SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Lenograstim”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1997

A European phase II study of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (lenograstim) in the treatment of severe chronic neutropenia in children. Lenograstim Study Group.

UNLABELLED: We conducted a multicentre, open-label prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of lenograstim (human-identical glycosylated rHuG-CSF) in the prevention of infectious episodes of severe chronic neutropenia in 19 patients. The median follow up period was 54.6 months. Lenograstim was administered subcutaneously at a starting dosage of 5 microg/kg per day. Neutrophil recovery was achieved in all patients at induction dosages of 5 (n = 15), 10 (n = 2), 15 (n = 1) or 20 microg/kg per day (n = 1) and occurred at a median 7 days after therapy initiation. Alternate-day administration of double-dose lenograstim was feasible in 7 of 17 patients. Lenograstim treatment significantly (P = 0.012) reduced the incidence of treated infections and hospitalization for infection compared with the pre study period and significantly (P < 0.001) improved perceived health and disease-related symptoms. One patient discontinued treatment because of adverse events (pustulosis) initially related to lenograstim therapy but not confirmed. One patient withdrew by personal choice and was therefore only treated occasionally. One patient committed suicide after 45 months because of social difficulties. One patient was lost during follow up, and three patients presented with a spontaneous neutrophil recovery after 9, 15 and 27 months, respectively. Moderate and transient side-effects related to lenograstim were observed (thrombocytopenia, n = 2; splenomegaly, n = 2; moderate anaemia (without transfusion requirement), n = 5; bone pain, n = 2; increased of alkaline phosphatase, n = 5). CONCLUSION: Lenograstim produced a sustained neutrophil recovery in patients with severe chronic neutropenia, reduced the incidence and severity of infection, and improved quality of life.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed2004

A randomised study comparing peripheral blood progenitor mobilisation using intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide plus lenograstim with lenograstim alone.

We conducted a prospective randomised study to compare the efficiency of out-patient progenitor cell mobilisation using either intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (2 g/m(2)) and lenograstim at 5 micrograms/kg (Cyclo-G-CSF group, n=39) or lenograstim alone at 10 micrograms/kg (G-CSF group, n=40). The end points were to compare the impact of the two regimens on mobilisation efficiency, morbidity, time spent in hospital, the number of apheresis procedures required and engraftment kinetics. Successful mobilisation was achieved in 28/40 (70%) in the G-CSF group vs 22/39 (56.4%) for Cyclo-G-CSF (P=0.21). The median number of CD34+ cells mobilised was 2.3 x 10(6)/kg and 2.2 x 10(6)/kg for G-CSF and cyclo-G-CSF arms following a median of two apheresis procedures. Nausea and vomiting and total time spent in the hospital during mobilisation were significantly greater after Cyclo-G-CSF (P<0.05). Rapid neutrophil and platelet engraftment was achieved in all transplanted patients in both groups. In conclusion, G-CSF at 10 micrograms/kg was as efficient at mobilising progenitor cells as a combination of cyclophosphamide and G-CSF with reduced hospitalisation and side effects and prompt engraftment. When aggressive in-patient cytoreductive regimens are not required to both control disease and generate progenitor cells, the use of G-CSF alone appears preferable to combination with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed2000

Efficacy of a new formulation of lenograstim (recombinant glycosylated human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) containing gelatin for the treatment of neutropenia after consolidation chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

The efficacy and safety of a new formulation of lenograstim (recombinant glycosylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) prepared by switching the stabilizer from human serum albumin (HSA) to gelatin was investigated for the treatment of neutropenia after consolidation chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The results obtained in the study using the gelatin-containing formulation (gelatin-lenograstim) were retrospectively compared to those obtained from a placebo-controlled double-blind randomized study (AML-DBT) using the HSA-containing formulation (HSA-lenograstim). The median time of neutrophil recovery to > or = 1000/mm3 was significantly shorter in the gelatin-lenograstim group (14 days) than in the placebo group (21 days, P = .0001), and there was no significant difference between the gelatin-lenograstim group and the HSA-lenograstim group (14.5 days of AML-DBT, P = .5462). The incidences of febrile neutropenia were significantly reduced in the gelatin-lenograstim group (24/43, 55.8%) compared to the placebo group (58/64, 90.6%, P < .0001). The incidence of fever and antibiotic use was also significantly lower in the gelatin-lenograstim group (69.8% and 83.7%, respectively) than in the placebo group (92.2%, P = .0034, and 96.9%, P = .0285, respectively). However, between the 2 groups there were no differences in the number of patients who had infectious episodes. No serious adverse drug reactions ascribed to gelatin-lenograstim were encountered. These results demonstrate that gelatin-lenograstim exerted beneficial effects in the acceleration of neutrophil recovery and in the reduction of fever, febrile neutropenia, and antibiotic use, and its efficacy was equivalent to HSA-lenograstim. Therefore, we concluded that the gelatin-lenograstim formulation, which offers no risk of virus contamination and can be stored at room temperature, is more beneficial than the HSA-lenograstim formulation.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2000

Lenograstim: an update of its pharmacological properties and use in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and related clinical settings.

UNLABELLED: Lenograstim is the glycosylated recombinant form of human granulocyte colony stimulating factor. The drug is used to reduce the risk of life-threatening infection in patients with neutropenia, particularly after cytotoxic chemotherapy. Lenograstim accelerates neutrophil recovery significantly after chemotherapy, with beneficial effects on clinical end-points such as incidence of laboratory-confirmed infection and length of hospital stay. Chemotherapy dose intensity has also been increased in patients receiving lenograstim, notably those with breast or small cell lung cancer, although improvements in tumour response and survival have not been demonstrated. Lenograstim also assists neutrophil recovery in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation, and stimulates the production of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for autologous transfusion after aggressive chemotherapy. Lenograstim also mobilises CD34+ cells more efficiently in unit dose terms than filgrastim and has been used successfully to mobilise PBSCs from healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation. Randomised trials have shown increases in rates of disease remission after lenograstim therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia, with no evidence of stimulation of malignant blasts. The drug has also shown potential in the mobilisation of nonmalignant PBSCs for autotransplantation in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Other studies show efficacy of lenograstim in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, aplastic anaemia, in children with severe chronic neutropenia and in the reversal of neutropenia related to antiviral therapy in patients with AIDS, although data are not extensive. Cost analyses of lenograstim have been carried out from a hospital perspective, although results have been inconclusive. Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit data are lacking at present. Lenograstim is well tolerated, with bone pain and injection site reactions being reported most frequently in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Lenograstim has been confirmed as a valuable adjunct to minimise the haematological toxicity of myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients with malignant disease. The drug also enhances neutrophil recovery in patients undergoing stem cell rescue, and assists PBSC mobilisation. Data indicate clinical benefit with lenograstim in myeloid disorders, with no evidence of malignant blast cell proliferation. Further studies are required to assess more fully the pharmacoeconomic implications of the use of lenograstim and other recombinant growth factors, to provide more data on the efficacy of the drug in the management of disease-related neutropenia, and to clarify fully its position relative to filgrastim.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed1997

Placebo-controlled phase III study of lenograstim (glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: factors influencing chemotherapy administration. Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte.

The purpose of this study was to, assess the efficacy of glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (lenograstim) in the prevention of neutropenia and infection in patients receiving dose-intensive chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). A second objective was to determine clinical predicators of delay to cytotoxic chemotherapy administration. One hundred-sixty two patients with intermediate- or high-grade NHL and at least one poor prognostic factor received a total of 4 cycles of the LNH-84-regimen every 2 weeks, with an open randomization to treatment with anthracyclines. Patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous lenograstim 5 micrograms/kg/day (n = 82) or placebo (n = 80) from day 6 to day 13 of each cycle. The incidence of severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 0.5 x 10(9)/L) was reduced in the lenograstim group compared with placebo (52% vs 75%). A significant reduction (p < 0.001) in the median duration of ANC < 0.5 x 10(9)/L was also observed in patients treated with lenograstim during each cycle of chemotherapy (0-1 day vs 2-4 days in placebo recipients). Fever occurred in 66 patients in each treatment group. Thirty-four percent of placebo recipients had documented infections during ANC < 1.0 x 10(9)/L compared with 18.5% of lenograstim-treated patients (p < 0.05). Infections of > or = 2 severity were significantly less frequent (p = 0.001) among lenograstim recipients compared with placebo (25 vs 49). The most common adverse events among lenograstim recipients were headache, mild bone pain and injection site reactions. Although lenograstim significantly increased (p = 0.0001) relative dose intensity compared with placebo (93% vs 80%), no difference in CR rate (67% vs 71%) or 3-year survival (63% vs 55%) was observed. The results of this study suggest that patients treated with a chemotherapy regimen that induces severe neutropenia can benefit from treatment with lenograstim. Furthermore, lenograstim permits treatment to be delivered at full dose intensity at 2 week intervals, even in patients with bone marrow involvement, and may permit further dose escalation of the chemotherapeutic regimen used.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Clinical benefits of lenograstim in patients with neutropenia due to chemotherapy for multiple myeloma (MM).

The object of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF; lenograstim) after combination chemotherapy consisting of ranimustine, vindesine, melphalan and prednisolone (MCNU-VMP). One hundred thirty-nine consecutive patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) were allocated at random to a lenograstim group (n = 70) or a placebo group (n = 69). Patients were treated with two cycles of MCNU-VMP, and either lenograstim (2 microg/kg daily, s.c.) or placebo was administered from the day neutrophils decreased to less than 1.000/microl and was discontinued when neutrophils exceeded 5,000/microl. The median duration of neutropenia (neutrophils under 1,000/microl) was significantly shorter for the lenograstim group than the placebo group (2 days vs 9 days in the first cycle; 1 day vs 13 days in the second cycle). The incidence of febrile neutropenia in the first cycle was significantly lower in the lenograstim group than in the placebo group (9.2% vs 30.4%). No life-threatening infections were observed in either group. The two cycles of MCNU-VMP therapy were completed in 90.8% of the patients, and a higher average relative dose intensity (ARDI; 0.94) was achieved in the lenograstim group. The tumor response rate of the lenograstim group (57.8%) was higher than that of the placebo group (43.1%), but the difference was not statistically significant (chi2 = 2.634, df = 1, P = 0.105). Lenograstim was well tolerated, and no unexpected adverse events occurred. Lenograstim proved effective in controlling chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in MM patients under MCNU-VMP therapy.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed1995

Lenograstim. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in neutropenia and related clinical settings.

Lenograstim is a recombinant glycosylated human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF) which principally regulates the formation and function of neutrophils. Like other colony-stimulating factors (CSFs), lenograstim has been developed for the prevention and treatment of iatrogenic and disease-related neutropenic conditions. In phase III clinical studies, prophylactic administration of lenograstim shortened the duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with nonmyelogenous cancers who received standard-dose chemotherapy or myeloablative regimens followed by bone marrow transplantation (BMT). A decrease in the incidence of infection after standard regimens and fewer days with infectious and febrile neutropenic episodes during recovery from BMT occurred concomitantly with the amelioration of neutropenia. In each setting, the decrease in morbidity was associated with shorter hospitalisation times and reduced administration of parenteral antibacterial agents. As with another rHuG-CSF, filgrastim, bone pain (non-serious) was the most common adverse reaction to lenograstim therapy. This occurred in 13% of lenograstim recipients and 5% of placebo recipients treated for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia with standard regimens. Lenograstim may facilitate dose optimisation and permit limited dose intensification of standard chemotherapy. Furthermore, the drug, used alone or in combination with chemotherapy, is effective in mobilising peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for subsequent reinfusion. The latter is a promising technique which may supplement or ultimately replace BMT for stem cell rescue after myeloablative chemotherapy. However, it has yet to be established whether the dose intensification achievable with lenograstim and/or stem cell rescue has a material effect on relapse-free and survival times. Preliminary data suggest that lenograstim is effective in increasing the neutrophil count in patients with severe chronic neutropenia (Kostmann's syndrome), as well as patients with AIDS or AIDS-related complex with zidovudine-induced neutropenia. Thus, lenograstim, like other CSFs, is a valuable adjunct to cytotoxic chemotherapy for the treatment of nonmyelogenous cancers, including myeloablative regimens followed by stem cell rescue with BMT and/or PBPC infusion. Future clinical experience is likely to confirm the usefulness of the drug in the management of disease-related neutropenia, myeloid disorders and neutropenia in patients with AIDS.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2004

Low-dose lenograstim to enhance engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation: a prospective randomized evaluation of two different fixed doses.

BACKGROUND: G-CSF is used to enhance hematopoietic recovery after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), but the optimal dose of G-CSF during engraftment has not been established. The medical cost of ASCT is a serious financial burden in developing countries, and G-CSF is the most costly drug used in this procedure. We evaluated whether a lower, vial-size fitted dose of lenograstim is clinically equivalent to a higher fixed dose. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective randomized study was performed on 33 patients (11 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, 8 multiple myeloma, 14 breast cancer) undergoing ASCT. Patients were randomly administered 100 micro g or 250 micro g lenograstim daily starting on the next day of ASCT, with a minimum infusion of 3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. RESULTS: For both lenograstim doses, median time to neutrophil engraftment was 9 days and median time to PLT engraftment was 11 days. Episodes of clinically documented infections were 10 per 379 patient-days in the 100 microg per day group and 10 per 320 patient-days in the 250 microg per day group. There were no between-group differences in requirements for transfusion of RBCs or PLTs. Duration of hospitalization was 16 days for the 100 microg per day group and 17 days for the 250 microg per day group. Daily lenograstim dose per patient's body weight and total amount of lenograstim used during ASCT were both significantly lower in the 100 microg per day group. CONCLUSION: Administration of 100 microg per day of lenograstim showed comparable clinical efficacy to 250 microg per day lenograstim for immediate hematopoietic recovery after ASCT. Use of the lower dose was associated with lower overall lenograstim usage and lower cost.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1994

Economic evaluation of lenograstim for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with small cell lung cancer.

The impact of lenograstim, recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, on healthcare costs was evaluated on the basis of the results of a clinical trial of the drug in patients receiving VICE (vincristine, ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide) chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The use of lenograstim resulted in a significant (p < 0.03) increase in the cumulative chemotherapy dose intensity (125% with lenograstim vs 118% without). Lenograstim was found to have no significant impact on the use of healthcare resources for administration of chemotherapy, chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, and associated infections. The cost of healthcare for the lenograstim group (excluding lenograstim acquisition costs) was 700 pounds higher per patient than that for the group not treated with lenograstim (95% CI -930 pounds to 2300 pounds). The use of lenograstim to intensify the chemotherapy dose is likely to increase the costs of treatment for SCLC. However, any increased costs need to be balanced against the potential cost savings associated with the possible long term benefits resulting from chemotherapy dose intensification.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed2001

A randomized, crossover comparison of standard-dose versus low-dose lenograstim in the prophylaxis of post-chemotherapy neutropenia.

The aim of this trial was to compare the severity of neutropenia, the frequency of hospital admission for fever or infection, and the use of antibiotics among patients treated with a standard dose of lenograstim (263 microg/day of Euprotin) and others treated with half of this dose (131.5 microg/day) and the cost-effectiveness of each of the two doses. In this single-center study, 44 patients with solid tumors, who were all receiving standard-dose chemotherapy regimens following previous neutropenia or were at high risk of neutropenia, were randomized to receive lenograstim at a dose of 263 microg or 131.5 microg daily in the first cycle and then crossed over to the alternate dose for the following cycle. Crossover to the alternate dose was repeated for patients who received more than two cycles. Lenograstim was administered from day +5 to day +14. The absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was assessed on days +5, +8, +12 and +15 of each cycle. Statistical analysis was performed using a general lineal model for repeated samples. In all, 120 cycles were administered, with a median of 3 cycles (range 1-6). Only 4 patients received only 1 cycle. No statistically significant difference (P=0.324) in ANC was observed between standard-dose (mean 5.3, 10.7, 8.3, 11.4 x 10(9)/l) and low-dose (5.0, 8.6, 5.4, 7.5 x 10(9)/l) treatment at days +5, +8, +12 and + 15. Neutropenia grade III-IV was more common in patients receiving the low than in those receiving the standard dose of lenograstim (20% vs 12%, respectively), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.1). The incidence of fever and frequency of hospital admission were not affected by the dose of lenograstim: 3 patients presented with fever with the standard dose (all of those were admitted to hospital) and 2 patients with the low dose (1 was admitted). ANC in both groups (standard and low doses) was independent of chemotherapy line (first versus second or more). Lenograstim at a dose of 131.5 microg/day is as effective as the standard dose in limiting the severity of neutropenia and in preventing episodes of fever and hospital admissions after chemotherapy for solid tumors. The lower dose of lenograstim is cost-effective in neutropenia prophylaxis. Starting its administration on day +5 reduces costs while maintaining efficacy.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed2000

Lenograstim for the treatment of neutropenia in patients receiving ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus infection: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in AIDS patients.

This phase IIa, randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to determine the dose of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (lenograstim) suitable for use in AIDS patients. The study was conducted at 27 European AIDS/HIV centres, and recruited 69 AIDS patients with an initial episode or relapse of cytomegalovirus infection (neurological site excluded) and an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < or = 1.0 x 10(9)/L upon diagnosis or between days 1 and 12 of ganciclovir (GCV) treatment. The patients were randomised to placebo (n = 14) or one of four lenograstim arms: 150 microg/m2/d (the standard onco-haematology dose, n = 13) or 100 (n = 13), 50 (n = 15), or 25 microg/m2/d (n = 14). In all groups, the planned dose of GCV was 10 mg/kg/d for 21 d. Median ANC at weeks 2 and 3 was significantly higher in each lenograstim group than in the placebo group (p = 0.05). At week 3, median ANC (x 10(9)/L) was 0.7 in the placebo group, compared with 6.0, 7.4, 4.5, and 2.0 in the 150, 100, 50, and 25 microg2/d lenograstim groups, respectively. Median ANC was not significantly different between the 150, 100, and 50 microg/m2/d lenograstim groups at any time point, but significantly higher in the 50 than in the 25 microg/m2/d group at weeks 2 (p = 0.05) and 3 (p = 0.02). Lenograstim was generally well tolerated, leading to no severe adverse events. In conclusion, lenograstim 50 microg/m2/d is suitable for the treatment of ganciclovir-induced neutropenia and is safe. These results should help the physician choose an optimal and cost-efficient regimen for patients with AIDS-related neutropenia when rHuG-CSF support is indicated.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

PubMed1999

Pharmacokinetics of glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (lenograstim) in healthy male volunteers.

AIMS: The aim of this open, randomised, crossover, parallel-group study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and neutrophil responses of lenograstim when administered subcutaneously (s.c.) and intravenously (i.v.). METHODS: A total of 27 healthy male volunteers was recruited. Lenograstim doses (0.5, 2, 5, or 10 microg kg(-1)) were administered s.c. or i.v. once-daily for 5 days, and then, after a 10-day washout period, vice versa for a further 5 days. Lenograstim concentrations and absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) were measured predosing and postdosing on days 1 and 5. RESULTS: Maximum serum concentrations of lenograstim were higher following i.v. dosing (mean 5.2-185.5 vs 0.7-30.0 ng ml(-1) after s.c. dosing on day 1) and attained sooner (median 0.5-0.8 vs 4.7-8.7 h on day 1). However, apparent elimination half-lives of lenograstim were longer following s.c. dosing (mean 2.3-3.3 vs 0.8-1.2 h after i.v. dosing on days 1 and 5). ANCs increased in a dose-dependent manner with both routes of lenograstim, but more prolonged rises and higher ANC peaks were attained following s.c. doses. ANCs peaked on day 6 following 5 microg kg(-1) s.c. doses (mean peak=26.3x10(9) cells l(-1)), but on day 2 after 5 microg kg(-1) i.v. doses (mean peak = 12.4 x 10(9) cells l(-1)). Irrespective of route, the most common adverse events were headaches and back/spine pain; at doses of up to 5 microg kg(-1) these were mild and generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: While supporting the use of both s.c. and i.v. administered lenograstim to treat neutropenia, these results demonstrate that neutrophil responses are more sustained and prolonged with the s.c. route.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed1994

Economic evaluation of lenograstim (glycosylated rHuG-CSF) in the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer for Germany and Italy.

Data from a French placebo-controlled double-blind trial in 120 female patients treated with high dose fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (HD-FEC) chemotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer were used to assess the economic impact of adjunctive lenograstim therapy. The analysis compared direct costs of treatment, with or without lenograstim, with reference to the Social Security (Germany) or to the National Health Service (Italy). Resource utilisation differed between the 2 treatment groups. The lenograstim group reported 32% fewer antibiotic therapy days (9.8 days vs 14.6; p = 0.01) and 24% fewer inpatient days for any reason other than chemotherapy (7.4 'excess' days vs 9.8). By reducing infection-related morbidity associated with a high dose chemotherapy regimen, lenograstim decreased treatment costs by DM 1794 and ItL 1.2 million, excluding the cost of lenograstim itself. Since lenograstim patients reported fewer chemotherapy delays (16.4 vs 30.5%) and, hence, benefited from 1.2 (p = 0.04) more chemotherapy days, the related cost was DM 1519 and ItL 0.9 million higher than for the placebo group. This cost difference would be expected to be smaller if the placebo group patients had been followed until completion of their full chemotherapy regimen. Assuming that the costs of chemotherapy were the same for both groups, the direct cost saving for the lenograstim group would be 30% in Germany and 34% in Italy.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed1994

Economic analysis of lenograstim in the correction of neutropenia following chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

A prospective economic analysis of lenograstim and placebo was performed as part of a randomised double-blind trial in 162 patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The primary clinical end-point was the percentage of patients experiencing > or = 1 documented infection in each treatment group. The cost of hospitalisation and the cost of medical services used were the primary economic end-points. Economic analysis was based on the French Hospital perspective. Over the 56-day study period, patients in the placebo group received more days of inpatient intravenous (8.9 vs 5.3 days; p < 0.01) and oral (5.3 vs 4.2 days) antibiotic therapy than those in the lenograstim group. This difference was due to a higher rate of documented infection in the placebo group. Patients treated with placebo also spent more days in hospital for reasons other than administration of chemotherapy (18.5 vs 14.4; p < 0.05). The number of days of chemotherapy was significantly greater in the lenograstim group than in the placebo group (19.4 vs 17.5; p < 0.001) because of shorter delays between chemotherapy cycles in the lenograstim group. The use of lenograstim to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with NHL was associated with a reduction in total direct medical costs (excluding the cost of lenograstim) of FF7297 as a result of reduced patient morbidity. Furthermore, the higher rate of completion of chemotherapy in the lenograstim group may lead to better long term survival; this observation deserves further clinical investigation.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed1995

A single-blind, randomised, vehicle-controlled dose-finding study of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (lenograstim) in patients undergoing chemotherapy for solid cancers and lymphoma.

This study evaluated the effect of glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF; lenograstim) on neutrophil granulocyte counts and on cells of other haematopoietic lineages in 66 patients with solid cancer or lymphoma who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Beginning 1 day after completion of chemotherapy, patients received lenograstim (at dosages of 0.5, 2, 5 or 10 micrograms/kg) or vehicle subcutaneously once daily for 14 consecutive days. Compared with vehicle, lenograstim significantly accelerated neutrophil recovery after chemotherapy in a dose-dependent manner. Mean neutrophil counts recovered to > 1.0 x 10(9) cells/l by day 13 in the vehicle group compared with days 11, 10, 8 and 7 in the 0.5, 2, 5 and 10 micrograms/kg lenograstim groups, respectively. Doses of 0.5 and 2 micrograms/kg of lenograstim had a significant effect on the duration of neutropenia (< 1.0 x 10(9) cells/l), the area under the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) curve and the time to ANC nadir. The dose of 5 micrograms/kg additionally decreased the total area of neutropenia and gave the narrowest range of values for all neutrophil parameters, while the 10 micrograms/kg dose brought no added benefit. A dose-response effect of lenograstim on time to neutrophil recovery was observed both for patients who received chemotherapy on a single day (n = 35) and for those who received chemotherapy over several days (n = 29). Based on these findings, a dose of 5 micrograms/kg/day was chosen for further trials.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed1994

Placebo-controlled phase III trial of lenograstim in bone-marrow transplantation.

Haemopoietic growth factors are accepted as accelerating haemopoietic recovery after bone-marrow grafting, yet no large randomised trials have been published that convincingly show benefit. Lenograstim (glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) was given to 315 patients after bone-marrow transplantation in a prospective randomised placebo-controlled multicentre trial. 1 day after bone-marrow infusion, 163 patients received lenograstim 5 micrograms/kg per day by 30-min infusion, and 152 patients received placebo daily for 28 days or until neutrophil recovery. 137 patients had lymphoma, 35 myeloma, 85 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and 58 a solid tumour. Patients were stratified by age and by type of bone-marrow transplantation (BMT). Neutrophil recovery to above 10(9)/L for 3 consecutive days was seen earlier in lenograstim-treated patients (16 vs 27 days, p < 0.001). Time to neutrophil recovery above 0.5 x 10(9)/L was reduced (14 vs 20 days, p < 0.001). The difference was significant both in autograft (20 vs 14 days, p < 0.001) and allograft (20 vs 14 days, p < 0.01) patients, in children (20 vs 13 days, p < 0.001), and adults. Lenograstim-treated patients had fewer days of infection, and of antibiotic administration, and also spent less time in hospital. However, clinical and microbiological sepsis was similar in both groups. There was no significant toxicity ascribed to lenograstim. Survival was the same at days 100 and 365. In patients undergoing autologous or allogeneic BMT for neoplastic disease, lenograstim significantly reduced duration of neutropenia and led to earlier hospital discharge.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed1997

Lenograstim administration to HLA-identical donor-recipient pairs to accelerate marrow recovery post-transplant.

In an attempt to accelerate marrow recovery after HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation, the donors of 12 patients with haematological malignancy were given recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF; lenograstim; Granocyte) 5 micrograms/kg/day for seven doses prior to marrow harvest. All 12 recipients also received lenograstim 5 micrograms/kg/day from the day of transplant until their neutrophil count was 1.0 x 10(9)/1. In addition to lenograstim post-transplant and lenograstim-stimulated donor bone marrow the first six recipients also received donor peripheral blood stem cells that had been enriched for CD34+ stem/progenitor cells and T cell depleted on an immune absorption column (cohort 1). The second six patients (cohort 2) received lenograstim post-transplant and lenograstim-stimulated donor marrow only. All 12 patients showed a marked elevation of their circulating white blood cell count (predominantly neutrophils) on day 1 post-transplant. Compared to carefully matched historical control patients the rate of neutrophil engraftment was significantly accelerated in both patient cohorts and platelet engraftment was accelerated in cohort 2.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed1995

Efficacy of lenograstim on hematologic tolerance to MAID chemotherapy in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma and consequences on treatment dose-intensity.

PURPOSE: This two-arm, double-blind, randomized trial was conducted to determine the effects of lenograstim, a glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHu-G-CSF), on the hematologic tolerance of patients with sarcoma treated with mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin (MAID) chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with metastatic or locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma were, following the first cycle of a combination with doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, ifosfamide 7.5 g/m2, and dacarbazine 900 mg/m2, ifosfamide 7.5 g/m2, and dacarbazine 900 mg/m2 given on days 1 to 3, randomized to receive either lenograstim 5 micrograms/kg/d by once-daily injection from day 4 to day 13, or its vehicle. For subsequent cycles, 28 patients continued on the same chemotherapy and lenograstim was systematically given as prophylactic treatment in an open manner. RESULTS: Following the first cycle of MAID, the duration of neutropenia was reduced in patients who received lenograstim as compared with those who received placebo, with a median duration of neutropenia ( < 0.5 x 10(9)/L neutrophils) of 0 days (range, 0 to 3) and 5 days (range, 0 to 10), respectively (P < .001). All patients who received lenograstim had recovered at least 1 x 10(9)/L neutrophils (polymorphonuclear lymphocytes [PMN]) on day 14, compared with only one of 26 in the placebo group (P < .001). The median time to recover this neutrophil level was 12 days (range, 10 to 13) and 17 days (range, 14 to 21), respectively (P < .001). Neutropenic fever occurred in five (23%) and 15 (58%) patients respectively (P = .02). Twenty-eight patients received at least two cycles (median, four) of MAID at the same dose. Toxicity remained constant across all treatment cycles. A progressive increase in thrombocytopenia was noted, with median platelet nadirs of 102 x 10(9)/L at cycle 2 and 19.5 x 10(9)/L at cycle 6, but did not result in significant treatment modifications. Consequently, median relative dose-intensities remained greater than 0.95 for up to six consecutive MAID cycles. CONCLUSION: Lenograstim significantly improved hematologic tolerance in patients treated with the MAID chemotherapy regimen and, therefore, allowed optimal adhesion to the theoretic doses planned for up to six cycles. Whether such an optimization in relative dose-intensity will result in an improvement of treatment efficacy remains to be determined.

Adult↗