PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Lacerations”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Massive haemorrhage from hepatic laceration with diaphragmatic laceration: a potential limitation of the FAST examination: case report.

This report describes the case of a multitrauma patient who had life-threatening intraabdominal hemorrhage with a diaphragmatic laceration. This hemorrhage remained undetected by serial focus assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination. The potential for intraabdominal blood to move through a diaphragmatic laceration to the pleural space may limit the development of hemoperitoneum, rendering the FAST examination misleading or producing a false-negative result. The use of the FAST examination is discussed along with its advantages and limitations.

Fatal Outcome↗

Risk of recurrence of anal sphincter lacerations.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the rate of recurrence of anal sphincter lacerations in subsequent pregnancies and analyze the risk factors associated with recurrent lacerations METHODS: Data were obtained from the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council, Division of In-Patient Statistics, regarding all cases of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations that occurred during a 2-year period (from January 1990 through December 1991). All subsequent pregnancies in this group of women over the next 10 years were identified, and the rate of recurrence of sphincter tears and risk factors for recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: The rate of anal sphincter lacerations was 7.31% (n = 18,888) during the first 2 years of study (1990-1991). In the next 10 years, these patients with prior lacerations were delivered of 16,152 pregnancies. Of these, 1,162 were by cesarean. Among the 14,990 subsequent vaginal deliveries, 864 (5.76%) had a recurrence of a third- or fourth-degree laceration. Women with prior fourth-degree lacerations had a much higher rate of recurrence than those with prior third-degree laceration (7.73% versus 4.69%). The rate for recurrent lacerations was significantly lower than the rate for initial lacerations (odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-1.4). Forceps delivery with episiotomy had the highest risk for recurrent laceration (17.7%, odds ratio 3.6, 95% CI 2.6-5.1), whereas vacuum use without episiotomy had the lowest risk (5.88%, odds ratio 1.0, 95% CI 0.6-1.7). CONCLUSION: Prior anal sphincter laceration does not appear to be a significant risk factor for recurrence of laceration. Operative vaginal delivery, particularly with episiotomy, increases the risk of recurrent laceration as it does for initial laceration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Adolescent↗

National trends in ED lacerations between 1992 and 2002.

OBJECTIVE: National estimates of the number of lacerations are based on the number of wounds cared for in the emergency department (ED). However, this number includes wounds other than lacerations. We estimated the number and characteristics of lacerations treated in the United States between 1992 and 2002. METHODS: The design used was secondary analysis of National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (a weighted sample of ED encounters). Encounters with a laceration recorded as 1 of the 3 diagnosis codes (870-897) of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification for the visit were included. Data collection included demographics, wound location, insurance status, procedures performed, type of practitioner, and pain severity. For data analysis, the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey databases for 1992 to 2002 were downloaded from its Web site and imported into SPSS 12.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Ill) for analysis. National estimates were obtained using assigned patient visit weights. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and group comparisons were performed with chi(2) tests using unweighted data. Rates were calculated using population data from the US census. RESULTS: There were 300715 patient encounters sampled from nearly 400 EDs resulting in an estimated 1.08 billion ED visits between 1992 and 2002. In the sample, 24755 patients (8.2%) had lacerations resulting in an estimated 90 million lacerations. Although the number of total ED visits increased annually during the study period (from 89.8 to 110.15 million), the number of lacerations declined (from 9.35 to 7.27 million). Lacerations were distributed on the upper extremity (35%), face (28%), trunk (14.5%), lower extremity (12.5%), and head and neck (10%). In 2002, about two thirds of the patients with a laceration were men, one third were children, and more than three fourths were white. Facial lacerations were more common in children (43% vs 20%; P < .01), whereas upper extremity lacerations were more common in adults (48% vs 20%, P < .001). The number of visits for lacerations was greatest on weekends, during the spring and summer, and between noon and 10 pm. Work-related injuries accounted for 11% of lacerations. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increase in the total number of ED visits over the last decade, the number of lacerations has declined, as is less than previously estimated.

Adolescent↗

Recurrent risk of anal sphincter laceration among women with vaginal deliveries.

OBJECTIVE: The first aim of this study was to estimate the impact of anal sphincter laceration during the first delivery on the risk of recurrence in the second delivery. The second aim was to estimate the absolute risk of anal sphincter laceration in the second delivery according to the history of anal sphincter laceration and birth weight. METHODS: In this population-based cohort study, the study sample comprised all women included in the Norwegian Medical Birth Registry with 2 consecutive singleton vaginal deliveries during the period 1967-1998 (n = 486,463). The impact of prior anal sphincter laceration on recurrent anal sphincter laceration was estimated as crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: Anal sphincter laceration during first delivery increased the risk for a sphincter laceration in the next delivery, (adjusted OR 4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8-4.8). Other risk factors were birth weight (adjusted OR 23.6, 95% CI 16.5-33.6, birth weight > 5,000 g versus birth weight < 3,000 grams), use of forceps (adjusted OR 5.1, 95% CI 4.3-6.0), use of vacuum (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7), and period of delivery (adjusted OR 4.3, 95% CI 3.7-5.0 for 1995-1998 versus 1967-1975). The absolute risks for anal sphincter laceration at second delivery for women with prior laceration were 1.3% (95% CI 0.4-3.2%) for birth weight less than 3,000 g and 23.3% (95% CI 11.8-38.6%) for birth weight more than 5,000 g. CONCLUSION: Only 10% of women with anal sphincter laceration at second delivery had a history of prior laceration. Prior anal sphincter laceration is associated with increased risk of laceration in second delivery, in particular in women who carry children with high birth weight. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.

Adult↗

Accidental fetal lacerations during cesarean delivery: experience in an Italian level III university hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence, type, location, and risk factors of accidental fetal lacerations during cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Total deliveries, cesarean deliveries, and neonatal records for documented accidental fetal lacerations were reviewed retrospectively in our level III university hospital. The gestational age, the presenting part of the fetus, the cesarean delivery indication, the type of incision, and the surgeon who performed the procedure were recorded. Cesarean deliveries were divided into scheduled, unscheduled, and emergency procedures. Fetal lacerations were divided into mild, moderate, and severe. Neonatal follow-up examinations regarding laceration sequelae were available for 6 months. RESULTS: Of 14926 deliveries, 3108 women were delivered by cesarean birth (20.82%). Neonatal records documented 97 accidental fetal lacerations. Of these accidental lacerations, 94 were mild; 2 were moderate, and 1 was severe. The overall rate of accidental fetal laceration per cesarean delivery was 3.12%; the accidental laceration rate in the cohort of fetuses was 2.46%. The crude odds ratios were 0.34 for scheduled procedures, 0.57 for unscheduled procedures, and 1.7 for emergency procedures. The risk for fetal accidental lacerations was higher in fetuses who underwent emergency cesarean birth and lower for unscheduled and scheduled cesarean births (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Fetal accidental laceration may occur during cesarean delivery; the incidence is significantly higher during emergency cesarean delivery compared with elective procedures. The patient should be counseled about the occurrence of fetal laceration during cesarean delivery to avoid litigation.

Cesarean Section↗