PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Liraglutide”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Insights from changes in NDEV biomarkers of metabolism: effects of PPARγ and GLP1 receptor agonists on brain metabolism.

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance (IR) is implicated in central nervous system disorders, including depression and Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: We analyzed biological samples from two cohorts of clinical trial participants: (1) participants with unremitted depression after six months of treatment as usual who received pioglitazone (PPARγ agonist, N = 12) or placebo and (2) middle-aged participants at genetic risk for AD who received liraglutide (glucagon-like peptide 1 [GLP1] receptor agonist, N = 15) or placebo. These cohorts, which previously showed treatment-related improvements in peripheral IR, were used to assess the effects of pioglitazone and liraglutide on CNS insulin signaling using neuron-derived extracellular vesicles (NDEVs) as biomarkers. We utilized biological samples to measure biomarkers of IR in NDEVs. Eleven Akt-mTOR pathway proteins were measured before and after 12 weeks of treatment in both groups. RESULTS: Participants who received pioglitazone experienced broader changes, with significant increases in GSK3β (Ser9), mTOR (Ser2448), and RPS6 (Ser235/Ser236; all P ≤ .02) compared with placebo, and 77% of participants showed mTOR (Ser2448) response. Participants who received liraglutide demonstrated significantly increased NDEV-associated phosphorylated Akt (Ser473) and mTOR (Ser2448; P = .04 and P = .025, respectively) compared with placebo, with 40% and 30% of participants in the liraglutide group showing biomarker response in both Akt (Ser473) and mTOR (Ser2448), respectively. These effects appeared relatively independent from changes in fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentration at 120-minutes during the oral glucose tolerance test. DISCUSSION: Our findings demonstrate CNS-specific biomarker responses to both PPARγ agonists and GLP1 receptor agonists.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

OCT1 Variants Are Associated with Metformin Clearance and Gluconeogenesis: Mechanistic Insights for Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes in the MIGHTY Study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Behavioral and phenotypic characteristics do not fully explain variability in African Americans with youth-onset type 2 diabetes (Y-T2D) treated with metformin with or without liraglutide. We hypothesized that biological heterogeneity, including genetic variation in the metformin transporter OCT1, influences metformin pharmacokinetics and hepatic glucose flux. Therefore, we sought to characterize metformin pharmacokinetics in Y-T2D and evaluate genetic variants known to modulate metformin efficacy in adults to determine the mechanisms underlying variation in treatment response. METHODS: We evaluated genetic variants related to metformin transport and mechanisms of action in 30 Y-T2D using a candidate-gene approach to evaluate the association of pharmacogenetic variants with fasting glucose and gluconeogenesis. In a subset of Y-T2D randomized to 3 months of metformin (n=11) or metformin and liraglutide (n=8), we constructed a metformin population pharmacokinetic model and evaluated gene variant associations. RESULTS: A one-compartment first-order absorption and elimination pharmacokinetic model provided the optimal fit. Metformin pharmacokinetic parameters were similar by group and not related to glycemia. The rs628031_OCT1 A allele was associated with greater metformin clearance. The rs622342_OCT1 C allele was associated with lower post-treatment fractional gluconeogenesis (&#x3b2; [95% CI] = -8.8 [-14.13, -3.47] %, Adjusted R2 = 0.56, P = 0.003). The rs7903146_TCF7L2 T allele was associated with greater reductions in fasting glucose among those treated with metformin + liraglutide (&#x3b2; = -1.32 [-2.42, -0.22] mmol/L, Adjusted R2 = 0.8, P<0.002), but baseline glucose and gluconeogenesis (P<0.0001) were the strongest predictors of post-treatment glycemia. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: In Y-T2D, OCT1 gene variants rs628031 and rs622342 were associated with metformin clearance and gluconeogenesis, respectively. TCF7L2 variant rs7903146 may contribute to differences in glycemic response in youth treated with metformin and liraglutide. These findings suggest genetic variants may be important for understanding variable metformin response in Y-T2D.

SLC22A1↗
PubMed2026

Pharmacological Interventions for Weight Reduction in Patients With Schizophrenia Treated With Antipsychotics: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Significant weight gain is a concerning adverse effect of antipsychotic medications experienced by patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs). Its high prevalence and significant contribution to cardiometabolic morbidity in this population warrant better consensus on the management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain and related comorbidity. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between pharmacological interventions and changes in body weight among antipsychotic-treated patients with SSDs. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal were searched up to December 5, 2025. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials examining any pharmacological intervention for weight reduction in antipsychotic-treated patients with SSDs were included. No restrictions to study duration were applied. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: A systematic review and frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted. Certainty in the evidence was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) tool. The first round of data analysis took place between May 2025 to November 2025 and was updated in December 2025. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in body weight following treatment with pharmacological agent vs placebo or standard care. Secondary outcomes included other anthropometric and metabolic parameters. RESULTS: A total of 95 studies examining 39 individual pharmacological interventions were included in this review (pooled N&#x2009;=&#x2009;5898). The network meta-analysis found that semaglutide (mean difference [MD], -10.98 kg; 95% CI, -13.33 to -8.62; k&#x2009;=&#x2009;3; moderate certainty), liraglutide (MD, -5.43 kg; 95% CI, -8.54 to -2.33; k&#x2009;=&#x2009;2; moderate certainty), topiramate (MD, -3.95 kg; 95% CI, -5.89 to -2.02; k&#x2009;=&#x2009;5; moderate certainty), metformin (MD, -3.86 kg; 95% CI, -5.02 to -2.70; k&#x2009;=&#x2009;16; moderate certainty), and exenatide (MD, -2.97 kg; 95% CI, -5.83 to -0.11; k&#x2009;=&#x2009;3; moderate certainty) were associated with the most significant reductions in body weight compared to placebo. Other interventions including ramelteon, nizatidine, and aripiprazole were also found to be associated with weight-reducing effects but with very low certainty of evidence. Clinically meaningful weight change of 5% or greater was observed with semaglutide and metformin. Beneficial effects on other metabolic outcomes were also noted with several of the medications, and there were no major concerns with gastrointestinal adverse effects or leaving the study early (ie, dropouts) between interventions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This systematic review and network meta-analysis found substantial variability in weight-related outcomes across pharmacological interventions for antipsychotic-treated individuals with SSDs. Semaglutide, liraglutide, topiramate, metformin, and exenatide were associated with the greatest reductions in body weight and were supported by the highest-certainty evidence, providing guidance for clinicians managing antipsychotic-associated weight gain.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Musculoskeletal Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are increasingly used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity, but their effects on musculoskeletal health remain completely misunderstood. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review/meta-analysis aims to synthesise clinical data on the effects of GLP-1 RAs on key relevant bone, muscle, and joint outcomes. METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (both via Ovid&#xae; platform) and Embase were searched from inception to March 2025 to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or real-world evidence (RWE) studies to be included. This bibliographic search was completed manually. A random-effect model meta-analysis was performed for any outcome reported in at least 2 studies. Subgroup analyses were performed on the type of GLP-1 RAs, type of comparator used and study design. Sensitivity analyses (i.e., leave-out sensitivity analyses and analyses restricted to the most adjusted effect estimate) were performed to test the robustness of the data. The strength of evidence was assessed using GRADE. This work has been performed in adherence with PRISMA statement. (PROSPERO Record ID: CRD420251024082). RESULTS: From 1148 potentially relevant references, 60 articles (46 RCTs, 13 RWE studies and 1 pharmacovigilance study, comprising 1,250,717 individuals) met our inclusion criteria. Different GLP-1 RAs were represented across the panel of studies, i.e., semaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide, dulaglutide, tirzepatide (dual agonist gastric inhibitory polypeptide [GIP]/GLP-1) and others. No effect on bone outcomes (i.e., bone mineral density [all sites] and fractures [all sites]) were observed when the meta-analytical models included the most adjusted effect size. Regarding muscle outcomes, a significant decrease of lean body mass/fat-free mass was consistently observed with GLP-1 RAs in the global model (k = 28, standardised mean difference [SMD] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.8; -0.23, I2 88%, p-value for heterogeneity <0.0001), which remained robust in all sensitivity analyses. Subgroup analyses showed that the effect was mainly driven by liraglutide and semaglutide, with a decrease in lean body mass/fat-free mass observed when GLP-1 RAs were compared with placebo. No publication bias was found. Regarding joint outcome, models revealed no significant change in The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain, physical function and stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis is the first to investigate the effects of GLP-1 RAs on a large panel of musculoskeletal health outcomes. While no significant effects were observed on bone- or joint-related outcomes, GLP-1 RAs were associated with reductions in lean body mass/fat-free mass, although the certainty of evidence was low and these changes appeared largely related to weight loss. Whether these changes translate into clinically meaningful impairments in muscle function or physical performance remains uncertain. Further studies in this field, including those looking at muscle function, strength or performance and using multivariate models considering confounding are needed to better reinforce the models and final findings.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2026

Weight regain following discontinuation of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in adults who are overweight or obese: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on weight changes and the occurrence of adverse reactions in overweight or obese adults after drug withdrawal. METHODS: Computerized searches were conducted in evidence-based databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus. The search period was from the establishment of the database to December 2025. Collect randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled trials on GLP-1RAs, including tirzepatide, semaglutide, liraglutide, and dulaglutide, for the treatment of overweight or obese adult patients. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias V2.0 tool provided by the Cochrane Collaboration, and meta-analysis was performed using the R programming language. RESULTS: A total of 699 studies were initially retrieved. Eventually, six studies involving 8,993 patients were included in the quantitative analysis, comprising 5,553 patients in the discontinuation group and 3,440 in the continued treatment group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that, compared with the continued treatment group, the weight difference in the discontinuation group was mean difference (MD) = 17.90%, 95% confidence interval (CI) [14.11-21.69], P&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.0001. It can be seen that there was a significant rebound in weight after drug withdrawal, and there was statistical heterogeneity among the studies (P&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0082). Subgroup analysis further revealed that the weight rebound amplitude after discontinuation of tirzepatide was significantly higher than that of semaglutide. This result suggests that the differences in the mechanism of action of different GLP-1RAs may be the reason for the differences in weight changes after discontinuation. In addition, the percentage difference in body weight between after and before drug withdrawal was MD = 9.11%, 95% CI [7.91-10.30], P&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.0001, further verifying the trend of weight rebound after drug withdrawal. The summary of adverse reaction reports analyzed and studied indicates that after drug withdrawal, the overall adverse reactions of patients decreased, gastrointestinal adverse reactions decreased, and the incidence of cardiovascular events was not affected by drug withdrawal. CONCLUSION: There is a significant weight rebound phenomenon after discontinuation of GLP-1RAs, and the rebound magnitudes vary among different types of drugs. At the same time, there is a risk of adverse reactions during the use of such drugs.

Humans↗