SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Local Lymph Node Assay”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1991

Draining lymph node cell activation in guinea pigs: comparisons with the murine local lymph node assay.

The local lymph node assay in the mouse is a novel predictive test for the identification of contact sensitizing chemicals. The purpose of the studies described was to determine whether a similar local lymph node assay could be performed successfully in guinea pigs; currently the species of choice for assessment of sensitizing potential for regulatory purposes. Ten sensitizing chemicals (oxazolone, picryl chloride, 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene, benzocaine, cinnamic aldehyde, 2,4,-dinitrothiocyanobenzene, p-nitrosodimethylaniline, formaldehyde, p-phenylenediamine and cyanuric chloride) and equal concentrations of sodium lauryl sulphate were examined in a guinea pig local lymph node assay. Animals received three consecutive daily applications of various concentrations of the test chemical on the dorsum of both ears. Control animals were untreated. Five days following the initiation of exposure, draining auricular lymph nodes were excised and weighed. Suspensions of lymph node cells (LNC) were prepared and cultured for 24 or 48 h and proliferation measured by incorporation of [3H]thymidine. Exposure to at least one concentration of all sensitizing chemicals, other than benzocaine, induced proliferation by draining LNC. Responses were higher at 24 h rather than 48 h. Evidence is presented that guinea pig LNC proliferation may be enhanced or maintained by addition to culture of an exogenous source of the T cell growth factor interleukin 2 (IL-2). Draining lymph node weight was increased following exposure to some sensitizing chemicals but, compared with LNC proliferation, provided a less sensitive correlate of lymph node activation. Exposure to sodium lauryl sulphate failed to induce changes in either lymph node weight of LNC proliferation. Data are compared with three-day murine local lymph node assays performed concurrently. The available information indicates that the local lymph node assay may be performed in guinea pigs.

Allergens↗

PubMed1995

Structure activity relationships in skin sensitization using the murine local lymph node assay.

Murine local lymph assay node data for 106 chemicals are listed. Among these, 73 are active in the assay indicating their potential as skin sensitizing agents. Broad structure activity relationships (SAR) are suggested based on the electrophilic theory of skin sensitization suggested by Landsteiner and Jacobs in 1936, and elaborated by Dupuis and Benezra in 1982. Eight classes of agent are discerned; electrophiles, potential electrophiles after metabolism, Michael-reactive agents, benzoylating agents, ionic chemicals and miscellaneous agents. The electrophilic theory cannot at present fully explain the activity of agents in the last two classes. That fact will hopefully focus research into their mode of action. Some chemicals fit equally into more than one class, and such agents are entered into the several classes in order not to bias the analysis. Attention is given to why not all chemicals of a class are active in the assay. It is concluded that a combination of inappropriate lipophilicity, molecular size and metabolic detoxification are responsible for these inactivities. Given a sufficient number of analogues tested within each class it should be possible eventually to predict with accuracy the skin sensitizing potential of new members of the class. However, the present analysis is qualitative, not quantitative. Finally, the parallelism between sensitizing potential and mutagenic potential for chemicals is explored further.

Allergens↗

PubMed1992

Detection of contact sensitivity of metal salts using the murine local lymph node assay.

The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a predictive test for the detection of contact allergens. Nickel and chromium sensitization are common cases in man. However, in a previous study topical application of nickel sulfate and potassium dichromate in aqueous solution failed to induce activation in the draining lymph node. This study describes the application of LLNA to evaluate the contact sensitivity of metal salts. The metal salts were applied in dimethylsulfoxide or aqueous ethanol solution. In some experiments, the skin of the ears was gently abraded using a needle prior to application of metal salts. The ability of seven metal salts to induce lymph node cell (LNC) proliferation was compared. Nickel, cobalt, chromium and copper salts increased LNC proliferation, whereas zinc, manganese and iron salts failed to induce LNC proliferation in this assay.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Comparison of mouse strains using the local lymph node assay.

The local lymph node assay (LLNA), as recommended by the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM), only allows for the use of CBA mice. The objective of these studies was to begin to assess the response of chemical sensitizers in the LLNA across six strains of female mice (C57BL/6, SJL/J, BALB/c, B6C3F1, DBA/2 and CBA). The moderate sensitizer alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde (HCA) was chosen as the test chemical, while toluene diisocyanate (TDI) and 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) were evaluated at single concentrations as positive controls. Draining lymph node cell proliferation following acetone exposure varied across strains. SJL mice had a significantly higher degree of proliferation with 2111 d.p.m./2 nodes. The remaining five strains demonstrated responses which ranged from 345 to 887 dpm/2 nodes. DBA/2, B6C3F1, BALB/c and CBA mice had essentially equal levels of lymph node proliferation following exposure to the three chemicals. While C57BL/6 mice gave similar results as CBA mice following DNFB and HCA administration, the LLNA response to TDI was considerably lower. SJL mice provided low stimulation indexes (SI) values for all three chemicals evaluated. Regardless of the level of LLNA response, all six mouse strains identified the sensitization potential of HCA, TDI or DNFB. Based on these studies, DBA/2, B6C3F1 and BALB/c mice are good choices for continued evaluation as additional mouse strains for use in the LLNA.

Acrolein↗

PubMed1991

Anamnestic responses to contact allergens: application in the murine local lymph node assay.

The murine local lymph node assay, an alternative predictive test for the identification of contact sensitizing chemicals, is based upon the fact that skin allergens induce proliferation in lymph nodes draining the site of application. In the present study we have examined whether pre-exposure to the test chemical at a distant site enhances subsequent draining lymph node cell proliferation and, thereby, the sensitivity of the assay. Experiments were performed using both in vitro and in situ measurement of induced lymph node cell proliferation. It was found that, with the exception of potent skin sensitizers such as picryl chloride and oxazolone, which impair subsequent proliferative activity as a consequence of induced immunoregulatory processes, pre-treatment with the test allergen resulted in enhanced proliferation. Evidence is presented that the local lymph node assay response to a variety of skin allergens (including eugenol, isoeugenol, dihydrocoumarin, 4-vinylpyridine, cinnamic aldehyde and 2,4,5-trichlorophenol) was augmented when mice received a single exposure to the same chemical 5 days earlier. It is concluded that the use of a modified protocol, incorporating pre-exposure to the test material, can enhance local lymph node assay responses to all but the most potent skin allergens, and may be of particular value when increased sensitivity is required.

Allergens↗

PubMed2000

Activity of human contact allergens in the murine local lymph node assay.

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a predictive test for the identification of chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization. Since its original development, the assay has been the subject of national and international evaluation studies and extensive comparisons with guinea pig tests and human data. On the basis of these investigations, the LLNA has recently been endorsed by ICCVAM (Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods) as a stand-alone method for skin sensitization hazard identification. At the same time, ICCVAM confirmed that, although the LLNA is not an in vitro method, it does represent a refinement in the way animals are used and can provide a means for reducing the number of animals used in sensitization hazard assessment. The investigations described here were designed to explore further the ability of the LLNA to identify accurately those chemicals that cause allergic contact dermatitis in humans. To that end we have measured, amongst 3 independent laboratories, LLNA responses induced by a total of 18 test chemicals, 11 of which are known to cause skin sensitization and 7 of which are believed not to be associated with any significant evidence of allergic contact dermatitis in humans. The LLNA correctly classified 16 of the 18 materials. The 11 chemicals tested which are associated with allergic contact dermatitis in humans were found to be positive in the LLNA. Of the 7 materials believed to be non-sensitizers, 5 were negative in the LLNA and 2 produced positive results. Collectively, these data provide additional evidence that the LLNA is able to discriminate skin sensitizers from those chemicals which do not possess a significant skin sensitization potential and thus provides a method for hazard identification that offers important animal welfare benefits.

Allergens↗

PubMed2002

Ranking of allergenic potency of rubber chemicals in a modified local lymph node assay.

A modified local lymph node assay (LLNA) with ex vivo tritium thymidine (3H-TdR) labeling of the proliferating lymph node cells was used for determination of the allergenic potency of chemicals used in the production of rubber for latex medical gloves. Fifteen chemicals known to induce contact hypersensitivity reactions in man, including various thiuram, carbamate, and benzothiazole compounds, and one amine were tested. The EC3 (effective concentration inducing a 3-fold increase in proliferation of lymph node cells [Stimulation Index, SI = 3]) was calculated with nonlinear regression analysis, including a bootstrap method for determination of the 5-95% confidence interval of the EC3 value. This procedure identified 14 out of the 15 chemicals tested as sensitizers, while for one chemical, ZDBC, no EC3 could be calculated due to low responses and a lack of a dose-response relationship in the data obtained. The ranking order of the chemicals with increasing EC3 values (and thus decreasing allergenic potency) was found to be in the following order: ZDEC < TMTD < TETD < ZPC < ZDMC < MBTS < PTD < TMTM < MBT < MBI < PTT < ZMBT < TBTD < DEA < ZDBC. Our results indicate that the chemicals of choice for use in the production of natural rubber latex products would be for the thiuram compounds, TBTD; for the carbamates, ZDBC; and for the benzothiazoles, ZMBT. However, one has to be aware that besides potency, the total amount of residual chemical present in the final product is also important for allergy induction.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

PubMed2002

Examination of a vehicle for use with water soluble materials in the murine local lymph node assay.

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a validated method for identifying skin sensitization hazard. Vehicle choice can influence the sensitization potential of haptens in both the LLNA and in humans, therefore selection of an appropriate vehicle is important. Suggested vehicles for the LLNA include organic solvents and organic-aqueous mixtures. However, due to its high surface tension and poor wetting qualities, water is not recommended and therefore testing aqueous soluble materials can be problematic. The aims of this investigation were to identify a water-based vehicle that possesses better skin wetting properties than water alone, and to assess its performance relative to other solvents in the LLNA using aqueous soluble haptens. The selected wetting agent was the surfactant Pluronic(R) L92 (L92). Concentrations of L92 of up to 50% did not induce positive responses in the LLNA. 1% aqueous L92 was chosen for further examination. Dose-response analyses were performed with dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (DNBS) and formaldehyde formulated either in water, 1% L92, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or dimethyl formamide (DMF). Potassium dichromate (PDC) and nickel sulfate were tested in 1% L92, DMSO or DMF. The highest concentration of potassium dichromate was retested in each vehicle and in water to assess the effect of the wetting agent. Estimates of the relative sensitizing potency in each vehicle were determined by calculation of EC3 values (the estimated concentration required to induce a threshold positive response). While DNBS and formaldehyde produced positive responses in all four vehicles, their relative potency varied among the vehicles. The rank ordering of potencies for both materials was, from highest to lowest, DMF > or = DMSO > 1% L92 > water. Compared with water, use of 1% L92 resulted in >2-fold increase in potency for DNBS and >3-fold increase for formaldehyde. PDC was positive in DMF, DMSO and 1% L92. The potency ranking was DMF > or = DMSO > 1% L92. Re-evaluation of 0.5% PDC confirmed that formulations of both DMSO and DMF induced strong proliferative responses, whereas somewhat less proliferation was recorded with the 1% L92 vehicle. PDC in water was without activity. The performance of 1% L92 as a vehicle for nickel sulfate was assessed relative to DMSO and DMF. In DMSO, nickel sulfate produced a stimulation index (SI) >3 at only the highest level. Testing in DMF induced low levels of proliferation, but failed to produce a SI of 3 at any concentration tested. When formulated in 1% L92, nickel sulfate caused a SI of 3 when tested at 2.5%. Based on the results of these experiments, for identification of sensitization hazard of aqueous soluble materials using the LLNA, DMF and DMSO are the preferred vehicles. However, if a test material is not soluble in DMF or DMSO, or if higher test concentrations can be achieved in an aqueous vehicle, then 1% L92 may provide a better alternative to water alone in terms of improved assay performance.

Allergens↗

PubMed1999

Development of a non-radioactive endpoint in a modified local lymph node assay.

A murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) has been developed as an alternative to guinea pig models for contact sensitization testing. Although the LLNA appears to be a little less sensitive than the most stringent of guinea pig assays, it provides a rapid, objective, quantitative and cost-effective method for screening strong contact sensitizers and has advantages with respect to animal welfare. However, a potential disadvantage is the need for the use of radioactive material. We have reported previously that an ex vivo assay based on similar principles to the original in vivo LLNA, but using a non-radioactive endopoint, was valid for the prediction of strong sensitizers. This ex vivo assay was not sensitive enough to allow prediction of moderately potent ones. In this study, we propose a new parameter, Corrected IL-2 Index (CII), for the prediction of moderate sensitizers. To obtain CII the IL-2 release in the supernatant of the cell culture is corrected for lymph node weight ratio and ratio of CD4-positive subset. We found that CII predicted the allergenicity of moderate sensitizers, including the ones recommended by the OECD in guideline 406, such as mercaptobenzothiazole and hexyl cinnamic aldehyde. The allergenicity of metal salts, such as potassium dichromate, ammonium tetrachloroplatinate and cobalt chloride, was also predicted by the CII. We conclude that the use of CII as an index significantly increases the sensitivity of the ex vivo method so that moderate sensitizers may also be detected.

Allergens↗

PubMed1997

Assessment of the sensitization potential of five metal salts in the murine local lymph node assay.

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) has been proposed as a predictive test for the identification of sensitizing agents. We used this test to compare the sensitization potential of NiSO4, K2Cr2O7, CoCl2, Na2PtCl6 and BeSO4, salts of metals which have all been associated with allergic contact dermatitis and either bronchial asthma orinterstitial lung disease, by either humoral or cell-mediated allergic mechanisms. BALB/c mice (n = 3 per concentration studied, three concentrations studied per metal) received three daily applications of the metal salt (in DMSO) on the dorsum of both ears. On the fourth day the draining auricular lymph nodes were removed and the incorporation of [3H]-thymidine in the lymphocytes in culture was compared to that of concurrent vehicle-treated control mice, thus enabling to derive a stimulation index (SI), indicative of immunological sensitization potential. Each experiment was performed three times. Oxazolone and toluene diisocyanate, chosen as positive controls, yielded strongly positive SI values (> 20 and > 30 respectively). Na2PtCl6 (SI 2.6 +/- 1.0 at 2.5%), CoCl2 (SI 2.8 +/- 0.5 at 5%) and possibly also K2Cr2O7 (SI 2.1 +/- 1.2 at 0.5%) were positive in the LLNA, whereas NiSO4 (SI 0.9 +/- 0.2 at 5%) and BeSO4 (SI 1.3 +/- 0.6 at 4%) were negative. Although our results are still limited by the fact that only one mice strain was tested, they indicate that there is no strict relationship between the sensitization potential of metal salts, as evaluated in the murine LLNA, and their potential to cause either respiratory or dermal allergic disease. Consequently, caution should be exercised before proposing the murine LLNA as a valid test to predict the sensitization potential of low molecular weight chemicals.

Allergens↗

PubMed2001

The suitability of hexyl cinnamic aldehyde as a calibrant for the murine local lymph node assay.

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) for the prospective identification of contact allergens assesses skin sensitization potential as a function of proliferative activity induced in lymph nodes draining the site of topical exposure to test chemical. This method has been endorsed recently as a stand alone test for the identification of contact allergens. We have now examined the suitability of hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (HCA), a recommended positive control for skin sensitization testing, as a calibrant for comparing the consistency of LLNA responses with time, and between laboratories, and thus for the routine assessment of assay reliability. Standard LLNAs were performed with CBA strain mice in 3 independent laboratories over a period of 8 years. Dose-response curves were used to derive mathematically the EC3 value (the estimated concentration of chemical necessary to cause a stimulation index (SI) of 3 compared with proliferation induced by concurrent vehicle controls). In each laboratory, 6 separate experiments were conducted using a single concentration of HCA (25%). Very similar stimulation indices were achieved, with mean values of 9.0, 6.5 and 6.6 recorded. A total of 10 dose-response experiments were performed independently in the 3 laboratories and these revealed that there was very little inter-laboratory, or temporal, variation in EC3 values. These data confirm that HCA responses in the LLNA are very stable and demonstrate that HCA provides a suitable calibrant for determining assay sensitivity and performance.

Acrolein↗

PubMed2001

Human potency predictions for aldehydes using the local lymph node assay.

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) assesses skin sensitization potential as a function of proliferative responses induced in lymph nodes draining the site of topical exposure to test chemical. It has been shown that interpolation of LLNA dose-response data to define the concentration of test chemical required to induce a 3-fold stimulation of proliferation (EC3) offers the prospect of a quantitative index of the relative potency of a contact allergen. Initial studies have demonstrated that there exists a strong (inverse) correlation between EC3 values and contact allergenic potency in humans. Thus, materials with a low EC3 value were more potent contact allergens in humans. However, it is necessary to examine a wide range of allergens to demonstrate that such correlations are generally true. Thus, in the present study, 10 aldehydes of varying degrees of allergenicity in man were evaluated in the LLNA and their EC3 values derived. Formaldehyde was regarded as the strongest allergen in man and also had the lowest EC3 value, 0.35% (equivalent to 0.93% formalin). In contrast, the extremely weak allergen vanillin and the non-sensitizer ethyl vanillin both had EC3 values of >50%. For the remaining 7 aldehydes, there was a close similarity between what is judged to be their rank order of allergenicity in humans and EC3 values derived from analysis of LLNA data. These results support further the utility of EC3 determinations in the LLNA as a measure of the relative potency of a contact allergen.

Aldehydes↗

PubMed1999

Influence of application vehicle on skin sensitization to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone: an analysis using the local lymph node assay.

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method for the identification of skin sensitizing chemicals in which activity is measured as a function of proliferative responses induced in draining lymph nodes following topical exposure of mice to the test material. More recently, the LLNA has also been used for the determination of relative skin sensitizing potency based upon the mathematical derivation of an EC3 value, this being the estimated concentration of test chemical necessary to provoke a 3-fold increase in lymph-node cell-proliferative activity compared with concurrent vehicle-treated controls. Here we describe the use of the LLNA to determine the influence of vehicle on the skin-sensitizing potency of methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI), the active ingredient of preservatives such as Kathon CG. To this end, LLNA responses to MCI/ MI were measured using the vehicles 4:1 acetone:olive oil (AOO), methyl ethyl ketone, dimethylsulfoxide, dimethylformamide, propylene glycol (PG) and acetone. It was found that the vehicle in which MCI/MI was applied had a substantial impact on activity, with derived EC3 values varying from 0.0049% with AOO to 0.048% with PG. With the other vehicles, EC3 values ranged from 0.0068 to 0.0076%. The skin sensitizing potency of MCI/MI as judged from LLNA responses is consistent with what is known of the requirements for sensitization in humans. It is proposed that the LLNA not only provides a method for determination of relative skin sensitizing potency, but is also appropriate for assessing the influence of vehicle matrix on sensitizing activity.

Allergens↗

PubMed2001

Prediction of drug allergenicity: possible use of the local lymph node assay.

The mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA) is currently used for the prospective identification of chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization and allergic contact dermatitis. In this respect, the assay has been fully and formally evaluated and validated, and has been accepted recently as a stand-alone method for the identification of potential skin sensitizers. The assay involves topical application of test substance and the subsequent measurement of proliferative responses in the lymph nodes draining the site of exposure. The testing of new drug entities using a similar assay technique could offer a potential alternative for the identification of potential drug allergens. Currently, the popliteal lymph node assay (PLNA), or modifications of it, are used in research studies for the identification of drugs which have the potential to cause allergic or autoimmunogenic reactions. The PLNA involves subcutaneous application of test substance into the hind footpad, followed by the measurement of proliferative responses, or other parameters of immune activation, in the popliteal lymph nodes. However, these assays have not been validated systematically and the potential utility of a modified LLNA for use in the identification of such compounds is discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Identification of metal allergens in the local lymph node assay.

BACKGROUND: The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) has recently been endorsed as a validated alternative to guinea pig methods for the identification of skin sensitization hazard. Nevertheless, there has been some debate regarding the utility of this method for the detection of metal contact allergens. OBJECTIVE: In these investigations, we have used the LLNA to determine the skin sensitization potential of 13 metal salts, 8 of which were considered to possess a significant ability to sensitize man, whereas the remaining 5 were judged to lack such potential. RESULTS: The predictions from the LLNA were correct for 7 of the 8 (88%) sensitizing metals and for 4 of the 5 (80%) nonsensitizers when considered against the experience of these metals as human skin sensitizers. Thus, the overall predictive accuracy of the LLNA in relation to metals was 11/13 (85%), which is very similar to the accuracy of approximately 88% in relation to a much larger number of low-molecular-weight organic chemicals, as reported previously. CONCLUSION: These data provide support for the potential utility of the LLNA in hazard identification of metal contact allergens.

Allergens↗

PubMed1999

The impact of vehicle on assessment of relative skin sensitization potency of 1,4-dihydroquinone in the local lymph node assay.

BACKGROUND: The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) has been validated as an alternative method for the identification of skin sensitization hazards. Contact allergens are identified as a function of proliferative responses induced in draining lymph nodes. The quantitative nature of the LLNA data also provides the opportunity of assessing relative potency by reference to dose response analyses. OBJECTIVE: In the current investigations, the influence of vehicle on the skin sensitization potency of a known skin sensitizer (1,4-dihydroquinone) was assessed. METHODS: 1, 4-dihydroquinone was tested in the LLNA using 7 different vehicle systems in each of 2 independent laboratories. RESULTS: Results from the 2 laboratories were almost identical. LLNA dose response data were interpolated to derive the estimated concentration (EC) of 1, 4-dihydroquinone necessary to cause a three-fold stimulation of proliferation compared with controls, the EC3 value. The vehicles used and mean EC3 values obtained were: methyl ethyl ketone 0.07%, acetone 0.08%, acetone/olive oil (80/20 v/v) 0.15%, dimethyl formamide 0.22%, dimethyl sulfoxide 0.4%, and propylene glycol and acetone/saline (50/50 v/v) vehicles gave negative results. However, when tested at higher concentrations, positive results were obtained in these vehicles. CONCLUSION: These data reveal that the vehicle in which a chemical is encountered in the skin can have a significant impact on a quantitative measure of skin sensitization potency. The implication is that accurate assessment of risk to humans will require an understanding of the matrix in which skin exposure is likely to occur.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Temporal stability of local lymph node assay responses to hexyl cinnamic aldehyde.

The local lymph node assay is an alternative method for the prospective identification of chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization. Activity in the assay is measured as a function of proliferative responses by draining lymph node cells induced by topical exposure of mice to the test chemical. Positive responses are defined as those where a test chemical, at one or more application concentrations, is able to induce a stimulation index of 3 or greater compared with concurrent vehicle-treated control values. Although the method has been evaluated extensively, the stability over time of responses induced in the local lymph node assay has not previously been addressed formally. It was the purpose of the investigations described here to consider this issue and, to this end, responses provoked in the local lymph node assay by hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (HCA)--a skin sensitizing chemical of moderate potency--were assessed in five separate experiments conducted in a single laboratory over a 10-month period. In each case, HCA elicited a positive response. Although some significant inter-experimental variation was recorded, this was attributable entirely to the stimulation by HCA of slightly more vigorous responses in one of the five experiments. When the results of this experiment were excluded from the data set, significant variations were lost. Finally, for each experiment an EC3 value was derived, this being the estimated concentration of test chemical required to induce a stimulation index of 3. Similar EC3 values were derived in each experiment. These data demonstrate the relative stability over time of activity in the local lymph node assay.

Acrolein↗

PubMed1998

Assessment of the skin sensitization potential of topical medicaments using the local lymph node assay: an interlaboratory evaluation.

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method for the predictive identification of chemicals that have a potential to cause skin sensitization. Activity is measured as a function of lymph node cell (LNC) proliferative responses stimulated by topical application of test chemicals. Those chemicals that induce a threefold or greater increase in LNC proliferation compared with concurrent vehicle controls are classified as skin sensitizers. In the present investigations we have evaluated further the reliability and accuracy of the LLNA. In the context of an international interlaboratory trial the sensitization potentials of six materials with a history of use in topical medicaments have been evaluated: benzoyl peroxide, hydroquinone, penicillin G, streptomycin sulfate, ethylenediamine dihydrochloride, and methyl salicylate. Each chemical was analyzed in the LLNA by all five laboratories. Either the standard LLNA protocol or minor modifications of it were used. Benzoyl peroxide and hydroquinone, both human contact allergens, elicited strong LLNA responses in each laboratory. Penicillin G, another material shown previously to cause allergic contact dermatitis in humans, was also positive in all laboratories. Streptomycin sulfate induced equivocal responses, in that this material provoked a positive LLNA response in only one of the five laboratories, and then only at the highest concentration tested. Ethylenediamine dihydrochloride dissolved in a 3:1 mixture of acetone with water, or in 4:1 acetone:olive oil (one laboratory), was uniformly negative. However, limited further testing with the free base of ethylene diamine yielded a positive LLNA response when applied in acetone:olive oil (AOO). Finally, methyl salicylate, a nonsensitizing skin irritant, was negative at all test concentrations in each laboratory. Collectively these data serve to confirm that the local lymph node assay is sufficiently robust to yield equivalent results when performed independently in separate laboratories and indicate also that the LLNA is of value in assessing the skin sensitization potential of topical medicaments.

Administration, Topical↗