PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Journalism”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1976

Primary journal selection using citations from an indexing service journal: a method and example from nursing literature.

Although serial literature is extremely important to a library collection, it is also the source of many problems. Specialty journal selection is difficult, particularly for the librarian of a small or intermediate-size library that is not in a position to develop or maintain an exhaustive or inclusive collection in a particular field or discipline. Steadily increasing journal costs and recent economic trends necessitate establishment or reexamination of a periodical collection policy. In this investigation, the technique used analyzes citations assigned to medical subject headings (MeSH) and subheadings by indexers who prepare the MEDLARS data base. Citations have been retrieved by exploiting the on-line nature of the MEDLARS data base. A four-year time period is used to identify specialty journals in the area of nursing. Results given include a separate rank-order listing arranged by decreasing frequency of productivity for each MeSH term searched. A composite listing is given for the 16,355 unique citations retrieved. The approach illustrated and data presented may be useful in establishing library policy for questions of periodical subscription and setting of priorities for binding and microform purchases. The purpose of the approach described is to predict collection demand with efficiency and economy.

Book Selection↗
PubMed1978

The fit between journals and theses.

The titles of a substantial sample of articles related to speech pathology and audiology over a period of 21 years were catalogued under one or more of 10 categories, e.g., normal audition, defective phonation, and the like. The titles of theses and dissertations in this field of six universities of Ohio over the same period were also catalogued. The articles appeared in 17 journals. The journals were treated as seven groups of "related" journals. The total output of journals was stable over the period studied; a "group" of journals tended to be consistent with itself over successive 3-year periods; the seven groups of journals tended to be unique, and not to replicate each other. The topics treated in the journals were accepted as a criterion for contemporaneousness. The student output of the universities varied in contemporaneousness from one school to another, ranging upward to r = 0.98 (10 categories). The overall correlation between the student and the journal outputs was r = 0.79.

Academic Dissertations as Topic↗
PubMed1992

Impact of the journal Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

The "impact" of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery was evaluated by bibliometric analysis. This technique considers the average frequency with which journal authors refer to articles published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. The impact of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery was compared with that of journals most commonly referred to within Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery as well as with that of journals read most commonly by Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery subscribers, such as the Annals of Plastic Surgery and the Journal of Hand Surgery (both American and British editions). The impact factor for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery was at least twice as great as for any other journal related to this surgical subspecialty. With regard to other surgical subspecialties, while the impact factor for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery was less than that of the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Urology, and Journal of Ophthalmology, it was greater than those for orthopedics, otolaryngology, hand surgery, and dermatologic surgery.

Bibliometrics↗
PubMed1992

Journal reading habits of dietitians.

Professional journals are an important resource for continuing education. To explore the journal reading habits of registered dietitians (RDs), we mailed a questionnaire to all RDs in the state of Delaware. Responses were received from 71 RDs (47%) who identified 44 professional journals they rely on for current, practical information. RDs who have journals available at work tend to devote more time to reading at work than at home. The Journal of The American Dietetic Association was clearly the professional journal read with most regularity by respondents. Articles of practical interest, followed by abstracts and book reviews, were sections most widely read. Lack of time was the primary reason RDs identified for not devoting adequate time to reading. Many attempted to resolve this problem through reliance on newsletters and less involvement with journal articles. Suggestions for improving and maximizing journal reading habits are offered.

Adult↗