depends on the current driving force, rather than voltage alone, a feature typical of block induced in inwardly rectifying K(+) channels by intracellular cations. Bound drug molecules do not detach from the binding site in the absence of inward current through channels, even if channels are open and the drug is therefore not "trapped" by closed gates. Our data suggest that permeation through f-channel pores occurs according to a multiion, single-file mechanism, and that block/unblock by ivabradine is coupled to ionic flow. The use-dependence resulting from specific features of I(f) block by ivabradine amplifies its rate-reducing ability at high spontaneous rates and may be useful to clinical applications.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Antianginal and antiischemic effects of ivabradine, an I(f) inhibitor, in stable angina: a randomized, double-blind, multicentered, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Heart rate reduction should benefit patients with chronic stable angina by improving myocardial perfusion and reducing myocardial oxygen demand. This study evaluated the antianginal and antiischemic effects of ivabradine, a new heart rate-lowering agent that acts specifically on the sinoatrial node. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 360 patients with a > or =3-month history of chronic stable angina were randomly assigned to receive ivabradine (2.5, 5, or 10 mg BID) or placebo for 2 weeks, followed by an open-label 2- or 3-month extension on ivabradine (10 mg BID) and a 1-week randomized withdrawal to ivabradine (10 mg BID) or placebo. Primary efficacy criteria were changes in time to 1-mm ST-segment depression and time to limiting angina during bicycle exercise (exercise tolerance tests), performed at trough of drug activity. In the per-protocol population (n=257), time to 1-mm ST-segment depression increased in the 5 and 10 mg BID groups (P<0.005); time to limiting angina increased in the 10 mg BID group (P<0.05). Deterioration in all exercise tolerance test parameters occurred in patients who received placebo during randomized withdrawal (all P<0.02) but not in those still receiving ivabradine. No rebound phenomena were observed on treatment cessation. CONCLUSIONS: Ivabradine produces dose-dependent improvements in exercise tolerance and time to development of ischemia during exercise. These results suggest that ivabradine, representing a novel class of antianginal drugs, is effective and safe during 3 months of use; longer-term safety requires additional assessment.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Effect of atenolol versus ivabradine on heart rate variability in patients of schizophrenia with clozapine-induced tachycardia: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A third of schizophrenia cases are resistant to antipsychotics, where clozapine is the only FDA-approved medication. Clozapine use is often limited by intolerable adverse effects. Persistent tachycardia occurs in approximately 25-54% patients receiving clozapine. Heart rate variability (HRV) is a non-invasive, clinically relevant marker of autonomic nervous system functioning. Atenolol and Ivabradine are usually prescribed for clozapine-induced tachycardia (CIT), although evidence guiding their optimal use remains limited. AIM: This study aimed to compare the effects of atenolol versus ivabradine on HRV in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) receiving clozapine. METHODS: This open-label randomised clinical trial, conducted at a tertiary-care center over 20 months, involved TRS patients on clozapine for more than three months and having persistent tachycardia. Twenty patients received atenolol 25mg once-daily, while twenty received ivabradine 5mg twice-daily for two months. The primary outcome was the change in the frequency domain of HRV, while the secondary outcomes were time-domains, central and peripheral blood pressure, pulse rate and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). RESULTS: While both drugs significantly reduced pulse-rates (atenolol: -20.56±13.00, p<0.001; ivabradine: -21.855±12.873, p<0.001). Within-group analysis showed that, the atenolol group had significant improvements in high-frequency [HF] power (p=0.048) and LF/HF ratio (p=0.044), along with a non-significant trend towards increased total power (p=0.053); no significant within-group changes were observed in the ivabradine group. CONCLUSION: No significant between-group differences in HRV parameters were established between atenolol and ivabradine. Ivabradine could be a viable option in patients where atenolol is either contraindicated or not tolerated. Future larger multicentric studies are needed for greater generalisability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06505668.

Humans↗

PubMed2004

I(f) channel inhibitor ivabradine lowers heart rate in mice with enhanced sympathoadrenergic activities.

1. Ivabradine selectively reduces heart rate (HR) by inhibiting the cardiac pacemaker I(f) current, thus prolonging the duration of spontaneous depolarization in the sinus node. The activity of ivabradine under conditions of enhanced sympathoadrenergic activity has been addressed by investigating the effects of repeated oral administration in mice with sympathoadrenergic activation due to either stress, cardiac-restricted overexpression of beta(2)-adrenergic receptors (beta(2)AR), or beta-agonist administration. HR and left ventricular fractional shortening (FS) were determined by echocardiography. 2. Initial experiments showed that the conscious restrained state was associated with stress-mediated sympathetic activation, while sympathetic withdrawal occurred under anaesthetized conditions. In wild-type mice, ivabradine reduced HR under both conscious and anaesthetized states, with a similar degree in absolute reduction under both states. FS was unchanged by the treatment. 3. Ivabradine was similarly effective in reducing HR in the beta(2)AR transgenic mice. Further, ivabradine at 10 mg kg(-1) day(-1) reduced the maximal HR increase in response to the beta-agonist isoproterenol, without modifying the response of contractile parameters. 4. These data indicate that oral administration of ivabradine in mice reduces HR while ventricular performance is maintained. This specific HR-reducing action of ivabradine is well preserved under conditions that are associated with significant activation of the sympathoadrenergic system.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Use-dependent inhibition of hHCN4 by ivabradine and relationship with reduction in pacemaker activity.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ivabradine, a specific and use-dependent I(f) inhibitor, exerts anti-ischaemic activity purely by reducing heart rate. The aim of this work was to characterize its effect on the predominant HCN channel isoform expressed in human sino-atrial nodes (hSAN), to determine its kinetics in HCN channels from multicellular preparations and rate-dependency of its action. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: RT-PCR analysis of the four HCN channel isoforms was carried out on RNAs from hSAN. Patch-clamp and intracellular recordings were obtained from CHO cells stably expressing hHCN4 and isolated SAN, respectively. Beating rate of rat isolated atria was followed using a transducer. KEY RESULTS: hHCN4 mRNAs were predominant in hSAN. Ivabradine induced a time-dependent inhibition of hHCN4 with an IC(50) of 0.5 microM. In rabbit SAN, ivabradine progressively reduced the frequency of action potentials: by 10% after 3 h at 0.1 microM, by 14% after 2 h at 0.3 microM and by 17% after 1.5 h at 1 microM. After 3h, ivabradine reduced the beating rate of rat right atria with an IC(30) of 0.2 microM. The onset of action of ivabradine was use-dependent rather than time-dependent with slower effects than caesium, an extracellular I (f) blocker. Ivabradine 3 microM decreased the frequency of action potentials in SAN from guinea-pig, rabbit and pig by 33%, 21% and 15% at 40 min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The use-dependent inhibition of hHCN4 current by ivabradine probably contributes to its slow developing effect in isolated SAN and right atria and to its increased effectiveness in species with rapid SAN activity.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2004

Long-term heart rate reduction induced by the selective I(f) current inhibitor ivabradine improves left ventricular function and intrinsic myocardial structure in congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Heart rate reduction (HRR) improves left ventricular (LV) filling, increases myocardial O2 supply, and reduces myocardial O2 consumption, which are all beneficial in congestive heart failure (CHF). However, the long-term effects of HRR on cardiac function and remodeling are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed, in rats with CHF, the effects of long-term HRR induced by the selective I(f) current inhibitor ivabradine (as food admix for 90 days starting 7 days after coronary artery ligation). To assess intrinsic modifications of LV tissue induced by long-term HRR, all parameters were reassessed 3 days after interruption of treatment. Ivabradine decreased heart rate over the 90-day treatment period (-18% versus untreated at 10 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)), without modifying blood pressure, LV end-diastolic pressure, or dP/dt(max/min). Ivabradine significantly reduced LV end-systolic but not end-diastolic diameter, which resulted in preserved cardiac output due to increased stroke volume. In the Langendorff preparation, ivabradine shifted LV systolic but not end-diastolic pressure-volume relations to the left. Ivabradine decreased LV collagen density and increased LV capillary density without modifying LV weight. Three days after interruption of treatment, the effects of ivabradine on LV geometry, shortening, and stroke volume persisted despite normalization of heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: In rats with CHF, long-term HRR induced by the selective I(f) inhibitor ivabradine improves LV function and increases stroke volume, preserving cardiac output despite the HRR. The improvement of cardiac function is related not only to the HRR per se but also to modifications in the extracellular matrix and/or function of myocytes as a consequence of long-term HRR.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Effects of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia and stunning.

We investigated the effects of the selective bradycardic agent ivabradine, an I(f) channel inhibitor, on exercise-induced ischemia and resulting myocardial stunning. Seven dogs were chronically instrumented to measure left ventricular (LV) wall thickening (Wth), aortic pressure and coronary blood flow (CBFv) (Doppler). Circumflex coronary artery stenosis was set up to suppress the increase in CBFv during a 10 min treadmill exercise. During exercise under saline, LVWth in the ischemic zone was depressed (-70 +/- 4%) and a prolonged myocardial stunning was subsequently observed. Infusion of ivabradine started before exercise significantly reduced heart rate (HR) at rest (-22 +/- 7%), during exercise (-33 +/- 4%) and throughout the recovery period (-21 +/- 2%). By reducing HR during exercise, ivabradine simultaneously improved LVWth compared with saline (14 +/- 1% versus 7 +/- 1%, respectively) and subendocardial perfusion (microspheres). This anti-ischemic effect was subsequently responsible for a strong decrease in the intensity and severity of myocardial stunning. All these beneficial effects were abolished when HR reduction during exercise was suppressed by atrial pacing. Interestingly, when ivabradine infusion was started after exercise, LVWth was still significantly enhanced and myocardial stunning strongly attenuated. This direct effect of ivabradine on the stunned myocardium disappeared when HR reduction was suppressed by atrial pacing at rest. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that ivabradine exerts an anti-ischemic effect that is responsible for subsequent protection against myocardial stunning. Furthermore, administration of ivabradine after the ischemic insult still improves LVWth of the stunned myocardium.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Properties of ivabradine-induced block of HCN1 and HCN4 pacemaker channels.

Ivabradine is a 'heart rate-reducing' agent able to slow heart rate, without complicating side-effects. Its action results from a selective and specific block of pacemaker f-channels of the cardiac sinoatrial node (SAN). Investigation has shown that block by ivabradine requires open f-channels, is use dependent, and is affected by the direction of current flow. The constitutive elements of native pacemaker channels are the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels, of which four isoforms (HCN1-4) are known; in rabbit SAN tissue HCN4 is expressed strongly, and HCN1 weakly. In this study we have investigated the blocking action of ivabradine on mouse (m) HCN1 and human (h) HCN4 channels heterologously expressed in HEK 293 cells. Ivabradine blocked both channels in a dose-dependent way with half-block concentrations of 0.94 microm for mHCN1 and 2.0 microm for hHCN4. Properties of block changed substantially for the two channels. Block of hHCN4 required open channels, was strengthened by depolarization and was relieved by hyperpolarization. Block of mHCN1 did not occur, nor was it relieved, when channels were in the open state during hyperpolarization; block required channels to be either closed, or in a transitional state between open and closed configurations. The dependence of block upon current flow was limited for hHCN4, and not significant for mHCN1 channels. In summary our results indicate that ivabradine is an 'open-channel' blocker of hHCN4, and a 'closed-channel' blocker of mHCN1 channels. The mode of action of ivabradine on the two channels is discussed by implementing a simplified version of a previously developed model of f-channel kinetics.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2003

Effect of graded heart rate reduction with ivabradine on myocardial oxygen consumption and diastolic time in exercising dogs.

Lowering heart rate reduces myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) and produces potent anti-ischemic effects. The development of selective heart rate-reducing agents represents an alternative approach to the use of beta-blockers. Therefore, our goal was to establish the dose-response curve of the effects of ivabradine (If channel inhibitor) on MVO2 and diastolic time. Seven conscious and chronically instrumented dogs were investigated during exercise at spontaneous and paced heart rate (250 beats/min) after administration of increasing doses of ivabradine (0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/kg i.v.). During exercise, ivabradine dose dependently and significantly reduced the exercise-induced tachycardia (-17, -21, and -32% at 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/kg, respectively, versus saline) without altering myocardial contractility nor mean ejection wall stress. A linear relationship between heart rate (HR) and MVO2 was demonstrated (MVO2 = 0.044 x HR - 1.4; r = 0.987). These effects of ivabradine on MVO2 were abolished by atrial pacing. Similarly, ivabradine dose dependently increased diastolic time without altering the inverse and non linear relationship between diastolic time and heart rate observed with saline. In conclusion, selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine dose dependently increases diastolic time and reduces MVO2 with a linear relationship between heart rate and MVO2. The lack of "on-off" pharmacological profile will predict the possibility of using a wide range of dose regimen.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

A single intravenous dose of ivabradine, a novel I(f) inhibitor, lowers heart rate but does not depress left ventricular function in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

This randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the effect of ivabradine, a novel heart rate-lowering agent, on echocardiographic indices of left ventricular (LV) systolic function in patients with regional (coronary artery disease) or global (cardiomyopathy) LV dysfunction. Patients were randomized on an unequal basis to receive ivabradine 0.25 mg/kg (n = 31) or placebo (n = 13) by intravenous infusion. Resting heart rate was reduced by a mean of 17.6 +/- 4.7% with ivabradine and 1.5 +/- 5.8% with placebo. The mean maximum decrease in LV ejection fraction was 0.2% with ivabradine and 1.7% with placebo. Fractional shortening and stroke volume were also fully preserved after ivabradine administration. Thus, a single intravenous dose of ivabradine produced a substantial reduction in resting heart rate without affecting LV function in patients with regional or global LV dysfunction.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Effects of Hypericum perforatum on ivabradine pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers: an open-label, pharmacokinetic interaction clinical trial.

The effects of the CYP3A4 inducer, Hypericum perforatum, on the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of ivabradine were assessed. An open-label, 2-period, nonrandomized, phase-I, pharmacokinetic interaction design was used. Twelve healthy volunteers received a single oral dose of ivabradine (10 mg) followed by H perforatum (300 mg orally, 3 times a day) for 14 days, combining the last dose with another single dose of ivabradine. Pharmacokinetic data for ivabradine (S16257) and its main active metabolite (S18982) prior to and after the administration of H perforatum were analyzed. After repeated administration of H perforatum, highest observed concentration in plasma (C(max)) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were significantly decreased for ivabradine (32.7 +/- 16.6 vs 15.4 +/- 7.0 ng/mL, P < .01; 114 +/- 39.1 vs 43.7 +/- 12.0 ng x h/mL, P < .01, respectively), and for S18982 (C(max), 6.8 +/- 3.7 vs 5.1 +/- 2.0 ng/mL, P < .05; AUC, 56.2 +/- 23.4 vs 38.3 +/- 25.1 ng x h/mL, P < .01). Tendencies toward shorter time to C(max) and lower apparent terminal half-life values were found. Pharmacokinetic results are consistent with an induction of ivabradine metabolism by H perforatum.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2006

The discovery of the selective I(f) current inhibitor ivabradine. A new therapeutic approach to ischemic heart disease.

Coronary artery disease is still a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the industrialized countries, despite the advances in pharmacological treatments, risk factor control and the beneficial effect of myocardial revascularization procedures. Medical anti-ischemic treatment is still essential in most patients, but should be improved in terms of efficacy and tolerance to ensure better prevention of mortality and improvement of the quality of life and symptom control. Since increased heart rate plays a major role in coronary artery disease, not only as a trigger of most of the ischemic episodes but also as an independent predictor of mortality, inhibition of the pacemaker I(f) current to induce a direct and selective decrease in heart rate represents an attractive therapeutic approach for coronary artery disease. The screening of original benzocycloalkane compounds, at Servier Research Institute, has led to the selection of ivabradine for clinical development. Preclinical data showed that ivabradine inhibits the I(f) current of the sinus node, induces a selective reduction in heart rate, both at rest and during exercise, preserves myocardial contractility, atrio-ventricular conduction and ventricular repolarization. Ivabradine prevents exercise-induced myocardial ischemia as effectively as a beta-blocker while offering better protection of regional myocardial contractility. These data have been confirmed in humans, and in particular, the anti-ischemic efficacy of ivabradine, at least as effective as a beta-blocker, in patients with stable angina. Large ongoing clinical trials aim to assess the therapeutic value of ivabradine to improve the prognosis of patients with stable coronary disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction by reducing mortality and the occurrence of major cardiovascular events.

Animals↗