PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “MECOM”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Structural complexity and mechanistic diversity of MECOM rearrangements in myeloid neoplasms.

Rearrangements involving MECOM at chromosome 3q26.2 are recurrent in myeloid neoplasms, classically represented by inv(3)(q21q26.2) and t(3;3)(q21;q26.2), which reposition the GATA2-distal haematopoietic enhancer and drive aberrant EVI1 overexpression. However, the full structural and mechanistic diversity of MECOM rearrangements (MECOM-r) is yet to be explored. We retrospectively analysed 97 cases with cytogenetically defined MECOM-r and identified 12 with complex rearrangements using GTG-banded karyotyping and tri-colour interphase/metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridisation analyses. These 12 cases demonstrated remarkable structural heterogeneity. The abnormalities encompassed translocations, inversions, insertions, duplications, and deletions, which often coexisted within the same specimen as multiple rearranged subclones. Insertional events emerged as a distinct mechanism of MECOM activation. These encompassed insertions of MYNN and/or MECOM into chromosomes 1 and 6, insertion of chromosome 8 segment into MECOM, and inverted insertions between homologous chromosome 3 segments. Recurrent breakpoints at 3q21 across multiple cases, together with localised copy number imbalances frequently involving the MYNN and GOLIM4 loci at 3q26.2, underscore the architectural fragility of these two regions. Co-occurring abnormalities such as -5/del(5q), -7/del(7q), and TP53 loss were common, reflecting a permissive genomic background for chromosomal reassembly. Our findings expand the mechanistic landscape of MECOM-r beyond canonical inv(3)/t(3;3), establishing 3q21 and 3q26.2 as structural 'hotspots' and genomic instability hubs. Distinct from fusion-driven oncogenes such as KMT2A, MECOM activation results from enhancer hijacking and regional structural remodelling, leading to EVI1 overexpression and clonal evolution in myeloid malignancies.

Humans

Mutational Landscape and Clonal Dynamics in AML Undergoing PTCy Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

To improve risk stratification, we performed targeted NGS at diagnosis in 191 patients with AML undergoing myeloablative allogeneic HCT with PTCy-based prophylaxis. We also investigated clonal evolution using paired diagnostic and relapse samples from 39 individuals. A total of 610 mutations were detected in 184 patients (96%), most commonly in FLT3 (26%), DNMT3A (25%), RUNX1 (24%), and NPM1 (19%). Sixteen unique fusion genes were identified in 35 patients, with KMT2A (43%) and core binding factor rearrangements (23%) being the most frequent. TP53 and WT1 mutations were strongly associated with adverse outcomes, whereas NPM1 retained favorable significance. RUNX1 co-mutations with SF3B1 or NRAS were associated with inferior survival. In an exploratory allelic analysis, multi-hit TP53 alterations, but not single-hit mutations, were associated with distinctly poorer OS, EFS, and relapse risk. Relapse involved mutational shifts in ∼70% of cases, with significant enrichment of WT1 and more modest increases in TP53, KRAS, ASXL1, NF1, and MECOM, while DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1 persisted stably. Neither acute nor chronic graft-versus-host disease was associated with molecular remodeling at relapse. Incorporating TP53 and WT1 into risk models, recognizing context-dependent effects of DNMT3A and RUNX1, and applying longitudinal genomic monitoring may help guide personalized strategies to prevent relapse. Extended abstract BACKGROUND Relapse remains the leading cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), yet the genetic mechanisms underlying post-transplant relapse remain poorly understood, particularly in the era of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). Characterizing the mutational landscape at diagnosis and the clonal evolution leading to relapse may improve post-transplant risk stratification and identify opportunities for personalized surveillance and intervention. OBJECTIVES To characterize the diagnostic mutational landscape, evaluate its prognostic significance, and investigate clonal evolution from diagnosis to relapse in AML patients undergoing myeloablative HCT with PTCy-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. STUDY DESIGN We performed targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) at diagnosis in 191 consecutive AML patients undergoing myeloablative allogeneic HCT with PTCy-based prophylaxis. Paired diagnostic and relapse samples were available for 39 patients to evaluate clonal evolution. RESULTS A total of 610 mutations were detected in 184 patients (96%), most commonly in FLT3 (26%), DNMT3A (25%), RUNX1 (24%), and NPM1 (19%). Sixteen unique fusion genes were identified in 35 patients, with KMT2A (43%) and core binding factor rearrangements (23%) being the most frequent. TP53 and WT1 mutations were strongly associated with adverse outcomes, whereas NPM1 retained favorable significance. RUNX1 co-mutations with SF3B1 or NRAS were associated with inferior survival. In an exploratory allelic analysis, multi-hit TP53 alterations, but not single-hit mutations, were associated with distinctly poorer OS, EFS, and relapse risk. Relapse involved mutational shifts in ∼70% of cases, with significant enrichment of WT1 and more modest increases in TP53, KRAS, ASXL1, NF1, and MECOM, while DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1 persisted stably. Neither acute nor chronic graft-versus-host disease was associated with molecular remodeling at relapse. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a comprehensive characterization of the mutational landscape and clonal evolution of AML undergoing contemporary PTCy-based allogeneic HCT. TP53 and WT1 identify patients at particularly high risk of post-transplant relapse, whereas NPM1 retains favorable prognostic significance. The frequent acquisition of new genetic lesions at relapse underscores the dynamic nature of post-transplant clonal evolution and supports longitudinal molecular monitoring together with genomically informed post-transplant surveillance and relapse-prevention strategies.

Clonal Dynamics

Distinct Genetic Risk Profile in Aortic Stenosis Compared With Coronary Artery Disease.

IMPORTANCE: Aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) frequently coexist. However, it is unknown which genetic and cardiovascular risk factors might be AS-specific and which could be shared between AS and CAD. OBJECTIVE: To identify genetic risk loci and cardiovascular risk factors with AS-specific associations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a genomewide association study (GWAS) of AS adjusted for CAD with participants from the European Consortium for the Genetics of Aortic Stenosis (EGAS) (recruited 2000-2020), UK Biobank (recruited 2006-2010), Estonian Biobank (recruited 1997-2019), and FinnGen (recruited 1964-2019). EGAS participants were collected from 7 sites across Europe. All participants were of European ancestry, and information on comorbid CAD was available for all participants. Follow-up analyses with GWAS data on cardiovascular traits and tissue transcriptome data were also performed. Data were analyzed from October 2022 to July 2023. EXPOSURES: Genetic variants. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cardiovascular traits associated with AS adjusted for CAD. Replication was performed in 2 independent AS GWAS cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 18 792 participants with AS and 434 249 control participants were included in this GWAS adjusted for CAD. The analysis found 17 AS risk loci, including 5 loci with novel and independently replicated associations (RNF114A, AFAP1, PDGFRA, ADAMTS7, HAO1). Of all 17 associated loci, 11 were associated with risk specifically for AS and were not associated with CAD (ALPL, PALMD, PRRX1, RNF144A, MECOM, AFAP1, PDGFRA, IL6, TPCN2, NLRP6, HAO1). Concordantly, this study revealed only a moderate genetic correlation of 0.15 (SE, 0.05) between AS and CAD (P = 1.60 × 10-3). Mendelian randomization revealed that serum phosphate was an AS-specific risk factor that was absent in CAD (AS: odds ratio [OR], 1.20; 95% CI, 1.11-1.31; P = 1.27 × 10-5; CAD: OR, 0.97; 95% CI 0.94-1.00; P = .04). Mendelian randomization also found that blood pressure, body mass index, and cholesterol metabolism had substantially lesser associations with AS compared with CAD. Pathway and transcriptome enrichment analyses revealed biological processes and tissues relevant for AS development. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This GWAS adjusted for CAD found a distinct genetic risk profile for AS at the single-marker and polygenic level. These findings provide new targets for future AS research.

Humans

Optical Genome Mapping in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Clinical Value and Limitations Derived From a Cohort of 236 Patients.

Identification of cytogenetic abnormalities is critical for the classification and risk stratification of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Optical genome mapping (OGM) is an emerging cytogenomic platform that enables high-resolution genome-wide cytogenetic analysis. We analyzed bone marrow specimens of 236 MDS patients, 149 newly diagnosed and 87 with relapsed/refractory disease, using OGM, conventional karyotyping, and next-generation sequencing analysis. OGM and karyotyping showed concordant results in 68% of cases, including 34% with normal findings by both assays. OGM provided additional information in 27% of patients. Common abnormalities detected exclusively by OGM included chromoanagenesis (n = 33), KMT2A partial tandem duplication (n = 7), and MECOM rearrangement (n = 4). These OGM findings led to disease reclassification and/or changes in risk stratification in 14 patients (9.4%) with newly diagnosed MDS. In contrast, OGM failed to detect small clones or subclones in 5% of patients, resulting in risk group changes in 2% of newly diagnosed MDS patients. We conclude that OGM enhances the cytogenetic assessment of MDS in approximately 25% of patients and leads to a change in disease classification and/or risk stratification in approximately 10% of patients. However, low sensitivity for detecting small clones or subclones remains a limitation of OGM.

Humans

Genomic Characterization of Classic Adamantinoma, Osteofibrous Dysplasia, and Osteofibrous Dysplasia-like Adamantinoma.

Classic adamantinoma, osteofibrous dysplasia (OFD), and OFD-like adamantinoma are rare bone tumors arising primarily in the tibiae. Their distinction can be challenging; data on their molecular pathogenesis remain limited. We searched our pathology files in 2004-2024 for available cases and performed targeted next-generation sequencing along with whole-genome single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays and 3-dimensional genomics/Hi-C sequencing in selected cases. Our cohort included 3 classic adamantinomas (2 females and 1 male; age, 14-56 years), 5 OFDs (3 females and 2 males; age, 9-25 years), and 2 OFD-like adamantinomas (1 female and 1 male; age, 30-41 years). Of the 10 tumors, 9 arose from the tibiae; 1 classic adamantinoma originated from the radius. The 3 classic adamantinomas harbored multiple copy number gains involving chromosome 7, 8, 10, 12, and/or 19. Focal deletion of chromosome 17, intergenic rearrangement involving FGFR1, and NRAS p.G12D were each present in 1 classic adamantinoma. Of the 5 OFDs, KMT2A p.C2441F, KMT2D p.S1040P, PHOX2B p.G213D, and RIF1 deletion were each present in 1 case; no additional copy number/single-nucleotide variants were identified. Of the 2 OFD-like adamantinomas, one case with tumor clusters visible only on cytokeratin immunostain harbored no variants, whereas another case with tumor clusters visible on light microscopy and cytokeratin/p40 immunostains showed gains of chromosome 7, 8, 19, and 20. By Hi-C, 1 classic adamantinoma harbored an approximately 9 Mb tandem duplication on chromosome 12q, 1 OFD harbored a rearrangement with breakpoints near MECOM and HOOK3, and the OFD-like adamantinoma with tumor clusters visible only on cytokeratin immunostain harbored no structural variant. In conclusion, classic adamantinomas and OFD might be genetically distinct. Classic adamantinomas harbored multiple alterations, including chromosome/arm-level copy number gains, the detection of which could aid their distinction from OFDs. Using genomics as the benchmark, OFD-like adamantinomas might be better delineated by light microscopy or p40 than by cytokeratin immunohistochemistry. These data expanded our molecular understanding of these rare bone tumors.

Humans