SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Lenvatinib”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Durvalumab and tremelimumab, with or without lenvatinib, combined with transarterial chemoembolisation in participants with embolisation-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma (EMERALD-3): a global, randomised, open-label, sponsor-blinded, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), a standard treatment for embolisation-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), induces tumour immune responses. Single tremelimumab regular interval durvalumab (STRIDE) is a standard treatment in advanced HCC. In this phase 3 trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of STRIDE, with or without lenvatinib, plus TACE, in participants with embolisation-eligible HCC. METHODS: EMERALD-3 is a phase 3, randomised, open-label, sponsor-blinded study, conducted at 177 medical sites in 21 countries. Eligible participants were 18 years or older (aged ≥21 years in Egypt or Singapore) at screening and had confirmed HCC (by imaging or histopathologically from biopsy specimen, surgery, or both) not amenable to curative surgery, curative ablation, or transplantation but amenable to TACE. Participants had Child-Pugh class A liver function, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and at least one measurable target intrahepatic lesion per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE, STRIDE plus TACE, or TACE until each group reached its preplanned enrolment target of 175 participants. After the STRIDE plus TACE group reached its enrolment target, randomisation was adjusted to continue in a 1:1 ratio between the STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE group and TACE group until approximately 275 participants were enrolled in each of these two groups. Randomisation used a centrally assigned interactive response technology system, stratified by region, baseline tumour burden, and previous palliative embolisation. In the STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE group, on the first day, participants were given 300 mg tremelimumab intravenously, followed by 1500 mg durvalumab plus oral lenvatinib (8 mg for <60 kg bodyweight or 12 mg for ≥60 kg bodyweight); participants then received 1500 mg durvalumab every 4 weeks plus once-daily lenvatinib for up to 36 cycles. In the STRIDE plus TACE group, participants were given 300 mg tremelimumab and 1500 mg durvalumab intravenously on the first day, followed by 1500 mg durvalumab every 4 weeks. The technique and number of TACE procedures were at the investigators' discretion, with the first procedure administered at least 7 days after the first dose of durvalumab in the two investigation treatment groups and within 7 days of random allocation in the TACE group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE versus TACE. Key secondary endpoints were overall survival for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE versus TACE and progression-free survival and overall survival for STRIDE plus TACE versus TACE. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05301842), with enrolment completed. FINDINGS: From March 28, 2022, to Nov 20, 2024, 1124 participants were screened. The full analysis set comprised 760 participants, who were randomly allocated to STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE (n=293), STRIDE plus TACE (n=175), or TACE (n=292). 633 (83%) participants were male and 127 (17%) were female; 548 (72%) were Asian. At the first data cutoff (Sept 2, 2025); the overall median follow-up for progression-free survival was 10·0 months (IQR 4·6-17·2); median follow-up for progression-free survival was 11·0 months (IQR 4·8-18·4) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE and 8·3 months (4·1-15·5) for TACE. Median progression-free survival was 13·0 months (95% CI 12·2-16·7) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE versus 9·8 months (8·0-11·4) for TACE (HR 0·70 [95% CI 0·57-0·86]; p=0·0007). At the second data cutoff (Feb 23, 2026) and a median follow-up for overall survival of 24·6 months (IQR 16·5-31·5) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE and 22·9 months (14·9-30·2) for TACE, median overall survival was 39·5 months (95% CI 34·1-not reached) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE and 34·7 months (28·8-not reached) for TACE (HR 0·84 [95% CI 0·65-1·09]; p=0·18). At this data cutoff, median progression-free survival was 12·9 months (95% CI 10·2-15·9) for STRIDE plus TACE and 8·1 months (6·5-10·2) for the first 175 participants randomised to TACE (HR 0·71 [95% CI 0·56-0·91]), with median follow-up of 10·3 months (IQR 4·6-23·7) for STRIDE plus TACE and 7·7 months (3·0-18·5) for the first 175 participants randomly allocated to TACE. The most common adverse events of maximum grade 3 or 4 were hypertension (34 [12%] of 287) for STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE, post-embolisation syndrome and anaemia (ten [6%] of 175 each) for STRIDE plus TACE, and post-embolisation (17 [6%] of 290) for TACE. 184 (64%) participants receiving STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE, 89 (51%) receiving STRIDE plus TACE, and 68 (23%) receiving TACE had serious adverse events. Treatment-related adverse events with an outcome of death during the treatment-emergent period occurred in seven (2%) of 287 participants who received STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE (two for myocarditis; and one each for hepatic failure, haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, septic shock, cardiac failure, and unknown cause), none of 175 participants who received STRIDE plus TACE, and two (1%) of 290 participants who received TACE (one each for acute myocardial infarction and unknown cause). INTERPRETATION: STRIDE plus lenvatinib plus TACE showed a statistically significant progression-free survival improvement versus TACE. These findings support a STRIDE-based regimen as a potential new treatment option for people with embolisation-eligible HCC; additional follow-up is being conducted for final analysis of overall survival across treatment groups. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

Adult↗

PubMed2025

Genome-wide CRISPR Screening Identifies NFκB and c-MET as Druggable Targets to Sensitize Lenvatinib Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the dominant form of liver cancer, is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Sorafenib and lenvatinib have long been the 2 limited options of first-line treatments for patients with unresectable advanced HCC. However, the single-drug treatment strategy only shows modest survival benefit, mostly because of the survival ability of cancer cells to activate alternative pathways for compensation. In this study, we aim to identify druggable targets contributing to lenvatinib resistance and evaluate the efficacy of combining respective inhibitors and lenvatinib on HCC. METHODS: Genome-scale clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 knockout library screening was applied on the vehicle group and lenvatinib treatment group. Identified druggable candidates were validated individually on HCC cell models. Therapeutic effects of the combined treatment of inhibitors of candidate genes and lenvatinib were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: We successfully identified NFKB1 and MET as critical drivers for the development of lenvatinib resistance in HCC cells. By perturbing the 2 genes with either CRISPR knockout or RNA interference approaches, lenvatinib treatments were significantly sensitized. Moreover, using small molecules QNZ and cabozantinib to target NFKB1 and MET, respectively, this together with lenvatinib could synergistically induce apoptosis and suppress HCC growth in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screening is a powerful tool for the design of rational combinational cancer therapy and provided candidate genes possible for combined treatments with lenvatinib to improve therapy efficacy.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗

PubMed2026

Anti-tumour effects of combined lenvatinib and EGFR Inhibition in advanced differentiated thyroid cancer cells.

PURPOSE: Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) typically has a favourable prognosis, while advanced forms of these tumours exhibit aggressive behaviour, leading to decreased survival. Lenvatinib has demonstrated effectiveness in managing advanced DTC. However, its long-term efficacy is compromised by resistance mechanisms, which remain unexplored, limiting its clinical utility. METHODS: In vitro studies were conducted using three advanced DTC cell lines of the papillary subtype: K1 (BRAF p.V600E), BCPAP (BRAF p.V600E) and TPC-1 (RET/PTC1). IC50 for Lenvatinib and Gefitinib were defined, and their effects on cell viability, colony formation, gene expression, and pathway activation were assessed individually and in combination. Comparative genomic hybridisation was performed to uncover intrinsic resistance mechanisms. RESULTS: Lenvatinib IC50 was higher in K1 and BCPAP than in TPC-1, indicating greater TPC-1 susceptibility, as confirmed by viability assays. Gefitinib showed similar IC50 values across all cell lines. The Lenvatinib plus Gefitinib combination (Combo) significantly reduced K1 and BCPAP viability when comparing with monotherapies, with no significant effects in TPC-1. Clonogenic assays mirrored these results and revealed higher recovery in K1 and BCPAP after Combo withdrawal. Combo treatment increased EGFR expression and induced ERK1/2 and AKT phosphorylation’s dysregulation in all cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that RET/PTC1 cells are more responsive to Lenvatinib than BRAF-mutated cells, and that EGFR targeting with Gefitinib enhanced Lenvatinib’s inhibitory effect in BRAF-mutated cells. Dysregulation of EGFR and Lenvatinib target gene’s expression, as well as of MAPK and PI3K signalling may indicate short-term adaptive resistance. These findings provide insight into Lenvatinib resistance mechanisms in thyroid cancer and highlight the need for further research to overcome refractoriness.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Continuous administration of lenvatinib after first documented disease progression in patients with radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib beyond first documented disease progression (LBP) and prognostic factors after progression in patients with radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study included adults with radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer who received lenvatinib between January 2012 and November 2023 and continued treatment after initial RECIST 1.1 progression. Patients who subsequently received other multikinase inhibitors or selective targeted therapies were excluded. Time to second treatment failure (second TTF) was defined as time from initial progression to permanent lenvatinib discontinuation for any reason; second progression-free survival (second PFS) as time from initial progression to subsequent radiographic progression or death; and post-progression survival (PPS) as time from initial progression to death. Outcomes were estimated by Kaplan–Meier methods, and prognostic factors were explored by Cox regression. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients met the eligibility criteria for LBP. The objective response rate after progression was 0%, whereas the disease control rate was 50.0%. Median second PFS and second TTF were 6.0 months and 8.0 months, respectively. Median PPS was 14.8 months. At 12 months after initial progression, 37.5% of patients remained on lenvatinib and 56.5% were alive. Baseline progressive disease at initial progression (tumor burden returning to or exceeding the pretreatment baseline) was associated with shorter second TTF, with similar trends for second PFS and PPS. The most common adverse events were hypertension, proteinuria, peripheral edema, and renal dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Continuation of lenvatinib beyond disease progression achieved modest additional disease control with acceptable safety in selected patients. In settings where access to subsequent-line systemic therapies is limited or no actionable targets are identified, LBP may serve as a pragmatic bridging approach for carefully selected patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Systematic meta-analysis of the toxicities and side effects of the targeted drug lenvatinib.

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib, an effective targeted drug for various cancers, has clinical medication safety concerns due to its toxicities and side effects. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated lenvatinib-induced any adverse events (any AEs) and nine aspects: vascular toxicities related to the circulatory system (vascular toxicities, blood system, and heart), toxicities of the skin and its appendages (skin/subcutaneous tissue and taste system), toxicities of the respiratory system (respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal and respiratory tract), toxicities of the nervous system (nervous system and general), toxicities of the digestive system (gastrointestinal and liver), toxicities of the urinary system, toxicities of the endocrine and metabolic system (endocrine and metabolism/nutrition), toxicities of the musculoskeletal system, and other severe toxicities. Toxicities and side effects were stratified by severity into any and ≥3 grades for analysis. PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for lenvatinib cancer clinical studies (cohort studies and randomized controlled trials) from inception to December 31, 2024; toxicity and side effect data were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: Nine high-quality studies were included, showing that lenvatinib is effective in cancers but has notable toxicities. Taking hypertension as an example, for any grade, the risk ratio (RR) was 2.34 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of [2.09, 2.62], a Z-value of 14.74, and a P-value <0.00001; for grade ≥3, the RR was 2.60 with a 95% CI of [2.21, 3.06], a Z-value of 11.44, and a P-value <0.00001. CONCLUSION: Lenvatinib is effective for cancer but toxic, and this study supports its rational clinical use.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

HIF-1 signaling contributes to lenvatinib resistance in patient-derived HCC organoids.

Resistance to lenvatinib remains an important limitation in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment. Six patient-derived organoid lines were established and classified as sensitive or resistant according to ex vivo drug responses, retaining histological and immunophenotypic features of matched parental tumors. Resistant organoids showed unchanged ATP activity, whereas sensitive ones exhibited pronounced morphological changes and reduced ATP activity at higher concentrations. Transcriptome sequencing identified 408 upregulated and 269 downregulated genes in resistant versus sensitive organoids, with HIF-1 signaling among altered pathways. In resistant organoids, lenvatinib increased HIF-1α, ANGPT2, and HK3 mRNA, whereas comparable changes were not detected in sensitive organoids. KC7F2 reduced these transcripts and further decreased ATP activity when combined with lenvatinib. In organoid-derived xenografts, this combination suppressed tumor growth and HIF-1 target expression more than lenvatinib alone, indicating HIF-1 signaling contributes to the resistant phenotype and its inhibition may enhance response.

Drug resistance↗

PubMed2026

Adjuvant tislelizumab, lenvatinib, and capecitabine for resected biliary tract cancer: a prospective phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of a triplet adjuvant regimen consisting of tislelizumab, lenvatinib, and capecitabine following radical resection in patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC). METHODS: In this open-label, single-arm trial, patients with histologically confirmed BTC who had undergone curative resection were enrolled to receive adjuvant therapy within 4-16 weeks postoperatively. The treatment regimen consisted of tislelizumab (200 mg), lenvatinib (8 mg), and capecitabine (1250 mg/m2). The primary endpoint was the 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate. Secondary endpoints included median DFS, 2-year DFS rate, and 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates, as well as safety profiles. Exploratory analyses were conducted to evaluate genomic alterations and prognostic biomarkers associated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Between February 24 and December 31, 2022, a total of 50 patients underwent treatment. As of the data cutoff (April 30, 2025), the median follow-up duration was 29.3 months (95% CI: 27.2-30.4). Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma constituted 78% of cases, with TNM stage III or IV observed in 40% of patients and poorly differentiated tumors identified in another 40%. The median DFS was calculated at 12.7 months (95% CI: 6.4-19.0), with DFS rates being reported as 55.5% (95% CI: 51.4%-57.6%) at 1 year and 30.8% (95% CI: 28.6%-32.9%) at 2 years, respectively. Median OS was not reached; however, the 1-year OS rate stood at an impressive figure of 93.8% (95% CI: 91.7%-95.9%) while the 3-year OS rate declined to 54.4% (95% CI: 50.0%-58.4%). By the exploratory analyses, FSIP2 mutation was associated shorter DFS (P < 0.001). Treatment-related grade 3 adverse events occurred in 20% of patients, with no treatment-related deaths or grade ≥ 4 toxicities reported. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant tislelizumab, lenvatinib, and capecitabine demonstrated clinical activity and tolerable safety in patients with resected BTC. Despite not meeting the primary endpoint, continued follow-up and further evaluation are warranted to better define the potential role of this combination regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05254847; registered prospectively on February 15, 2022.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Unravelling bioanalytical innovations, degradation processes, and impurity landscapes of VEGFR inhibitors.

From pre-formulation studies to clinical trials, VEGFR-targeted small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) require rigorous analytical standards. Bioanalysis, stability-indicating studies, and impurity profiling are used to examine chromatographic advances for VEGFR-targeted TKIs like sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib, sorafenib, cabozantinib, vandetanib, apatinib, lenvatinib, nintedanib, and regorafenib. An LC-MS/MS and UPLC-MS/MS routinely show sub ng/mL performance, as shown by LLOQs (0.2 ng/mL) for sunitinib and axitinib, 1 ng/mL for pazopanib, 5-7 ng/mL for sorafenib, 0.5-1.5 ng/mL for regorafenib metabolic products, and 0.1-0.5 ng/mL for lenvatinib. These approaches are used for pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring due to their good correlation coefficient of 0.1-10,000 ng/mL, accuracy of 95%-108%, and precision of 15% RSD. UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS distinguishes degradants and metabolites during forced degradation studies, enabling structural elucidation following ICH M7 risk evaluation protocol. HPTLC/MLC offers fast, sensitive screenings, while RP-HPLC/DAD or HPLC-UV offer reliable, cost-effective routine quality-control solutions with LOD/LOQ in the μg/mL range and linearity of 10-240 μg/mL. This review lists the structures and CAS numbers of ten VEGFR-2 TKI degradants and metabolites, as well as pharmacopeial impurities in SMILES forms. It will be useful for future method development and regulatory applications. To ensure VEGFR-targeted TKI quality, safety, and therapeutic efficacy, LC-MS/MS for trace quantification and HRMS for structure elucidation provide a robust, future-oriented framework. To improve VEGFR-targeted TKI quality, safety, and regulatory compliance, analytical development should focus on HRMS-based impurity characterization, AI-assisted degradation prediction, green chromatography, and harmonized bioanalytical validation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comprehensive Multiplatform Tyrosine Kinase Profiling Reveals Novel Actionable FGFR Aberrations across Sarcomas Affecting the Young.

Limited targeted agents are approved for pediatric sarcomas. Tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors (TKi) have shown clinical efficacy in some, but not all, young patients with sarcoma. A major obstacle preventing further advances and clinical implementation is the lack of predictive response biomarkers to guide TK-targeted treatments. TK-activating fusions or mutations are rare in these patients. RNA overexpression of TKs is a frequent feature. The unresolved question is when upregulated TK expression is associated with kinase activation and signaling dependence. We explored the TK molecular landscape of 107 patients with sarcoma from the ZERO Childhood Cancer Precision Medicine Program (ZERO) using whole-genome and -transcriptome sequencing. Phosphoproteomic analyses of tyrosine phosphorylation (pY) and functional in vitro and in vivo assays were performed in cell lines and patient-derived xenografts (PDX). Our analysis shows that although novel genomic driver lesions are rare, when present they are therapeutically actionable as exemplified by a novel LSM1-FGFR1 fusion identified in a patient with osteosarcoma. We further show that in certain contexts, TK RNA expression can indicate TK pathway activity and predict TKi sensitivity. We highlight the utility of FGFR inhibitors in PAX3-FOXO1 fusion-positive rhabdomyosarcomas (FP-RMS) characterized by high FGFR4 and FGF8 RNA expression levels and FGFR4 activation (FGFR4_pY). We demonstrate marked tumor growth inhibition in all FP-RMS PDXs treated with single-agent FGF401 (FGFR4-specific inhibitor) and single-agent lenvatinib (multikinase FGFR inhibitor) and report a clinical response to lenvatinib in a patient with relapsed metastatic FP-RMS. Altogether, we identified new patients with sarcoma who may benefit from FGFR inhibitors, most notably FP-RMS via FGFR4/FGF8 coexpression.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Molecular characterization of salivary cancers: Patterns of genomic alterations and potential for impact on therapeutic choices.

BACKGROUND: Salivary cancers are rare malignancies with diverse histologies, molecular landscape, and limited effective systemic therapy options. Recent tumour genomics research has identified driver alterations in salivary gland cancers that have led to personalized therapy approaches. The primary objective was to perform molecular characterization using next generation sequencing (NGS) panel and evaluate the potential impact of results on clinical decision-making and treatment outcomes. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or incurable metastatic salivary cancers suitable for systemic therapy underwent NGS tumour testing with an amplicon-based DNA/RNA NGS panel. Patient demographics, baseline characteristics, treatment and treatment outcomes were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: From 2021 to 2024, 58 advanced salivary cancer patients underwent molecular characterization of their tumour. Baseline characteristics at diagnosis: male 60%, median age 67, most common histologies; adenoid cystic 27%, salivary duct 19% and mucoepidermoid 12%. PIK3CA alterations were the most common molecular finding across all subtypes 22% (13/58) and were enriched in salivary duct carcinoma 73% (8/11). Other alterations identified were: ERBB2 (4), EGFR (2), HRAS (3), NTRK3 (2), BRAF p.V600E (1), and RET (1). Immunohistochemistry identified androgen receptor positivity across salivary cancer subtypes in 8/19 and HER2 positivity in 2/20 tested. Twenty-two patients received systemic therapy prior to NGS results for incurable/metastatic disease, first line treatments included 69% chemotherapy, 18% anti-androgen, 9% lenvatinib, 4% trial. CONCLUSION: Molecular characterization of salivary cancers identified targetable alterations in 37% of patients. The identification of potential therapeutic targets offers the opportunity for expanded treatment options to benefit salivary gland cancer patients.

Metastatic salivary gland cancer↗

PubMed2026

Analysis and validation of abnormal signaling pathways and immune cell infiltration characteristics in digestive system cancers based on peroxisome-related genes.

BACKGROUND: Although emerging evidence suggests a role for peroxisomes in tumorigenesis, their functions in digestive cancers remain unclear. This study aims to investigate the association between peroxisomes and digestive tract tumors. METHODS: To systematically investigate peroxisomal functions in digestive cancers, we first constructed and validated tumor-specific prognostic signatures based on peroxisome-related genes (PRGs) through univariate Cox, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and multivariate Cox regression analyses. We then characterized the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) with CIBERSORT, X-CELL, and EPIC algorithms, and identified tumor-specific and common signalings via Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Focusing on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we experimentally validated peroxisome-related therapeutic responses by profiling signature genes in radioresistant cells and an orthotopic transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) rat model. PEX13 knockdown further assessed peroxisomal role in radiosensitivity and targeted therapy response. Clinical relevance of PEX13 was evaluated in HCC cohort. Single-cell RNA sequencing dataset and lipidomics further revealed peroxisomal mechanisms in HCC progression. Finally, peroxisomal function in colorectal cancer (CRC) was validated in vitro. RESULTS: Novel peroxisome-related prognostic signatures demonstrated strong predictive power in HCC, colon adenocarcinoma, rectal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma, esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and cholangiocarcinoma. High-risk patients displayed an immunosuppressive microenvironment, characterized by increased infiltration of regulatory T cells, M2 macrophages, Th2 cells, or cancer-associated fibroblasts, or Th1 cells' reduction. Peroxisomes engaged in several distinct yet convergent pathways, most notably "positive regulation of response to stimuli". HCC prognostic genes were dynamically regulated in response to therapeutic stimuli, including radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and TACE. Clinically, the expression of PEX13 was markedly upregulated in tumor tissues from therapy-resistant HCC patients. Mechanistically, peroxisomal dysfunction induced by silencing PEX13 in HCC or UBE2D2 in CRC may overcome therapeutic resistance (radiotherapy/ lenvatinib resistance in HCC, radioresistance in CRC) through reprogramming lipid metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: Peroxisomes act as pivotal regulators of digestive cancer progression by modulating signaling pathways, the TIME, therapeutic resistance, and lipid metabolism. Targeting peroxisomal function, particularly in high-risk subgroups of HCC and CRC, warrants further exploration as a promising therapeutic strategy.

Peroxisomes↗

PubMed2026

Marked response to dabrafenib plus trametinib in a patient with BRAF V600E-mutant pancreatic hepatoid carcinoma: a case report and systematic analysis of 57 cases.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic hepatoid carcinoma (PHC) is an extremely rare pancreatic malignancy characterized pathologically by hepatocellular-like differentiation. Some patients may present with elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Owing to the limited number of reported cases, the clinical features, molecular characteristics, and systemic treatment strategies for PHC remain poorly defined. BRAF V600E is an actionable alteration with established therapeutic value in several solid tumors; however, its clinical significance in PHC remains unclear. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 64-year-old man with advanced PHC who presented with painless jaundice, dark urine, and recent weight loss. Laboratory tests showed marked cholestatic liver injury and significantly elevated AFP. Imaging revealed a pancreatic head-neck mass with portal vein tumor thrombus and regional lymph node metastases, corresponding to cT4N1M1, stage IV disease. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was first performed to relieve obstructive jaundice. Biopsy of the pancreatic lesion showed poorly differentiated carcinoma. Based on hepatoid morphology, immunophenotype, elevated serum AFP, imaging findings, and exclusion of primary hepatocellular carcinoma, the patient was diagnosed with PHC. Comprehensive genomic profiling identified a BRAF V600E mutation with a variant allele frequency of 31.89%, together with MDM2 and MYC amplification. The molecular profile was characterized by microsatellite stability, low tumor mutational burden, MGMT promoter methylation, and low PD-L1 expression. After two cycles of pembrolizumab-based first-line therapy combined with paclitaxel, S-1, and lenvatinib, AFP continued to increase and imaging showed rapid tumor enlargement, consistent with immune checkpoint inhibitor-related hyperprogressive disease. The treatment was then switched to dabrafenib plus trametinib. AFP declined rapidly and returned to the normal range within approximately two months. Imaging showed marked regression of the pancreatic primary lesion, disappearance of the portal vein tumor thrombus and metastatic lymph nodes, and conversion of peripheral blood minimal residual disease to negative. The best response was partial response. After approximately six months of targeted therapy, occult disease progression emerged. Subsequent addition of cetuximab, replacement of the MEK inhibitor, and dose escalation of targeted therapy did not restore sustained systemic disease control, although local disease remained manageable with subsequent treatment adjustments. Proton radiotherapy was then delivered to the residual pancreatic lesion, followed by CyberKnife radiotherapy for a newly detected 2.3-cm metastasis in the caudate lobe of the liver. As of April 2026, the patient's AFP level remained close to normal at 14 ng/mL, local lesions were well controlled, peripheral blood minimal residual disease had turned positive, and the patient remained in a stable tumor-bearing state. SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS: We further summarized 57 previously reported cases of PHC. The median age was 54 years, and 66.7% of patients were male. Tumors occurred at different pancreatic sites, including the pancreatic head in 21 cases, body in 8 cases, tail in 13 cases, and multifocal lesions in 15 cases. More than half of the patients had metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. The immunophenotype of PHC was highly heterogeneous. Regarding treatment, 47 patients underwent surgery, 20 received chemotherapy, and 6 received targeted therapy. The 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates were 70.7% and 43.1%, respectively, indicating an overall poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: This case suggests that BRAF V600E may represent a clinically actionable driver alteration in PHC. Dabrafenib plus trametinib induced a rapid and deep response in this patient with advanced BRAF V600E-mutant PHC. Microsatellite stability, low tumor mutational burden, low PD-L1 expression, and MDM2 amplification may be associated with limited benefit from immunotherapy and a risk of hyperprogression. After resistance to targeted therapy, local radiotherapy may serve as an important strategy for controlling oligoresidual and oligometastatic lesions. Together with the literature review, this case supports early comprehensive molecular profiling and individualized multidisciplinary management for advanced PHC.

BRAF V600E↗

PubMed2026

Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Resectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: From Retrospective Studies to Randomized Evidence.

Complete resection remains the only potentially curative treatment for localized intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), yet postoperative recurrence is common, particularly in patients with high-risk disease. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy may permit earlier control of occult micrometastatic disease, optimize the delivery of systemic treatment, and provide an in vivo assessment of tumor biology prior to major hepatectomy. These potential benefits must be balanced against treatment-related toxicity, surgical delay, and the risk of disease progression precluding resection. Early evidence was primarily derived from retrospective studies, which yielded inconsistent survival outcomes and exhibited substantial vulnerability to confounding and treatment-selection bias. The single-arm NEO-GAP trial subsequently demonstrated the feasibility of administering neoadjuvant gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel followed by surgical resection. More recently, the randomized phase II-III ZSAB-neoGOLP trial showed that neoadjuvant gemcitabine-oxaliplatin, lenvatinib, and toripalimab followed by surgery prolonged median event-free survival compared with upfront surgery (median: 18.0 vs. 8.7 months) without substantially compromising surgical feasibility. However, the interim overall survival analysis was inconclusive, and the generalizability of these findings beyond selected, medically fit patients treated at Chinese centers remains uncertain. This narrative review critically appraises the evolving evidence, discusses patient selection and perioperative treatment, and identifies priorities for future research. Current evidence supports the selective consideration of neoadjuvant therapy in medically fit patients with technically resectable but oncologically high-risk iCCA, rather than its routine use in all resectable cases.

GOLP↗

PubMed2026

Association between pembrolizumab-based therapy exposure and survival outcomes in metastatic or recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma: a multi-center real-world study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between exposure to pembrolizumab-based therapy in the post-platinum setting and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic or recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients with metastatic or recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma treated at three tertiary centers between January 2008 and April 2025 were included. Patients received various treatment modalities after recurrence or progression in the post-platinum setting. Survival outcomes were analyzed according to whether patients were exposed to pembrolizumab-based therapy after recurrence or progression. Survival after recurrence and overall survival were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models. Additional analyses using inverse probability of treatment weighting, doubly robust methods, and time-dependent Cox models were performed. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were included, of whom 42 (28.6%) received pembrolizumab-based therapy in the post-platinum setting. In multi-variable analyses, pembrolizumab-based therapy exposure was independently associated with improved survival after recurrence (hazard ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 0.83, p = .01) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.48; 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.89, p =.02). Positive peritoneal washing cytology was independently associated with poorer survival outcomes. In time-dependent Cox analyses using inverse probability of treatment weighting, pembrolizumab-based therapy exposure remained significantly associated with improved survival after recurrence (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.96, p =.035), whereas the association with overall survival was no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to pembrolizumab-based therapy in the post-platinum setting was associated with improved survival after recurrence in patients with metastatic or recurrent uterine carcinosarcoma. These findings support the potential clinical relevance of pembrolizumab-based therapy in the post-platinum setting and warrant further prospective validation.

Aged↗